Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2008 Lower Turonian Record of Belemnite Praeactinocamax from NW Siberia and Its Palaeogeographic Significance
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Specimens of the belemnitellid Praeactinocamax Naidin, 1964 are described from the Upper Cretaceous of NW Siberia (Taimyr Region, Lower Agapa River, Russia). The rostra determined as Praeactinocamax aff. plenus consist of an aragonitic anterior part and a calcitic posterior part with a sharp boundary in between. This boundary surface is referred to as the “alveolar fracture”, and it is a typical morphological feature of early belemnitellids and not a result of diagenetic processes. The occurrence of Praeactinocamax in Arctic areas shows a wider palaeobiogeographical distribution of the genus in the Late Cenomanian—Early Turonian interval than previously known. This finding suggests that migration of the late Cenomanian—early Turonian fauna occurred across Turgai channel. The geographic position of these new records may also explain the occurrence of Praeactinocamax in the Turonian of the US Western Interior Seaway, the origin of which has been hitherto unclear.

Introduction

Cenomanian—Turonian early belemnitellid Praeactinocamax Naidin, 1964 is well known from Central Asia, Russian Platform, Europe, Greenland, and Northern America (Christensen 1997b; Košťák 2004). During this time interval, the genus shows widest palaeogeographic distribution in its history. Since Coniacian, the distribution rapidly decreased and the genus became extinct in the early Santonian (Košťák and Wiese 2006). In August 1973, Dmitriy P. Naidin (Moscow State University, Russia) collected numerous molluscs from dark brownish-grey clay-ironstone concretions along the Lower Agapa River (Piasina River basin, Usť Yenisei Lowlands, Taimyr Region, NW Siberia, see Fig. 1) with preserved aragonitic mineralogy of the shells including nacreous layers. This exceptionally preserved fauna of late Cenomanian to early Turonian age included fragments of calcitic belemnitellid rostra with preserved aragonitic phragmocones. These rostra were previously assigned to the genus Goniocamax Naidin, 1964 (Naidin et al. 1978; Teys et al. 1978; Barskov et al. 1997; Dauphin et al. 2007), the generic assignment that is critically reviewed in this paper. The goal if this paper is to re-examine taxonomic status of these fossils based on the presence of the so-called “alveolar fracture” (Figs. 2, 3), and to discuss their palaebiogeographic significance.

Institutional abbreviation.

  • IGP, Institute of Geology and Palaeontology Faculty of Science, Charles University Prague, Czech Republic;

  • MSU, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia.

Other abbreviations.

  • FAD, First Appearance Data;

  • OAE, Oceanic Anoxic Event.

Geological setting

The collecting site is located ca. 120 km north of the town of Noril'sk, in river cliff exposures on the Agapa River (Fig. 1A). The observed facies development there suggests a gradual shift from continental to fully marine deposits at the Cenomanian—Turonian boundary. A subdivision into several lithostratigraphic units given by Zakharov et al. (1989; see also Fig. 1B) is briefly summarized here.

The base of the section (Bed I-thickness = 25 m) is formed by cross-bedded alluvial/ deltaic quarzitic sediments (sandstones) with wood fragments (lignite) forming lenses, coal intercalations, and amber (reunite) grains containing a few insects. These are overlain by horizontally-bedded sandstones, siltstones, and claystone with sideritic concretions, intercalated by lenses of clayey breccia (Bed II-thickness = 9.2 m). Bed III (12.5 m) consists of clayey siltstones with the first marine fauna (inoceramid and other bivalves, gastropods and undetermined belemnites). Sideritic beds at the bottom of Bed III yielded Inoceramus pictus J. de C. Sowerby, 1829. In the higher parts of the bed, there are shell accumulations of lopatinid and ctenodontid bivalves, gastropods, and undetermined belemnite rostra fragments. Bed IV (5.5 m) consists of fine-grained greenish-grey to green (leptochlorite) sandstone. In the upper part, there are two separate horizons of calcareous sandstone. In the terminal part of this unit, a horizon with sideritic concretions yielded Inoceramus pictus and other fauna. Bed V (6.8 m) comprises an alternation of bioturbated siltstone and silty grey claystone with accumulations of small bivalves and gastropods. Bed VI (3.5 m) is represented by a greenish-grey leptochloritic siltstone with phosphatic nodules containing I. pictus and other undetermined bivalves, gastropods, ammonites (large Placenticeras and rarer Borissiakoceras), and belemnite fragments. Bed VII (20 m) is a dark grey, bituminous clayey siltstone. According to Zakharov et al. (1991), this bed represents the maximum transgressive level in North-western Siberia and it may be the local expression of the global OAE II (see Tsikos et al. 2004; with further references therein). In its middle part, a horizon of greenish grey siltstone with large (100–400 mm) clay-ironstone concretions occurs. These concretions yielded a very rich fauna consisting of Mytiloides labiatus (Schlotheim, 1813), Inoceramus agapensis Khomentovsky, 1992, Mytiloides cf. hattini Elder, 1991, Borissiakoceras inconstans Cobban and Cryc, 1961, Praeactinocamax aff. plenus (Blainville, 1825), small bivalves (Cucullaea sp.), and gastropods with primary aragonite preserved. The succeeding Bed VIII is formed by light grey fine-grained sands with fossiliferous carbonate concretions at the base. Teys et al. (1978), Naidin et al. (1978), Efremova (1978), Barskov et al. (1997), and Mikhailova and Naidin (2002) reported the following additional ammonite fauna from the Lower Agapa sections: Borissiakoceras inconstans Cobban and Cryc, 1961; B. aff. ashurkojfae Cobban and Cryc, 1961; B. orbiculatum Stephenson, 1955; Placenticeras cf. pseudoplacenta Hyatt, 1903; Placenticeras sp.; Proplacenticeras sp.; Scaphites subdelicatulus Cobban and Gryc, 1961, Scaphites sp., the assemblage which proves an early Turonian age. However, Zakharov et al. (2003) reported large Placenticeras and— less frequent—Borissiakoceras already in the late Cenomanian (see above).

