People who live in the Amazon's rural areas are among the poorest inhabitants of the continent,74 with some of the highest rates of illiteracy and worst health conditions in Latin America (IBGE, 2006). The region's poverty is partially the result of its geographic isolation. IIRSA investments in transportation infrastructure will greatly reduce this isolation and will undoubtedly promote economic growth and create new businesses opportunities and jobs—all of which will increase tax revenues and improve public services. Not surprisingly, most policymakers and the average citizen assume that the social impacts of IIRSA will be overwhelmingly positive. However, a more careful evaluation reveals that the distribution of these social effects will not benefit many of the region's current residents. Moreover, the relatively rapid introduction of economic and social change will generate a range of negative impacts in rural communities, including indigenous societies.
The conservation value of Amazonia stems in large part from its relative lack of human intrusion (Mittermeier et al. 2003), a direct result of the dispersed rural settlement that characterizes the region. Most Amazonian communities are small and contain a few hundred people. Even among the population centers with more than 1,000 individuals, the vast majority (78 percent) have fewer than 30,000 inhabitants, indicating that most villages and towns are modest in size. Despite its sparse population, Amazonia is culturally diverse with more than 281 different indigenous, nonmigrant languages; of this total, 213 are unique to the region (Figure 5.1). In addition, numerous distinct immigrant groups have settled in the area in the centuries since Francisco de Orellano first sailed down the Amazon from the Andes in 1542. Many of these nonindigenous and mestizo communities have unique social customs that have evolved over time and depend on the exploitation of the natural resources of the region. Consequently, the social landscape of the Amazon is characterized by sparse human habitation that is distributed among small settlements but contains considerable cultural diversity, reflecting the persistence of traditional indigenous and nonindigenous cultures.
MIGRATION, LAND TENURE, AND ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY
IIRSA and PPA investments in highway corridors will stimulate the migration of hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of people into the region. This mass migration will include impoverished peasants looking for a small plot of land, middle class farmers, and affluent cattle ranchers, as well as corporations seeking large tracts of inexpensive land or rich mineral deposits.75 However, in addition to this land rush, there will be parallel growth of regional urban centers as part of an evolving settlement hierarchy (Haggett et al. 1977, Ellis & Allard 1988); this will create opportunities for commerce that will be exploited primarily by urban migrants from other parts of the continent.76
Many of the Amazon's rural inhabitants will experience substantial adverse impacts from this migratory onslaught. One of the most obvious will be increased competition for land and other resources. Most of the traditional communities have never experienced such competition. With a rural population density of only 1.1 persons per square kilometer (Mittermeier et al. 2003), Amazonia provides its residents with access to large tracts of forest and aquatic habitats for food, fiber, timber, and other resources as part of a subsistence lifestyle that is fundamental to their cultures (Steward 1948). This access is defined by cultural mores that have developed because of sparse human settlement and low levels of demand: many have land parcels, but they rarely have legal title and rely instead on the principle of physical occupation and land tenure based on culturally defined patterns of inheritance that may extend over several decades of prior family use. The migration of new residents, both rich and poor, will increase competition and restrict access of traditional groups to both forest and aquatic resources, interfering with long-established patterns of resource use and land tenure (Figure 5.2).
Less obvious but not less serious are the impacts that rural peoples will suffer due to the rapidity of change in their previously isolated communities. Change to cultures is inherent, and all cultures react and adapt. However, rapid, large-scale change often exceeds the capacity of some traditional cultures to adapt successfully. One example of the adverse effects associated with rapid modernization and the opening of a previously isolated wilderness is Alaska during the final decades of the twentieth century. Although the region had experienced development of sorts over many decades, it remained relatively isolated due to a lack of infrastructure and a harsh climate that impeded settlement. However, the construction of a 1,350-kilometer-long oil pipeline to connect production fields on the North Slope with shipping facilities at Prince William Sound introduced change at a scale new to the region. Large numbers of migrant workers arrived at the same time that the new roads penetrated previously inaccessible areas. Such development generated many benefits for Alaska, but it also introduced a variety of negative impacts for rural peoples, including the indigenous groups who were the primary inhabitants of the region (Berry 1975). Among the most alarming were high rates of alcoholism and substance abuse that led to high rates of suicide, all of which can be linked to rapid culture change (Kraus & Buffler 1979, Kettl & Bixler 1991). Although the Amazon is very different from Alaska, the similarities of the situation (wilderness areas and the predominance of isolated traditional communities) and the emergence of similar impacts as a result of rapid culture change (Hezel 1987Hezel 2001) are more than sufficient to warrant that these negative impacts be given serious analysis.
One source of cultural stress will be the introduction of new ideas and values that will compete with traditional ways of life. For example, individuals who are successful in dealing with migrants may have more status than traditional leaders, a phenomenon that has been observed under similar conditions elsewhere, and one that introduces stress and conflict within indigenous communities. Most residents will not be competitive in an increasingly sophisticated urban job market. Although they have traditional knowledge that serves them well in their forest and riverside communities, rural schools with limited budgets and antiquated curriculums have not provided them with the skills required by a modern economy.
