Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 July 2018 Euro+Med-Checklist Notulae, 9
Eckhard Von Raab-Straube, Thomas Raus
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

This is the ninth of a series of miscellaneous contributions, by various authors, where hitherto unpublished data relevant to both the Med-Checklist and the Euro+Med (or Sisyphus) projects are presented. This instalment deals with the families Amaranthaceae, Amaryllidaceae (incl. Alliaceae), Apocynaceae, Araceae (incl. Lemnaceae), Asparagaceae (incl. Hyacinthaceae), Cactaceae, Cannaceae, Caprifoliaceae, Commelinaceae, Compositae, Convolvulaceae, Crassulaceae, Cruciferae, Euphorbiaceae, Leguminosae, Malvaceae (incl. Tiliaceae), Neuradaceae, Nyctaginaceae, Orobanchaceae, Polygonaceae and Solanaceae. It includes new country and area records and taxonomic and distributional considerations for taxa in Achyranthes, Allium, Brassica, Canna, Catharanthus, Chlorophytum, Convolvulus, Corchorus, Dipcadi, Hieracium, Ipomoea, Lablab, Lonicera, Mercurialis, Mirabilis, Neurada, Opuntia, Orobanche, Phelipanche, Polygonum, Solanum, Spirodela, Tradescantia, Vinca and Wolffia, new combinations in Hieracium and Phelipanche, and a replacement name in Sempervivum.

Citation: Raab-Straube E. von & Raus Th. (ed.) 2018: Euro+Med-Checklist Notulae, 9 [Notulae ad floram euromediterraneam pertinentes No. 38]. — Willdenowia 48: 195–220. doi: https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.48.48203

Version of record first published online on 20 July 2018 ahead of inclusion in August 2018 issue.

Notice

A succinct description of the Euro+Med project, with a list of recognized territories and their abbreviations, and the conventions used to indicate the status and presence of taxa, can be found in the introduction to the first instalment of the Euro+Med Notulae (Greuter & Raab-Straube 2005: 223–226) and on the Euro+Med PlantBase website (Euro+Med 2006+). For the previous instalment of the Euro+Med-Checklist Notulae, see Raab-Straube & Raus (2017).

The following have contributed entries to the present instalment: G. Barsotti, A. Borzatti de Loewenstern, G. Domina, Š. Duraki, R. El Mokni, H. Freitag, V. Holzgreve, D. Iamonico, M. Jovanoviacute;, B. Kreinsen, V. Lazzeri, M. Niketić, E. von Raab-Straube, Th. Raus, S. Rätzel, M. Ristow, I. V. Tatanov, J.-M. Tison and H. Uhlich.

Amaranthaceae

Achyranthes aspera L.

  • + Tn: Tunisia: Nabeul, Dar Chichon, 36°57′41″N, 10°58′52″E, 60 m, part of herbaceous plant succession in undergrowth of maquis of Olea europaea L. and Pistacia lentiscus L. with Quercus coccifera L. and planted Eucalyptus spp., 1 May 2014, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir, HFLA). – As part of ongoing research on Amaranthaceae s. str. and on the vascular flora of Tunisia (e.g. El Mokni & al. 2013, 2016; Iamonico 2014a, 2014b, 2015a; Iamonico & Jarvis 2012; Iamonico & Sánchez Del Pino 2014, 2016; Iamonico & El Mokni 2017, 2018), many populations identifiable as Achyranthes aspera, occupying an area of some hectares, were found in the forest of Dar Chichou in the Cap Bon region. Achyranthes aspera was previously known to occur in N Africa only in Egypt (Iamonico 2015b+ and references therein). Concerning Tunisia, all the former records of Achyranthes refer to A. sicula (L.) All. (Bonnet & Barratte 1896; Greuter & al. 1984; Le Floc'h & Boulos 2008; Le Floc'h & al. 2010; Dobignard & Chatelain 2011a).

    Achyranthes aspera is morphologically similar to A. sicula, from which it differs in having the stem pubescent (vs glabrescent or nearly so in A. sicula) and the leaves green on both surfaces (vs white tomentose on the abaxial surface in A. sicula) (Bao & al. 2003; Robertson 2003; Iamonico 2017). Furthermore, A. aspera is a very variable species morphologically. In fact, several taxa were described in the past (see, e.g., Tropicos 2018+), and some authors recognized one or more varieties, namely A. aspera var. aspera, A. aspera var. indica L., A. aspera var. villosior (Hensl.) D. M. Porter, which differ from each other in characters of stems (indumentum) and leaves (shape, apex, colour). However, ongoing studies carried out by one of us (D.I.) show that all forms of A. aspera always display leaves green on both surfaces (never white tomentose as in A. sicula; see also Bao & al. 2003). According to Iamonico (2015b+), we therefore prefer to consider A. sicula as a separate species and A. aspera in the wide sense. However, further investigations (especially with molecular methods, which are still lacking for A. sicula) are necessary to reach a final taxonomic decision on these taxa.

    D. Iamonico & R. El Mokni

Fig. 1.

Allium litardierei – A: habitat and habit; B: typical inflorescence; C: bulbs. – Tunisia: Bizerte, Mateur, Sidi El Bechir, 17/18 Jun 2014, photographs by R. El Mokni.

f01_195.jpg

Amaryllidaceae (incl. Alliaceae)

Allium litardierei J.-M. Tison – Fig. 1.

  • + Tn: Tunisia: Bizerte, Mateur, Sidi El Bechir, 36°55′30″N, 09°28′49″E, 325 m, degraded scrubland, 17/18 Jun 2014, El Mokni (herb. El Mokni); ibid., Sidi Nsir to Joumine, 36°54′35″N, 09°25′40″E, 280 m, degraded scrubland, 17/18 Jun 2014, El Mokni (herb. El Mokni); Béja, Nefza south, 36°54′14″N, 09°06′42″E, 145 m, scrubland, 17/18 Jun 2014, El Mokni (herb. El Mokni). – Populations identifiable as Allium litardierei were found as part of ongoing updating and improving knowledge on the Tunisian vascular flora (e.g. El Mokni & al. 2014, 2015a, 2015b, 2015c; Sukhorukov & al. 2016; El Mokni & Domina 2017; El Mokni & Iamonico 2017; El Mokni & Véla 2017; El Mokni & Verloove 2017; Iamonico & El Mokni 2017, 2018). Allium litardierei is a N African species recorded in Algeria and Morocco, with doubtful/probable presence for Tunisia (cf. Tison 2010). Neither the recent Tunisian checklist (Le Floch'h & al. 2010) nor the online African flora database (APD 2018) recorded or confirmed this species in Tunisia. Our discovery (June 2014) is therefore the first concerning the native Tunisian flora and includes several populations located mainly on clayey soils in degraded scrublands of calcareous mountains in N Tunisia (govenorates of Béja and Bizerte). The plants occur in an area of about 1000 km2 and seem actually not to be threatened by human activities and/or interspecific competition.

    R. El Mokni & J.-M. Tison

Apocynaceae

Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don

  • A Tn: Tunisia: Nabeul, Nabeul city, 36°27′32″N, 10°44′49″E, 13 m, roadsides, 11 Dec 2016, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir). – A perennial, evergreen herb native to Madagascar, widely cultivated as an ornamental and more recently as a medicinal plant, used as the source of the drugs vincristine and vinblastine to treat cancer, now found growing feral in many warmtemperate to subtropical regions of the world. In the Euro+Med region the taxon is reported as naturalized in the Canary Islands and as a casual alien in Crete (Yannitsaros 2006). In the African Plant Database (APD 2018) the taxon is listed only as cultivated in Morocco. The present report as a casual alien is therefore the first for the Tunisian flora, considered an introduced ornamental locally escaped from cultivation.

    R. El Mokni

Vinca difformis Pourr.

  • + Tn: Tunisia: Jendouba, Béni Métir, 36°44′22″N, 08°44′17″E, 475 m, Quercus forests, 30 Mar 2006, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Bizerte); ibid., Oued Zéen, 36°49′27″N, 08°50′00″E, 355 m, Quercus forests, 19 Mar 2018, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir). – First records for Tunisia. Given as native to the W and C Mediterranean countries from Portugal eastwards to Italy (Marhold 2011a+). For N Africa it was reported from Morocco and Algeria with no mention for Tunisia (Le Floc'h & al. 2010; Dobignard & Chatelain 2011a; Marhold 2011a+; APD 2018).

    R. El Mokni

Vinca major L.

  • N Tn: Tunisia: Jendouba, Ain Draham, 36°46′34″N, 08°40′54″E, 715 m, Quercus forests, 4 Apr 2012, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Bizerte); ibid., Fernana, 36°39′54″N, 08°41′10″E, 290 m, Quercus suber L. forests, 18 Mar 2018, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir); ibid., Tabarka, 36°57′30″N, 08°45′17″E, 9 m, coastal vegetation, 27 Feb 2013, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Bizerte); ibid., Tabarka, 36°55′40″N, 08°47′28″E, 30 m, Quercus suber vegetation, 7 Mar 2017, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir). – In the Euro+Med area considered native in S Europe from Spain to the W Balkans; additionally given as a naturalized or casual alien in adjacent areas from the Atlantic coast (Ireland, Norway, Portugal) eastwards to the Levant (Marhold 2011a+). For N Africa, it was reported from Morocco and Algeria as cultivated (doubtfully escaping) with no mention for Tunisia (Marhold 2011a+; Le Floc'h & al. 2010; Dobignard & Chatelain 2011a; APD 2018). In Tunisia it was first found in 2012 in Quercus forests of Aïn Draham in the NW part of the country, where it was re-collected during the 12th OPTIMA Iter Mediterraneum in 2014 (Greuter & Domina 2015: 28, without status information). For Tunisia, the species is considered here as an introduced ornamental plant that has become locally established in suitable habitats outside cultivation.

    R. El Mokni.

Vinca minor L.

  • N Tn: Tunisia: Jendouba, Ain Draham, Col des Ruines, 36°46′58″N, 08°41′11″E, 725 m, Quercus forests, 4 Apr 2012, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Bizerte). – Native to Europe from Portugal to the Caucasus (Davis 1978: 163), but not mentioned for N Africa (Marhold 2011a+; Le Floc’h & al. 2010; Dobignard & Chatelain 2011a; APD 2018). First record for Tunisia (and N Africa), as locally naturalized in Quercus forests of the NW part of the country.

    R. El Mokni

Araceae (incl. Lemnaceae)

Spirodela polyrhiza (L.) Schleid.

  • + Tn: Tunisia: Bizerte, Douaar Jaafar toward Teskraya, 37°13′57″N, 09°42′11″E, 40 m, agricultural effluent sewers, 14 May 2014, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir, PAL). – Spirodela polyrhiza is a nearly cosmopolitan species, native to Eurasia, Africa, North America, Australia and possibly naturalized in Hawaii. This taxon was until now known in many countries around the Mediterranean area (Uotila 2009+), but with no mention for Tunisia (Uotila 2009+; Le Floc'h & al. 2010; Dobignard & Chatelain 2010; APD 2018), until a large population was found in agricultural sewers in the surroundings of Tinja and Teskraya. The plants occupy an area of c. 300 m2 within watercourses and swamps and seem to be recently introduced, possibly by birds. They may have been overlooked or misidentified in the past.

    R. El Mokni & G. Domina

Fig. 2.

A–C: Dipcadi fulvum; A, B: inflorescences showing flowers with brownish reddish tepals; C: immature capsule. – D: Dipcadi serotinum, flower with brownish yellowish tepals. – Tunisia: Nabeul, Hammamet south, Hammam Bent Jedidi, 27 Mar 2014, photographs by R. El Mokni.

f02_195.jpg

Wolffia arrhiza (L.) Wimm.

  • + Tn: Tunisia: Bizerte, Douaar Jaafar toward Teskraya, 37°13′57″N, 09°42′11″E, 40 m, agricultural effluent sewers, 14 May 2014, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir, PAL). – Wolffia arrhiza is native to Europe, N Africa (only to Morocco and Algeria), and parts of Asia. It is present in other parts of the world as a naturalized species and is here reported for Tunisia, where it has not been mentioned before (Uotila 2009+; Le Floc'h & al. 2010; Dobignard & Chatelain 2010; APD 2018). Many populations were found in agricultural sewers in the surroundings of Tinja and Teskraya. The species forms very dense patches in the watercourses, sloughs and marshes of the area. It could have spread there from Algeria during recent years and previously could have been confused with species of Lemna.

    R. El Mokni & G. Domina

Asparagaceae (incl. Hyacinthaceae)

Chlorophytum comosum (Thunb.) Jacques

  • A Tn: Tunisia: Bizerte, Bizerte city, 37°17′04″N, 09°52′22″E, 3 m, escape from pots in public gardens, 11 May 2017, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir); Monastir, Monastir city, 35°46′11″N, 10°49′38″E, 16 m, roadsides, 9 Aug 2016, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir). – A perennial plant native to tropical and subtropical Africa, naturalized in other parts of the world including Western Australia (Howell & al. 1958), but not reported from the Mediterranean basin so far (Euro+Med 2006+). The African Plant Database (APD 2018) accepts the taxon as introduced for N Africa without any precise area of occurrence. The present report as a casual alien is therefore the first for the Tunisian flora. Plants grown as ornamentals produce clonal plantlets that readily root to produce new plants and easily escape from pots.

    R. El Mokni

Dipcadi fulvum (Cav.) Webb & Berthel. (≡ D. serotinum var. fulvum (Cav.) Ball) – Fig. 2A–C.

  • + Tn: Tunisia: Nabeul, Hammamet south, Hammam Bent Jedidi, 36°23′33″N, 10°20′17″E, 75 m, very degraded lands covered with thermophilous plant communities under Pinus halepensis Mill., 27 Mar 2014, El Mokni (herb. El Mokni). – Dipcadi fulvum has not been mentioned before for the Tunisian vascular flora (see, e.g., Le Floc'h & al. 2010; Dobignard & Chatelain 2010; APD 2018). In N Africa, the taxon is recorded in Algeria (Véla & Mostari 2013) and Morocco (APD 2018), whereas in Europe it is reported as native to the Canaries and Portugal (Webb & Berthelot 1842–1850; APD 2018). The present report is therefore the first for the native Tunisian flora and refers to a population with several individuals, growing on loamy-sandy soils in degraded land in calcareous mountains. The plants occur in an area of c. 6000 m2 and seem actually not to be threatened by human activities or interspecific competition. Both D. fulvum and D. serotinum (L.) Medik. (Fig. 2D) were found within the same extended area and during the same time period.

    R. El Mokni

Cactaceae

Opuntia stricta (Haw.) Haw.

  • P Gr: Greece: E Makedonia, Nomos and Eparchia of Chalkidiki, Kalives Poligirou, 40°17′16″N, 23°23′38″ E, 20 m, c. 1 km from the Aegean seashore, on the NE outskirts of the village, thriving on the remains of an abandoned farmstead, on flat ground, on a mound about 1 m high, as well as on a decaying wooden roof of a nearby deserted house, 9 Jul 2017, Jovanović (photo); ibid., between Agios Nikolaos and Ormos Panagias, 40°14′50″N, 23°43′22″ E, 3 m, at the base of a rocky outcrop c. 15 m from a sandy beach, several bushy clones of different size and age, 11 Jul 2017, Jovanović (photo). – Opuntia stricta, not previously reported from Greece, is a medium-sized species of cactus (to 2 m tall), endemic to the subtropical and tropical coastal areas of SE North America (South Carolina to E Texas), the Caribbean and Mexico, and is introduced to South Africa and Australia (Pinkava 2003: 133). Also in the Mediterranean basin, this xenophyte is reported to be established in S France, Italy (incl. Sardinia and Sicily), Morocco and Libya (Korotkova & Raab-Straube 2017+). Although remnants of former cultivation, the populations observed on the N coast of the Aegean have obviously been spreading for a longer period without human support and are therefore considered on the verge of naturalization. The determination of the material has been verified by Valerio Lazzeri, botanist at the Museum of Natural History of the Mediterranean in Livorno, and confirmed by Urs Eggli (Sukkulenten-Sammlung Zürich). Smaller than O. ficus-indica L. in all parts, the species is distinguished chiefly by its margins of stem segments appearing somewhat undulate between the raised areoles (see drawing in Pinkava 2003: 134, available at  http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=38199&flora_id=1).

