Translator Disclaimer
1 June 2014 First Record of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Argentina
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Because of the recent presence of Helicoverpa armigera in Brazil and Paraguay in 2013, pheromone traps were deployed in chickpea crops at 2 localities in Tucumán province to determine if this noctuid was present in Argentina. This pest was detected at both locations, confirming the presence of H. armigera in Argentina for first time.

The Old World cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera Hübner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), is one of the most important pests in the world, and is widely distributed, being present in Europe, Asia, Africa, and Oceania (Zalucki et al. 1986; Guo 1997). Recently, this species was found in Brazil (Czepak et al. 2013) and Paraguay (Senave 2013).

Helicoverpa armigera is a polyphagous agricultural pest and was reported in more than 180 cultivated crop species, which include cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.; Malvales: Malvaceae), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor [L.] Moench; Poales: Poaceae), corn (Zea mays L.; Poales: Poaceae), soybean (Glycine max L.; Fabales: Fabaceae), tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.; Solanales: Solanaceae), chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.; Fabales: Fabaceae), sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.; Asterales: Asteraceae), fruit trees, and wild plants belonging to a broad spectrum of families (Asteraceae, Fabaceae, Malvaceae, Poaceae, and Solanaceae). Larvae damage vegetative and reproductive plant stages. They feed on leaves, stems, buds, inflorescences, fruits, and pods, where voracious larval feeding leads to substantial economic loss (Reed 1965; Fitt 1989; Czepak et al. 2013; Tay et al. 2013). According to Lammers & MacLeod (2007), the worldwide annual costs for controlling this pest along with yield losses, reach and estimated US$ 5 billion.

Control tactics applied for this pest in various countries include traps baited with the pest's sex pheromone, resistant cultivars, Bt-transgenic cultivars, destruction of crop remnants, release of natural enemies and use of insecticides (Czepak et al. 2013). This pest has developed resistance to the Cry endotoxins of Bacillus thuringiensis and to synthetic chemical insecticides, as demonstrated in several laboratories in India, China, and Australia (Akhurst et al. 2003; Gao et al. 2009).

The life cycle of this moth (egg to adult) lasts from 4 to 6 weeks. The adults are highly mobile, having been known to disperse up to 2,000 km, and they have the capability to survive even under adverse conditions (Fitt 1989; Czepak et al. 2013; Tay et al. 2013). Additional information about the biology of H. armigera can be found in Pedgley (1985), Kurban et al. (2005), Ávila et al. (2013), and Czepak et al. (2013).

In Argentina, 3 species of the Heliothinae subfamily have been observed causing damage to different crops: Heliothis virescens (Fabricius), Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), and Helicoverpa gelotopoeon (Dyar) (Velasco de Stacul et al. 1969; Cordo et al. 2004). The design of wing pattern is useful to differentiate these species (Velasco de Stacul et al. 1969; Navarro et al. 2009). A complication is that H. armigera is a close relative of H. zea, and both species emit the same pheromone compounds, but in different concentrations (Pogue 2004; Witzgall et al. 2004). Helicoverpa zea males are attracted to the sex pheromone containing a blend of compounds used in traps for the field capture of males H. armigera and vice versa. Specimens collected from pheromone traps are usually in poor condition. Therefore, the genitalia are used to accurately identify adult males collected with pheromones (Pogue 2004; Tay et al. 2013). Molecular identification is another tool to identify members of the Helicoverpa complex (Specht et al. 2013; Tay et al. 2013). Considering the presence of H. armigera in Brazil and Paraguay in 2013, the great mobility of the adults, and the lack information about the occurrence of this pest in Argentina, the main aim of this study was to use pheromone traps to determine if this noctuid pest species was present in Argentina.

Pheromone traps were installed in chickpea crops in 2 localities of Tucumán province, Vicios (Leales county) (S 27° 9′ -W 64° 55′), and La Cocha (La Cocha county) (S 27° 48′ -W 65° 29′). Sampling was conducted weekly from Aug to Oct 2013 and the lures were changed every 20 or 30 days. Unitrap yellow® traps were installed according to ChemTica Internacional S.A. recommendations and pheromones of H. armigera and H. gelotopoeon provided by ChemTica® were used.

