Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
26 March 2020 The philopotamid genus Wormaldia (Insecta, Trichoptera) embedded in mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber
Wilfried Wichard, Patrick Müller, Bo Wang
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

This paper describes four new species of the genus Wormaldia (Philopotamidae): W. transversa, W. cercilonga, W. cercifurcata, and W. squamosa, all from Burmese amber. They belong to so-called micro-caddisflies, which, together with many other Philopotamidae, Psychomyiidae, and the Hydroptilidae, rarely exceed a wing length of ca. 3.5 mm. These micro-caddisflies obviously dominate the mid-Cretaceous Trichoptera fauna of Burmese amber.

1. Introduction

The family Philopotamidae is distributed worldwide with over 800 extant species (MORSE 2020). The highest number of species (about 300 species) is found in the Oriental region, where the oldest representatives of the philopotamid genus Wormaldia were found in the mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber (with an age of almost 100 Ma): Wormaldia myanmari Wichard & Poinar, 2005, W. cretacea Wichard & Wang, 2016, W. resina Wichard & Wang, 2016. Additional fossil Wormaldia species are known from the Late Cretaceous: W. praecursor Botosaneanu, 1995 from New Jersey amber (65–95 Ma) and W. prae-missa Cockerell, 1916 from Tennessee (ca. 70 Ma).

The Eocene Baltic amber (ca. 40–50 Ma) is very rich in extinct caddisflies and the genus Wormaldia. Ulmer (1912) studied the Trichoptera of Baltic amber in general and described W. aequalis (Hagen, 1856), W. congenera Ulmer, 1912, and W. media Ulmer, 1912. Later, further fossil Wormaldia species were added: W. advenaria Mey, 1988, W. angularia Mey, 1986, and W. contigua Mey, 1986 from Saxonian amber in Bitterfeld and new descriptions were provided by Ivanov & Melnitsky, 2005: Wormaldia pheromonia, W. vlipla, and W. sukatshevae and from the Rovno amber (Ukraine): W. nasticentia and W. pobeda (Melnitsky & Ivanov 2010, 2016).

Recently, additional fossil philopotamid caddisflies have been found in mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber, so that we can here describe four more species of the genus Wormaldia. Fossil ancestors of the philopotamid species-rich genera Chimarra, Gunungiella, Kisaura and Dolophilodes are still missing in Burmese amber.

2. Material and methods

The amber material was collected by local people in several districts of northern Myanmar, but most of the material comes from the amber mine located near Noije Bum Village, Myitkyina District, Kachin State (Kania et al. 2015). The age given by UPb dating of zircons from the volcanoclastic matrix of the amber is early Cenomanian (98.8 ± 0.6 million years) (Shi et al. 2012), but the geological age of Burmese amber should be slightly older than the zircon date.

The fossil specimens are embedded in small amber pieces cut from larger Burmese amber pieces. Many adult insects are nearly completely preserved and often visible in ventral and dorsal view. The male genitalia are flattened and often visible in ventral view only. The hind wings are partly covered by the somewhat distorted forewings. Some parts of insects are missing.

Photographs were taken using a Leica stereomicroscope M 420 Apozoom in combination with a Canon EOS 80D, EOS utility software and the Zerene Stacker software.

The wing venation terminology in general follows: I, II, III, IV, V = apical forks I, II, III, IV, V; DC = discoidal cell, MC = median cell, TC = thyridial cell, inf app = inferior appendage, sup app = superior appendage, harp = harpago (apical segment of an inferior appendage), and coxo = coxopodite (basal segment of an inferior appendage), IX = abdominal segment IX. The new species names refer to genital structures (harpago, cercus = superior appendage).

Institutional abbreviations: ZFMK – Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, Germany; NIGP – Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Nanjing, China.

3. Systematic palaeontology

Order Trichoptera Kirby, 1815
Suborder Annulipalpia Martynov, 1924
Family Philopotamidae Stephens, 1829
Genus Wormaldia Mclachlan, 1865

  • Type species : Hydropsyche occipitalis Pictet, 1834; subsequent designation by Ross (1949).