Fig. 1.

A. The geographic position of the North Siberian Upper Cretaceous belemnite locality at the Agapa River (Taimyr Peninsula). B. Schematic sketch of the exposed section at the find locality. Belemnite levels are indicated, for more details see text.

f01_669.eps

The exposures of the Lower Agapa River (Piasina River basin) were previously considered to be exclusively early Turonian in age (Naidin et al. 1978; Barskov et al. 1997). Based on the occurrence of Inoceramus pictus, Zakharov et al. (1989, 1991, 2003), Khomentovsky (1992), and Dhondt and Naidin (2004) extended the stratigraphic range of the Lower Agapa River section downward to include the upper Cenomanian. The exposures can be safely dated by the occurrence of I. pictus and Mytiloides labiatus as late Cenomanian to early Turonian. The precise position of the C/T boundary has not been established and cannot be determined from the literature data alone. Judging from the mode of preservation in clay-ironstone nodules, the Praeactinocamax remains described herein can be safely referred to Bed VII sensu Zakharov et al. (1989)—see Mikhailova and Naidin (2002), and they are, therefore, early Turonian in age.

Systematic palaeontology

Class Cephalopoda Cuvier, 1795
Order Belemnitida Zittel, 1895
Family Belemnitellidae, Pavlow, 1914
Genus Praeactinocamax Naidin, 1964

  • Type species: Belemnites plenus Blainville, 1827, Upper Cenomanian (Late Cretaceous), England (see Blainville 1825–27: 376, figs. 3, 11).

  • Emended diagnosis.—Medium-sized to large belemnitellids (guard up to 115 mm long) with allometric growth; adult specimens stouter and more lanceolate in ventral view than juvenile specimens; usually with short cone-shaped alveolar fracture, but some species with very shallow pseudoalveolus; ventral fissure absent; ventral furrow and ventral notch sometimes present; juvenile guards long and slender (needle-shaped); adult guards predominantly lanceolate in dorsoventral view and subcylindrical in lateral view. Dorsolateral compressions and furrows usually present; striation and vascular imprints in some species; granulation rare (modified from Blainville 1825–27; Christensen 1997a; Košťák 2004).

  • Fig. 2.

    Two morphotypes Praeactinocamax aff. plenus. Schematic sketches of morphotype A (A) in direct comparison with morphotype B (B) from Kazakhstan (Upper Cenomanian). Lateral sections of rostra showing alveolar end of morphotype A (C, specimen IGP KK8/15) and morphotype B (D, specimen IGP 170/11).

    f02_669.eps

    Praeactinocamax aff. plenus Blainville, 1825
    Figs. 2, 3, 4A–I.

  • Material.—Three uniquely well preserved alveolar fractures with phragmocones and several belemnite fragments of Praeactinocamax aff. plenus (MSU 3025-3). They were collected together with undetermined gastropods, small bivalves (Cucullaea sp.), Inoceramus agapensis Khomentovsky, 1992 (upper Cenomanian—?lower Turonian) and Mytiloides cf. hattini (see Dhondt and Naidin 2004), suggesting an early Turonian age. Zakharov et al. (1989) showed also the First Appearance Data (FAD)—of M. labiatus in Bed VII (Fig. 1B).

  • Description.—The material studied represents two distinct morphologies: (i) Morphotype A (Figs. 2A, C, 3A, 4A–C, E, H) characterized by a low cone-shaped alveolar fracture, which shows in this respect the greatest similarities with those of P. primus (Arkhangelsky, 1912) and P. plenus, (ii) Morphotype B (Figs. 2B, 3B, 4D, G, I) characterized by a very shallow pseudoalveolus (not exceeding 1.5–2 mm). The calcitic rostrum is fragmentarily preserved (Fig. 4A). It is medium sized (not exceeding ca. 65–70 mm) and is ventrally markedly flattened. The flanks are slightly depressed and form a dorsolateral depression. No dorsolateral double furrows or vascular imprints have been recognized. The alveolar angle is ca. 21°. The diameter of the protoconch is about 1 mm. The calcitic posterior part of the rostrum terminates in a low cone-shaped alveolar fracture and/or an extremely shallow pseudoalveolus or depression with a pit in the centre (Figs. 2, 3). This part juts into a white, anterior part of the rostrum, which is usually not preserved. The boundary between the white and the dark calcitic parts is very sharp (Fig. 4), without any transitional zones albeit the laminar growth lamellae continue from the calcitic into the white anterior part part without any visible interruptions. A shallow pit in the centre of the alveolar fracture marks the position of the protoconch (Fig. 4C–E). The area between the walls of the aragonitic anterior part of the rostrum and the phragmocone is formed by aragonitic matter (Barskov et al. 1997; Dauphin et al. 2007). However, in the specimen figured on Fig. 4D, G, this space was more altered than the walls.

