Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2010 A New Species of Water Vole from the Early Pleistocene of Southern Europe
Gloria Cuenca-Bescós, Jordi Agustí, Jaime Lira, Maria Melero Rubio, Juan Rofes
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

In the Early Pleistocene Red Lower Unit of the Sima del Elefante site (Sierra de Atapuerca karst complex, Burgos, Spain), levels TE9–TE13, dental and mandibular remains of an arvicoline are referred to as the new species Arvicola jacobaeus sp. nov. The new species has medium-sized hypselodont molars, with abundant cementum in the re-entrant folds, and thick enamel band with differentiation of the Mimomys-type. The occlusal morphology of M3 is simple. The dental morphology of the new species resembles that of Arvicola sapidus, though smaller. It is more derived, in size and morphology than the Middle Pleistocene species Arvicola mosbachensis. The morphologic affinities among Arvicola jacobaeus, Arvicola terrestris, and A. sapidus suggest a common ancestry. A preliminary phylogenetic analysis corroborates that Mimomys savini is the sister group of the Arvicola clade.

Introduction

The genus Arvicola Lacépède, 1799 is represented in the extant European fauna by two species: Arvicola terrestris (Linnaeus, 1758), the northern water vole; and Arvicola sapidus Miller, 1908, the southern water vole, which is larger and which is limited to the Iberian Peninsula and southern France (Díaz de la Guardia and Pretel 1978; Rekovets 1990; Abbassi and Desclaux 1996; Abbassi et al. 1998; Desclaux et al. 2000; Maul et al. 2000; Cubo et al. 2006; Román Sancho 2007; Centeno-Cuadros et al. 2009a, b). The morphological characters of the limbs of water voles are linked with their fossorial/aquatic adaptations; the aquatic or semiaquatic character probably represent the ancestral condition, as seen in A. sapidus (Cubo et al. 2006; Roman Sancho 2007). The related species, Mimomys savini Hinton, 1910, was probably a semiaquatic rodent that spread from Eastern to Western and Southern Europe along the wet plains of coast and fluvial environments (Cuenca-Bescós et al. 2001: fig. 2).

During the Pleistocene several species of the genus Arvicola have been recognized: Arvicola mosbachensis (Schmidtgen, 1911); Arvicola cantianus (Hinton, 1910); Arvicola bactonensis Hinton, 1926; Arvicola grenii Hinton, 1926; Arvicola praeceptor Hinton, 1926; Arvicola sapidus aupsensis Râdulescu, 1989; Arvicola chosaricus Alexandrova, 1976; Arvicola kalmankensis Zazhigin, 1980. These taxa were discussed in a number of papers, so we shall not touch upon them here (see Koby 1965; Râdulescu 1989; Rekovets 1990; Gromov and Polyakov 1992; Abbassi et al. 1998; Maul et al. 2000; Kalthoff et al. 2007; Markova 2007).

The large voles of the species Mimomys savini and its putative descendant, Arvicola, provide evidence for European biostratigraphy (Heinrich 1978; Kolfschoten 1993), not always coincident with the chronostratigraphic limits. More precisely, the Mimomys—Arvicola transition has been proposed as the biostratigraphic Early—Middle Pleistocene limit in Europe. The last appearance datum (LAD) of Mimomys and first appearance datum (FAD) of Arvicola is also used as the marker of the Cromer II—Cromer III boundary in England, Thuringia and the Rhine basin (Koenigswald and Kolfschoten 1996), dated around 600 Ka, while the chronostratigraphic limit of the Early—Middle Pleistocene is fixed in the Matuyama-Brunhes paleomagnetic reversal, at 780 Ka (Koci and Sibrava 1976; Kuiper et al. 2008).

Institutional abbreviations.—MPZ, Museo Paleontológico de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.

Other abbreviations.—a, anteroconid complex length; ACC, anteroconid complex of m1; acd, anteroconid; AL, anterior loop; ATA, Atapuerca; BRA, buccal re-entrant angle; LRA, lingual re-entrant angle; m1, m2, m3, the lower molars; M1, M2, M3, the upper molars; p, posterior lobe length; PL, posterior loop; ROI, region of interest; SDQ, Schmelzband Differenzierung s Quotient (enamel thickness differentiation quotient); T1…T5, the dentine fields or triangles. The re-entrant angles and the triangles are numbered consecutively from PL towards ACC of the m1; TE, Sima del Elefante site; TE-LRU, Lower Red Unit of TE; Z, depth.

Evolutionary characters for the study of fossil arvicolines.—In arvicoline molars, characters such as the cementum in the re-entrant angles, the enamel-free areas in occlusal view (which form the occlusal intersection with the dentine tracts in lateral or medial views), and the enamel differentiation between the trailing and leading edges, as well as the arrangement of this differentiation, are unique among rodent molars. These characters are linked to hypsodonty, or the increase in height of the molar crowns, that resulted from adaptation to an herbivorous, distinctly abrasive diet entailing substantial dental wear. As an adaptation to abrasive grasses the hypsodont molars became hypselodont in some arvicoline lineages, acquiring the character of continuous growth. The biological advantage of this molar type and its continuous growth is the ability to process very abrasive food, because the tooth tissue lost through wear is continuously replaced (Kesner 1980; Koenigswald et al. 1994). The loss of roots in the molars of some arvicoline lineages during the Pleistocene can be described in terms of a heterochronic process of paedomorphosis, or neoteny (Agustí et al. 1993).

Continuous growth generally gives rise to crowns in the form of high columns or dentine prisms, with an osteodentine core and bordered by enamel (Hinton 1926). On the occlusal surface, the prisms form a certain number of folds that produce reentrant and salient angles of enamel on the buccal and lingual sides. These dentine fields or prisms bordered by enamel form a pattern of alternating polygons that may either be closed or confluent and are termed triangles by authors (Meulen 1973; Rabeder 1981; Martin 1987; Repenning 1992). The dentine fields are varyingly confluent with one another, and with the anteroconid complex (ACC). The confluence pattern is one of the most useful diagnostic characters in arvicolines (Meulen 1973; Rabeder 1981, Repenning 1992). Closed or confluent fields in combination with the ACC shape in the wearing surface of cheek teeth make identification possible even when fossil remains are limited or incomplete.

Enamel differentiation and Schmelzband Differenzierungs Quotient (SDQ).—There are arvicolines with almost uniformly thick enamel bordering the triangles (undifferentiated type), and with a differentiation in enamel thickness between the leading and trailing edges (Koenigswald et al. 1994). Thickness differentiation is observed in the clade Mimomys Forsyth-Major, 1902, where rooted molars have a thick trailing edge. This character evolves into a thin trailing edge in the extant lineages derived from Mimomys: the genus Microtus Schrank, 1798 and the species Arvicola terrestris (Linnaeus, 1758). The Microtus-type represents the apomorphic character state, while in the plesiomorphic stage the enamel band is thicker in the trailing edge: this is the Mimomys-type (Heinrich 1978; 1987; Koenigswald et al. 1994; Koenigswald and Kolf-schoten 1996). In spite of that, in earlier representatives of the Microtus-type, in Allophaiomys Kormos, 1932, the enamel thickness is variable; it may be of the Microtus-type (Markova 2005), undifferentiated (Alcalde et al. 1981) or of the Mimomys-type (Meulen 1974). The enamel is undifferentiated or slightly Mimomys-type in the first representatives of the genus Allophaiomys (see Meulen 1974, Garapich and Nadachowski 1996; Tesakov 1998b). The examination of enamel differentiation is one of the parameters measured in the evolution and ontogeny of arvicolines (Heinrich 1978; Röttger 1987; Ventura and López Fuster 1989; Kalthoff et al. 2007).

Morphology of the molars.—Species of the genus Mimomys have a lower first molar (m1) with a simple and primitive occlusal morphology (Hinton 1926): from distal to mesial, the occlusal surface of the m1 comprises the posterior lobe, three distal triangles, and an anterior complex formed by two open triangles convergent with one another and with the anterior lobe or anteroconid complex (Meulen 1973; Repenning 1992). The three distal triangles are completely closed in the species of Arvicola, but in the species of Mimomys this character is more variable. The anteroconid complex of m1 also displays unique structures such as the Mimomys-kante, or ridge, and the enamel islet. The third upper molar (M3) is simple, with a single, closed triangle and a posterior complex with two salient angles, one buccal and one lingual. The posterior lobe varies from being rounded to triangular and is broadly connected to the two salient angles. In some species M3 has a simpler morphology, in which the triangles are broadly confluent both with one another (there is no closed triangle) and with the anterior and posterior lobes (Garapich and Nadachowski 1996). The more primitive species exhibit enamel islets in m1 and in M3 (Rabeder 1981).

