Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2013 Release and Establishment of the Little Decapitating Fly Pseudacteon cultellatus (Diptera: Phoridae) on Imported Fire Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Florida
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The little decapitating fly Pseudacteon cultellatus Borgmeier (Diptera: Phoridae) from Argentina was released as a self-sustaining biological control agent against the red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta Buren (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Florida to parasitize small fire ant workers associated with multiple-queen colonies. This fly appears to be established at 2 of 5 release sites, but populations still remain very low (≤ 1% of total Pseudacteon flies) and localized more than 2 yr after their release. Further releases of P. cultellatus in the United States should be limited to a few additional sites in different habitats or climatic regions where this fly might be more successful.

Imported fire ants (Solenopsis spp.; Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in North America have population densities 5-10 times higher than those normally found in their South American homelands (Porter et al. 1992, 1997). Escape from numerous natural enemies left behind in South America is a likely reason for intercontinental differences in fire ant abundance (Porter et al. 1997).

The little decapitating fly (Pseudacteon cultellatus Borgmeier; Diptera: Phoridae; Fig. 1) was selected for release as a self-sustaining biological control agent for imported Solenopsis fire ants in the United States because this species parasitizes the smallest sizes of fire ant workers. Small fire ant workers are the most abundant size class in fire ant colonies, especially in young colonies (Porter & Tschinkel 1985a, 1985b) and in multiple-queen or “polygyne” colonies (Greenberg et al. 1985). Polygyne fire ant colonies are found in about 10–15% of the imported fire ant range in the United States, except in Texas where 50% of the state has multiple-queen fire ants (Porter et al. 1991; Porter 1992; Porter et al. 1992).

Fig. 1.

Male and female Pseudacteon cultellatus decapitating flies (left). A posterior view of the ovipositor (right) by which female flies are easily identified (Porter & Pesquero 2001). The male can be distinguished in the United States by its small size, triangular anal tube, and a dark-brown hairy antenna with a narrow curved apical extension. The gray scale line is 0.5 mm (left) and 0.2 mm (right).

f01_1567.jpg

Like other Pseudacteon flies, when P. cultellatus maggots are ready to pupate, they decapitate their host workers and use the newly emptied host head capsules as pupal cases (Porter 1998). All Pseudacteon species that attack fire ants, including P. cultellatus, appear to be specific to Solenopsis fire ants (Porter & Gilbert 2004; SDP unpublished data).

The natural geographic range of P. cultellatus in South America is from Buenos Aires, Argentina, north through Corrientes, Argentina, then northeast into Brazil through the states of Parana and São Paulo to the states of Minas Gerais and Goias (Patrock et al. 2009). In South America, this species is known to attack both red and black fire ants (i.e.; Solenopsis invicta Buren and Solenopsis richteri Forel) and probably Solenopsis saevissima F. Smith as well. The most abundant populations were found in gaps in subtropical gallery forest habitats (Calcaterra et al. 2005). The climatic preferences of P. cultellatus flies are rather broad ranging from tropical to temperate; consequently, its potential range in the United States could be anywhere imported fire ants are found.

Five species of phorid decapitating flies have been released and established as fire ant biocontrol agents in the United States: Pseudacteon tricuspis Borgmeier (Callcott et al. 2011), Pseudacteon curvatus Borgmeier (Callcott et al. 2011), Pseudacteon litoralis Borgmeier (Porter et al. 2011), Pseudacteon obtusus Borgmeier, (Gilbert et al. 2008; Porter & Calcaterra 2013), and Pseudacteon nocens Borgmeier (Plowes et al. 2012).

The objective of this paper is to document the release of P. cultellatus, a sixth species of fire ant decapitating fly, at 5 sites in Florida and the establishment of this fly at 2 of these sites.

