Translator Disclaimer
1 June 2014 Toxicity of Insecticides to Frankliniella invasor (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) Under Laboratory Conditions
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Mango cv. ‘Ataulfo’ is perhaps the most popular mango produced in Mexico. The presence of high densities of thrips in mango blossoms, mainly the species Frankliniella invasor Sakimura, has been linked to yield decline. Growers spray synthetic insecticides on a regular basis against thrips to reduce their numbers, but no studies on the effectiveness of these insecticides have been conducted. The present study was undertaken with the objective of assessing the toxicity of 4 insecticides commonly used by growers. Commercial formulations of spinosad, imidacloprid, malathion, and α-cypermethrin were evaluated on adults of F. invasor under laboratory conditions. Six concentrations of each insecticide were assessed: 0.1, 1, 10, 100, 1000, and 10,000 ppm. Snap bean pods were submerged into the different concentrations of insecticides, dried on paper towels, and placed in a plastic container with the thrips adults. A completely randomized design with 10 replicates per treatment was performed. Probit analyses revealed that spinosad and α-cypermethrin were the most toxic insecticides for F. invasor with estimated LC50 values of 0.413 and 0.636 ppm, respectively. No significant differences in toxicity were found between imidacloprid (LC50 = 23.013 ppm) and malathion (LC50 = 34.422 ppm). Mortality in control treatments (distilled water) was never higher than 14%. Our study suggests the use of spinosad and α-cypermethrin as the best control for F. invasor. However, these results should be complemented with field evaluations before being recommended to mango growers.

Mango (Mangifera indica L.) is a highly popu-lar tropical fruit and important agricultural commodity in the global market. Because of its exquisite taste, pleasant fragrance, and nutritional value, it is termed the ‘King of Fruits’ (Tharanathan et al. 2006). There are more than a thousand cultivars (= varieties) of mango (Mukherjee 1953) of which only around 30 are commercially important and dominate mango plantations worldwide (Galán-Saúco 2009). ‘Ataulfo’ is a yellow-fruited cultivar, perhaps the most popular mango from Mexico among consumers. It was discovered serendipitously, growing freely at Tapachula, Chiapas, at the end of the 1950’s (Magallanes-Cedeño 2004; Infante et al. 2011). Due to its wide acceptance in local and international markets, the popularity of this cultivar has increased rapidly over the last few years.

‘Ataulfo’ mango is considered the best agricultural option for farmers along the Pacific Coast; namely, the Soconusco region (Gehrke 2008). At present, there are about 18,000 ha planted with this cultivar (Magallanes-Cedeño 2004). In recent years, a complex of thrips has drawn the attention of growers because they appear in large numbers in mango blossoms. The complex consists of 7 species in the genus Frankliniella, with Frankliniella invasor Sakimura being the dominant species. Over 600 adults plus immature stages of F. invasor were found in a single mango inflorescence (Rocha et al. 2012). Although the pest status of F. invasor has not been established, these large numbers of thrips are associated with a gradual decline of mango yields from 15 to 4 tons per ha (Gehrke 2008).

According to Sakimura (1972), F. invasor is native to the Caribbean-Central American region, and it was first reported feeding on mango in Hawaii. Adults feed and reproduce on mango inflorescences, and insecticides are sprayed on a regular schedule during flowering to reduce thrips numbers (Rocha et al. 2012). However, there are no studies to document the toxicity of various insecticides on this species and the benefits of chemical insecticides are unknown. The objective of these experiments was to determine the toxicity of 4 insecticides (spinosad, α-cypermethrin, imidacloprid and malathion) that are currently recommended and used in mango orchards against the flower thrips F. invasor. We determined and compared the median lethal concentrations (LC50) of these insecticides on the adult stage of F. invasor under laboratory conditions.

Materials and Methods

During Dec 2012, when there were many mango flowers in the field, we collected numerous inflorescences infested with thrips from the mango orchard ‘El Vergel’ (N 14° 42′ 06″ -W 92° 18′ 57″; 25 m asl). The samples were collected early in the morning (usually before 7:00 am), and each inflorescence was placed in a labeled plastic bag. Inflorescences were immediately taken to the laboratory where F. invasor adults were separated in plastic vials using an aspirator. Adult thrips were separated in batches of 10 individuals to be subsequently used in the bioassays. Frankliniella invasor was distinguished from other species by the abdominal shadings (paired lateral spots) that are characteristic of this species (Mound & Marullo 1996).

