Multilateral development banks have been harshly criticized for failing to identify and mitigate the environmental and social impacts associated with the projects they finance. Beginning in the 1980s, the World Bank promoted guidelines for its investments that included environmental impact analyses (EIAs) and environmental management plans (World Bank 1991, 2003a). However, this approach has shown serious shortcomings. Traditional EIAs tend to focus on direct impacts in the implementation phase of projects, failing to identify secondary impacts from economic, social, or environmental phenomena associated with the infrastructure investments. Similarly, most EIAs did not consider cumulative impacts or the synergistic impacts of a project when aggregated with other projects. The consequences of any individual project might not be noteworthy, but the secondary, synergistic, and cumulative impacts that emerge amid a combination of projects and market phenomena may cause repercussions far beyond the project's direct impacts (Fogelman 1990). Finally, traditional EIAs have not been able to influence investment decisions made by the development banks because they have been conducted after financial and planning processes have already been set in motion. Viewed cynically, their intent was to meet a regulatory requirement or to manage a specific environmental problem, not to influence the design of a project or the decision to proceed with an investment. The public consultative processes of traditional EIAs were indicative of this inherent flaw: they were conducted after the study was completed to inform civil society, rather than to involve society in decisions about whether to proceed, modify, or reject the planned investment.
STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
Because of the deficiencies inherent in the traditional EIA, a new evaluation process has been developed to incorporate broader geographic and thematic criteria (Partidário & Clark 2000, Espinoza & Richards 2002). Dubbed Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA), this approach intends to integrate environmental considerations into decision-making (Partádario 1999). It is meant to evaluate policies, plans, and programs—an expanded focus that encompasses many of the large-scale, complex projects that arose during the 1980s and 1990s, and that characterize IIRSA's current portfolio.
As with an EIA, “environment” in SEA refers to both the natural and the human, or social, environment. One goal of SEAs is to identify accurately the full range of a potential project's direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts on the natural and human environment, so that effective mitigation can be designed and implemented, and to ensure that civil society participates proactively in both the investigation and recommendation phases of the study. Recommendations are organized in an environmental action plan that provides a framework for mitigating negative impacts, enhancing positive impacts, and designing development initiatives that will meet the specific environmental goals identified in the SEA. With these broader assessments and the engagement of society early in the planning and implementation phases to ensure a democratic process, the SEA can foster sustainable development environmentally, socially, and economically. Table 2 lists the main components of an SEA.
The IDB has been a leader in developing the SEA methodology. It financed the first SEA in Bolivia in 1999 preliminary to the construction of the Corridor Puerto Suárez–Santa Cruz (part of the IIRSA Central Inter Oceanic Hub)81 and later for a northern transportation corridor intended to connect La Paz with Riberalta and Cobija. In Peru, CAF has assumed the responsibility of organizing the SEAs and their environmental action plans.82 CAF has also made a commitment to incorporate environmental evaluation as an integral part of the planning process at the design phase and has financed the creation of an environmental planning tool that includes multiple databases of environmental and social information for the Andean region.83
The IDB also played an important role in coordinating the environmental evaluation and management plans for the Camisea pipeline, and although it provided relatively little of the total financing, this leadership effectively reduced the political and environmental risk, making the investment more attractive to private banks.84
Despite the positive developments in designing and conducting comprehensive impact assessments, these approaches do not appear to have been applied to IIRSA, nor to many of the projects contemplated in the Brazilian PPA. Essentially, the member governments presented a list of priority projects that were subsequently put on the fast track for future funding. Although IIRSA's Web site states that environmental themes were incorporated in a feasibility analysis during its preparatory stages in 2003 and 2004, the results of this analysis have not been presented to the public. According to the Bank Information Center, a watchdog group that monitors multilateral funding agencies, IIRSA's participating institutions have not indicated how they intend to harmonize their environmental standards (BICECA 2006b). Unfortunately, it appears that CAF and the IDB have not taken full advantage of the resources within their own institutions; for example, a cursory examination of the maps presented on the IIRSA Web site reveals that important protected areas are not shown within their database, including Madidi, Tambopata, and Cordillera Azul. Errors in the public presentation of their projects raise serious questions as to the adequacy of the environmental review process.
In a recent article, Robert Goodland, former director of the World Bank's environmental unit, commented on the deficiencies in the environmental policies of multilateral lending agencies. Among his many recommendations, three are particularly important for IIRSA. First, Goodland identifies the need to expand the scope of environmental analysis so that all loans are evaluated in the context of environmental and social impacts, including structural adjustment loans and short-term loans to manage balance of payment and macroeconomic aspects of national economies.85 Second, Goodland recommends that all loans be evaluated in the context of global climate change, examining the risk climate change represents to the investment as well as the risk the investment represents to the global climate. Finally, Dr. Goodland suggests that strategic environmental and social evaluation be incorporated as a core element in developing the country assistance strategy, the planning document that establishes the framework for the entire lending portfolio for each multilateral institution (Goodland 2005).
