In the article TANANI, M. A., K. S. GHONEIM AND KH. SH. HAMADAH—Comparative Effects of Certain IGRs on the Carbohydrates of Hemolymph and Fat Body of the Desert Locust, Schistocerca gregaria (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Florida Entomol. 95(4): 928–935, the following footnotes should be inserted in Tables 4 and 5, respectively:

Table 4 footnote - Cone: concentration; mean ± SD followed with the letter (a): is not significantly different (P > 0.05), (b): significantly different (P < 0.05), (c): highly significantly different (P< 0.01) and (d): very highly significantly different (P < 0.001). =: adults died.

Table 5 footnote - Conc.: concentration; mean ± SD followed with the letter (a): is not significantly different (P > 0.05) and (b): significantly different (P < 0.05). =: adults died.

In the article OLMSTEAD, DANIEL L. AND ANTHONY M. SHELTON. 2012. Evaluation of Insecticide Chemistries against the Leek Moth (Lepidoptera: Acrolepiidae), a New Pest in North America. Florida Entomol. 95(4): 1127–1131, values in the third column, “Rate g (AI)/ha,” of table 1 are incorrect. The correct values, in descending order, are 35.0 (Warrior II), 87.6 (Radiant SC), 1008.8 (Lannate LV), 73.1 (Coragen SC), 168.1 (Entrust), 1120.8 (Agree WG), 20.8 (Neemix 4.5), and 605.3 (DiPel DF). The label rates in the second column are correct as printed. The errors reported in the third column do not affect reported results on mortality in columns 4 through 6.

"Errata," Florida Entomologist 96(1), 300, (1 March 2013). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.096.0155
Published: 1 March 2013
Back to Top