  • Diagnosis (modified after Ross 1956, Muñoz-Quesada & Holzenthal 2008 and Oláh et al. 2019):

  • Adult: Ocelli present. Maxillary palps 5-segmented; segments 1 and 2 short, segment 2 rounded, with an apical or apicolateral brush of setae; segments 3 and 4 strong and longer, often segment 3 slightly longer than segment 4; segment 5 annulate and as long as segment 3 and 4 together or often significantly longer. Labial palps shorter than maxillary palps, 3-segmented, terminal segment longest and annulate. Mesoscutum never with a pair of warts, sometimes with scattered setae. Tibial spurs 2/4/4. Forewing venation complete; Rl unbranched; five apical forks I–V usually present in most extant species and in the extinct W. myanmari Wichard & Poinar, 2008 in Burmese amber, but fork IV absent in some extant species and most extinct species in Burmese amber; intercostal crossvein usually in mid costal region; discoidal cell present, median and thyridial cells often present. Hind wings shorter than forewings with forks I, II, III and V usually present, but fork I sometimes absent; discoidal cell present, median cell absent.

  • Male genitalia: Sterna VII and VIII with or without processes posteromesally; in the extinct W. myanmari in Burmese amber, sternum VII with a subtriangular posteromesal process. Inferior appendages each 2-segmented, usually long, the apical segment (harpago) unbranched, simple, often covered with apicolateral or apical setal patches. In ventral view the pair of inferior appendages spreads in a U- or V-shape. Superior appendages reach in their length approximately the height of the transition from the basal to the apical segments of inferior appendages or are shorter. Tergite X lobate, usually subtriangular or tongue shaped. Phallobase bearing dark sclerites.

  • In Burmese amber, the four new species of the genus Wormaldia show a high morphological similarity in size, shape, and wing venation (Fig. 1). In the fore- and hind wings, the wing venation is with M 3-branched (apical fork IV is missing), forks I, II, III and V present. Discoidal cell is present. In amber the longitudinal veins and especially the crossveins are not always clearly visible. The length of the forewings varies between 2.8 and 3.2 mm. Sternum VII and VIII without posteromesal processes.

  • Good diagnostic features are offered by the external male genital, although visibility in amber is quite limited. The genitalia are usually not completely visible but only from the ventral side. The overlying wings often obscure lateral and dorsal visibility. In ventral view the inferior and underlying superior appendages provide useful criteria for diagnosis.

  • Fig. 1.

    Fore- and hind wing venations of Wormaldia spp. in Burmese amber, I, II, II, V – apical forks I, II, III, V, DC – discoidal cell, MC – median cell, TC – thyridium cell.

    img-z2-7_39.jpg

    Wormaldia transversa n. sp.
    Fig. 2

  • Etymology: The new species is named after the crosswise harpagoes: transversa.

  • Holotype: Male, ZFMK-TRI000817 kept in the amber collection of the Museum Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, Germany (ex coll. Patrick Müller, BUB 1505). The holotype is well embedded in mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber.

  • Diagnosis : Male genitalia with basal (coxopodite) segments significantly shorter than long apical (harpago) segments; the coxopodite probably cube-shaped, so far as visible, the harpago more than twice as long as coxopodite, narrow at the base, widening distally to a broad spoon, the distal edge rounded and covered with a fringe of short hair. The two basal segments cross in the middle of the genitalia. Superior appendage scale oval, short, partially covered by tergum IX, reaching distal end of the coxopodite.

  • Description: Male, adult with general characters of the genus. Length of each forewing 2.5 mm, hind wing 2.4 mm. Head with right antenna partially damaged, left antenna with ca. 14 flagellomeres, incomplete. In forewings apical forks without fork IV. Sterna VII and VIII without processes posteromesally.

  • Wormaldia cercilonga n. sp.
    Fig. 3

  • Etymology: The new species is named after the long superior appendages: cercilonga.

  • Holotype: Male, NIGP172211, deposited in the Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Well preserved in mid Cretaceous Burmese amber.

  • Diagnosis: Superior appendages needle-shaped in ventral view and narrow, oval, scaly in ventrolateral view, reaching the full length the basal segment of the inferior appendages. Basal segment basally broad and gradually tapering distally, apical segment uniformly narrow, its cap covered with a fine hair brush. Basal and apical segments of the inferior appendages elongate, both segments of about the same length.

