Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
24 May 2013 Neoselachians from the Danian (Early Paleocene) of Denmark
Jan S. Adolfssen, David J. Ward
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

A diverse elasmobranch fauna was collected from the early Danian Rødvig Formation and the early to middle Danian Stevns Klint Formation at Stevns Klint and from the middle Danian Faxe Formation at Faxe, Denmark. Teeth from 27 species of sharks are described including the earliest records of Chlamydoselachus and Heptranchias howelli from Europe. The fauna collected at the Faxe quarry is rich in large species of shark including Sphenodus lundgreni and Cretalamna appendiculata and includes no fewer than four species of Hexanchiformes. The species collected yield an interesting insight into shark diversity in the Boreal Sea during the earliest Paleogene. The early Danian fauna recorded from the Cerithium Limestone represents an impoverished Maastrichtian fauna, whereas the fauna found in the slightly younger bryozoan limestone is representative of a pronounced cold water fauna. Several species that hitherto have only been known from the Late Cretaceous have been identified, clearly indicating that the K–T boundary was not the end of the Cretaceous fauna; it lingered and survived into the early Danian.

Introduction

Invertebrates from the early Danian Cerithium Limestone in Denmark have been the subject of several studies (Rosenkrantz 1939, 1966; Heinberg 1999; Rasmussen et al. 2005) as have those from the middle Danian limestone, the bryozoan limestone (Floris 1980; Bernecker and Weidlich 1990; Willumsen 1995; Bernecker and Weidlich 2005). The vertebrate remains, however, have been left almost untouched, with the exception of a few papers on otoliths and shark teeth and remains of crocodilians and turtles from middle Danian deposits of the Faxe quarry (Davis 1890; Schwarzhans 2003; Bonde et al. 2008; Milàn et al. 2011). This paper will address the selachian fauna in these early Danian limestone rocks, which were deposited just above the K–T boundary clay (the Fiskeler) and provide us with a unique insight into the fauna of the Boreal realm shortly after the global mass extinction event.

Danian selachian faunas have been described from Europe (Herman 1977; Siverson 1993a, 1995), North Africa (Noubhani and Cappetta 1997), New Zealand (Mannering and Hiller 2008; Consoli 2009), and North America (Case 1996; Wroblewski 2004), but only a few studies include the lowermost Danian. The middle Danian selachian faunas of Denmark and Sweden have been studied by Davis (1890), but there are several problems, as mentioned by Siverson (1992, 1995) regarding the age, origin and locality of the specimens. These include the species Sphenodus lundgreni, Archaeolamna (Odontaspis) kopingensis, but also his Carcharodon rondeletti, as commented upon by Ravn (in Milthers 1908) and Bendix-Almgreen (1983), as this tooth presumably is from the Miocene of Malta. These problems with the Davis (1890) material could be because he did not collect the material himself, but bought it from local quarry workers.

Institutional abbreviations.—GMV, Geological Museumvertebrate collection, Copenhagen, Denmark; MGUH, Museum Geologicum Universitatis Hafniensis, Copenhagen, Denmark; OESM, Østsjællands Museum, Faxe, Denmark; SNM, The Natural History Museum, Copenhagen, Denmark (Danish abbreviation).

Other abbreviations.—Br1, lower bryozoan limestone (Kors næb Member); Br2, intermediate bryozoan limestone (Faxe Formation); Ce, Cerithium Limestone Member; D and NP, nannoplankton zones.

Fig. 1.

A. Map of Denmark with the localities mentioned in the paper (black squares). The extent of the bryozoan limestone is based on Thomsen (1995). B. Map of south-eastern Sealand, with Stevns Klint marked as the dark grey line. C. View of coral bank south-western face of the Faxe quarry, the persons in the lower central part of the picture give an impression of the magnitude of the bank. D. Maastrichtian bryozoan inter-mound troughs, with the Maastrichtian Chalk, Fiskeler, Cerithium Limestone Member and the lowermost section of the middle Danian bryozoan limestone (Korsnæb Member). Picture from 50 m south of Højerup Church (thickness of the Cerithium Limestone 40 cm). Lst., limestone.

f01_313.jpg

Geological setting

The Cerithium Limestone belongs to the Rødvig Formation and was named Ceritkalkstenen by Forchhammer (1825) from the presence of moulds of cerithiid-like gastropod Metacerithium balticum. Forchhammer (1835) later changed the name of this limestone to Faxekalken as he mistakenly took it to be the same as the middle Danian bryozoan limestone in the village of Faxe. The Cerithium Limestone was deposited in a wide belt from Stevns Klint in the south-east to Thy in the north-west, with a maximum width of around 100 km (Fig. 1A; Thomsen 1995), and with a thickness from around 0.3 m at Stevns Klint to 5.5 m at Nye Kløv, Thy. The limestone is well exposed along almost the entire 12.8 km of Stevns Klint and at Karlstrup kalkgrav and also at some localities in the north-western part of Denmark, Dania, Vokslev and Kjølby Gaard (Fig. 1A, B). The Cerithium Limestone is underlain by the Fiskeler, and overlain by the bryozoan limestone above an erosional hardground, indicating a hiatus. It should be noted that this hardground diminishes towards the west and is not present at Thy.

The Cerithium Limestone was deposited during the lowermost part of the Danian in the nannofossil fauna D1 and the lower part of D2 (Perch-Nielsen 1979) corresponding to NP1 of Martini (1971). The limestone is probably chemically precipitated according to Hansen (1990) and is mainly composed of uniform carbonate crystals in the silt fraction (Thomsen 1995). The fauna mainly consists of aragonite-shelled gastropods and bivalves preserved as moulds and calcite bivalves (Heinberg 2005; Machalski and Heinberg 2005). The limestone is heavily bioturbated by Thalassinoides and Spongeliomorpha- type burrows and is interpreted to have been deposited in shallow water based on both its invertebrate fossils and on its ichnofossils (Ekdale and Bromley 1984). The limestone was deposited above the boundary clay, but in the same Maastrichtian bryozoan inter-mound troughs as the Fiskeler at Stevns Klint, where the limestone is at its thinnest. Both the Maastrichtian chalk and the limestone are truncated by the hardground (Fig. 1D) that separates the Cerithium Limestone from the bryozoan limestone. At Stevns Klint the Cerithium Limestone is slightly diachronous with the older part south at Rødvig and younger part further north as demonstrated by Rasmussen et al. (2005) using foraminiferal biozonation. In contrast, Nielsen (1917: 7) thought that it was the reverse and that the Cerithium Limestone was reworked Maastrichtian chalk. The Cerithium Limestone is thought to have had a much larger distribution, but this is difficult to estimate following erosion. The Cerithium Limestone was thought to have been deposited in shallow water (Hansen 1990), but recent isotopic data suggests that it was deposited in a water depth in excess of 200 m (JSA unpublished data).

The precise extent of the hiatus below the bryozoan limestone (Korsnæb Member) is uncertain, but this unit was deposited during NP2–NP3 (Martini 1971) or coccolith zones D2–D3 of Perch-Nielsen (1979) and Thomsen (1995), the early Danian. At Stevns Klint, a thickness of up to 20 m is preserved, which is characterized by large asymmetrical bryozoan mounds reaching dimensions of 5–9 m high and 50–100 m long (Surlyk et al. 2006). Younger sections (early-middle Danian) of the bryozoan limestone are preserved and accessible at Faxe quarry, following a hiatus above the section at Stevns Klint. Within the quarry, bryozoan and coral mounds and bank mounds can attain very large size, of up to 200 m long and at least 30 m high (Bernecker and Weidlich 2005). The corals found in the quarry are low-diversity azooxanthellate coral communities of mainly dendroid scleractinians that are assumed to have flourished in a cool and deep water environment (Bernecker and Weidlich 2005). The bryozoan limestone is assumed to have been deposited at a depth of more than 200 m (Bernecker and Weidlich 1990), well below the photic zone. Bjerager and Surlyk (2007) have given a very detailed account of the bryozoan limestone at Stevns Klint, whereas our present understanding of the younger section of the unit at Faxe is still poor and needs further study.

Material and methods

Jan Rees (Karlstad, Sweden) collected 283 kg of Cerithium Limestone at Stevns Kridtbrud and JSA collected two samples of bryozoan limestone at Kulstirenden (100 kg) and at the Faxe quarry (160 kg) respectively. The samples of Cerithium Limestone, which was moderately lithified, were chopped into 5 cm blocks and processed in buffered acetic acid following the procedure of Jeppsson et al. (1999) at Lund University, Sweden. The samples of bryozoan limestone were processed by the method described by Nielsen and Jakobsen (2004). Residue from the 250 μm sieving was picked for vertebrate remains and yielded several thousand, mostly fragmented, but also some complete selachian teeth and dermal denticles. Small samples (5–10 kg) from Kjølby Gaard (Thy) and the Dania Kridtgrav, were also collected and processed with acetic acid following the procedure of Jeppsson et al. (1999) and sieved through 250 μm sieves, but did not yield any teeth. In general, sieves with a mesh size of 500 μm should be adequate but to ensure that no dermal denticles were missed, a mesh size of 250 μm was used. Almost all teeth have been bioeroded by microbial organisms and a majority of the material is not identifiable due to either fracturing or erosion and only material that has been identified has been counted. In the majority of the larger specimens from the bryozoan limestone, the root was either missing or preserved as a cast of chalk. However, smaller specimens were usually preserved with their roots intact. Most of the specimens have been gold-coated and imaged with a SEM (FEI Quanta 200 Inspect), but larger specimens were imaged with a Nikon D7000 DSLR with Carl Zeiss objectives and digitally stacked to obtain greater depth of field with Helicon Pro© software.

All specimens figured here are deposited at the Natural History Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen or at Geomuseum Faxe, Faxe, Denmark. Tooth terminology largely follows Cappetta (1987, 2012).

Systematic palaeontology

Class Chondrichthyes Huxley, 1880
Subclass Elasmobranchii Bonaparte, 1838
Cohort Euselachii Hay, 1902
Subcohort Neoselachii Compagno, 1977
Superorder incertae sedis
Order Synechodontiformes Duffin and Ward, 1993
Family Paleospinacidae Regan, 1906 sensu Klug, 2010
Genus Synechodus Woodward, 1888

  • Type species: Synechodus dubrisiensis (Mackie, 1863) from the Late Cretaceous of England.

  • Synechodus faxensis (Davis, 1890)
    Fig. 2A–C.

  • 1890 Odontaspis faxensis sp. nov.; Davis 1890: 390, pl. 38: 26.

  • 1929 Synechodus faxensis (Davis); Leriche 1929: 232.

  • 1976 Synechodus hesbayensis (Davis); Glickman 1976: pl. 21: 19, 20, 34.

  • 1977 Synechodus faxensis (Davis); Herman 1977: 36, pl. 1: 9.

  • Material.—One complete tooth from a juvenile (OESM- 10046-17) and two incomplete teeth (MGUH 1401, OESM- 10046-16) including the specimen depicted by Davis (1890) of the species from the Br2 in Faxe. A dozen more in private collections have been studied.

  • Description.—Teeth with a tall main cusp and two to four pairs of lateral cusplets on the deflecting shoulders. The main cusp has smooth labial and lingual faces, whereas the cusplets may carry a few irregular vertical folds on both faces. The cutting edge appears to be continuous and strong. The base of the crown overhangs the root and displays a strong concave indentation in anterior teeth but less so in laterals and posteriors. The labial face is convex and the lingual face is strongly so. Neither of the adult specimens has completely preserved roots, but the remnants of the roots exhibit a pseudopolyaulacorhize vascularization (Herman 1977). Juveniles have much coarser vertical folds on both the labial and lingual faces, with the folds covering the lower two thirds of the labial face and almost all of the lingual face.

  • Remarks.—Davis (1890) described this species as being smooth on both faces. This is incorrect, as the specimen depicted by Davis (1890: pl. 38: 26) does show weak folds on both faces. Anterior teeth may have fewer folds than observed in lateral teeth and the folds become weaker in larger specimens. Leriche (1927) commented that he has no doubt that the specimens from the Maastrichtian of Belgium and the Netherlands were the same species as Davis' (1890) tooth from Faxe.

  • Ward (2010) synonymised two mid-Cretaceous species of Synechodus, S. nitidus (Woodward, 1911) and S. tenuis (Woodward, 1889), with S. dubrisiensis (Mackie, 1863). This species has a similar distribution of folds as S. faxensis, that is anterior and presumed lower teeth display less folding.

  • The poorly known mid-Paleocene species Synechodus hesbayensis (Casier 1943), listed erroneously by Cappetta (2006: 105) as a junior synonym of Paraorthacodus eocaenus (Leriche 1902), differs from S. faxensis in having more developed vertical ridges on the labial crown face. Further study may demonstrate that this is a positional or ontogenetically variable feature and that S. faxensis is the senior synonym.

  • Stratigraphic and geographic range.—Late Maastrichtian of Denmark and the Netherlands to the Thanetian of the Urals (Herman 1977; Glickman 1957).

  • Family Orthacodontidae Glickman, 1957
    Genus Sphenodus Agassiz, 1843

  • Type species: Lamna longidens Agassiz, 1843 from the Late Jurassic of Mont Vohaye, Switzerland.

  • Sphenodus lundgreni (Davis, 1890)
    Fig. 2D–G.

  • 1890 Oxyrhina lundgreni sp. nov.; Davis 1890: 393, pl. 38: 9.

  • 1957 Eychlaodus lundgreni (Davis 1890); Glickman 1957: pl. 1: 16.

  • 1979 Orthacodus lundgreni (Davis 1890); Floris 1979: fig. 7.

  • 1993 Sphenodus lundgreni (Davis 1890); Siverson 1993a: 28.

  • Material.—Four almost complete specimens (including the holotype), a further nine cusps in the collections of SNM (MGUH1406 holotype, MGUH 29822, MGUH 29823, MGUH 29824, GM1881-3326, GM1885-881, GMV2012- 57 [batch number]), and dozens of specimens, many without roots, in private collections, all collected from the Br2 at Faxe.

  • Description.—Large monocuspid teeth (up to 60 mm high cusps). The cusp is tall, slender with strong deep folds covering the lower part of the labial face and with very short folds at the base of the lingual face, but folds may be lacking in some specimens. Both the faces are strongly convex. Anterior teeth are erect whereas lateral and posterior teeth are slanted towards the commissure, sometimes only in the upper part of the cusp. The majority of teeth display a strong sigmoidal curvature in lateral view, regardless of whether the anterior or posterior margin carries a strong cutting edge. The root is lacking in most teeth but most of the few preserved roots are low and wide with a concave base. Anterior teeth have much narrower roots (Fig. 2E).

  • Remarks.—By analogy with the Recent sand shark, Carcharias taurus Rafinesque, 1810, upper teeth are more likely to be sigmoid (Fig. 2D) and lower teeth more posteriorly recurved (Fig. 2E; Böttcher and Duffin 2000).

  • The teeth depicted by Mannering and Hiller (2008) from the Danian of New Zealand have much longer lingual folds and much more lingually protruding roots, characters which have not been observed in any of the Danish material. It is very likely that the material from New Zealand represents another species. None of the Danish specimens have lateral cusplets and the specimen depicted from New Zealand may be pathologic (Mannering and Hiller 2008: pl. 1: 6–9). Though Sphenodus may have been more common during the Jurassic, it has been found in the Maastrichtian of Antarctica (Richter and Ward 1990; Kriwet et al. 2006), but the material from Antarctica differs in that both the labial and lingual folds are very short compared to S. lundgreni, and is too poorly known to draw further conclusions on relationships.

