Translator Disclaimer
1 June 2012 A novel phylogeny-based generic classification for Chenopodium sensu lato, and a tribal rearrangement of Chenopodioideae (Chenopodiaceae)
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the subfamily Chenopodioideae of the goosefoot family (Chenopodiaceae), with the addition of matK/trnK sequences to an existing trnL-F data set, indicates that Chenopodium as traditionally recognised consists of six independent lineages. One of these, the Dysphania-Teloxys clade, had already been recognised previously as a separate tribe Dysphanieae. Of the five others, Chenopodium is here re-defined in a narrow sense so as to be monophyletic. The C. polyspermum, C. rubrum and C. murale clades are successive sisters of a lineage constituted by Atripliceae s.str. plus Chenopodium s.str. Consequently, the long forgotten genera Lipandra (for C. polyspermum) and Oxybasis (for C. rubrum and relatives) are revived, and the new genus Chenopodiastrum (for C. murale and relatives) is published. The afore-mentioned five clades, taken together, are a monophylum corresponding to an enlarged tribe Atripliceae (a name that has priority over Chenopodieae). Last, the Linnaean genus Blitum (for C. capitatum and relatives), enlarged to include C. bonus-henricus, is the sister group of Spinacia in the tribe Anserineae (a name that has priority over Spinacieae). The aromatic species of Dysphania, the related genus Teloxys, as well as Cyclocoma and Suckleya form the enlarged tribe Dysphanieae. Building upon phylogenetic results, the present study provides a modern classification for a globally distributed group of plants that had suffered a complex taxonomic history due to divergent interpretation of single morphological characters for more than two hundred years. The seven genera among which the species traditionally assigned to Chenopodium are now distributed are defined morphologically and keyed out; for four of them (Blitum, Chenopodiastrum, Lipandra, Oxybasis) the component species and subspecies are enumerated and the necessary nomenclatural transfers are effected.

See the PDF.

References

1.

P. Aellen 1927: Chenopodium crassifolium Hornem., eine verkannte europaeische Art. — Magyar Bot. Lapok 25: 55–63. Google Scholar

2.

P. Aellen 1929: Beitrag zur Systematik der Chenopodium-Arten Amerikas, vorwiegend auf Grund der Sammlung des United States National Museum in Washington, D.C. I. — Feddes Repert. 26: 31–64. Google Scholar

3.

P. Aellen 1930: Die Wolladventiven Chenopodien Europas. — Verh. Naturf. Ges. Basel 41: 77–104. Google Scholar

4.

P. Aellen 1933: Nomenklatorische Bemerkungen zu einigen Chenopodien. — Pp. 98–101 in Anon, (ed.), Ostenia. Coleccion de trabajos botanicos dedicades a Don Cornelio Osten en ocasion del LXX aniversario de su nacimiento. — Montevideo: [no publisher]. Google Scholar

5.

P. Aellen 1960–61: Chenopodiaceae. — Pp. 533–762 in: K. H. Rechinger (ed.), G. Hegi, Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa, ed. 2, 3(2[Lief. 2–4]). — Berlin & Hamburg: Parey. Google Scholar

6.

P. Aellen & T. Just 1943: Key and synopsis of the American species of the genus Chenopodium L. — Amer. Midl. Naturalist 30: 47–76. Google Scholar

7.

F. Ambrosi 1857: Flora del Tirolo meridionale. — Padova: A. Sicca. Google Scholar

8.

I. J. Bassett & C. W. Crompton 1982: The genus Chenopodium in Canada. — Canad. J. Bot. 60: 586–610. Google Scholar

9.

T. Borsch , K. W. Hilu , D. Quandt , V. Wilde , C. Neinhuis & W. Barthlott 2003: Noncoding plastid trnT-trnF sequences reveal a well resolved phylogeny of basal angiosperms. —  J. Evol. Biol. 16: 558–576. Google Scholar

10.

J. P. M. Brenan 1954: Chenopodiaceae. — In: W. B. Turrill & E. Milne-Redhead (ed.), Flora of tropical East Africa 7. — London. Google Scholar

11.

J. P. M. Brenan & J. Akeroyd 1993: Chenopodium. — Pp. 111–114 in: T. G. Tutin, N. A. Burges, A. O. Chater, J. R. Edmonson, V. H. Heywood, D. M. Moore, D. H. Valentine, S. M. Walters & D. A. Webb (ed.), Flora europaea, ed. 2, 1. — Cambridge: Cambridge University. Google Scholar

12.

