Translator Disclaimer
1 October 2008 A new species of shearwater of the genus Calonectris (Aves: Procellariidae) from a middle Pleistocene deposit on Bermuda
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Remains of at least 26 individuals of a Calonectris shearwater were recovered from a Pleistocene beach deposit on Bermuda that formed when sea-level was more than 21 m above present level during an interglacial (Marine Isotope Stage 11) 400,000 yr ago. Two prefledging juveniles in the sample indicate breeding on the island. This shearwater was the general size of C. d. diomedea of the Mediterranean but differs in proportions and in qualitative characters and is described as Calonectris wingatei, new species. The species appears to have become extinct shortly after the time of deposition, when rising sea-level is also thought to have caused the extinction of the Short-tailed Albatross Phoebastria albatrus on Bermuda. The Neogene history of the taxa of Calonectris in the Atlantic basin is examined in the context of major geological and oceanographic events.

Bermuda's isolated position in the North Atlantic, 1000 km east of the North American mainland, places it within foraging distance for procellariiform birds of both temperate and subtropical waters as well as hydrographic fronts that form along the nearby Gulf Stream (Haney & McGillivary 1985). Despite this, the diversity of breeding Procellariiformes known from the island is quite low. The highly endangered Cahow Pterodroma cahow, once the most abundant bird on Bermuda, is the only member of the order that persists on the island. A small extinct shearwater, which provisionally takes the name Puffinus parvus Shufeldt (see Olson 2004a), is known only from fossils, and appears to have been succeeded, probably in historic times, by the West Indian Audubon's Shearwater P. lherminieri, which in turn was extirpated on Bermuda in the 20th century (Amos 1991). There are three known nesting attempts by Manx Shearwater Puffinus puffinus, but this species was apparently never an established resident, as the abundant fossil record from the island (Olson et al. 2005) has so far yielded only a single sternum of the species (Olson 2004a). Finally, the Short-tailed Albatross Phoebastria albatrus once bred on Bermuda, but the Atlantic population appears to have been extirpated by the maximum rise of sea level (>+21 m) in the Pleistocene 400,000 yr ago during Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) 11 (Olson & Hearty 2003). The former presence of a fifth species of procellariiform on Bermuda is here documented from a large assortment of fossil bones of a shearwater of the genus Calonectris from a single deposit that formed at the height of the same sea level rise that is postulated to have wiped out the albatross.

Three living taxa of shearwaters of the genus Calonectris currently breed on islands in the North Atlantic and Mediterranean, all of which had at one time been considered subspecies of a single species. Of these, it is now generally agreed that the Cape Verde Shearwater C. edwardsi is a distinct species by virtue of much smaller size and plumage differences (Hazevoet 1995:67), as well as by molecular differences (Gómes-Díaz et al. 2006). The Mediterranean or Scopoli's Shearwater C. diomedea breeds on islands in the Mediterranean Sea. The larger Cory's Shearwater C. borealis breeds in the North Atlantic islands of the Azores, Canaries, Salvages, Madeira, and the Berlengas Islands off of Portugal. There has been much variation in opinion as to whether this taxon deserves full specific rank or should be regarded as a subspecies of C. diomedea (discussed beyond).

I originally interpreted the Pleistocene accumulation from Bermuda as having been derived from beached wintering individuals of C. d. diomedea (Olson & Rasmussen 2001, Olson et al. 2005). With further study, I have found that these fossils belong to a previously unrecognized species, similar in size to C. d. diomedea but with larger hindlimbs and more robust long bones. This species was breeding on Bermuda up until the middle Pleistocene, after which it appears to have become extinct.

Materials and Methods

Modern comparative skeletal material was examined in the collections of the Division of Birds, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. (USNM). At the generic level, comparisons were made with Fulmarus glacialis 561911, Pterodroma leucoptera 615080, Procellaria aequinoctialis 490787, Calonectris d. diomedea 620711, Puffinus (Hemipuffinus) creatopus 559553, P. (Thyellodroma) pacificus 500712, P. (Ardenna) gravis 561135, P. (Puffinus) griseus 599153, P. (P.) puffinus 491958. At the specific level, comparisons were made with: Calonectris d. borealis—Massachusetts 17767, 17770, 17773–76, 17788–91, 17831, New Jersey 347825; C. d. diomedea—Greece 488776–77, 555936 (several individuals), Italy 612133, North Carolina 620710–18; C. edwardsi (trunk skeletons only)—Razo I., Cape Verdes 560762–68; and C. leucomelas—Halmahera, Indonesia 558350. Fossil material is housed in the Department of Paleobiology, Smithsonian Institution. Measurements were taken with digital calipers to the nearest 0.1 mm.