Pressure from civil society will motivate governments and financial agencies to conduct fairly complete environmental and social evaluations for each of the IIRSA transportation corridors, and these will produce management plans that will attempt to limit the direct and indirect environmental impacts. However, a piecemeal approach to environmental evaluation and the formulation of separate management plans will not significantly alter the eventual outcome of global warming, widespread deforestation, and forest degradation. The issue is specifically that of cumulative and synergistic impacts. Taken individually, projects may not seem likely to generate significant adverse impacts and are unfortunately implemented with little real concern for avoiding or mitigating negative consequences. When taken as aggregate, however, as discussed in Chapter 2, the various development projects under IIRSA will have major synergistic impacts that can and should be identified and addressed.
According to the guidelines outlined by the IDB, environmental analysis should be conducted at the scale appropriate for the policies, plans, and programs being implemented (Espinoza & Richards 2002). Because IIRSA is a continental-scale initiative, analysis should be conducted at the continental scale to identify cumulative impacts. That evaluation should likewise focus on the synergistic effects of all IIRSA projects in the context of other regional and global development phenomena. Recommendations must also be international in perspective and should incorporate solutions that respond directly to the human behaviors driving ecosystem degradation in the Amazon.
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PLANS
One of the most important components of an SEA is the environmental action plan, an instrument that puts forth steps to avoid, mitigate, or compensate for the primary and secondary impacts identified in the evaluation. More importantly, however, this plan is supposed to operate as a sustainable development road map to achieve the goals that the SEA has defined. Environmental action plans are executed by local governments, usually with the financial assistance of the multilateral agency involved in the project.86 The primary objective of an action plan is to create a legal framework and provide incentives for sustainable development in the region that will be affected by the project. For example, integrated farming systems are promoted in areas identified as suitable for permanent agriculture and agroforestry, whereas sustainable forest management, which includes both timber and nontimber forest products, is promoted on landscapes identified as appropriate for those activities. Key to both sets of recommendations is an agro-ecological zoning study to delimit appropriate land use.
An environmental action plan is intended to mitigate social liabilities in frontier areas by making priority investments in social infrastructure and services while producers are given financial credit to make the recommended investments. Efforts to resolve land tenure conflict and protect indigenous rights figure prominently, as do programs to consolidate protected area systems. The most recent example of an environmental action plan is the Sustainable Development Plan for BR-163, the highway that connects Cuiabá with Santarém in the Brazilian Amazon. Regardless of the good intentions of governments and financial agencies to identify and mitigate both primary and secondary impacts of infrastructure investments, recent history shows how difficult it is to manage development in the Amazon. In the 1980s and 1990s, the Brazilian government attempted to manage the settlement process via two ambitious projects in the State of Rondônia. The first, known as the PoloNordeste Project, was financed by the World Bank despite an internal due diligence evaluation that identified almost all of the risks that eventually came to plague the project (Redwood 2002). The World Bank was severely criticized for its role in designing and executing the project and eventually agreed to a follow-up natural resource management project, known as PLANAFLORO, which was intended to create a legal framework and incentive structure for sustainable development in Rondônia (Schwartzman 1985).
Text Box 6
Deforestation: It's the Economy
Perhaps the most important lesson learned from the PLANAFLORO project in Rondônia in the 1990s is the recognition that community-based efforts are not enough to achieve sustainable development. Deforestation is almost entirely caused by the actions of individual land-holders, both family and corporate, pursuing economically advantageous production models. This conclusion is succinctly summarized in the “Lessons Learned” chapter of the PLANAFLORO evaluation (World Bank 2003b):
The objective of the project was to change behavior of private and public agents in the use of the natural resources of tropical rain forests. The project concept did not recognize the strong existing economic and political forces that were (and still are) working in favor of continued expansion of forest clearing—the “political economy” of the frontier states … They [the project initiatives] accommodated one part of society (“organized civil society”) but not private sector interests, on the basis of a vague strategy of community-driven development, largely without any solid and proven natural resource management technologies that would have reverted the mainstream use (clearing) of rain forests.