Materials and Methods

The original P. cultellatus flies used in this study were collected in Dec 2006 from a marsh area along the Parana River (∼2,700 flies) about 20 km NE of Corrientes, Argentina (S 27.371° W 58.687°) and from a picnic/camping area (∼2,000 flies) about 20 km SE of Corrientes (S 27.559° W 58.725°). Most of the host ants at these sites were S. invicta, but local biotypes of S. invicta were probably not as similar to US biotypes as those found further north along the Paraguay River in the province of Formosa (Ascunce et al. 2011). Immature stages of P. cultellatus were carried to a USDA quarantine facility in Gainesville, Florida in parasitized hosts accompanied by an Argentine export permit (DFS N°19517) and a USDA/ APHIS import permit (#64943).

Prior to field release in 2010, the flies were mass reared on red imported fire ants from the United States using large attack boxes (1 m wide × 2-2.5 m long × 0.7 m high) with either 8 or 14 smaller attack trays similar to those described by Vogt et al. (2003) except that humidity was controlled by a vaporizer in a chamber mounted under the attack chamber. Every morning, new flies emerged from pupation trays directly into the attack chamber where they could parasitize worker ants, which were trailing back and forth between 2 cups as they were automatically raised and lowered in each of the attack trays. Flies were allowed to parasitize workers for 3 or 4 days before the workers were removed. Photographs of attack boxes as well as notes and photographs about rearing procedures can be viewed in Supplementary Material for this article in Florida Entomologist 96(3) (2013) online at  http://purl.fcla.edu/fcla/entomologist/browse, as well as at  http://www.ars.usda.gov/saa/cmave/ifahi/cultellatus. Extensive care was necessary when rearing P. cultellatus to limit contamination from workers already parasitized with P. curvatus flies in the field (see Supplementary Material for details).

Fire ant workers used in the attack boxes were obtained from field colonies because workers from laboratory colonies proved unsuitable for fly development if they had been infected by the SINV-3 virus (SDP - unpublished data), which at that time was a major problem in our rearing facility (Porter et al. 2013; Valles & Porter 2013). We used only the smallest fire ant workers for hosts because this improved production efficiency and limited contamination from other Pseudacteon species, which parasitize medium- and large-sized workers. A second major rearing problem was that fire ant workers frequently chewed out fire ant head capsules with newly pupated flies, thus killing the pupae and greatly reducing productivity of the fly culture. This problem was mitigated by collecting dead fire ant workers with pupating larvae 6 days a week, using larger holding boxes for parasitized workers, and providing darkened nests for the workers so fewer workers were active in the holding box (see Supplementary Material above).

Field releases were conducted at 5 sites in Florida beginning in the spring of 2010 (Table 1). Sites were selected which contained large populations of fire ants (probably 1500-3000 workers/ m2; Macom & Porter 1996) with small workers like those associated with polygyne colonies. The sites were all in open disturbed areas, but releases were conducted using mounds as close as possible to bushes, trees, and water sources to ensure refugia for the fire ants and flies in case of drought or hot weather (Plowes et al. 2011). The 4 releases conducted in 2010 (Table 1) used larvae in parasitized ants as was previously done with P. curvatus (for details see: Graham et al. 2003; Vazquez et al. 2006). The 2011 release (Table 1) was done by burying P. cultellatus pupae in an insolated box with an exit pipe in the top similar to the method described by Plowes et al. (2012). Our implementation of this method needed improvements because about one quarter of the 13,600 release flies were trapped in the crack between the cooler box and its lid. Also, cool ground temperatures (15-20 °C) in the early spring delayed emergence of the flies longer than was desirable. In May 2010, 2 attempts were made to release adult flies over disturbed fire ant mounds as was done with P. tricuspis (Porter et al. 2004), but the P. cultellatus flies dispersed rapidly (within 5–15 min) without attacking many fire ants so further attempts were discontinued.

Table 1.