Family Procellariidae

Genus Calonectris Mathews & Iredale, 1915

The species of Calonectris were usually placed in the genus Puffinus, even after their separation had been proposed (e.g., Peters 1931). It was only following the innovative study of Kuroda (1954) that the validity of Calonectris came to be accepted. The long, slender rostrum allies the Bermuda species with the Puffininae as opposed to the fulmarines. As noted by Kuroda, only in Calonectris are the anterior intervertebral foramina of the sacrum closed by ossification. In Calonectris the shaft of the humerus is terete, not flattened as in subgenus Puffinus and to a lesser extent in Ardenna, but is relatively longer and more slender than in any of the taxa, except Thyellodroma. The brachial depression is more restricted than in Fulmarus, Pterodroma, or Procellaria, but is not as small and decidedly rounded in shape as in Thyellodroma. In Calonectris the shaft of the femur in medial view is slightly curved (straight in Fulmarus, Pterodroma, Procellaria), but decidedly less curved than in any of the species of Puffinus, except the subgenus Hemipuffinus, from which Calonectris differs in having the shaft relatively more slender, with the appearance of being slightly constricted near the midpoint. The inner cnemial crest of the tibiotarsus is much less developed in Calonectris than in Puffinus. In all Puffinus, except subgenus Hemipuffinus, the shaft of the tarsometarsus is more laterally compressed and the inner trochlea more retracted than in Calonectris, in which the tarsometarsus is much more gracile than in Hemipuffinus. In all of these respects the Bermuda material is clearly referable to Calonectris.

Calonectris wingatei, new species

Figs. 1Figure 2Figure 34

Figure 1

Cranial elements of Calonectris. A, skull of C. wingatei holotype (USNM 535555); B, mandible of C. wingatei (USNM 535566); C, D, skull and mandible of C. d. diomedea (USNM 620716). Mandibles appear as mirror images. Arrows indicate the larger fonticulus orbitocranialis of the cranium and in the mandible the depression for the M. adductor mandibulae.

i0006-324x-121-3-398-f01.gif

Figure 2

Wing elements of Calonectris. A, B, E, G, C. d. diomedea. C, D, F, H, C. wingatei. A–D, right humeri (USNM 620714, 620710, 535601, 535600). E, F, right ulnae (USNM 620714, 535604); G, H, left carpometacarpi (USNM 620716, 535605). Note the stouter shafts in C. wingatei.

i0006-324x-121-3-398-f02.gif

Figure 3

Hindlimb elements of Calonectris. A, C, E, C. wingatei. B, D, F. C. d. diomedea. A, left tarsometatarsi (left to right, USNM 535647, 535648, 535646, 535645); B, C. d. diomedea (left to right, USNM 620714, 620711, 620716, 620710); C, D, right tibiotarsi (USNM 535617, 620710); E, F, right femora (USNM 535621, 620710). Note the much stouter shafts in C. wingatei.

i0006-324x-121-3-398-f03.gif

Figure 4

Bones of prefledging juveniles of Calonectris wingatei. A–B, humerus and ulna(?) of an older individual (USNM 535682) than C–G (USNM 535681), which are probably from a single individual; C, ulna; D, right humerus; E, right and left femora; F, right and left tibiotarsi with unfused tarsals; G, right and left tarsometatarsi lacking proximal tarsals.

i0006-324x-121-3-398-f04.gif

Holotype

USNM 535555 articulated cranium and rostrum lacking the quadratojugals and all elements of the palate; collected 9 Aug 1984 by S. L. Olson, D. B. Wingate, and Frederick V. Grady.

Type Locality

Bermuda, Hamilton Parish, Calonectris Quarry, 32°20′20.9″N, 64°42′24.5W″ (see Olson et al. 2005). The site where the fossils were collected, called Calonectris Quarry, was exposed in the Government Quarry on the western side of Castle Harbour on the eastern end of Bermuda. It was described briefly by Olson & Hearty (2003) and Olson et al. (2005) and in detail by Olson & Hearty (2009) because of its importance in providing multiple lines of evidence for sea-level having exceeding 20 m above present in the Middle Pleistocene. The associated fauna (Olson & Hearty 2009) consisted of terrestrial and marine invertebrates, fish, three species of seabirds in addition to Calonectris (Pterodroma cahow, Puffinus parvus, Phoebastria albatrus), three species of land birds, a skink (Olson et al. 2006), and a vagrant bat (Grady & Olson 2006).