  • Discussion.—Of interest is the fact that the anterior parts of the rostra, including the phragmocone, are preserved. The preservation of the anterior parts of belemnite rostra is exceptionally rare and only few records of this can be found in the literature (Saemann 1861–1862; Schlüter 1876; Moberg 1885; Jeletzky 1948). The original composition of the anterior part, separated from the calcitic posterior part by the so-called “alveolar fracture” (see Figs. 2, 3) was considered to have been primarily horny or formed by some another undetermined organic material without, or containing only a very low, calcium carbonate content (Saeman 1861–1862; Crick 1904), whereas the calcitic posterior part is generally regarded as being composed of low-Mg calcite. Naidin (1969) supposed that the alveolar fracture originated as a result of postmortal diagenetic processes, while Barskov et al. (1997) and Dauphin et al. (2007) suggested, also based on material from the Taimyr Region, that the original material of the anterior part of the rostrum was aragonite.

    In our specimens, there is a very sharp and distinct boundary between the aragonitic anterior, and the calcitic posterior part of the rostrum (Fig. 4). This contact likewise marks the morphological feature known as the alveolar fracture. Judging from a wealth of literature data (Naidin 1964, 1969; Christensen 1974, 1997a; Košťák and Pavliš 1997) and our own studies based on thousands of specimens (MK) of Praeactinocamax primus, P. plenus, and related species from Tadzhikistan in the east to England in the west in several different sediments (i.e., sandstone, marl, claystone, limestone etc.) with totally different diagenetic, histories, the shape of the alveolar fracture shows great morphological stability. In the case of P. primus, virtually no differences in this feature have been observed, while P. plenus shows slight differences in alveolar fracture morphology (see also morphometric analysis in Christensen 1997a: 67). The observed stability of the alveolar fracture morphology cannot be explained by diagenetic processes. Instead, the clear demarcation line between the calcitic and aragonitic part of the endoskeleton is suggestive of complex biomineralization process, which must have been genetically controlled. As can be seen from younger representatives of Praeactinocamax, the progressive calcification of the anterior part of the rostrum and the resultant progressive deepening of the pseoudoalveolus are important features in the evolution of this genus (Košťák 2004) as well as other Late Cretaceous belemnite lineages i.e., Goniocamax— Belemnitella (see Ernst 1964; Christensen and Schulz 1997; Christensen 1995, 1997a, 2000). The morphology of the alveolar fracture can thus be considered a reliable taxonomic feature of the Belemnitellidae. A conical alveolar fracture as described above is exclusively known from the genera Actinocamax Miller, 1823 and Praeactinocamax.

    All species of Actinocamax are characterized by a high-conical alveolar fracture and only slight differences are observable between the species. The mean value of the length of the rostra is between 30–35 mm and it usually does not exceed 55 mm (Christensen and Schulz 1997). The earliest species of this genus (A. verus antefragilis Naidin, 1964) occurred in the early Turonian and the genus became extinct about the Early/Late Campanian boundary (Christensen 1997a). No high-conical alveolar fracture (as the one of the most important taxonomic feature) is present in the material studied and hence these specimens can be safely excluded from Actinocamax. The size of the guard remains supports this idea. The guard diameter at protoconch area is about 10 mm in specimens studied, while in Actinocamax it is less than 1–2 mm (both, the top of high conical alveolar fracture and protoconch area are identical in any species of this genus). The maximum lateral diameter in Actinocamax rarely exceeds 5 mm (in few Coniacian and Santonian species) whereas lateral diameter of the studied Siberian specimens under question is two times larger.

  • Praeactinocamax is characterized by medium-sized guards not exceeding 115 mm in length (Christensen 1997a). The alveolar fracture is usually low cone-shaped, however, a relative deep (up to 6 mm) pseudoalveolus can be developed in some species (Naidin 1964; Košťák 2004). The depth of pseudoalveolus and the shape of the alveolar fracture are definitely not a result from preservation, and own data from material from various facies (i.e., sandstones, marlstones, limestones etc.) clearly show a morphological stability of this feature in all Praeactinocamax species (Naidin 1964; Košťák 2004). In Praeactinocamax, a trend towards a deepening of the pseudoalveolus can be observed. However, the morphologic lineage [P. primus; early to middle Cenomanian—P. plenus; late Cenomanian—P. planus (Makhlin, 1965); late Turonian—P. cobbani (Christensen, 1993); middle Coniacian—P. groenlandicus (Birkelund, 1956); early Santonian] kept a stable morphology of the alveolar fracture. The development of the pseudoalveolus is based on the deepening of the central pit and the calcification of its margin. A first slight deepening occurs in the late Cenomanian P. plenus (Christensen 1990, 1997a; Košťák and Pavliš 1997) and it is well developed in P. triangulus Naidin, 1964 (early Turonian), a possible derivative of P. plenus (Naidin 1964; Christensen 1974; Košťák 2004; Košťák et al. 2004). Within this context, our material can be attributed to Praeactinocamax.

    This feature has been reported from several P. plenus populations (see Christensen 1974; Košťák and Pavliš 1997; Christensen 1997a) that have been partly referred to P. triangulus, a species formerly regarded as a subspecies of P. plenus (Naidin 1964; Košťák 2004). A very shallow to deeper pseudoalveolus (2–5 mm) is also known in the early Turonian species P. sozhensis (Makhlin, 1973), P. contractus (Naidin, 1964), and P. sp. 1 sensu Košťák (2004). However, due to the extremely limited material available from the section under discussion more precise taxonomic comments at species level are not possible, but we safely can re-assign the material to Praeactinocamax (P. aff. plenus).