The experience of PLANAFLORO provides important lessons for attempts to “fix” development in the Amazon. An internal review conducted at the termination of the project revealed it to be a mixed success (World Bank 2003b) (see Text Box 6). On the plus side, investments in health and educational services were deemed adequate, the strengthening of community organizational and civil society was considered to be very good, and investments in improving the physical infrastructure such as water, rural electricity, and road maintenance were considered to have been adequately executed. Another bright spot was that conservation units and indigenous territories were consolidated; the federal government and the State of Rondônia demarcated 4.75 million hectares as protected areas and 4.81 million hectares as indigenous lands, which jointly represents approximately 40 percent of the land surface of the State of Rondônia.87
Unfortunately, PLANAFLORO was unable to slow deforestation. Approximately 35 percent of the total surface of Rondônia has now been deforested, which accounts for almost 70 percent of the forest area outside of conservation units and indigenous territories. In practical terms, that means virtually all existing forests outside of protected areas have been degraded due to wildfire and fragmentation. Moreover, there are widespread reports of illegal logging in conservation areas and indigenous reserves (Pedlowski et al. 2005), which are also routinely subject to fire.
There is always hope that future efforts to manage development will work better, which is essentially the motivation for the Sustainable Development Plan for BR-163. Noteworthy in that effort is the emphasis on repeating what is known to work, mainly the designation of all currently existing forested landscapes as conservation units or indigenous reserves. The evident goal is to create a girdle around the development corridor and, one hopes, limit deforestation to a narrow corridor adjacent to the highway. Perhaps the most important difference between PLANAFLORO and Plano BR-163 is the participation of federal, state, and municipal governments in its design and implementation.
Unfortunately, the environmental action plans associated with IIRSA investments may also struggle with implementation. In Bolivia, the action plan for the IIRSA transportation corridors between Santa Cruz and Puerto Suárez is plagued by administrative problems, whereas in Peru the SEA is being conducted concurrent with the construction phase of the InterOceanic Corridor. In Ecuador, the new government has proposed a highway to connect Manaus with the Ecuadorean lowlands, and in Colombia, civil unrest and illicit drugs will complicate any organized effort to manage development.
AndersenL. E. 1997A Cost-benefit Analysis of Deforestation in the Brazilian AmazonTexto para Discussão, no. 455Río de JanieroIPEA, Instituto de Pesquisas Econoimicas AplicadaGoogle Scholar
Banco do Brasil 2007PROEX – Programa de Financiamento às Exportações.Online. Available: http://www.bb.com.br/appbb/portal/gov/ep/srv/fed/AdmRecPROEXFin.jspGoogle Scholar
BarthemR. B. M.Goulding 1997The Catfish Connection: Ecology, Migration, and Conservation of Amazon PredatorsNew YorkColumbia University PressGoogle Scholar
BerryM. C. 1975The Alaska Pipeline: The Politics of Oil and Native Land ClaimsBloomington, INIndiana University PressGoogle Scholar
(BOA) Board on Agriculture, Committee on Sustainable Agriculture & the Environment in the Humid Tropics, National Research Council 1993Sustainable Agriculture and the Environment in the Humid TropicsWashington, DCNational Academy PressGoogle Scholar
Bolivia Forestal 2007Preliminar: Exportaciones forestales del 2006 superan los 170 Millones de $US.Cámara Forestal81Online. Available: http://www.cfb.org.bo/NoticiasBF/8.01/boletin.notaBF03.htm. June 1, 2007Google Scholar
Brito-CarreirasJ. M. J. M.Cardoso-Pereira M. L.Campagnolo Y. E.Shimabukuro 2005A land cover map for the Brazilian Legal Amazon using SPOT-4 VEGETATION data and machine learning algorithmsAnais XII Simpósio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remoto. April 16–21. Goiânia, Brasil. INPE. pp. 457–464. Online. Available: http://marte.dpi.inpe.br/col/ltid.inpe.br/sbsr/2004/11.19.14.07/doc/457.pdf. May 1, 2007Google Scholar