Local elites will fare better than the general population and may even benefit from the land rush because they occupy administrative positions in regional and local government. They can use their political influence to obtain title over land and then sell it to newcomers. On the Andean piedmont, leaders of peasant unions (sindicatos) obtain titles to large sections of land, divide it into smaller properties, and sell plots to settlers, who are usually a mixture of new arrivals and second-generation migrants expanding family assets, as well as to long-time residents and even indigenous families who realize that the world is changing and that formal title to a small plot is a better bet than traditional use rights to a rapidly shrinking resource. The frontier landscape is often distributed as larger properties as well. These are sold directly to ranchers and agroindustrial enterprises or are subdivided into medium-sized farms and ranches. Many medium- to largesized properties are owned by urban elites who are putting their savings into what is perceived to be a safe investment.
State land is literally up for grabs, and even protected areas and forest reserves are subject to invasion because the state has not effectively exercised its authority. In almost all instances, migrants and locals are fully aware that their land deeds have a questionable legal history but expect government to cede title to avoid social conflict. Most feel completely justified, viewing themselves as citizens with a right to occupy empty lands either because they have been denied economic opportunities (sem terras) or because their investment will create jobs and wealth for the country (urban investors and cattlemen). Private property is not exempt from invasion and settlement—especially because many of the original land deeds were acquired via fraudulent means.
The lack of a functional regulatory land tenure system in much of the region and the inability of the judicial system to punish noncompliance are important factors in the land use dynamic (Fearnside 2001b). The failure of the system is manifest not only in the chaotic settlement process, but also in the levels of violent conflict that characterize many parts of the Amazon. The murder of Sister Dorothy Stang is the most recent prominent manifestation of this conflict over land. Sister Stang was an advocate of small land holders and forest dwellers and was working to create a forest reserve opposed by loggers and cattle ranchers, in Pará, Brazil.77 IIRSA will contribute to this social conflict by opening up more land and increasing land values in the areas surrounding the new transportation corridors. To mitigate this situation effectively, the issue of land tenure and the corruption that accompanies most aspects of the land titling process must be addressed.
INDIGENOUS GROUPS AND EXTRACTIVE RESERVES
Fortunately, many indigenous groups have responded to the changing social dynamic in the greater Amazon and have organized their communities to file claim to large tracts of land (Figure 5.3). Their success speaks to the resilience of their internal social organization and the timely assistance they have received from civil society and international organizations. Indigenous communities are vocal advocates of sustainable development and forest conservation; these affirmations are amply supported by satellite images, which show dramatic differences in land use between indigenous reserves and adjacent nonindigenous areas, with the indigenous lands remaining relatively intact next to large-scale deforestation (Figure 5.4) (Schwartzman et al. 2000, Ruiz-Pérez et al. 2005). The success of indigenous reserves in halting deforestation highlights the importance of land tenure. Although their proactive efforts to protect their land are certainly a factor in avoiding deforestation within their land holdings, equally important is the knowledge that squatters will not be able to acquire title to that land. Farmers and ranchers do not randomly invade and occupy lands; they do so only when there is a high probability that their actions will eventually allow them to obtain title and that their investments in infrastructure and land clearing will not be lost, either to the true landowner or by the inability to sell the land and recoup their investments.
The conflict between cattle ranchers and forest dwellers, including indigenous groups and immigrant populations descended from rubber tappers, gave birth to the environmental and social movement led by Chico Mendes, the peasant activist who was murdered in 1988 for challenging individuals engaged in land speculation (Hecht & Cockburn 1989, Cowell 1990). Since then, fifty-eight extractive reserves have been created in the Brazilian Amazon, and similar reserves exist in Bolivia and Peru; most are quasi-protected areas where the exploitation of rubber and Brazil nuts is encouraged, but logging and agriculture are theoretically restricted. Extractive reserves have many enthusiastic proponents who seek to reconcile conservation with demands for social justice and have received significant investments from Brazilian institutions and from the World Bank.78 Political activism by forest dwellers in Acre has brought about policies to subsidize rubber production; it has also created cooperatives and local processing facilities that improve the quality and add value to rubber and Brazil nut production (Campos et al. 2005, Ruiz-Pérez et al. 2005).
However, economists continue to question whether extractive reserves can fulfill their development objectives (Bennett 2002, Goeschl & Igliori 2004). Their success as a conservation option and economic management system ultimately depends on the ability of residents to generate higher incomes by diversifying forest products. Unfortunately, this has not yet happened, and forest inhabitants are opting for increased agricultural production and timber extraction (Ruiz-Pérez et al. 2005).79 Extractive reserves will require additional economic inputs to make them viable; the only realistic source of these funds would be direct payment for ecosystem services to compensate inhabitants for forest conservation (Hall 2004, Fearnside 2005b). Similarly, the longterm conservation of indigenous lands must ultimately be based on economic incentives, or many of these groups will be tempted to exploit their timber resources nonsustainably over the medium term to improve their standard of living (Fearnside 2005b).
MIGRATION AND HUMAN HEALTH
Land use change can also have serious effects on the health of human communities, both long-time forest residents and recent arrivals. The history of diseases introduced to indigenous populations is as old as the first journey down the Amazon River by Francisco Orellana. Since then, the settlement of the Amazon has been characterized by periodic booms that inevitably lead to catastrophic epidemics in isolated populations with little resistance to cosmopolitan diseases such as measles, mumps, and chicken pox (Mann 2005). The most recent well-publicized example of this unfortunate phenomenon is the Yanomami indigenous group of Roraima, Brazil and southern Venezuela, who experienced outbreaks of diseases after contact with garimpeiro miners, missionaries, and possibly even anthropologists (Neel 1974, Sousa et al. 1997, Tierney 2000). Even today, there are documented cases of indigenous groups living in voluntary isolation in southwestern Peru where construction of the Inter Oceanic Highway, an IIRSA-sponsored investment, will soon begin. Increased logging activity in the Alto Purus region has apparently caused some of these communities to migrate into Manu National Park (pers. comm. N. Pitman 2005).