    Naidin et al. (1978), Teys et al. (1978), Barskov et al. (1997), and Dauphin et al. (2007) identified the belemnites from the Lower Agapa River section as Goniocamax. This generic assignment cannot be followed here due to the unequivocal Praeactinocamax character of the alveolar end in these belemnites. Goniocamax is characterized by the so-called “bottom of ventral fissure”, a line connecting the pseudoalveolus wall (near the protoconch area) with the ventral rostrum surface at the ventral notch (Christensen and Schulz 1997). Christensen and Schulz (1997) established the stratigraphic range of Goniocamax to be from the base of the Coniacian through lower Santonian. Košťák (2005) described the late Turonian species G. christenseni from Central Russia. The origin of Goniocamax is currently under examination by one of the authors (MK): no forms related to Goniocamax appeared until the late middle Turonian Inoceramus lamarcki Zone (Košťák et al. 2004; Košťák 2005).

    Dauphin et al. (2007), based on material from the same section, showed that the anterior white part consists of aragonite. They introduced a hypothesis concerning the original mineralogy of the entire rostrum. Microstructural and geochemical composition studies showed that the aragonite in all the shells from the Bed VII nodules (including the belemnites) had been affected to a greater or lesser extent by diagenetic alteration. The coexistence of both calcitic and aragonitic components in the same rostrum favoured their hypothesis that the primary mineralogy of the entire rostrum was aragonite rather than low Mg-calcite), and that the originally aragonitic posterior part of the rostrum had become secondarily calcitized in the course of diagenesis. Dauphin et al. (2007: text-fig. 1) showed an irregular and diffuse boundary between the calcitic—in their view diagenetically altered—posterior and the primary aragonitic anterior part of the rostrum. In fact, this may well be an expression of a geochemical/diagenetic boundary and we agree that there is geochemical evidence for diagenetic alteration. However, on both morphological and geochemical grounds, we do not agree with their final conclusion concerning the primary mineralogy of the posterior part of the rostrum, which we consider to have been composed of low-Mg calcite. Further evidence that this part of the rostrum of Praeactinocamax was primarily composed of low-Mg calcite rather than aragonite derives from combined cathodoluminescence, geochemical and microstructural investigations of well preserved posterior rostra of P. plenus composed of low Mg-calcite from Upper Cenomanian chalks of southern England (see Voigt et al. 2003: fig. 2). Those authors demonstrated that the parts of the rostra composed of completely fresh (i.e., unaltered) calcite were non-luminescent, while any diagenetically altered parts showed reddish-orange luminescence due to the early diagenetic incorporation of Mn in the calcite lattice (Machel et al. 1991). The good preservation of the unaltered calcite was supported not only by the low concentrations of Mn and Fe, and high concentrations of Sr, but also by carbon stable isotope data.

  • Stratigraphic and geographic range.—Early Turonian of NW Siberia.

  • Fig. 3.

    The alveolar fracture (alveolar end) reconstruction of Praeactinocamax aff. plenus with the position of phragmocone. A. Morphotype A, specimen MSU 3025-3/1 with low cone-shaped fracture, in ventral (A1) and lateral (A2) views. B. Morphotype B, specimen MSU 3025-3/2 with a very shallow pseudoalveolus with a pit in the centre, in ventral (B1) and lateral (B2) views.

    f03_669.eps

    Fig. 4.

    Belemnitellid Praeactinocamax aff. plenus Blainville, 1827; Cenomanian—Turonian boundary interval. Lower Agapa River, Northern Siberia (Russia). A–C, H, E. Morphotype A. Specimen MSU 3025-3/1 with low cone-shaped fracture, calcitic posterior rostrum (dark grey), aragonitic anterior part of the rostrum (light yellow) with phragmocone, lateral view. D, I, G. Morphotype B. Specimen MSU 3025-3/2 with a very shallow pseudoalveolus with a pit in the centre, calcitic posterior rostrum (dark grey), aragonitic anterior part of the rostrum (light yellow) with phragmocone; dorso-ventral view. F. Phragmocone MSU 3025-3/3 surrounded by aragonitic matter of the aragonitic anterior part of the rostrum (light). The calcitic posterior part is not preserved. Scale bars 10 mm. Abbreviations: phr, phragmocone; p, protoconch; ar, aragonitic anterior part of the rostrum; pr, calcitic posterior rostrum.

    f04_669.eps

    Discussion

    Whilst lower and upper Upper Cretaceous belemnite palaeobiogeography is well recorded in the literature (Christensen 1997b), the knowledge on the worldwide distribution of Cenomanian to Turonian belemnites and their palaeobiogeography is poor due to rare and stratigraphically/geographically patchy occurrences. In addition, taxonomic uncertainties (see below) also hindered the development of refined distribution and migration maps. The value of the records described here in results from the fact that it is the first record of Praeactinocamax from the Russian Arctic region of northern Siberia. Its occurrence there provides new palaeobiogeographic data, and it raises the possibility of a marine connection between the study area and the Russian Platform (Fig. 5A).

    Fig. 5.

    Palaeogeographic map of the Northern hemisphere (North pole projection). A. Turonian. B. Maastrichtian. Asterisked is locality Lower Agapa River under this study; arrows indicate the position of Turgai Channel; grey are lands, white are seas and oceans.

    f05_669.eps

    Praeactinocamax primus, the first representatives of the Late Cretaceous Belemnitellidae, appeared for the first time in the early but not earliest Cenomanian Mantelliceras mantelli Ammonite Zone in the Central Russian Subprovince (Christensen 1997) and continued into the Middle Cenomanian Acanthoceras rhotomagense Ammonite Zone (Naidin 1964; Košťák 2004). From there, it spread towards the west (Europe), but migration occurred mainly as short-term incursion events resulting from regression (connected shallow seas) and the initial transgression (Mitchell 2005; Wilmsen et al. 2007). Apart from the Russian Platform and the Russian Arctic area, there are Turonian records of Praeactinocamax from Europe (Christensen 1982; Košťák 1996; Košťák et al. 2004) and the US Western Interior Seaway (Christensen 1997b; Košťák 2004; see comments below).