CadmanJ. D. 2000The Environmental Aspects of Six Hydro Reservoirs in the Amazon Basin.Submission to the World Commission on Dams, no. ENV061. Online. Available: http://www.dams.org/kbase/submissions/showsub.php?rec=ENV061. January, 13, 2007Google Scholar
CamposM. M.Francis F.Merry 2005Stronger by Association: Improving the Understanding of How Forest-Resource Based SME Associations can Benefit the PoorLondonInstituto de Pesquiza Ambiental da Amazônia & The International Institute for Environment and DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
ChinaView 2006CNPC to purchase EnCana's oil business in Ecudaor.Online. Available: http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2005-09/15/content_3497826.htm. March 14, 2007Google Scholar
ChurchillS. P. D.Griffin M.LewisIII 1995Moss diversity of the tropical Andes.In ChurchillS. P. H.Balslev E.Forero J. L.Luteyn (Eds.)Biodiversity and Conservation of Neotropical Montane Forestspp335346 Bronx, NYNew York Botanical GardenGoogle Scholar
CochraneT. A. T. J.Killeen O.Rosale 2007Agua, Gas y Agroindustria: La Gestion Sostenible de la Riego Agrícola en Santa Cruz, BoliviaLa Paz, BoliviaConservation InternationalGoogle Scholar
ColinvauxP. A. 1993Pleistocene biogeography and diversity in tropical forests of South America.In GoldblattP. (Ed.)Biological Relationships between Africa and South Americapp473499New Haven, CTYale University PressGoogle Scholar
ColliG. R. 2005As origens e a diversificação da herpetofauna do Cerrado.In ScariotA. J. C.Souza-Silva J. M.Felfili (Eds.)Cerrado: Ecologia, Biodiversidade e Conservaçãopp247264BrasíliaMinistério do Meio AmbienteGoogle Scholar
CowellA. 1990The Killing of Chico MendesEpisode 4. The Decade of Destruction: A Unique Chronicle of the Destruction of the Amazonian Rainforest. PBS Frontline Documentary Series. VideotapeGoogle Scholar
DalyD. C. D. J.Mitchell 2000Lowland vegetation of tropical South America: An overview.In LentzD. (Ed.)Imperfect Balance: Landscape Transformations in the pre-Columbian Americaspp391454New YorkColumbia University PressGoogle Scholar
DauberE. 2003Modelo de Simulación para Evaluar las Posibilidades de Cosecha en el Primer y Segundo Ciclo de Corta en Bosques Tropicales de BoliviaDocumento Técnico 128/2003Santa Cruz, BoliviaProyecto BOLFORGoogle Scholar
EmmonsL. H. 1997Neotropical Rainforest Mammals: A Field Guide2d edChicagoChicago University PressGoogle Scholar
EspinozaG. B.Richards 2002Fundamentals of Environmental Impact AssessmentWashington, DCInter-American Development Bank (IDB) & Inter-American Association of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering (AIDIS)Google Scholar
FabeyM. 1997Free-Trade-Zone Status Turns Amazon Port into Boom Town.Global Logistics & Supply Chain StrategiesOnline. Available: http://www.glscs.com/archives/2.97.FTZ.htm?adcode=90. October 13, 2006Google Scholar
FearnsideP. M. 2005bIndigenous peoples as providers of environmental services in Amazonia: Warning signs from Mato Grosso.In HallA. (Ed.)Global Impact, Local Action: New Environmental Policy in Latin Americapp187198LondonUniversity of London School of Advanced Studies, Institute for the Study of the AmericasGoogle Scholar
FearnsideP. M. Graça 2006BR-319: Brazil's Manaus-Porto Velho highway and the potential impact of a migration corridor to Central Amazonia, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia-INPA, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.Ecological Society of AmericaMérida mexicoGoogle Scholar
FoglemanV. M. 1990Guide to the National Environmental Policy Act. Interpretations, Applications, and ComplianceNew YorkQuorum BooksGoogle Scholar
GlaserB. W. I.Woods (Eds.)2004Amazonian Dark Earths: Explorations in Space and TimeBerlinSpringer-VerlagGoogle Scholar
Global Mapping International 2006World Language Mapping SystemCDROM, Colorado Springs, COGlobal Mapping InternationalGoogle Scholar
GoeschlT. D. C.Igliori 2004Property Rights, Conservation and Development: An Analysis of Extractive Reserves in the Brazilian Amazon, Natural Resources Management(FEEM) Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei. Working Paper no. 60.04. Online. Available: http://www.feem.it/Feem/Pub/Publications/WPapers/default.htmGoogle Scholar
Gomez-RomeroE. T.Tamariz-Ortiz 1998Uso de la tierra y patrones de deforestacion en la zona de Iquitos.In KalliolaR. S.Flores-Paitan (Eds.)Geoecologia y Desarrollo AmazonicoSulkavaFinnreklama OyGoogle Scholar