Morphology of the mandible.—The mandible, which is scarcely represented in the fossil record, plays an important part in the systematics of arvicoline rodents (Hinton 1926; Repenning 1968; Kesner 1980). The diagnostic characters are: the ascending ramus and the double crest for the insertion of the masseter, which is divided into the upper or dorsal crest and the lower or ventral crest, the masseteric crests (upper and lower) originating at m1, the arvicoline groove, the deep and long internal temporal fossa separating the second and third lower molars (m2, m3) from the ascending ramus, the symphyseal eminence for the insertion of the digastric muscle. The eminence of the alveolus of the lower incisor is large and is visible on the lateral side of the mandible (capsule for base of incisor in Repenning 1968); in medial view it reaches up to the mandibular foramen in the ascending ramus, which has a high position. In this paper we also note the strong genial tubercle on the medial side of the water vole mandible. This is considerably larger in Arvicola than in Terricola or Microtus.

Fig. 1.

A. General situation of the Atapuerca localities in the Iberian Peninsula. B. A map depitcing the main karstic system of the Atapuerca Hill, and the main two sets of localities: the Trinchera del Ferrocarril or La Trinchera localities, where the Sima del Elefante belongs; and the Cueva Mayor-Sima de los Huesos system. Note that Sima del Elefante could be an ancient opening to the Cueva Mayor-Galería Baja karstic tunnel.

f01_565.eps

Origin of hypselodont taxa derived from Mimomys.—The genus Mimomys was widely distributed across the Northern Hemisphere during the Pliocene (Chaline et al. 1999, Repenning 2003), but at the beginning of the Pleistocene its specific diversity diminished considerably. This was accompanied by an important evolutionary change: various lines became more hypsodont, eventually leading to hypselodont genera such as Allophaiomys (Kormos 1932) and Arvicola (Agustí 1991; Agustí et al. 1993; Maul et al. 1998; Maul 2001). The first genus with hypselodont molars, presumed to be a descendant from a species of Mimomys, was Allophaiomys, small in size and with enamel that was undifferentiated or of the Microtus-type, which first appeared at the beginning of the Early Pleistocene, circa 1.7 Ma (Repenning 1992; Garapich and Nadachowski 1996). Less well-known is the appearance of hypselodont forms such as Mimomys oswaldoreigi Agustí, Castillo, and Galobart, 1993 in Spain (Agustí et al. 1993), likewise at the beginning of the Early Pleistocene. Much later on, at the beginning of the Middle Pleistocene (around 600 Ka), other groups of medium-sized to large arvicolines that lose their roots are Arvicola mosbachensis, Arvicola cantianus, and Arvicola terrestris in central Europe and the Pannonian Basin (Heinrich 1987; Kolfschoten 1993; Maul et al. 2000).

Origin of Arvicola derived from Mimomys.Arvicola is alleged to be a descendant of Mimomys because of the great similarity in the morphology of the occlusal surface of the molars (Koenigswald and Kolfschoten 1996), the loosening of roots and the complexity of the third upper molar (M3) being the evolutionary differences. The extant species of Arvicola share the rootless molars, and the M3 more complex, although they differ in their enamel differentiation: it is of the Mimomys-type in Arvicola sapidus, while of the Microtus-type in Arvicola terrestris. The SDQ values of the Mimomys-type were also present in the species Arvicola cantianus and Arvicola mosbachensis of the Middle Pleistocene.

While the origin of Arvicola terrestris as a gradual evolution of the phyletic lineage Mimomys savini—Arvicola cantianus (or Arvicola mosbachensis, see Maul et al. 2000)— A. terrestris, seems to have some consensus (Rekovets 1990; Kolfschoten 1993), the origin of A. sapidus is more doubtful. The first appearance of the most primitive representative of the lineage of A. terrestris seems to be well-established as having occurred during the second half of the “Cromerian Complex” (Kolfschoten 1993). Transitional forms are known from several sites (Râdulescu and Samson 1993; Kolfschoten 1990; Koenigswald and Kolfschoten 1996; Heinrich 1987).

For the origin of A. sapidus and its relationship to A. terrestris as well as to M. savini different models have been discussed. Rabeder (1981) postulates two lineages: one leading to A. sapidus and the other to A. terrestris; according to this model, the lineages became separated long before the beginning of the middle Pleistocene. Molecular genetic studies have dated the split of A. terrestris and A. sapidus around 250 Ka (Centeno-Cuadros et al. 2009b) and the genetic distance between A. terrestris and A. sapidus confirms their specific independence (Diaz de la Guardia and Pretel 1978; Rekovets 1990).

The aim of this paper is to present a new species of a large vole of early Pleistocene age, related to Mimomys and to Arvicola, in terms of size, morphology and enamel differentiation. So far it has only been found in the lower levels of the Sima del Elefante site from the Lower Pleistocene of the karstic complex of the Sierra de Atapuerca in Burgos (Spain).

Fig. 2.

Geologie profile and lithostratigraphic units (TE7 to TE21) of the cave deposits of the Sima del Elefante locality, in the Trinchera del Ferrocarril of Sierra de Atapuerca Hill. Below the trench (Trinchera) level there are nearly 6 m of unearthed sediments, though levels TE8 and TE7 were sampled in the north trench perforation during the field campaign of 1996. The floor of the cave was identified by the presence of a 40-cm thick limestone layer in the north drill. Underneath the limestone layer, a distinct set of sediments was found, which was interpreted to represent the infill of a cavity from a lower karst floor. Two strata have been distinguished: the uppermost, composed of clay, small clasts (1–2 cm), and manganese oxide; the lowermost, with rounded quartzite pebbles, is interpreted as part of a terrace of the Arlanzón River left into the cave. Modified from Huguet Pàmies 2007.

f02_565.eps

Geological setting

The Sima del Elefante site (labelled TE in stratigraphic, palaeontological and archaeological samples) is a major cave infill located in an ancient railroad cut (Trinchera del Ferrocarril) of the Sierra de Atapuerca (Figs. 13). It corresponds to an ancient opening to Galería Baja in the Cueva Mayor Karst subsystem, and is completely full of sediments of allochthonous origin. The stratigraphic section of Sima del Elefante, including Lower and Middle Pleistocene deposits, is 25 m thick, 19 m of which were exposed during the construction of the railway (Figs. 2, 3). This section comprises 22 levels, the lowermost of these, known as the Sima del Elefante Lower Red Unit (TE-LRU), are Early Pleistocene in age (Cuenca-Bescós et al. 2001; Rosas et al. 2004; Cuenca-Bescós and García 2007; Carbonell et al. 2008). The sample of fossil voles analysed here comes from the Lower Red Unit of the Sima del Elefante Atapuerca site (Fig. 3).

TE-LRU comprises levels TE7 to TE 14 and is extremely rich in faunal remains, most of which are very well preserved. The TE-LRU represents the Atapuerca Faunal Unit 1 of Cuenca-Bescós and García 2007 and Cuenca-Bescós et al. 2010). The faunal assemblage of TE-LRU is given in Table 1. Small mammals proved to be crucial in dating the Lower Red Unit of the Sima del Elefante site as the oldest one in Atapuerca (i.e., pre-Jaramillo faunas; Laplana and Cuenca-Bescós 2000; Rofes and Cuenca-Bescós 2006, 2009, in press; Cuenca-Bescós and García 2007). Moreover, the Lower Red Unit of the Sima del Elefante site is below a normal polarised zone in the stratigraphic sequence as indicated in Fig. 3. The arvicoline and insectivore associations, in particular, showed that this unit indicates an Early Pleistocene age, similar to the localities of Fuente Nueva 3 and Barranco León in the Granada basin (ca. 1.2–1.5 Ma, Cuenca-Bescós and García 2007; Carbonell et al. 2008; Cuenca-Bescós et al. 2010). This is consistent with the presence of the large-sized mustelid Pannonictis nestii, referable to the Early Pleistocene (García et al. 2008). Recent cosmogenic nuclide analysis dated the Sima del Elefante TE9 level to ∼1.2 Ma (Carbonell et al. 2008), thus confirming the biostratigraphically-inferred chronology (Table 1).