Collected Helicoverpa spp. adults were identified by one of the authors (F. Navarro) and voucher specimens were deposited in the entomological collection of the Instituto y Fundación Miguel Lilio (IFML) at Tucumán, Argentina. Each sample was placed in a jar of 10% KOH, heated in a water bath, and left to simmer for 40 mins. The genitalia were dissected from the abdomen, and the aedeagus was removed as described by Lafontaine (2004). The vesica was inflated using 99% isopropyl alcohol following the technique described by Pogue (2004).

When working with frayed specimens, like those collected from pheromone traps, it may be impossible to distinguish H. armigera from H. zea or H. gelotopoeon by external appearance. In such cases, differentiation is straightforward if the genitalia are dissected following the protocol proposed by Pogue (2004). Of the total traps used and considering the quality of the specimens, only 48 adults were identified. Specimens from La Cocha were sorted as follows: 25 adults were identified as H. armigera; also adults of H. zea (3) and H. gelotopoeon (5) were captured. All individuals of H. zea were captured in traps that captured H. armigera. All 15 specimens captured at Vicios, Tucumán province were identified as H. armigera.

These results confirm the presence for the first time of H. armigera in Argentina. Previously, Chiarelli de Gahan & Touron (1954) reported the occurrence of H. armigera in Argentina but clearly this was a misidentification as stated by Hardwick (1965).

The arrival of this moth in Argentina poses a risk to the extensive Bt-based and conventional agriculture, mainly because of this pest's history of rapidly evolving resistance to insecticides (Fitt & Wilson 2000; Martin et al. 2005). It will require effective integrated pest management and insecticide resistance management to cope with H. armigera. Further studies should be conducted to determine the distribution of H. armigera in Argentina and its potential as a pest of soybean, corn, cotton, chickpea, as well as to develop effective control methods, and techniques for monitoring the pest’s resistance to insecticides and available Bt cultivars of these crops.

Endnotes

Dra. M. Gabriela Murúa and Ing. Franco S. Scalora contributed equally to this work. We thank Ing. Claudio Bleckwedell (Consorcios Regionales de Experimentación Agrícola C.R. E.A. Group) for excellent technical support and assistance in the collection of material. We also thank Lic. Eduardo Willink (EEAOC) for constructive comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript. This study was supported by Estación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Colombres (EEAOC) and Consejo de Investigaciones de la Universidad Nacional de Tucumán (Project 26/G431).

References Cited

1.

R. J. Akhurst , W. James , L. J. Bird , and C. Beard 2003. Resistance to the Cry1Ac endotoxin of Bacillus thuringiensis in the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 96: 1290–1299. Google Scholar

2.

C. J. Ávila , L. M. Vivan , and G. Vital Tomquelski 2013. Ocorrência, aspectos biológicos, danos e estratégias de manejo de Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) nos sistemas de produção agrícolas. Circular técnica N° 23, Embrapa, ISSN 1679-0464. 12 pp. Google Scholar

3.

A. Chiarelli De Gahan , and E. A. Touron 1954. Biología y Taxonomía de Heliothis armigera (Hbn.). Rev. Investigaciones Agríc. (Bs. As.) 8(2): 111–148. Google Scholar

4.

C. Czepak , K. Cordeiro Albernaz , L. M. Vivan , H. O. GuiMarães , and T. Carvalhais 2013. Primeiro registro de ocorrência de Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) no Brasil. Pesq. Agropec. Trop., Goiânia 43(1): 110–113. Google Scholar

5.

H. A Cordo , G. Logarzo K. Braun , and O. Di Iorio (Directores). 2004. Catálogo de insectos fitófagos de la Argentina y sus plantas asociadas. Soc. Entomol. Argentina ediciones. 734 pp. Buenos Aires, Argentina. Google Scholar

6.

G. P. Fitt 1989. The ecology of Heliothis species in relation to agroecosystems. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 34(1): 17–52. Google Scholar

7.

G. P. Fitt , and L. J. Wilson 2000. Genetic engineering in IPM: Bt cotton, pp. 108–125 In G. G. Kennedy and T. B. Sutton [eds.], Emerging Technologies in Integrated Pest Management: Concepts, Research and Implementation, APS Press, St Paul, MN, USA. Google Scholar

8.

Y. Gao , K. Wu , F. Gould , and Z. Shen 2009. Cry2Ah tolerance response of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) populations from Cry1Ac cotton planting region. J. Econ. Entomol. 102(3): 1217– 1223. Google Scholar

9.