Data for the field release of the fire ant decapitating fly Pseudacteon cultellatus at four sites near gainesville, Florida and one site in Miami-Dade County near Miami, Florida.

t01_1567.gif

Sticky tri-stand traps in 150 × 25 mm Petri dishes were used to monitor the establishment of flies at release sites (Puckett et al. 2007; Porter & Calcaterra 2013). Petri dishes were coated on the inside with a Fluon-like suspension of fluoropolymer resin (Daikin Polyflon PTFE DX-9025; Daikin America, Inc., Orangeburg, New York) and placed in fire ant mounds so disturbed workers would fall into the dish and not be able to escape. Sometimes additional fire ant workers were added from lab colonies if ant numbers were too small to reliably attract phorid flies.

Voucher specimens of P. cultellatus and the other Pseudacteon species have been deposited in the Florida State Collection of Arthropods, Division of Plant Industries, Florida Department of Agriculture, Gainesville, Florida, and the Museo de Ciencias Naturales de La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Results

The little decapitating fly, P. cultellatus, was established at 2 of 5 release sites in Florida (Table 1). Flies were first released at the University of Florida Organic Gardens site in the spring of 2010 around the edge of a pond. Several first-generation field-reared flies were recovered in June 2010, but no additional P. cultellatus flies were found on 6 subsequent dates in Aug and Sep so an additional fall release was conducted. Several likely first-generation field-reared flies were recovered at the end of Oct 2010. Additional flies have been recovered on 11 of 26 different occa sions from Mar 2011 to May 2013, more than 30 months after the fall 2010 release (Table 1).

By the end of the first yr (fall 2011), flies had expanded outward about 200 m from the release site in 3 of 4 directions (E, W, S). No additional expansion was observed at the end of the second yr (fall 2012), but a fly was found out 500 m in the fourth direction (N) in spring 2013. Flies were found on 3 of 8 trap dates in 2012 and 2 of 3 dates for the spring of 2013. The relative abundance of P. cultellatus has remained very low at the Organic Garden site from 2010–2013 (0.3–0.7%; Table 2).

Pseudacteon cultellatus was also established at a highly disturbed former mulch site adjacent to a major canal in the Everglades restoration area southwest of Miami, Florida (Table 1). The first P. cultellatus fly recovered at this site was in Aug 2011, 8 months after the releases concluded. Extensive trapping in and around this release site on 10 Jan 2012 failed to find either P. cultellatusor evidence of its expansion. However, 4 flies were found in Apr 2012 and 6 more flies were found in May 2013 (28 months after the releases). As with the previous site, P. cultellatus females only accounted for a small fraction of the total female Pseudacteon flies collected (0.2–1.0%; Table 2). We did not attempt to monitor fly expansion out of this release site in 2013 because of logistical constraints.

Releases of P. cultellatus appear to have failed at 3 additional sites near Gainesville, Florida (Table 1). Several field-reared flies were trapped at each site 1-5 months after release; however, no additional flies have been found since, despite 13, 9, and 7 additional trapping dates over periods of 29, 21, and 30 months for the Waldo Ballpark, Waldo Storage, and Hawthorn sites, respectively. We were not able to discern any critical habitat differences between the 2 successful and 3 unsuccessful sites. Weather conditions during the releases and monitoring were not unusually extreme.

Trap data from the 4 release sites in the Gainesville area (Table 2) show P. curvatus was the most abundant species, accounting for about 91% of total female decapitating flies (range: 83-100% by date) followed by P. obtusus with about 8% (range: 0–17%). Like P. cultellatus, P. tricuspis was rarely captured at the Gainesville release sites. At the release site near Miami, P. tricuspis accounted for about 20% (range 0.6–27%) of total female flies with P. curvatus making up most of the remainder (Table 2).

Females accounted for 52% (1,344/2,565) of total P. obtusus flies trapped in the Gainesville area while females accounted for only 36% (609/1,674) of total P. tricuspis flies trapped at the site near Miami. More than 99% of P. curvatus flies trapped were females and all of the P. cultellatus flies were females because males of both species do not mate with females while they are ovipositing in fire ant workers.