Fig. 3.

Synthetic column showing the lithostratigraphic units of the north section of the Sima del Elefante site, labelled TE (levels TE7 to TE19). Levels that correspond to the Lower Red Unit, TE-LRU are TE7 to TE14. Units TE20 to TE22 do not outcrop here, but in the southern section (see Fig. 2). Black arrow points to level TE9 from which the recently discovered human remains were retrieved, and where the burial dating, based on the radioactive decay of cosmogenics, has been calculated (Carbonell et al. 2008). The small arvicoline mandible points to the level (TE13) where the holotype of Arvicola jacobueus sp. nov. was found. The figure has been modified from Carbonell et al. (2008).

f03_565.eps

Table 1.

Early Pleistocene vertebrates of the lower levels or Lower Red Unit of the Sima del Elefante site, Atapuerca, Burgos, Spain.

t01_565.gif

Noteworthy is that the Lower Red Unit from Sima del Elefante, from where the new fossil vole was retrieved, yielded, during the field campaign of 2007, a hominin mandible that, together with Mode 1 lithic tools and faunal remains bearing traces of hominin processing, represents the oldest and most accurately dated record of human presence in Europe (Carbonell et al. 2008).

Material, methods, and terminology

A total of 121 dental and mandibular elements have been analysed. Some of the teeth, like those of the holotype, are still associated with the dentary (Figs. 4, 5, 6), although the majority consist of isolated teeth (Appendix 1, Fig. 7). The specimens were obtained by concentrating the sediment after a process of washing and sieving, with 0.5 mm mesh-size, the sediments excavated from Sima del Elefante during the course of the Atapuerca campaigns between 1999 and 2007, plus two previous sample pits in 1995–96. The fossil remains of small vertebrates are then packed in plastic sacs, labelled with an abbreviation indicating the year of the field campaign, the site, stratigraphic level, the excavation grid unit, and the depth (Z) in cm where appropriate, (e.g., ATA 04 TE-13 H-31 Z: 1150–1160), enabling us to maintain stratigraphic control throughout. Afterwards, in the Laboratory of Palaeontology of the University of Zaragoza, the small fossil remains are picked and sorted using a hand-held or binocular magnifying glass, and a preliminary classification of the fossils is recorded in the data base of the Atapuerca small vertebrates sampling record. The fossils are stored in the Palaeontology section of the Department of Earth Sciences of the University of Zaragoza, Spain. For the measurements and study in detail of the molars and mandible we use a binocular microscope with 7×, 16×, 20×, and 40× of magnification. The details and photographs of Figs. 4, 5, 7, were made with a Scanning Electron Microscope. The specimens studied for this paper are kept in the MPZ.

The nomenclature and measurements for the various parts of the occlusal surface of the arvicoline molars follows the proposal put forward by Meulen (1973), with certain modifications (Fig. 4), derived mainly from the works of Rabeder (1981), Repenning (1992), and our own studies. We here apply a new way of measuring the occlusal surface of the molars of arvicolines by the use of an image-capturing programme that allows one to measure different parameters in objects inscribed within a particular region of interest (ROI). Length, width, anteroconid length “a” and posterior complex “p” were measured in the rectangle (ROI) in which the outline of the tooth is inscribed (Figs. 4C, 7M). The parameter “p” is the length of the posterior complex in M2 and M3 measured from the mesial limit of T3 to the distal edge of the molar (Fig. 7). This parameter makes it possible to estimate the posterior elongation of both molars.

Fig. 4.

Dental terminology and measurements taken on the occlusal surface of the m1 of arvicoline molars from Heinrich (1978) and Meulen (1973), modified. A. Leading and trailing edges of a dentine field or triangle. B. The occlusal surface of a lower first molar of Arvicola jacobaeus sp. nov., with the triangles (T) labelled from distal to mesial (T1–T5). C. Measurements taken on the occlusal surface of the molar. Abbreviations: a, anteroconid length (AC-2+T4-T5); AC-2, anteroconid complex; b, width of the anteroconid complex; BRA 1–3, buccal re-entrant angles; c, opening or separation of the T4 and T5 triangles; EFA, enamel free areas; L, total length; LRA 1–4, lingual re-entrant angles; W, total width.

f04_565.eps

The enamel thickness is measured in accordance with the method devised by Heinrich (1978; 1987) and Koenigswald and Kolfshoten (1996), where the SDQ (enamel differentiation quotient) is the average quotient obtained by dividing the thickness of the trailing edge by that of the leading (see the meaning of trailing-leading edges in Kesner 1980) edge of the enamel fields of the first lower molar (m1). This method was modified by Kolfschoten (1990), applying the measurements to all the molars, both upper and lower (Fig. 4A). We calculate the SDQ with the formula proposed by Heinrich (1987), and Koenigswald and Kolfschoten (1996) slightly modified:

e01_565.gif

Where teet is the trailing edge enamel thickness of the dentine fields and leet is the leading edge enamel thickness of the dentine fields. The sum of the resulting index of each dentine field is divided by N, the number of total calculated indices of each tooth.

The study of the anatomical characters of the mandible is based on the work of Repenning (1968) and Kesner (1980).

Systematic palaeontology

Order Rodentia Bowdich 1821
Superfamily Muroidea Illiger, 1811
Family Cricetidae Fischer, 1817
Subfamily Arvicolinae Gray, 1821
Genus Arvicola Lacépède, 1799
Arvicola jacobaeus sp. nov. Figs. 47.

  • Etymology: From St. James or Santi Jacobi, the pilgrims' road to Santiago de Compostela that traverses the Sierra de Atapuerca and the symbol of the pilgrims (the scallop Pectem jacobaeus).

  • Holotype: Right mandible, with the complete horizontal ramus, the incisor and the three molars (m1, m2, m3). Catalogue number: ATA04 TE 13 H31 z1150–1160, MPZ 2008/380.

  • Type locality: Sima del Elefante site, Atapuerca, Burgos, Spain.

  • Type horizon: Lower Red Unit (TE-LRU), levels TE8–TE13, of Sima del Elefante site, pre-Jaramillo faunas, Early Pleistocene.

  • Material.—121 dental elements MPZ 2008/342-2008/462 (Appendix 1).

  • Diagnosis.—Medium-sized hypselodont Arvicola species with abundant cementum in the re-entrant folds, and thick enamel band with differentiation of the Mimomys-type. The enamel-free areas are present in both the salient angles of the posterior lobes of the lower molars (m1, m2, m3), as well as in both sides of the anterior lobe and in the T1 of the M1 and in the lingual side of the anterior lobes of M2 and M3. The occlusal surface of m1 is characterised by the absence of the enamel islet and Mimomys-kante. The distal triangles are closed to slightly confluent. The occlusal surfaces of m2 and m3 are of the Mimomys-type, with triangles that are slightly (in m2) to broadly (in m3) convergent; M1 has the anterior lobe and T1 slightly confluent, while T2 may or may not be connected with T1; M2 and M3 are of the Mimomys-type. The occlusal surface of M3 shows two to three fields, the anterior lobe 1 (AL1), the T2 and the rest of the molar, where budding T3 and T4 are variable in size. The M3, in basal view, has a thick enamel wall.

  • Differential diagnosis.—Arvicola jacobaeus sp. nov. is somewhat smaller (length and width) than the extant species of Arvicola; the occlusal surface of the m1 is derived, similar to that in Arvicola sapidus, though the M3 is primitive, similar to that in Mimomys savini; the enamel thickness is of the Mimomys-type, though fairly thick all around the enamel wall; the roots have disappear though in M3 the base of the crown is slightly close, and the enamel thicker in basal view.