    M. Jovanović & Th. Raus

Cannaceae

Canna indica L.

  • N Tn: Tunisia: Bizerte, Louata, 37°13′26″N, 09°44′42″E, 2 m, river passing under principal road to city centre, 13 Jul 2013, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Bizerte); Béja, Ouachteta, 36°57′54″N, 09°00′42″E, 18 m, marshy depression by dam, 1 Jul 2015, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir); Jendouba, Tabarka, 36°56′16″N, 08°47′24″E, 1 m, marshy depression, 1 Aug 2017, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir). – A rhizomatous herb native to tropical America including the Caribbean and a very popular ornamental plant throughout the tropical world (GISD 2015). In the Mediterranean area, the taxon is reported so far only as an alien with unknown status in the Iberian peninsula, with no report for N Africa (Euro+Med 2006+; Dobignard & Chatelain 2013; APD 2018). It is here reported for the first time outside cultivation for Tunisia and N Africa. Many scattered small populations have been observed since 2005 mainly in N Tunisia, growing in thickets, crowding out other plants and occupying more and more space. Their spreading mainly by rhizomes makes the plants difficult to remove. Therefore, according to the definitions given by Pyšek & al. (2004), the species can be considered as fully naturalized in Tunisia.

    R. El Mokni

Caprifoliaceae

Lonicera japonica Thunb.

  • A Tn: Tunisia: Jendouba, Tabarka, 36°56′58″N, 08°46′22″E, 2 m, roadsides in Ulmus procera Salisb. plantations, 16 May 2018, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir). – A semi-evergreen perennial climber native to E Asia (Gleason & Cronquist 1963; Lee & al. 1990), which has become naturalized in other parts of the world, e.g. across the S United States from California to New England (Hickman 1993; Clapham & al. 1962) and in Atlantic and Mediterranean parts of Europe. For N African countries, however, it is reported only from Algeria as an alien with unknown status (Raab-Straube 2017a+). The African Plant Database (APD 2018) does not report this taxon for N African countries at all. The present report is therefore the first for the Tunisian flora as a casual alien, i.e. a local escape from horticultural introduction.

    R. El Mokni

Commelinaceae

Tradescantia fluminensis Vell.

Tradescantia pallida (Rose) D. R. Hunt

  • A Tn: Tunisia: Jendouba, Ain Draham, 36°47′47″N, 08°41′00″E, 620 m, roadsides under trees in plantation of Pinus pinaster Aiton, 27 Sep 2013, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir). – This xenophyte, native to Mexico (Govaerts 2012; USDA-ARS 2018), is now widely grown as an ornamental and houseplant in many tropical and subtropical regions including North, Central and South America, the West Indies, South Africa, the Canary Islands, Madeira and Myanmar (Govaerts 2012; USDA-ARS 2018). In the Euro-Mediterranean area, the taxon is not yet reported except as an alien with unknown status in the Canary Islands (Euro+Med 2006+; Dobignard & Chatelain 2010; APD 2018). The present report is therefore the first for Tunisia and N Africa as a casual alien, i.e. a local escape from horticultural introduction.

    R. El Mokni

Compositae (Asteraceae)

Hieracium andrasovszkyi Zahn subsp. andrasovszkyi

  • + Al: Albania: “Albanien: Korabgebirge ob Radomir, 2200 m (Andrasovszky)!” (Zahn 1922: 1033). – In Greuter (2006+), the F.Y.R. Makedonija is listed as the only area where the type subspecies of Hieracium andrasovszkyi occurs. From the protologue, however, it is certain that the gathering was made above the village of Radomira in Albania.

  • + Sr: Serbia: Šar Planina, Ošljak, above Virovi, c. 1950 m, limestone, rock crevices in Pinus mugo Turra zone, 22 Jul 1988, Niketić (BEO).

    The subspecies is also new to Serbia, for which only Hieracium andrasovszkyi subsp. cremnophilum O. Behr & al. and H. andrasovszkyi subsp. kobilicanum O. Behr & al. were known (Greuter 2006+). The origin of the species was interpreted by Zahn (1922) as “H. naegelianum–pilosum”. It belongs to a group of plants described by Behr & al. (1937, 1939) that have until recently been neglected. They have been known only from a local mountainous area of the present-day W F.Y.R. Makedonija (near the Albanian border), and so far their chorology and taxonomy have not been considered. Six taxa from this group will be dealt with in the following notes as new taxa for Serbia (Kosovo, Šar Planina).

    Š. Duraki & M. Niketić

Hieracium bohatschianum subsp. platytrigonodon O. Behr & al.

  • + Sr: Serbia: Šar Planina, Crni Vrh, right side of ridge toward Bevgrod peak, c. 2150 m, limestone, pastures and scrub, 4 Aug 2014, Duraki (BEO). – This subspecies belongs to an endemic SE European species previously known from Romania, F.Y.R. Makedonija and Greece. According to Zahn (1922), the species might have arisen by hybridization between Hieracium sparsum Friv. and H. schmidtii Tausch (“H. pallidum” sensu Zahn, non Biv.). We believe that one of the progenitors of the subspecies H. bohatschianum subsp. platytrigonodon could be H. schmidtii subsp. balkanum (R. Uechtr. ex Pančić) Niketić (see below).

    Š. Duraki & M. Niketić

Hieracium crocatum Fr.

  • + Mk: F.Y.R. Makedonija: Mt Korab, Ribnička skala, c. 1900 m, silicate, rocky places on edge of Fagus forest, 22 Jul 2016, Niketić & al. (BEO); Dlaboka reka [river], Gropa Fongot, 1750–1800 m, silicate, screes on edge of Fagus forest, 22 Jul 2016, Niketić & al. (BEO).

  • + Sr: Serbia: Šar Planina, Drajčići village to Crni Vrh, pastures and rocky places, 18 Jul 1978, Nikolić & al. (BEO det. Niketić); Ošljak, c. 1400 m, limestone, 4 Sep 1997, Stevanović (BEO det. Niketić); Kobilica, Treskavac, c. 2300 m, limestone, pastures, 26 Jul 2004, Duraki (BEO); Crni Vrh, pass to Mali Vrh peak, c. 2000 m, silicate, pastures, 25 Jul 2015, Duraki (BEO).

    During an excursion on Mt Korab in 2016, unusual specimens resembling Hieracium prenanthoides Vill. were found. Further survey of the herbarium material showed that the plant (H. crocatum) was derived from natural hybridization between H. prenanthoides and H. umbellatum L. Earlier exsiccates of the same species from Šar Planina in Serbia and F.Y.R. Makedonija were also found and are mentioned here. So far, the plant has been known from the Balkans only from Bosnia, as H. crocatum subsp. valdefrondosum K. Malý & Zahn. Our specimens are morphologically different from those from Bosnia, e.g. they have a much smaller number of stem leaves. Their infraspecific status has remained unresolved and therefore has not been specified here.

    Š. Duraki & M. Niketić

Hieracium djimilense subsp. brachytrichophyes O. Behr & al.

  • + Sr: Serbia: Šar Planina, Prevalac pass to Jažinačko lake, c. 1400 m, silicate, rocky places in Pinus peuce Griseb. zone, 29 Sep 1991, Niketić (BEO); Stojkova Kuća hut, c. 1300 m, silicate, rocky places in Pinus peuce zone, 1 Oct 1991, Niketić (BEO); Kobilica, Treskavac, Sedlo, c. 2300 m, limestone, rocky pastures, 20 Jun 2006, Niketić & Duraki (BEO); Kobilica, above abandoned border fort, c. 1700 m, silicate, rocky places, 19 Aug 2006, Niketić & Duraki (BEO); Crni Vrh, foothill, c. 1500 m, silicate, 31 Jul 2008, Niketić & Duraki (BEO); Crni Vrh, c. 2150 m, silicate, cirque, 4 Aug 2014, Duraki (BEO); Crni Vrh, right side of ridge toward Bevgrod peak, c. 2200 m, limestone, pastures, 4 Aug 2014, Duraki (BEO); Konjuška, rise between first and second plateaus, c. 2120 m, silicate, clearing in Juniperus and Vaccinium scrub, 5 Aug 2015, Duraki (BEO). – Three subspecies of Hieracium djimilense Boiss. & Balausa have been mentioned from Stara Planina in E Serbia, but in our opinion only H. djimilense subsp. velenovskyi (Freyn) Zahn really belongs to that species. Another subspecies, H. djimilense subsp. brachytrichophyes is endemic to the Scardic mountains, described from the present-day F.Y.R. Makedonija (Mt Korab) and now recorded also from Sar Planina in Serbia (Kosovo). It is a relatively common Hieracium in Šar Planina occurring from the Fagus and Pinus peuce forests to the alpine zone on different geological substrates.

    Š. Duraki & M. Niketić

Hieracium jurassicum Griseb. subsp. jurassicum

  • + Cg: Montenegro: Mt Durmitor, Crno Jezero lake, c. 1450 m, limestone, Picea forest, 20 Aug 1991, Niketić (BEO); Skakala to Sušičko lake, c. 1350 m, limestone, mixed Picea and Fagus forest, 20 Jul 1993, Niketić (BEO); Škrka lake to Skakala, c. 1700 m, limestone, mixed Picea and Fagus forest, 20 Jul 1993, Niketić (BEO); Virak settlement, c. 1530 m, limestone, mixed forest with Fagus sylvatica L. and Acer heldreichii Orph., edge of forest, 20 Jul 1993, Niketić (BEO).

  • + Sr: Serbia: Šar Planina, Crni Vrh, Šmit, c. 1700 m, silicate, Fagus forest, 1 Aug 2015, Duraki (BEO).

    In the Balkan peninsula, the type subspecies was previously known from Bosnia and Montenegro (Zahn 1939), although the record from Montenegro (Mt Durmitor) was omitted in Greuter (2006+). We confirmed its presence on Mt Durmitor at several localities. The same plant has also recently been found in F.Y.R. Makedonija, at Šar Planina and Suva Gora (Teofilovski 2014, as Hieracium jurassicum). Until now, only the stenoendemic subspecies H. jurassicum subsp. papyraceum (Zahn) Greuter was known in the flora of Serbia, although a possible presence of the type subspecies was indicated by Zahn (Zahn 1939, as “H. juranum subsp. juranum”): “Bosnien: Veliki Stolac” near the Serbian border.

    Š. Duraki & M. Niketić

Hieracium jurassicum subsp. subperfoliatum (Arv.-Touv.) Greuter

  • + Cg: Montenegro: Mt Durmitor, Šušičko lake to Škrka lake, c. 1000 m, limestone, Fagus forest, 18 Jul 1991; Malo Škrško lake, c. 1800 m, limestone, subalpine Fagus forest, 20 Jul 1992, Niketić (BEO); Jablan Bara lake, c. 1700 m, limestone, 20 Aug 1996, 4 Aug 2003, Niketić (BEO); Virak, c. 1500 m, limestone, forest of Fagus sylvatica L. and Acer heldreichii Orph., 12 Aug 1997, Niketić (BEO). – A possible presence in Montenegro was previously indicated by Zahn (Zahn 1939, as “Hieracium juranum subsp. subperfoliatum”): “Bosnien: Am Vetemik der Ljubicua pl.”, because that locality is along the border with Montenegro. Zahn's record was the only one previously known from the Balkans.

    Š. Duraki & M. Niketić

Hieracium naegelianum subsp. maglicense Beck & Zahn

  • – Mk: This subspecies was described from Mt Maglić on the border of Bosnia and Montenegro. Another record originated from Behr & al. (1937): Šar Planina (Kobilica) on the border of Serbia and F.Y.R. Makedonija. At the same locality we collected similar plants with several stellate hairs on the base of the involucres. A detailed survey showed that they actually belong to very small individuals of Hieracium oroglaucum O. Behr & al. (see below).

    Š. Duraki & M. Niketić

Hieracium oroglaucum O. Behr & al. subsp. oroglaucumFig. 3.

  • + Cg: Montenegro: Prokletije mountains, Maja Sapica, silicate, c. 2100 m, rocky places in Pinus peuce Griseb. zone, 7 Jul 1994, Niketić (BEO); Maja Sapica, near Sapica lake, silicate, c. 1900 m, rocky places in Pinus peuce zone, 9 Jul 1994, Niketić (BEO).

  • + Sr: Serbia: Šar Planina, Prevalac pass to Jažinačko lake, c. 1400 m, silicate, rocky places in Pinus peuce zone, 29 Sep 1991, Niketić (BEO); Stojkova Kuća hut, c. 1300 m, silicate, rocky places in Pinus peuce zone, 1 Oct 1991, Niketić (BEO); Kobilica, Treskavac, Sedlo, c. 2300 m, limestone, rocky pastures, 20 Jun 2006, Niketić & Duraki (BEO); Kobilica, Ljubinjske Uši pass, c. 2160 m, limestone, rocky pastures, 20 Jun 2006, Niketić & Duraki (BEO); Dukat Planina, Karamanica, Beli Kamen to Golemi Vrh, c. 1700 m, silicate, rocky pastures and stony places, 29 Jun 2016, Niketić & Tomović (BEO).

    Hieracium oroglaucum subsp. oroglaucum is a Balkan endemic plant previously known only from Mt Korab in F.Y.R. Makedonija (Behr & al. 1937, 1939). During our field research we found it in a much wider area of the C Balkans (Fig. 3). The origin of this polymorphic species was interpreted by Behr & al. (1937) as “H. naegelianum > pseudobifidum (transylvanicum-bifidum)”.

    Š. Duraki & M. Niketić

Hieracium schmidtii subsp. argyrosericeum (O. Behr & al.) Greater

  • + Sr: Serbia: Šar Planina, Crni Vrh, Gornji Jelovarnik, c. 1900 m, silicate, pastures above tree line, 27 Jun 2015, Duraki (BEO). – Also previously known from Mt Korab (Behr & al. 1937). New to Serbia.

    Š. Duraki & M. Niketić

Hieracium schmidtii subsp. balkanum (R. Uechtr. ex Pančić) Niketić, comb. nov.Hieracium balkanum R. Uechtr. ex Pančić in Glasn. Srpskog Učenog Društva 53: 206. 1883 ≡ Hieracium djimilense subsp. balkanum (R. Uechtr. ex Pančić) Zahn in Engler, Pflanzenr. IV. 280 (Heft 79): 1057. 1922 [‘balcanum’]. – Lectotype (designated here): [Serbia, Stara Planina] “Hieracium Balkanicum [sic] Uechtr. in lit. / Cb fi01_195.gif 1878 / Zunächst verwandt mit H. rupicolum [sic] Fries / No 1 ad Uechtr.”, Pančić (BEOU [No. 11398]). – Fig. 4.

  • + Mk: F.Y.R. Makedonija: Šar Planina, Ljuboten, near source of Ljubotenska river, c. 1650 m, silicate, rock crevices, 21 Jun 2016, Niketić (BEO). – Described from silicate mountains in E Serbia and W Bulgaria under the name Hieracium balkanum (Pančić 1883). It is a new record for F.Y.R. Makedonija.