Discussion

The little decapitating fly P. cultellatus appears to be established in Florida because populations have persisted for more than 2 yr at each of 2 release sites (Table 1). The P. cultellatus bio-type that we released clearly finds S. invicta from the United States a suitable host, unlike the P . curvatus biotype from black fire ants, which was released 7 times on red fire ants in Florida without any of the releases establishing (Graham et al. 2003). Nevertheless, P. cultellatus populations remain very low (Table 2) and expansion rates, so far, appear to be limited to a few hundred m. About 91% of the female flies collected in this study were P. curvatus, similar to the results of Porter & Calcaterra (2013) in 2009–2010, while almost all of the remaining females were P. obtusus. The once abundant P. tricuspis continued to be trapped throughout the study, but only at extremely low levels (Table 2). Curiously, P. tricuspis accounted for about 20% of females trapped at the release site near Miami (Table 2), thus demonstrating that, while P. tricuspis generally does poorly in competition with P. curvatus (LeBrun et al. 2009; Porter & Calcaterra 2013), in some areas and seasons this is not true.

Table 2.

Percent species composition of Pseudacteon females trapped during monitoring at P. cultellatus release sites shown by year.

t02_1567.gif

Expansion rates for other Pseudacteon species released in the United States have been quite variable with some fly populations showing little or no expansion for 1–3 yr while other populations have expanded several kilometers in the first yr and up to 50 km/yr in subsequent years (Porter et al. 2004; Henne et al. 2007; LeBrun et al. 2008; Porter 2010; Porter et al. 2011). Slow spread of P. cultellatus is probably a result of low population densities and perhaps a low natural rate of dispersal. Competition with the very abundant P . curvatus is likely a major factor affecting population densities because P. curvatus depressed P . tricuspis populations in large parts of Texas and Florida (LeBrun et al. 2009; Porter & Calcaterra 2013). Competition with P. curvatus and perhaps P. obtusus is also a likely reason why we were only able to establish flies at 2 of 5 release sites (Table 1). Plowes et al. (2011) report that success rates of establishing P. obtusus in Texas were reduced by the presence of P. curvatus and P. tricuspis at their release sites.

The ultimate fate of the P. cultellatus releases in Florida is unknown. Drought or other extreme weather conditions combined with strong competition from preexisting species may eventually lead to extinction of what are currently small and localized populations. If P. cultellatus is able to disperse from our release sites, it may remain as a rare species in most areas with some locally abundant populations as is currently the case for P. litoralis in Alabama (Porter et al. 2011). After passing through a latent phase (Henne et al. 2007), P. cultellatus may eventually become a more abundant fly once it adapts to local conditions and fly populations become large enough to ensure easy mating and dispersal. Populations of a P. curvatus biotype from red fire ants remained so low at 2 release sites in Florida that none were recovered for almost a yr; however, eventually their numbers increased dramatically and rapid expansion followed (Vazquez et al. 2006; Porter 2010). Similar results have also been reported for P. tricuspis in Louisiana (Henne et al. 2007). The prediction was that P. cultellatus would do especially well with polygyne fire ant hosts because polygyne colonies have much smaller workers on average than monogyne colonies (Greenberg et al. 1985). Current data is not sufficient to evaluate this prediction; however, the presence of colonies with small workers at each of the release sites did not ensure successful establishment. The release site near Miami contains what appear to be mostly polygyne colonies with a predominance of small workers, but the Organic Garden site in Gainesville has become almost entirely monogyne since the original releases.

Around Corrientes, Argentina, P. cultellatus is only locally abundant where it was originally collected. Differences in habitat, hosts, or the presence of small polygyne workers are possible explanations. However, the relative abundance of Pseudacteon species in South America is not correlated well with the abundance of Pseudacteon species, which have been established in the United States (Porter & Calcaterra 2013). Pseudacteon cultellatus is currently being reared by USDA/APHIS for release in additional states in hopes that it may do better in other habitats or climates. Nevertheless, only a few more releases are probably justified unless at least some of these releases result in vigorous localized P. cultellatus populations.