The health of migrant settlers also suffers from tropical diseases that have traditionally been associated with forest ecosystems. Recent studies in Iquitos, Peru, show that malaria transmission is greatest in deforested areas because the malarial vector, a specific mosquito species, is more abundant in the grassy habitats and stagnant pools characteristic of recently deforested landscapes (Vittor et al. 2006). Even those diseases believed to be highly dependent on forest mammals as alternative hosts, such as the leischmaniasis parasite, which has been shown to increase in colonized areas because the parasite's vector organism, the sand fly (Figure 5.5), has successfully managed to infect both dogs and humans (Campbell-Lendrum et al. 2001). The impact of deforestation on human health is not limited to forest dwellers or small farmers living in primitive conditions on the edge of the forest. The increasing incidence and severity of forest fires is also causing increased respiratory illnesses in both rural and urban settlements across the continent.
One of the most serious threats to human health in local populations will be the introduction of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Research over the past two decades has shown that in-migration is almost always accompanied by the introduction or increased incidence of HIV infections (Colvin et al. 1995). The regional integration and improved transportation systems that are at the heart of IIRSA will almost certainly increase the incidence of HIV in remote corners of the Amazon, following a pattern that has been amply documented in other parts of the world (UNAIDS 2006). The introduction of HIV will coincide with an increase in prostitution that is all too common in the frontier areas of the Amazon. Outbreaks of HIV will outpace the capacity of local health systems to manage the spread of the virus and the consequences of a subsequent AIDS epidemic. In a manner not unlike the initial exposure of once-isolated people to the common childhood diseases of the Old World, HIV in the first decades of the twenty-first century could devastate local traditional populations, a dreadful and needless repetition of history.
Environmental changes are intimately connected to social impacts, and many of the social impacts associated with IIRSA investments will have a distinctly local character and will be difficult to predict. What may appear as a largely positive social impact may have negative consequences for certain sectors of the population. Similarly, a project that may benefit a nation or group of nations may not benefit local populations. The new methodologies for environmental evaluation incorporate an extensive participatory process that is increasingly enforced by lending agencies and national governments. The purpose of this process is to identify the concerns, needs, and aspirations of the local population before the onset of migration. These evaluation methodologies are discussed in the next chapter in the context of past development and the failure of governments and multilateral agencies to manage economic growth on the Amazonian frontier.
THE MANAUS FREE TRADE ZONE
Manaus presents a stark contrast to other cities of the western Amazon. The prosperity in Manaus stems largely from the creation of a free trade zone and policies to promote economic growth. Manaus has experienced steady economic growth over four decades and created the only economy in the Amazon that is not dependent on natural resource extraction. Tax incentives and the avoidance of import tariffs have been the most important motivation for both foreign and national companies to establish assembly plants (Fabey 1997). Initial investments were largely in the electronics industry, motorcycles, and chemicals, but now also include biotechnology. Economic growth has spurred the creation of other businesses that provide the growing population with a broad range of goods and services typical of any modern economy. Tourism is an important component in the Manaus economy and is considered to have almost unlimited growth potential.
The Brazilian state is now seeking to diversify the Manaus economy by creating a value-added manufacturing sector based on the renewable natural resources of the Amazon, a strategy that will rely on the region's fisheries, timber, and nontimber forest products. The free trade zone will be expanded to 153 urban areas cities in the Brazilian Amazon, and the Getúlio Vargas Foundation will search for economically viable and environmentally sustainable business opportunities.80
Commerce plays a large role in the local economy and is a strategic component of the free trade zone. Manaus relies on three separate but linked transportation models. Air cargo services provide rapid and efficient connections for high-value products and supplies. River transport links Manaus with overseas ports, as well as being the conduit for the sale of manufactured goods to the rest of Brazil. IIRSA investments in highways will provide the third leg of this transportation model, particularly the ability of manufactured goods from Manaus to compete in the Andean market.
Within Manaus growth has led to a variety of environmental problems common to urban areas; however, the central Amazon has avoided the widespread regional deforestation that accompanies resource-based economic growth. The low deforestation rate is partly due to the limitations of the region's extremely infertile soils, but the Manaus experience demonstrates that a modern economy based on the manufacture of goods and services can provide economic opportunity to the inhabitants of the Amazon.