    We provide a proper citation of the protologue of the basionym, i.e. Glasn. Srpskog Učenog Društva 53: 206. 1883. Pančić's Elementa ad floram principatus Bulgariae is just a differently paginated offprint from this journal (with Hieracium balkanum on p. 46).

    Disagreement between the original and current classifications was mentioned by Niketic (2014). The combination Hieracium djimilense subsp. balkanum (Zahn 1922) was most probably based on material of H. djimilense misidentified as H. balkanum from the same localities as in the protologue of H. balkanum. This material was gathered and identified by “Pelivanović” and it seems that Zahn did not see the original material of Pančić. Our inspection of that material (designated here as the lectotype) together with our field investigations indisputably confirm the relation with H. schmidtii Tausch, and indeed Pančić (1883) had already stressed that connection: “Proximum H. Schmidtii Tausch...”.

    Š. Duraki & M. Niketić

Fig. 3.

Distribution map of Hieracium oroglaucum subsp. oroglaucum – black circle: locus classicus (Mt Korab); red circles: new localities.

f03_195.jpg

Hieracium sparsum subsp. squarrosobracchiatum O. Behr & al.

  • + Sr: Serbia: Šar Planina, Stojkova Kuća hut, c. 1300 m, silicate, rocky places in Pinus peuce Griseb. zone, 1 Oct 1991, Niketić (BEO); Karanikolica, c. 2350 m, silicate, rocky places above tree line, 22 Aug 2006, Niketić & Duraki (BEO); Konjuška, slopes toward Prevalac pass, c. 2490 m, silicate, screes and rocky places, 5 Aug 2015, Duraki (BEO). – Until now, Mt Korab was the only known locality of this taxon (Behr & al. 1937). We also found one population on Mt Jablanica in F.Y.R. Makedonija (near the Albanian border). Hieracium sparsum subsp. squarrosobracchiatum is very similar to H. sparsum subsp. naegelianiforme O. Behr & al., from which it is distinguished by its (almost) glabrous peduncles.

    Š. Duraki & M. Niketić

Fig. 4.

Hieracium schmidtii subsp. balkanum – Serbia: Stara Planina, Žarkova Čuka (7–8 km from type locality), 5 Jul 2014, photographs by M. Niketić.

f04_195.jpg

Hieracium stenoglossophyllum O. Behr & al. (≡ Hieracium oroglaucum subsp. stenoglossophyllum (O. Behr & al.) Greuter) – Fig. 5.

  • + Sr: Serbia: Sar Planina, Brod, Duška Reka Gorge, c. 1450 m, limestone, rocky places, 19 Jul 1988, Niketić & Stevanović (BEO); Ošljak, near summit, c. 2200 m, limestone, rocky places in Pinus mugo Turra zone, 21 Jul 1988, Niketić (BEO); Ošljak, Popovo Prase, c. 1900 m, limestone, rocky places in Pinus peuce Griseb. zone, 29 Sep 1991, Niketić (BEO); Prevalac pass to Jažinačko lake, c. 1400 m, silicate, rocky places in Pinus peuce zone, 29 Sep 1991, Niketić (BEO); Ošljak, Popovo Prase, 42°11′08.0″N, 20°58′07.5″E, 1935 m, limestone, rocky places above Pinus mugo, 17 Aug 2006, Lazarević & al. (BEO); Kobilica, above abandoned border fort, c. 1700 m, silicate, rocky places, 19 Aug 2006, Niketić & Duraki (BEO); Ošljak, Popovo Prase, c. 1900 m, limestone, rocky places in Pinus peuce zone, 30 Jul 2008, Niketić & Duraki (BEO); Crni Vrh, foothill, c. 1400 m, silicate, rocky pastures, 31 Jul 2008, Niketić & Duraki (BEO); Crni Vrh, right side of ridge toward Bevgrod peak, c. 2150 m, silicate and limestone, sparse shrub communities, 4 Aug 2014, Duraki (BEO); Crni Vrh, Drozga, c. 1950 m, silicate, stony blocks, 12 Aug 2014, Duraki (BEO); Crni Vrh, Drozga, c. 2100 m, limestone, sparse shrub communities, 31 Aug 2014, Duraki (BEO); Donji Jelovamik, c. 1570 m, silicate, clearing in Fagus forest, 1 Aug 2015, Duraki (BEO); Crni vrh, Bevgrod, c. 1870 m, silicate, rocky pastures and stony blocks in central part, 1 Aug 2015, Duraki (BEO); Gornji Jelovamik, behind Bevgrod, c. 1910 m, silicate, sparse Juniperus and Vaccinium communities, 1 Aug 2015, Duraki (BEO). – Like Hieracium oroglaucum O. Behr & al., this species was known only from Mt Korab (Behr & al. 1937), but it is also fairly common on Šar Planina. The origin of this species was interpreted by Behr & al. (1937) as “H. naegelianum–pseudobifidum (transylvanicum–bifidum)”.

    Š. Duraki & M. Niketić

Fig. 5.

Hieracium stenoglossophyllum – Serbia: Šar Planina, Ošljak, 30 Jul 2008, photographs by M. Niketić.

f05_195.jpg

Convolvulaceae

Convolvulus althaeoides subsp. tenuissimus (Sm.) Batt.

  • + Tn: Tunisia: Bizerte, Mateur, Souideya, 37°00′53″N, 09°38′09″E, 55 m, degraded stage of vegetation linked to thermophilous maquis of Olea europaea L. and Pistacia lentiscus L., 6 May 2015, El Mokni (herb. El Mokni). – Convolvulus althaeoides subsp. tenuissimus was not previously known from Tunisia (see, e.g., Le Floc′h & al. 2010; Dobignard & Chatelain 2010; APD 2018; Wood & al. 2015; Raab-Straube 2018+) until the extensive, apparently native population reported here was found in a clayey area on calcareous rocks between Mateur and Sidi Nsir. The plants occur in an area of c. 1000 m2 and seem actually not to be threatened by human activities or interspecific competition.

    R. El Mokni

Ipomoea indica (Burm.) Merr.

  • N Tn: Tunisia: Bizerte, Bizerte, E coast, 37°17′27″N, 09°52′15″E, 2 m, abandoned fields, 24 Dec 2016, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir); Monastir, Monastir, E coast, 35°45′01″N, 10°49′38″E, 2 m, abandoned lands, 12 Nov 2017, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir). – A xenophyte of American origin known to occur as a naturalized or casual alien in many countries around the Mediterranean with no mention so far for Tunisia (Raab-Straube 2018+; Le Floc′h & al. 2010; Dobignard & Chatelain 2011b; APD 2018). This is the first report for the Tunisian flora, with the status considered as naturalized as in neighbouring Algeria, Malta and Sicily.

    R. El Mokni

Crassulaceae

Sempervivum verereginae-amaliae Raus, nom. nov.Sempervivum reginae-amaliae Boiss., FI. Orient. Suppl.: 248. 1888, nom. illeg. [non Sempervivum reginae-amaliae Baker in Gard. Chron, ser. 2, 8 [No. 191]: 230. 1877. – Neotype designated here: [icon in] Rümpler & Schumann, Sukkulenten: 63, fig. 35. 1892] ≡ Sempervivum reginae-amaliae Halácsy, Consp. FI. Grace. 1: 580. 1901, isonym ≡ Sempervivum tectorum subsp. reginaeamaliae Maire & Petitm. in Bull. Soc. Sci. Nancy, ser. 3, 9: 234. 1908 ≡ Sempervivum marmoreum subsp. reginae-amaliae (Maire & Petitm.) Zonn. in Succulenta 78: 92. 1999. – Lectotype designated here (sec. Hagemann 1986: 339; Hart 2002: 311): Greece, Sterea Ellas: “In m[ontis] Parnassi reg[ione]. alpina, Aug[ustus]. 1855”, J. Guicciardi, De Heldreich Flora Graeca Exsiccata No. 2982 ( WU [No. 081444]).

Boissier (1872–1873: 796) initially did not validly publish the name Sempervivum reginae-amaliae because he merely cited it in synonymy (Turland & al. 2018: Art. 36.1(b)). However, validation of that name was effected by Boissier himself 15 years later when he, by mentioning diagnostic characters based on the exsiccatum “Guicciardi 2982” seen by him, discussed the possible conspecifity of S. reginae-amaliae Heldr. & Sartori ex Boiss. and S. tectorum L. (Boissier 1888: 248). However, Boissier's name was antedated by the heterotypic S. reginae-amaliae Baker (Baker 1877), which denotes a taxon in S. sect. Jovibarba DC. considered conspecific with S. heuffelii Schott (Hart & al. 2003: 342). As a consequence, the independent attempt by Halácsy (1901: 580) to validate the name S. reginae-amaliae for a species in S. sect. Sempervivum resulted in a later isonym with no nomenclatural status (Turland & al. 2018: Art. 6 Note 2). Maire & Petitmengin (1908: 234, under S. tectorum) were the first to validly publish a legitimate replacement name for S. reginae-amaliae Boiss. at subspecific rank (Turland & al. 2018: Art. 58.1). After 91 years, Zonneveld (1999: 92) transferred that subspecies to S. marmoreum Griseb., which replaces S. tectorum L. in Greece (Greuter & al. 1986: 31; Parnell & Favarger 1992: 428; Hart 2002: 313). Zonneveld (l.c.) published “Sempervivum marmoreum subsp. reginae-amaliae (Heldreich & Sartori ex Boissier 1872) Zonneveld”, providing a full and direct reference to Boissier (1872–1873), but not to the basionym, i.e. Maire & Petitmengin (1908), and citing three heterotypic synonyms with full references. According to Turland & al. (2018: Art. 41.8(c)), this is to be treated as a correctable error for the new combination S. marmoreum subsp. reginae-amaliae (Maire & Petitm.) Zonn.

The combination “Sempervivum marmoreum subsp. reginae-amaliae (Heldr. & Sartori ex Baker) Zonn.”, as currently (4 Jul 2018) recorded in the International Plant Names Index (IPNI 2012+), represents a synonym of S. heuffelii Schott (≡ Jovibarba heuffelii (Schott) A. Löve & D. Love; = S. reginae-amaliae Baker, non Boiss. nec Halácsy). This IPNI record is in fact erroneous in that it invokes Art. 41.8(c) of Turland & al. (2018), as described above, but treats the basionym as being S. reginae-amaliae Baker (1877), which is recorded in IPNI, rather than S. reginae-amaliae Boiss. (1888), which is not recorded in IPNI (only the earlier, not validly published designation of Boissier [1872–1873] is recorded there). This clearly contradicts the original intention of Zonneveld (1999: 87; Hart & al. 2003: 344), who definitely published a combination in Sempervivum L. s. str. (based on the illegitimate S. reginae-amaliae Boiss.) rather than in Jovibarba (DC.) Opiz (based on S. reginae-amaliae Baker). Baker simply obtained from an English private garden a living plant of S. heuffelii, in line with the times wrongly labelled “Sempervivum reginae-amaliae Heldr. et Sart.”, and referred to it under that name in a leading gardeners' newspaper together with an elaborate description, thus validly publishing the name S. reginae-amaliae as a mere synonym, from the present-day point of view, of S. (Jovibarba) heuffelii (Niederle 2015). Baker's herbarium and types are deposited in K and WELT (Stafleu & Cowan 1976: 104). However, Nikolić & al. (2014: 220) could not locate any herbarium material to serve as the nomenclatural type of S. reginae-amaliae Baker (≡ “Diopogon heuffelii var. reginae-amaliae (Baker) H. Jacobsen”, nom. inval. [Jacobsen 1970: 153, place of publication of basionym not cited] ≡ Jovibarba heuffelii var. reginae-amaliae (Baker) Müssel [Müssel 1977: 18]). From his protologue it seems that Baker merely based his description on a living plant that was seen by him “on a recent visit to Mr. Barr's”, who “had it in considerably quantity in a full state of development”, yet without substantiating the taxon with herbarium vouchers. Therefore, the illustration in Rümpler & Schumann (1892: 63, fig. 35, S. reginae-amaliae Heldr. & Sart.), the sole appropriate element from the account of S. heuffelii in Praeger (1932: 93), is selected here as the neotype of S. reginae-amaliae Baker. The drawing clearly exhibits the connivent petals of the few-petalled flowers characteristic of a member of S. sect. Jovibarba and is captioned “in Griechenland heimisch” [native to Greece] and “mit glockigen, an der Spitze gefranst-zerrissenen, dreispitzigen, gelblich-weißen Kronenblättern“ [with campanulate, apically lacerate-fringed, tricuspidate, yellowish-white petals]. This is concordant with Baker's protologue (Baker 1877) and a later description by the same author (Baker 1879: 428).

The replacement name in Sempervivum sect. Sempervivum, proposed here in allusion to Baker's usurpation of Guicciardi's royal dedicatee for the illegitimate S. reginaeamaliae Boiss. and its isonym S. reginae-amaliae Halácsy, is needed for taxonomists and Sempervivum breeders who, as advocated by Gowler & Tebbitt (2011), consistently apply specific rank to S. marmoreum subsp. ballsii (Wale) Zonn. (≡ S. ballsii Wale; see Greuter & al. 1986: 30), subsp. erythraeum (Velen.) Zonn. (≡ S. erythraeum Velen.; see Greuter & al. 1986: 30), subsp. marmoreum (S. marmoreum Griseb. s. str.) and subsp. reginae-amaliae (Maire & Petitm.) Zonn. (Wills & Wills 2000: 13, as “S. reginaeamaliae Heldr.”; Mitchell 1973: 22; Konop 1987: 154; Gowler & Tebbitt 2011: 87, as “S. reginae-amaliae Halácsy” ≡ S. verereginae-amaliae) alongside S. balcanicum Stoj. (Parnell & Favarger 1992: 427), S. kosaninii Praeger (Jalas & al. 1999: 60), S. leucanthum Pančić (Parnell & Favarger 1992: 426; Hart 2002: 310) and S. macedonicum Praeger (Greuter & al. 1986: 30; Parnell & Favarger 1992: 427; Jalas & al. 1999: 60). The alleged conspecifity of S. verereginae-amaliae and S. erythraeum, claimed in Marhold (2011c+), was refuted by Letz (2009: 294), who qualified the latter as taxonomically different and endemic to Bulgaria, hence absent from Greece, following Vălev (1970: 645–646), Petrova (2006: 94) and Assyov & Petrova (2006: 355).

Th. Raus

Cruciferae (Brassicaceae)

Brassica napus L.

  • N Tn: Tunisia: Bizerte, Bizerte city, 37°17′16″N, 09°52′12″E, 7 m, roadside vegetation, 3 Apr 2005, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Bizerte); ibid., Mateur to Michou, 37°03′36″N, 09°36′47″E, 14 m, roadside vegetation, 22 Apr 2006, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Bizerte); ibid., Menzel Bourguiba to Zaâora, 37°07′47″N, 09°46′14″E, 17 m, roadside vegetation, 26 Mar 2018, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir); ibid., Mateur to Ghezala, 37°05′09″N, 09°32′42″E, 25 m, 26 Mar 2018, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir). – The taxon is considered native to Scandinavia and Russia and is most commonly grown in N temperate regions. It is thought to have originated as a garden hybrid of Brassica oleracea var. capitata L. and B. rapa L. var. rapa and has been cultivated since the Middle Ages. In the Mediterranean area, the taxon is solely given for European Turkey and Anatolia as cultivated, but is not mentioned for N Africa (Marhold 2011b+). However, Dobignard & Chatelain (2011b) assigned it as “alien/adventitious” for Algeria, Libya, Morocco and also Tunisia. For Tunisia it has not yet been given as naturalized, neither by Pottier-Alapétite (1979), who reported it as “occasionally subspontaneous”, nor by Le Floc'h & al. (2010), who gave the status “alien/adventitious”. The actual status of B. napus in Tunisia is defined here. Many populations have been observed since 2005, and they have been occupying more and more space at least since 2006. Therefore, according to the definitions given by Pyšek & al. (2004), the species can be considered as naturalized in Tunisia.