  • The specimens depicted by Antunes and Cappetta (2002) from Angola appear to carry very similar folds as those in S. lundgreni, even though the Angolan material presumably is from the Campanian. The specimens depicted by Waldman (1971) from the early Paleogene of British Columbia, Canada are of too poor a quality for further comment.

  • Stratigraphic and geographic range.—S. lundgreni is known from the late Maastrichtian of Denmark to the middle Danian of Denmark and Sweden (Davis 1890). Teeth of Sphenodus sp. also occur in the Beltinge Fish Bed, basal Upnor Formation, Thanetian, in the UK and in the Thanetian at Shatrylisay, western Kazakhstan (DJW personal observation).

  • Order Hexanchiformes de Buen, 1926
    Family Hexanchidae Gray, 1851
    Genus Hexanchus Rafinesque, 1810

  • Type species: Squalus griseus Bonnaterre, 1788, Recent, worldwide distribution.

  • Hexanchus microdon (Agassiz, 1835)
    Fig. 2H, I.

  • 1835–44 Notidanus microdon sp. nov.; Agassiz 1835: 3, pl. 27: 1; 1843: 222; 1844: pl. 36: 1, 2.

  • 1952 Notidanus (Hexanchus?) microdon Agassiz; Arambourg 1952: 40, pl. 1: 1–55.

  • 1977 Notidanus (Hexanchus?) microdon Agassiz; Herman 1977: 98, pl. 3: 7.

  • 2002 Hexanchus microdon (Agassiz); Antunes and Cappetta 2002: 108, pl. 4: 3, 4.

  • Material.—Three almost complete upper jaw teeth (MGUH 29825, MGUH 29826, GMV2012-58) and two fragmentary teeth from the lower jaw collected from the Ce in Stevns Kridtbrud. Incomplete teeth of Hexanchus are common in the Faxe quarry (Br2).

  • Description.—The dentition in Hexanchus is both monognathic disjunct, dignathic and gynandric heterodont. Teeth from the upper jaw are strongly labio-lingually compressed with a prominent main cusp that is slightly inclined towards the commissure, with a flat labial face and a convex lingual face. The mesial cutting edge of the main cusp is only partly preserved, but fine serration is visible. A single low distal cusplet is present and strongly inclined towards the commissure. The distal end of the tooth is missing, so it is unclear whether there was a second distal cusp or not. The root is high and wide and labio-lingually compressed.

  • Teeth from the lower jaw are strongly labio-lingually compressed with a distally inclined main cusp. The main cusp is serrated on the lower of its half mesial cutting edge and is either straight or slightly sigmoid mesially on the upper half. The distal cutting edge is convex. The distal cusplets are distally inclined with convex mesial and distal cutting edges. The maximal number of distal cusplets observed was five, but it was in a broken specimen with clear signs of having had more.

  • Remarks.—The teeth are not well preserved but do not differ significantly from those referred to H. microdon from the Late Cretaceous chalks and from the Fiskeler. Of the two Recent species, H. griseus (Bonnaterre, 1788) and H. nakamurai (Teng, 1962), the dentition of H. microdon closely resembles those of H. nakamurai in having lower teeth with lower crowns making them relatively wider than those of H. griseus (Herman, Hovestadt-Euler, Hovestadt, and Stehmann, 1994).

  • The name H. microdon is problematic as it is applied to almost any H. nakamurai-like Hexanchus from the Late Cretaceous and early Paleogene. In particular, in Morocco it is conventionally used for all Hexanchus specimens in the Maastrichtian, Paleocene, and early Eocene, whereas in NW Europe it is restricted to the Cretaceous and H. agassizi is used for Paleocene and early Eocene specimens. A revision is required but it is beyond the scope of this paper. Teeth of H. agassizi, as the name is currently used, differ from those of H. microdon by their smaller size. H. microdon differs from H. gracilis (Davis, 1887) mainly in having more distal cusplets, up to ten in H. microdon versus up to six in H. gracilis (Cappetta 1980). All these differences could be due to a combination of ontogenetic and sexual dimorphism.

  • Stratigraphic and geographic range.—Maastrichtian in northern Europe to the Ypresian in Morocco (Cappetta 1980, 1987).

  • Fig. 2.

    Synechodontiformes and Hexanchiformes from the Danian of Stevns Kridtbrud and Faxe Kalkbrud. AC. Synechodus faxensis (Davis, 1890). A. MGUH 1401, Type (Br2) anterior tooth in labial (A1) and lingual (A2) views. B. OESM-10046-16 (Br2) anterior tooth in labial view. C. OESM-10046-17 (Br2) lateral tooth in a juvenile in labial (C1) and lingual (C2) views. DG. Sphenodus lundgreni (Davis, 1890). D. MGUH1406, holotype (Br2) anterior lateral tooth in labial (D1), lingual (D2), and distal (D3) views, with magnification of folds (D4, D5, respectively). E. MGUH 29822 (Br2) anterior tooth in labial (E1), lingual (E2), and distal (E3) views. F. MGUH 29823 (Br2) lateral tooth in labial (F1), lingual (F2), and mesial (F3) views. G. MGUH 29824 (Br2) rare posterior tooth in labial (G1), lingual (G2), and mesial (G3) views. H, I. Hexanchus microdon (Agassiz, 1843). H. MGUH 29825 (Ce) fragment from a lower jaw tooth. I. MGUH 29826 (Ce) fragment from an upper jaw tooth in lingual view. J. Gladioserratus sp., MGUH 29827 (Br2) in lingual view. K, L. Heptranchias howelli Reed, 1946. K. OESM- 10046-14 (Br2) lower jaw tooth in labial (K1) and lingual (K2) views. L. OESM-10046-15 (Br2) upper jaw tooth in labial view. M. Notidanodon brotzeni Siverson, 1995, MGUH 1399 (Br2) crown of tooth.

    f02_313.jpg

    Genus Gladioserratus Underwood, Goswami, Prassad, Verma, and Flynn, 2011

  • Type species: Notidanus aptiensis Pictet, 1865; Aptian, Early Cretaceous, Apt, France.

  • Stratigraphic and geographic range.—Gladioserratus is known from the mid-late Cretaceous to possibly the early Eocene (if “N.seratissimus is included in the genus).

  • Gladioserratus sp.
    Fig. 2J.

  • Material.—Two almost complete specimens embedded in matrix (MGUH 29827, GMV2012-59) and four incomplete in a private collection, all collected from the Br2 in Faxe.

  • Description.—Labio-lingually compressed teeth with a triangular main cusp slanted towards the commissure and three cusplets distally diminishing in size. Mesial to the main cusp are five or six small mesial cusplets, which increase in size towards the main cusp. The distal part is missing in one tooth, but it does not appear to have had more than three cusplets. The root is compressed, with a convex mesial face (partly missing in the figured specimen). The basal edge of the root is also rounded, leaving a slightly triangular outline of the root in lingual view.

  • Remarks.—The teeth found in the quarry of Faxe are very similar to the teeth described by Siverson (1995: 5) and are presumable conspecific. Underwood et al. (2011) erected the new genus Gladioserratus to contain the Cretaceous species N. aptiensis (Pictet, 1865), distinguishing it from Notorhynchus by its lower and mesially “rounded” root and by having more massive cusps and an evenly mesial serration. The material from SNM is embedded in matrix and the thickness is difficult to estimate, but is presumably less than 3 mm, and two incomplete specimens in a private collection are both less than 2 mm thick. As noted by Underwood et al. (2011) the Scandinavian material lies somewhere between Gladioserratus and Notorynchus as the root is much like the former but the crown is more like the latter with its cockscomb-like serration. As material is limited, we refrain from erecting a new species and agree with Underwood et al. (2011) that more material is needed before such a decision can be made. Teeth of the early Eocene species Notorynchus seratissimus (Agassiz, 1843) more closely approach those of Gladioserratus than Recent Notorynchus and should probably be included in Gladioserratus. In particular they possess a similar mesially and distally rounded root profile as seen in Gladioserratus and have fewer distal cusplets than Recent teeth of Notorynchus. The mesial cusplets (cockscomb), however, resemble more closely those of Notorynchus in being distinct and increasing in size as they approach the main cusp. In this, they are similar to the Scandinavian material. This feature is much less developed in juvenile teeth, where the mesial cusplets are less developed or virtually absent as in G. aptiensis.

  • Genus Notidanodon Cappetta, 1975

  • Type species: Notidanus pectinatus Agassiz, 1843 from the white chalk (Cenomanian-Campanian) of Sussex, England.

  • Notidanodon brotzeni Siverson, 1995
    Fig. 2M.

  • 1977 Notidanus? loozi Vincent: Herman 1977; 99, pl. 3: 8a.

  • 1993 Notorhynchus seratissimus (Agassiz); Cvancara and Hoganson 1993: 3, fig. 2X, AA, non W, Z.

  • 1995 Notidanodon brotzeni sp. nov.; Siverson 1995: 6, fig. 2I.

  • Material.—A single partly preserved specimen (MGUH 1399) from the Br2 at Faxe and two fragmentary specimens in a private collection.

  • Description.—A labio-lingually compressed tooth with a main cusp and six mesial cusplets and six distal cusplets. The mesial cusplets increase in size towards the main cusp and are apico-distally directed with convex mesial cutting edges and concave distal cutting edges; the later feature dwindles toward the main cusp and the sixth mesial cusp has an almost straight distal cutting edge. The main cusp is inclined toward the commissure with a convex mesial cutting edge and a straight distal cutting edge. The two following distal cusplets after the main cusp have a similar morphology whereas the remaining cusplets appear to have a concave distal cutting edge mimicking the mesial cusplets. The crown-root boundary is apically convex. None of the teeth are preserved with roots.

  • Remarks.—Siverson (1995) differentiated N. brotzeni from N. loozi (Vincent 1876) on the basis of the distal cutting edge of both the mesial cusps, the main cusp and the distal cusplets. They are straight or concave in the former and convex in the latter. None of the material from Kazakhstan (Kordikova et al. 2001), New Zealand (Mannering and Hiller 2008) and France (Dutheil et al. 2006) that has been associated with N. brotzeni is sufficiently well preserved to be identified with absolute certainty as this species. An almost complete tooth illustrated by Floris (1979) from the Danish Paleocene appears unfortunately to have been lost. Teeth of N. brotzeni (or a very similar species) are fairly commonly collected from the Paleocene (presumed Selandian) of the Sidi Chenane mine, near Khouribga, Morocco (DJW, personal observation). The reference by Siverson (1995) to a fragment figured by Arambourg (1952) from the Danian of Morocco is therefore supported, but it is too fragmentary to refer to a species. The Cretaceous species of Notidanodon (N. lanceolatus, N. pectinatus, and N. dentatus) differ from the species from the Paleogene (N. brotzeni and N. loozi) by the reduced size of the mesial cusplets and by the more distally directed distal cusps. The morphology of the Paleocene species is much closer to Hexanchus than to the Cretaceous species. Whether or not the species N. brotzeni and N. loozi should be included within Notidanodon is a matter of debate because the lower teeth differ considerably from those of the type species, N. pectinatus (Agassiz 1843).

  • Stratigraphic and geographic range.—N. brotzeni is known from the middle Danian (early Paleocene) of Denmark (Faxe) and the contemporaneous Limhamn quarry in Southern Sweden (Siverson 1995) as well as from the Paleocene of Morocco (Arambourg 1952).

  • Family Heptranchidae Barnard, 1925
    Genus Heptranchias Rafinesque, 1810

  • Type species: Squalus perlo Bonnaterre, 1788; Recent in tropical to temperate seas. Mainly deep water, but can also occur in shallow water (Compagno et al. 2005).

  • Heptranchias howellii (Reed, 1946)
    Fig. 2K, L.

  • 1890 Notidanus microdon Agassiz: Davis 1890; 380, pl. 38: 5.

  • 1946 Notidanion howellii sp. nov.: Reed 1946; 1, figs. 1–4.

  • 1974 Heptranchias howellii Reed; Welton 1974, 7, pl. 2: A, B.

  • 2006 Heptranchias howelli Reed; Adnet 2006: 18, pl. 1: 3–8.

  • 2008 Heptranchias howelli Reed; Mannering and Hillier 2008: 1345, text-fig. 4A, B

  • 2009 Heptranchias howelli Reed; Bieńkowska-Wasiluk and Radwański 2009: 238, pl. 1: 1–5.

  • Material.—An almost complete lower antero-lateral tooth and an incomplete upper lateral tooth (OESM-10046-14, OESM-10046-15). Two incomplete lower antero- laterals and one upper anterior specimen are kept in a private collection, all collected from the Br2 in Faxe.

  • Description.—An upper lateral tooth (Fig. 2L), labio-lingually compressed with a long and acute strongly sigmoid main cusp, with mesial serration and a distal cusplet. The root has a rounded basal edge, but it is mesially damaged so the outline is uncertain.

  • The lower tooth (Fig. 2K) is strongly compressed labio- lingually with a strong triangular main cusp and six cusplets. The main cusp carries eight reduced mesial cusplets on the lower mesial face, increasing upwards in size. The first distal cusplet after the main csup is slightly lower than number two, three and four, but twice the size of number five. The sixth distal cusplet is very small. The root is tall and mesio-distally elongated with a slightly damaged basal edge.

  • Remarks.—The contemporaneous middle Danian Heptranchias sp. from the Limhamn quarry in Sweden (Siverson 1995) differs from the Faxe specimen by the presence of numerous reduced mesial cusplets in the latter. Numerous mesial cusplets are also present in another tooth held in the private collection of Alice Rasmussen in Faxe (JSA, personal observation). Since the teeth are of the same size, around 13 mm wide and appear to have been in the same position in the lower jaw, the differences can hardly be solely due to ontogeny. The tooth figured by Cappetta (1981) as H. howellii from the early Eocene of Morocco displays five poorly developed mesial cusplets, similar to the Faxe specimen. A further 10 specimens from Morocco of similar size (12–15 mm) in the DJW collection display between four and six reduced mesial cusplets, varying from poorly developed to robust. Lower Heptranchias teeth from the early Oligocene of Poland show a similar degree of variation (Bieńkowska- Wasiluk and Radwański 2009). Clearly the number and degree of development of mesial cusplets in lower teeth is not a reliable taxonomic character. Currently Heptranchias teeth are too intraspecifically variable to identify trends or groupings in order to separate them into separate species. In the lower teeth of the Recent H. perlo the mesial face of the main cusp carries one to five cusplets (Welton 1974) and it appears to have been the same in H. howellii (Reed 1946; Welton 1974; Adnet 2006) and in the Heptranchias sp. described by Waldman (1971). The Danian material from New Zealand (Mannering and Hiller 2008) is too poorly preserved for comparison.

  • Stratigraphic and geographic range.—Middle Danian (early Paleocene) of Denmark to early Oligocene of Poland (Bieńkowska- Wasiluk and Radwański 2009), Danian (early Paleocene) of New Zealand (Mannering and Hiller 2008), and the Eocene and Oligocene of Oregon, USA (Welton 1974).

  • Family Chlamydoselachidae Garman, 1884
    Genus Chlamydoselachus Garman, 1884

  • Type species: Chlamydoselachus anguineus Garman, 1884; Recent, globally northern hemisphere.

  • Stratigraphic and geographic range.—Chlamydoselachus is known from the Late Cretaceous, Campanian of Antarctica (Richter and Ward 1990) and Angola (Antunes and Cappetta 2002) to Recent.

  • Chlamydoselachus sp.
    Fig. 3A.

  • Material.—A single incomplete tooth (MGUH 29828) collected in the Ce in Stevns Kridtbrud.