To date, 6 species of Pseudacteon decapitating flies have been released against the red imported fire ant (S. invicta) in the United States and each have shown different levels of establishment and dispersal. While additional candidate species remain in South America (Patrock et al. 2009), P. cultellatus will probably be the last Pseudacteon species our group will release against S. invicta. Most of the remaining species are either too rare to be reliably collected, too difficult to rear in quarantine, and/or of questionable host association with the US biotype of S. invicta. Several small Pseudacteon species, which attack fire ants along trails, may be useful if other research groups can find effective ways to rear and/ or release them in the United States. We are still contemplating releasing 1–2 Pseudacteon species against black imported fire ants (S. richteri) and hybrid fire ants in Tennessee and the northern parts of Mississippi, Alabama, and Georgia, but our research efforts are beginning to shift to other potential groups of agents, especially viruses and microsporidian pathogens (Poinar et al. 2007; Oi et al. 2010; Valles 2012; Porter et al. 2013).

Acknowledgments

Darrell Hall (USDA-ARS, Gainesville) is thanked for his assistance with ant rearing, field releases, and monitoring efforts. Cynthia Vann (USDA-ARS, Gainesville) is thanked for managing fly rearing efforts. Field release of P. cultellatus would not have been possible if Charlie Brown (USDA-APHIS, PPQ, Riverdale, Maryland) had not personally shepherded a FONSI (Finding of No Significant Impact) through regulatory channels. Orlando Coy (South Florida Water Management District) and Dallas Hazelton (Miami-Dade County Park and Recreation Dept.) guided us in finding potential release sites in the Miami area. Jason Smith (South Florida Water Management District) is thanked for his persistent efforts in obtaining approval for fly releases on Water Management District land. DeWayne Shoemaker (USDA-ARS, Gainesville), Kelly Loftin, Sim Barrow (both Univ. of Arkansas), and two anonymous reviewers read a draft of this paper and provided valuable comments. A Porter family fund covered unexpected international travel and shipping expenses for the flies. Funding provided by USDA-APHIS, PPQ assisted substantially with rearing and release efforts.

References Cited

1.

M. S. Ascunce , C. C. Yang , J. Oakey , L. Calcaterra , W. J. Wu , C. J. Shih , T., J. Goudet , K. G. Ross , and D. Shoemaker 2011. Global invasion history of the fire Ant Solenopsis invicta. Science 331: 1066–1068. Google Scholar

2.

L. A. Calcaterra , S. D. Porter , and J. A. Briano 2005. Distribution and abundance of fire ant decapitating flies (Diptera: Phoridae: Pseudacteon), in three regions of southern South America. Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 98: 85–95. Google Scholar

3.

A.-M. A. Callcott , S. D. Porter , R. D. Weeks Jr ., L. C. Graham , S. J. Johnson , and L. E. Gilbert 2011. Fire ant decapitating fly cooperative release programs (1994–2008): Two Pseudacteon species (P. tricuspis, P. curvatus) rapidly expand across imported fire ant populations in the southeastern United States. J. Insect Sci. (available online: insectscience.org/11.19): 1–25. Google Scholar

4.

L. E. Gilbert , C. Barr , A. A. Calixto , J. L. Cook , B. M. Drees , E. G. Lebrun , R. J. W. Patrock , R. Plowes , S. D. Porter , and R. T. Puckett 2008. Introducing phorid fly parasitoids of red imported fire ant workers from South America to Texas: Outcomes vary by region and by Pseudacteon species released. Southwest. Entomol. 33: 15–29. Google Scholar

5.