    R. El Mokni

Euphorbiaceae

Mercurialis perennis L.

  • D Tn: Tunisia: Bizerte, Jarzouna, E coast, 37°16′00″N, 09°52′37″E, 1 m, abandoned fields, 30 Dec 2006, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Bizerte); ibid., Bizerte, E coast, 37°17′27″N, 09°52′15″E, 2 m, abandoned fields, 14 Jan 2017, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir). – The species is found native usually in the herb layer of forests from the Canary Islands throughout Europe eastwards to the Urals and N Iran, locally extending to N Africa, where it is so far reported only from Algeria (Hultén & Fries 1986: map 1280; Jefferson 2008). In view of the lack of previous records for the Tunisian flora (Euro+Med 2006+; Le Floc'h & al. 2010; Dobignard & Chatelain 2011b; APD 2018), these are the first records for the country, where Mercurialis perennis seems to have been overlooked or confused with the sympatric M. annua L. Both species are dioecious and may show a similar habit, but M. perennis has a branching rhizome system. The Tunisian records come from nitrophilous vegetation of abandoned fields, hence M. perennis is considered doubtfully native in Tunisia.

    R. El Mokni

Leguminosae (Fabaceae)

Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet

  • NTn: Tunisia: Jendouba, Fernan, 36°38′52″N, 08°41′52″E, 245 m, within deserted buildings, 25 Apr 2011, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Bizerte); Tunis, Bab Saâdoun, 36°48′36″N, 10°09′18″E, 16 m, within deserted buildings, 5 Mar 2018, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir); Monastir, Zaouiet Kontich, 35°39′10″N, 10°46′04″E, 30 m, roadsides, on cacti, 22 Apr 2018, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir); ibid., Masjed Aissa, 35°44′02″N, 10°43′34″E, 10 m, roadsides, on cacti, 22 Apr 2018, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir); ibid., Ouwardanine, 35°43′09″N, 10°39′17″E, 65 m, roadsides, on cacti, 22 Apr 2018, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir). – No previous records are known for Tunisia (ILDIS 2010; Le Floc'h & al. 2010; Dobignard & Chatelain 2012; APD 2018). The species, native to Africa S of the Sahara and now widely cultivated pan tropically, seems to have been introduced by human activities and then escaped from cultivation. A vigorously trailing, twining herbaceous plant, domesticated types are mostly summer-growing annuals or occasionally short-lived perennials. The wild ancestors are strongly perennial with stems robust, trailing to upright, 3–6 m long (Cook & al. 2005).

    R. El Mokni

Malvaceae (incl. Tiliaceae)

Corchorus olitorius L.

  • A Tn: Tunisia: Bizerte, Zouaouine, 37°07′59″N, 10°01′52″E, 95 m, agricultural fields, 26 Jul 2017, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir); Monastir, Jemmel, 35°37′05″N, 10°45′23″E, 30 m, roadsides, 7 Oct 2015, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir); Jendouba, Boussalem, 36°37′47″N, 08°55′12″E, 135 m, rodsides near agricultural fields, 2 Jul 2011, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir). – No previous records are known for Tunisia (Raab-Straube 2017b+; Le Floc'h & al. 2010; Dobignard & Chatelain 2012; APD 2018). The species, native to Pakistan and India, is now widespread throughout the world in tropical countries, extending to N Australia.

    R. El Mokni

Neuradaceae

Neurada al-eisawii Barsotti & al. (≡ N. procumbens var. al-eisawii (Barsotti & al.) Turki)

  • – Eg: Turki (2007) reported the finding of Neurada al-eisawii in Egypt and reduced it to the rank of variety under N. procumbens L. He supported this new taxonomic treatment on the basis of morphological features that were not taken into account in the original description of N. al-eisawii as a new species (Barsotti & al. 2000). Actually, the latter taxon differs from N. procumbens mainly in the morphology of the well-developed fruits, whereas the fruit illustrations provided by Turki reveal that what he thought to be N. al-eisawii was in fact attributable to the variability of N. procumbens var. procumbens. We therefore consider the finding of N. al-eisawii in Egypt to be erroneous and to be rejected. At the same time, we reaffirm the suitability of specific rank for N. aleisawii on the basis of the notable differences in fruit morphology from N. procumbens that were observed at the time of its first finding. Consequently, N. al-eisawii is here regarded as an exclusive endemic to the area of the Hisma Basin in S Jordan.

  • V. Lazzeri, A. Borzatti de Loewenstem &

    G. Barsotti

Nyctaginaceae

Mirabilis jalapa L.

  • N Tn: Tunisia: Bizerte, Bizerte city, 37°17′14″N, 09°52′10″E, 9 m, roadside vegetation, 13 May 2008, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Bizerte); Monastir, Lamta, 35°40′16″N, 10°52′12″E, 12 m, roadsides along non-permanent stream crossing olive groves, 22 Apr 2016, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir); ibid., Jemmel, 35°37′56″N, 10°46′28″E, 17 m, roadsides along non-permanent stream, 22 Apr 2016, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir); ibid., Téboulba, 35°38′19″N, 10°57′34″E, 25 m, roadsides near railway to city centre, 22 Apr 2016, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir); ibid., Touza, 35°37′51″N, 10°49′14″E, 35 m, meadows in olive groves, 22 Apr 2016, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir); Nabeul, 36°27′32″N, 10°44′49″E, 13 m, meadows in olive groves, 25 Jun 2017, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir). – A popular ornamental plant native to tropical America and cultivated worldwide for the beauty of its flowers, which can be white, red, pink, purple, yellow or multicolored; it is naturalized from cultivation (Grierson & Long 1984). For N Africa, the species is fisted by Uotila (2011+) only in Libya as a casual alien; however, it was assigned as cultivated (APD 2018) or cultivated/ subspontaneous for Algeria, Libya, Morocco and also Tunisia (Dobignard & Chatelain 2012). For Tunisia it has not previously been given as naturalized, and the actual status is defined here. Many populations have been observed since 2008, and they have been occupying more and more space mainly in C Tunisia; therefore, according to the definitions given by Pyšek & al. (2004), the species can be considered as naturalized in Tunisia.

    R. El Mokni

Orobanchaceae

Orobanche litorea Guss. (= O. fuliginosa Jord.; = O. sabulicola Lojac.) – Fig. 6.

  • + Lu: Portugal: Algarve, dunes near Carrapateira, on Plantago coronopus L. s.l. (matrix nova), very big population, 12 Apr 2015, Holzgreve (photo); ibid., Ribeira de Carrapateira, “Mündung bis Stausee”, 22 Apr 2015, Holzgreve (photo). – New for Portugal and the Iberian peninsula. This plant, described from Sicily without concrete locality (Gussone 1828: 184; see also Gussone 1844: 136) and lectotypified by Domina & Mazzola (2009: 179), is a typical element of Mediterranean coastal dunes. Almost all previously mentioned host plants are Asteraceae, and there is one record of Eryngium maritimum L. as a host (Domina & Arrigoni 2007: 122). The plants from the type gathering were parasitizing Anthemis maritima L. (Domina & Mazzola 2009: 179) and this is also the main host in the C Mediterranean. The parasitism of O. litorea on Plantaginaceae is new to science. Except for Sardinia and Sicily, the plant has very rarely been collected in other regions and countries. It has been recorded from France, Italy and Tunisia (France: Bouches-du-Rhône: Marseille; Var: Hyères, Île de Porquerolles; Alpes Maritimes: Cannes, île Sainte Marguerite; Jordan 1846: 226; Grenier 1853: 633; Gillet & Magne 1863: 301; Ardoino 1867: 290; Ardoino 1879: 292; Ollivier 1885: 16; Rouy 1909: 184; Bonnier 1926: 99, all as O. fuliginosa; Thorogood 2016: 462; Italy: Tuscany, Sardinia, Sicily; Nicotra 1878: 336; Lojacono Pojero 1882: 37; Caruel 1885: 388; Béguinot 1902: 484; Lojacono Pojero 1904: 165; Fiori 1925–1929: 390; Beck von Mannagetta 1930: 217, as O. fuliginosa; Domina & Arrigoni 2007: 122; Domina & al. 2011: 219ff.; D'Antraccoli & al. 2016: 77; Thorogood 2016: 462; Tunisia: El Mokni & al. 2015a: 6ff.). Other reports require confirmation (often published under different names; Bertoloni 1845–1847; Caruel 1860; Pellegrini 1942; Fossi Innamorati 1989; Foggi & al. 2001; all quoted in D'Antraccoli & al. 2016: 77); likewise generally all reports from the E Mediterranean require confirmation, i.e. Crete (see the note in El Mokni & al. 2015a: 8) and other regions in Greece and Turkey (Greuter & al. 1989: 257, as O. fuliginosa in a wide sense). We cannot assign all the reports of O. fuliginosa in Dimopoulos & al. (2013: 118) to O. litorea; because the latter is a strictly coastal species, the reports of O. fuliginosa from inland localities presumably belong to a different taxon.

    Orobanche litorea has been photographically documented by C. Thorogood from the Algarve, but without a correct specific determination ( https://www.flickr.com/photos/23743086@N02/2403237438, as O. amethystea on Hieracium sp.; Thorogood 2014, as “Orobanche sp. parasitizing Plantago coronopus” with note: “populations of a fourth cryptic taxon occur locally on dunes and coastal shales on the western sea belt of the Algarve which are parasitic on Plantago coronopus. This taxon […] appears to be closely related to O. amethystaea […] and also O. litorea”). The reports in Foley (2001: 59, Cabo de São Vicente, as O. maritima Pugsley) and Greuter & al. (1989: 261, “Lu, Hs”, as O. maritima) possibly also belong here.

    Orobanche litorea is evidently poorly known and has often been misidentified or erroneously put in synonymy. Beck von Mannagetta (1930: 181) included it in O. canescens C. Presl, a species morphologically related to O. pubescens d'Urv., which has a different habit and, among other features, long glandular hairs on the outer side of the corolla (see also Domina & Štepánek 2009). In Pignatti (1982: 612) and Greuter & al. (1989: 261), O. litorea is treated as a synonym of O. minor Sm., which has shorter flowers and usually a lax inflorescence, but shares with O. litorea the character of always very short glandular hairs on the outer side of the corolla. There is also little resemblance of O. litorea with species like O. amethystea Thuill. and O. chironii Lojac., with which it is often synonymized or confused.

    Orobanche litorea is not conspecific with O. maritima Pugsley, described 1940 from England (Cornwall, Devon, Dorset, Kent) and the Channel Islands (Guernsey and Jersey) and parasitizing Daucus L. (holotype: BM000582370). Orobanche maritima lives in dunes as well, with Plantago coronopus s.l. reported as one of the host plants (Pugsley 1940: 110; Stace 2010: 663). Those plants have a habit similar to O. minor, with a lax inflorescence and shorter flowers.

    Orobanche angelicifixa Péteaux & St.-Lag. 1890 [≡ O. fuliginosa f. angelicifixa (Péteaux & St.-Lag.) Beck 1930], described from a garden in Lyon with the host Angelica L., has a different habit (Péteaux & Saint-Lager 1890: 221 ff. with drawings) and is not conspecific with O. litorea. The location of O. angelicifixa – far inland and anthropogenic – and Gagnepain's successful cultivation experiments (e.g. on Trifolium L.; Gagnepain 1945: 258; Gagnepain 1949: 182) strongly suggest a close relationship with O. minor.

    On the other hand, especially with regard to the corolla shape, the flower size and the frequent development of strong stigma lobes, there are clear affinities to the members of Orobanche subsect. Speciosae (Lojac.) Novopokr., O. crenata Forssk. and O. owerini (Beck) Beck. However, O. litorea is also distinguished from those species by the typically compact inflorescence (the drawing in Thorogood [2016: 462] is not typical for the species).

    Plants from the Algarve (Fig. 6A, B) match very well with historical collections (e.g. the lectotype of O. litorea: PAL43213; see Domina & Mazzola 2009: 179, 180, fig. 1; and “Orobanche sabulicola n. sp.”, Lojacono, K000759358) and plants from Sicily (on Anthemis maritima, root attachment verified, Mar 2016, Kreinsen & Rätzel, herb. Rätzel; Fig. 6C, D).

    S. Rätzel, V. Holzgreve,

    B. Kreinsen & H. Uhlich

Fig. 6.

Orobanche litorea – A: habit of plants with host Plantago coronopus s.l.; B: infloresence detail; A, B: Portugal: Algarve, dunes near Carrapateira, 12 Apr 2015, photographs by V. Holzgreve. – C: habit of plant with host Anthemis maritima (bottom left); D: infloresence detail; C, D: Italy, Sicily: coastal dunes near Portopalo, 14 Mar 2016, photographs by B. Kreinsen & S. Rätzel.

f06_195.jpg

Orobanche reticulata subsp. agigensis Rätzel & Uhlich

  • + Tu(A): Turkey: B5 Kayseri, mountain Erciyes, 15 km from Hisarcik to Develi, 38°30′42″N, 35°29′58″E, 2100–2200 m, steppe, 14 Jul 2009, Zare 490 & al. (HUB); ibid., 2 km S of Tekir lake, 38°29′52″N, 35°30′59″E, steppe, 27 Jun 2010, Zare 600 & Bayrak (HUB); ibid., Develi to Kayseri, 8 km before (S of) Tekir lake, 27 Jun 2010, Zare 606 & Bayrak (HUB). – These records, published by Zare & Dönmez (2013), are the first certain ones of Orobanche reticulata Wallr. for Turkey. Apart from that, there is only one uncertain indication of the species from the Bursa region in W Turkey (Gilli 1982; Zare & Dönmez 2013). The collections from the region of Kayseri in C Anatolia match O. reticulata subsp. agigensis, recently described from the Thač massif in the Russian W Greater Caucasus (Rätzel & Uhlich 2016). This taxon can be determined in the field especially by the obligate yellow stigmas. It is probably a plant of higher altitudinal ranges in S W Asia that has its own area separate from O. reticulata subsp. reticulata.

    S. Rätzel & H. Uhlich

Phelipanche gussoneana (Lojac.) Domina, RaabStraube, Rätzel & Uhlich, comb. nov. ≡ Phelypaea gussoneana Lojac. in Naturalista Sicil. 1: 199. 1882. – Lectotype (designated by Domina & Mazzola 2007: 230): “Phelipaea n. sp. / rufescens Gris. / opp. caesia / ad radices Rumex / tuberosa / sotto Busambra / 13 Jun 1878” (PAL 43009). – Fig. 7.

= Phelipanche schultzioides M. J. Y. Foley in Bot. Chron. (Patras) 19: 7. 2008 ≡ Orobanche schultzioides (M. J. Y. Foley) Domina in Willdenowia 39:331. 2010. – Holotype: Greece, Peloponnisos, Zarouchla, roadside N of the village, 13 Jun 2005, Foley 2115 (E; isotype: E).