Commercial insecticides were purchased at agrochemical local stores. In the bioassays we used the following products: spinosad (Spintor® 12 CS; Dow AgroSciences), α-cypermethrin (Arriva® 200 EC; FMC Agroquímica de México), imidacloprid (Confidor® 350 CS; Bayer CropScience), and malathion (Malathion® 1000 EC; Agroquímica Tridente, México). Before running the bioassays, 6 concentrations of each insecticide were prepared using distilled water: 0.1, 1, 10, 100, 1,000, and 10,000 ppm. The toxicity of insecticides on F. invasor adults was evaluated in bioassays according to the following protocol.

Fresh snap bean pods (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) were obtained from the supermarket. In the laboratory they were rinsed with tap water, dried on paper towels, and chopped in pieces of approximately 5 cm long.

Insecticides were prepared according to the established concentrations mentioned above and the solutions were placed in glass containers.

Different concentrations of insecticides were applied to different groups of bean pods by immersion for 5 min, and subsequently, dried on paper towels for about 15 min. The same procedure was applied to the control, except that bean pods were immersed in distilled water only.

A thin layer of liquid paraffin was applied to both ends of the bean pods to seal them.

Bean pods treated with insecticide were individually placed inside 30 mL transparent plastic cups (3 cm diam).

Ten thrips adults of F. invasor were placed inside each plastic cup with the appropriate green bean pod coated with insecticide. There were 10 replicates per concentration plus the control. Cups were left in the laboratory at a constant temperature of 28.3 °C and 60% RH.

Mortality was evaluated at 6 hours. Cups were opened, and thrips were considered dead when they were unable to stand upright or move after being probed for several seconds.

Living and dead thrips were separated and preserved in vials with 70% ethanol. They were mounted on slides using Hoyer's medium, and dried in an oven at 45 °C for 2 weeks. Then, the taxonomic identification of each specimen was corroborated by the taxonomic keys of Mound & Marullo (1996).

The concentration-mortality responses were determined using a regression log-Probit model (Finney 1971). A goodness of fit test using the Hosmer-Lemeshow χ2 statistic was used to corroborate the approximation of the data to the Probit model (at the P < 0.05 level) (Agresti 2002). The median lethal concentration (LC 50) estimated to kill 50% of the tested population and 95% confidence intervals (Cl) were calculated based on methods by Robertson & Priesler (1992). The failure of 95% confidence limits to overlap was used as a criterion to separate LC values between insecticides. When control mortalities reached more than 5%, the insecticide mortality rates were adjusted with control mortalities using the Abbott’s procedure (Abbott 1925). The statistical package R (R Development Core Team 2013) was used for data analysis.

Results

The response of F. invasor adults exposed to imidacloprid and malathion closely approximated the Probit model (last column of Table 1). In contrast, the dosage mortality equation obtained for spinosad and α-cypermethrin, did not conform adequately to this model due to the over-dispersion of data. In models with binary response, i.e., Probit analysis, over-dispersion is a frequent problem that appears when variability in data is higher than expected. For this reason, data were adjusted through the quasi-likelihood approach (Agresti 2002), prior to the calculations of lethal concentrations for the different insecticides.

The dose response curves are presented in Fig. 1. A marked difference in thrips mortality among tested insecticides was observed. The dose response was nearly quadratic for spinosad (R2 = 0.47; P << 0.001) and α-cypermethrin (R2 = 0.83 ; P < 0.001), while a linear response was obtained for imidacloprid (R2 = 0.81; p < 0.001) and malathion (R2 = 0.89; P < 0.001). The LC50 values and confidence limits for adults of F. invasor are presented in Table 1. Significant differences in LC50 values were observed in most comparisons of insecticides. Spinosad and α-cypermethrin were the most toxic insecticides against F. invasor, with LC50 values of 0.413 and 0.635 ppm, respectively. No significant differences in toxicity were found between imidacloprid (LC50 = 23.013 ppm) and malathion (LC50 = 34.422 ppm). Spinosad and α-cypermethrin at a concentration of 10 ppm killed 99% of the thrips adults. At 100 ppm and higher concentrations, it killed 100% of individuals. Imidacloprid and malathion did not kill 100% of individuals at any of the concentrations tested. Mortality in control treatments (distilled water) was never higher than 14%.

Table 1.