L. C. Graham , S. D. Porter , R. M. Pereira , H. D. Dorough , and A. T. Kelley 2003. Field releases of the decapitating fly Pseudacteon curvatus (Diptera: Phoridae) for control of imported fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Alabama, Florida, and Tennessee. Florida Entomol. 86: 334–339. Google Scholar

6.

L. Greenberg , D. J. C. Fletcher , and S. B. Vinson 1985. Differences in worker size and mound distribution in monogynous and polygynous colonies of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta Buren. J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 58: 9–18. Google Scholar

7.

D. C. Henne , S. J. Johnson , and J. T. Cronin 2007. Population spread of the introduced red-imported fire ant parasitoid, Pseudacteon tricuspis Borgmeier (Diptera: Phoridae), in Louisiana. Biol. Control 42: 97–104. Google Scholar

8.

E. G. LeBrun , R. M. Plowes , and L. E. Gilbert 2008. Dynamic expansion in recently introduced populations of fire ant parasitoids (Diptera: Phoridae). Biol. Invasions 10: 989–999. Google Scholar

9.

E. G. LeBrun , R. M. Plowes , and L. E. Gilbert 2009. Indirect competition facilitates widespread displacement of one naturalized parasitoid of imported fire ants by another. Ecology 90: 1184–1194. Google Scholar

10.

T. E. Macom , and S. D. Porter 1996. Comparison of polygyne and monogyne red imported fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) population densities. Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 89: 535–543. Google Scholar

11.

D. H. Oi , S. M. Valles , and J. A. Briano 2010. Laboratory host specificity testing of the fire ant microsporidian pathogen Vairimorpha invictae (Microporidia: Burenellidae). Biol. Control 53: 331–336. Google Scholar

12.

R. J. W. Patrock , S. D. Porter , L. E. Gilbert , and P. J. Folgarait 2009. Distributional patterns of Pseudacteon associated with the Solenopsis saevissima complex in South America. J. Insect Sci. 9:60, 17 pp. (available online:  insectscience.org/9.60 ). Google Scholar

13.

R. M. Plowes , P. J. Folgarait , and L. E. Gilbert 2012. The introduction of the fire ant parasitoid Pseudacteon nocens in North America: challenges when establishing small populations. BioControl 57: 503–514. Google Scholar

14.

R. M. Plowes , E. G. Lebrun , and L. E. Gilbert 2011. Introduction of the fire ant decapitating fly Pseudacteon obtusus in the United States: factors influencing establishment in Texas. BioControl 56: 295–30 Google Scholar

15.

G. O. Poinar Jr ., S. D. Porter , S. Tang , and B. C. Hyman 2007. Allomermis solenopsii n. sp. (Nematoda: Mermithidae) parasitizing the fire ant Solenopsis invicta Buren (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Argentina. Syst. Parasitol. 68: 115–128. Google Scholar

16.

S. D. Porter 1992. Frequency and distribution of polygyne fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Florida. Florida Entomol. 75: 248–257. Google Scholar

17.

S. D. Porter 1998. Biology and behavior of Pseudacteon decapitating flies (Diptera: Phoridae) that parasitize Solenopsis fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Florida Entomol. 81: 292–309. Google Scholar

18.

S. D. Porter 2010. Distribution of the Formosa strain of the fire ant decapitating fly Pseudacteon curvatus (Diptera: Phoridae) three and a half years after releases in North Florida. Florida Entomol. 93: 107– 112. Google Scholar

19.

S. D. Porter , and W. R. Tschinkel 1985a. Fire ant polymorphism: the ergonomics of brood production. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 16: 323–336. Google Scholar

20.

S. D. Porter , and W. R. Tschinkel 1985b. Fire ant polymorphism (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): factors affecting worker size. Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 78: 381–386. Google Scholar

21.

S. D. Porter , and M. A. Pesquero 2001. Illustrated key to Pseudacteon decapitating flies (Diptera: Phoridae) that attack Solenopsis saevissima complex fire ants in South America. Florida Entomol. 84: 691– 699. Google Scholar

22.