    Arvicola mosbachensis, described by Maul et al. (2000), presents morphological resemblances in the occlusal morphology of the molars with those of A. jacobaeus. The differences between A. jacobaeus and A. mosbachensis are: the smaller size of the m1 and the M3 of A. mosbachensis; the lack of Mimomys—fold in m1, the lack of T5, the high confluence between T3, T4 and PC1 in the M3, and the thicker, though highly variable enamel-thickness wall of A. jacobaeus. As in A. jacobaeus, some specimens of A. mosbachensis display incipient root development and thicker enamel wall in basal view, though A. jacobaeus presents this plesiomorphy only in the M3. On the other hand, by comparison with Arvicola terrestris, A. sapidus, and Microtus, the M3 of A. jacobaeus has an enamel wall markedly thick in the basal part, a stage prior to the initiation of the root formation (Fig. 7K, L). On the contrary, in A. mosbachensis, all the molars show the thick enamel wall in basal view (Maul et al. 2000).

  • Description.—The mandible has the typical arvicoline shape. The mandibular corpus is stout and deep, with a short diastema. A strong symphyseal, or digastric, eminence is its most remarkable feature. In medial view, a large mental spine or genial tubercle for the insertion of the genioglossus muscle is situated just above the posterior part of the symphyseal process, and thus above the digastric eminence and below m1 (Figs. 5, 6). The symphyseal area is caudally extended, indicating a strong fibrous joint (Fig. 6). In lateral aspect, the large mental foramen opens below the mesial border of m1. The lateral surface has an enlarged masseteric fossa of which the rostral end is situated below T4 of m1; its dorsal end is limited by the coronoid crest. The posterior part of the mandible is not preserved.

    The molars of A. jacobaeus have abundant cementum in the re-entrant angles, and lack roots, folds and enamel islets. Moreover, the enamel differentiation is of the Mimomys-type and in general fairly thick throughout the perimeter of the tooth in its occlusal surface.

    The lower first molar (m1): this has a posterior lobe; three alternating, closed to slightly open triangles, T1–T3; and an anteroconid complex with two open triangles, T4 and T5, broadly confluent with the anterior lobe (Fig. 7A–C).

    The second and third molars (m2, m3): have similar occlusal surfaces to those of other species of Mimomys and Arvicola (Fig. 7D–F). In m3 the dentine fields vary from being broadly connected to slightly closed (Fig. 7F).

    The upper first molar (M1): has an anterior lobe and four triangles, T1–T4, which are slightly interconnected. T1 has an enamel-free area in the lingual salient angle (Fig. 7G–I).

    The second upper molar (M2): is of the general type in arvicolines.

    The upper third molar (M3): this molar has three dentine fields: the anterior lobe, the T2, and a third one consisting of the rest of the molar, the T3 and T4 that comprise a single field together with the posterior lobe. There are two lingual and two buccal re-entrant angles (Fig. 7J–M) Two M3 present a thickening of the wall on their basal surface (Fig. 7K, L).

  • Fig. 5.

    Occlusal view of the right mandible with m1, m2, m3 of the cricetid rodent Arvicola jucobaeus sp. nov. from Sima del Elefante level TE 13. Holotype (ATA04 TE13 H31 1150–1160, MPZ 2008/380).

    f05_565.eps

    Fig. 6.

    Medial view of the right mandible with il, m1, m2, m3 of the cricetid rodent Arvicola jacobaeus sp. nov. from Sima del Elefante level TE 13. Holotype (ATA04 TE13 H31 1150–1160, MPZ 2008/380). The photograph was made during the field campaign of 2005 by Javier Trueba.

    f06_565.eps

    Fig. 7.

    Occlusal views (except some root or basal views) of isolated teeth of the cricetid rodent Arvicola jacobaeus sp. nov. from Sima del Elefante level TE9. A. Right m1 (TE9 1 1997 MPZ 2008/343). B. Left m1 (TE9 1 1998 MPZ 2008/344). C. Left m1 (TE9 s/n 1998 MPZ 2008/372). D. Right lower m2 (tooth in mandible with the m1 of A) E. Left lower m2 (tooth in mandible with the m1 of B). F. Right lower m3 (TE9 1 1998 MPZ 2008/345). G. Left M1 (TE9 s/n 1998 MPZ 2008/374) H. Left M1 (TE9 s/n 1998 MPZ 2008/376). I. Root view of left M1 (TE9 s/n 1998 MPZ 2008/375). J. Left M2 (TE9 s/n 1998 MPZ 2008/377). K. Root view of right M3 (TE9 1 1998 MPZ 2008/346). L. Detail of the incipient root development in the M3 in K. M. Left M3 (TE9 1 1997 MPZ 2008/342). Abbreviations: L, total length; W, total width; P, posterior length; 2,3, triangles 2,3. The arrow in L shows the thicker enamel and the closening of the crown in basal view.

    f07_565.eps

    Discussion

    Compared with the rest of the arvicolines of the Lower Red Unit of the Sima del Elefante (Atapuerca) site, Arvicola jacobaeus is the largest. The occlusal morphology of the m1 is simpler than that in Allophaiomys lavocati, with an elongated anteroconid and Microtus-type enamel differenciation (Laplana and Cuenca-Bescós 2000). The species Allophaiomys nutiensis and Allophaiomys burgondiae are also smaller and have the Microtus-type of enamel (Cuenca-Bescós et al. 2010).

    Compared with other medium to large voles of the Early Pleistocene, Arvicola jacobaeus is similar in the occlusal surface of its molars to Mimomys savini, with a variable confluence between T3, T4, and the posterior lobe. The T4 is less developed than in Mimomys savini. The new species of Sima del Elefante lacks the enamel islet (which occurs mainly in rather young specimens in M. savini samples), the Mimomys fold, and the roots. In basal view, one M3 has a thick wall and a slight curvature which may be the stage prior to the formation of true roots (i.e., the sample of Mosbach 2, Maul et al. 2000) as in the M2 of Mimomys intermedius described by Râdulescu and Samson (1993). Note that M. intermedius is considered a synonymy of M. savini by most students (see i.e., Rekovets 1990; Gromov and Poliakov 1992; Maul et al. 2000).

    During the Middle and Late Pleistocene appeared Arvicola cantianus, Arvicola sapidus, and Arvicola terrestris, as recorded in the introductory part. The three species are somewhat larger than Arvicola jacobaeus, both in length and in width, while Arvicola mosbachensis from Mosbach and their common ancestor (Maul et al. 2000), Mimomys savini, are somewhat smaller than A. jacobaeus (Fig. 8).

    Arvicola jacobaeus has abundant cementum in the re-entrant angles, unlike the species of the genus Borsodia Jánossy and Meulen, 1975, a small- to medium-sized lagurine vole, with an occlusal surface superficially similar to that of Mimomys, which lacks cementum (Jánossy and Meulen 1975; Popov 2001).

    Fig. 8.

    Length—width scatter diagram of large arvicolinae rodents: Mimomys savini from the Lower Pleistocene levels of Gran Dolina, Atapuerca; Arvicola terrestris from the Upper Pleistocene levels of E1 Mirón, Cantabria; Arvicola jacobaeus sp. nov. from the Lower Pleistocene, Sima del Elefante levels TE9–TE13; Arvicola mosbachensis from Mosbach 2. Except the data from Mosbach 2, taken from Maul et al. (2000), the measurements were made by us.

    f08_565.eps

    The genus Kislangia Kretzoi, 1954 has the m1 larger than 4 mm, and confluent dentine fields, especially in Kislangia gusii from the Late Pliocene of Almenara-Casablanca 1 and Galera 2 in Spain (Agustí et al. 1993). In Arvicola jacobaeus the dentine fields are closed or exhibit just slight confluence, in particular the three distal ones, T1–T3 (Kretzoi 1954; Agustí et al. 1993; Minwer-Barakat et al. 2004).

    The species Allophaiomys vandermeuleni Agusti, 1991 is slightly smaller, the enamel is of the undifferentiated type (Agustí 1991), and lacks roots.

    The species Tibericola deucalion (Kretzoi, 1969) is also smaller, the SDQ lower, the enamel of the Mimomys-type, and the roots are lacking (Meulen 1974; Garapich and Nadachowski 1996; Tesakov 1998a). Ruiz Bustos and Sesé (1985) proposed the re-assignation of Allophaiomys deucalion to Arvicola deucalion, and at the same time as the first representative of the A. deucalion—Allophaiomys chalinei— Arvicola mosbachensis lineage. We here want to remark that (i) the molars of the species A. deucalion has the Mimomys-type. of differentiation of the enamel-thickness and lack roots, therefore it represents the most primitive species of the lineage Allophaiomys—Microtus; (ii) it cannot be the ancestor of Arvicola mosbachensis because the molars of this species exhibit incipient roots to different extent (Maul et al. 2000).