Toxicity in ppm of insecticides against adults of Frankliniella invasor under laboratory conditions. Lethal concentrations are in PPM.

t01_626.gif

Discussion

The median lethal concentration of insecticides is the most widely accepted basis for toxicity tests at a particular length of exposure (Nwani et al. 2010). Pesticides play an important role in modern agriculture. Therefore, it is very important to know the LC50 of pesticides before using them in the field (Raj et al. 2013). Considering that F. invasor is the most abundant species of thrips in mango orchards (Rocha et al. 2012), and apparently one of the factors contributing to mango productivity decline in Chiapas (Gehrke 2008), the lack of studies on this particular topic is unfortunate. As far as we know, this is the first study dealing with the toxicity of insecticides on F. invasor in the laboratory, and it could be an important starting point for further evaluations of other insecticides. The knowledge generated in this study of the toxicities of these insecticides to F. invasor will facilitate resistance monitoring for this pest (Eger et al. 1998).

Spinosad was one of the most toxic insecticides to the adults of F. invasor. This toxicity was evident even at the lowest doses used. At 0.1 ppm it caused 38% mortality and approximately 100% mortality at the dose of 10 ppm. Higher doses of spinosad produced 100% mortality in this species. Our results concur with those reported for other species of thrips in the same genus. For instance, in toxicity bioassays of spinosad against several species of flower thrips in Florida, namely, Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergrande), Frankliniella tritici (Fitch) and Frankliniella bispinosa (Morgan), LC50 values of 0.594, 0.31 and 0.72, were reported, respectively (Eger et al. 1998). Similarly, spinosad has been reported as a very effective insecticide for controlling F. occidentalis in horticultural vegetables in Australia (Kay & Herron 2010). A mortality as high as 98–100% was recorded for spinosad in laboratory bioassays when tested on F. occidentalis adults, whereas in field experiments, the population of larvae and adults of this species significantly decreased in comparison to the control (Kay & Herron 2010).

Frankliniella invasor was sensitive to α-cypermethrin. This insecticide was effective in avocado and mango orchards of Florida when sprayed on the flower thrips, Frankliniella kelliae Sakimura and F. bispinosa (Peña et al. 2006). Regarding imidacloprid and malathion, bioassays revealed that they were similar in toxicity. Both insecticides were reported as very effective when applied to different species of thrips. Shibao et al. (2006) reported that imidacloprid was highly effective against Scirtothrips dorsalis (Hood) on grapes. Similarly, it has been successfully used for the control of the avocado thrips, Scirtothrips perseae Nakahara (Byrne et al. 2007). Malathion has been used to control S. dorsalis with good results and extensive persistence (Chandra et al. 2010).

Fig. 1.

Dose-Response Relationships in PPM of Frankliniella invasor Adults Exposed to Four Insecticides under Laboratory Conditions. The Two Dashed Lines Represent the Confidence Limits (95%) of the Slope (Solid Line).

f01_626.jpg

Insecticides, including the ones under evaluation in this study, are sprayed by mango growers on a regular basis due to the presence of large numbers of thrips: i.e., F. invasor, during mango flowering (Rocha et al. 2012). Therefore, it is critical to have candidate insecticides for this insect. The present work could be the foundation for an eventual pest management program of thrips. However, further research is required to estimate the influence of biotic and abiotic factors on the performance of insecticides under field conditions. Therefore, large-scale experiments in mango orchards are needed to support the present findings. Effective and sustainable management of F. invasor will only be achieved in the overall context of integrated pest management, with insecticide resistance management being a key component. Demirozer et al. (2008) recommended rotating the available insecticides in different chemical classes to avoid the development of resistant thrips. They emphasized that this integrated resistance management strategy should only be a component of a comprehensive integrated pest management program, and it is only recommended when multiple applications of insecticides are needed for thrips or other pests during the same cropping season.

Acknowledgments

This research was financially supported by El Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT) of Mexico, through research grant 106766. We thank Antonio Ortiz-Girón for excellent technical support. A draft of this manuscript was kindly reviewed and improved by Dr. Jeanneth Pérez (ECOSUR).

References Cited

1.

W. S. Abbott 1925. A method for computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J. Econ. Entomol. 18: 265–267 Google Scholar

2.

A. Agresti 2002. Categorical data analysis. 2nd edn. Wiley & Sons, New Jersey. Google Scholar

3.

F. J. Byrne , N. C. Toscano , A. A. Urena , and J. G. Morse 2007. Toxicity of systemic neonicotinoid insecticides to avocado thrips in nursery avocado trees. Pest Mgt. Sci. 63: 860–866. Google Scholar

4.

M. Chandra , R. K. Yerma , R. Prakash , M. Kumar , D. Verma , and D. K. Singh 2010. Effect of malathion on adults of Scirtothrips dorsalis and Rhiphiphorothrips cruentatus (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Adv. Biores. 1: 78–80. Google Scholar

5.