  • Description.—Tooth with three elongated cups of almost equal length. The cusps are sigmoid in lateral view and rather divergent. The median cusp is slightly inclined toward the commissure, whereas the mesial and the distal cusp are at a 45° angle with the basal face of the root. The enameloid is smooth, but may have very small wide indistinct depressions at the base of the labial face of the cusps. The cutting edges do not reach the base of the crown and the enameloid is not continuous between the cusps. Both the labial and the lingual faces of the cusps are very convex. There is no sign of strong vertical folds on the main cusps and no sign of cusplets in between the main cusps. The root is badly preserved, but appears to be wide and low and lingually reduced. A transverse notch is visible in the basal face of the root. The tooth is 24 mm wide and 14 mm high. The tooth is probably a lateral tooth, as lateral teeth have divergent cusps, whereas anterior teeth have less divergent and more erect cusps (Pfeil 1983).

  • Remarks.—Fossil frilled sharks are poorly known, owing to the rarity of deep-water sediments where teeth can be recovered. However, owing to their unique morphology they are more likely to be described and figured than a lamniform tooth. Specimens are known from Antarctica (Richter and Ward 1990), Africa (Antunes and Cappetta 2002), Asia (Goto and Research 2004), New Zealand (Consoli 2009), North America (Welton 1979), and Europe (Davis 1887; Pfeil 1983; Adnet 2006; Fulgosi et al. 2009). The oldest known specimens are from the Campanian of Antarctica and Angola. Three different species were described from Angola by Antunes and Cappetta (2002) of which one species, C. gracilis, appears to be similar to Chlamydoselachus, whereas C. goliath is more reminiscent of the genus Proteothrinax (Pfeil 2012). The two genera were separated by Pfeil (1983) on the lack of intermediate cusplets between the main cusps, size and being less lingually inclined. Richter and Ward (1990) argued that differences between Thrinax (Proteothrinax) and Chlamydoselachus were within the variation of Chlamydoselachus and regarded it as a junior synonym of Chlamydoselachus. Both the first discovered fossil Chlamydoselachus (Lawley 1876) as well as C. gracilis described by Antunes and Cappetta (2002) and C. tatere (Consoli 2009) may lack intermediate cusplets and the lingual projection of the root appears to vary. This makes the basis for a separation into two genera quite unreliable. As specimens described as Proteothrinax may just be older and larger individuals of a sturdy Chlamydoselachus species, this is more a question of ontogenetic heterodonty than of different genera.

  • Order Squaliformes Goodrich, 1909
    Family Squalidae Blainville, 1816
    Genus Squalus Linnaeus, 1758

  • Type species: Squalus acanthias Linnaeus, 1758; Recent, temperate waters worldwide.

  • Squalus gabrielsoni Siverson, 1993b.
    Fig. 3B–E.

  • 1993 Squalus gabrielsoni sp. nov.; Siverson 1993b: 8, pl. 2: 1–8.

  • Material.—Six teeth from the Ce of Stevns Kridtbrud (MGUH 29829, MGUH 29830, GMV2012-60 [batch number]), two teeth and 13 fragments from the Br1 at Kulstirenden (MGUH 29831, MGUH 29832, GMV2012-61 [batch number]), and two teeth from the Br2 at Faxe (GMV2012-62).

  • Description.—The heterodonty in Squalidae is moderately monognathic. Monocuspid teeth show a cusp strongly declined towards the commissure and a long slightly irregular mesial cutting edge. The cusp is triangular and may be gently turned upward in males. The distal heel is long and convex, joining the cusp in a notch. The labial face of the crown is smooth and convex with median apron. The apron is elongated with parallel edges reaching well below the basal edge of the root. The lingual face of the crown is smooth with a prominent mesially twisted uvula. The labial face of the root is low, with several foramina below the crown-root junction. The basal face of the root is in general almost flat with the axial foramina fused into an infundibulum. Anterior and upper teeth are narrower and higher than lateral and posterior teeth. Teeth reaching up to 3 mm in width and 2 mm in height.

  • Remarks.—Differs from S. minor (Leriche 1902) in having irregular cutting edges and a more demarcated apron and from S. smithi (Herman 1982) in having an apron with almost parallel faces, whereas S. smithi has a triangular apron. S. crenatidens (Arambourg 1952) differs from S. gabrielsoni in the shape of the apron, which is triangular in the former and the strongly serrated cutting edge of S. crenatidens. The specimens depicted as S. minor by Case (1996) from the Paleocene of New Jersey, USA resemble the Danish material and may be conspecific. The separation of several species of Squalus is rather difficult owing to the very conservative morphology of the genus and ontogenetic heterodonty. In particular, the shape of the apron has been used as a character for defining species within Squalidae, which itself is subject to ontogenetic variation. The use of the fusion of the axial foramina into an infundibulum is also unreliable, as this appears to be a very variable character.

  • Stratigraphic and geographic range.—Mid-Maastrichtian (Siverson 1993b) to middle Danian of southern Scandinavia.

  • Fig. 3.

    Hexanchiformes, Squaliformes, and Squatiniformes from the Danian of Stevns Kridtbrud, Kulstirenden, and Faxe kalkbrud. A. Chlamydoselachus sp., MGUH 29828, DK635 (Ce) lateral tooth in labial (A1), lingual (A2), and distal (A3) views. BE. Squalus gabrielsoni Siverson, 1993. B. MGUH 29829 (Ce) lower anterior tooth in labial (B1) and lingual (B2) views. C. MGUH 29830 (Ce) lower lateral tooth in labial (C1) and lingual (C2) views. D. MGUH 29831 (Br1) lateral tooth in labial (D1) and lingual (D2) views. E. MGUH 29832 (Br1) lateral tooth in labial (E1) and lingual (E2) views. F. Squaliodalatias sp., MGUH 29833 (Ce) lateral tooth in labial view (F1), lingual (F2), and distal (F3) views. G, H. Centroscymnus praecursor Müller and Schöllmann, 1989. G. MGUH 29834 (Ce) lower tooth in labial (G1) and lingual (G2) views. H. MGUH 29835 (Ce) lower tooth in labial (H1) and lingual (H2) views. I, J. Squatina sp. I. MGUH 29836 (Ce) lateral tooth in labial (I1) and lingual (I2) views. J. MGUH 29837 (Ce) lateral tooth in labial (J1) and lingual (J2) views. K. Parasquatina cappettai Herman, 1982, MGUH 29838 (Ce) tooth in labial view (K1), lingual (K2), and distal (K3) views.

    f03_313.jpg

    Family Dalatiidae Gray, 1851
    Genus Squaliodalatias Adnet, Cappetta, and Reynders, 2006

  • Type species: Squaliodalatias weltoni Adnet, Cappetta, and Reynders, 2006; Lutetian (middle Eocene), southwest France.

  • Stratigraphic and geographic range.—Campanian (Late Creta ceous) of Lithuania (Dalinkevicius 1935), Paleocene of California (Welton 1978) and middle Eocene of France (Adnet 2006). Also probably in the Oligocene of California and Miocene of France and Slovakia; see Underwood and Schlogl (2013).

  • Squaliodalatias sp.
    Fig. 3F.

  • Material.—A single incomplete lower tooth from the Ce of Stevns Kridtbrud (MGUH 29833).

  • Description.—This tooth is strongly labio-lingually compressed, with a prominent principal cusp. The slightly triangular cusp has almost straight mesial cutting edge whereas the distal cutting edge is convex. The distal cutting edge and the small convex distal heel join into a notch. The labial face of the crown is slightly convex with a large and flat apron, the extremity of which is bifid, split by the labial marginal foramen and mesially delimited by the interlocking hollow. The lingual face is more convex than the labial face and the uvula is reduced to a small convexity in the crown-root junction. The mesial edge of the root is indented, the basal edge is damaged, but the labial marginal foramen is visible. The basal face of the root is large, labio-lingually concave and separated by the median lingual duct, which is connected to the median lingual foramen. The lingual face is limited to the minor transverse lingual bulge with the central foramen and a small mesio-lingual foramen. The distal lingual interlocking is apicobasally elongated and narrow. The tooth is 1.6 mm wide and 2.6 mm high.

  • Remarks.—Teeth described as Centrophorus (?) balticus by Dalinkevičius (1935) were referred to Squaliodalatias by Adnet et al. (2006) as were similar specimens from the Paleocene of California (Welton 1979). There are some differences between the specimens described here and the specimens described by Adnet (2006) and Adnet et al. (2006), Dalinkevičius (1935), and Welton (1979) and the assignment of the above mentioned specimens to the same genus is open to discussion, due to a lack of material.

  • Family Somniosidae Jordan, 1888
    Genus Centroscymnus Bocage and Capello, 1864

  • Type species: Centroscymnus coelolepis Bocage and Capello, 1864; Recent with a wide distribution, found in the Atlantic, Indian, and Pacific oceans.

  • Centroscymnus praecursor Müller and Schöllmann, 1989
    Fig. 3G, H.

  • 1989 Centroscymnus praecursor sp. nov.; Müller and Schöllmann 1989: 15, pl. 2: 2–8, pl. 5, figs. 6–8.

  • 1993 Centroscymnus praecursor Müller and Schöllmann; Thies and Müller 1993: 100, figs. 16, 17.

  • 2010 Centroscymnus praecursor Müller and Schöllmann; Hübner and Müller 2010: 440, fig. 3f–k.

  • Material.—Two lower teeth and five fragments from the Ce of Stevns Kridtbrud (MGUH 29834, MGUH 29835, GMV2012-63 [batch number]).

  • Description.—Teeth with moderate monognathic heterodonty and strongly dignathic heterodonty. Labio-lingually strongly compressed teeth in general rectangular and approximately twice as high as wide. The cusp is strongly inclined toward the commissure, with an irregular mesial cutting edge. The distal heel is short and convex joining the main cusp in a notch. The labial face of the crown is flat with a large flat apron. The lingual face of the crown is low and smooth. The labial face of the root is low with two pairs of marginal foramina on each side of the apron. The basal edge of the root is almost straight, and divided by a median notch. The basal face of the root is large, covering almost half of the entire tooth, and divided by the median lingual duct, which is connected to the median lingual foramen. The lingual face of the root is limited to the transverse bulge with the central foramen and a mesio-lingual foramen. The labial interlocking hollow is deep in the crown and decreases along the mesial face of the tooth, reaching almost the basal edge of the root. The lingual interlocking hollow is apically limited by the distal heel and reaches basally almost down to the basal edge of the root. Teeth reaching 2 mm in height and 1 mm in width.

  • Remarks.—Teeth of Centroscymnus praecursor are known from the Campanian of north-west Germany (Herman 1982; Müller and Schöllmann 1989). Whether the squaloids already were deep-water species in the early Late Cretaceous as stated by Klug and Kriwet (2010) is debated: although most living squaloids are deep-water, not all are (Compagno et al. 2005), nor are all the locations of fossil squaloids from deep-water facies (Siverson 1993b).

  • Stratigraphic and geographic range.—Campanian (Late Cretaceous) of North-West Germany (Herman 1982; Müller and Schöllmann 1989; Hübner and Müller 2010) to the Danian (early Paleocene) of Denmark.

  • Order Squatiniformes Buen, 1926
    Family Squatinidae Bonaparte, 1838
    Genus Squatina Duméril, 1806

  • Type species: Squalus squatina Linnaeus, 1758; Recent, North East Atlantic, Mediterranean, and Black Sea.

  • Squatina sp.
    Fig. 3I–J.

  • Material.—Four teeth collected from the Ce of Stevns Kridtbrud (MGUH 29836, MGUH 29837, GMV2012-64 [batch number]) and a few specimens in private collections from the Br2 of Faxe.

  • Description.—Monocuspid teeth with a long narrow elongated main cusp with continuous cutting edges. The shoulders are almost horizontal and long and low. The labial face of the crown is convex and smooth, with a well-demarcated apron that projects below the basal face of the root. The lingual face of the crown is strongly convex and smooth. The labial face of the root is low and wide and the basal face of the root is flat. The lingual face of the root has a protuberance with a foramen and several foramina below the crown-root junction on the shoulders. Teeth reaching 2.7 mm in height and 3 mm in width.

  • Remarks.—The separation of individual species of Squatina is extremely difficult (Dalinkevičius 1935; Cappetta 1987; Rees 2005). Squatina cranei (Woodward 1888) and S. decipiens (Dalinkevičius 1935) from the Late Cretaceous and earliest Paleocene were demonstrated to be synonyms (Guinot et al. 2012), the former being based on the teeth of juveniles and the latter, adults. This species demonstrates a higher degree of heterodonty than seen in Recent Squatina and was therefore placed in a separate subgenus, Cretascyllium Guinot et al. 2012. It is probable that these specimens belong to S. cranei, however, while evidence of the heterodonty is absent from these specimens, they are better left in open nomenclature.

  • Stratigraphic and geographic range.—Squatina ranges from the late Jurassic to Recent, Worldwide. It is most likely that it will be subdivided into separate genera or subgenera.

  • Genus Parasquatina Herman, 1982

  • Type species: Parasquatina cappettai Herman, 1982; Maastrichtian, Hemmoor North-West Germany.

  • Remarks.—Whether Parasquatina is a genus of Squatinidae is a matter of debate (see Guinot et al. 2012).

  • Parasquatina cappettai Herman, 1982
    Fig. 3K.

  • 1982 Parasquatina cappettai sp. nov.; Herman 1982: 132, text-fig. 1; pl. 1: 3; pl. 3: 2.

  • Material.—A single tooth from the Ce in Stevns Kridtbrud (MGUH 29838).

  • Description.—A monocuspid tooth, with the main cusp triangular and inclined towards the commissure and slightly distally twisted. The mesial shoulder is broader and more convex than the distal one. The labial face is smooth and convex, with a median protuberance that may be the remnants of an apron. The lingual face of the crown is smooth and very convex. The labial face of the root is low and the basal face is flat with a large central foramen. The lingual face of the root is high and broad with a protuberance with a central foramen. Three foramina are present below the mesial shoulder and a single foramen below the distal shoulder. It is not possible to confirm whether an uvula is present or not because of bioerosion.

  • Remarks.—Until the papers by Guinot et al. (2012) and Bourdon et al. (2011), Parasquatina was only known from Herman (1982) and in a short comment by Underwood and Ward (2008). Guinot et al. (2012) described two new species of Parasquatina; P. justinensis from the middle Turonian of France and P. jarvisi from the late Santonian of France and Britain. Guinot et al. (2012) separate P. justienensis from P. cappettai by the lack of a well-developed apron and the presence of a labial protuberance and more robust root branches in the latter and P. jarvisi from P. cappettai by a lesser marked cutting edge, a longer apron and stronger labial overhang. The specimen found in the Cerithium Limestone resembles the specimen depicted by Herman (1982) and is the youngest known Parasquatina specimen.

  • Stratigraphic and geographic range.—Late Cretaceous: mid-Turonian of France (Guinot et al. 2012), Santonian of England, France, and the USA (Underwood and Ward 2008; Bourdon et al. 2011; Guinot et al. 2012), late Maastrichtian of Germany (Herman 1982); Danian (early Paleocene) of Denmark.

  • Order Orectolobiformes Applegate, 1972
    Family Hemiscyllidae Gill, 1862
    Genus Hemiscyllium Smith, 1837

  • Type species: Squalus ocellatus Bonattere, 1788; Recent, New Guinea and Australia.

  • Hemiscyllium hermani Müller, 1989.
    Fig. 4A–E.

  • 1982 Hemiscyllium sp.; Herman 1982: 141, pl. 2: 4.