    The occurrence of Praeactinocamax in northern Siberia is enigmatic. The radiation centre of belemnitellid evolution is conventionally considered to have been located on the Russian Platform (see above), but no evidence of Cenomanian to Santonian marine connection with the Arctic region has been proven so far by palaeobiogeographic similarities. Only during Maastrichtian times was the Turgai Channel opened (Fig. 5B), connecting both areas and enabling faunal migration (Zakharov et al. 2002). The occurrence of late Cenomanian (still indetermined belemnite rostra) to early Turonian representatives of Praeactinocamax both on the Russian Platform and in the Russian Arctic region, however, clearly demonstrates the existence of a previously unknown fully marine seaway between them. The possibility of such a seaway was questioned earlier by Zakharov et al. (2002), who mentioned a possible connection located in the northern Ural region based on similar inoceramid faunas from the upper Cenomanian to lower Campanian in the Russian Platform, Northwest Europe and the Arctic area.

    The presence of early belemnitellids in the Cenomanian and Lower Turonian of Northern Siberia not only fills a gap in knowledge but also helps in understanding the occurrence of Praeactinocamax in the US Western Interior Seaway (Jeletzky 1950, 1961) and the possible dispersal routes of this genus during Turonian times. Christensen (1982, 1997a, b) derived the origin of the North American Praeactinocamax from a North European Turonian Praeactinocamax stem via north-eastern Greenland. Later, Košťák and Wiese (2002), Košťák (2004, 2005), and Košťák et al. (2004) showed that North and Central European records are younger than those in the Western Interior Seaway. The latter authors (Košťák and Wiese 2002; Košťák 2004) therefore suggested an origin of the North American Praeactinocamax stem from the middle Cenomanian P. cf. primus and early Turonian Praeactinocamax cf. manitobensis (Whiteaves, 1889) described by Seibertz and Spaeth (1995) from NE Mexico. However, a taxonomic and stratigraphic re-assessment of this material has shown that these records actually represent specimens of Neohibolites. The material comes from socalled “Cuesta del Cura Formation”, the age of which is commonly given as upper Albian to upper Cenomanian (see Stinnesbeck 1991, 1993 for ammonite data), and this is in accordance with the re-assessment of the figured specimens as Neohibolites (Košťák and Wiese 2006), which are well known from the Cuesta del Cura Formation in Mexico together with Mesohibolites (see Seibertz 1987; Seibertz and Spaeth 2005). As a consequence, the North American middle Turonian belemnitellids must have been of different origin. In the light of the new records from North Siberia it appears possible that the WIS belemnitellids immigrated into the Western Interior Seaway via the North Pole area, from where they spread via Greenland to Europe (see discussion in Košťák and Wiese 2002; Košťák et al. 2004; Košťák and Wiese 2006). This interpretation is supported by the marked morphological similarity between the alveolar fractures in the Praeactinocamax described here and those of the P. manitobensis/walkei/sternbergi group of the Western Interior Seaway, Canada, and Greenland (Jeletzky 1961; Christensen 1982; Christensen and Hoch 1983).

    Conclusions

    • Exceptionally well preserved belemnite rostra from the northern Siberia previously attributed to Goniocamax sp. are herein attributed to Praeactinocamax aff. plenus based on morphology of the alveolar fracture.

    • The alveolar fracture of the Belemnitellidae shows morphological stability within the Praeactinocamax and Actinocamax (Naidin 1964; Christensen 1997b; Košťák 2004). The typical alveolar low cone-shaped alveolar fracture marks the boundary between the aragonite anterior part (which normally is not preserved due to early diagenetic dissolution) and the calcite posterior part. As this contact exhibits stable morphology in thousands of specimens seen so far, the variable biomineralization aragonite versus calcite must be strictly genetically controlled. Our interpretation contrasts with that of Dauphin et al. (2007) who, based on geochemical data, suggested a primary aragonite mineralogy for the entire rostrum.

    • The occurrence of Praeactinocamax in the Arctic region during late Cenomanian—Turonian times suggests the existence of a connecting seaway between the Russian Arctic and the North European Province or East European Province (for more detail see Košťák 2004; Košťák et al. 2004). However, the migration patterns and marine connections are still uncertain. The Arctic representatives of Praeactinocamax are potentially the ancestors of the belemnitellids that occurred in the middle Turonian of Northern America (i.e., North American Province).

    Acknowledgements

    We thank Dmitriy P. Naidin (MSU, Moscow, Russia) for providing belemnite material. We especially thank Christopher J. Wood (Scops Geological Services Ltd., Somerset, UK) for excellent linguistic review, for valuable tutorials, remarks and comments. The research is supported by GAČR: 205/06/0842, 205/07/1365, and MSM 0021620855. We also thank referees Dirk Fuchs (National Museum of Natural History, Luxembourg), Larisa A. Doguzhaeva (Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden), and Viktor A. Zakharov (Geological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia) for critical comments and valuable tutorials.

    References

    1.

    A.D. Arkhangelsky [Arhangelsky, A.D.] 1912. The Upper Cretaceous deposits of the East European Russia [in Russian]. Materialy diâ geologii Rossiji 25: 1–631. Google Scholar

    2.