AndersenL. E. 1997A Cost-benefit Analysis of Deforestation in the Brazilian AmazonTexto para Discussão, no. 455Río de JanieroIPEA, Instituto de Pesquisas Econoimicas AplicadaGoogle Scholar
Banco do Brasil 2007PROEX – Programa de Financiamento às Exportações.Online. Available: http://www.bb.com.br/appbb/portal/gov/ep/srv/fed/AdmRecPROEXFin.jspGoogle Scholar
BarthemR. B. M.Goulding 1997The Catfish Connection: Ecology, Migration, and Conservation of Amazon PredatorsNew YorkColumbia University PressGoogle Scholar
BerryM. C. 1975The Alaska Pipeline: The Politics of Oil and Native Land ClaimsBloomington, INIndiana University PressGoogle Scholar
(BOA) Board on Agriculture, Committee on Sustainable Agriculture & the Environment in the Humid Tropics, National Research Council 1993Sustainable Agriculture and the Environment in the Humid TropicsWashington, DCNational Academy PressGoogle Scholar
Bolivia Forestal 2007Preliminar: Exportaciones forestales del 2006 superan los 170 Millones de $US.Cámara Forestal81Online. Available: http://www.cfb.org.bo/NoticiasBF/8.01/boletin.notaBF03.htm. June 1, 2007Google Scholar
Brito-CarreirasJ. M. J. M.Cardoso-Pereira M. L.Campagnolo Y. E.Shimabukuro 2005A land cover map for the Brazilian Legal Amazon using SPOT-4 VEGETATION data and machine learning algorithmsAnais XII Simpósio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remoto. April 16–21. Goiânia, Brasil. INPE. pp. 457–464. Online. Available: http://marte.dpi.inpe.br/col/ltid.inpe.br/sbsr/2004/11.19.14.07/doc/457.pdf. May 1, 2007Google Scholar
CadmanJ. D. 2000The Environmental Aspects of Six Hydro Reservoirs in the Amazon Basin.Submission to the World Commission on Dams, no. ENV061. Online. Available: http://www.dams.org/kbase/submissions/showsub.php?rec=ENV061. January, 13, 2007Google Scholar
CamposM. M.Francis F.Merry 2005Stronger by Association: Improving the Understanding of How Forest-Resource Based SME Associations can Benefit the PoorLondonInstituto de Pesquiza Ambiental da Amazônia & The International Institute for Environment and DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
ChinaView 2006CNPC to purchase EnCana's oil business in Ecudaor.Online. Available: http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2005-09/15/content_3497826.htm. March 14, 2007Google Scholar
ChurchillS. P. D.Griffin M.LewisIII 1995Moss diversity of the tropical Andes.In ChurchillS. P. H.Balslev E.Forero J. L.Luteyn (Eds.)Biodiversity and Conservation of Neotropical Montane Forestspp335346 Bronx, NYNew York Botanical GardenGoogle Scholar
CochraneT. A. T. J.Killeen O.Rosale 2007Agua, Gas y Agroindustria: La Gestion Sostenible de la Riego Agrícola en Santa Cruz, BoliviaLa Paz, BoliviaConservation InternationalGoogle Scholar
ColinvauxP. A. 1993Pleistocene biogeography and diversity in tropical forests of South America.In GoldblattP. (Ed.)Biological Relationships between Africa and South Americapp473499New Haven, CTYale University PressGoogle Scholar
ColliG. R. 2005As origens e a diversificação da herpetofauna do Cerrado.In ScariotA. J. C.Souza-Silva J. M.Felfili (Eds.)Cerrado: Ecologia, Biodiversidade e Conservaçãopp247264BrasíliaMinistério do Meio AmbienteGoogle Scholar
CowellA. 1990The Killing of Chico MendesEpisode 4. The Decade of Destruction: A Unique Chronicle of the Destruction of the Amazonian Rainforest. PBS Frontline Documentary Series. VideotapeGoogle Scholar
DalyD. C. D. J.Mitchell 2000Lowland vegetation of tropical South America: An overview.In LentzD. (Ed.)Imperfect Balance: Landscape Transformations in the pre-Columbian Americaspp391454New YorkColumbia University PressGoogle Scholar
DauberE. 2003Modelo de Simulación para Evaluar las Posibilidades de Cosecha en el Primer y Segundo Ciclo de Corta en Bosques Tropicales de BoliviaDocumento Técnico 128/2003Santa Cruz, BoliviaProyecto BOLFORGoogle Scholar
EmmonsL. H. 1997Neotropical Rainforest Mammals: A Field Guide2d edChicagoChicago University PressGoogle Scholar
EspinozaG. B.Richards 2002Fundamentals of Environmental Impact AssessmentWashington, DCInter-American Development Bank (IDB) & Inter-American Association of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering (AIDIS)Google Scholar
FabeyM. 1997Free-Trade-Zone Status Turns Amazon Port into Boom Town.Global Logistics & Supply Chain StrategiesOnline. Available: http://www.glscs.com/archives/2.97.FTZ.htm?adcode=90. October 13, 2006Google Scholar
FearnsideP. M. 2005bIndigenous peoples as providers of environmental services in Amazonia: Warning signs from Mato Grosso.In HallA. (Ed.)Global Impact, Local Action: New Environmental Policy in Latin Americapp187198LondonUniversity of London School of Advanced Studies, Institute for the Study of the AmericasGoogle Scholar