    The molars of the species Mimomys oswaldoreigi Agustí, Castillo, and Galobart, 1993 are smaller, though similar to Arvicola jacobaeus in the derived occlusal characters such as the lack of the enamel islet and Mimomys-ridge in the m1 (Agustí et al. 1993). The lack of roots, except in the M3, is also mutually shared.

    At this point, mention should also be made of the affinities of Arvicola jacobaeus with Tibericola jordanica Haas, 1966, from Ubeidiya (Koenigswald et al. 1992) and Yesher Benot Ya'aqov, Israel (Goren-Inbar et al. 2000). T. jordanica was initially classified within the genus Arvicola and described as a medium-sized to large species, lacking roots, with abundant cementum in the re-entrant angles and with T4–T5 separated to slightly confluent. Some specimens of T. jordanica display morphologies resembling Chionomys and not developed in Arvicola jacobaeus. The M3 is complex, with three well formed triangles. Another difference from A. jacobaeus is that the enamel thickness of T. jordanica is undifferentiated.

    Table 2.

    Measurements of the upper molars of Arvicola jacobaeus sp. nov. from Sima del Elefante, Atapuerca, Burgos, Spain, levels TE9–TE13.

    t02_565.gif

    A less derived species of Tibericola, Tibericola vandermeuleni, was described by Agusti (1991) from the Guadix-Baza basin (Granada, southern Spain), and originally assigned to the genus Allophaiomys. Tibericola vandermeuleni shares with Arvicola jacobaeus the ever-growing molars and a relatively simple and short anteroconid complex. However, the species are clearly different in many other respects. Arvicola jacobaeus is larger than T. vandermeuleni and shows Mimomys-type differentiated enamel, while the latter species has undifferentiated or slightly Mimomys-type. enamel. Moreover, A. jacobaeus has larger B values and much larger C values (sensu Meulen 1973; Agustí 1991). As in other derived hypselodont microtine species, the M3 of T. vandermeuleni is more complicated than this of A. jacobaeus, which in this way is more comparable to M3 of Mimomys.

    Arvicola jacobaeus also differs from some large species of Allophaiomys, such as Allophaiomys chalinei Alcalde, Agustí, and Villalta, 1981. Again, A. jacobaeus shares with the latter species the presence of hypselodont molars and its relatively short, simple anteroconid complex. However, the species from Sima del Elefante is considerably larger and presents much larger B values (Tables 2, 3). While in A. jacobaeus the enamel is always of the Mimomys-type differentiated, in Allophaiomys chalinei it varies, being even of the Microtus-type differentiated in the more recent populations (such as Gran Dolina levels TD5 and TD6; Cuenca-Bescós et al. 1995, 1999b, 2001). As with Tibericola, the occlusal morphology of the M3 of Allophaiomys chalinei is more complicated than this of A. jacobaeus and in basal view it lacks any trace of roots.

    Table 3.

    Measurements of the lower molars of Arvicola jacubaeus sp. nov. from Sima del Elefante, Atapuerca, Burgos, Spain, levels TE9–TE13.

    t03_565.gif

    Comparison of the enamel thickness of Arvicola jacobaeus with that in other large voles of the Pleistocene of Europe.—The separation between the species of the genus Mimomys and those of the genus Arvicola is based exclusively on the presence or absence of roots. For this reason it is particularly important to analyse the evolution of enamel thickness (SDQ) in the European large voles (Fig. 9, Table 4). The enamel differentiation of A. jacobaeus is of the Mimomys-type; see this work and descriptions in Röttger (1987) and Ventura and López-Fuster (1989).

    In 1978 and subsequently, Heinrich observed that the enamel of Arvicola evolved from a differentiated enamel of the Mimomys-type to a differentiated enamel of the Microtus-type, thicker in the leading edge (mesial in the lower molars and distal in the upper molars) (Heinrich 1978). Arvicola jacobaeus retains the Mimomys conditions, both in terms of enamel thickness and the form of the anterior lobe of m1. However, it lacks (through presumed loss) three of the features that characterise Mimomys, the fold, the islet, and the roots. On the other hand, the enamel differentiation of A. jacobaeus shows great resemblance to that of Mimomys savini, Arvicola cantianus, and Arvicola sapidus (Fig. 9). What is more, the enamel of A. jacobaeus tends to be uniformly thicker throughout the enamel wall (Fig. 7A–H, J) in comparison to Mimomys, Allophaiomys, and other Arvicola species.

    The origin of the southern water vole Arvicola sapidus

    In agreement with the above discussions we can conclude that both extant species of Arvicola share a common ancestor, with some authors implicating Mimomys savini (Kolfschoten 1990, 1993; Râdulescu and Samson 1993; Koenigswald and Kolfschoten 1996; Heinrich 1978; Maul 2001). However, some authors, such as Rabeder (1981), postulate two different lineages leading to the extant Arvicola sapidus and Arvicola terrestris, which became separated before the beginning of the Pleistocene. Ruiz Bustos and Sesé (1985) also postulated a different origin (from the species Allophaiomys deucalion) for the lineage Arvicola mosbachensis—Arvicola sapidus.

    The species Arvicola sapidus is morphologically more primitive than the species Arvicola terrestris (Cubo et al. 2006, this work), and also in its karyotype (Díaz de la Guardia and Pretel 1978). The new species Arvicola jacobaeus displays a mosaic of primitive, mimomyan and derived microtian character states. This is not unusual in the Iberian Peninsular, where other species of Arvicolinae exhibiting mixed characteristics have been described, such as Mimomys oswaldoreigi of the Early Pleistocene and Tibericola vandermeuleni of the middle Early Pleistocene. A morphological affinity with the species Mimomys savini is indicated by the size and the morphology of the occlusal surface in Arvicola jacobaeus, with enamel fields that are slightly confluent in some specimens, the general thickness of the enamel, the type of differentiation and the loss of roots in conjunction with the retention of the capacity to form them. This same morphology, the enamel differentiation and the loss of roots, also indicate an affinity with the species A. sapidus, which is nonetheless distinct from A. terrestris, in particular as regards the SDQ values (Fig. 9, Table 4) and the more advanced character of the occlusal morphology in m1 and M3.

    Fig. 9.

    Comparison of the SDQ values of large arvicoline rodents from selected literature (see text) as well as extant Arvicola sapidus from Spain (localities and ages listed in the same order as they appear in Table 4).

    f09_565.eps

    Table 4.

    Enamel thickness (SDQ) values of large arvicoline rodents of Europe. Measurements: Gran Dolina, levels TD3–TD6, Cuenca-Bescós et al. 1995; Gura Dobrogei and Casian caves, Radulescu and Samson 1993; several Holsteinian, Eemian, Saalian, Weichselian, and Weimar-Ehringsdorf localities in the Pannonian basin and Central Europe in Heinrich 1982; Miessehheim 1, Kolfschoten 1990; two Recent populations of Arvicola sapidus in Röttger 1987; Untermassfeld, Voigtstedt in Maul et al. 1998. Extant A. sapidas, and the Pleistocene A. sapidus from L'Abric Romani together with A. aff. sapidus from Galeria, Atapuerca, and A. terrestris from El Mirón, were measured for this work.

    t04_565.gif

    Table 5.

    Table of characters of the first lower molars (m1) and upper third molars (M3) of Arvicola jacobaeus sp. nov. from Sima del Elefante, Atapuerca, Burgos, Spain, levels TE9–TE13, and related arvicoline species used in the cladistic analysis.

    t05_565.gif

    The characterisation of the chromosomal complement, in number of chromosomes, shows that A. terrestris is a derived form (with more advanced chromosome number, 2n = 36), which split off the main lineage at an unknown time in the Pleistocene. There is an opinion that A. sapidus, with an ancestral karyotype (2n = 40) was present in most Eurasian faunas prior to the Late Pleistocene, whereas the chromosome speciation and a wide distribution of A. terrestris occurred in Late Pleistocene (Díaz de la Guardia and Pretel 1978; Kalthoff et al. 2007). Our own studies in Middle Pleistocene localities of Atapuerca such as Galería (Cuenca-Bescós et al. 1999a), as well as those by other authors based on materials from other sites in southern Europe (López Martínez and Ruiz Bustos 1977; López Martínez 1980; Râdulescu 1989), demonstrate that an ancestral form of A. sapidus, generally classified in the mentioned works as A. cf. sapidus, was already present during the Middle Pleistocene. Synaptic sex chromosomes, the ancestral condition of arvicolines, are present in A. sapidus (Megías-Nogales et al. 2003), reinforcing the idea of the primitive character of this species. Heterochronic evolution of the species A. sapidus also proves its primitive condition (Cubo et al. 2006).