  • + Si(S): Italy, Sicily: Busambra (Palermo), on Rumex tuberosus L., 13 Jun 1878, Lojacono (PAL 43009); ibid., on Rumex nebroides Campd., 28 Jun 2004, Domina (PAL); ibid., on Arabis alpina subsp. caucásica (Willd.) Briq., 20 Jun 2004, Domina (PAL); ibid., on Hyoseris radiata L., 28 Jun 2004, Domina (PAL); ibid., on Geranium rotundifolium L., 28 Jun 2004, Domina (PAL); ibid., on Centaurea cyanus L. and Anthemis cupaniana Nyman, 28 Jun 2004, Domina (PAL); ibid., on Rumex triangularis DC., Jun 1878, Lojacono (P); ibid., Lojacono 44 (PRC); ibid., on Rumex nebroides, Jun 1881, Lojacono (FI); Palermo, Lojacono 7 (PRC); Madonie (Palermo), Jun 1853, [A. Todaro] (PAL); Madonie, on Artemisia camphorata Vill, Gussone (NAP); Madonie [Isnello], c.da Rianello, on Artemisia camphorata [= A. alba Turra], Palumbo (herb. Miná).

  • + Rf(CS): Russia, N Greater Caucasus: Krasnodarskiy Kray, Anapskiy Rayon, near Anapa, valley of river Sukko, 5–7 km above Sukko village, on Lamium maculatum (L.) L., root attachment verified, host det. Tatanov, 7 Jun 1989, Dolmatova & al. 1637 (LE01042372); ibid., near Anapa, c. 4 km S of Malyy Utrish, 27 May 2014, Dugorova, as Orobanche purpurea Jacq. (MW1004073, MW1003793); ibid., c. 1.2 km E of Malyy Utrish, 44.708116°N, 37.476416°E, Carpinus wood, 29 May 2013, Kozhin Kr-1594, as O. dalmatica (Beck) Tzvelev (MW0637999); ibid., c. 1.2 km E of Malyy Utrish, 44.70883°N, 37.4768°E, Carpinus wood, 29 May 2016, Kozhin Kr-1610, as O. dalmatica (MW0723903).

  • + Ab(A): Azerbaijan: Talysh, Lerik rayon, “Caucasus – auf Wiesen in der Umgegend von Tatuni. Jul.”, without year, without collector [Hohenacker?], as Phelypaea coerulea var. comosa (LE01015390 [i.e. plant on left of sheet annotated with “a.” and “II.”]).

    Phelipanche gussoneana, including Phelipanche schultzioides described from Peloponnisos, Greece (Foley 2008), has probably been overlooked in the C and E Mediterranean, and was recently also found on the Crimean peninsula (Rätzel & al. 2017a, 2017b). Phelipcnche schultzioides, including its type, and specimens from Sicily identified as Phelipanche oxyloba (Reut.) Soják (Domina & al. 2011) match Phelypaea gussoneana, including its type. For reasons of nomenclatural priority, the present new combination is necessary when Phelipanche schultzioides and Phelypaea gussoneana are regarded as conspecific. This taxon is typically taller than the morphologically similar Phelipanche mutelii (F. W. Schultz) Pomel and has a different appearance, with bracts sticking out from the inflorescence in bud, and dark bluish veins on the corolla.

    S. Rätzel, G. Domina, E. von Raab-Straube,

    I. V. Tatanov & H. Uhlich

Fig. 7

Phelipanche gussoneana – A: habit of plant; B: inflorescence detail. – Italy, Sicily: Palermo, Rocca Busambra (type locality of Phelypaea gussoneana), 20 Jun 2014, photographs by G. Domina.

f07_195.jpg

Phelipanche kelleri (Novopokr.) Soják (≡ Orobanche kelleri Novopokr.) – Fig. 8.

  • + Gg(G): Georgia: Greater Caucasus, Mzcheta-Mtianeti, near Karsani, Sarkinetis Kedi, 41.835519°N, 44.714053°E, 640 m, S-exposed slope, stony, open sunny site, collected together with fragment of host [Bassia prostrata (L.) Beck], 11 May 2017, Gröger & Shewardnadze 2206 (M); ibid., Caucasus, Gouv. Tiflis, 14 Jun 1889, Lipský (LE).

  • + Tu(A): Turkey: Ankara, Şlereflikoçhisar, 12 May 2013, Tonsun, as Orobanche sp. (photo [ http://dogalhayat.org/property/Orobanche-10/]).

    Phelipanche kelleri, described from Kazakhstan (Novopokrovskij 1950: 319, holotype: LE00050173), is a rarely collected and illustrated species. It was previously known from Armenia (Tzvelev & Cherepanov 728 & 818, LE; Yegorova & al. 2101, LE; Zaturyan & Grigoryan 1987: 375; Terekhin & al. 1993: 115), Azerbaijan (Karyagin & Safiew, LE; Yegorova & al. 483, LE; Tzvelev 1957: 568; Terekhin & al. 1993: 115), Russia (Tzvelev 1981: 328), Kazakhstan (Novopokrovskij 1950: 319; Orazova 1965: 156; Terekhin & Filimonova 1993: 52) and W China (Zhang 1988: 398; Zhang 1990: 105; Zhang & Tzvelev 1998: 233; Tzvelev 2006: 17). Reports from Ukraine (e.g. Tzvelev 1981: 328) and Kurdistan territories (e.g. Novopokrovskij & Tzvelev 1958: 57; Kabulov 1978: 15) require confirmation. Here the species is reported for the first time from Georgia and Turkey. It is morphologically well characterized by the strongly keeled corolla and its often bulged edges, the completely glabrous inner surface of the corolla and its whitish (especially in the lower half) to bright violet-blue colour.

    Parasitism on Chenopodiaceae is unusual in the genus Phelipanche. Only the W Mediterranean P. camphorosmae Carlón & al. is known to parasitize Camphorosma monspeliaca L. So far, only Bassia prostrata has been mentioned as a host plant for P. kelleri (Tzvelev 2015). The presumed host (root attachment not verified) for the plant from Georgia (Sarkinetis Kedi) is also B. prostrata. Though bearing neither flowers nor fruits, the latter could be identified by its unmistakable leaf anatomy (Freitag & Kadereit 2014: fig. 3F).

    S. Rätzel, H. Freitag & H. Uhlich

Fig. 8.

Phelipanche kelleri – A: habit in late flowering and early fruiting stage; B: detail, upper part of inflorescence. – Georgia: Sarkinetis Kedi, 11 May 2017, photographs by A. Gröger.

f08_195.jpg

Phelipanche orientalis (Beck) Soják (≡ Orobanche orientalis Beck). – Fig. 9.

  • + AE(G): Greece, E Aegean Islands: Rodos, c. 2.7 km ESE of Agios Isidoros, 36°09′42.9″N, 27°52′41.4″E (WGS 84), c. 540 m, edge of old cultivated land, top of small hill, open and sunny, parasitic on shrubs of Prunus webbii (Spach) Vierh. (matrix nova), many plants, all under solitary shrubs (but not outside them), 26 May 2014, Krause & al. (herb. Rätzel, B). – New to Greece (not recorded in Dimopoulos & al. 2013, 2016). Phelipanche orientalis, described from the NW Himalaya (Beck von Mannagetta 1890: 110f., t. 1, fig. 19; 1930: 90), is a poorly known and rarely illustrated species (holotype: K; isotype: LE [not found, fide Novopokrovskij & Tzvelev 1958: 65]; syntype: Pakistan, K000061351 [as Phelypaea aegyptiaca (Pers.) Walp.]; syntypes: India, M-0185499, M-0185500, P02982291, P02982293 [as Phelypaea aegyptiaca]). There are also records from Cyprus (Meikle 1985: 1237; Heller & Heyn 1987: 70; Greuter & al. 1989: 261; Viney 1994: 500; Hand & al. 2011+,  http://www.flora-of-cyprus.eu/cdm_dataportal/taxon/5bf50fa5-b80c-4772-af52-d0cfa723f583, Turkey (P02968071 [as Phelypaea ramosa (L.) C. A. Mey.]; Greuter & al. 1989: 261), Azerbaijan (Tzvelev 1957: 572; Novopokrovskij & Tzvelev 1958: 65), NW Iran (Bornmüller 1910: 158; Beck von Mannagetta 1930: 90; Schiman-Czeika 1964: 9; Heller & Heyn 1987: 70), Armenia (Novopokrovskij & Tzvelev 1958: 65; Zaturjan & Grigorjan 1987: 377), Iraq (Al-Mayah & Al-Asadi 2017: 6), Uzbekistan (Zakirov 1961: 356; Terekhin & Filimonova 1993: 53), Tajikistan (Zakirov 1961: 356; Yunusov 1986: 448; Terekhin & Filimonova 1993: 53), Afghanistan (Beck von Mannagetta 1890: 111; 1930: 90) and Pakistan (Boissier 1879: 498, as Phelypaea lavandulacea (Rchb.) Reut.; Stewart 1972: 673; Athar & al. 2007: 348). Further records from Syria, Israel, Palestinian territories, Egypt, Jordan, Oman and China require confirmation.

    The almost verified hosts for this species are Rosaceae, especially shrubby species of Prunus sect. Amygdalus (L.) Benth. & Hook, f., e.g. P. bucharica B. Fedtsch. (Yunusov 1986: 448), P. fenzliana Fritsch (Tzvelev 1957: 572; Novopokrovskij & Tzvelev 1958: 65) and P. spinosissima Franch. (Yunusov 1986: 448). Meikle (1985: 1237) gave as host for the plants from Cyprus “Prunus dulcis, Medicago spec., Astragalus lusitanicus, etc.” Phelipanche orientalis can also be very abundant in plantations of Prunus armeniaca L. (apricot), e.g. in Turkey, prov. Malatya, 2013, Aksoy & Pekcan, as Phelipanche aegyptiaca (Pers.) Pomel (photo [Aksoy & Pekcan 2014: 31]). The species probably occurs also on other members of Prunus sect. Amygdalus, but has been misidentified (Schiman-Czeika 1964: 1 ff.; Musselmann 1980: 463ff.; Riches & Parker 1995: 226ff.; Saeidi Mehrvarz & al. 2010: 113; Sánchez Pedraja & al. 2016+).

    Phelipanche orientalis is characterized by its slender growth, erect branches (if present), slender tubular and erecto-patent corolla, and long and acute corolla lobes, often with few coarse teeth. Beck von Mannagetta (1890: 110) referred to the more or less high connection of the bracteoles with the calyx tube. This feature is characteristic, but is not continuous within a population or even on the same plant and is not therefore fully suitable for differentiation from other species. Phelipanche orientalis differs from the taller and mostly unbranched P. schultzii (Mutel) Pomel by the much shorter calyx lobes. In contrast to P. mutelii (F. W. Schultz) Pomel [including var. nana (Reut.) Uhlich & Rätzel and var. oxyloba (Reut.) Rätzel & Uhlich] and P. ramosa (L.) Pomel, the bracts are not appressed to the buds, but are fairly developed and spreading (see Rätzel & al. 2017b). This character is similar in P. gussoneana (Lojac.) Domina & al. (= P. schultzioides M. J. Y. Foley, see notula above); both species have a distinct tuft-like appearance of the top of the spike. Phelipanche orientalis is very variable in size, but normally significantly larger than P. mutelii s.l.

    Phelipanche orientalis may be conspecific with Phelipanche libanotica (Boiss.) Soják, described from Ainhata and Bscherre, Lebanon as Phelypaea libanotica Boiss. (Boissier 1888: 357). The structure of the flower and the habit of the two taxa are similar. Phelipanche libanotica was also indicated from Mt Makmel, Lebanon, and from near Alexandria, Egypt (Beck von Mannagetta 1930: 92, as Orobanche schultzii var. alexandrina Beck). The material of those last two records was most probably destroyed in B in 1943, and no other original material is known. The holotype of Phelypaea libanotica (Schweinfurth 453, GOO 150062) is rather scanty, consisting of three separate flowers and drawings of habit and flowers, and the host is not known either. Two other sheets determined by Sánchez Pedraja & al. (2016+) as Phelipanche libanotica probably also belong to Phelipanche orientalis: “In Libani borealis declivitatibus orientalibus silvaticis, inter Der-el-Ahmar et Aineta”, 1600–1700 m, 27–28 Jun 1910, J. & F. Bornmüller 12240, as O. schultzii Mutel (P02968070); “Syrie, champs au S. de Rachaya”, 1250 m, 6 May 1926, A. Berton 139, as O. mutelii F. W. Schultz (P02968675).

    S. Rätzel, M. Ristow & H. Uhlich

Fig. 9.

Phelipanche orientalis – A: habit of plants, B: inflorescence detail. – Greece: Rodos, near Agios Isidoros, 26 May 2014, photographs by S. Rätzel.

f09_195.jpg

Polygonaceae

Polygonum argyrocoleon Kunze

  • N Tn: Tunisia: Béja, 36°44′49″N, 09°12′27″E, 150 m, cultivated fields and meadows, 1 Jul 2015, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir). – A naturalized alien, originating from the Irano-Turanian region, new to the flora of Tunisia. For N Africa, it was previously reported as native from Morocco, Algeria and Libya with no mention for Tunisia (Uotila 2017+; Le Floc'h & al. 2010; Dobignard & Chatelain 2013; APD 2018). A large population was detected in Tunisia growing in cultivated fields, while other plants were observed in meadows along the Béja river. The species seems to have been previously confused in Tunisia with P. patulum M. Bieb. due to a similar habit. Its almost leafless floral branches are conspicuously different from the leafy branches in P. patulum.

    R. El Mokni

Solanaceae

Solanum rostratum Dunal

  • A Tn: Tunisia: Sousse, Bouficha, 36°11′46″N, 10°25′41″E, 13 m, cultivated fields and along roadsides, 7 Apr 2015, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir). – A casual alien new to the flora of Tunisia. Solanum rostratum is considered native to Mexico and the Great Plains region of the United States (Whalen 1979) and is now widely naturalized and invasive in tropical and subtropical regions around the world (Randall 2012; USDA-NRCS 2018). For N Africa, it has been reported so far only as a casual alien in Morocco, with no mention for Tunisia (Valdés 2012+; Le Floc'h & al. 2010; Dobignard & Chatelain 2013; APD 2018).

    R. El Mokni

Acknowledgements

Stefan Rätzel and Holger Uhlich wish to thank G. Zare for information about her finds of Orobanche reticulata from Turkey, A. Gröger for providing the photographs of Phelipanche kelleri, A. Fleischmann for permission to study specimens of P. kelleri at M, and J. Hunnex (BM) for providing the scan of O. maritima. Thomas Raus gratefully acknowledges Urs Eggli (Zürich), Ralf Hand (Berlin), Nicholas Turland (Berlin) and Robert Vogt (Berlin) for nomenclatural advice and supply of helpful literature and online sources conducive to the conclusions presented here. Two anonymous reviewers are thanked for their comments on earlier versions of these notulae.

References

1.

Aguiar F. C., Ferreira M. T., Moreira I. 2001: Exotic and native vegetation establishment following channelization of a western Iberian river. –  Regulat. Rivers Res. Managem. 17: 509–526. Google Scholar

2.

Aksoy E. & Pekcan V. 2014: Canavar otlari (Orobanche spp., Phelipanche spp.) ve mücadelesi. – Ankara: T. C. Gıda, Tarim ve Hayvancılık Bakanlığı. Google Scholar

3.

Al-Mayah A. A. & Al-Asadi W. M. 2017: Two new records of the genus Phelipanche (Orobanchaceae) from Iraq. –  Global J. Biol. Agric. Health Sci. 6: 4–7. Google Scholar

4.

