Six field trials were conducted over a two-year period (2014, 2015) to determine the level and consistency of glyphosate-resistant (GR) Canada fleabane control with glyphosate plus saflufenacil plus a third tankmix partner. GR Canada fleabane interference reduced soybean yield 73% compared with the weed free control. At 4 and 8 weeks after application (WAA), glyphosate plus saflufenacil provided 99% and 88% control of GR Canada fleabane respectively, and at 8 WAA, reduced GR Canada fleabane density by 96% and biomass by 89%. Glyphosate plus saflufenacil plus dicamba improved the control of GR Canada fleabane to 100% and 97% at 4 and 8 WAA, respectively. At 8 WAA, glyphosate plus saflufenacil plus amitrole reduced GR Canada fleabane density and biomass 99% and 97%, respectively. At 8 WAA, glyphosate plus saflufenacil plus dicamba at 300 or 600 g a.i. ha-1 reduced GR Canada fleabane biomass 97% and 98%, respectively. Tank-mixing dicamba with glyphosate plus saflufenacil applied pre-plant improved control of GR Canada fleabane; however, this caused 14% and 46% crop injury at 2 and 4 WAA, respectively. Soybean yield for saflufenacil alone and saflufenacil tankmix treatments were similar to the weed free control, with the exception of dicamba (600 g a.i. ha-1).
How to translate text using browser tools
10 May 2016
Control of glyphosate resistant Canada fleabane with saflufenacil plus tankmix partners in soybean
Christopher M. Budd,
Nader Soltani,
Darren E. Robinson,
David C. Hooker,
Robert T. Miller,
Peter H. Sikkema
ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE
It is not available for individual sale.
This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
It is not available for individual sale.
biomass
biomasse
Canada fleabane
Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq.
Glyphosate
Herbicide resistance
rendement