  • 1989 Hemiscyllium hermani sp. nov.; Müller, 1989: 35, pl. 7: 2–7.

  • Material.—28 teeth from the Ce of Stevns Kridtbrud (MGUH 29839, MGUH 29840, GMV2012-65 [batch number]) and eight teeth from the Br1 of Kulstirenden (MGUH 29841, MGUH 29842, MGUH 29843, GMV2012-66 [batch number]).

  • Description.—Dentition with monognathic heterodonty. Monocuspid teeth with a large crown and a triangular cusp. The cusp is elongated in anterior teeth and short in lateral and posterior teeth. The crown has a pair of prominent shoulders in anterior teeth whereas the shoulders are deflecting in lateral and posterior teeth. The labial face of the crown is flat and smooth and has a semicircular apron in anterior teeth, whereas it is often bifid in lateral and posterior teeth. The crown strongly overhangs the root. The lingual face of the crown is low and convex and may carry some short folds below the shoulders. The root is bilobed with widely diverging lobes. The basal face is flat with a foramen and the lingual face of the root is high with a median protuberance showing a small central foramen. One or several foramina may be present below the crown-root junction on the shoulders. Anterior teeth tend to be more symmetrical than lateral and posterior teeth and some anterior teeth may have small remnants of cusplets on the shoulders. Teeth reaching 1 mm in height and 0.8 mm in width.

  • Remarks.—It is not possible to make an informed comparison between this species and Hemiscyllium daimeriesi (Herman, 1972) due to the rarity and poor illustration of the later. Hemiscyllium bruxelliensi (Herman and Crochard, 1977) can be separated from H. hermani as the former is more massive and has lateral cusplets.

  • Stratigraphic and geographic range.—From Campanian and Maastrichtian (Late Creataceous) of North Germany (Herman 1982; Müller 1989) to Danian (early Paleocene) in Denmark.

  • Fig. 4.

    Orectolobiformes from the Danian of Stevns Kridtbrud, Kulstirenden, and Faxe kalkbrud. AE. Hemiscyllium hermani Müller, 1989. A. MGUH 29839 (Ce) anterior tooth in labial (A1), lingual (A2), and lateral (A3) views. B. MGUH 29841 (Br1) anterior tooth in labial (B1) and lingual (B2) views. C. MGUH 29840 (Ce) lateral tooth in labial (C1), lingual (C2), and lateral (C3) views. D. MGUH 29842 (Br1) lateral tooth in labial (D1) and lingual (D2) views. E. MGUH 29843 (Br1) posterior tooth in labial (E1) and lingual (E2) views. FH. Pararhincodon groessenssi Herman, 1982. F. MGUH 29844 (Ce) anterior tooth in labial (F1) and lingual (F2) views. G. MGUH 29845 Ce) anterior tooth in labial (G1) and lingual (G2) views. H. MGUH 29846 (Ce) lateral tooth

    f04_313.jpg

    Family Parascyllidae Gill, 1862
    Genus Pararhincodon Herman, 1977

  • Type species: Pararhincodon crochardi Herman, 1974; upper Campanian, South-West Belgium.

  • Pararhincodon groessenssi Herman, 1982
    Fig. 4F–H.

  • 1982 Pararhincodon groessenssi sp. nov.; Herman, 1982: 143, pl. 2: 9, pl. 4: 2, 3.

  • Material.—12 teeth from the Ce in Stevns Kridtbrud (MGUH 29844, MGUH 29845, MGUH 29846, GMV2012-67).

  • Description.—Dentition with monognathic heterodonty. Very small teeth with a prominent elongated main cusp, which is slightly inclined towards the commissure in anterior teeth, whereas it is strongly so in lateral teeth. The crown is small and convex with a pair of small shoulders. The shoulders carry short strong folds, whereas the cusp and remaining crown is smooth. The lingual face of the crown is very convex and smooth. The root is slightly asymmetric in anterior teeth, but is much more so in lateral teeth. The root is bilobed, with the mesial lobe in general being longer than the distal, except in anterior teeth. The basal face is flat and the lingual face of the root is high. The lingual face bears a protuberance with central foramina. Foraminae are present lingually below the crown-root junction in each of the shoulders. Anterior teeth appear fairly symmetrical whereas the lateral teeth are strongly asymmetrical. In lateral teeth the distal shoulder carries a small cusplet. Teeth reaching 1.0 mm in height and 0.5 mm in width.

  • Remarks.—These teeth can be separated from the Cretaceous P. crochardi (Herman, 1977) and P. lehmani (Cappetta, 1980) and the Ypresian species P. ypresiensis (Cappetta, 1976) and P. germaini (Adnet, 2006) by being ornamented. All other species of Pararhincodon possess smooth teeth. The difference probably does not allow separation at the generic level. The species P. bilizi described by Reinecke and Engelhard (1997) is very similar to Microscyliorhinus leggetti (Case, 1994) and may be conspecific with the latter.

  • Stratigraphic and geographic range.—Campanian and Maastrichtian (Late Cretaceous) of North Germany (Herman 1982) to the Danian (early Paleocene) of Denmark and possibly also the Campanian (Late Cretaceous) of Texas (Welton and Farish 1993).

  • Family Ginglymostomatidae Gill, 1862
    Genus Delpitoscyllium Noubhani and Cappetta, 1997

  • Type species: Ginglymostoma africanum Leriche, 1927.

  • Delpitoscyllium planum (Davis, 1890)
    Fig. 5A–E.

  • 1890 Scyllium planum sp. nov.; Davis 1890: 383, pl. 38: 9.

  • Material.—Davis' specimen from Terkelskov, Denmark (MGUH 1400), further four specimens from Faxe (OESM- 10046-19, OESM-10046-20, OESM-10046-21, OESM- 10046-22), and additional specimens in the collection of Alice Rasmussen, Faxe (Br2).

  • Description.—Symmetrical teeth with a prominent main cusp flanked by one to two pairs of cusplets. The teeth are sigmoidal in lateral view and the furrows between the cusplets and the main cusps create a median labial depression in the crown. The apron is weakly bifid and strongly overhangs the root.

  • In anterior teeth the crown is longer than wide with only one pair of converging cusplets, whereas lateral teeth are wider and the cusplets are either erect or diverging. Posterior teeth have a second pair of small cusplets and the crown becomes progressively wider and slightly asymmetrical. Both the labial and the lingual faces are smooth and convex, the lingual face particularly so. In none of the specimens is the root preserved. The lingual face has a well-developed median protuberance

  • Remarks.—Noubhani and Cappetta (1997) erected a new genus, Delpitoscyllium, for the species Ginglymostoma africanum Leriche, 1927 due to the lower number of cusps, “not exceeding two pairs” and a median labial keel on the main cusp. Though lacking the keel, present in the Moroccan material, we have transferred Scyllium planum Davis, 1890 to this genus. D. planum is regarded as a separate species and it is separated from the partly coeval species Delpitoscyllium africanum by the presence of a median keel on the apex of the labial crown. It could be that this character is variable among populations and that the two species of Delpitoscyllium are synonymous, in which case D. planum (Davis, 1890) is the senior synonym.

  • Amongst the Moroccan material depicted by Arambourg (1952: pl. 22: 8), there is a wide posterior tooth similar to what is observed in the Danish material. The median keel is present in specimens from the French Thanetian figured by Moreau and Mathis (2000).

  • Stratigraphic and geographic range.—Currently only recorded from the Danian (early Paleocene) of Denmark.

  • Order Heterodontiformes Berg, 1937
    Family Heterodontidae Gray, 1851
    Genus Heterodontus Blainville, 1816

  • Type species: Squalus philippi Schneider, 1801; Recent, South Australia.

  • Heterodontus rugosus (Agassiz, 1843)
    Fig. 5F–H.

  • 1843 Acrodus rugosus sp. nov.; Agassiz 1843: t. 3, 148, pl. 22: 28, 29. 1889 Cestracion rugosus Agassiz; Woodward 1889: 335.

  • 1964 Heterodontus rugosus Agassiz; Albers and Weiler 1964: 7, fig. 41a–c.

  • 1977 Heterodontus rugosus Agassiz; Herman 1977: 90, pl. 3: 5.

  • Material.—20 incomplete teeth from the Ce of Stevns Kridtbrud (MGUH 29848, MGUH 29849, MGUH 29850, GMV2012-68 [batch number]).

  • Description.—Dentition with strong ontogenetic heterodonty and disjunct monognathic heterodonty. Anterior teeth with six short and apical rounded cusps of lateral decreasing size. The lower crown of the labial face and the cusps are at an oblique angle to each other and whereas the cusps are smooth the lower crown has a strongly puckered ornamentation. The apron is broad and semicircular. The lingual face of the crown is smooth and convex, with a medio-lingual protuberance. The root is bilobed and slightly asymmetrical. The basal face is flat with a central foramen. The lingual face of the root has a protuberance and there is a foramen in each side of the lingual protuberance.

  • Lateral teeth are mesio-distally elongated, with a transverse crest. The transverse crest may have a cusp in anterior- lateral teeth. The labial face is more coarsely ornamented and steeper than the finer ornamented lingual face. The roots are missing in almost all of the lateral teeth, but appear to have been low and basally flat.

  • Remarks.—In Recent Heterodontus, there is strong ontogenetic heterodonty in all files but it is particularly evident in anterior files where the teeth undergo a reduction in lateral cusplets and likewise in the posterior teeth which loses their cusps and aquires a crushing morphology (Reif 1976). This is evident in the sampled anterior teeth, indicating the presence of both juveniles and adults. Reif (1976) divided Recent Heterodontus into two groups based on their dentitions. The H. portusjacksoni group possess several files of low-crowned inflated lateral files with a straight, poorly developed carina. The H. francisci group possess narrower lateral teeth with a centrally placed, often sigmoidal carina, and a low centrally placed cusp and coarse ornamentation. According to this scheme, H. rugosus would belong to the H. francisci group.

  • Stratigraphic and geographic range.—Late Cretaceous: Campanian of France and Germany (Thies and Müller 1993; Vullo 2005) and Campanian and Maastrichtian of Belgium (Agassiz 1843; Herman 1977; Bless et al. 1991) to the Danian (early Paleocene) of Denmark.

  • Fig. 5.

    Orectolobiformes and Heterodontiformes from the Danian of Stevns Kridtbrud, Kulstirenden, Faxe kalkbrud, and Terkelskov Kalkværk. AE. Delpitoscyllium planum (Davis, 1890). A. MGUH 1400, holotype (Br2) anterior tooth in labial (A1), basal (A2), and lateral (A3) views. B. OESM-10046-20 (Br2) anterior tooth in labial (B1), basal (B2), and lateral (B3) views. C. OESM-10046-21 (Br2) anterior tooth in labial (C1), basal (C2), and lateral (C3) views. D. OESM-10046-19 (Br2) lateral tooth in labial (D1), basal (D2), and lateral (D3) views. E. OESM-10046-22 (Br2) posterior tooth in labial (E1), basal (E2), and lateral (E3) views. FH. Heterodontus rugosus (Agassiz 1843). F. MGUH 29848 (Ce) anterior tooth in labial (F1), lingual (F2), and lateral (F3) views. G. MGUH 29849 (Ce) lateral tooth in occlusal view. H. MGUH 29850 (Ce) lateral tooth in labial (H1), occlusal (H2), and lateral (H3) views. I, J. Heterodontus sp. I. MGUH 298451 (Br2) anterior tooth in labial view. J. OESM-10046-13 (Br2) lateral tooth in occlusal view.

    f05_313.jpg

    Heterodontus sp.
    Fig. 5I, J.

  • Material.—Anterior and lateral tooth from the Br2 at Faxe (MGUH 298451, OESM-10046-13).

  • Description.—The anterior tooth is poorly preserved. It has a single rounded principal cusp and a single mesial cusplet and two distal cusplets, the more distal being very small. The labial crown base is only slightly ornamented. The lateral tooth bears a long straight carina, no central cusp, and is ornamented by a series of fine ridges originating from the carina and passing at right angles across the crown.

  • Remarks.—This large tooth, which probably represents an undescribed species, despite having a distinct carina, is closer to the H. portusjacksoni grouping in ornamentation, consisting of fine striae rather than large pits. It is similar in morphology to the Late Cretaceous species H. lonzeensis (Herman, 1977) and less inflated than the Paleocene species H. lerichei (Casier, 1943). Case and Borodin (2000) published a new species H. elongatus from the middle Eocene of North Carolina (USA), which shares a similar morphology, with a faint ornamentation on the anterior teeth, but with less distinct ridges on the lateral teeth.

  • Order Lamniformes Berg, 1958
    Family Carchariidae Jordan and Gilbert, 1883

  • Remarks.—Recent molecular studies have suggested that Odontaspis and Carcharias are only distantly related (Naylor et al. 1997; Vélez-Zuazo and Agnarsson 2011). Thus we have reverted to the Family Carchariidae Jordan and Gilbert, 1883.

  • Genus Carcharias Rafinesque, 1810

  • Type species: Carcharias taurus Rafinesque, 1810; Recent, warm-temperate to tropical waters.

  • Stratigraphic and geographic range.—Campanian (Late Creta ceous) of Sweden to the Danian (early Paleocene) of Denmark (Davis 1890; Siverson 1995), Maastrichtian (Late Cretaceous) of Spain (Cappetta and Corral 1999), and possibly the Ypresien-Lutetien (Eocene) of France (Adnet 2006).

  • Carcharias aff. gracilis (Davis, 1890)
    Fig. 6A–C.

  • Material.—Five teeth from the Ce of Stevns Kridtbrud (MGUH 298452, MGUH 29853, MGUH 29854, GMV2012- 69, GMV2012-70) and two in from the Br2 of Faxe in a private collection (Alice Rasmussen, Faxe).

  • Description.—The dentition in Carcharias displays both a monognathic and dignathic heterodonty. The main cusp is prominent and elongate, flanked by a pair of tall acute cusplets, which may or may not be divergent. Both the labial and lingual faces are generally smooth with the exception of the labial crown-root boundary which may carry short, strong folds. A median sulcus is present in the basal part of the crown above the dental band in both anteriors and laterals. In all teeth, the main cusp is interconnected with the cusplets and a continuous cutting edge extends over all cusps. The root is bilobed with short rounded lobes and has a median lingual protuberance divided by a deep nutrient groove.

  • Remarks.—The type series of C. gracilis (Davis 1890) are poorly preserved. Siverson (1995) figured better preserved specimens; C. gracilis is, however, still poorly defined. None of the specimens from the Ce and the Br carry lingual folds, which are common in the Moroccan C. whitei (Arambourg 1952), and this explains why we cannot assign the collected specimens to this species. Case (1996) depicted several specimens of Carcharias teretidens (Sylvestrilamia teretidens) which are similar to the specimens from Denmark. The latter, however, tend to be much smaller than the teeth from New Jersey. There is still disagreement around the fossil species of Carcharias, and especially about the use of the Recent genus Carcharias in the late Mesozoic and early Paleogene. Some Late Cretaceous species have been transferred to Eostriatolamia (Glickman 1980), but the whole fossil Odontaspidae is generically more diverse than suggested in the current literature and is in a dire need of revision. Until then, our specimens will be kept within Carcharias sensu lato.

  • Genus Striatolamia Glickman, 1964

  • Type species: Otodus macrotus Agassiz, 1843, Eocene of France.

  • Striatolamia cederstroemi Siverson, 1995
    Fig. 6D–H.

  • 1995 Striatolamia cederstroemi sp. nov.; Siverson 1995: 9, fig. 3K–P. See Siverson (1995) for further synonomy.