S. D. Porter , and L. E. Gilbert 2004. Assessing host specificity and field release potential of fire ant decapitating flies (Phoridae: Pseudacteon), pp. 152–176. In R. G. Van Driesche and R. Reardon [eds.], Assessing host ranges for parasitoids and predators used for classical biological control: a guide to best practice. FHTET-2004-03, USDA Forest Service, Morgantown, West Virginia. Google Scholar

23.

S. D. Porter , and L. A. Calcaterra 2013. Dispersal and competitive impacts of a third fire ant decapitating fly (Pseudacteon obtusus) established in North Central Florida. Biol. Control 64: 66–74. Google Scholar

24.

S. D. Porter , H. G. Fowler , and W. P. Mackay 1992. Fire ant mound densities in the United States and Brazil (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 85: 1154–1161. Google Scholar

25.

S. D. Porter , L. A. Nogueira De Sá , and L. W. Morrison 2004. Establishment and dispersal of the fire ant decapitating fly Pseudacteon tricuspis in North Florida. Biol. Control 29: 179–188. Google Scholar

26.

S. D. Porter , S. M. Valles , and D. H. Oi 2013. Host specificity and colony impacts of the fire ant pathogen, Solenopsis invicta virus 3. J. Invert. Pathol. 114: 1–6. Google Scholar

27.

S. D. Porter , D. F. Williams , R. S. Patterson , and H. G. Fowler 1997. Intercontinental differences in the abundance of Solenopsis fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): escape from natural enemies? Environ. Entomol. 26: 373–384. Google Scholar

28.

S. D. Porter , A. P. Bhatkar , R. Mulder , S. B. Vinson , and D. J. Clair 1991. Distribution and density of polygyne fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Texas. J. Econ. Entomol. 84: 866–874. Google Scholar

29.

S. D. Porter , L. C. Graham , S. J. Johnson , L. G. Thead , and J. A. Briano 2011. The large decapitating fly Pseudacteon litoralis (Diptera: Phoridae): Successfully established on fire ant populations in Alabama. Florida Entomol. 94: 208–213. Google Scholar

30.

R. T. Puckett , A. Calixto , C. L. Barr , and M. Harris 2007. Sticky traps for monitoring Pseudacteon parasitoids of Solenopsis fire fnts. Environ. Entomol. 36: 584–588. Google Scholar

31.

S. M. Valles 2012. Positive-strand RNA viruses infecting the red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta. Psyche 2012: Article ID 821591, 14 pp. Google Scholar

32.

S. M. Valles , and S. D. Porter 2013. Procedures to mitigate the impact of Solenopsis invicta virus 3 in fire ant rearing facilities. Florida Entomol. 96: 252–254. Google Scholar

33.

R. J. Vazquez , S. D. Porter , and J. A. Briano 2006. Field release and establishment of the decapitating fly Pseudacteon curvatus on red imported fire ants in Florida. BioControl 51: 207–216. Google Scholar

34.

J. T. Vogt , S. D. Porter , D. A. Nordlund , and R. Smith 2003. A modified rearing system for production of Pseudacteon curvatus (Diptera: Phoridae), a parasitoid of imported fire ants. Biol. Control 28: 346–353. Google Scholar

Notes

[1] Supplementary material for this article in Florida Entomologist 96(4) (2013) is online at  http://purl.fcla.edu/fcla/entomologist/browse

Sanford D. Porter, Vivek Kumar, Luis A. Calcaterra, Juan A. Briano, and Dakshina R. Seal "Release and Establishment of the Little Decapitating Fly Pseudacteon cultellatus (Diptera: Phoridae) on Imported Fire Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Florida," Florida Entomologist 96(4), 1567-1573, (1 December 2013). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.096.0440
Published: 1 December 2013
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top