The accumulation clearly formed as a beach deposit, the birds having been washed into a crevice that was probably near the maximum of normal wave runup on a sloping beach. The elevation of the site was determined by transit survey as being exactly 70 ft (21.3 m) above present sea level.

Age

Middle Pleistocene, Marine Isotope Stage 11, 400,000 yr BP (Olson & Hearty 2003, 2009). A +21 m sea stand in MIS 11 has also been documented at two localities in the Bahamas (Hearty et al. 1999) and was later confirmed at another site on Oahu, Hawaiian Islands (Hearty 2002) and elsewhere. This event would have had a major impact on seabirds worldwide.

Measurements of Holotype (mm)

Total length 101.8, length of rostrum from nasofrontal hinge 55.5, length of cranium from nasofrontal hinge 47.5, width of nasofrontal hinge 13.4, least width of interorbital bridge 10.4, greatest width of cranium (at postorbital processes) 35.9, depth of rostrum at nasofrontal hinge 11.4.

Paratypes

535627 rostrum and dorsal surface of cranium; USNM 535552–54, 535556 crania; 535557, 525628–30 rostra; 535558 anterior half of rostrum; 535559–65 rostral hooks; 535565–78 incomplete mandibulae; 535579 left lacrimal; 535580–84, 535632–34, 535653 right coracoids; 535585–90, 535654–56 left coracoids; 535659 right clavicle; 535649 sternum lacking much of right side; 535591, 535631, 535650 anterior portions of sterna; 535651–52 synsacra; 535592–93, 535657–58 right scapulae; 535594–97 left scapulae; 535598–601, 535635–36, 535663–67 right humeri; 535602–03, 535637–38, 535660–62, left humeri; 535604, 535639–40, 535668–71 right ulnae; 535641, 535672–74 left ulnae; 535675–79 right radii; 535605–07, 535680 left carpometacarpi; 535608–09 right carpometacarpi; 535610–12, 535642 right phalanx 1 of major alar digit; 535613–15, 535643 left phalanx 1 of major alar digit; 535616 right tibiotarsus lacking inner cnemial crest; 535617 left tibiotarsus lacking inner cnemial crest; 535618 distal half of left tibiotarsus; 535619 distal two-thirds of right tibiotarsus; 535620 proximal third of right tibiotarsus; 535621 left femur; 535622 right femur; 535623 left femur lacking distal end; 535644 right tarsometatarsus; 535624, 535645–48 left tarsometatarsi; 535625 proximal end of right tarsometatarsus; 535626 distal end of left tarsometatarsus. 535681 postcranial elements of a very young, prefledging juvenile; 535682 proximal end of left humerus and proximal ulna(?) of a somewhat older juvenile. There are many more specimens, mainly fragmentary, in the collections but that were not used for comparisons or measurements and have not been cataloged. The minimum number of individuals is 26, including the two juveniles.

Measurements of Paratypes

See Table 1.

Table 1

Skeletal measurements (lengths in mm) of Calonectris. From left to right and top to bottom the figures represent range, mean, n, and standard deviation.

i0006-324x-121-3-398-t01.gif

Etymology

Dedicated to David B. Wingate, premier naturalist and conservationist of Bermuda, savior of the Cahow, and paleontological explorer and facilitator.

Diagnosis

A species of Calonectris smaller than C. diomedea borealis (Table 1), larger than C. edwardsi or C leucomelas, which latter is quite distinct from any of the Atlantic taxa. Similar in size to C. d. diomedea (Table 1) but with femur absolutely larger and all long bones more robust (Table 2). In the cranium, the fonticulus orbitocranialis is larger and more irregularly ossified anteriorly than in C. d. diomedea (Fig. 1). The mandibular ramus is generally deeper, with the symphysis longer, wider, and deeper than in C. d. diomedea. The external fossa on the dentary for the attachment of part of M. adductor mandibulae is markedly deeper and more extensive in the fossils than in C. d. diomedea (Fig. 1).