  • Material.—Five specimens (OESM-10046-5, OESM-10046- 6, OESM-10046-11, OESM-10046-12, OESM- 10046-18) and several others in a private collection (Alice Rasmussen, Faxe), all from the Br2 of Faxe.

  • Description.—Teeth with an elongated main cusp, strongly sigmoid in anteriors, less so in laterals. Cusplets are only present in anterior teeth where they are small and blunt, often with an entirely flattened apex. In lateral teeth, the cusplets are lacking and instead the shoulders are mesio-distally very well developed. Both faces of the crown are in general smooth, but loose smaller cusps found at the same locality with similar affinity carry lingual folds. The root is low and bilobed and has elongated lobes. The lingual face of the root has a prominent median protuberance with a nutrition groove.

  • Remarks.—S. cederstroemi differs from S. striata by being smooth or lightly lingually striated and having more narrow root extremities, whereas the latter has strong lingual folds and wider root lobes.

  • Siverson (1995) tentatively assigned Striatolamia to Mitsukurinidae, a position that has been followed by Cappetta and Nolf (2005) and Cappetta (2012). He based his opinion on the similarity of the teeth of Striatolamia to those of a generalised Anomotodon. However, Siverson (1995: 9) also stated “I am not completely convinced that the latter genus [Anomotodon] is a true mitsukurinid taxon, hence the assignment of Striatolamia to Mitsukurinidae in a broad sense”. Cunningham (2000), using an artificial tooth set, conducted a detailed, position-by-position comparison of the teeth of Striatolamia macrota (Agassiz, 1843) with those of Recent Carcharias taurus. His data demonstrated a very close similarity between the two, closer than between Recent Carcharias and Odontaspis. On the basis of its dental similarity to C. taurus, we prefer to group Striatolamia with Carcharias in the Carchariidae.

  • Stratigraphic and geographic range.—Striatolamia cederstroemi is only known from the Danian (early Paleocene) of Denmark and Sweden.

  • Fig. 6.

    Lamniformes from the Danian of Stevns Kridtbrud, Karlstrup kalkgrav, and Faxe kalkbrud. AC. Carcharias aff. gracilis (Davis, 1890). A. MGUH 29852 (Ce) anterior tooth in labial view. B. MGUH 29853 (Ce) anterior tooth in labial (B1) and lingual (B2) views. C. MGUH 29854 (Ce) anterior tooth in labial (C1) and lingual (C2) views. DH. Striatolamia cederstroemi Siverson, 1995. D. OESM-10046-5 (Br2) anterior tooth in labial (D1) and lingual (D2) views. E. OESM-10046-6 (Br2) anterior tooth in labial (E1) and lingual (E2) views. F. OESM-10046-18 (Br2) anterior tooth in lateral (F1), labial (F2), and lingual (F3) views. G. OESM-10046-12 (Br2) lateral tooth in labial (G1) and lingual (G2) views. H. OESM-10046-11 (Br2) lateral tooth in labial (H1) and lingual (H2) views. I. Odontaspis speyeri Dartevelle and Casier, 1943, OESM-10046-8 (Br2) anterior tooth in labial (I1) and lingual (I2) views. JL. Palaeohypotodus aff. bronni (Agassiz, 1843). J. MGUH 29855 (Ce) anterior tooth in labial (J1), basal (J2), and lateral (J3) views. K. MGUH 298457 (Br1) lower anterior tooth in labial (K1), lingual (K2) views. L. MGUH 29856 (Ce) posterior tooth in labial (L1) and lingual (L2) views.

    f06_313.jpg

    Family Odontaspididae Muller and Henle, 1839
    Genus Palaeohypotodus Glickman, 1964

  • Type species: Lamna (Odontaspis) bronni Agassiz, 1843; Maastrichtian of Maastricht, the Netherlands.

  • Palaeohypotodus aff. bronni (Agassiz, 1843)
    Fig. 6J–L.

  • Material.—One anterior and one posterior tooth from the Ce of Stevns Kridtbrud (MGUH 29855, MGUH 29856) and one anterior tooth from the Br1 of Karlstrup kalkgrav (MGUH 298457).

  • Description.—An anterior tooth with a strongly elongated erect main cusp flanked by a pair of small but thick, acute, inwardly twisted cusplets. The labial face of the crown is convex and smooth with a large triangular sulcus originating from the base of the main cusp and reaching almost a third of the cusp length. The lingual face is strongly convex and smooth without any signs of folds or ornamentation. The crown is slightly sigmoid in lateral view and the cutting edge is prominent and reaches the base of the cusp, but is not continuous with the cusplets. The root is almost absent and cannot provide any useful information. The tooth measures 28 mm in height and 15 mm in width. Posterior teeth are low, with a triangular cusp and cusplets and carry strong irregular folds at the crown-root boundary.

  • Remarks.—These teeth correspond reasonably to those of Palaeohypotodus. Maastrichtian teeth of P. bronnii (Agassiz 1843) often have basal striation or folds on the labial crown base and often two pairs of cusplets. However, the latter has not been observed in these specimens. Because of this, and the limited material, this determination must be regarded as tentative. The genus Palaeohypotodus is kept within Odontaspididae, following Cappetta (1987, 2012).

  • Stratigraphic and geographic range.—Maastrichtian (Late Cretaceous) of northern Spain (Kriwet et al. 2007), the Paris Basin (Priem 1897), Belgium, the Netherlands (Agassiz 1843; Herman 1977; Geyn 1937b), and the north of Germany (Herman 1982) to the Danian (early Paleocene) of Denmark.

  • Genus Odontaspis Agassiz, 1838

    • Type species: Squalus ferox Risso, 1810; Recent.

    Odontaspis speyeri Dartevelle and Casier, 1943
    Figs. 6I, 7A, B.

  • 1943 Odontaspis speyeri sp. nov.; Dartevelle and Casier 1943: 146, pl. 4: 1–13.

  • See Siverson (1995: 7), for additional synonomy.

  • Material.—Three teeth (OESM-10046-7, OESM-10046-8, OESM-10046-10) and several others in a private collection, all from the Br2 in Faxe.

  • Description.—Elongated teeth with a prominent main cusp flanked by one to two pairs of small hook-shaped cusplets. The main cusp is very elongated and strongly convex on both the labial and lingual face. The faces are smooth, with no signs of ornamentation. The first pair of cusplets are larger than the second pair and both pairs are connected with the main cusp. The crown-root boundary appears in general to be smooth with only some bulking in anterior teeth. The cutting edge reaches the base of the crown and connects with the cusplets. The roots are bilobed and have elongate and tapered extremities. The basal face of the root is flat and the root has a well-developed lingual protuberance.

  • Remarks.—O. speyeri has been described from West Africa (Dartevelle and Casier 1943) and Morocco (Arambourg 1952) and is characterized by its smooth faces and small twisted lateral cusplets. The teeth collected at Faxe are very close to the size and morphology of the specimens depicted by Arambourg (1952).

  • Stratigraphic and geographic range.—Odontaspis speyeri appears to have had a fairly wide distribution as it is known from West Africa (Dartevelle and Casier 1943), Morocco (Arambourg 1952; Cappetta 1987) and in Scandinavia during the Paleocene (Siverson 1995).

  • Family Otodontidae Glickman, 1964
    Genus Cretalamna Glickman, 1958

  • Type species: Otodus appendiculatus Agassiz, 1843; Turonian of Lewes, England.

  • Cretalamna appendiculata (Agassiz, 1843)
    Fig. 7C–I.

  • 1843 Otodus appendiculatus sp. nov.; Agassiz 1843: 270, pl. 32: 10.

  • 1889 Lamna appendiculata (Agassiz); Woodward 1889: 392.

  • 1958 Cretalamna appendiculata (Agassiz); Glickman 1958: 530.

  • Material.—One incomplete specimen from the Ce of Stevns Kridtbrud (MGUH 29858) and numerous teeth from the Br2 of Faxe at the SNM (MGUH 29858, MGUH 29859, MGUH 29860, MGUH1408, GM1992-1 to 6, GM1992-16, GM1992-17) and at Østsjællands Museum in Faxe (OESM- 10046-3, OESM-10046-2, OESM-10046-4) and in private collections. A majority are, however incomplete.

  • Description.—Teeth with a broad triangular main cusp, erected in anterior and lower laterals and slanted toward the commissure in upper laterals. The main cusp is elongate and broad, with a convex labial face and convex at the crownroot boundary lingually and tends to flatten apically. Both faces are smooth, with the only exception of the median basal part of the labial face, which displays one or two deep vertical furrows. The cutting edges are continuous down to the base of the main cusp and may be continuous in the lateral cusp, but rarely so in upper laterals. The teeth appear to be slightly labio-lingually curved or flat, with the exception of anteriors, which can be slightly sigmoid in lateral view. The cusplets are often triangular and are either erect or divergent depending on their dental position in the mouth. A few teeth display a small denticle at the lateral extremities, but this is not common. The remaining cusplet is triangular and diverging from the main cusp. The root is only partly preserved, but was bilobed with short rounded lobes. There is a deep basal concavity and the basal face appears to have been flat. The largest specimen, a lower lateral, measured 45 mm in height.

  • Remarks.—Cretalamna appendiculata is a very long-ranging species, known from the Albian of the Anglo-Franco-Belgian basin to the Lower Eocene of Morocco and with a wide distribution. It is evident that in its current usage it comprises several lineages and a number of species (Underwood and Cumbaa 2010; Underwood et al. 2011). The high crowned anterior teeth (Fig. 7C, D) closely resemble those from the Maastrichtian of Kanne, Belgium, figured by Herman (1977: pl. 9: 3a, b) as C. appendiculata var. pachyrhiza. However, the more lateral teeth (Fig. 7G–I) appear more robust than those figured by Herman (1977) and may represent an undescribed species. In the light of this, we use the name C. appendiculata in a loose sense, pending a revision and cannot make any accurate conclusions on its specific distribution and evolution.

  • The spelling of Cretolamna or Cretalamna has been discussed by Siverson (1999: 59) and although Glickman (1958: 570) did spell the name Cretalamna, Cappetta (2012) suggests Cretolamna should be used to avoid confusion, an opinion which we have chosen not to follow here.

  • Stratigraphic and geographic range.—Cretalamna appendiculata sensu lato occurs in Late Cretaceous: Japan (Goto et al. 1996), Cenomanian of Spain (Vullo et al. 2009), Santonian and Campanian of Georgia (Case et al. 2001), Campanian of Delaware (Lauginiger and Hartstein 1983), Cenomanian, Campanian-Maastrichtian of Southern France (Vullo 2005; Vullo et al. 2007), Northern Spain (Kriwet et al. 2007), and Germany (Hübner and Müller 2010), Maastrichtian of Madagascar (Gottfried et al. 2001). Selandian (early Paleocene) of New Jersey (Case 1996) and Denmark.

  • Fig. 7.

    Lamniformes from the Danian of Stevns Kridtbrud and Faxe kalkbrud. A, B. Odontaspis speyeri Dartevelle and Casier, 1943. A. OESM-10046-7 (Br2) anterior tooth in labial (A1), lingual (A2), and lateral (A3) views. B. OESM-10046-10 (Br2) lower lateral tooth in labial (B1) and lingual (B2) views. CI. Cretalamna appendiculata (Agassiz, 1843) . C. MGUH1408 (Br2) anterior tooth in labial (C1) and lingual (C2) views. D. MGUH 29858 (Ce) anterior tooth in labial (D1), lingual (D2), and lateral (D3) views. E. OESM-10046-3 (Br2) anterior tooth in labial (E1), lingual (E2), and lateral (E3) views. F. MGUH 29859 (Br2) lower lateral tooth in labial view. G. OESM-10046-2 (Br2) upper lateral tooth in labial (G1), lingual (G2), and distal (G3) views. H. MGUH 29860 (Br2) lower lateral tooth in labial (H1), lingual (H2), and distal (H3) views. I. OESM-10046-4 (Br2) upper posterior tooth in labial (I1), lingual (I2), and distal (I3) views.

    f07_313.jpg

    Order Carcharhiniformes Compagno, 1977
    Family Scyliorhinidae Gill, 1862
    Genus Scyliorhinus Blainville, 1816

  • Type species: Squalus canicula Linnaeus, 1758; Recent, Northeast Atlantic, Mediterranean, Canary Islands, and Ivory Coast.

  • Remark.—Many fossil sharks have been affiliated with modern genera with which they have most in common. This is, however, not always desirable, besides having genera ranging for more than 60 Myr, and in the case of Scyliorhinus our knowledge of the inter- and intraspecific variation is limited. This leaves us with the choice of either assigning fossil species to a modern genus or erecting a new genus to contain the fossils with morphology close to a modern genus. Either solution is undesirable and has taxonomic repercussions. We have here continued to use the Recent genus Scyliorhinus in its wide, traditional palaeontological sense, but in quotation marks, rather than to erect new fossil genera prematurely. This problem was aired by Müller and Diedrich (1991) who saw the use of Scyliorhinus as a last resort rather than to be a desirable solution.

  • Fig. 8.

    Carcharhiniformes from the Danian of Stevns Kridtbrud and Kulstirenden. AF. “Scyliorhinuselongatus (Davis, 1887). A. MGUH 29861 (Ce) anterior tooth in labial (A1), lingual (A2), and lateral (A3) views. B. MGUH 29862 (Ce) anterior tooth in labial (B1), lingual (B2), and lateral (B3) views. C. MGUH 29863 (Ce) lateral tooth in labial (C1) and lingual (C2) views. D. MGUH 29864 (Ce) lateral tooth in labial (D1) and lingual (D2) views. E. MGUH 29865 (Ce) lateral tooth in labial (E1) and lingual (E2) views. F. MGUH 29866 (Ce) posterior tooth in labial (F1) and lingual (F2) views. GI. “Scyliorhinusbiddlei Halter, 1995. G. MGUH 29867 (Ce) anterior tooth in labial (G1) and lingual (G2) views. H. MGUH 29868 (Ce) lateral tooth in labial (H1), lingual (H2), and lateral (H3) views. I. MGUH 29869 (Br1) lateral tooth in labial (I1) and lingual (I2) views. J, K. Crassescyliorhinus germanicus (Herman, 1982). J. MGUH 29870 (Ce) lateral tooth in labial (J1) and lingual (J2) views. K. MGUH 29871 (Br1) anterior tooth in labial (K1) and lingual (K2) views.

    f08_313.jpg

    Scyliorhinuselongatus (Davis, 1887)
    Fig. 8A–F.

  • Material.—41 teeth from the Ce of Stevns Kridtbrud (MGUH 29861–29866, GMV2012-71 [batch number]), 35 specimens from the Br1 of Kulstirenden (GMV2012-72 [batch number]), and a few in a private collection from the Br2 of Faxe. The majority are fragmentary.

  • Description.—Teeth with a high degree of monognathic heterodonty. Anterior teeth are robust, taller than wide with a prominent main cusp flanked by a pair of cusplets. Lateral teeth are lower and wider. The main cusp is biconvex and with a convex labial face and a very strongly convex lingual face. The cusplets are acute and converging towards the main cusp. Anterior teeth have vertical folds on the cusplets and on the lingual face of the main cusp, whereas lateral teeth also carry vertical folds on the main cusp, both labial and lingual. The crown-root boundary of the main cusp is labially indented. The root is low labially and bilobed with a flat basal face. The lingual face of the root is more prominent than the labial with a strong protuberance with a median foramen. Lingually, below the cusplets, is a foramen present. Posterior teeth are low crowned with up to two pairs of cusplets covered with vertical folds. There is no indentation at the median crown-root junction and in general the posterior teeth are more mesio-distally elongated than teeth from other jaw positions. Teeth reaching 2.4 mm in height and 2.0 mm in width.