N. L. Britton & A. Brown 1913: An illustrated flora of the northern United States, Canada and the British possessions, ed. 2, 2. — New York: The New York Botanical Garden. Google Scholar

13.

R. C. Carolin 1983: The trichomes of the Chenopodiaceae and Amaranthaceae. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 103: 451–466. Google Scholar

14.

S. E. Clemants & S. L. Mosyakin 2003: Chenopodium. — Pp. 275–300 in: L. S. Welsch, W. C. Cromptom & S. E. Clemants (ed.), Flora of North America 4. — New York, etc.: Oxford University. Google Scholar

15.

H. J. N. Crantz 1766: Institutiones rei herbariae juxta nutum naturae digestae ex habitu. — Vienna: J. P. Kraus. Google Scholar

16.

R. D. Dom 1988: Chenopodium simplex, an older name for C. gigantospermum (Chenopodiaceae). — Madroño 35: 162. Google Scholar

17.

H. Flores-Olvera , A. Vrijdaghs , H. Ochoterena & E. Smets 2011: The need to re-investigate the nature of homoplastic characters: an ontogenetic case study of the ‘bracteoles’ in Atripliceae (Chenopodiaceae). — Ann. Bot. 108: 847–865. Google Scholar

18.

S. Fuentes-Bazan , G. Mansion & T. Borsch 2012: Towards a species level tree of the globally diverse genus Chenopodium (Chenopodiaceae). — Molec. Phylogenet. Evol. 62: 359–374. Google Scholar

19.

W. Greuter, H. M. Burdet & G. Long 1984: Med-Checklist 1. — Genève: Conservatoire et Jardin Botaniques & Berlin: Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum. Google Scholar

20.

V. I. Grubov 1966: Plantae Asiae Centralis 2. — Leningrad: Nauka. Google Scholar

21.

I. Hiitonen 1933: Suomen Kasvio. — Helsinki: Kustannusosakeyhtiö Otava. Google Scholar

22.

A. S. Hitchcock 1929: Standard species of Linnaean genera of phanerogamae. — Pp. 114–155 in: International Botanical Congress, Cambridge (England), 1930. Proposals by British Botanists. — London: His Majesty's Stationary Office. Google Scholar

23.

J. P. Huelsenbeck & F. Ronquist 2001: MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. —  Bioinformatics 17: 754–755. Google Scholar

24.

C. E. Jarvis 2007: Order out of chaos: Linnaean plant names and their types. — London: Linnean Society of London & Natural History Museum. Google Scholar

25.

M. Iljin 1936: Spinacia. — Pp. 75–77 in: V. L. Komarov (ed.). Flora URSS 6. — Moskva & Leningrad: Isdatel'stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR. Google Scholar

26.

M. Iljin & P. Aellen 1936: Chenopodium. — Pp. 41–73 in: V. L. Komarov (ed.), Flora URSS 6. — Moskva & Leningrad: Isdatel'stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR. Google Scholar

27.

W. S. Judd & I. K. Ferguson 1999: The genera of Chenopodiaceae in the southeastern United States. — Harvard Pap. Bot. 4: 365–416. Google Scholar

28.

G. Kadereit , T. Borsch , K. Weising & H. Freitag 2003: Phylogeny of Amaranthaceae and Chenopodiaceae and the evolution of C4 photosynthesis. — Int. J. Pl. Sci. 164: 959–986. Google Scholar

29.

G. Kadereit , E. V Mavrodiev , E. H. Zacharias & A. P. Sukhorukov 2010: Molecular phylogeny of Atripliceae (Chenopodioideae, Chenopodiaceae):. implications for systematics, biogeography, flower and fruit evolution, and the origin of C4 photosynthesis. —  Amer. J. Bot. 97: 1664–1687. Google Scholar

30.

G. S. Karelin & I. P. Kirilov 1841: Enumeration plantarum anno 1840 in regionibus altaicis et confinibus collectarum, [2]. — Bull. Soc. Imp. Naturalistes Moscou 14: 369–159, 703–770[“870”]. Google Scholar

31.

U. Kühn 1993: Chenopodiaceae. — Pp. 253–281 in: K. Kubitzki (ed.), The families and genera of vascular plants 2. — Berlin, etc.: Springer. Google Scholar

32.

C. F. Lessing 1834: Beitrag zur Flora des südlichen Urals und der Steppen. — Linnaea 9: 198–199. Google Scholar

33.

H. F. Link 1821: Enumeratio plantarum horti regii botanici Berolinensis altera. — Berolini: G. Reimer. Google Scholar

34.