    Phylogenetic analysis

    Morphologic affinity among Arvicola sapidus and Arvicola terrestris suggests a common ancestor; probably Mimomys savini as mentioned above. However, we know very little about the relationships among the extant species and their purported relatives of early, middle, and late Pleistocene age. Consequently we perform here a preliminary initial data exploration in a phylogenetic approach by analysing the characters discussed throughout the text in the m1 and the M3 (Table 5) using PAST (Hammer et al. 2001). Being well aware of its tentative quality the resulting cladistic analysis reveal that M. savini is probably the sister group of the Arvicola species, and that A. sapidus and A. terrestris are more closely related to each other than to other Arvicola species (Fig. 10) including the new species described here.

    Fig. 10.

    Cladogram of fossil and extant arvicoline species related with Arvicola jacobaeus sp. nov. from the Lower Pleistocene, Sima del Elefante levels TE9–TE13. The cladistic analysis has been performed using PAST; to find the shortest tree we use the branch and bound algorithm and the Fitch character optimisation criteria, and 1000 bootstrap replicates (Hammer et al. 2001). The number of Most Parsimonious Tree is one, the tree length 22, the Consistency Index 0.7273, and the Retention Index 0.6. The Bremer support or Decay Index has not been analysed.

    f10_565.eps

    Acknowledgements

    We wish to express our thanks to Andy Currant (Natural History Museum of London, London, UK), who showed and discussed with us the large arvicolines from West Runton many years ago. We thank Antonio Sánchez Baca (University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain), Jacinto Román Sancho (Estación Biológica de Doñana, Sevilla, Spain), Jorge Cubo (Université P.M. Curie, Paris, France), Maarit Jaarola (University of Lund, Lund, Sweden), and Scott Steppan (Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA), for their comments and discussions. Mark Ruddy (Royal Holloway University of London, London, UK) helped with the Arvicola amphibius/Arvicola terrestris debate. We are grateful to Juan Manuel López García (University Rovira I Virgili, Tarragona, Spain) for discussions and for lending us material from the Abric Romaní; and Juan Carlos García Pimienta (Gobierno de Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain) for the measurements of Arvicola of E1 Mirón. Also the people of the Colectivo de Salas (Burgos, Spain) helped us with the localisation of extant water vole populations. The Atapuerca excavation team helped with the extraction, sieving and washing of sediments each year since 1991. The two reviewers Lutz Maul (Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseum Senckenberg, Forschungsstation für Quartärpalaeontologie, Weimar, Germany) and Alexey Tesakov (Geological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia), and the editor Richard L. Cifelli (University of Oklahoma, Norman, USA) greatly improved the final draft of the manuscript. Financial support for excavation, sorting and curation of the material was supported by the Junta de Castilla y León, MICINN projects CGL2006-13532-C03-02, CGL2009-12703-C03-03, INAEM, Fundación Atapuerca, Grupos Consolidados del Gobierno de Aragón, and the University of Zaragoza.

    References

    1.

    M. Abbassi and E. Desclaux 1996. Arvicola Lacépède, 1799 (Rodentia, Mammalia) de quatre séquences du sud-est de la France et de Ligurie datant de la fin du Pleistocene Moyen et du début du Pleistocene Supérieur. Quaternaire 7: 29–37.  http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/quate.1996.2055 Google Scholar

    2.

    M. Abbassi , E. Desclaux , J.C. Marquet , and J. Chaline 1998. Répartition et Évolution des Arvicola Lacépède, 1799 (Rodentia, Mammalia) au cours du Pleistocène Moyen et supérieur en France et en Ligurie. Quaternaire 9: 105–116.  http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/quate.1998.1594 Google Scholar

    3.

    J. Agustí 1991. The Allophaiomys complex in Southern Europe. Geobios 25: 133–144.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0016-6995(09)90043-2 Google Scholar

    4.

    J. Agustí , C. Castillo , and A. Galobart 1993. Heterochronic evolution in the Late Pliocene-Early Pleistocene arvicolids of the Mediterranean area. Quaternary International 19: 51–56.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1040-6182(93)90022-8 Google Scholar

    5.

    G. Alcalde , J. Agustí , and J.F. Villalta 1981. Un nuevo Allophaiomys (Arvicolidae, Rodentia, Mammalia) en el Pleistoceno Inferior del sur de España. Acta Geológica Hispánica 16: 203–205. Google Scholar

    6.

    E. Carbonell , J.M. Bermúdez de Castro , J.M. Parés , A. Pérez-González , G. Cuenca-Bescós , A. Ollé , M. Mosquera , R. Huguet , J. van der Made , A. Rosas , R. Sala , J. Vallverdú , N. García , D.E. Granger , M. Martinón-Torres , X.P. Rodríguez , G.M. Stock , J.M. Vergès , E. Allué , F. Burjachs , I. Cáceres , A. Canals , A. Benito , C. Díez , M. Lozano , A. Mateos , M. Navazo , J. Rodríguez , J. Rosell , and J.L. Arsuaga 2008. The first hominin of Europe. Nature 452:465–470.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06815 Google Scholar

    7.

    A. Centeno-Cuadros , M. Delibes , and J.A. Godoy 2009a. Phylogeography of southern water vole (Arvicola sapidus): evidence for refugia within the Iberian glacial refugium ? Molecular Ecology 18: 3652–3667.  http://dx.doi.Org/10.llll/j.1365-294X.2009.04297.xGoogle Scholar

    8.

    A. Centeno-Cuadros , M. Delibes , and J.A. Godoy 2009b. Dating the divergence between southern and European water voles using molecular coalescent-based methods. Journal of Zoology 279: 404–409.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/J.1469-7998.2009.00632.x Google Scholar

    9.

    J. Chaline , P. Brunet-Lecomte , S. Montuire , L. Viriot , and F. Curant 1999. Anatomy of the arvicoline radiation (Rodentia): palaeogeographical, palaeoecological history and evolutionary data. Annales Zoologici Fennici 36: 239–267. Google Scholar

    10.

    G. Cuenca-Bescós and N. García 2007. Biostratigraphic succession of the Early and Middle Pleistocene mammal faunas of the Atapuerca cave sites (Burgos, Spain). Courier Forschunginstitut Senckenberg 259: 99–110. Google Scholar

    11.

    G. Cuenca-Bescós , J.I. Canudo , and C. Laplana 1995. Los Arvicólidos (Rodentia, Mammalia) de los niveles inferiores de Gran Dolina (Pleistoceno Inferior, Atapuerca, Burgos, España). Revista Española de Paleontología 10: 202–218. Google Scholar

    12.

    G. Cuenca-Bescós , J.I. Canudo , and C. Laplana 1999a. Análisis bioestratigráfico de los roedores del Pleistoceno Medio del yacimiento de Galería (Sierra de Atapuerca, Burgos). Memorias. Arqueología en Castilla y León. Atapuerca: Ocupaciones Humanas y Paleoecología del Yacimiento de Galería 7: 189–210. Google Scholar

    13.

    G. Cuenca-Bescós , J.I. Canudo , and C. Laplana 2001. La séquence des rongeurs (Mammalia) des sites du Pleistocène inférieur et moyen d'Atapuerca (Burgos, Espagne). L'Anthropologie 105: 115–130.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-5521(01)80009-1 Google Scholar

    14.

    G. Cuenca-Bescós , C. Laplana , and J.I. Canudo 1999b. Biochronological implications of the Arvicolidae (Rodentia, Mammalia) from the Lower Pleistocene hominid-bearing level of Trinchera Dolina 6 (TD6, Atapuerca, Spain). Journal of Human Evolution 37: 353–373.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jhev.1999.0306 Google Scholar

    15.