Table 2

Shaft widths (mm) at midpoint of limb bones of Calonectris. From left to right the figures represent range, mean, and n.

i0006-324x-121-3-398-t02.gif

Description

The large series of shearwater bones from Calonectris Quarry are from a species much larger and more robust than C. edwardsi, as seen in visual comparison of the coracoids and femora in 7 trunk skeletons of that species. The length measurements of the femora of C. edwardsi (35.4–37.9 mm, mean 36.4) are far below those of the two intact femora of C. wingatei (43.2 and 45.4 mm). The Pacific species C. leucomelas is a much more gracile bird with a longer, more slender bill than in the Bermudan fossils.

It has been well established that C. d. borealis is larger than C. d. diomedea based on measurements, body weight, and egg weight (Jouanin 1976, Massa & Lo Valvo 1986, Granadeiro 1993). Within each taxon there is geographic size variation and males are larger than females (Wink & Ristow 1979, Witt et al. 1984, Massa & Lo Valvo 1986, Granadeiro 1993). In the series of skeletons of C. d. diomedea and C. d. borealis measured here (Table 1), there is slight overlap between the taxa in all measurements, with the larger extremes of C. d. diomedea falling within the range of smaller individuals of C. d. borealis. Calonectris wingatei is clearly smaller than C. d. borealis (with the exception of cranium length, which scarcely differs among the three samples).

Although C. wingatei is in the general size range of C. d. diomedea, it was a decidedly more robust bird (Figs. 2, 3), particularly in the hindlimb. There is no overlap at all in tarsal width between the two (Table 2), and only one measurement each for femur and tibiotarsus of D. wingatei was less than the maximum for C. d. diomedea. The two exceptions could very well have come from immature birds. There was no overlap in the width of the shaft of the ulna (Table 2), and only two carpometacarpi of C. wingatei were less than the maximum for C. d. diomedea. Although there is overlap in the shaft widths of the humerus, all measurements of C. wingatei exceed the mean for C. d. diomedea and nearly 40% are at (1) or exceed (5) the maximum in that taxon. In length, the leg elements are absolutely larger (femur) or average larger in C. wingatei, whereas the rostrum and wing elements all average smaller than in C. d. diomedea, so that C. wingatei appears to have been a heavy-set bird with relatively smaller wings than C. d. diomedea. This suggests the possibility that the Bermuda bird may have been more sedentary and may not have performed long migrations.

Taphonomy and Extinction of Calonectris on Bermuda

A minimum of 24 adult individuals is indicated. Disproportionate representation of wing and pectoral girdle elements compared with hindlimb and cranial bones suggests that most of the birds died at sea and were in various stages of decomposition when washed ashore (Olson & Hearty 2009). Two individuals are early juvenile birds that would have been too young to fly and that must have hatched on the island. The bones are still very porous and unformed, and the tarsals are unfused to the metatarsals or the tibiae (Fig. 4). That at least two individuals are represented is indicated by humeri and ulnae of different sizes and stages of development.

Ordinarily, one would expect to see indication of higher mortality among juveniles than adults. The disproportion of adults to juveniles in the sample might be explained by the fact that in at least some populations of Calonectris, approximately 75% of individuals occupying a breeding colony may be non-breeders (Araujo et al. 1976).

A more likely possibility is that by the time sea level reached 21 m above present levels there would have been very little land area or suitable nesting sites for Calonectris left on Bermuda and normal population dynamics would have been disrupted. In a long-lived seabird such as a species of Calonectris, a large adult population might persist for years after recruitment had fallen below levels sufficient to sustain the species. Not long after the Calonectris Quarry bones were deposited, sand generated and exposed by the falling MIS 11 sea was blown over the site, completely burying the former seacliff above the deposit and probably obliterating most or all suitable nesting crevices for Calonectris.

Two juvenile albatrosses in the same deposit with the bones of Calonectris represent the last known occurrence of resident albatrosses in the North Atlantic (Olson & Hearty 2003). The only older locality in Bermuda from which vertebrate fossils have been recovered is the storm deposit at Green Island and vicinity on the south shore that was the site of an albatross colony near present sea level that formed at the beginning of the same interglacial stage as the Calonectris Quarry site (Olson & Hearty 2003). This was a sandy beach ridge that would have been unsuitable as a breeding site for Calonectris shearwaters and the only bird remains found here were those of albatrosses, with the exception of a single fragment of rostrum of a Great Auk Pinguinus impennis (Olson 2004b).