FearnsideP. M. Graça 2006BR-319: Brazil's Manaus-Porto Velho highway and the potential impact of a migration corridor to Central Amazonia, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia-INPA, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.Ecological Society of AmericaMérida mexicoGoogle Scholar
FoglemanV. M. 1990Guide to the National Environmental Policy Act. Interpretations, Applications, and ComplianceNew YorkQuorum BooksGoogle Scholar
GlaserB. W. I.Woods (Eds.)2004Amazonian Dark Earths: Explorations in Space and TimeBerlinSpringer-VerlagGoogle Scholar
Global Mapping International 2006World Language Mapping SystemCDROM, Colorado Springs, COGlobal Mapping InternationalGoogle Scholar
GoeschlT. D. C.Igliori 2004Property Rights, Conservation and Development: An Analysis of Extractive Reserves in the Brazilian Amazon, Natural Resources Management(FEEM) Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei. Working Paper no. 60.04. Online. Available: http://www.feem.it/Feem/Pub/Publications/WPapers/default.htmGoogle Scholar
Gomez-RomeroE. T.Tamariz-Ortiz 1998Uso de la tierra y patrones de deforestacion en la zona de Iquitos.In KalliolaR. S.Flores-Paitan (Eds.)Geoecologia y Desarrollo AmazonicoSulkavaFinnreklama OyGoogle Scholar
GouldingM. 1980The Fishes and the Forest: Explorations in the Amazonian Natural HistoryBerkeleyUniversity of California PressGoogle Scholar
GouldingM. E. G.Ferreira 1996Pescarias Amazônicas, Porteção de Habitas e Fazendas nas Várzeas:Uma Visão Ecológica e EconômicaRelatório Banco Mundial. Brasília: BIRDGoogle Scholar
GouldingM. R.Barthem E.Ferreira 2003The Smithsonian Atlas of the AmazonWashington, DCSmithsonian Institution PressGoogle Scholar
GroganJ. E. P.Barreto A.Veríssimo 2002Mahogany in the Brazilian Amazon: Ecology and perspectives on managementBelém, Brazil(IMAZON) Amazon Institute of People and the EnvironmentGoogle Scholar
HaggettP. A. D.Cliff A.Frey 1977Locational Analysis in Human GeographyNew YorkWileyGoogle Scholar
HallA. 2004Extractive Reserves: Building Natural Assets in the Brazilian Amazon.Working Paper Series, no. 74Amherst, MA(PERI) Political Economy Research InstituteGoogle Scholar
HanaiM. 1998Formal and garimpo mining and the environment in Brazil.In WarhurstA. (Ed.)Mining and the Environment: Case Studies from the Americaspp181197OttowaInternational Development Research CenterOnline. Available: http://reseau.crdi.ca/en/ev-31006-201-1-DO_TOPIC.htmlGoogle Scholar
HarperG. J. M. K.Steininger Y.Talero M.Sanabria T. J.Killeen L. A.Solorzano 2007Deforestation Assessments Across the Andes.Online. Available: http://science.conservation.org/portal/server.pt?open=512&objID=755&&PageID=128505&mode=2&in_hi_userid=124186&cached=true. May 1, 2007Google Scholar
HechtS. B. A.Cockburn 1989The Fate of the Forest: Developers, Destroyers, and Defenders of the AmazonLondonVersoGoogle Scholar
HezelF. X. 2001The New Shape of Old Island CulturesHonoluluUniversity of Hawaii PressGoogle Scholar
(IBGE) Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estadística 2006Síntese de Indicadores Sociais 2006.Online. Available: http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/populacao/condicaodevida/indicadoresminimos/sinteseindicsociais2006/default.shtm. May 5, 2007Google Scholar
(IDB) Inter-American Development Bank 2006Building a New Continent: A Regional Approach to Strengthening South American InfrastructureWashingtonIDBOnline. Available: http://www.iadb.org/publications/Reports.cfm?language=en&parid=4. May, 15, 2007Google Scholar
(IPCC) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, Summary for PolicymakersContribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovenmental Panel on Climate ChangeGenevaIPCCOnline. Available: http://www.ipcc.ch/SPM2feb07.pdf. April 1, 2007Google Scholar
IUCN Commission on National Parks & Protected Areas & World Conservation Monitoring Centre 1994Guidelines for Protected Area Management CategoriesGland, SwitzerlandIUCNGoogle Scholar
KabatP. M.Claussen P. A.Dirmeyer J. H. C.Gash L.Bravo de Guenni M.Meybeck R. A.PielkeSr. C. J.Vorosmarty R. W. A.Hutjes S.Lutkemeier (Eds.)2004Vegetation, Water, Humans and the Climate: A New Perspective on an Interactive SystemBerlinSpringer VerlagGoogle Scholar
KaimowitzD. A.Angelsen 1998Economic Models of Tropical Deforestation: A ReviewBogorCenter for International Forestry ResearchGoogle Scholar
KalliolaR. S.Flores-Paitan 1998Geoecologia y desarolla Amazonico: Estudio integrado en la zona de Iquitos, PeruAnnales Universitatis Turkuensis, Ser A IITurku, FinlandTurku UniversityGoogle Scholar
KaltnerF. J. G. F. P.Azevedo I. A.Campos A. O. F.Mundim 2005Liquid Biofuels for Transportation in Brazil: Potential and Implications for Sustainable Agriculture and Energy in the 21st CenturySubmitted report by Fundação Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento Sustentável. Commissioned by The German Technical Cooperation. (GTZ) Online. Available: http://www.fbds.org.br/IMG/pdf/doc-116.pdf. April 2007Google Scholar