  • Description: Male, adult with general characters of the genus. Length of each forewing 3.3 mm, hind wing 3 mm in length. Filiform antennae each with 27 flagellomeres plus a little stronger scapus and a small pedicellus. In forewings apical forks without fork IV. Sterna VII and VIII without processes posteromesally.

  • Wormaldia cercifurcata n. sp.
    Fig. 4

  • Etymology: The new species is named after the apically forked cerci: cercifurcata.

  • Holotype: Male, NIGP172212, deposited in the Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Well preserved in mid Cretaceous Burmese amber.

  • Diagnosis: Male genitalia with long and strong inferior appendages, the basal segment longer than the apical segment. The basal segment slightly convex outwards and forming a narrow, flat, light-coloured shell on its inside. The apical segment kept short, widening towards the apex and closing with a wide edge. The superior appendage dark, slightly curved inwards, with a small membranous (?) fringe along its length, pointed at the end, completed with an additional apicolateral dark tooth.

  • Description: Male, adult with general characters of the genus. Length of each forewing 2.5 mm, hind wing 2.4 mm in length. Filiform antennae each with 25 flagellomeres plus a little stronger scapus and a small pedicellus. In forewings apical forks without fork IV. Sternites VII and VIII without processes posteromesally.

  • Wormaldia squamosa n. sp.
    Fig. 5

  • Etymology: The new species is named after the scaly harpago: squamosa.

  • Holotype: Male, ZFMK-TRI000818 kept in the amber collection of the Museum Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, Germany (ex coll. PATRICK Müller, BUB 2854). The holotype is well embedded in mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber.

  • Paratype: Male, ZFMK-TRI000819 kept in the amber collection of the Museum Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, Germany (ex coll. Patrick Müller, BUB 530). The type is embedded in mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber, incomplete.

  • Diagnosis: Male genitalia with basal and apical segments of the inferior appendages about the same length. Basal segment rombic in ventral view, broader than the apical segment, shaped like a flat scale, long oval. Superior appendages scaly, long, about as long as the scaly apical segments of the inferior appendages, in ventral view acicular and curved, narrow, oval, scaly.

  • Description: Male, adult with general characters of the genus. Length of each forewing 3.5 mm, hind wing 3.2 mm in length. Antennae about half as long as the forewings, each consisting of 23 flagellomeres plus stronger scapus and smaller pedicellus. In forewings apical forks without fork IV. Sterna VII and VIII without processes posteromesally.

  • 4. Key to the seven known extinct species of Wormaldia embedded in mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber

    1 Sternum VII with a subtriangular posteromesal process, in forewings M vein 4-branched (apical forks III and IV present), in hind wings fork I absent W. myanmari

    Sternum VII without a subtriangular posteromesal process, in forewings M vein 3-branched (apical forks III present and IV absent), in hind wings fork I present 2

    2 Basal (coxopodite) segment shorter than apical (harpago) segment 3

    – Basal segment significantly longer than apical segment 4

    – Basal and apical segments of the inferior appendages about the same length 5

    3 Superior appendages elongate, pointed, about as long as the inferior appendages W. resina

    – Superior appendage short, about as long asthe coxopodite W. transversa n. sp.

    4 Superior appendages elongate, scaly, simple W. cercilonga n. sp.

    – Superior appendages elongate, dark, at apex forked W. cercifurcata n. sp.

    5 Apical segment of each inferior appendage scaly, long oval W. squamosa n. sp.

    – Apical segment slender, elongate, slightly curved, apex slightly widened W. cretacea

    Fig. 2.

    Wormaldia transversa n. sp. A – Male holotype (ZFMK-TRI000817) in lateral view. B – Male genitalia in lateral view. C – Drawing of male genitalia.

    img-z4-1_39.jpg

    Fig. 3.

    Wormaldia cercilonga n. sp. A – Male holotype (NIGP172211) in dorsal view. B – Male genitalia in dorsolateral view. C – Drawing of male genitalia.

    img-z5-1_39.jpg

    Fig. 4.