Prior to the catastrophic MIS 11 inundation was a very long stable period of some half million yr during which sea levels, while fluctuating, were always below their present level, exposing the entire Bermuda platform (Olson et al. 2005, 2006). Calonectris probably throve on Bermuda at that time, but no vertebrate fossil deposits of that age have ever been found on the island (Olson et al. 2005). On the other hand, many deposits younger than Calonectris Quarry, containing tens of thousands of bird bones representing most of the past 200,000 yr of Bermuda's history have been found (Hearty et al. 2004, Olson et al. 2005), none of which are referable to Calonectris. Thus, the Bermuda species of Calonectris probably became extinct shortly after the only known aggregation of its bones was deposited in the middle Pleistocene.

Paleogeographical History of Calonectris in the Atlantic

The earliest fossil record for Calonectris is a small species in middle Miocene deposits of the Calvert Formation of Maryland and Virginia, about 14 million yr in age (Olson unpublished). It is uncertain what the relationships of that species may have been to the larger members of the genus. Nearly 10 million yr elapsed before the next occurrence of the genus in the early Pliocene. Two fragmentary fossils from South Africa were referred to a Calonectris that would probably have been nearest to C. d. borealis in size (Olson 1985). Three species were recorded from the early Pliocene Yorktown Formation in North Carolina, between 4 and 5 million yr of age (Olson & Rasmussen 2001). One of these was a giant species, C. krantzi, that was roughly the size of some of the species of Procellaria. The other two were identified on size as probable temporal representatives of C. borealis and C. diomedea. On re-examination of the material this assessment will require some modification. The specimen referred to C. d. borealis appears to be correctly assigned. The femur referred to C. d. diomedea, however, is quite small, and is possibly better referred to C. edwardsi. Because C. d. diomedea had presumably not differentiated as early as the early Pliocene (see below), the three humeri referred to that taxon by Olson & Rasmussen (2001) could well have come from individuals of C. wingatei or its direct antecedent.

An important paleoenvironmental factor influencing the evolution of procellariiform birds in the Atlantic was the so-called Messinian Salinity Crisis at the end of the Miocene, which lasted about 400,000 yr and ended some 5.3 million yr ago (Gautier et al. 1994, Suc & Clauzon 1996). At this time the Mediterranean Sea was cut off from the Atlantic and was either nearly dry or consisted of highly saline lakes (Stanley 1990). In either case, there would have been no suitable habit for procellariiform birds in the Mediterranean basin at this time, as noted by Voous (1976), and probably for a considerable period thereafter, until the basin refilled and oceanographic conditions stabilized sufficiently for the establishment of marine ecosystems with all the elements lower on the food web than surface-feeding predatory birds. Thus, given that C. borealis was the likely progenitor of C. diomedea, the latter is not likely to have differentiated until well into the Pliocene at the earliest. Molecular evidence appears to support this as well (see below).

Until recently, C. borealis was usually considered to be a subspecies of C. diomedea but a case for specific status for these shearwaters was summarized by Sangster et al. (1999), who, under Calonectris borealis, stated that “Cory's Shearwater and Scopoli's Shearwater C. diomedea are specifically distinct based on phylogeographic analysis of allozymes (Randi et al. 1989) and mitochondrial DNA (Heidrich et al. 1996, 1998), qualitative differences in vocalisations (Bretagnolle & Lequette 1990) and analysis of morphological characters (Granadeiro 1993, Gutiérrez 1998).” This statement does not accurately reflect the results reported in the papers cited, however, which were either equivocal, did not address the issue, or came to exactly the opposite conclusion.