O. Demirozer , K. Tyler-Julian J. Funderburk , N. Leppla , and S. Reitz 2012. Frankliiniella occidentalis (Pergande) integrated pest management programs for fruiting vegetables in Florida. Pest Mgt. Sci. 68: 1537–1545. Google Scholar

6.

J. E. Eger Jr , J. Stavisky , and J. E. Funderburk 1998. Comparative toxicity of spinosad to Frankliniella spp (Thysanoptera: Tripidae), with notes on a bioassay technique. Florida Entomol. 81: 547–551. Google Scholar

7.

D. J. Finney 1971. Probit Analysis. 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Google Scholar

8.

V. Galán-Saúco 2009. El Cultivo del Mango. 2nd edn. Mundi Prensa, Madrid. Google Scholar

9.

V. M. R. Gehrke 2008. Reflexiones sobre problemas de biología reproductiva del mango Ataulfo en el Soconusco, Chiapas. Tecnología en Marcha 21: 174– 183. Google Scholar

10.

F. Infante , J. Quilantán , F. Rocha , H. Esquinca , A. Castillo , G. Ibarra-Nuñez , and V. Palacio 2011. Mango Ataulfo: orgullo chiapaneco. Biodiversitas 96: 1–5. Google Scholar

11.

I. R. Kay , and G. A. Herron 2010. Evaluation of existing and new insecticides including spirotetramat and pyridalyl to control Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on peppers in Queensland. Australian J. Entomol. 49: 175–181. Google Scholar

12.

R. Magallanes-Cedeño 2004. Area-wide assessment of the ‘Ataulfo’ mango cultivation in the Soconusco Region of Chiapas, Mexico. Acta Hort. 645: 361–363. Google Scholar

13.

L. A. Mound , and R. Marullo 1996. The thrips of Central and South America: an introduction (Insecta: Thysanoptera). Mem. Entomol. Intl. 6: 1–487. Google Scholar

14.

S. K. Mukherjee 1953. The mango : its botany, cultivation, uses and future improvement, especially as observed in India. Econ. Bot. 7: 130–162. Google Scholar

15.

C. D. Nwani , N. S. Nagpure , R. Kumar , B. Kushwaha , P. Kumar , and W. S. Lakra 2010. Lethal concentration and toxicity stress of carbosulfan, glyphosato and atrazine to freshwater air breathing fish Channa punctatus (Bloch). Intl. Aquat. Res. 2: 105–111. Google Scholar

16.

J. E. Peña , R. E. Duncan , and C. W. Meister 2006. Chemical control of flowering thrips infesting tropical fruits. Proc. Florida State Hort. Soc. 119: 21–24. Google Scholar

17.

R Development Core Team. 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Viena, Austria: R foundation for statistical computing. Retrive from  http://www.R-project.orgGoogle Scholar

18.

J. Raj , M. Chandra , T. D. Dogra , M. Pahuja , and A. Raina 2013. Determination of median lethal dose of combination of endosulfan and Cypermethrin in wistar rat. Toxicol. Intl. 20: 1–5. Google Scholar

19.

J. L. Robertson , and H. K. Preisler 1992. Pesticide Bioassays with Arthropods. CRC, Boca Raton, Florida. Google Scholar

20.

F. H. Rocha , F. Infante , J. Quilantán , A. Goldarazena , AND J. E. Funderburk 2012. ‘Ataulfo’ mango flower contains a diversity of trips (Thysanoptera). Florida Entomol. 95: 171–178. Google Scholar

21.

K. Sakimura 1972. Frankliniella invasor, new species, and notes of F. gardeniae and the Frankliniella spp. in Hawaii (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Proc. Hawaiian Entomol. Soc. 21: 263–270. Google Scholar

22.

M. Shibao , E. Shozo , A. Hosomi , and H. Tanaka 2006. Effect of insecticide application on the population density of yellow tea thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and Euseius sojaensis (Ehara) (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on grapes. Japanese J. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 50: 247–252. Google Scholar

23.

R. N. Tharanathan , H. M. Yashoda , and T. N. Prabha 2006. Mango (Mangifera indica L.) “the king of fruits” - an overview. Food Rev. Intl. 22: 95–123. Google Scholar
Francisco Infante, Jhesser de León, Javier Valle-Mora, and Joe E. Funderburk "Toxicity of Insecticides to Frankliniella invasor (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) Under Laboratory Conditions," Florida Entomologist 97(2), 626-630, (1 June 2014). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.097.0239
Published: 1 June 2014
JOURNAL ARTICLE
5 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top