KilleenT. J. S. G.Beck E.Garcia 1993Guía de Arboles de BoliviaLa Paz, BoliviaHerbario Nacional de Bolivia & Missouri Botanical GardenGoogle Scholar
KilleenT. J. M.Douglas T.Consiglio P. M.Jørgensen 2007aWet spots and dry spots in the Andean Hotspot, the link between regional climate variability and biodiversity.Journal of BiogeopgraphyIn pressGoogle Scholar
KilleenT. J. V.Calderon L.Soria B.Quezada M. K.Steininger G.Harper L. A.Solórzano C. J.Tucker 2007bThirty Years of Land-Cover Change in Bolivia.AMBIOIn pressGoogle Scholar
LehmannJ. D. C.Kern B.Glaser W. I.Woods 2003Amazonian Dark Earths: Origin, Properties, ManagementDordrecht, The NetherlandsKluwerGoogle Scholar
LugoA. E. 2002Homoegeocene in Puerto Rico.In ZarinD. J. J. R R.Alavalapati F. E.Putz M.Schmink (Eds.)Working Forests in the Neotropics: Conservation through Sustainable Managementpp266276New YorkColumbia University PressGoogle Scholar
MacArthurR. H. E. O.Wilson 1967The Theory of Island BiogeographyPrinceton, NJPrinceton University PressGoogle Scholar
MachadoR. M. B.Ramos-Neto M. B.Harris R.Lourival L. M. S.Aguiar 2004Análise de lacunas de proteção da biodiversidade no Cerrado.InAnais IV Congresso Brasileiro de Unidades de Conservaçãopp2938Curitiba, BrasilBrasil Fundação O Boticário de Proteção à NaturezaGoogle Scholar
MachadoR. B. M. B. R.Neto J. M. C.Silva R. B.Cavalcanti 2007Cerrado deforestation and its effects on biodiversity conservation.In KlinkC. A. R. B.Cavalcanti R.Defries (Eds.)Cerrado Land-Use and Conservation: Balancing Human and Ecological NeedsApplied Advances in Biodiversity Science, no. 8Washington, DCCenter for Applied Biodiversity Science, Conservation International (CI)(In press)Google Scholar
MalhiY. J.Wright 2005Late twentieth-century patterns and trends in the climate of tropical forest regions.In MalhiY. O. L.Phillips (Eds.)Tropical Forests & Global Atmospheric Changepp316OxfordOxford University PressGoogle Scholar
MannC. 20051491: New Revelations of the Americas before ColumbusNew YorkKnopfGoogle Scholar
MargulisS. 2004Causes of Deforestation in the Brazilian AmazonBrasiliaWorld BankGoogle Scholar
MaslinM. 2005The longevity and resilience of the Amazon rainforest.In MahliY. O. L.Phillips (Eds.)Tropical Forests & Global Atmospheric Changepp167183OxfordOxford University PressGoogle Scholar
MayleF. E. M. E.Bush 2005Amazonian ecosystems and atmospheric change since the last gl;acial maximum.In MalhiY. O. L.Phillips (Eds.)Tropical Forests & Global Atmospheric Changepp183191OxfordOxford University PressGoogle Scholar
MertesL. A. K. E. M. L.Novo D. L.Daniel Y. E.Shimabukuro J. E.Richey T.Krug 1996Classification of Rios Solimoes-Amazonas wetlands through application of spectral mixture analysis to landsat thematic mapper data.VIII Simposio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento RemotoSalvador, BrazilGoogle Scholar
MoriS. A. G. T.Prance 1990Lecythidaceae - part II: The zygomorphic-flowered New World genera (Couroupita, Corythophora, Bertholletia, Couratari, Eschweilera, & Lecythis).Flora Neotropica Monographno. 21Bronx, NYNew York Botanical GardenGoogle Scholar
NairU. S. D. K.Ray R. O.Lawton R. M.Welch R. A.PielkeSr. J.Calvo The impact of deforestation on orographic cloud formation in a complex tropical environment.In BruijnzeelL. A. J.Juvik F. N.Scatena L. S.Hamilton P.Bubb (Eds.)Mountains in the Mist: Science for Conserving and Managing Tropical Montane Cloud ForestsHonoluluUniversity of Hawaii PressIn PressGoogle Scholar
OrtizE. 2005Conservation Biology of Brazil-nut Rich ForestsWashingtonSmithsonian InstitutionGoogle Scholar
PachecoP. 1998Estilos de Desarrollo, deforestación y Degradación de Los Bosques en Las Tierras Bajas de BoliviaLa PazCIFOR, CEDLA, Fundacion TIERRAGoogle Scholar
PartidárioM. R. 1999Strategic environmental assessment: Principles and potential.In PettsJ. Handbook on Environmental Impact Assessmentpp6073LondonBlackwellGoogle Scholar
PartidárioM. R. R.Clark 2000Perspectives on Strategic Environmental AssessmentBoca Raton, FLCRC PressGoogle Scholar
PattonJ. L. M. N. F.da Silva 1998Rivers, refuges, and ridges: The geography of speciation of Amazonian mammals.In HowardD. J. S. H.Berlocher Endless Forms: Species and Speciationpp202213OxfordOxford University PressGoogle Scholar
PearceD. W. 1994Economic Value BiodiversityLondonJames & Jame, EarthscanGoogle Scholar
PenningtonT. 1997The Genus Inga – BotanyLondonRoyal Botanic Gardens, KewGoogle Scholar
PenningtonR. T. M.Lavin D. E.Prado C. A.Pendry S. K.Pell 2005Climate change and speciation in Neotropical seasonally forest plants.In MalhiY. O. L.Phillips Tropical Forests & Global Atmospheric Changepp191198OxfordOxford University PressGoogle Scholar
PowersM. 2002Illegal loggers invade primordial indigenous natives.Environment News ServiceOnline. Available: http://www.ensnewswire.com/ens/aug2002/2002-08-09-01.asp. August 9, 2002Google Scholar