Individuals of C. d. borealis occur in the Mediterranean in colonies of C. d. diomedea, either as non-breeders (Lo Valvo & Massa 1988), paired with another individual of C. d. borealis (Sánchez Codoñer & Albufera 1994), or possibly forming mixed pairs with C. d. diomedea (Thibault & Bretagnolle 1998). Rabouam et al. (2000) concluded from their genetic studies that the two taxa were subspecies that had only recently differentiated. Penhallurick & Wink (2004:139) considered that within Calonectris “the Mediterranean and the Atlantic lineages differ morphologically and genetically, but distances are rather small, suggesting that C. d. diomedea and C. d. borealis should be treated as subspecies.” In a phylogeographic genetic evaluation of the Calonectris species complex, Gómez-Díaz et al. (2006) found a low but consistent level of genetic difference between C. d. diomedea and C. d. borealis, also suggesting a relatively recent divergence time for these taxa, which they treated as subspecies. In addition, they found that a population breeding at Almeria on the Mediterranean coast of Spain was clearly assignable to C. d. borealis, suggesting that the Almeria-Oran oceanographic front was a more important barrier to these taxa than the Straits of Gibraltar. Although the subspecies concept is in many cases inappropriately applied in Procellariiformes, this is one instance when it use appears justified.

Calonectris d. borealis breeds on islands that are in areas of cold-water upwelling such as the Azores Current and the Canary Current, whereas C. d. diomedea is an occupant of the warmer waters of the Mediterranean with a main wintering area now apparently in the vicinity of the Gulf Stream in the western Atlantic. Although both taxa occur in the western North Atlantic off North Carolina (Lee 1995), C. d. diomedea may predominate at times, as shown by a series of nine Calonectris collected off North Carolina on 15 Sep 1995, all of which proved to be C. d. diomedea (USNM 620710–620718). On the other hand, most of the individuals occurring in cold South African waters are C. d. borealis (Camphuysen & van der Meer 2001) rather than C. d. diomedea as had been thought previously (Mougin et al. 1988). Thus the size differences in these taxa could simply be a reflection of environmental responses, with the larger form in colder regions in accordance with Bergman's Rule.

If body size is affected by sea-surface temperatures, one would expect any Calonectris occupying the warmer waters around Bermuda to be smaller than C. d. borealis, as was C. wingatei, which may have bred on Bermuda and occupied the warmer waters of the western North Atlantic for millions of years as the warm-water counterpart of C. d. borealis on the other islands of the northern North Atlantic. When the Mediterranean became available for colonization, C. d. borealis entered and gave rise to the smaller C. d. diomedea as an adaptation to the warmer waters, thus becoming convergently similar in size to C. wingatei. If the Bermudan species occupied the western North Atlantic year round, it is conceivable that suitable warm-water wintering habitat may have been more of a limiting factor for C. d. diomedea than breeding habitat in the Mediterranean. Perhaps C. d. diomedea did not begin wintering in the western North Atlantic until after the extinction of C. wingatei in the Middle Pleistocene.

Acknowledgments

The Calonectris Quarry site was discovered by David B. Wingate who was instrumental in arranging for its excavation and study, in which we were assisted by Frederick V. Grady and Robert Baird. The figures are by Christina Gebhard and Brian Schmidt, Division of Birds, National Museum of Natural History (USNM), Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. I thank Lisa Green and Wolfgang Sterrer of the Bermuda Aquarium, Natural History Museum and Zoo (BAMZ) for many considerations. This is contribution #156, Bermuda Biodiversity Project (BBP), of the BAMZ.

Literature Cited

  1. E.J.R. Amos 1991. A Guide to the Birds of Bermuda. Warwick, Bermuda Published by the author. pp. Google Scholar

  2. J. Araujo, J. Muños Cobos, and F.J. Purroy . 1976. Populations of sea birds in the Cabrera archipelago (Balearic Islands). Ardea 64:83–84. Google Scholar

  3. V. Bretagnolle and B. Lequette . 1990. Structural variation in the call of the Cory's Shearwater (Calonectris diomedea, Aves, Procellariidae). Ethology 85:313–323. Google Scholar

  4. K. (C. J). Camphuysen and J. Van der Meer . 2001. Pelagic distribution, moult and (sub-) specific status of Cory's Shearwaters Calonectris [d.] diomedea/borealis wintering off southern Africa. Marine Ornithology 29:89–96. Google Scholar

  5. F. Gautier, G. Clauzon, J.-P. Suc, J. Cravatte, and D. Violanti . 1994. Age et durée de la crise de salinité messinienne. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences de Paris ser. II 318:1103–1109. Google Scholar

  6. E. Gómez-Díaz, J. González-Solís, M.A. Peinado, and R.D.M. Page . 2006. Phylogeography of the Calonectris shearwaters using molecular and morphometric data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 41:322–332. Google Scholar

  7. F.V. Grady and S.L. Olson . 2006. Fossil bats from Quaternary deposits on Bermuda (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Journal of Mammalogy 87:148–152. Google Scholar