Y. Y. Guo 1997. Progress in the research on migration regularity of Helicoverpa armigera and relationships between the pest and its host plants. Acta Entomol. Sinica, Beijing 40(1): 1–6. Google Scholar

10.

D. F. Hardwick 1965. The Corn Earworm Complex. Mem. Entomol. Soc. Canada 40: 1–247. Google Scholar

11.

A. Kurban ; A. Yoshida , Y. Izumi , S. Sonoda , and H. Tsumuki 2005. Pupal diapause of Helicoverpa armigera: sensitive stage for photoperiodic induction. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 40(3): 457–460. Google Scholar

12.

J. D. Lafontaine 2004. Noctuoidea: Noctuidae (part), Noctuinae, Classification and distribution of the Agrotini, pp. 17–24 In R. W. Hodges [ed.], The Moths of America North of Mexico 27(1): 1–394. The Wedge Entomological Research Foundation. Washington, D.C. Google Scholar

13.

J. W. Lammers , and A. MacLeod 2007. Report of a pest risk analysis: Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner, 1808). [S.l: s.n.], 2007. Available at:  http://www.fera.defra.gov.uk/plants/plantHealth/pestsDiseases/documents/helicoverpa.pdf. Accessed 29-1-2014. Google Scholar

14.

T. Martin , G. O. Ochou , A. Djihinto , D. Traore , M. Togola , J. M. Vassal , M. Vaissayre , and D. Fournier 2005. Controlling an insecticide-resistant bollworm in West Africa. Agric. Ecosystems Environ. 107(4): 409–411. Google Scholar

15.

F. R. Navarro , E. D. Saini , and P. D. Leiva . 2009. Clave pictórica de polillas de interés agrícola. Pergamino (BA) - Argentina: INTA, EEA Pergamino: 29–34. Google Scholar

16.

D. E. Pedgley 1985. Windborne migration of Heliothis armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to the British Isles. Entomol. Gazette, Wallingford 36(1): 15–20. Google Scholar

17.

M. G. Pogue 2004. A new synonym of Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) and differentiation of adult males of H. zea and H. armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae: Heliothinae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 97(6): 1222–1226. Google Scholar

18.

W. Reed 1965. Heliothis armigera (Hb.) (Noctuidae) in western Tanganyika: II. Ecology and natural and chemical control. Bull. Entomol. Res. 56(1): 127–140. Google Scholar

20.

A. Specht , D. R. Sosa-Gomez , S. Vieira de Paula-Moraes , and S. Akimi Cavaguchi Yano 2013. Identificação morfológica e molecular de Helicouerpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) e ampliação de seu registro de ocorrêneia no Brasil. Pesq. Agropec. Brasilera 48(6): 689–692. Google Scholar

21.

W. T. Tay , M. F. Soria , T. Walsh , D. Thomazoni , and P. Sllvie 2013. A brave New World for an Old World Pest: Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Brazil. PLoS ONE 8(11): e80134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080134. Google Scholar

22.

M. Velasco de Estacul , J. M. Barral , and R. N. Orfila 1969. Taxonomía, especificidad y caracteres biológicos diferenciados del complejo de especies denominadas “oruga del capullo” del algodón, “oruga de la espiga” del maíz, “oruga del brote” del tabaco y “bolillera” del lino. Rev. Investigaciones Agropec., Inta, Bs. As., Rep. Argentina. Serie 5, Patología Vegetal 6(2): 19–68. Google Scholar

23.

P. Wltzgall , T. Lindblom , M. Bengtsson , and M. Tóth 2004. The Pherolist.  http://www.pherolist.slu.se/pherolist.php. Accessed 29-1-2014. Google Scholar

24.

M. P. Zalucki , G. Daglish , S. Firempong , and P. H. Twine 1986. The biology and ecology of Helicouerpa armigera (Hübner) and H. punctigera Wallengren (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Australia: what do we know? Australian J. Zool. Melbourne 34(6): 779–814. Google Scholar
M. Gabriela Murúa, Franco S. Scalora, Fernando R. Navarro, Lucas E. Cazado, Augusto Casmuz, M. Elvira Villagrán, Enrique Lobos, and Gerardo Gastaminza "First Record of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Argentina," Florida Entomologist 97(2), 854-856, (1 June 2014). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.097.0279
Published: 1 June 2014
JOURNAL ARTICLE
3 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top