APD 2018: African Plant Database (version 3.4.0). Canna indica L., Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don, Convolvulus althaeoides subsp. tenuissimus (Sm.) Batt, Corchorus olitorius L., Dipcadi fulvum (Cav.) Webb & Berthe!., Ipomoea indica (Burm.) Merr., Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet, Lonicera japonica Thunb., Mercurialis perennis L., Mirabilis jalapa L., Polygonum argyrocoleon Steud, ex Kunze, Solanum rostratum Dunal, Spirodela polyrrhiza (L.) Schleid., Tradescantia fluminensis Vell., Tradescantia pallida (Rose) D. R. Hunt, Vinca difformis Pourr., Vinca major L., Vinca minor L., Wolffia arrhiza (L.) Horkel ex Wimm. – Genève: Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques; Pretoria: South African National Biodiversity Institute. – Published at  http://www.ville-ge.ch/musinfo/bd/cjb/africa/ [accessed 25 May 2018]. Google Scholar

5.

Ardoino H. J. B. 1867: Flore analytique du département des Alpes-Maritimes. – Menton: J. V. Ardoin. Google Scholar

6.

Ardoino H. J. B. 1879: Flore analytique du département des Alpes-Maritimes, ed. 2. – Menton: Bertrand & Queyrot; Nice: S. Cauvin-Empereur. Google Scholar

7.

Assyov B. & Petrova A. (ed.) 2006: Conspectus of the Bulgarian vascular flora. Distribution maps and floristic elements, ed. 3. – Sofia: Bulgarian Biodiversity Foundation. Google Scholar

8.

Athar M., Chaudhary A. H., Yousaf Z. & Shabbir S. M. 2007: Taxonomic reflections on the parasitic angiosperms of Pakistan. – Phytologia 89: 339–348. Google Scholar

9.

Baker J. G. 1877: New garden plants. – Gard. Chron., ser. 2, 8 [No. 191]: 230. Google Scholar

10.

Baker J. G. 1879: A synopsis of the hardy cultivated sempervivums (continued). – Gard. Chron., ser. 2 , 12 [No. 301]: 428–429. Google Scholar

11.

Bao B.-J., Clemants S. E. & Borsch Th. 2003: Achyranthes Linnaeus. – Pp. 424–425 in: Wu Z.-Y., Raven P. H. & Hong D.-Y. (ed.), Flora of China 5. Ulmaceae through Basellaceae. – Beijing: Science Press; St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press. Google Scholar

12.

Barreto R. C. 1997: Levantamento das espécies de Commelinaceae R. Br. nativas do Brasil. – São Paulo: PhD thesis, Universidade de São Paulo. Google Scholar

13.

Barsotti G., Borzatti de Loewenstem A. & Garbari F. 2000: Neurada al-eisawii (Neuradaceae), a new species from the southern desert of Jordan. – Bot. Chron. (Patras) 13: 111–115. Google Scholar

14.

Beck von Mannagetta G. 1890: Monographie der Gattung Orobanche. – Cassel: Theodor Fischer. [= Biblioth. Bot. 19]. Google Scholar

15.

Beck von Mannagetta G. 1930: Orobanchaceae. – In: Engler A. (ed.), Das Pflanzenreich. Regni vegetabilis conspectus IV. 261 (Heft 96). – Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann. Google Scholar

16.

Béguinot A. 1902: Orobanchaceae. – Pp. 470–486 in: Fiori A. & Paoletti G. (ed.), Flora analitica d'Italia 2. – Padova: Tipografia del Seminario. Google Scholar

17.

Behr O., Behr E. & Zahn K. H. 1937: Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Hieracien von Südserbien. – Glasn. Skopsk. Naučn. Društva 6, Odeljenje prirodnih nauka 18: 51–67. Google Scholar

18.

Behr O., Behr E. & Zahn K. H. 1939: Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Hieracien von Südserbien. – Glasn. Skopsk. Naučn. Društva 7, Odeljenje prirodnih nauka 20: 23–34. Google Scholar

19.

Bertoloni A. 1845–1847: Flora italica 6. – Bononiae: Haeredum Richardi Masii. Google Scholar

20.

Boissier P. E. 1872–1873: Flora orientalis 2. – Genève, Bâle & Lyon: H. Georg. Google Scholar

21.

Boissier P. E. 1875–1879: Flora orientalis 4 [pp. 1–280 (1875); pp. 281–1276 (1879)]. – Genève, Bâle & Lyon: H. Georg. Google Scholar

22.

Boissier P. E. [ Buser R. (ed.)]: 1888: Flora orientalis. Supplementum. – Genève, Bâle & Lyon: H. Georg. Google Scholar

23.

Bonnet E. & Barratte G. 1896: Exploration scientifique de la Tunisie. Catalogue raisonne des plantes vasculaires de la Tunisie. – Paris: Imprimerie Nationale. Google Scholar

24.

Bonnier G. 1926: Flore complète illustrée en coleurs de France, Suisse et Belgique 8. – Paris: E. Orlhac; Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé; Bruxelles: J. Lebègue & Cie. Google Scholar

25.

Bornmüller J. 1910: Bearbeitung der von J. A. Knapp im nordwestlichen Persien gesammelten Pflanzen. – Verh. Zool.-Bot. Ges. Wien 60: 61–194. Google Scholar

26.

Caruel T. 1860: Prodromo della flora Toscana. – Firenze: Felice Lemonnier. Google Scholar

27.

Caruel T. 1885: Orobanchaceae : – Pp. 345–389 in: Pariatore F. (ed.), Flora italiana 6. Corolliflore. Parte Seconda. – Firenze: Le Monnier. Google Scholar

28.

Clapham A. R., Tutin T. G. & Warburg E. F. 1962: Flora of the British Isles. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

29.

Cook B. G., Pengelly B. C., Brown S. D., Donnelly J. L., Eagles D. A., Franco M. A., Hanson J., Mullen B. F., Partridge I. J., Peters M. & Schultze-Kraft R. 2005: Tropical forages: an interactive selection tool. – Brisbane: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) etc. – Published at  http://www.tropicalforages.info/key/forages/Media/Html/entities/lablab_purpureus.htm [accessed 26 May 2018], Google Scholar

30.

D'Antraccoli M., Bertacchi A., Roma-Marzio F. & Domina G. 2016: 482. Orobanche litorea. – P. 77 in: Peruzzi L., Viciani D., Agostini N., Angiolini C., Ardenghi N. M. G., Astuti G., Bardaro M. R., Bertacchi A., Bonari G., Boni S., Chytrý M., Ciampolini F., D'Antraccoli M., Domina G., Feretti G., Guiggi A., Iamonico D., Laghi P., Lastrucc L., Lazzaro L., Lazzeri V., Liguori P., Mannocci M., Marsiaj G., Novák P., Nucci P., Pierini B., Roma-Marzio F., Romiti B., Sani A., Zoccola A., Zukal D. & Bedini G., Contributi per una flora vascolare di Toscana. VIII (440–506). – Atti Soc. Tosc. Sci. Nat. Pisa Mem., ser. B, 123: 71–82. Google Scholar

31.

Davis P. H. (ed.) 1978: Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands 6. – Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar

32.

Dimopoulos P., Raus Th., Bergmeier E., Constantinidis Th., Iatrou G., Kokkini S., Strid A. & Tzanoudakis D. 2013: Vascular plants of Greece. An annotated checklist. – Berlin: Botanic Garden and Botanical Museum Berlin-Dahlem; Athens: Hellenic Botanical Society. – Engiera 31. Google Scholar

33.

Dimopoulos P., Raus Th., Bergmeier E., Constantinidis Th., Iatrou G., Kokkini S., Strid A. & Tzanoudakis D. 2016: Vascular plants of Greece. An annotated checklist. Supplement. –  Willdenowia 46: 301–347. Google Scholar

34.

Dobignard A. & Chatelain C. 2010: Index synonymique de la flore d'Afrique du Nord 1. Pteridophyta, Gymnospermae, Monocotyledonae. – Genève: Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques. Google Scholar

35.

Dobignard A. & Chatelain C. 2011a: Index synonymique de la flore d'Afrique du Nord 2. Dicotyledoneae, Acanthaceae à Asteraceae. – Genève: Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques. Google Scholar

36.

Dobignard A. & Chatelain C. 2011b: Index synonymique de la flore d'Afrique du Nord 3. Dicotyledoneae, Balsaminaceae à Euphorbiaceae. – Genève: Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques. Google Scholar

37.

Dobignard A. & Chatelain C. 2012: Index synonymique de la flore d'Afrique du Nord 4. Dicotyledoneae: Fabaceae-Nymphaeaceae. – Genève: Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques. Google Scholar

38.

Dobignard A. & Chatelain C. 2013: Index synonymique de la flore d'Afrique du Nord 5. Dicotyledoneae: Oleaceae–Zygophyllaceae. – Genève: Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques. Google Scholar

39.

Domina G. 2010 [“2009”]: Orobanchaceae. – P. 331 in: Greuter W. & Raab-Straube E. von (ed.), Euro+Med Notulae, 4 [Notulae ad floram euro-mediterraneam pertinentes No. 26]. –  Willdenowia 39: 327–333. Google Scholar

40.

Domina G. & Arrigoni P. V. 2007: The genus Orobanche (Orobanchaceae) in Sardinia. – Fl. Medit. 17: 115–136. Google Scholar

41.

Domina G., Marino P. & Castellano G. 2011: The genus Orobanche (Orobanchaceae) in Sicily. – Fl. Medit. 21: 205–242. Google Scholar

42.

Domina G. & Mazzola P. 2007: The genus Orobanche in Sicily. Taxa described by V. Tineo and M. Lojacono Pojero. – Bocconea 21: 223–232. Google Scholar

43.

Domina G. & Mazzola P. 2009: Notes on the genus Orobanche in Italy: 2. Taxa described by Gussone. – Bocconea 23: 177–185. Google Scholar

44.

Domina G. & Štepánek J. 2009: Typification of the name Orobanche canescens C. Presl (Orobanchaceae) with taxonomic notes. – Candollea 64: 31–37. Google Scholar

45.

Dunphy M. 1991: Rainforest weeds of the big scrub. – Pp. 85–93 in: Phillips S. (ed.), Rainforest remnants. Proceedings of a workshop on rainforest rehabilitation. – Sydney: NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service. Google Scholar

46.

El Mokni R. & Domina G. 2017: Chamaemelum nobile (L.) All. – P. 297 in: Raab-Straube E. von & Raus Th. (ed.), Euro+Med-Checklist Notulae, 8 [Notulae ad floram euro-mediterraneam pertinentes No. 37]. –  Willdenowia 47: 293–309. Google Scholar

47.

El Mokni R., Domina G., Sebei H. & El Aouni M. H. 2014: Hyacinthoides kroumiriensis sp. nov. (Hyacinthaceae): a new species from north west of Tunisia. – Int. J. Advanced Res. 2: 640–644. Google Scholar

48.

El Mokni R., Domina G., Sebei H. & El Aouni M. H. 2015a: Taxonomic notes and distribution of taxa of Orobanche gr. minor (Orobanchaceae) from Tunisia. –  Acta Bot. Gallica Bot. Lett. 162: 5–10. Google Scholar

49.

El Mokni R., Domina G., Sebei H. & El Aouni M. H. 2015b. On the distribution and subspecific variation of the Tunisian-Algerian endemic Delphinium sylvaticum Pomel (Ranunculaceae). –  Nordic J. Bot. 33: 548–554. Google Scholar

50.

El Mokni R., Elaissi A. & El Aouni M. H. 2016: Cuscuta campestris (Cuscutaceae) une holoparasite nouvelle et envahissante pour la flore de Tunisie. – Fl. Medit. 26: 179–189. Google Scholar

51.

El Mokni R. & Iamonico D. 2017: Alcea setosa (Boiss.) Alef. – Pp. 299–300 in: Raab-Straube E. von & Raus Th. (ed.), Euro+Med-Checklist Notulae, 8 [Notulae ad floram euro-mediterraneam pertinentes No. 37]. –  Willdenowia 47: 293–309. Google Scholar

52.

El Mokni R., Kasri M. & El Aouni M. H. 2013: Volkameria inermis (Lamiaceae) a new alien species naturalized to the Tunisian coast, first record for North-Africa. – El. Medit. 23: 117–122. Google Scholar

53.

El Mokni R., Sebei H. & El Aouni M. H. 2015c: Rediscovery of a rare North African endemic Odontites (Orobanchaceae): first record and variability from Tunisia. – Int. J. Advanced Res. 3: 376–382. Google Scholar

54.

El Mokni R. & Véla E. 2017: Crepis bursifolia L. – Pp. 297–298 in: Raab-Straube E. von & Raus Th. (ed.), Euro+Med-Checklist Notulae, 8 [Notulae ad floram euro-mediterraneam pertinentes No. 37]. –  Willdenowia 47: 293–309. Google Scholar

55.

El Mokni R. & Verloove F. 2017: Ehrharta calycina Sm. – Pp. 299 in: Raab-Straube E. von & Raus Th. (ed.), Euro+Med-Checklist Notulae, 8 [Notulae ad floram euro-mediterraneam pertinentes No. 37]. –  Willdenowia 47: 293–309. Google Scholar

56.

Enomoto T. 2000: Weeds of Japan. – Okayama: Laboratory of Wild Plant Science, The Research Institute for Bioresources, Okayama University. Google Scholar

57.

Euro+Med 2006+ [continuously updated]: Euro+Med PlantBase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. – Published at  http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed [accessed 24 May 2018]. Google Scholar

58.

Fiori A. 1925–1929: Nuova flora analitica d'Italia 2. – Firenze: M. Ricci. Google Scholar

59.

Foggi B., Grigioni A. & Luzzi P. 2001: La flora vascolare dell'Isola di Capraia (Arcipelago Toscano): aggiornamento, aspetti fitogeografici e di conservazione. – Parlatorea 5: 5–53. Google Scholar

60.

Foley M. J. Y. 2001: Orobanche. – Pp. 32–72 in: Castroviejo S. & al. (ed.), Flora iberica. Plantas vasculares de la Península e Islas Baleares 14. Myoporaceae-Campanulaceae. – Madrid: Real Jardín Botánico, C.S.I.C. Google Scholar

61.

Foley M. J. Y. 2008: Phelipanche schultzioides (Orobanchaceae), a new species from Peloponnesos, Greece. – Bot. Chron. (Patras) 19: 5–12. Google Scholar

62.

Fossi Innamorati T. 1989: La flora vascolare dell'Isola d'Elba (Arcipelago Toscano). Parte seconda. –  Webbia 43: 201–267. Google Scholar

63.

Freitag H. & Kadereit G. 2014: C3 and C4 leaf anatomy types in Camphorosmeae (Camphorosmoideae, Chenopodiaceae). –  P1. Syst. Evol. 300: 665–687. Google Scholar

64.

Gagnepain F. 1945: Orobanche angelicifixa Pet. et St-Lag. –  Bull. Soc. Bot. France 92: 258–259. Google Scholar

65.

Gagnepain F. 1949: Orobanche angelicifixa (2e note). –  Bull. Soc. Bot. France 96: 182. Google Scholar

66.

Gillet M. & Magne M. J.-H. 1863: Nouvelle flore française. – Paris: Gamier. Google Scholar

67.

Gilli A. 1982: Orobanchaceae L. – Pp. 1–23 in: Davis P. H. (ed.), Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands 7. – Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar

68.

GISD 2015: Global Invasive Species Database. Species profile: Canna indica. – Published at  http://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/species.php?sc=640 [accessed 24 May 2018]. Google Scholar

69.

Gleason H. A. & Cronquist A. 1963: Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. – New York: New York Botanic Garden. Google Scholar

70.