  8. J.P. Granadeiro 1993. Variation in measurements of Cory's Shearwater between populations and sexing by discriminant analysis. Ringing and Migration 14:103–112. Google Scholar

  9. R. Gutiérrez 1998. Flight identification of Cory's and Scopoli's Shearwaters. Dutch Birding 20:216–225. Google Scholar

  10. J.C. Haney and P.A. McGillivary . 1985. Aggregations of Cory's Shearwater (Calonectris diomedea) at Gulf Stream fronts. Wilson Bulletin 97:191–200. Google Scholar

  11. C. Hazevoet 1995. The birds of the Cape Verde Islands. British Ornithologists' Union Check-list 13:1–192. Google Scholar

  12. P.J. Hearty 2002. The Ka'ena highstand of O'ahu, Hawai'i: further evidence of Antarctic ice collapse during the middle Pleistocene. Pacific Science 56:65–81. Google Scholar

  13. P.J. Hearty, P. Kindler, H. Cheng, and R.L. Edwards . 1999. Evidence for a +20 m middle Pleistocene sea-level highstand (Bermuda and Bahamas) and partial collapse of Antarctic ice. Geology 27:375–368. Google Scholar

  14. P.J. Hearty, S.L. Olson, D.S. Kaufman, R.L. Edwards, and H. Cheng . 2004. Stratigraphy and geochronology of pitfall accumulations in caves and fissures, Bermuda. Quaternary Science Reviews 23:1151–1171. Google Scholar

  15. P. Heidrich, J. Amengual, and M. Wink . 1998. Phylogenetic relationships in Mediterranean and North Atlantic shearwaters (Aves: Procellariidae) based on nucleotide sequences of mtDNA. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 26:145–170. Google Scholar

  16. P. Heidrich, D. Ristow, and M. Wink . 1996. Differenzierung von Gelb-und Schwarzschabelsturmtauchern (Calonectris diomedea, Puffinus puffinus, P. yelkouan) und Grossmöwen des Silbermöwenkomplexes (Larus argentatus, L. fuscus, L. cachinnans). Journal für Ornithologie 137:287–294. Google Scholar

  17. C. Jouanin 1976. Note sur la biometrie des puffins cendrés de Tunisie. L'Oiseau et Revue Français d'Ornitologie 46:97–102. Google Scholar

  18. N. Kuroda 1954. On the classification and phylogeny of the order Tubinares, particularly the shearwaters (Puffinus), with special consideration on their osteology and habit differentiation. Tokyo Herald Co. pp. Google Scholar

  19. D.S. Lee 1995. Marine birds off the coast of North Carolina. Chat 59:113–171. Google Scholar

  20. M. Lo Valvo and B. Massa . 1988. Considerations on a specimen of Cory's Shearwater ringed at Selvagem Grande and recovered in the Central Mediterranean. Bocagiana 124:1–5. Google Scholar

  21. B. Massa and M. Lo Valvo . 1986. 293–313. Biometrical and biological considerations on the Cory's Shearwater Calonectris diomedea. MEDMARAVIS and X. Monbailliu , editors. in. Mediterranean Marine Avifauna Population Studies and Conservation. Berlin Springer-Verlag. pp. Google Scholar

  22. G.M. Mathews and T. Iredale . 1915. On some petrels from the north-east Pacific Ocean. Ibis, ser 10 3:572–609. Google Scholar

  23. J.-L. Mougin, C. Jouanin, and F. Roux . 1988. Les migrations du puffin cendré Calonectris diomedea. L'Oiseau et la Revue Française d'Ornithologie 58:308–319. Google Scholar

  24. S.L. Olson 1985. An early Pliocene marine avifauna from Duinefontein, Cape Province, South Africa. Annals of the South African Museum 95:147–164. Google Scholar

  25. S.L. Olson 2004a. Taxonomic review of the fossil Procellariidae (Aves: Procellariiformes) described from Bermuda by R. W. Shufeldt. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 117:575–581. Google Scholar

  26. S.L. Olson 2004b. A fossil of the Great Auk (Penguinus impennis) from Middle Pleistocene deposits on Bermuda. Atlantic Seabirds 5:[for 2003]81–84. Google Scholar