  • Remarks.—Cappetta (1980), in his re-description of the fossils from Sahel Alma (Lebanon), had several specimens at different ontogenetic stages, but he did not mention teeth with more than one pair of cusplets. However, female and juvenile teeth of the Recent S. canicula frequently have more than one pair of cusplets in more lateral files (Ellis and Shackley 1995). This can also be observed in S. stellaris (JSA, personal observation). S. elongatus is long ranging both from a stratigraphical and a geographic point of view and may represent a species group rather than a single species, much in the same way as Cretalamna appendiculata.

  • Stratigraphic and geographic range.—Late Cretaceous: Santonian of Lebanon (Davis 1887; Cappetta 1980), Campanian of England, France, and Belgium (Herman 1977; Vullo 2005; Underwood and Ward 2008) to the late Maastrichtian Morocco (Noubhani and Cappetta 1997) and the Danian (early Paleocene) of Denmark.

  • Scyliorhinusbiddlei Halter, 1995
    Fig. 8G–I.

  • 1995 Scyliorhinus biddlei sp. nov.; Halter 1995: 77, pls. 1–5, text-figs. 8–10.

  • Material.—22 specimens from the Ce of Stevns Kridtbrud (MGUH 29867, MGUH 29868, GMV2012-73 [batch number]) and six from the Br1 at Kulstirenden (MGUH 29869, GMV2012-74 [batch number]).

  • Description.—Teeth belonging to this species display monognathic heterodonty. Anterior teeth have an elongated biconvex main cusp slightly inclined towards the commissure. The labial face is smooth and convex with some short folds below the shoulders at the crown-root junction. The base of the crown overhangs the root and is deeply indented medially. The shoulders are both inclined labially. The lingual face of the crown is strongly convex and carries folds almost up to the apex of the main cusp, with the most prominent folds being below the shoulders. Roots are missing in all anterior teeth.

  • Lateral teeth have a prominent elongate main cusp declining towards the commissure and a small distal cusplet. The labial face is convex and smooth, with the exception of the crown-root junction and at the shoulders, which carries short strong vertical folds. The crown overhangs the root. The lingual face of the crown is strongly convex and carries several longitudinal folds on the main cusp and a more reticulated ornamentation on the shoulders. The labial face of the root is low with multiple foramina. The root is bilobed with a flat basal face and a prominent lingual protuberance. There are multiple foramina below the shoulders on the lingual face of the root and foramina in the lingual protuberance. Teeth reaching up to 1.2 mm in height and 1.2 mm in width.

  • Remarks.—In his description of the type, Halter (1995) states that young individuals have lingual folds on their crowns reaching almost the apex, which is the case for many of our specimens and they are also in general smaller than the specimens described by Halter (1995) (2 mm high and 1.5 mm wide). This suggests that the specimens from Stevns Kridtbrud may have been from juveniles to sub-adults. Interestingly enough, anterior teeth are almost always missing the root, whereas this is not the case of the laterals.

  • Stratigraphic and geographic range.—Scyliorhinus biddlei is known from the Maastrichtian (Late Cretaceous) of Belgium (Eben- Emael) and the Netherlands (Halter 1995) and the Maastrichtian (Late Cretaceous) and, Danian (early Paleocene) of Denmark.

  • Genus Crassescyliorhinus Underwood and Ward, 2008

  • Type species: Scyliorhinus germanicus Herman, 1982; Maastrichtian, Hemmoor Zement AG quarry, North-West Germany.

  • Crassescyliorhinus germanicus (Herman, 1982)
    Fig. 9J, K.

  • 1977 Scyliorhinus elongatus (Davis); Herman 1977: 252, pl. 11: 1H.

  • 1982 Scyliorhinus germanicus sp. nov.; Herman 1982: pl. 2: 10, pl. 4: 4, 5.

  • 1989 Scyliorhinus germanicus Herman; Müller 1989: 47, pl. 11: 5, pl. 12: 1–4.

  • 2001 Scyliorhinus sp.; Cappetta in Cappetta and Odin 2001: 651, pl. 1: 8a, b.

  • 2008 Crassescyliorhinus germanicus (Herman); Underwood and Ward 2008: 512, pl. 2: 10–18.

  • Material.—14 teeth from the Ce of Stevns Kridtbrud (MGUH 29870, GMV2012-75 [batch number]), 10 from the Br1 at Kulstirenden (MGUH 29871, GM2012-76 [batch number]), and one from the Br2 at Faxe (GMV2012-77).

  • Description.—Teeth displaying some monognathic and ontogenetic heterodonty. Low crowned robust teeth with a short massive conical main cusp and two pairs of cusplets diminishing in size from the main cusp. Anterior teeth are more symmetrical than lateral teeth. The labial face of the crown is flat with strong ornamentation in smaller teeth and less so in larger teeth. The ornamentation consists of three to six vertical folds on the main cusp bifurcating into a reticulate pattern in the basal part of the crown. The crown strongly overhangs the root and the median part of the basal edge of the crown is indented in anterior and lateral teeth. The lingual face is strongly convex and carries fine vertical or reticulated folds. Larger teeth lack most of the labial ornamentation, and posterior teeth are lower crowned and more mesio-distally elongated. The root is missing in almost all specimens. Teeth reaching a width of 3.0 mm and 2.5 mm in height.

  • Remarks.—Herman (1982) argued that the ornamentation of the teeth is a function of age and jaw position. This appears to be supported by the teeth sampled at Stevns Kridtbrud, as larger teeth appear to lack the labial ornamentation, whereas smaller teeth are strongly ornamented. Posterior teeth are always ornamented regardless of size.

  • Stratigraphic and geographic range.—Late Cretaceous: late Coniacian to early Campanian of Southern England (Underwood and Ward 2008), middle Campanian of France (Vullo 2005), to the late Maastrichtian of Northern Germany (Herman 1982) and the middle Danian (early Paleocene) of Denmark.

  • Fig. 9.

    Carcharhiniformes from the Danian of Stevns Kridtbrud and Kulstirenden and Faxe kalkbrud. AF. Palaeogaleus aff. faujasi (Geyn, 1937). A. MGUH 29872 (Ce) anterior tooth in labial (A1) and lingual (A2) views. B. MGUH 29873 (Ce) lateral tooth in labial (B1) and lingual (B2) views. C. MGUH 29874 (Br1) posterior tooth in labial (C1) and lingual (C2) views. D. MGUH 29875 (Br1) anterior tooth in labial (D1) and lingual (D2) views. E. MGUH 29876 (Br1) anterior tooth in labial (E1) and lingual (E2) views. F. MGUH 29877 (Br1) lateral tooth in labial (F1) and lingual (F2) views. G. Triakidae sp., MGUH 29878 (Br1) tooth in labial (G1) and lingual (G2) views. H, I. Paratriakis curtirostris (Davis, 1887). H. MGUH 29879 (Ce) anterior tooth in labial (H1), lingual (H2), and distal (H3) views. I. MGUH 29880 (Ce) lateral tooth in labial (I1), lingual (I2), and mesial (I3) views.

    f09_313.jpg

    Family Triakidae Gray, 1851
    Genus Palaeogaleus Gurr, 1963

  • Type species: Galeocerdo vincenti Daimeries, 1888; Thanetian, Orple- Grand, Belgium.

  • Palaeogaleus aff. faujasi (Geyn, 1937)
    Fig. 9A–F, ?G.

  • Material.—16 teeth from the Ce of Stevns Kridtbrud (MGUH 29872, MGUH 29873, GMV2012-78 [batch number]) and four from Kulstirenden (Br1) (MGUH 29874–29877).

  • Description.—Teeth displaying moderate degree of monognathic heterodonty. Anterior teeth are symmetrical and narrow with a large elongated triangular main cusp that is flanked by two pairs of small triangular cusplets diminishing in size outwards. Lateral teeth are wider, but still retain a more or less symmetrical shape with an erect main cusp whereas in posterior teeth the main cusp is declined towards the commissure. The labial face of the crown is convex and in general smooth, but may carry strong short folds below the shoulders in some specimens. In anterior teeth the basal edge of the crown is convex, whereas lateral and posterior teeth have a median indented basal edge. The labial face strongly overhangs the root. The lingual face is smooth and convex. The root is missing in most specimens, but some remnants indicate a low bilobed root with a flat basal face and a deep median groove. One of the specimens (Fig. 9G) has a more narrow crown and more robust labial folds. It may represent an extreme variant or an undescribed species. For the moment is best referred to as Triakidae sp.

  • Teeth reaching 2.0 mm in height and 2.5 mm in width.

  • Remarks.—Several Cretaceous and Paleocene species of Palaeogaleus have been described from Europe, North Africa, and North America all of which show a marked degree of intraspecific variation. The Danish material is more similar to the Maastrichtian P. jaujasi of the Netherland (Geyn 1937b) than the Paleocene P. vincenti of Belgium (Daimeries 1888), as the apex of the cusplets in P. vincenti is more blunt than observed in P. faujasi. Additionally some tooth positions in P. vincenti can have a heavily folded labial crown base. Cvancara and Hoganson (1993: fig. 3Z–AA) depicted two incomplete specimens which they referred to as P. vincenti, but could as well be conspecific with the Danish material.

  • Stratigraphic and geographic range.—Late Cretaceous: late Campanian of France (Vullo 2005), Maastrichtian of the Netherlands (Geyn 1937b; Herman 1977) and Spain (Cappetta and Corral 1999) to the Danian (early Paleocene) of Denmark.

  • Genus Paratriakis Herman, 1977

  • Type species: Paratriakis bettrechiensis Herman, 1977; Bettrechies, Turonian of France.

  • Stratigraphic and geographic range.—Late Cretaceous: Cenomanian of Lebanon (Davis 1887) to the Campanian of Belgium (Herman 1977) to the Danian (early Paleocene) of Denmark.

  • Paratriakis curtirostris (Davis, 1887)
    Fig. 9H, I.

  • Material.—45 specimens teeth from the Ce of Stevns Kridtbrud (MGUH 29879, MGUH 29880, GMV2012-79 [batch number]) and one from the Br2 at Faxe (GMV2012-80).

  • Description.—Teeth displaying little monognathic heterodonty. Strongly labio-lingually compressed teeth and all wider than high. Teeth with a single cusp strongly inclined towards the commissure. The mesial cutting edge is straight at an angle of 40 to 50° to the basal edge of the crown, but turning upwards at the apex of the main cusp. The distal cutting edge of the cusp is convex, joining the distal shoulder in a notch. The distal shoulder is at a near right angle to the distal edge of the crown in anterior teeth, but somewhat less in lateral teeth. The apex of the cusp never protrudes further distally than the distal edge of the crown. The labial face of the cusp is smooth and convex, but is at an angle with the body of the crown, creating a small mesio-distal trough. The basal edge of the crown strongly overhangs the root and creates a ledge. The lingual face of the crown is convex and smooth. The labial face of the root is very low with multiple foramina; the basal face of the root is flat and tapering at both ends. The basal edge of the roots has a deep median notch. The lingual face of the root is low and with a median protuberance and a median foramina. Anterior teeth have a smaller height to width ratio than lateral and posterior teeth. Teeth reaching up to 1.3 mm in height and 2.5 mm in width.

  • Remarks.—Body fossils of P. curtirostris are known from Sahel Alma in Lebanon (Davis 1887; Cappetta 1980), so the dentition in this particular species is well known, although our knowledge of intraspecific variability is limited.

  • Unidentified material

    In addition to the material described and illustrated above, several large unidentifiable fragments of selachian teeth >15 mm were also collected, indicating that larger sharks were more numerous than the identifiable teeth may indicate. Furthermore, numerous osteichthyan bones, jaws, vertebrae and teeth all less than 4 mm in length were recovered.

    Concluding remarks

    The species recovered from the early to middle Danian limestone rocks in Denmark are shown in Table 1.

    The results from the early Danian Cerithium Limestone reveal a fauna mainly consisting of small Carcharhiniformes and Squaliformes but also large sharks, such as Cretalamna appendiculata, Chlamydoselachus sp., and Palaeohypotodus aff. bronni. The occurrence of Chlamydoselachus sp. is the earliest record of Chlamydoselachidae in Europe. This and the occurrence of species of Dalatiidae and Scymnorhinidae casts some doubt on whether the Cerithium Limestone really was deposited in shallow water (Hansen 1990), as modern relatives of these families tend to be deep water dwellers. The preferred habitats of these families may have been affected by factors like oceanic oxygenation, productivity and tem perature from the warm Paleogene to the cooler Neogene, but we regard this as unlikely.

    Table 1.

    Distribution of fossil shark taxa collected from the Cerithium Limestone (Ce) and the bryozoan limestone (Br1 and Br2). 17 species have been found in the early Danian Cerithium Limestone, 8 species in the lowermost part of the bryozoan limestone at Kulstirenden and further 17 species at the Quarry at Faxe. +, rare to; +++, abundant.

    t01_313.gif

    During the deposition of the bryozoan limestone the fauna changes from one dominated by small Carcharhiniformes and Squaliformes to one dominated by Hexanchiformes and Lamniformes. In particular, Cretolamna and Striatolamia become very common and the synechodontiform Sphenodus becomes abundant. The Hexanchiformes are represented by no fewer than four species in the bryozoan limestone of Faxe and include the oldest record of Heptranchias howelli. Whereas the teeth of Hexanchus and Heptranchias are common, comparably few teeth of Notidanodon and Gladioserratus have been found. What attracted so many species of hexanchiform to this habitat is unknown, but there were several other large shark species present, so it was not due to a lack of other top predators.

    The fauna from the early Danian limestone is an impoverished Cretaceous fauna lacking among others the large Anacoracidae which became extinct at the end of the Cretaceous. The fauna did, however, contain a many species that were present in the late Maastrichtian and survived across the K–T boundary and well into the Danian. The fauna from the bryozoan limestone (Faxe Formation) is, however, very different from the late Maastrichtian-early Danian fauna, and is characterized by diverse hexanchids and very numerous Cretolamna and Sphenodus specimens. This change in faunal composition has been linked to a change in environment, from a warm to a cool water environment.

    This study suggests that the Boreal Sea acted as a refugium for Cretaceous species, as it did with ammonites (Machalski and Heinberg 2005). The only major comparable study on sharks and rays is that of Noubhani and Cappetta (1997) on Moroccan materials, in which they recorded only two species in common either side of the K–T boundary. Just as this Danish study is to an extent extreme; deep cool water and a short span, the Moroccan situation is the opposite, warm shallow water and probably a long temporal hiatus. It is evident that many groups of sharks not present in this study also survived the K–T boundary elsewhere. The lack of rays at the Danish localities could be attributed to bathymetry, as rays, particularly Rajiformes, may not have been adapted to deep cool water in the early Paleogene.

    Acknowledgements

    We thank the following amateur palaeontologists for letting us access their collections and donating specimens: the late Alice and Henning Rasmussen and their son Life Rasmussen (Faxe, Denmark), Stig J. Andersen (Ballerup, Denmark). We thank Jan Rees (Karlstad, Sweden) in particular for donating his large sample of specimens from the Cerithium Limestone. We thank Thomas Hansen and Claus Heinberg (both Department of Geography and Geology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark) for donating specimens. We thank Faxe Kalk for letting us collect in their quarry. We are grateful for help from Jakob W. Hansen (Copenhagen, Denmark) and Jacob J.M. Markmann (Ruds Vedby, Denmark) in collecting samples. We are very grateful to Sten Lennart Jakobsen (Natural History Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark) for imaging, preparation of specimens, and field help. We thank Gilles Cuny (Natural History Museum of Denmark) for helpful discussions, advice, and access to the collection. The manuscript was improved by the helpful and constructive comments of the reviewers, Charlie Underwood (University of London, UK) and Romain Vullo (University of Rennes, France).