C. Linnaeus 1753: Species plantarum. — Holmia: Laurentii Salvii. Google Scholar

35.

C. Löhne & T. Borsch 2005: Molecular evolution and phylogenetic utility of the petD group II intron: a case study in basal angiosperms. —  Molec. Biol. Evol. 22: 317–3327 Google Scholar

36.

J. McNeill , N. J. Turland , A. M. Monro & B. J. Lepschi 2011: XVIII International Botanical Congress: Preliminary mail vote and report of Congress action on nomenclature proposals. —  Taxon 60: 1507–1520. Google Scholar

37.

J. McNeill, F. R. Barrie, H. M. Burdet, V. Demoulin, D. L. Hawksworth, K. Marhold, D. H. Nicolson, J. Prado, P. C. Silva, J. E. Skog, J. H. Wiersema & N. J. Turland (ed. & compilers) 2006: International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Vienna Code, 2006) adopted by the Seventeenth International Botanical Congress Vienna, Austria, July 2005. — Regnum Veg. 146. Google Scholar

38.

C. A. Meyer 1829: Chenopodeae [Chenopodiaceae]. — Pp. 370–418 in: C. A. Meyer, A. Bunge & C. F. Ledebour (ed.), Flora altaica 1. — Berlin: G. Reimer. Google Scholar

39.

C. A. Meyer 1843: Die Gattungen Monolepis Schrad., Oligandra Less, und Nanophytum Less, näher characterisiert. — Bull. Cl. Phys-Math. Acad. Imp. Sci. Saint-Pétersbourg 1: 131–134. Google Scholar

40.

A. Moquin-Tandon 1849: Salsolaceae. — Pp. 43–230 in: A. P. D. Candolle (ed.), Prodromus systematics naturalis 13(2). — Paris: Treuttel & Würtz. Google Scholar

41.

S. L. Mosyakin 2002: The system and phytogeography of Chenopodium subg. Blitum I. Hiitonen (Chenopodiaceae). — Ukrayins'k. Bot. Zhurn. 59: 696–701. Google Scholar

42.

S. L. Mosyakin & S. E. Clemants 1996: New infrageneric taxa and combinations in Chenopodium L. (Chenopodiaceae). — Novon 6: 398–403. Google Scholar

43.

S. L. Mosyakin & S. E. Clemants 2002: New nomenclatural conbinations in Dysphania R. Br. (Chenopodiaceae): taxa occurring in North America. — Ukrains'k. Bot. Zhurn. 59: 380–385. Google Scholar

44.

F. Mueller 1855: Description of new Australian plants chiefly from the colony of Victoria. — Trans. & Proc. Victorian Inst. Advancem. Sci. 1: 114–135. Google Scholar

45.

J. Müller, K. F. Müller, C. Neinhuis & D. Quandt 2007: PhyDE, Phylogenetic Data Editor. — Published at  http://www.phyde.deGoogle Scholar

46.

K. F. Müller 2004: PRAP-computation of Bremer support for large data sets. —  Molec. Phylogenet. Evol. 31: 780–782. Google Scholar

47.

K. F. Müller 2005a: SeqState, primer design and sequence statistics for phylogenetic DNA data sets. — Appl. Bioinformatics 4: 65–69. Google Scholar

48.

K. F. Müller 2005b: The efficiency of different search strategies in estimating parsimony jackknife, bootstrap, and Bremer support. — BMC Evol. Biol. 5: 58. Google Scholar

49.

K. F. Müller & T. Borsch 2005: Phylogenetics of Amaranthaceae based on matK/trnK sequence data: evidence from parsimony, likelihood, and Bayesian analyses. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 92: 66–102. Google Scholar

50.

K. C. Nixon 1999: The parsimony ratchet, a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. —  Cladistics 15: 407–414. Google Scholar

51.

F. Pax 1889: Caryophyllaceae. — In: A. Engler & K. Prantl (ed.). Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien 3, 1b. — Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann. Google Scholar

52.

D. Posada 2008: jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. —  Molec. Biol. Evol. 25: 1253–1256. Google Scholar

53.

J. L. Reveal 2011+: Indices nominum supragenericorum plantarum vascularium. — Published at  http://www.plantsystematics.org/reveal/pbio/fam/allspgnames.htmlGoogle Scholar

54.

C. Schmitz-Linneweber , R. M. Maier , J.-P. Alcaraz , A. Cottet , R. G. Herrmann & R. Mache 2001: The plastid chromosome of spinach (Spinacia oleracea): complete nucleotide sequence and gene organization. —  Pl. Molec. Biol. 45: 307–315. Google Scholar

55.