  27. S.L. Olson and P.J. Hearty . 2003. Extirpation of a breeding colony of Short-tailed Albatross (Phoebastria albatrus) on Bermuda by Pleistocene sea-level rise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A 100:12825–12829. Google Scholar

  28. S.L. Olson and P.J. Hearty . Direct paleontological and sedimentary evidence for a brief, sustained sea level at +21 m during MIS 11 (400 ka) in Bermuda. Quaternary Science Reviews 2009. (in press). Google Scholar

  29. S.L. Olson, P.J. Hearty, and G.K. Pregill . Geological constraints on evolution and survival in endemic reptiles on Bermuda. Journal of Herpetology 2006. 40:394–398. Google Scholar

  30. S.L. Olson and P.C. Rasmussen . C.E. Ray and D.J. Bohaska , editors. Miocene and Pliocene birds from the Lee Creek Mine, North Carolina. Geology and paleontology of the Lee Creek mine, North Carolina, III.—Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology 2001. 90:233–365. 1–365. inGoogle Scholar

  31. S.L. Olson, D.B. Wingate, P.J. Hearty, and F.V. Grady . J.A. Alcover and P. Bover , editors. Prodromus of vertebrate paleontology and geochronology of Bermuda. Insular Vertebrate Evolution: the Palaeontological Approach.—Monografies de la Societat d'Història Natural de les Balears 2005. 12:219–232. 1–390. inGoogle Scholar

  32. J. Penhallurick and M. Wink . Analysis of the taxonomy and nomenclature of the Procellariiformes based on complete nucleotide sequences of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Emu 2004. 104:125–147. Google Scholar

  33. J.L. Peters Check-list of Birds of the World. Vol. 1. 1931. Cambridge, Massachusetts Harvard University Press. pp. Google Scholar

  34. C. Rabouam, V. Bretagnolle, Y. Bigot, and G. Perique . Genetic relationships of Cory's Shearwater: parentage, mating assortment, and geographic differentiation revealed by DNA fingerprinting. Auk 2000. 117:651–662. Google Scholar

  35. E. Randi, F. Spina, and B. Massa . Genetic variability in Cory's Shearwater (Calonectris diomedea). Auk 1989. 106:411–417. Google Scholar

  36. A. Sánchez Codoñer and E.O. Albufera . E. de Juana A , editor. Pardela Cinicienta Calonectris diomedea. Noticiario ornitológico.—Ardeola 1994. 41:p. 91–91–102. inGoogle Scholar

  37. G. Sangster, C.J. Hazevoet, A.B. Van den Berg, C.S. Roselaar, and R. Sluys . Dutch avifaunal list: species concepts, taxonomic instability, and taxonomic changes in 1977–1998. Ardea 1999. 87:139–166. Google Scholar

  38. D.J. Stanley Med desert theory is drying up. Oceanus 1990. 33:14–23. Google Scholar

  39. J.-P. Suc and G. Clauzon . La crise de salinité messinienne, une histoire fabuleuse. Bulletin de la Société Fribourgeoise des Sciences Naturelles 1996. 85:9–23. Google Scholar

  40. J.-C. Thibault and V. Bretagnolle . A Mediterranean breeding colony of Cory's Shearwater Calonectris diomedea in which individuals show behavioral and biometric characters of the Atlantic subspecies. Ibis 1998. 140:523–528. Google Scholar

  41. K.H. Voous H.J. Frith and J.H. Calaby , editors. The birds of the tropical “Middle Seas”, past and present. 1976. 697–704. in. Proceedings of the 16th International Ornithological Congress, Canberra, Australia, 12–17 August 1974:1–765.  Google Scholar

  42. M. Wink and D. Ristow . Zur Biometrie des Sexualdimorphismus beim Gelbschabelsturmtaucher (Calonectris diomedea). Vogelwarte 1979. 30:135–138. Google Scholar

  43. H.-H. Witt, E. de Juana, and J.M. Varela . Geschlechtsspezifiche Grössenunterschiede in einer westmediterranen Population des Gelbschnabelsturmtauchers (Calonectris diomedea). Vogelwarte 1984. 32:234–236. Google Scholar

Storrs L. Olson "A new species of shearwater of the genus Calonectris (Aves: Procellariidae) from a middle Pleistocene deposit on Bermuda," Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 121(3), 398-409, (1 October 2008). https://doi.org/10.2988/08-11.1
Published: 1 October 2008
JOURNAL ARTICLE
12 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top