Govaerts R. 2012: World checklist of Commelinaceae. – Richmond: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. – Published at  http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/ [accessed 20 May 2018]. Google Scholar

71.

Gowler Z. R. & Tebbitt M. C. 2011: Sempervivum Linnaeus. – Pp. 83–90 in: Cullen J., Knees S. G. & Cubey H. S. (ed.), The European garden flora. Flowering plants. A manual for the identification of plants cultivated in Europe, both out-of-doors and under glass 3. Angiospermae–Dicotyledons. Ed. 2. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

72.

Grenier M. 1853: Orobanche. – In: Grenier M. & Godron M. (ed.), Flore de France ou description des plantes qui croissent naturellement en France et en Corse 2(2). – Paris: J. B. Baillière; London: H. Baillière; Besançon: Sainte-Agathe Fils. Google Scholar

73.

Greuter W. 2006+ [continuously updated]: Compositae (pro parte majore). – In: Greuter W. & Raab-Straube E. von (ed.): Compositae. Euro+Med PlantBase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. – Published at  http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/PTaxonDetail.asp?NameId=14103&PTRefFk=7000000 [accessed 13 May 2018]. Google Scholar

74.

Greuter W., Burdet H. M. & Long G. 1984: Med-Checklist. A critical inventory of vascular plants of the circummediterranean countries 1. Pteridophyta (ed. 2), Gymnospermae, Dicotyledones (Acanthaceae-Cneoraceae). – Genève: Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques; Berlin: Secrétariat Med-Checklist, Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin-Dahlem. Google Scholar

75.

Greuter W., Burdet H. M. & Long G. 1986: Med-Checklist. A critical inventory of vascular plants of the circum-mediterranean countries 3. Dicotyledones (Convolvulaceae – Labiatae). – Genève: Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques; Berlin: Secrétariat Med-Checklist, Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin-Dahlem. Google Scholar

76.

Greuter W., Burdet H. M. & Long G. 1989: Med-Checklist. A critical inventory of vascular plants of the circum-mediterranean countries 4. Dicotyledones (Lauraceae – Rhamnaceae). – Genève: Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques; Berlin: Secrétariat Med-Checklist, Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin-Dahlem. Google Scholar

77.

Greuter W. & Domina G. 2015: Checklist of the vascular plants collected during the 12th “Iter Mediterraneum” in Tunisia, 24 March – 4 April 2014. – Bocconea 27: 21–61. Google Scholar

78.

Greuter W. & Raab-Straube E. von (ed.) 2005: Euro+Med Notulae, 1 [Notulae ad floram euro-mediterraneam pertinentes No. 16]. –  Willdenowia 35: 223–239. Google Scholar

79.

Grierson A. C. J. & Long D. G. 1984: Flora of Bhutan. – Edinburgh: Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh. Google Scholar

80.

Gussone G. 1828: Florae siculae prodromus sive plantarum in Sicilia ulteriori nascentium enumeratio secundum systema Linneanum disposita 2. – Napoli: Ex regia typographia. Google Scholar

81.

Gussone G. 1844: Florae siculae synopsis exhibens plantas vasculares in Sicilia insulisque adjacentibus huc usque detectas, secundum systema Linneanum disposita 2(1). – Napoli: Tramater. Google Scholar

82.

Hagemann I. 1986: Sempervivum L. – Pp. 337–340 in: Strid A. (ed.), Mountain flora of Greece 1. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

83.

Halácsy E. von 1901: Conspectus florae Graecae 1. – Lipsiae: G. Engelmann. Google Scholar

84.

Hand R., Hadjikyriakou G. N. & Christodoulou C. S. (ed.) 2011+ [continuously updated]: Flora of Cyprus – a dynamic checklist. – Published at  http://flora-of-cyprus.eu/ [accessed 14 Apr 2018]. Google Scholar

85.

Hart H. 't 2002: Sempervivum L. – Pp. 309–313 in: Strid A. & Tan K. (ed.), Flora hellenica 2. – Ruggell: A. R. G. Gantner. Google Scholar

86.

Hart H. 't, Bleij B. & Zonneveld B. 2003: Sempervivum. – Pp. 332–349 in: Eggli U. (ed.), Illustrated hand-book of succulent plants: Crassulaceae. – Berlin, Heidelberg & New York: Springer. Google Scholar

87.

Heller D. & Heyn C. C. 1987: Conspectus florae orientalis. An annotated catalogue of the flora of the Middle East. 4. – Jerusalem: Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities. Google Scholar

88.

Hickman J. C. (ed.) 1993: The Jepson manual: higher plants of California. – Berkeley: University of California. Google Scholar

89.

Howell J. T., Raven P. H. & Rubtzoff P. 1958: Flora of San Francisco. – Wasmann J. Biol. 16: 1–155. Google Scholar

90.

Hultén E. & Fries M. 1986: Atlas of north European vascular plants north of the Tropic of Cancer 2. – Königstein: Koeltz Scientific Books. Google Scholar

91.

Iamonico D. 2014a: Lectotypification of Linnaean names in the genus Amaranthus L. (Amaranthaceae). –  Taxon 63: 146–150. Google Scholar

92.

Iamonico D. 2014b: Lectotypification of Linnaean names in the genus Achyranthes L. (Amaranthaceae). –  Taxon 63: 405–407. Google Scholar

93.

Iamonico D. 2015a: Taxonomic revision of the genus Amaranthus (Amaranthaceae) in Italy. –  Phytotaxa 199: 1–84. Google Scholar

94.

Iamonico D. 2015b+ [continuously updated]: Achyranthes aspera L. – In: Euro+Med PlantBase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. – Published at  http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/PTaxonDetail.asp?NameId=879&PTRefFk=7300000 [accessed 6 Mar 2018]. Google Scholar

95.

Iamonico D. 2017: Achyranthes L. – Pp. 232–233 in: Pignatti S. (ed.), Flora d'Italia, ed. 2, 2. – Bologna: Edagricole. Google Scholar

96.

Iamonico D. & El Mokni R. 2017: Amaranthus palmeri, a second record for Africa and notes on A. sonoriensis nom. nov. –  Bothalia 47(1): a2100. Google Scholar

97.

Iamonico D. & El Mokni R. 2018: Amaranthus tunetanus (Amaranthaceae), a new species from Tunisia and a diagnostic key to the North African taxa in subgen. Albersia. –  S. African J. Bot. 114: 78–83. Google Scholar

98.

Iamonico D. & Jarvis C. E. 2012: Lectotypification of two Linnaean names in Chenopodium L. (Amaranthaceae). —  Taxon 61: 864–865. Google Scholar

99.

Iamonico D. & Sánchez Del Pino I. 2014: Lectotypification of the Linnaean name Gomphrena vermicularis L. (Amaranthaceae). —  Taxon 63: 403–404. Google Scholar

100.

Iamonico D. & Sánchez Del Pino I. 2016: Taxonomic revision of the genus Alternanthera (Amaranthaceae) in Italy. —  P1. Biosystems 150: 333–342. Google Scholar

101.

ILDIS 2010: International Legume Database & Information Service of plants in the family Fabaceae (Leguminosae). — Published at  http://www.ildis.org/Leguminosae/[accessed 19 May 2018]. Google Scholar

102.

IPNI 2012+ [continuously updated] : The International Plant Names Index. — Published at  http://www.ipni.org [accessed 22 Mar and 4 Jul 2018]. Google Scholar

103.

Jacobsen H. 1970: Das Sukkulentenlexikon. Kurze Beschreibung, Herkunftsangaben und Synonymie der sukkulenten Pflanzen mit Ausnahme der Cactaceae. … Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer. Google Scholar

104.

Jalas J., Suominen J., Lampinen R. & Kurtto A. (ed.) 1999: Atlas florae europaeae 12. Resedaceae to Platanaceae. — Helsinki: The Committee for Mapping the Flora of Europe & Societas Biologica Fennica Vanamo. Google Scholar

105.

Jefferson R. G. 2008: Biological flora of the British Isles: Mercurialis perennis L. —  J. Ecol. 96: 386–412. Google Scholar

106.

Jordan A. 1846: Observations sur plusier plantes nouvelles rares ou critiques de la France 3. — Paris: Maison; Leipzig: T. O. Weigel. Google Scholar

107.

Kabulov D. T. 1978: Zarazikhovye srednej azii. — Tashkent: “FAN” Uzbekskoj SSR. Google Scholar

108.

Kelly D. & Skipworth J. P. 1984: Tradescantia fluminensis in a Manawatu (New Zealand) forest: I. Growth and effects on regeneration. —  New Zealand J. Bot. 22: 393–397. Google Scholar

109.

Konop R. 1987: Netresky. Rody Sempervivum a Jovibarba. — Praha: Český záhradkárský svaz. Google Scholar

110.

Korotkova N. & Raab-Straube E. von 2017+ [continuously updated]: Cactaceae. — In: Euro+Med PlantBase — the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. — Published at  http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/PTaxonDetail.asp?NameId=94373&PTRefFk=7500000 [accessed 20 May 2018]. Google Scholar

111.

Le Floc'h E. & Boulos L. 2008: Flore de Tunisie: catalogue synonymique commenté. — Montpellier: self-publ. Google Scholar

112.

Le Floc'h E., Boulos L. & Véla E. 2010: Catalogue synonymique commenté de la flore de Tunisie. — Tunis: Ministère de l'Environnement et du Développement durable. Google Scholar

113.

Lee K. J., Jo J. C., Lee B. S. & Lee D. S. 1990: The structure of plant community in Kwangnung (Korea) forest (I): analysis of the forest community of Soribong area by the classification and ordination techniques. — J. Korean Forestry Soc. 79: 173–186. Google Scholar

114.

Letz D. R. 2009: A new species of the Sempervivum marmoreum group in Central Europe. —  Preslia 81: 293–308. Google Scholar

115.

Lojacono Pojero M. 1881–1882: Criterii sui caratteri delle Orobanche. — Naturalista Sicil. 1: [No. 2] 45–48, [No. 3] 53–56, [No. 4] 90–93, [No. 5] 131–136, [No. 7] 162–165, [No. 8] 169–75, [No. 9] 199–203, [No. 10] 209–216, [No. 12] 255–258, t. VI, VIII, IX. Google Scholar

116.

Lojacono Pojero M. 1904: Flora sicula o descrizione delle piante vascolari spontanee o indigenate in Sicilia 2(2). CorollifloraeMonochlamydeaeGymnospermae. — Palermo: L. Pedone-Lauriel di Carlo Clausen. Google Scholar

117.

Maire R. & Petitmengin M. 1908: Étude des plantes vasculaires récoltées en Grèce (1906). Materiaux pour servir à l'étude de la flore et de la géographie botanique de l'orient (Missions du ministère de l'instruction publique en 1904 et en 1906). Quatrième fascicule. — Bull. Soc. Sci. Nancy, ser. 3, 9: 151–266; [suite et fin] 360–481 [& separate reprint, pp. 3–239. — Nancy: Imprimerie Berger-Levrault & Co.]. Google Scholar

118.

Marhold K. 2011a+ [continuously updated]: Apocynaceae. — In: Euro+Med PlantBase — the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. — Published at  http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/PTaxonDetail.asp?NameId=2561&PTRefFk=7200000 [accessed 24 May 2018]. Google Scholar

119.

Marhold K. 2011b+ [continuously updated] : Brassicaceae. — In: Euro+Med PlantBase — the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. — Published at  http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/PTaxonDetail.asp?NameId=14691&PTRefFk=7200000 [accessed 21 May 2018]. Google Scholar

120.

Marhold K. 2011c+ [continuously updated] : Crassulaceae. — In: Euro+Med PlantBase — the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. — Published at  http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/PTaxonDetail.asp?NameId=18091&PTRefFk=7200000 [accessed 20 May 2018]. Google Scholar

121.

Meikle R. D. 1985: Flora of Cyprus 2. — Kew: Bentham Moxon Trust, Royal Botanic Gardens. Google Scholar

122.

Mitchell P. J. 1973: The Sempervivum & Jovibarba handbook. — Burgess Hill: The Sempervivum Society. Google Scholar

123.

Müssel H. 1977: Sempervivum und Jovibarba: Versuch einer systematischen Darstellung. — Institut für Stauden, Gehölze und angewandte Pflanzensoziologie, Freising: Peter Weiz. Google Scholar

124.

Musselman L. J. 1980: The biology of Striga, Orobanche, and other root-parasitic weeds. —  Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 18: 463–489. Google Scholar

125.

Nicotra L. 1878: Prodromus florae messanensis plantas exhibens phanerogamas sponte virentes juxta methodum naturalem digestas. — Messanæ: Ribera. Google Scholar

126.

Niederle J. 2015: Sempervivum reginae-amaliae. — Skalničkárův rok 71: 28–29. Google Scholar

127.

Niketić M. 2014: Nomenclature review of the plants published by Josif Pančić (Nomenclator Pancicianus novus). — Bot. Serbica 38: 209–236. Google Scholar

128.

Nikolić D., Kuzmanović N., Walter J., Lakušić D., Randelović V. & Letz R. 2014: Lectotypification of some names in the Jovibarba heuffelii group (Crassulaceae). —  Phytotaxa 174: 206–222. Google Scholar

129.

Novopokrovskij I. V. 1950: Generis Orobanche L. species novae ex URSS. — Bot. Mater. Gerb. Bot. Inst. Komarova Akad. Nauk SSSR 13: 303–329. Google Scholar

130.

Novopokrovskij I. V. & Tzvelev N. N. 1958: Orobanchaceae. — Pp. 19–117, 685–687 in: Komarov V. A. (ed.), Flora SSSR 23. — Moscow & Leningrad: Akademii Nauk SSSR. Google Scholar

131.

Ollivier L. 1885: Catalogue de la flore de l'île de Porquerolles. Plantes vasculaires. — Marseille: J. Cayer. Google Scholar

132.

Orazova A. 1965: Orobanchaceae. — Pp. 150–168 in: Pavlov N. V. (ed.), Flora kazakhstana 8. — Alma-Ata: Nauka. Google Scholar

133.

Orlando A. & Grisafi F. 1977: Appunti per la flora esotica d' Italia. — Inform. Bot. Ital. 9: 113–114. Google Scholar

134.

Pančić J. 1883: Grada za floru kneževine Bugarske [= Elementa ad floram principatus Bulgariae]. — Glasn. Srpskog Učenog Društva 53: 161–231. Google Scholar

135.

Parnell P. & Favarger L. 1992: Sempervivum L. — Pp. 232–239 in: Tutin T. G., Burges N. A., Chater O. A., Edmondson J. R., Heywood V. H., Moore D. M., Valentine D. H., Walters S. M. & Webb D. A. 1993: Flora europaea 1. Psilotaceae to Platanaceae. Ed. 2. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

136.

Pellegrini P. 1942: Flora della provincia di Apuania. – Apuania-Massa: E. Medici. Google Scholar

137.

Péteaux J. C. J. & Saint-Lager J. B. 1890: Orobanche angelicifixa. — Ann. Soc. Bot. Lyon 27: 221–223. Google Scholar

138.

Petrova A. (ed.) 2006: Atlas of Bulgarian endemic plants. — Sofia: Gea-Libris. Google Scholar

139.

Pignatti S. 1982: Flora d' Italia 2. — Bologna: Edagricole. Google Scholar

140.

Pinkava D. J. 2003: Opuntia Miller. — Pp. 123–148 in: Flora of North America Editorial Committee (ed.), Flora of North America north of Mexico 4. Magnoliophyta: Caryophyllidae, part 1. — New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar

141.