    G. Cuenca-Bescós, J. Rofes, J.M. López-García , A.H. Blain , J.R. de Marfá , M.A. Galindo-Pellicena , M.L. Bennàsar-Serra , M. Melero-Rubio , J.L. Arsuaga , J.M. Bermúdez de Castro , and E. Carbonell 2010. Biochronology of Spanish Quaternary small vertebrate faunas. Quaternaire International 212: 109–119.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2009.06.007 Google Scholar

    16.

    J. Cubo , J. Ventura , and A. Casinos 2006. A heterochronic interpretation of the origin of digging adaptations in the northern water vole, Arvicola terrestris (Rodentia: Arvicolidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 87: 381–391.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00575.x Google Scholar

    17.

    E. Desclaux , M. Abbassi , J.-C. Marquet , J. Chaline , and T. van Kolfschoten 2000. Distribution and evolution of Arvicola Lacépède, 1799 (Mammalia, Rodentia) in France and Liguria (Italy) during the Middle and the Upper Pleistocene. Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia 43:107–125. Google Scholar

    18.

    R. Díaz de la Guardia and A. Pretel 1978. Karyotype and centric dissociation in water vole, Arvicola sapidus spp. sapidus Miller 1908 (Rodentia, Muridae). Experientia 34: 706–708.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01947271 Google Scholar

    19.

    A. Garapich and A. Nadachowski 1996. A contribution to the origin of Allophaiomys (Arvicolidae, Rodentia) in Central Europe: the relationship between Mimomys and Allophaiomys from Kamyk (Poland). Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia 39: 179–184. Google Scholar

    20.

    N. García , J.L. Arsuaga , J.M. Bermúdez de Castro , E. Carbonell , A. Rosas , and R. Huguet 2008. The epivillafranchian carnivore Pannonictis (Mammalia, Mustelidae) from Sima del Elefante Sierra de Atapuerca, Spain) and a revision of the Eurasian ocurrences from a taxonomic perspective. Quaternaire International 179: 42–52.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2007.09.031 Google Scholar

    21.

    N. Goren-Inbar , C.S. Feibel , K.L. Verosub , Y. Melamed , M.E. Kislev , E. Tchernov , and I. Saragusti 2000. Pleistocene milestones on the out-of-Africa corridor at Gesher Benot Ya'aqov, Israel. Science 289: 944–948.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5481.944 Google Scholar

    22.

    I.M. Gromov and I.Y. Polyakov 1992. Voles (Microtinae). In : I.M. Gromov and I.Y. Polyakov (eds.), Fauna of the USSR. Mammals, 3. 725 pp. Brill, Leiden. Google Scholar

    23.

    Ø. Hammer, D.A.T. Harper , and P.D. Ryan 2001. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4: 1–9. Google Scholar

    24.

    W.-D. Heinrich 1978. Zur biometrischen Erfassung eines Evolutiontrends bei Arvicola (Rodentia, Mammalia) aus dem Pleistozän Thüringens. Säugetierkundliche Informationen 2: 3–21. Google Scholar

    25.

    W.-D. Heinrich 1982. Zur Evolution und Biostratigraphie von Arvicola (Rodentia, Mammalia) im Pleistozän Europas. Zeitschrift für Geologische Wissenschaften 10: 683–735. Google Scholar

    26.

    W.-D. Heinrich 1987. Neue Ergebnisse zur Evolution und Biostratigraphie von Arvicola (Rodentia, Mammalia) im Quartär Europas. Zeitschrift für geologische Wissenschaften 15: 389–406. Google Scholar

    27.

    M.A.C. Hinton 1926. Monograph of the Voles and Lemmings (Microtinae), Living and Extinct 1. 418 pp. British Museum (Natural History), London. Google Scholar

    28.

    R. Huguet Pàmies 2007. Primeras occupaciones humanas en la Península Ibérica: Paleoeconomia de la Sierra de Atapuerca (Burgos) y la Cuenca de Guadix-Baza (Granada) durante el Pleistoceno Inferior. 569 pp. Ph.D. Dissertation, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona. Google Scholar

    29.

    D. Jánossy and A.J. van Meulen 1975. On Mimomys (Rodentia) from Osztramos-3, north Hungary. Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen 78: 381–391. Google Scholar

    30.

    D.C. Kalthoff , T. Mörs , and A. Tesakov 2007. Late Pleistocene small mammals from the Wannenköpfe volcanoes (Neuwied Basin, western Germany) with remarks on the stratigraphic range of Arvicola terrestris. Geobios 40:609–623.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geobios.2006.09.003 Google Scholar

    31.

    M.H. Kesner 1980. Functional morphology of the masticatory musculature of the rodent subfamily Microtinae. Journal of Morphology 165: 205–222.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmor.1051650208 Google Scholar

    32.

    F.E. Koby 1965. Remarques critiques sur les genres Mimomys et Arvicola. Eclogue Geologicae Helvetiae 58: 1093–1106. Google Scholar

    33.

    A. Koci and V. Sibrava 1976. The Brunhes-Matuyama boundary at Central European localities. In : J. Easterbrook and V. Sibrava (eds.), IUGS-UNESCO, International Geological Correlation Project 73/1/24, Quaternary Glaciation in the Northern Hemisphere Report 3 , 135–160. Washington. Google Scholar

    34.

    W. von Koenigswald , O. Fejfar , and E. Tchernov 1992. Revision einiger altund mittelpleistozaner arvicoliden (Rodentia, Mammalia) aus dem östlichen Mittelmeergebiet (‘Ubeidiya, Jerusalem und Kalymnos-Xi). NeuesJahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen 184: 1–23. Google Scholar

    35.

    W. von Koenigswald , and T. van Kolfschoten. 1996. The Mimomys— Arvicola boundary and the enamel thickness quotient (SDQ) of Arvicola as stratigraphic markers in the Middle Pleistocene. In : C. Turner (ed.), Proceedings of the SEQS Cromer Symposium. Norwich/United Kingdom, The Early—Middle Pleistocene in Europe , 211–226. SEQS, Norwich. Google Scholar

    36.

    W. von Koenigswald , M.P. Sander, M.B. Leite , T. Mörs , and W. Santel 1994. Functional symmetries in the schmelzmuster and morphology of rootless rodent molars. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 110: 141–179.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1994.tb01474.x Google Scholar

    37.

    T. van Kolfschoten 1990. The evolution of the mammal fauna in the Netherlands and the Middle Rhine area (Western Germany) during the late Middle Pleistocene. Mededelingen Rijks Geologische Dienst 43:1–69. Google Scholar

    38.

    T. van Kolfschoten 1993. On the origin of the Middle Pleistocene larger voles. Quaternary International 19: 47–50.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1040-6182(93)90021-7 Google Scholar

    39.

    T. Kormos 1932. Neue Wühlmause aus dem Oberpliozän von Püspökfürdfi01_565.gif. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie 69: 323–346. Google Scholar

    40.

    M. Kretzoi 1954. Bericht über die calabrische (Villafranchische) fauna von Kislang, Kom. Fejér. Állami Földtani Intézet Žvijjelentése az 1953 (1): 239–265. Google Scholar

    41.

    K.F. Kuiper , A. Deino , F.J. Hilgen , W. Krijgsman , P.R. Renne , and J.R. Wijbrans 2008. Synchronizing rock clocks of Earth history. Science 350: 500–504.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1154339 Google Scholar

    42.

    C. Laplana and G. Cuenca-Bescós 2000. Una nueva especie de Microtus (Allophaiomys) (Arvicolidae, Rodentia, Mammalia) en el Pleistoceno Inferior de la Sierra de Atapuerca (Burgos, España). Revista Española de Paleontología 15: 77–87. Google Scholar

    43.

    N. López Martínez 1980. Los micromamíferos (Rodentia, Insectivora, Lagomorpha y Chiroptera) del sitio de ocupación achelense de Aridos 1 (Arganda, Madrid). In : M. Santonja , N. López-Martínez , and A. Pérez González (eds.), Ocupaciones Achelenses en el Valle del Jarama (Arganda, Madrid) , 161–202. Publicaciones Excelentísima Diputación Provincial, Madrid. Google Scholar

    44.