GouldingM. 1980The Fishes and the Forest: Explorations in the Amazonian Natural HistoryBerkeleyUniversity of California PressGoogle Scholar
GouldingM. E. G.Ferreira 1996Pescarias Amazônicas, Porteção de Habitas e Fazendas nas Várzeas:Uma Visão Ecológica e EconômicaRelatório Banco Mundial. Brasília: BIRDGoogle Scholar
GouldingM. R.Barthem E.Ferreira 2003The Smithsonian Atlas of the AmazonWashington, DCSmithsonian Institution PressGoogle Scholar
GroganJ. E. P.Barreto A.Veríssimo 2002Mahogany in the Brazilian Amazon: Ecology and perspectives on managementBelém, Brazil(IMAZON) Amazon Institute of People and the EnvironmentGoogle Scholar
HaggettP. A. D.Cliff A.Frey 1977Locational Analysis in Human GeographyNew YorkWileyGoogle Scholar
HallA. 2004Extractive Reserves: Building Natural Assets in the Brazilian Amazon.Working Paper Series, no. 74Amherst, MA(PERI) Political Economy Research InstituteGoogle Scholar
HanaiM. 1998Formal and garimpo mining and the environment in Brazil.In WarhurstA. (Ed.)Mining and the Environment: Case Studies from the Americaspp181197OttowaInternational Development Research CenterOnline. Available: http://reseau.crdi.ca/en/ev-31006-201-1-DO_TOPIC.htmlGoogle Scholar
HarperG. J. M. K.Steininger Y.Talero M.Sanabria T. J.Killeen L. A.Solorzano 2007Deforestation Assessments Across the Andes.Online. Available: http://science.conservation.org/portal/server.pt?open=512&objID=755&&PageID=128505&mode=2&in_hi_userid=124186&cached=true. May 1, 2007Google Scholar
HechtS. B. A.Cockburn 1989The Fate of the Forest: Developers, Destroyers, and Defenders of the AmazonLondonVersoGoogle Scholar
HezelF. X. 2001The New Shape of Old Island CulturesHonoluluUniversity of Hawaii PressGoogle Scholar
(IBGE) Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estadística 2006Síntese de Indicadores Sociais 2006.Online. Available: http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/populacao/condicaodevida/indicadoresminimos/sinteseindicsociais2006/default.shtm. May 5, 2007Google Scholar
(IDB) Inter-American Development Bank 2006Building a New Continent: A Regional Approach to Strengthening South American InfrastructureWashingtonIDBOnline. Available: http://www.iadb.org/publications/Reports.cfm?language=en&parid=4. May, 15, 2007Google Scholar
(IPCC) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, Summary for PolicymakersContribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovenmental Panel on Climate ChangeGenevaIPCCOnline. Available: http://www.ipcc.ch/SPM2feb07.pdf. April 1, 2007Google Scholar
IUCN Commission on National Parks & Protected Areas & World Conservation Monitoring Centre 1994Guidelines for Protected Area Management CategoriesGland, SwitzerlandIUCNGoogle Scholar
KabatP. M.Claussen P. A.Dirmeyer J. H. C.Gash L.Bravo de Guenni M.Meybeck R. A.PielkeSr. C. J.Vorosmarty R. W. A.Hutjes S.Lutkemeier (Eds.)2004Vegetation, Water, Humans and the Climate: A New Perspective on an Interactive SystemBerlinSpringer VerlagGoogle Scholar
KaimowitzD. A.Angelsen 1998Economic Models of Tropical Deforestation: A ReviewBogorCenter for International Forestry ResearchGoogle Scholar
KalliolaR. S.Flores-Paitan 1998Geoecologia y desarolla Amazonico: Estudio integrado en la zona de Iquitos, PeruAnnales Universitatis Turkuensis, Ser A IITurku, FinlandTurku UniversityGoogle Scholar
KaltnerF. J. G. F. P.Azevedo I. A.Campos A. O. F.Mundim 2005Liquid Biofuels for Transportation in Brazil: Potential and Implications for Sustainable Agriculture and Energy in the 21st CenturySubmitted report by Fundação Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento Sustentável. Commissioned by The German Technical Cooperation. (GTZ) Online. Available: http://www.fbds.org.br/IMG/pdf/doc-116.pdf. April 2007Google Scholar
KilleenT. J. S. G.Beck E.Garcia 1993Guía de Arboles de BoliviaLa Paz, BoliviaHerbario Nacional de Bolivia & Missouri Botanical GardenGoogle Scholar
KilleenT. J. M.Douglas T.Consiglio P. M.Jørgensen 2007aWet spots and dry spots in the Andean Hotspot, the link between regional climate variability and biodiversity.Journal of BiogeopgraphyIn pressGoogle Scholar
KilleenT. J. V.Calderon L.Soria B.Quezada M. K.Steininger G.Harper L. A.Solórzano C. J.Tucker 2007bThirty Years of Land-Cover Change in Bolivia.AMBIOIn pressGoogle Scholar