P. J. F. Schur 1866: Enumeratio plantarum Transsilvaniae, exhibens. — Michigan: G. Braumüller. Google Scholar

56.

A. J. Scott 1978: A review of the classification of Chenopodium L. and related genera (Chenopodiaceae). — Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 100: 205–220. Google Scholar

57.

L. Shults 2003: Spinacia. — P. 302 in: L. S. Welsch, W. C. Cromptom & S. E. Clemants (ed.), Flora of North America 4. — New York: Oxford University. Google Scholar

58.

M. P. Simmons & H. Ochoterena 2000: Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. —  Syst. Biol. 49: 369–381. Google Scholar

59.

P. C. Standley 1916: Chenopodiaceae. — Pp. 1–93 in: North American flora 21(1). – New York: New York Botanic Garden. Google Scholar

60.

A. P. Sukhorukov 1999: Eine neue asiatische Chenopodium-Art aus der Sektion Pseudoblitum Hook. f. (Chenopodiaceae). — Feddes Repert. 110: 493–497. Google Scholar

61.

D. L. Swofford 1998: PAUP* Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods), version 4. 0b.10. — Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer Associates. Google Scholar

62.

J. T. B. Syme (ed.) 1868: J. Sowerby & J. E. Smith , English botany, ed. 3[B], 8. — London: R. Hartwicke. Google Scholar

63.

N. Tzvelev 1960: De speciebus nonnulis novis vel minus cognitis e Pamir. — Bot. Mater. Gerb. Bot. Inst. V. L. Komarova Akad. Nauk SSSR 20: 399–439. Google Scholar

64.

N. Tzvelev 1996: Flora Europae orientalis 9. — St. Petersbourg: Acad. Sci., Rossicae Inst. Bot. Nomine V. L. Komarov. Google Scholar

65.

E. Ulbrich 1934: Chenopodiaceae. — Pp. 379–584 in: A. Engler & K. Prantl (ed.), Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, ed. 2, 16c. — Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann. Google Scholar

66.

P. Uotila 1974: Pollen morphology in European species of Chenopodium sect. Chenopodium, with special reference to C. album and C. suecicum. — Ann. Bot. Fenn. 11: 44–58. Google Scholar

67.

P. Uotila 1979: Chenopodium exsuccum, a neglected species of the C. foliosum aggregate. — Ann. Bot. Fenn. 16: 237–240. Google Scholar

68.

P. Uotila 1993: Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on Chenopodium in the Flora iranica area. — Ann. Bot. Fenn. 30: 189–194. Google Scholar

69.

P. Uotila 1997: Chenopodium, Spinacia. — Pp. 24–63 in: I. C. Hedge (ed.), Flora iranica 172. — Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt. Google Scholar

70.

P. Uotila 2001a: Chenopodium. — Pp. 13–52 in: Ali S. I. & Qaiser M., Flora of Pakistan 204. — Karachi: Karachi University & St Louis: Missouri Botanic Garden. Google Scholar

71.

P. Uotila 2001b: Chenopodium. — Pp. 4–31 in: B. Jonsell (ed.), Flora nordica 2. — Stockholm: Bergius Foundation, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. Google Scholar

72.

P. Uotila 2001c: Taxonomie and nomenclataural notes on Chenopodium (Chenopodiaceae) for Flora Nordica. — Ann. Bot. Fenn. 38: 95–97. Google Scholar

73.

S. Watson 1874: Revision of the North American Chenopodiaceae. — Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts Sci. 9: 82–126. Google Scholar

74.

P. Wilson 1983: Chenopodiaceae. — Pp. 81–317 in: A. S. George (ed.), Flora of Australia 4. — Canberra: Australian Government Publ. Service. Google Scholar

75.

E. H. Zacharias & B. G. Baldwin 2010 : A molecular phylogeny of North American Atripliceae (Chenopodiaceae), with implications for floral and photosynthetic pathway evolution. —  Syst. Bot. 35: 839–857. Google Scholar
© 2012 BGBM Berlin-Dahlem.
Susy Fuentes-Bazan, Pertti Uotila, and Thomas Borsch "A novel phylogeny-based generic classification for Chenopodium sensu lato, and a tribal rearrangement of Chenopodioideae (Chenopodiaceae)," Willdenowia 42(1), 5-24, (1 June 2012). https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.42.42101
Published: 1 June 2012
JOURNAL ARTICLE
20 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top