PranceG. T. 1972ChrysobalanaceaeFlora Neotropica Monograph, no. 9New YorkPublished for Organization for Flora Neotropica by HafnerGoogle Scholar
PranceG. T. 1989Chrysobalanaceae: SupplementFlora Neotropica. Monograph, no. 9SNew YorkOrganizaiton for Flora NeotropicaGoogle Scholar
(PROMPEX) Peruvian Export Promotion Agency 2006Boletines Sectoriales de Exportación: Enero – Marzo 2006.Online.Available: http://www.prompex.gob.pe/Prompex/Portal/Sector/DefaultSector.aspx?.menuId=3Google Scholar
PutzF. E. M. A.Pinard T. S.Fredericksen M.Peña-Claros 2004Forest science and the BOLFOR experience: Lessons learned about natural forest management in Bolivia.In ZarinD. J. J. R. R.Alavalapati F. E.Putz M.Schmink Working Forests in the Neotropics: Conservation through Sustainable Managementpp6496New YorkColumbia University PressGoogle Scholar
RatterJ. A. S.Bridgewater J. F.Ribeiro 2006Biodiversity patterns of the woody vegetation of the Brazilian Cerrados.In PenningtonR. T. G.Lewis J. A.Ratter Neotropical Savannas and Dry Forests: Plant Diversity, Biogeography and ConservationBoca Raton, FLCRC PressGoogle Scholar
RedwoodIII.J. 2002World Bank Approaches to the Brazilian Amazon: The Bumpy Road toward Sustainable Development.Latin America and Caribbean Region Sustainable Development Working Paper, no. 13. Washington: The World BankOnline. Available:http://wbln0018.worldbank.org/.../b8234d558447e77e85256ccd005dbbc5/$FILE/redwood%Google Scholar
ReidW. V. S. A.Laird R.Gamez A.Sittenfeld D. H.Janzen M. A.Gollin C.Juma 1993A new lease on life.In ReidW. V. S. A.Laird C. A.Meyer R.Gamez A.Sittenfeld D. H.Janzen M. A.Gollin C.Juma Biodiversity Prospecting: Guidelines for Using Genetic and Biochemical Resources Sustainably and Equitablypp152WashingtonWorld Resources InstituteGoogle Scholar
Reuters 2007South American Heads Meet in Brazil.January 7. Online. Available at http://www.reuters.com/news/video/videoStory?videoId=30147Google Scholar
RicardoF. A.Rolla 2006Mineração em Unidades de Conservação na Amazônia BrasileiraSão PauloInstituto SocioambientalGoogle Scholar
RiceD. C. A.Sugal S. M.Ratay G. A. B.da Fonseca 2001Sustainable Forest Management: A Review of Conventional WisdomAdvances in Applied Biodiversity Science, no. 3Washington DCCenter for Applied Biodiversity Science at Conservation InternationalGoogle Scholar
RosenfeldA. B. D. L.Gordon M.Guerin-McManus 1997Reinventing the Well Approaches to Minimizing the Environmental and Social Impact of Oil Development in the TropicsWashington, DCConservation InternationalGoogle Scholar
RosenthalJ. P. 1997Equitable sharing of biodiversity benefits: Agreements on genetic resources.InInvesting In Biological Diversity: Proceedings of the Cairns Conferencepp253274ParisOrganisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)Google Scholar
RuffinoM. L. 2001Strategies for Managing Biodiversity in Amazonian FisheriesManaus, BrazilThe Brazilian Environmental and Renewable Natural Resources Institute (IBAMA)Online. Available: http://www.unep.org/bpsp/HTML%20files/TS-Fisheries2.htmlGoogle Scholar
RylandsA. B. M.Fonseca R.Machado R.Cavalcanti 2005Brazil.In SpaldingM. S.Chape M.Jenkins The State of the World's Protected AreasCambridgeUnited Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and World Conservation Monitoring Centre (WCMC)Google Scholar
SchaeferS. 2000Fishes of Inundated Tropical Savannas: Diversity and Endemism in the Serrania Huanchaca of Eastern BoliviaFinal report sponsored by The American Museum Center for Biodiversity and Conservation. Online. Available: http://188.8.131.52/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=cache:h-ivoaIKpAJ:research.amnh.org/ichthyology/bolivia.pdf+Schaefer+Fishes+Tropical+inundatedGoogle Scholar
SchwartzmanS. 1985Banking on disaster.Multinational Monitor67Online. Available: http://www.multinationalmonitor.org/hyper/issues/1985/0615/schwartzman.htmlGoogle Scholar
SmithD. N. T. J.Killeen 1998A comparison of the structure and composition of montane and lowland tropical forest in the Serranía Pilón Lajas, Beni, Bolivia.In DallmeierF. J. A.Comiskey Forest Biodiversity in North, Central and South America and the Caribbean: Research and MonitoringMan and the Biosphere Series, no. 22pp681700Carnforth, UKUNESCO, The Parthenon Publishing GroupGoogle Scholar
StebbinsG. L. 1950Variation and evolution in plantsNew YorkColumbia University PressGoogle Scholar
StewardJ. H. 1948Handbook of South American Indians. Vol. 3. The Forest TribesWashington, DCBureau of American Ethnography & The Smithsonian InstitutionGoogle Scholar
StotzD. F. J. W.Fitzpatrick T. A.ParkerIII D. K.Moskovits 1996Neotropical Birds: Ecology and ConservationChicagoUniversity of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