LehmannJ. D. C.Kern B.Glaser W. I.Woods 2003Amazonian Dark Earths: Origin, Properties, ManagementDordrecht, The NetherlandsKluwerGoogle Scholar
LugoA. E. 2002Homoegeocene in Puerto Rico.In ZarinD. J. J. R R.Alavalapati F. E.Putz M.Schmink (Eds.)Working Forests in the Neotropics: Conservation through Sustainable Managementpp266276New YorkColumbia University PressGoogle Scholar
MacArthurR. H. E. O.Wilson 1967The Theory of Island BiogeographyPrinceton, NJPrinceton University PressGoogle Scholar
MachadoR. M. B.Ramos-Neto M. B.Harris R.Lourival L. M. S.Aguiar 2004Análise de lacunas de proteção da biodiversidade no Cerrado.InAnais IV Congresso Brasileiro de Unidades de Conservaçãopp2938Curitiba, BrasilBrasil Fundação O Boticário de Proteção à NaturezaGoogle Scholar
MachadoR. B. M. B. R.Neto J. M. C.Silva R. B.Cavalcanti 2007Cerrado deforestation and its effects on biodiversity conservation.In KlinkC. A. R. B.Cavalcanti R.Defries (Eds.)Cerrado Land-Use and Conservation: Balancing Human and Ecological NeedsApplied Advances in Biodiversity Science, no. 8Washington, DCCenter for Applied Biodiversity Science, Conservation International (CI)(In press)Google Scholar
MalhiY. J.Wright 2005Late twentieth-century patterns and trends in the climate of tropical forest regions.In MalhiY. O. L.Phillips (Eds.)Tropical Forests & Global Atmospheric Changepp316OxfordOxford University PressGoogle Scholar
MannC. 20051491: New Revelations of the Americas before ColumbusNew YorkKnopfGoogle Scholar
MargulisS. 2004Causes of Deforestation in the Brazilian AmazonBrasiliaWorld BankGoogle Scholar
MaslinM. 2005The longevity and resilience of the Amazon rainforest.In MahliY. O. L.Phillips (Eds.)Tropical Forests & Global Atmospheric Changepp167183OxfordOxford University PressGoogle Scholar
MayleF. E. M. E.Bush 2005Amazonian ecosystems and atmospheric change since the last gl;acial maximum.In MalhiY. O. L.Phillips (Eds.)Tropical Forests & Global Atmospheric Changepp183191OxfordOxford University PressGoogle Scholar
MertesL. A. K. E. M. L.Novo D. L.Daniel Y. E.Shimabukuro J. E.Richey T.Krug 1996Classification of Rios Solimoes-Amazonas wetlands through application of spectral mixture analysis to landsat thematic mapper data.VIII Simposio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento RemotoSalvador, BrazilGoogle Scholar
MoriS. A. G. T.Prance 1990Lecythidaceae - part II: The zygomorphic-flowered New World genera (Couroupita, Corythophora, Bertholletia, Couratari, Eschweilera, & Lecythis).Flora Neotropica Monographno. 21Bronx, NYNew York Botanical GardenGoogle Scholar
NairU. S. D. K.Ray R. O.Lawton R. M.Welch R. A.PielkeSr. J.Calvo The impact of deforestation on orographic cloud formation in a complex tropical environment.In BruijnzeelL. A. J.Juvik F. N.Scatena L. S.Hamilton P.Bubb (Eds.)Mountains in the Mist: Science for Conserving and Managing Tropical Montane Cloud ForestsHonoluluUniversity of Hawaii PressIn PressGoogle Scholar
OrtizE. 2005Conservation Biology of Brazil-nut Rich ForestsWashingtonSmithsonian InstitutionGoogle Scholar
PachecoP. 1998Estilos de Desarrollo, deforestación y Degradación de Los Bosques en Las Tierras Bajas de BoliviaLa PazCIFOR, CEDLA, Fundacion TIERRAGoogle Scholar
PartidárioM. R. 1999Strategic environmental assessment: Principles and potential.In PettsJ. Handbook on Environmental Impact Assessmentpp6073LondonBlackwellGoogle Scholar
PartidárioM. R. R.Clark 2000Perspectives on Strategic Environmental AssessmentBoca Raton, FLCRC PressGoogle Scholar
PattonJ. L. M. N. F.da Silva 1998Rivers, refuges, and ridges: The geography of speciation of Amazonian mammals.In HowardD. J. S. H.Berlocher Endless Forms: Species and Speciationpp202213OxfordOxford University PressGoogle Scholar
PearceD. W. 1994Economic Value BiodiversityLondonJames & Jame, EarthscanGoogle Scholar
PenningtonT. 1997The Genus Inga – BotanyLondonRoyal Botanic Gardens, KewGoogle Scholar
PenningtonR. T. M.Lavin D. E.Prado C. A.Pendry S. K.Pell 2005Climate change and speciation in Neotropical seasonally forest plants.In MalhiY. O. L.Phillips Tropical Forests & Global Atmospheric Changepp191198OxfordOxford University PressGoogle Scholar
PowersM. 2002Illegal loggers invade primordial indigenous natives.Environment News ServiceOnline. Available: http://www.ensnewswire.com/ens/aug2002/2002-08-09-01.asp. August 9, 2002Google Scholar