    References

    1.

    S. Adnet 2006. Nouvelles faunes de sélaciens (Elasmobranchii, Neoselachii) de l'Eocene moyen des Landes (sud-ouest, France); implication dans la connaissance des communautés de sélaciens d'eaux profondes. 128 pp. Verlag Friedrich Pfeil, München. Google Scholar

    2.

    S. Adnet , H. Cappetta , and J.P.H. Reynders 2006. Nouveaux genres de Squaliformes (Chondrichthyes) du Paléogène des Landes (Sud-Ouest de la France). Paläontologische Zeitschrift 80: 60–67. Google Scholar

    3.

    L.J.R. Agassiz 1833–1844. Recherches sur les Poissons Fossiles 3. 390 + 32 pp. Imprimerie de Petitpierre, Neuchâtel. Google Scholar

    4.

    M.T. Antunes and H. Cappetta 2002. Sélaciens du Crétacé (Albien-Maastrichtien) d'Angola. Palaeontographica Abteilung A 264: 85–146. Google Scholar

    5.

    C. Arambourg 1952. Les vertébrés fossiles des gisements de phosphates, Maroc, Algerie, Tunisie. Notes et Mémoires du Service Géologique du Maroc 92: 1–372. Google Scholar

    6.

    S.E. Bendix-Almgreen 1983. Carcharodon megalodon from the Upper Miocene of Denmark, with comments on elasmobranch tooth enameloid: coronoïn. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark 32: 1–32. Google Scholar

    7.

    M. Bernecker and O. Weidlich 1990. The Danian (Paleocene) coral limestone of Fakse, Denmark: a model for ancient aphotic, azooxanthellate coral mounds. Facies 22: 103–137. Google Scholar

    8.

    M. Bernecker and O. Weidlich 2005. Azooxanthellate corals in the Late Maastrichtian-Early Paleocene of the Danish basin: bryozoan and coral mounds in a boreal shelf setting. In : A. Freiwald and J.M. Roberts (eds.), Cold-Water Corals and Ecosystems, Erlangen Earth Conference Series, 3–25. Springer, Berlin. Google Scholar

    9.

    M. Bieńkowska-Wasiluk and A. Radwański 2009. A new occurrence of sharks in the Menilite Formation (Lower Oligocene) from the Outer (Flysch) Carpathians of Poland. Acta Geologica Polonica 59: 235–243. Google Scholar

    10.

    M. Bjerager and F. Surlyk 2007. Benthic palaeoecology of Danian deepshelf bryozoan mounds in the Danish Basin. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 250: 184–215. Google Scholar

    11.

    M.J.M. Bless , A. Demoulin , P.J. Felder , J.W.M. Jagt , and J.P.H. Reynders 1991. The Hautes Fagnes area (NE Belgium) as a monadnock during the Late Cretaceous. Annales de la Société Géologique de Belgique 113: 75–101. Google Scholar

    12.

    N. Bonde , S. Andersen , N. Hald , and S.L. Jakobsen 2008. Danekræ-Danmarks bedste fossiler. 225 pp. Gyldendal, Copenhagen. Google Scholar

    13.

    J.P. Bonnaterre 1788. Ichtyologie. Tableau encyclopédique et méthodique des trois règnes de la nature. 215 pp. Panckouke, Paris. Google Scholar

    14.

    R. Böttcher and C.J. Duffin 2000. The neoselachian shark Sphenodus from the Late Kimmeridgian (Late Jurassic) of Nusplingen and Egesheim (Baden-Württemberg, Germany). Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde, Serie B 01/2000 283: 1–31. Google Scholar

    15.

    J. Bourdon , K. Wright , S.G. Lucas , J.A. Spielmann , and R. Pence 2011. Selachians from the Upper Cretaceous (Santonian) Hosta Tongue of the Point Lookout Sandstone, central New Mexico. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science, Bulletin 52: 1–54. Google Scholar

    16.

    H. Cappetta 1976. Sélaciens nouveaux du London Clay de l'Essex (Yprésien du bassin de Londres). Geobios 9: 551–575. Google Scholar

    17.

    H. Cappetta 1980. Les sélaciens du Crétacé supérieur du Liban. I: Requins. Palaeontographica, Abteilung A 168: 69–148. Google Scholar

    18.

    H. Cappetta 1981. Additions à la faune de sélaciens fossiles du Maroc: 1: Sur la présence des genres Heptranchias, Alopias et Odontorhytis dans l'Yprésien des Ouled Abdoun. Geobios 14: 563–575. Google Scholar

    19.

    H. Cappetta 1987. Chondrichthyes II : Mesozoic and Cenozoic Elasmobranchii. 193 pp. G. Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart. Google Scholar

    20.

    H. Cappetta 2006. Elasmobranchii post-Triadici (Index specierum et generum). 472 pp. Backhuys, Leiden. Google Scholar

    21.

    H. Cappetta 2012. Chondrichthyes (Mesozoic and Cenozoic Elasmobranchii: Teeth). 512 pp. Verlag Friedrich Pfeil, München. Google Scholar

    22.

    H. Cappetta and J.C. Corral 1999. Upper Maastrichtian selachians from the Condado de Treviño (Basque-Cantabrian region, Iberian peninsula). Estudios del Museo de Ciencias Naturales de Alava 14: 339–372. Google Scholar

    23.

    H. Cappetta and D. Nolf 2005. Révision de quelques Odontaspididae (Neoselachii: Lamniformes) du Paléocène et de l'Eocène du Bassin de la Mer du Nord. Bulletin de l'Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Science de la Terre 75: 237–266. Google Scholar

    24.

    H. Cappetta and G.S. Odin 2001. Les sélaciens du Campanien-Maastrichtien de Tercis-les-Bains (SO France). In : G.S. Odin (ed.), The Campanian- Maastrichtian Boundary , 645–651. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam. Google Scholar

    25.

    G.R. Case 1994. Fossil fish remains from the Late Paleocene Tuscahoma and Early Eocene Bashi Formations of Meridian, Lauderdale County, Mississippi, Part I. Selachians. Palaeontographica, Abteilung A 230: 97–138. Google Scholar

    26.

    G.R. Case 1996. A new selachian fauna from the Lower Hornerstown Formation (Early Paleocene/Montian) of Monmouth County, New Jersey. Palaeontographica, Abteilung A 242: 1–14. Google Scholar

    27.

    G.R. Case and P.D. Borodin 2000. A Middle Eocene selachian fauna from the Castle Hayne Limestone Formation of Duplin County, North Carolina. Münchner Geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen A 39: 17–32 Google Scholar

    28.

    G.R. Case , D.R. Schwimmer , P.D. Borodin , and J.J. Leggett 2001. A new selachian fauna from the Eutaw Formation (Upper Cretaceous/ Early to Middle Santonian) of Chattahoochee County, Georgia. Palaeontographica, Abteilung. A 261: 83–102. Google Scholar

    29.

    E. Casier 1943. Contributions à l'étude des poissons fossiles de la Belgique. III. Quelques espèces nouvelles ou peu connues du Landénien marin. Bulletin du Musée Royal d'Histoire Naturelle de Belgique 19: 1–16. Google Scholar

    30.

    L. Compagno , M. Dando , and S. Fowler 2005 Sharks of the World. 368 pp. Princeton University Press, Princeton. Google Scholar

    31.

    C.P. Consoli 2009. A rare Danian (Early Paleocene) Chlamydoselachus (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii) from the Takatika Grit, Chatham Islands, New Zealand. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 28: 285–290. Google Scholar

    32.

    S.B. Cunningham 2000. A comparison of isolated teeth of early Eocene Striatolamia macrota (Chondrichthyes, Lamniformes), with those of a Recent sand shark, Carcharias taurus. Tertiary Research 20: 17–31. Google Scholar

    33.

    A.M. Cvancara and J.W. Hoganson 1993. Vertebrates of the Cannonball Formation (Paleocene) in North and South Dakota. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 13: 1–23. Google Scholar

    34.

    A. Daimeries 1888. Notes ichthyologiques (Système Landenien) I. Annales de la Société Royale Malacologique de Belgique, Bulletin des des Séances 23: 42–43. Google Scholar

    35.

    J.A. Dalinkevičius 1935. On the fossil fishes of the Lithuanian Chalk. I. Selachii. Vytatauto Didžiojo Universiteto Matematikos, Gamtos Fakulteto Darbai. Mémoires de la Faculté des Sciences de l'Université de Vytautas le Grand 9: 245–305. Google Scholar

    36.

    E. Dartevelle and E. Casier 1943. Les poissons fossiles du Bas Congo et des régions voisines. Annales du Musée du Congo Belge, Série A (Minéralogie Géologie, Paléontologie) 3: 1–200. Google Scholar

    37.

    J.W. Davis 1887. The fossil fishes of the chalk of Mount Lebanon in Syria. Scientific Transactions of the Royal Dublin Society 3: 457–636. Google Scholar

    38.

    J.W. Davis 1890. On the fossil fish of the Cretaceous formations of Scandinavia. Scientific Transactions of the Royal Dublin Society 4: 363–434. Google Scholar

    39.

    D.B. Dutheil , F. Moreau , and G. De Plöeg 2006. Les ichthyofaunes du gisement à ambre de Le Quesnoy (Paléocène et Éocène du bassin de Paris, France). Cossmanniana 11: 1–13. Google Scholar

    40.

    A. Ekdale and R.G. Bromley 1984. Sedimentology and ichnology of the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary in Denmark; implications for the causes of the terminal Cretaceous extinction. Journal of Sedimentary Research 54: 681–703. Google Scholar

    41.

    J.R. Ellis and S.E. Shackley 1995. Ontogenic changes and sexual dimorphism in the head, mouth and teeth of the lesser spotted dogfish. Journal of Fish Biology 47: 155–164. Google Scholar

    42.

    S. Floris 1979. Guide to Fakse Limestone Quarry. In : T. Birkelund y (eds.), Cretaceous-Tertiary Boundary Events Symposium I. The Maastrichtian and Danian of Denmark , 152–163. University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen. Google Scholar

    43.

    S. Floris 1980. The coral banks of the Danian of Denmark. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 25: 531–540. Google Scholar

    44.

    G. Forchhammer 1825. De geognostostiske frohold i en Deel af Sjelland og Naboeöerne. Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabers Selskab, physiske og mathematiske Skrifter 1: 248–280. Google Scholar

    45.

    G. Forchhammer 1835. Danmarks geognostiske Forhold forsaavidt som de ere afhængige af Dannelser, der ere sluttede. 112 pp. Schulz, Copenhagen. Google Scholar

    46.

    F.C. Fulgosi , S. Casati , A. Orlandini , and D. Persico 2009. A small fossil fish fauna, rich in Chlamydoselachus teeth, from the Late Pliocene of Tuscany (Siena, central Italy). Cainozoic Research 6: 3–23. Google Scholar

    47.

    W.A.E. Geyn , van de 1937b. Les élasmobranches du Crétacé marin du Limbourg Hollandais. Natuurhistorich maandblad 26: 42–43. Google Scholar

    48.

    L.S. Glickman 1957. On the relationships between the families Lamnidae and Odontaspidae and on new lamnid genera from the Late Cretaceous [in Russian]. Trudy Geologičeskogo Muzeâ « A.P. Karpinskogo » Akademii Nauk S.S.S.R. 1: 110–117. Google Scholar

    49.

    L.S. Glickman 1958. Rates of evolution in lamnoid sharks [in Russian]. Doklady Akademii Nauk Soȗza Sovetskih Socialističeskih Respublik 123: 568–571. Google Scholar

    50.

    L.S. Glickman 1964. Akuly paleogena i ih stratigrafičeskoe značenie. 228 pp. Nauka. Moskva. Google Scholar

    51.

    L.S. Glickman 1980. Evoluciâ melovyh i kainozoiskih lamnoidnyh akul. 247 pp. Nauka, Moskva. Google Scholar

    52.

    M. Goto and The Japanese Club for Fossil Shark Tooth Research 2004. Tooth remains of chlamydoselachian sharks from Japan and their phylogeny and paleoecology. Earth Science 58: 361–374. Google Scholar

    53.

    M. Goto , T. Uyeno , and Y. Yabumoto 1996. Summary of Mesozoic elasmobranch remains from Japan. In : G. Arratia and G. Viohl (eds.), Mesozoic Fishes—Systematics and Paleoecology , 73–82. Verlag Friedrich Pfeil, München. Google Scholar

    54.

    M.D. Gottfried , J.A. Rabarison , and L. Randriamiarimanana 2001. Late Cretaceous elasmobranchs from the Mahajanga Basin of Madagascar. Cretaceous Research 22: 491–496. Google Scholar

    55.

    G. Guinot , C.J. Underwood , H. Cappetta , and D.J. Ward 2012. Squatiniformes (Chondrichthyes, Neoselachii) from the Late Cretaceous of southern England and northern France with redescription of the holotype of Squatina cranei Woodward, 1888. Palaeontology 55: 529–551. Google Scholar

    56.

    P.R. Gurr 1962. A new fish fauna from the Woolwich Bottom Bed (Sparnacian) of Herne Bay, Kent. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association 73: 419–447. Google Scholar

    57.

    M.C. Halter 1995. Additions to the fish fauna of NW Europe. 3. Three new species of the genus Scyliorhinus from the late Cretaceous (Campanian and Maastrichtian) of the Limburg area (Belgium and the Netherlands) with the reassignment of four additional species to the genus Scyliorhinus sensu stricto. Elasmobranches et stratigraphie. Professional Paper of the Belgian Geological Survey 278: 65–110. Google Scholar

    58.

    H.J. Hansen 1990. Diachronous extinctions at the K/T boundary; A scenario. Geological Society of America, Special Paper 247: 417–423. Google Scholar

    59.

    C. Heinberg 1999. Lower Danian bivalves, Stevns Klint, Denmark: continuity across the K/T boundary. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 154: 87–106. Google Scholar

    60.

    C. Heinberg 2005. Morphotype biostratigraphy, diachronism, and bivalve recovery in the earliest Danian of Denmark. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark 52: 81–95. Google Scholar

    61.

    J. Herman 1972. Les vertébrés du Landénien Inférieur (LIa ou Heersien) de Maret (Hameau d'Orp-le-Grand). Bulletin de la Société Belge de Géologie, de Paléontologie et d'Hydrologie 81: 191–207. Google Scholar

    62.

    J. Herman 1977. Les Sélaciens des terrains néocrétacés et paléocènes de Belgique et des contrées limitrophes. Eléments d'une biostratigraphie intercontinentale. Mémoires pour Servir à l'Explication des Cartes Géologiques et Minières de la Belgique 15: 1–401. Google Scholar

    63.

    J. Herman 1982. Die Selachier-Zähne aus der Maastricht-Stufe von Hemmoor, Niederelbe (NW-Deutschland). Geologisches Jahrbuch A 61: 129–159. Google Scholar

    64.

    J. Herman and M. Crochard 1977. Additions to the Eocene fish fauna of Belgium. 3. Revision of the Orectolobiforms. Tertiary Research 1: 127–138. Google Scholar

    65.