Pottier-Alapetite G. 1979: Flore de la Tunisie. Angiospermes — Dicotylédones. Dialypétales. — Tunis: Ministère de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche Scientifique & Ministère de l'Agriculture. Google Scholar

142.

Praeger R. L. 1932: An account of the Sempervivum group. — London: The Royal Horticultural Society. Google Scholar

143.

Pugsley H. W. 1940: Notes on Orobanche L. — J. Bot. 78: 105–116. Google Scholar

144.

Pyšek P., Richardson D. M., Rejmánek M., Webster G. L., Williamson M. & Kirschner J. 2004: Alien plants in checklists and floras: towards better communication between taxonomists and ecologists. —  Taxon 53: 131–143. Google Scholar

145.

Raab-Straube E. von 2017a+ [continuously updated] : Caprifoliaceae. — In: Euro+Med PlantBase — the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. — Published at  http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/PTaxonDetail.asp?NameId=15390&PTRefFk=7500000 [accessed 19 May 2018]. Google Scholar

146.

Raab-Straube E. von 2017b+ [continuously updated]: Corchorus L. — In: Euro+Med PlantBase — the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. — Published at  http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/PTaxonDetail.asp?NameId=34662&PTRefFk=7100000 [accessed 19 May 2018]. Google Scholar

147.

Raab-Straube E. von 2018+ [continuously updated] : Convolvulaceae. — In: Euro+Med PlantBase — the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. — Published at  http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/PTaxonDetail.asp?NameId=18971&PTRefFk=7400000 [accessed 12 Apr 2018]. Google Scholar

148.

Raab-Straube E. von & Raus Th. (ed.) 2017: Euro+Med-Checklist Notulae, 8 [Notulae ad floram euro-mediterraneam pertinentes No. 37]. —  Willdenowia 47: 293–309. Google Scholar

149.

Randall R. P. 2012: A global compendium of weeds. — Perth: Department of Agriculture and Food. — Published at  http://www.cabi.org/isc/FullTextPDF/2013/20133109119.pdf [accessed 20 May 2018]. Google Scholar

150.

Rätzel S., Fateryga A. V. & Uhlich H. 2017a: Phelipanche schultzioides M. J. Y. Foley. — Pp. 302–303 in: Raab-Straube E. von & Raus Th. (ed.), Euro+Med-Checklist Notulae, 8 [Notulae ad floram euro-mediterraneam pertinentes No. 37]. —  Willdenowia 47: 293–309. Google Scholar

151.

Rätzel S., Ristow M. & Uhlich H. 2017b: Bemerkungen zu ausgewählten Vertretern der Gattung Phelipanche Pomel im östlichen Mittelmeergebiet mit der Beschreibung von Phelipanche hedypnoidis Rätzel, Ristow & Uhlich, sp. nov. — Carinthia II 127: 643–684. Google Scholar

152.

Rätzel S. & Uhlich H. 2016: Orobanche reticulata subsp. agigensis Rätzel & Uhlich subsp. nov. — Pp. 430–432 in: Raab-Straube E. von & Raus Th. (ed.), Euro+Med-Checklist Notulae, 6 [Notulae ad floram euro-mediterraneam pertinentes No. 35]. —  Willdenowia 46: 423–442. Google Scholar

153.

Riches C. R. & Parker C. 1995: Parasitic plants as weeds. — Pp. 226–255 in: Press M. C. & Graves J. D. (ed.), Parasitic plants. — London: Chapman & Hall. Google Scholar

154.

Robertson K. R. 2003: Achyranthes L. — Pp. 435–437 in: Flora of North America Editorial Committee (ed.), Flora of North America north of Mexico 4. — New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar

155.

Rouy G. 1909: Flore de France ou description des plantes qui croissant spontanement en France, en Corse et en Alsace-Lorraine 11. — Paris: È. Deyrolle Fils. Google Scholar

156.

Rümpler Th. & Schumann K. 1892: Die Sukkulenten (Fettpflanzen und Kakteen). Beschreibung, Abbildung und Kultur derselben. — Berlin: Paul Parey. Google Scholar

157.

Saeidi Mehrvarz S., Torabi A. & Aghabeigi F. 2010: Notes on the genus Orobanche (Orobanchaceae) in Iran. — Iran. J. Bot. 16: 107–113. Google Scholar

158.

Sánchez Pedraja O., Moreno Moral G., Garlón L., Piwowarczyk R., Lainz M. & Schneeweiss G. M. 2016+ [continuously updated] : Index of Oroban- chaceae. — Published at  http://www.farmalierganes.com/Otrospdf/publica/Orobanchaceae%20Index.htm [accessed 14 Apr 2018]. Google Scholar

159.

Schiman-Czeika H. 1964: Orobanchaceae. — In: Rechinger K. H. (ed.), Flora Iranica 5. — Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt. Google Scholar

160.

Stace C. 2010: New flora of the British Isles, ed. 3. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

161.

Stafleu F. A. & Cowan R. S. 1976: Taxonomic literature. A selective guide to botanical publications and collections with dates, commentaries and types, ed. 2, 1: A–G. — Utrecht: Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema. [=  Regnum. Veg. 94]. Google Scholar

162.

Stewart R. R. 1972: An annotated catalogue of the vascular plants of West Pakistan and Kashmir. — In: Nasir E. & Ali S. I. (ed.), Flora of West Pakistan. — Karachi: Fakhri. Google Scholar

163.

Sukhorukov A. P., Martin-Bravo S., Verloove F., Maroyi A., Iamonico D., Catarino L., El Mokni R., Daniel T. F., Belyaeva I. V. & Kushunina M. 2016: Chorological and taxonomic notes on African plants. —  Acta Bot. Gallica Bot. Lett. 163: 417–428. Google Scholar

164.

Teofilovski A. 2014: Reports 213–239. — In: Vladimirov V., Dane F., Matevski V. & Tan K. (ed.), New floristic records in the Balkans: 25. — Phytol. Balcan. 20: 295–301. Google Scholar

165.

Terekhin E. S. & Filimonova S. N. 1993: Orobanchaceae. — Pp. 46–63 in: Vvedenskij A. I. (ed.), Opredelitel' rastenij Srednej Azii. Kriticheskij konspekt flory. Conspectus florae asiae mediae. 10. – Tashkent: “FAN” Respubliki Uzbekistan. Google Scholar

166.

Terekhin E. S., Shibakina G. B., Serafimovich N. B. & Kravtsova T. I. 1993: Opredelitel' Zarazykhovykh flory SSSR. — Sankt Petersburg: Nauka. Google Scholar

167.

Thorogood C. 2014: Parasitic plants in the Algarve region of southern Portugal. — Haustorium, Parasitic Pl. Newslett. 65: 3–4. Google Scholar

168.

Thorogood C. 2016: Field guide to the wild flowers of the western Mediterranean. — Kew: Kew Publishing. Google Scholar

169.

Tison J.-M. 2010: Allium litardierei J.-M. Tison, nom. et stat. nov. — P. 403 in: Dobignard A. & Chatelain C., Index synonymique de la flore d'Afrique du Nord 1. Pteridophyta, Gymnospermae, Monocotyledoneae. — Genève: Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève. Google Scholar

170.

Tolkach V. F., Chuyan A. Kh., Krylov A. V. 1990: Characterization of a Poty virus isolated from Trade scantia albiflora in a southern locality of the Soviet Far East. — Bull. Glavnogo Bot. Sada, 157: 76–80. Google Scholar

171.

Tropicos 2018+ [continuously updated]: Achyranthes aspera L. — Tropicos.org, Missouri Botanical Garden. — Published at  http://www.tropicos.org/Name/1100001?tab=subordinatetaxa [accessed 14 Mar 2018]. Google Scholar

172.

Turki Z. A. 2007: Neuradaceae J. G. Agardh in Egypt. — Fl. Medit. 17: 137–142. Google Scholar

173.

Turland N. J., Wiersema J. H., Barrie F. R., Greuter W., Hawksworth D. L., Herendeen P. S., Knapp S., Kusber W.-H., Li D.-Z. , Marhold K., May T. W., McNeill J., Monro A. M., Prado J., Price M. J. & Smith G. F. (ed.) 2018: International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Shenzhen Code) adopted by the Nineteenth International Botanical Congress Shenzhen, China, July 2017. — Glashütten: Koeltz Botanical Books. [=  Regnum Veg. 159]. Google Scholar

174.

Tzvelev N. N. 1957: Orobanchaceae. — Pp. 550–593 in: Karyagin I. I. (ed.), Flora Azerbaidzhana 7. — Baku: Akademia Nauk Azerbaidzhanskoj SSR. Google Scholar

175.

Tzvelev N. N. 1981: Orobanchaceae. — Pp. 317–336 in: Fedorov A. A. (ed.), Flora Evropejskoj Chasti SSSR 5. — Leningrad: Nauka, Leningradskoe Otdelenie. Google Scholar

176.

Tzvelev N. N. 2006: Orobanchaceae. — Pp. 11–23 in: Borodina-Grabovskaya A. E., Grubov V. I., Illarionova I. D., Krestovskaya T. V. & Tzvelev N. N. 2006: Rasteniya Central'noy Azii. 15. — Moskva: Tovariščestvo Naučnich Isdanii KMK. Google Scholar

177.

Tzvelev N. N. 2015: O rode Sarasikha (Orobanche L. sensu lato, Orobanchaceae) v Rossii. — Novosti Sist. Vyssh. Rast. 46: 189–215. Google Scholar

178.

Uotila P. 2009+ [continuously updated] : Lemnaceae. – In: Euro+Med PlantBase — the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. — Published at  http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/PTaxonDetail.asp?NameId=95590&PTRefFk=7300000 [accessed 19 Apr 2018]. Google Scholar

179.

Uotila P. 2011+ [continuously updated] : Nyctaginaceae. — In: Euro+Med PlantBase — the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. — Published at  http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/PTaxonDetail.asp?NameId=95426&PTRefFk=7300000 [accessed 23 May 2018]. Google Scholar

180.

Uotila P. 2017+ [continuously updated]: Polygonaceae. — In: Euro+Med PlantBase — the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. — Published at  http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/PTaxonDetail.asp?NameId=27790&PTRefFk=7300000 [accessed 21 May 2018]. Google Scholar

181.

USDA-ARS 2018: Germplasm Resources Information Network [GRIN]. — Beltsville: United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. — Published at  https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomysearch.aspx [accessed 20 May 2018]. Google Scholar

182.

USDA-NRCS 2018: The PLANTS Database. — Greensboro: National Plant Data Team. — Published at  http://plants.usda.gov [accessed 20 May 2018]. Google Scholar

183.

Valdés B. 2012+ [continuously updated]: Solanaceae. — In: Euro+Med PlantBase — the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. — Published at  http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/PTaxonDetail.asp?NameId=100493&PTRefFk=7100000 [accessed 22 May 2018]. Google Scholar

184.

Vălev S. 1970: Sempervivum L. — Pp. 644–649 in: Jordanov D. & Kožuharov S. (ed.), Flora na Narodna Republika Bălgaria 4. — Sofia: Izdatelstvo na Bălgarskata Akademija na Naukite. Google Scholar

185.

Véla E. & Mostari A. 2013: Sur la présence de Dipcadi serotinum subsp. fulvum (Cav.) Webb & Berth. en Algérie. — Lagascalia 33: 331–336. Google Scholar

186.

Viney D. E. 1994: An illustrated flora of North Cyprus. - Königstein: Koeltz Scientific Books. Google Scholar

187.

Webb P. B. & Berthelot S. 1842–1850: Histoire naturelle des Iles Canaries 3,2(2). Phytographia canariensis. — Paris: Béthune. Google Scholar

188.

Whalen M. D. 1979: Speciation in Solanum, section Androceras. — Pp. 581–596 in: Hawkes J. G., Lester R. N., Nee M. & Estrada R. N. (ed.), Solanaceae III: taxonomy, chemistry, evolution. — Richmond: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Google Scholar

189.

Wills H. & Wills S. 2000: Houseleeks. Sempervivum, Jovibarba, Rosularia. — Torrington: Fernwood Nursery. Google Scholar

190.

Wood J. R. I., Wilhams B. R. M., Mitchell T. C., Carine M. A., Harris D. J. & Scotland R. W. 2015: A foundation monograph of Convolvulus L. (Convolvulaceae). —  PhytoKeys 51: 1–282. Google Scholar

191.

Wunderlin R. P. 1998: Guide to the vascular plants of Florida. — Gainesville: University Press of Florida. Google Scholar

192.

Wunderlin R. P. & Hansen B. F. 2003: Atlas of Florida vascular plants. — Tampa: Institute for Systematic Biology, University of South Florida. — Published at  http://www.plantatlas.usf.edu/ [accessed 20 May 2018]. Google Scholar

193.

Yannitsaros A. 2006: Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don. — P. 720 in: Greuter W. & Raus Th. (ed.), Med-Checklist Notulae, 24. —  Willdenowia 36: 719–730. Google Scholar

194.

Yunusov S. Y. 1986: Orobanchaceae. — Pp. 436–459 in: Ovczinnikov P. N. (ed.), Flora Tadzhikskoj SSR 8. — Leningrad: Nauka, Leningradskoe Otdelenie. Google Scholar

195.

Zahn K. H. 1922: Compositae—Hieracium. Sect. XVI. Tridentata (Fortsetzung und Schluß) bis Sect. XXXIX. Mandonia. — In: Engler A. (ed.), Das Pflanzenreich IV. 280 (Heft 79). — Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann. Google Scholar

196.

Zahn K. H. 1939: Hieracium. 3. — In: Ascherson P. & Graebner P. (ed.), Synopsis der mitteleuropäischen Flora 12(3). — Leipzig: Gebrüder Borntraeger. Google Scholar

197.

Zakirov K. Z. 1961: Flora i rastitel'nost' bassejna reki Zeravshan 2. — Tashkent: Akademia Nauk Uzbekskoj SSR. Google Scholar

198.

Zare G. & Dönmez A. A. 2013: Two new records of the genus Orobanche (Orobanchaceae) from Turkey. — Turk. J. Bot. 37: 597–603. Google Scholar

199.

Zaturyan T. G. & Grigoryan C. B. 1987: Orobanchaceae. — Pp. 361–384 in: Takhtadzjan A. L. (ed.), Flora Armenii 8. — Yerevan: Akademia Nauk Armyanskoj SSR. Google Scholar

200.

Zhang Z.-Y. 1988: Taxonomy of the Chinese Orobanche and its relationship with related genera. — Acta Phytotax. Sin. 26: 394–403. Google Scholar

201.

Zhang Z.-Y. 1990: Orobanchaceae. — Pp. 69–124 in: Wang W.-T. (ed.), Zhongguo zhiwuzhi. Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae 69. — Beijing: Kexue Chubanshe [Science Press]. Google Scholar

202.

Zhang Z.-Y. & Tzvelev N. N. 1998: Orobanchaceae. — Pp. 229–243 in: Wu Z.-Y. & Raven P. H. (ed.), Flora of China 18. Scrophulariaceae through Gesneriaceae. — Beijing: Science Press; St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press. Google Scholar

203.

Zonneveld J. M. 1999: Enige nieuwe combinaties in Sempervivum. — Succulenta 78: 84–94. Google Scholar
© 2018 The Authors ·
Eckhard Von Raab-Straube and Thomas Raus "Euro+Med-Checklist Notulae, 9," Willdenowia 48(2), 195-220, (1 July 2018). https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.48.48203
Received: 10 January 2018; Accepted: 20 June 2018; Published: 1 July 2018
KEYWORDS
distribution
Euro+Med PlantBase
Europe
Med-Checklist
Mediterranean
new combination
new record
Back to Top