PranceG. T. 1972ChrysobalanaceaeFlora Neotropica Monograph, no. 9New YorkPublished for Organization for Flora Neotropica by HafnerGoogle Scholar
PranceG. T. 1989Chrysobalanaceae: SupplementFlora Neotropica. Monograph, no. 9SNew YorkOrganizaiton for Flora NeotropicaGoogle Scholar
(PROMPEX) Peruvian Export Promotion Agency 2006Boletines Sectoriales de Exportación: Enero – Marzo 2006.Online.Available: http://www.prompex.gob.pe/Prompex/Portal/Sector/DefaultSector.aspx?.menuId=3Google Scholar
PutzF. E. M. A.Pinard T. S.Fredericksen M.Peña-Claros 2004Forest science and the BOLFOR experience: Lessons learned about natural forest management in Bolivia.In ZarinD. J. J. R. R.Alavalapati F. E.Putz M.Schmink Working Forests in the Neotropics: Conservation through Sustainable Managementpp6496New YorkColumbia University PressGoogle Scholar
RatterJ. A. S.Bridgewater J. F.Ribeiro 2006Biodiversity patterns of the woody vegetation of the Brazilian Cerrados.In PenningtonR. T. G.Lewis J. A.Ratter Neotropical Savannas and Dry Forests: Plant Diversity, Biogeography and ConservationBoca Raton, FLCRC PressGoogle Scholar
RedwoodIII.J. 2002World Bank Approaches to the Brazilian Amazon: The Bumpy Road toward Sustainable Development.Latin America and Caribbean Region Sustainable Development Working Paper, no. 13. Washington: The World BankOnline. Available:http://wbln0018.worldbank.org/.../b8234d558447e77e85256ccd005dbbc5/$FILE/redwood%Google Scholar
ReidW. V. S. A.Laird R.Gamez A.Sittenfeld D. H.Janzen M. A.Gollin C.Juma 1993A new lease on life.In ReidW. V. S. A.Laird C. A.Meyer R.Gamez A.Sittenfeld D. H.Janzen M. A.Gollin C.Juma Biodiversity Prospecting: Guidelines for Using Genetic and Biochemical Resources Sustainably and Equitablypp152WashingtonWorld Resources InstituteGoogle Scholar
Reuters 2007South American Heads Meet in Brazil.January 7. Online. Available at http://www.reuters.com/news/video/videoStory?videoId=30147Google Scholar
RicardoF. A.Rolla 2006Mineração em Unidades de Conservação na Amazônia BrasileiraSão PauloInstituto SocioambientalGoogle Scholar
RiceD. C. A.Sugal S. M.Ratay G. A. B.da Fonseca 2001Sustainable Forest Management: A Review of Conventional WisdomAdvances in Applied Biodiversity Science, no. 3Washington DCCenter for Applied Biodiversity Science at Conservation InternationalGoogle Scholar
RosenfeldA. B. D. L.Gordon M.Guerin-McManus 1997Reinventing the Well Approaches to Minimizing the Environmental and Social Impact of Oil Development in the TropicsWashington, DCConservation InternationalGoogle Scholar
RosenthalJ. P. 1997Equitable sharing of biodiversity benefits: Agreements on genetic resources.InInvesting In Biological Diversity: Proceedings of the Cairns Conferencepp253274ParisOrganisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)Google Scholar
RuffinoM. L. 2001Strategies for Managing Biodiversity in Amazonian FisheriesManaus, BrazilThe Brazilian Environmental and Renewable Natural Resources Institute (IBAMA)Online. Available: http://www.unep.org/bpsp/HTML%20files/TS-Fisheries2.htmlGoogle Scholar
RylandsA. B. M.Fonseca R.Machado R.Cavalcanti 2005Brazil.In SpaldingM. S.Chape M.Jenkins The State of the World's Protected AreasCambridgeUnited Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and World Conservation Monitoring Centre (WCMC)Google Scholar
SchaeferS. 2000Fishes of Inundated Tropical Savannas: Diversity and Endemism in the Serrania Huanchaca of Eastern BoliviaFinal report sponsored by The American Museum Center for Biodiversity and Conservation. Online. Available: http://126.96.36.199/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=cache:h-ivoaIKpAJ:research.amnh.org/ichthyology/bolivia.pdf+Schaefer+Fishes+Tropical+inundatedGoogle Scholar
SchwartzmanS. 1985Banking on disaster.Multinational Monitor67Online. Available: http://www.multinationalmonitor.org/hyper/issues/1985/0615/schwartzman.htmlGoogle Scholar
SmithD. N. T. J.Killeen 1998A comparison of the structure and composition of montane and lowland tropical forest in the Serranía Pilón Lajas, Beni, Bolivia.In DallmeierF. J. A.Comiskey Forest Biodiversity in North, Central and South America and the Caribbean: Research and MonitoringMan and the Biosphere Series, no. 22pp681700Carnforth, UKUNESCO, The Parthenon Publishing GroupGoogle Scholar