    I.S. Barskov , S.I. Kiyashko , Y. Dauphin , and A. Denis 1997. Microstructures des zones calcitiques et aragonitiques des rostres de Goniocamax (Cephalopoda, Belemnitida), du Turonien de Sibérie du Nord. Geodiversitas 19: 669–680. Google Scholar

    3.

    T. Birkelund 1956. Upper Cretaceous belemnites from West Greenland. Meddelelser om Grønland 137: 1–31. Google Scholar

    4.

    H.M.D. de Blainville 1825–1827. Manual de Malacologie et de Conchyliologie. 664 pp. Levrault, Paris. Google Scholar

    5.

    W.J. Broderip and G.B. Sowerby 1829. Observations on new or interesting Mollusca contained, for the most part, in the Museum of the Zoological Society. Zoological Journal (London) 4: 359–379. Google Scholar

    6.

    W.K. Christensen 1974. Morphometric analysis of Actinocamax plenus (Blainv.) from England. Bulletin of Geological Society of Denmark 23: 1–26. Google Scholar

    7.

    W.K. Christensen 1976. Palaeobiogeography of Late Cretaceous belemnites of Europe. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 50: 113–129. Google Scholar

    8.

    W.K. Christensen 1990. Actinocamax primus Arkhangelsky (Belemnitellidae; Upper Cretaceous): Biometry, comparison and biostratigraphy. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 64: 75–90. Google Scholar

    9.

    W.K. Christensen 1993. Actinocamax cobbani n. sp. from the Coniacian of Montana and Wyoming and the occurrence of Late Cretaceous belemnites in North America and Greenland. Journal of Paleontology 67: 434–446. Google Scholar

    10.

    W.K. Christensen 1995. Belemnitella faunas from Upper Campanian and Lower Maastrichtian chalk of Norfolk, England. Special Papers in Palaeontology 51: 1–84. Google Scholar

    11.

    W.K. Christensen 1997a. The Late Cretaceous belemnite family Belemnitellidae: Taxonomy and evolutionary history. Bulletin of Geological Society of Denmark 44: 59–88. Google Scholar

    12.

    W.K. Christensen 1997b. Palaeobiogeography and migration in the Late Cretaceous belemnite family Belemnitellidae. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 42: 457–495. Google Scholar

    13.

    W.K. Christensen 2000. Gradualistic evolution in Belemnitella from the middle Campanian of Lower Saxony, NW Germany. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark 47: 135–163. Google Scholar

    14.

    W.K. Christensen and E. Hoch 1983. Actinocamax cf. manitobensis from the Kangerdlugssuaq area, southern East Greenland. Bulletin of Geological Society of Denmark 32: 33–42. Google Scholar

    15.

    W.K. Christensen and M.-G. Schulz 1997. Coniacian and Santonian belemnite faunas from Bornholm, Denmark. Fossils and Strata 44: 1–73. Google Scholar

    16.

    W.A. Cobban and G. Gryc 1961: Ammonites from the Seabee Formation (Cretaceous) of northern Alaska. Journal of Paleontology 35: 176–190. Google Scholar

    17.

    G.C. Crick 1904. Note on Actinocamax Mill., its identity with Atractilites Link. Geological Magazine 1: 407–410. Google Scholar

    18.

    G. Cuvier 1795. Second Mémoire sur l'organisation rapports des Animaux à sang blenc, dans lequel on traite de la structure des Mollusques et de leur division en ordres. Magasin Encyclopédique ou Journal des Sciences, des Lettres et des Arts 2: 433–444. Google Scholar

    19.

    Y. Dauphin , T.C. Williams , and I.S. Barskov 2007. Aragonitic rostra of the Turonian belemnitid Goniocamax: Arguments from diagenesis. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 52: 85–97. Google Scholar

    20.

    A. Dhondt and D.P. Naidin 2004. Some inoceramids from the Lower Agapa River outcrops. Cretaceous System of Russia. 2nd Russian Conference—Problems of Stratigraphy and Palaeogeography, 87. Sankt Peterburg. Google Scholar

    21.

    V.I. Efremova 1978. Inoceramids of the Turonian deposits of Usť-Yenisei Lowland. Jurassic and Cretaceous inoceramids and their stratigraphic significance [in Russian]. In : M.A. Pergament (ed.), Jurskie i melovye inoceramy i ih stratigrafičeskoe značenije (material of the III. and IV. All-Union Colloquium), 82–98. Akademiâ Nauk SSSR, Geologičeskij Institut, Moskva. Google Scholar

    22.

    W.P. Elder 1991. Mytiloides hattini n. sp.: A guide fossil for the base of the Turonian in the Western Interior of North America. Journal of Paleontology 65: 234–241. Google Scholar

    23.

    G. Ernst 1964. Ontogenie, Phylogenie und Stratigraphie der Belemnitengattung Gonioteuthis Bayle aus dem nordwestdeutschen Santon/Campan. Fortschritte in der Geologie von Rheinland und Westfalen 7: 113–174. Google Scholar

    24.

    A. Hyatt 1903. Pseudoceratites of the Cretaceous. U.S. Geological Survey, Monograph 44: 1–351. Google Scholar

    25.

    J.A. Jeletzky 1948. Zur Kenntniss der Oberkretazichen Belemniten II. Geologiska Föreningens i Stockholm Förhandlingar 70: 219–232. Google Scholar

    26.

    J.A. Jeletzky 1950. Actinocamax from the Upper Cretaceous of Manitoba. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin 15: 1–41. Google Scholar

    27.

    J.A Jeletzky 1961. Actinocamax from the Upper Cretaceous Benton and Niobrara Formations of Kansas. Journal of Paleontology 29: 876–885. Google Scholar

    28.