    J. Herman , M. Hovestadt-Euler , D. Hovestadt , and M. Stehmann 1994. Contributions to the study of the comparative morphology of teeth and other relevant ichthyodorulites in living supra-specific taxa of Chondrichthyan fishes. Part B: Batomorphii: Order Rajiformes-Suborder: Rajoidei-Family: Rajidae-Genera and subgenera: Anacanthobatis (Schroederobatis), Anacanthobatis (Springeria), Breviraja, Dactylobatus, Gurgesiella (Grugesiella), Gurgesiella (Fenestraja), Malacoraja, Neoraja and Pavoraja. Bulletin de l'Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique. Biologie 64: 165–207. Google Scholar

    66.

    T. Hübner and A. Müller 2010. Selachian teeth from Campanian sediments (Upper Cretaceous) of the Münsterland Cretaceous Basin (NW-Germany). Paläontologische Zeitung 84: 437–455. Google Scholar

    67.

    L. Jeppsson , R. Anehus , and D. Fredholm 1999. The optimal acetate buffered acetic acid technique for extracting phosphatic fossils. Journal of Paleontology 73: 964–972. Google Scholar

    68.

    S. Klug and J. Kriwet 2010. Timing of deep-sea adaptation in dogfish sharks: insights from a supertree of extinct and extant taxa. Zoologica Scripta 39: 331–342. Google Scholar

    69.

    E.G. Kordikova , P.D. Polly , V.A. Alifanov , Z. Roček , G.F. Gunnell , and A.O. Averianov 2001. Small vertebrates from the Late Cretaceous and early Tertiary of the northeastern Aral Sea Region, Kazakhstan. Journal of Paleontology 75: 390–400. Google Scholar

    70.

    J. Kriwet , J.M. Lirio , H.J. Nuñez , E. Puceat , and C. Lécuyer 2006. Late Cretaceous Antarctic fish diversity. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 258: 83–100. Google Scholar

    71.

    J. Kriwet , R. Soler-Gijón , and N. López-Martinéz 2007. Neoselachians from the upper Campanian and lower Maastrichtian (upper Cretaceous) of the southern Pyrenees, northern Spain. Palaeontology 50: 1051–1071. Google Scholar

    72.

    E.M. Lauginiger and E.F. Hartstein 1983. A guide to fossil sharks, skates, and rays from the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal area, Delaware. Delaware Geological Survey, University of Delaware, Open File Report 21: 6–95. Google Scholar

    73.

    R. Lawley 1876. Nuovi studi sopra ai pesci ed altri vertebrati fossili delle Colline Toscane. 122 pp. Tipografia dell Arte della Stampa, Florence. Google Scholar

    74.

    M. Leriche 1902. Les poissons Paléocènes de la Belgique. Musée Royal d'Historie Naturelle de Belgique 2: 1–48. Google Scholar

    75.

    M. Leriche 1927. Les Poissons du Crétacé marin de la Belgique et du Limbourg hollandais (note préliminaire). Bulletin de la Société Belge de Géologie, de Paléontologie et d'Hydrologie 37: 199–299. Google Scholar

    76.

    M. Machalski and C. Heinberg 2005. Evidence for ammonite survival into the Danian (Paleogene) from the Cerithium Limestone at Stevns Klint, Denmark. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark 52: 97–111. Google Scholar

    77.

    A.L.A. Mannering and N. Hiller 2008. An early Cenozoic neoselachian shark fauna from the Southwest Pacific. Palaeontology 51: 1341–1365. Google Scholar

    78.

    E. Martini 1971. Standard Tertiary and Quaternary calcareous nannoplankton zonation. In : A. Farinacci (ed.), Proceedings of the Second Planktonic Conference , 739–785. Technoscienza, Roma. Google Scholar

    79.

    J. Milàn , B.E.K. Lindow , and B.W. Lauridsen 2011. Bite traces in a turtle carapace fragment from the middle Danian (Lower Paleocene) bryozoan limestone, Faxe, Denmark. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark 59: 61–67. Google Scholar

    80.

    V. Milthers 1908. Beskrivelse til Kortbladene Faxe og Stevns Klint. Danmarks geologiske Undersøgelse, 1 , 11: 1–291 pp. Google Scholar

    81.

    F. Moreau and S. Mathis 2000. Les élasmobranches du Thanétien (Paléocène) du Nord de la France, des carrières de Templeuve et de Leforest. Cossmanniana 7: 1–18. Google Scholar

    82.

    A. Müller 1989. Selachier (Pisces: Neoselachii) aus dem höheren Campanium (Oberkreide) Westfalens (Nordrhein-Westfalen, NW-Deutschland). Geologie und Paläontologie in Westfalen 14: 5–161. Google Scholar

    83.

    A. Müller and L. Schöllmann 1989. Neue Selachier (Neoselachii, Squalomorphii) aus dem Campanium Westfalens (NW-Deutschland). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen 178: 1–35. Google Scholar

    84.

    A. Müller and C. Diedrich 1991. Selachier (Pisces, Chondrichthyes) aus dem Cenomanium von Ascheloh am Teutoburger Wald (Nordrhein- Westfalen, NW-Deutschland). Geologie und Paläontologie in Westfalen 20: 3–105. Google Scholar

    85.

    G.J.P. Naylor , A.P. Martin , E.G. Matisson , and W.M. Brown 1997. The inter-relationships of lamniform sharks: Testing hypotheses with sequence data. In : T.D Kocher and C.A. Stepien (eds.), Molecular Systematics of Fishes ,195–214. Academic Press, London. Google Scholar

    86.

    J.K. Nielsen and S.L. Jakobsen 2004. Extraction of calcareous macrofossils from the Upper Cretaceous white chalk and other sedimentary carbonates in Denmark and Sweden: the acid-hot water method and the waterblasting technique. Palaeontologia Electronica 7: 1–11. Google Scholar

    87.

    K.B. Nielsen 1917. Cerithiumkalken i Stevns klint. Meddelelser fra Dansk Geologisk Forening 5: 1–14. Google Scholar

    88.

    A. Noubhani and H. Cappetta 1997. Les Orectolobiformes, Carcharhiniformes et Myliobatiformes (Elasmobranchii, Neoselachii) des Bassins à phosphate du Maroc (Maastrichtien-Lutétien basal): systématique, biostratigraphie, évolution et dynamique des faunes. 327 pp. Verlag Friedrich Pfeil, München. Google Scholar

    89.

    K. Perch-Nielsen 1979. Calcareous nannofossil zonation at the Cretaceous/ Tertiary boundary in Denmark. In : T. Birkelund and R.G. Bromley (eds.), Cretaceous-Tertiary Boundary Events Symposium I. The Maastrichtian and Danian of Denmark , 115–135. University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen. Google Scholar

    90.

    F.H. Pfeil 1983. Zahnmorphologische Untersuchungen an rezenten und fossilen Haien der Ordnungen Chlamydoselachiformes und Echinorhiniformes. PalaeoIchthyologica 1: 1–315. Google Scholar

    91.

    F.H. Pfeil 2012. Proteothrinax, a new replacement name for Thrinax Pfeil, 1983 (Elasmobranchii: Chlamydoselachidae). In : F.H. Pfeil (ed.), Piscium Catalogus: Elasmobranchii, Pars 1—Proteothrinax nom. nov., 1 p. Pfeil Verlag, München. Google Scholar

    92.

    F.-J. Pictet 1865. Note sur une dent de l'étage aptien des environs d'Apt, appartenant à un Notidanus non décrit. Annales de la Société Litéraire Scientifique et Artistique 1: 67–70. Google Scholar

    93.

    F. Priem 1897. Sur des dents d'elasmobranches de divers gisements Sénoniens (Villedieu, Meudon, Folx-les-Cocves). Extrait du Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France 3e Série 25: 40–56. Google Scholar

    94.

    J.A. Rasmussen , C. Heinberg , and E. Håkansson 2005. Planktonic foraminifers, biostratigraphy and the diachronous nature of the lowermost Danian Cerithium Limestone at Stevns Klint, Denmark. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark 52: 113–131. Google Scholar

    95.

    D. Reed 1946. New species of fossil shark from New Jersey. Notulae Naturae of the Acadamy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 172: 1–3. Google Scholar

    96.

    J. Rees 2005. Neoselachian shark and ray teeth from the Valanginian, lower Cretaceous of Wąwał, central Poland. Palaeontology 48: 209–221. Google Scholar

    97.

    W. Reif 1976. Morphogenesis, pattern formation and function of the dentition of Heterodontus (Selachii). Zoomorphology 83: 1–47. Google Scholar

    98.

    T. Reinecke and P. Engelhard 1997. The selachian fauna from Geschiebe of the Lower Selandian basal conglomerate (Thanetian, Late Paleocene) in the Danish subbasin (Sealand, Scania, Western Baltic Sea). Erratica 2: 3–45. Google Scholar

    99.

    M. Richter and D.J. Ward 1990. Fish remains from the Santa Marta Formation (Late Cretaceous) of James Ross Island, Antarctica. Antarctic Science 2: 67–76. Google Scholar

    100.

    A. Rosenkrantz 1939. Faunaen i Cerithiumkalken og det hærdnede Skrivekridt i Stevns Klint. Meddelelser fra Dansk Geologisk Forening 9: 509–514. Google Scholar

    101.

    A. Rosenkrantz 1966. Die Senon/Dan-Grenze in Dänemark. Berichte der Deutschen Gesellschäft für Geologische Wissenschaften, Reihe A, Geologie und Paläontologie 11: 721–727. Google Scholar

    102.

    W. Schwarzhans 2003. Fish otoliths from the Paleocene of Denmark. Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland Bulletin 2: 94. Google Scholar

    103.

    M. Siverson 1992. Biology, dental morphology and taxonomy of lamniform sharks from the Campanian of the Kristianstad Basin, Sweden. Palaeontology 35: 519–554. Google Scholar

    104.

    M. Siverson 1993a. Late Cretaceous and Danian neoselachians from southern Sweden. Lund Publications in Geology 110: 1–28. Google Scholar

    105.

    M. Siverson 1993b. Maastrichtian squaloid sharks from southern Sweden. Palaeontology 36: 1–19. Google Scholar

    106.

    M. Siverson 1995. Revision of the Danian cow sharks, sand tiger sharks, and goblin sharks (Hexanchidae, Odontaspididae, and Mitsukurinidae) from southern Sweden. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 15: 1–12. Google Scholar

    107.

    M. Siverson 1999. A new large lamniform shark from the uppermost Gearle Siltstone (Cenomanian, Late Cretaceous) of Western Australia. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Earth Sciences 90: 49–66. Google Scholar

    108.

    F. Surlyk , T. Damholt , and M. Bjerager 2006. Stevns Klint, Denmark: Uppermost Maastrichtian chalk, Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary, and lower Danian bryozoan mound complex. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark 54: 1–48. Google Scholar

    109.

    H.-T. Teng 1962. Classification and distribution of the Chondrichthyes of Taiwan. 304 pp. Ogawa Press, Maizuru. Google Scholar

    110.

    D. Thies and A. Müller 1993. A neoselachian fauna (Vertebrata, Pisces) from the Late Cretaceous (Campanian) of Höver, near Hannover (NW Germany). Paläontologische Zeitschrift 67: 89–107. Google Scholar

    111.

    E. Thomsen 1995. Kalk og kridt i den danske undergrund. In : O.B. Nielsen (ed.), Danmarks geologi fra Kridt til i dag, 31–68. Århus Geokompendier, Århus. Google Scholar

    112.

    C.J. Underwood and S.L. Cumbaa 2010. Chondrichthyans from a Cenomanian (Late Cretaceous) bonebed, Saskatchewan, Canada. Palaeontology 53: 903–944. Google Scholar

    113.

    C.J. Underwood and J. Schlogl 2013. Deep water chondrichthyans from the Early Miocene of the Vienna Basin (Central Paratethys, Slovakia). Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 58: 487–509. Google Scholar

    114.

    C.J. Underwood and D. Ward 2008. Sharks of the Order Carcharhiniformes from the British Coniacian, Santonian and Campanian (Upper Cretaceous). Palaeontology 51: 509–536. Google Scholar

    115.

    C.J. Underwood , A. Goswami , G. Prasad , O. Verma , and J.J. Flynn 2011. Marine vertebrates from the “middle” Cretaceous (early Cenomanian) of South India. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 31: 539–552. Google Scholar

    116.

    X. Vélez-Zuazo and I. Agnarsson 2011. Shark tales: A molecular species- level phylogeny of sharks (Selachimorpha, Chondrichthyes). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 58: 207–217. Google Scholar

    117.

    G. Vincent 1876. Description de la faune de l'étage Landénien inférieur de Belgique. Annales de la Société royale malacologique de Belgique 11: 111–160. Google Scholar

    118.

    R. Vullo 2005. Selachians from the type Campanian area (Late Cretaceous), Charentes, western France. Cretaceous Research 26: 609–632. Google Scholar

    119.

    R. Vullo , E. Bernárdez , and A.D. Buscalioni 2009. Vertebrates from the middle?-late Cenomanian La Cabaña Formation (Asturias, northern Spain): Palaeoenvironmental and palaeobiogeographic implications. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 276: 120–129. Google Scholar

    120.

    R. Vullo , H. Cappetta , and D. Néraudeau 2007. New sharks and rays from the Cenomanian and Turonian of Charentes, France. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 52: 99–116. Google Scholar

    121.

    M. Waldman 1971. Hexanchid and orthacodontid shark teeth from the lower Tertiary of Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 8: 166–170. Google Scholar

    122.

    D.J. Ward 2010. Sharks and rays. In : J.R. Young , A.S. Gale , R.I. Knight , and A.B. Smith (eds.), Field Guide to Fossils Number 12: Fossils of the Gault Clay, 275–299. The Palaeontological Association, London. Google Scholar

    123.

    B.J. Welton 1974. Heptranchias Howellii (Reed, 1946) (Selachii, Hexanchidae) in the Eocene of the United States and British Columbia. Paleobios 17: 1–15. Google Scholar

    124.

    B.J. Welton 1979. Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic Squalomorphii of the Northwest Pacific Region. 533 pp. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley. Google Scholar

    125.

    B.J. Welton and R.F. Farish 1993. The Collector's Guide to Fossil Sharks and Rays from the Cretaceous of Texas. 204 pp. Before Time, Lewisville. Google Scholar

    126.

    M. Willumsen 1995. Early lithification in Danian azooxanthellate scleractinian lithoherms, Faxe Quarry, Denmark. Beiträge zur Paläontologie 20: 123–131. Google Scholar

    127.

    A.S. Woodward 1888. On some Remains remains of Squatina cranei, sp. nov., and the mandible of Belonostomus cinctus, from the Chalk of Sussex, preserved in the collection of Henry Willett, Esq., F.G.S., Brighton Museum. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society 44: 144–148. Google Scholar

    128.

    A.S. Woodward 1889. Catalogue of the Fossil Fishes in the British Museum. Part I. 474 pp. British Museum (Natural History), London. Google Scholar

    129.

    A.F.J. Wroblewski 2004. New Selachian Paleofaunas from “Fluvial” Deposits of the Ferris and Lower Hanna Formations (Maastrichtian-Selandian: 66–58 Ma), Southern Wyoming. Palaios 19: 249–258. Google Scholar
    Copyright © 2015 J.S. Adolfssen and D.J. Ward. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
    Jan S. Adolfssen and David J. Ward "Neoselachians from the Danian (Early Paleocene) of Denmark," Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 60(2), 313-338, (24 May 2013). https://doi.org/10.4202/app.2012.0123
    Received: 21 October 2012; Accepted: 1 May 2013; Published: 24 May 2013
    KEYWORDS
    Cerithium Limestone
    Chondrichthyes
    Danian
    Denmark
    Faxe Formation
    Paleocene
    Back to Top