StebbinsG. L. 1950Variation and evolution in plantsNew YorkColumbia University PressGoogle Scholar
StewardJ. H. 1948Handbook of South American Indians. Vol. 3. The Forest TribesWashington, DCBureau of American Ethnography & The Smithsonian InstitutionGoogle Scholar
StotzD. F. J. W.Fitzpatrick T. A.ParkerIII D. K.Moskovits 1996Neotropical Birds: Ecology and ConservationChicagoUniversity of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
TierneyP. 2000Darkness in El Dorado: How Scientists and Journalists Devastated the AmazonNew YorkWW Norton and CompanyGoogle Scholar
TreeceD. 1988Brutality and Brazil: The Human Cost of Cheap Steel.Multinational Monitor92Online. Available: http://multinationalmonitor.org/hyper/issues/1988/02/mm0288_08.html#nameGoogle Scholar
TrollC. 1968The Cordilleras of the Tropical Americas: Aspects of Climatic, Phytogeographical and Agrarian EcologyBonnFerd DümmlersGoogle Scholar
(UNFCCC) United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 2006Background Paper for the Workshop on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation in Developing Countries30 August – 1 September 2006. Rome, Italy. Online. Available: http://unfccc.int/methods_and_science/lulucf/items/3757.phpGoogle Scholar
VeigaM. M. 1997Mercury in Artisanal Gold Mining in Latin America: Facts, Fantasies and Solutions.UNIDO -Expert Group Meeting: Introducing new technologies for abatement of global mercury pollution deriving from artisanal gold miningVienna. July 1–3. Online. Available: http://www.facome.uqam.ca/. November 5, 2006Google Scholar
WanderlyI. F. R. L.Fonseca P. G.Pereira P.do A. C.Prado A.de A. B.Oliveira F. P.Barbosa F.Panciera 2007Implicações da Iniciativa de Integração da Infraestrutura Regional Sulamericana e projetos correlacionados na política de conservação no Brasil.InPolítica Ambiental, no. 3BrasíliaConservation InternationalOnline. Available: http://www.conservacao.org/publicacoes/index.php?t=5Google Scholar
WarhurstA. 1998Mining and the Environment: Case Studies from the AmericasOttowaInternational Development Research CenterGoogle Scholar
World Bank 1991Environmental Assessment SourcebookVol. 1Policies, Procedures, and Cross-sectoral Issues. World Bank Technical Paper Number 139Washington, DCWorld BankGoogle Scholar
World Bank 2003aA Common Framework: Converging Requirements of Multilateral Financial Institutions No. 1, Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)WashingtonWorld BankOnline. Available: http://www1.worldbank.org/harmonization/romehlf/Background/MFI%20Final%20Jan17%202003-Eng.pdf. May 15, 2007Google Scholar
World Bank 2006Finding Sustainable Ways to Extract Forest Products in the Amazon.Pilot Program Extractive Reserves ProjectOnline. Available: http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/LACEXT/BRAZILEXTN/0,,contentMDK:20754543~pagePK:141137~piPK:141127~theSitePK:322341,00.html. June 1, 2007Google Scholar
 81 The original recommendation estimated around $60 million for the Environmental Action Plan, representing approximately 20 percent of the total cost of the highway construction; the plan was eventually financed by the IDB with a budget of $21 million. Implementation experienced a 3-year delay as the IDB and government agencies negotiated over the management of the program. See http://www.snc.gov.bo/obras/corredores/index.html.
 82 Recently, CAF ($10 million) and the Peruvian government ($7million) committed to implementing an environmental action plan for the southern corridor, which included about $1 million for a strategic environmental assessment.
 83 CONDOR was developed by Conservation International (http://www.caf.com/view/index.asp?pageMs=14890&ms=11).
 84 In contrast to CAF and IDB, FONPLATA provides no information on its portal regarding environmental policy.
 85 Recently, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) required that Ecuador proceed on construction of the OCP pipeline to assure long-term economic growth; the OCP will impact Amazonian tropical forest, but the IMF does not engage in environmental evaluation for its loans for macroeconomic measures (pers. comm., Rosanna Andia, Bank Information Center).
 86 Examples include the environmental action plan for the Corridor Puerto Suarez–Santa Cruz and The Sustainable Development Plan for BR-163.