    O.V. Khomentovsky [Khomentovski, O.V.] 1992. Inoceramids from the Cenomanian—Turonian boundary beds of the Usf'-Yenisei Lowland. Geologic history of Arctica in Mesozoic and Cenozoic [in Russian]. VNII Okeanologiâ 1: 78–85. Google Scholar

    29.

    O. V. Khomentovsky 1998. Inoceramidi (Bivalvia) i biostratigrafiâ verhnego mela severnoj Sibiri. 20 pp. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis autoreferat. Novosybirsk. Google Scholar

    30.

    M. Košťák 2004. Cenomanian through the lowermost Coniacian Belemnitellidae Pavlow (Belemnitida, Coleoidea) of the East European Province. Geolines 18: 59–109. Google Scholar

    31.

    M. Košťák and W. Pavliš 1997. Biometric analysis of Praeactinocamax plenus (Blainv.) from the Bohemian Cretaceous Basin. Acta Universitatis CarolinaeGeology 41: 1–13. Google Scholar

    32.

    M. Košťák and F. Wiese 2002. Upper Turonian belemnitellid occurrences in Europe in the light of palaeobiogeography, sea-level fluctuations, and palaeotemperature fluctuations. In : K. Warnke (ed.), International Symposium Coleoid Cephalopods Through Time. Berliner Paläobiologische Abhandlungen 3: 61–65. Google Scholar

    33.

    M. Košťák and F. Wiese 2006. Remarks to geographic distribution and phylogeny of the Upper Cretaceous belemnite genus Praeactinocamax Naidin. Acta Universitatis Carolinae Geologica 49: 135–139. Google Scholar

    34.

    M. Košťák , S. Čech , B. Ekrt , M. Mazuch , F. Wiese , S. Voigt , and C.J. Wood 2004: Belemnites of the Bohemian Cretaceous Basin in a global context. Acta Geologica Polonica 54: 511–533. Google Scholar

    35.

    H.G. Machel , R.A. Mason , A.N. Mariano , and A. Mucci 1991: Causes and emission of luminiscence in calcite and dolomite. In : C.E. Barker and O.C. Kopp (eds.), Luminiscence microscopy: quantitative and qualitative aspects. SEPM Short Courses 25: 9–25. Google Scholar

    36.

    V.Z. Makhlin [Mahlin, V.Z.] 1965. New Upper Turonian Goniocamax of the Volga River [in Russian]. Paleontologičeskij žurnal 4: 26–32. Google Scholar

    37.

    V.Z. Makhlin 1973: Subclass Endocochlia [in Russian]. In : Novye vidy drevnih rastenij i bespozvonočnyh SSSR. Trudy VNIGRI 318: 87–92, 141, 171. Google Scholar

    38.

    J.S. Miller 1823. Observation on the genus Actinocamax. Transactions of the Geological Society London 2: 63–67. Google Scholar

    39.

    I.A. Mikhailova [Mihailova, I.A.] and D.P. Naidin 2002. On the taxonomic position and distribution of th genus Borissiakoceras Arkhangelsky, 1916 (Ammonoidea) [in Russian]. Paleontologičeskij žurnal 6: 46–56. Google Scholar

    40.

    S.F. Mitchell 2005. Eight belemnite biohorizons in the Cenomanian of north-west Europe and their importance. Geological Journal 40: 363–382. Google Scholar

    41.

    J.C. Moberg 1885. Cephalopoderna i Sveriges Kritsystem, II. Artsbeskrifning. Sveriges Geologiska Undersokning C 73: 1–68. Google Scholar

    42.

    D.P. Naidin 1964. Verchnemelovyje belemnity Russkoj platformy i sopredel'nyh oblastej. Actinocamax, Gonioteuthis, Belemnellocamax. 190 pp. Izdatelstvo Moskovskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta, Moskva. Google Scholar

    43.

    D.P. Naidin 1969. Morfologiâ i paleobiologiâ verhnemelovyh belemnitov. 302 pp. Izdatelstvo Moskovskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta, Moskva. Google Scholar

    44.

    D.P. Naidin 1978. Stratigraphic and geographic distribution of Upper Cretaceous belemnites. In : E.E. Milanovsky and I.A. Dobruskina (eds.), Problemy stratigrafii i istoričeskoj geologii , 56–70. Izdatelstvo Moskovskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta, Moskva. Google Scholar

    45.

    D.P. Naidin and M. Košťák 2000. Palaeobiogeography of the Cenomanian through the lowermost Coniacian belemnites (Belemnitellidae, Belemnitida) from eastern parts of the European Palaeobiogeographic Region. Schriften des Staatlichen Museums für Mineralogie und Geologie zu Dresden 11: 100–101. Google Scholar

    46.

    A.P. Pavlow [Pavlov, A.P.] 1914. Jurassic and lower Cretaceous Cephalopoda of North Siberia [in Russian]. Zapiski Imperatorskoj Akademii Nauk, Seriâ 8, Po Fiziko-Matematičeskomu Otdeleniû 21: 1–68. Google Scholar

    47.

    L. Saemann 1861–1862. Observation sur Belemnites quadratus Defr. Bulletin de la Société géologique de France 2: 1025–1029. Google Scholar

    48.

    E. Seibertz 1987. Paleontología y estratigrafía de los Neohibolites del Albiano de Tepexi de Rodríguez, Edo. de Puebla (Cretáciso Medio, México). Revista de la Sociedad mexicana de Paleontologia 1: 285–299. Google Scholar

    49.