TierneyP. 2000Darkness in El Dorado: How Scientists and Journalists Devastated the AmazonNew YorkWW Norton and CompanyGoogle Scholar
TreeceD. 1988Brutality and Brazil: The Human Cost of Cheap Steel.Multinational Monitor92Online. Available: http://multinationalmonitor.org/hyper/issues/1988/02/mm0288_08.html#nameGoogle Scholar
TrollC. 1968The Cordilleras of the Tropical Americas: Aspects of Climatic, Phytogeographical and Agrarian EcologyBonnFerd DümmlersGoogle Scholar
(UNFCCC) United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 2006Background Paper for the Workshop on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation in Developing Countries30 August – 1 September 2006. Rome, Italy. Online. Available: http://unfccc.int/methods_and_science/lulucf/items/3757.phpGoogle Scholar
VeigaM. M. 1997Mercury in Artisanal Gold Mining in Latin America: Facts, Fantasies and Solutions.UNIDO -Expert Group Meeting: Introducing new technologies for abatement of global mercury pollution deriving from artisanal gold miningVienna. July 1–3. Online. Available: http://www.facome.uqam.ca/. November 5, 2006Google Scholar
WanderlyI. F. R. L.Fonseca P. G.Pereira P.do A. C.Prado A.de A. B.Oliveira F. P.Barbosa F.Panciera 2007Implicações da Iniciativa de Integração da Infraestrutura Regional Sulamericana e projetos correlacionados na política de conservação no Brasil.InPolítica Ambiental, no. 3BrasíliaConservation InternationalOnline. Available: http://www.conservacao.org/publicacoes/index.php?t=5Google Scholar
WarhurstA. 1998Mining and the Environment: Case Studies from the AmericasOttowaInternational Development Research CenterGoogle Scholar
World Bank 1991Environmental Assessment SourcebookVol. 1Policies, Procedures, and Cross-sectoral Issues. World Bank Technical Paper Number 139Washington, DCWorld BankGoogle Scholar
World Bank 2003aA Common Framework: Converging Requirements of Multilateral Financial Institutions No. 1, Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)WashingtonWorld BankOnline. Available: http://www1.worldbank.org/harmonization/romehlf/Background/MFI%20Final%20Jan17%202003-Eng.pdf. May 15, 2007Google Scholar
World Bank 2006Finding Sustainable Ways to Extract Forest Products in the Amazon.Pilot Program Extractive Reserves ProjectOnline. Available: http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/LACEXT/BRAZILEXTN/0,,contentMDK:20754543~pagePK:141137~piPK:141127~theSitePK:322341,00.html. June 1, 2007Google Scholar
 74 We make this statement with a caveat: indicators based on income are not wholly indicative of well-being and must be interpreted carefully. Because most rural Amazonian economies have limited access to wage labor and rely on subsistence activities to provide life's necessities, lower incomes are to be expected.
 75 The precedents for this type of migratory phenomena are historically abundant and include most of the settling of the U.S. Midwest. Some of Oklahoma's “Sooner” settlers, for example, ignored the regulatory framework by arriving before the official date of land distribution.
 76 Two famous historical precedents are the California gold rush, where merchants who sold supplies to gold miners went on to form businesses that eventually evolved into the famous Levi Straus, the Central Pacific Railroad, and Armour Meat Packers (http://www.baltimoreopera.com/studyguide/fanciulla_04.asp). Many of the first commercial enterprises in the Amazon were founded by Lebanese migrants whose descendents are still residents of the region, or who occupy prominent positions in the São Paulo business and professional community (http://www.la.utexas.edu/research/paisano/EECtext.html).
 77 According to the Pastoral Land Commission, about 1,380 people have been killed in land conflicts in Brazil since the mid-1980s (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A40503-2005Feb20.html).
 78 The Brazilian Environment Ministry and the World Bank have invested $17 million in four extractive reserves in Brazil since the mid-1980s (World Bank 2006).
 79 In Bolivia, there is an ongoing land tenure conflict between Brazil nut concessionaires who have long dominated the region with large land concessions, and peasant settlers, many of whom are former employees of the concessionaires who have established communities and land claims adjacent to concessionaire properties. Settlers establish their land claims under Bolivian law by clearing and farming lands. A recent study of peasant perceptions of land value established that agricultural use was considered the first priority and that the forest was viewed as a secondary resource to be exploited for Brazil nut and timber.
 80 The resources for this program have been budgeted at $183 million. The largest part ($58.85 million or 32 percent of the total) is dedicated to Amazonas state. See http://www.suframa.gov.br/modelozfm_desregional_id.cfm.