    Wormaldia cercifurcata n. sp. A – Male holotype (NIGP172212) in dorsal view. B – Male genitalia in ventrolateral view. C – Drawing of male genitalia.

    img-z6-1_39.jpg

    Fig. 5.

    Wormaldia squamosa n. sp. A – Male holotype (ZFMK-TRI000817) in dorsal view. B – Male genitalia in dorsolateral view. C – Drawing of male genitalia.

    img-z7-1_39.jpg

    5. Conclusions

    Considering the caddisflies of Burmese amber in general, a small size of the adults is often noticeable. Up to now, among the recent caddisflies, the Hydroptilidae, have often been called “micro-caddisflies” (e.g., Marshall 1979; Wells 1993; Wells & Malicky 1997), because their forewings are usually only 2.5–3.5 mm long. In Burmese amber the Psychomyiidae are certainly among the smallest caddisflies, at least in the genus Palerasnitsynus, whose adult wings are only 1.8–2.6 mm long (Wichard et al. 2011, 2018). Philoptamidae of genus Wormaldia described so far also have forewing lengths of about 2.5–3.5 mm and may also be considered “micro-caddisflies,” whereas, e.g., in Europe the extant adults of Wormaldia have forewing lengths of 4–7 mm (Oláh et al. 2019). The tiny specimens of the Palerasnitsynus obviously tend to swarm, because in some amber up to 100 embedded specimens have been counted. Compared with Palerasnitsynus the Wormaldia specimens occur sporadically in amber and do not seem to swarm.

    Questions about the biology of the micro-caddisflies in the Cretaceous Burmese amber are becoming increasingly important. But the time distance of about 100 Ma can hinder the interpretation based on the “principle of actualism”.

    Acknowledgements

    This research was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB26000000), the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research (2019QZKK0706), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (41688103). We are grateful to Wolfram Mey, John C. Morse and Vladimir D. Ivanov for their valuable comments.

    6. References

    1.

    Botosaneanu, L. (1995): Caddis flies (Trichoptera) from Turonian (Upper Cretaceous) amber of New Jersey. – American Museum Novitates, 3140: 1–7. Google Scholar

    2.

    Cockerell, T. D. A. (1917): Insects in Burmese Amber. – Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 10: 323–329. Google Scholar

    3.

    Ivanov, V. D. & Melnitsky, S. I. (2005): New caddisfly species of the genus Wormaldia (Trichoptera: Philopotamidae) from Baltic Amber. – Paleontological Journal, 39: 284–288. Google Scholar

    4.

    Kania, I., Wang, B. & Szwedo, J. (2015): Dicranoptycha Osten Sacken, 1860 (Diptera, Limoniidae) from the earliest Upper Cretaceous Burmese amber. – Cretaceous Research, 52: 522–530. Google Scholar

    5.

    Kirby, W. (1815): Strepsiptera, a new order of insects proposed, and the characters of the order, with those of its genera. – Transactions of the Linnean Society of London, Zoology, 11: 86–122. Google Scholar

    6.

    Marshall, J. E. (1979): A review of the genera of the Hydroptilidae (Trichoptera). – Bulletins of the British Museum (Natural History), Entomology Series, 39 (3): 135–239. Google Scholar

    7.

    Martynov, A. V. (1924): Rucheiniki (caddisflies). – Prakticheskaya Entomologiya, 5: 1–384 (in Russian). Google Scholar

    8.

    Mclachlan, R. (1865): Trichoptera Britannica. A monograph of British species of caddisflies. – Transactions of the Entomological Society of London, 5: 1–184. Google Scholar

    9.

    Melnitsky, S. I. & Ivanov, V. D. (2010): New species of caddisflies (Insecta: Trichoptera) from the Rovno Amber, Eocene of Ukraine. – Palaeontological Journal, 44: 303–311. Google Scholar

    10.

    Melnitsky, S. I. & Ivanov, V. D. (2016): New species of caddisflies (Insecta: Trichoptera) from the Paleogene resins of Europe. – Palaeontological Journal, 50: 69–72. Google Scholar

    11.

    Mey, W. (1986): Die Köcherfliegen des Sächsischen Bernsteins (II) (Trichoptera). – Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift, Neue Folge, 33: 241–248. Google Scholar

    12.