    N. López Martínez and A. Ruiz Bustos 1977. Descubrimiento de dos yacimientos del Pleistoceno medio en el karst de la Sierra de Alfaguara (Granada). Síntesis estratigráfica de este período en la región bética. Estudios Geológicos 33: 255–265. Google Scholar

    45.

    A.K. Markova 2005. Eastern European rodent (Rodentia, Mammalia) faunas from the Early-Middle Pleistocene transition. Quaternary International 131: 71–77.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2004.07.020 Google Scholar

    46.

    A.K. Markova 2007. Pleistocene faunas of Eastern Europe. Quaternary International 160: 100–111.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2006.09.011 Google Scholar

    47.

    R. A. Martin 1987. Notes on the classification and evolution of some North American fossil Microtus (Mammalia; Rodentia). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 7: 270–283. Google Scholar

    48.

    L. Maul 2001. The transition from hypsodonty to hypselodonty in the Mimomys savini—Arvicola lineage. Lynx 32: 247–253. Google Scholar

    49.

    L. Maul , F. Masini , L. Abbazzi , and A. Turner 1998. The use of different morphometric data for absolute age calibration of some south- and middle Europaean arvicolid populations. Palaeontographia Italica 85: 111–151. Google Scholar

    50.

    L. Maul , L. Rekovets , W.-D. Heinrich , T. Keller , and G. Storch 2000. Arvicola mosbachensis (Schmidtgen 1911) of Mosbach 2: a basic sample for the early evolution of the genus and a reference for further biostratigraphical studies. Senckenbergiana Lethaea 80: 129–147. Google Scholar

    51.

    B. Megías-Nogales , J.A. Marchai , M.J. Acosta , M. Bullejos , R. Díaz De La Guardia , and A. Sánchez 2003. Sex chromosomes pairing in two Arvicolidae species: Microtus nivalis and Arvicola sapidus. Hereditas 138: 114–121.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1601-5223.2003.01717.x Google Scholar

    52.

    A.J. van der Meulen 1973. Middle Pleistocene smaller mammals from the Monte Peglia (Orvieto, Italy), with special reference to the phylogeny of Microtus (Arvicolidae, Rodentia). Quaternaria 17: 1–144. Google Scholar

    53.

    A.J. van der Meulen 1974. On Microtus (Allophaiomys) deucalion (Kretzoi 1969) (Arvicolidae, Rodentia) from the upper Villányian (Lower Pleistocene) of Villány-5, S. Hungary. Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Proceedings, Series B 77: 259–266. Google Scholar

    54.

    R. Minwer-Barakat , A. García-Alix , E. Martín-Suárez , and M. Freudenthal 2004. Arvicolidae (Rodentia) from the Pliocene of Tollo de Chiclana (Granada, SE Spain). Geobios 37: 619–629.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geobios.2004.05.001 Google Scholar

    55.

    V.V. Popov 2001. Late Pliocene voles of north Bulgaria. Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia 44: 143–172. Google Scholar

    56.

    G. Rabeder 1981. Die Arvicoliden (Rodentia, Mammalia) aus dem Pliozän und dem älteren Pleistozän von Niederösterreich. Beiträge zur Paläontologie von Österreich 8: 1–373. Google Scholar

    57.

    C. Râdulescu 1989. Preliminary note on the rodent fauna from “La Grotte des Cèdres” (Le Plan d'Aups, Var, France). Miscellanea Speologica Romanica 1: 327–333. Google Scholar

    58.

    C. Râdulescu and P.-M. Samson 1993. Dental morphology of the Mimomys/Arvicola transition forms. Theoretical and Applied Karstology 6: 199–206. Google Scholar

    59.

    L.I. Rekovets 1990. Principal developmental stages of the water vole genus Arvicola (Rodentia, Mammalia) from the Eastern European Pleistocene. In : O. Fejfar and W.-D. Heinrich (eds.), International Symposium on the Evolution, Phylogeny and Biostratigraphy of Arvicolids (Rodentia, Mammalia) , 369–384. Pfeil, München. Google Scholar

    60.

    C.A. Repenning 1968. Mandibular musculature and the origin of the subfamily Arvicolinae (Rodentia). Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia 13: 29–72. Google Scholar

    61.

    C.A. Repenning 1992. Allophaiomys and the age of the Olyor Suite, Krestovka sections, Yakutia. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 2037: 1–98. Google Scholar

    62.

    C.A. Repenning 2003. Mimomys in North America. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 279: 469–512.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1206/0003-0090(2003)279%3C0469:C%3E2.0.CO;2 Google Scholar

    63.

    J. Rofes and G. Cuenca-Bescós 2006. First evidence of the Soricidae (Mammalia) Asoriculus gibberodon (Petényi, 1864) in the Pleistocene of north Iberia. Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia 112: 301–315. Google Scholar

    64.

    J. Rofes and G. Cuenca-Bescós 2009. First record of Beremendia fissidens (Mammalia, Soricidae) in the Pleistocene of the Iberian Peninsula, with a review of the biostratigraphy, biogeography and palaeoecology of the species. Comptes Rendus Palevol 8: 21–37.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crpv.2008.08.004 Google Scholar

    65.

    J. Rofes and G. Cuenca-Bescós (in press). Evolutionary history and biogeography of the genus Crocidura (Mammalia, Soricidae) in Europe, with emphasis on Crocidura kornfeldi. Mammalian Biology.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2009.12.001 Google Scholar

    66.

    J. Román Sancho 2007. Historia Natural de la Rata de Agua (Arvicola sapidus) en Doñana. 197 pp. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid. Google Scholar

    67.

    A. Rosas , R. Huguet , A. Pérez-González , E. Carbonell , J. Vallverdú , v.d. J. Made , E. Allué , N. García , R. Martínez-Pérez , R. Rodríguez , R. Sala , P. Saladie , G. Simón , C. Martínez-Maza , M. Bastir , A. Sánchez , and J.M. Parés 2004. Initial approach to the site formation and Paleoecology of the “Sima del Elefante”: a Pleistocene karst locality at Atapuerca Hill. In : E. Baquedano and S. Rubio Jara (eds.), Miscelánea en Homenaje a Emiliano Aguirre. Zona Arqueológica 4: 134–155. Google Scholar

    68.

    U. Röttger 1987. Schmelzbandbreiten an Molaren von Schermäusen (Arvicola Lacépède, 1799). Bonner Zoologische Beiträge 38: 95–105. Google Scholar

    69.

    A. Ruiz Bustos and C. Sesé 1985. Evolución de los géneros Mimomys, Arvicola y Allophaiomys (Arvicolidae, Rodentia, Mammalia) en el Plioceno y Pleistoceno de la Península Ibérica. Estudios geológicos 41: 99–104. Google Scholar

    70.

    A.S. Tesakov 1998a. Early stage of Allophaiomys evolution in Eastern Europe. Paludicola 2: 98–105. Google Scholar

    71.

    A.S. Tesakov 1998b. Voles of the Tegelen fauna. In : T. van Kolfschoten and P.L. Gibbard (eds.), The Dawn of the Quaternary 60: 71–134. Mededelingen Nederlands Instituut voor Toegepaste Geowetenschappen, Haarlem. Google Scholar

    72.

    J. Ventura and M.J. López-Fuster 1989. Variación del índice de Heinrich durante el desarrollo ontogenético postnidal de Arvicola terrestris (Rodentia, Arvicolidae) del nordeste ibérico. Actas de la IX Bienal de la Real Sociedad Española de Historia Natural, Sevilla. Volumen de Actas: 259–268. Google Scholar

    Appendices

    Appendix 1

    Appendix 1

    Arvicola jacobaeus sp. nov.

    tA01a_565.gif

    continued

    tA01b_565.gif
    Gloria Cuenca-Bescós, Jordi Agustí, Jaime Lira, Maria Melero Rubio, and Juan Rofes "A New Species of Water Vole from the Early Pleistocene of Southern Europe," Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 55(4), 565-580, (1 December 2010). https://doi.org/10.4202/app.2009.0027
    Received: 11 February 2009; Accepted: 23 April 2010; Published: 1 December 2010
    JOURNAL ARTICLE
    16 PAGES


    SHARE
    ARTICLE IMPACT
    Back to Top