    E. Seibertz and C. Spaeth 1995. Die Kreide-Belemniten von Mexiko II. Belemniten des Turon Nord-Mexikos. Berliner Geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen E 16: 45–51. Google Scholar

    50.

    E. Seibertz and C. Spaeth 2005. Cretaceous belemnites of Mexico IV. Mexican Mesohibolites and palaeobiogeographical implications of the distribution of the genus (Albian, Lower Cretaceous). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen 236: 95–113. Google Scholar

    51.

    C. Schlüter 1876. Cephalopoden der oberen deutschen Kreide. Palaeontographica 24: 123–263. Google Scholar

    52.

    E.T. Schlotheim 1813. Beiträge zur Naturgeschichte der Versteinerungen in geognosticher Hinsicht. Leonhard's Taschenbuch der Mineralogie 1: 7–134. Google Scholar

    53.

    J. de C. Sowerby 1829. The Mineral Conchology of Great Britain VI. 168 pp. Richard Taylor, London. Google Scholar

    54.

    L.W. Stephenson 1955. Basal Eagle Ford fauna (Cenomanian) in Johnson in Tarrant Counties, Texas. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 214C: 53–67. Google Scholar

    55.

    W. Stinnesbeck 1991. Ammonites de la Formacion Cuesta del Cura (Albiano Superior-Cenomaniano Inferior) en el area de Galeana, Nuevo Leon. Revista de la Sociedad mexicana de Paleontologia 4: 63–85. Google Scholar

    56.

    W. Stinnesbeck 1993. Sobre una fáunula de ammonites de la Formación Cuesta del Cura (Albiano Superior-Cenomaniano Inferior) de la Sierra de Catorce, San Luis Potosí. Actas Faculta Ciencias de la Tierra UANL Linares 8: 129–132. Google Scholar

    57.

    R.V. Teys , M.A. Kiseleskiy , and D.P. Naydin 1978. Oxygen and carbon isotopic composition of organogenic carbonates and concretions in the Late Cretaceous rocks of Northwestern Siberia. Geochemistry International 15: 74–81. Google Scholar

    58.

    H. Tsikos , H.C. Jenkyns , B. Walsworth-Bell , M.R. Petrizzo , A. Forster , S. Kolonic , E. Erba , I. Premoli-Silva , M. Baas , T. Wagner , and J.S. Sinninghe Damste 2004. Carbon-isotope stratigraphy recorded by the Cenomanian—Turonian Oceanic Anoxic Event: correlation and implications based on three key localities. Journal of the Geological Society, London 161: 711–719. Google Scholar

    59.

    S. Voigt , M. Wilmsen , R.N. Mortimore , and T. Voigt 2003. Cenomanian palaeotemperatures derived from the oxygen isotopic composition of brachiopods and belemnites: evaluation of Cretaceous palaeotemperature proxies. International Journal of Earth Science 92: 285–299. Google Scholar

    60.

    J.F. Whiteaves 1889. On some Cretaceous fossils from British Columbia, The North West Territory and Manitoba. Contributions to Canadian Paleontology 1 (2): 151–196. Google Scholar

    61.

    M Wilmsen , B. Niebuhr , C.J. Wood , and D. Zawischa 2007: Fauna and palaeoecology of the Middle Cenomanian Praeactinocamax primus Event at the type locality, Wunstorf quarry, northern Germany. Cretaceous Research 28: 428–460. Google Scholar

    62.

    V.A. Zakharov [Zaharov, V.A.], A.L. Beisel , and V.P. Pokhialainen [Pohialainen, V.P.] 1989. Discovery of the marine Cenomanian of the north of Siberia [in Russian]. Sovietskaâ geologiâ i geofizika 30: 7–10. Google Scholar

    63.

    V.A. Zakharov [Zaharov, V.A.], A.L. Beisel , K.V. Zverev , N.K. Lebedeva , and O.V. Khomentovsky [Homentovski, O.V.] 1989. Stratigraphy of Upper Cretaceous sediments of Northern Siberia (Jangoda river section) [in Russian]. Geologiâ i geofizika 18: 1–70. Google Scholar

    64.

    V.A. Zakharov [Zaharov, V.A.], N.K. Lebedeva , and V.A. Marinov 2001. Chronology and migration patterns of Upper Cretaceous marine biota. Memoir volume—birthday 90's of V.N. Saks [in Russian]. Geologiâ i geofizika 42: 53–55. Google Scholar

    65.

    V.A. Zakharov [Zaharov, V.A.], N.K. Lebedeva , and V.A. Marinov 2003. Biotic and abiotic events of the Late Cretaceous Arctic biogeographical realm [in Russian]. Geologiâ i geofizika 44: 1053–1164. Google Scholar

    66.

    V.A. Zakharov [Zaharov, V.A.], B.N. Shurygin [Šurygin, B.N.], N.I. Kurushin [Kurušin, N.I.], S.V. Meledina , and B.L. Nikitenko 2002. A Mesozoic Ocean in the Arctic: Paleontological evidence [in Russian]. Geologica i geofizika 43: 143–170. Google Scholar

    67.

    K.A. Zittel 1895. Grundzüge der Palaeontologie (Paläozoologie). 971 pp. R. Oldenbourg, München. Google Scholar
    Martin Košťák and Frank Wiese "Lower Turonian Record of Belemnite Praeactinocamax from NW Siberia and Its Palaeogeographic Significance," Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 53(4), 669-678, (1 December 2008). https://doi.org/10.4202/app.2008.0411
    Published: 1 December 2008
    JOURNAL ARTICLE
    10 PAGES


    SHARE
    ARTICLE IMPACT
    Back to Top