    Mey, W. (1988): Die Köcherfliegen des Sächsischen Bernsteins (III) (Trichoptera). – Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift, Neue Folge, 35: 299–309. Google Scholar

    13.

    Morse, J. C. (2020): Trichoptera World Checklist.  http://entweb.clemson.edu/database/trichopt/index.htm [Accessed 7 January 2020] Google Scholar

    14.

    Muñoz-Quesada F. J. & Holzenthal R. W. (2008): Revision of the Nearctic species of the caddisfly genus Wormaldia McLachlan (Trichoptera: Philopotamidae). – Zootaxa, 1838: 1–75. Google Scholar

    15.

    Oláh, J., Andersen, T., Beshkov, S., Coppa, G., Ruiz Garcia, A. & Johanson, K. A. (2019): Revision of European Wormaldia species (Trichoptera, Philopotamidae): Chimeric taxa of integrative organisation. – Opuscula Zoologica, 50 (1): 31–85. Google Scholar

    16.

    Pictet, F.-J. (1834): Recherches pour servir à l'histoire et à l'anatomie des Phryganides. 235 pp.; Geneva, Switzerland. Google Scholar

    17.

    Ross, H. H. (1956): Evolution and Classification of the Mountain Caddisflies. 213 pp.; Urbana (University of Illinois Press). Google Scholar

    18.

    Ross, H. H. (1949): A classification for the Nearctic species of Wormaldia and Dolophilodes. – Proceedings of the Entmological Society of Washington, 51: 154–160. Google Scholar

    19.

    Shi, G., Grimaldi, D. A., Harlow, G. E., Wang, J., Yang, M., Lei, W., Li, Q. & Li, X. (2012): Age constraint on Burmese amber based on U-Pb dating of zircons. – Cretaceous Research, 37: 155–163. Google Scholar

    20.

    Stephens, J. F. (1829): A Systematic Catalogue of British Insects. Part 1: Insecta Mandipulata. 416 pp.; London (Baldwin & Cradock). Google Scholar

    21.

    Ulmer, G. (1912): Die Trichopteren des Baltischen Bernsteins. – Beiträge zur Naturkunde Preussens, 10: 1–380. Google Scholar

    22.

    Wells, A. (1993): Micro-caddisflies (Trichoptera, Hydroptilidae) from Bali, Indonesia. – Zoologische Mededelingen, 67: 351–359. Google Scholar

    23.

    Wells, A. & Malicky, H. (1997): The micro-caddisflies of Sumatra and Java (Trichoptera: Hydroptilidae). – Linzer Biologische Beiträge, 29: 173–202. Google Scholar

    24.

    Wichard, W. & Poinar, G. O. (2005): Köcherfliegen aus dem Burma Bernstein der oberen Kreide von Myanmar (Insecta, Trichoptera). – Mitteilungen aus dem Geologisch- Paläontologischen Institut der Universität Hamburg, 89: 129–136. Google Scholar

    25.

    Wichard, W. & Wang, B. (2016): New Cretaceous caddisflies from Burmese amber (Insecta, Trichoptera). – Cretaceous Research, 61: 129–135. Google Scholar

    26.

    Wichard, W., Müller, P. & Wang, B. (2018): The psychomyiid genus Palerasnitsynus (Insecta, Trichoptera) in mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber. – Palaeodiversity, 11: 151–166. Google Scholar

    27.

    Wichard, W., Ross, E. & Ross, A. (2011): Palerasnitsynus gen.n. (Trichoptera, Psychomyiidae) from Burmese amber. – ZooKeys, 130: 323–330. Google Scholar
    Wilfried Wichard, Patrick Müller, and Bo Wang "The philopotamid genus Wormaldia (Insecta, Trichoptera) embedded in mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber," Palaeodiversity 13(1), 39-47, (26 March 2020). https://doi.org/10.18476/pale.v13.a4
    Received: 22 January 2020; Accepted: 21 February 2020; Published: 26 March 2020
    KEYWORDS
    amber
    fossil caddisflies
    male genitalia
    micro-caddisflies
    Orientalis
    wing venation
    Back to Top