Translator Disclaimer
14 August 2013 Is Millipede Taxonomy Based on Gonopod Morphology Too Inclusive? Observations on Genetic Variation and Cryptic Speciation in Bicoxidens flavicollis (Diplopoda: Spirostreptida: Spirostreptidae)
T. Mwabvu, J. Lamb, R. Slotow, M. Hamer, D. Barraclough
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The structure of the male gonopods of millipedes has been considered to be species-specific. As such, gonopods—which aid in copulation and sperm transfer—are used in the taxonomic diagnosis and description of species. However, it was recently demonstrated that gonopod morphology is not always characteristic of species. Diagnoses based on gonopod morphology can therefore result in underestimation of taxonomic diversity amongst millipedes. On the basis of this observation, we examined genetic variation in two populations (approximately 250 km apart) of a widely distributed and colour-polymorphic southern African millipede, namely Bicoxidens flavicollis Attems, 1928. An analysis of genetic divergence based on 520 nucleotides of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase 1 gene, and 684 nucleotides of the mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene, demonstrated high levels of divergence (19.09% for cytochrome oxidase 1 and 6.66% for 16S rRNA) between the two populations. These results suggest the presence of cryptic species in B. flavicollis and, furthermore, corroborate observations that taxonomy based on gonopod morphology may be too inclusive.

INTRODUCTION

Morphology — based taxonomy is extensively used to delimit taxa (Schlick-Steiner et al. 2007), particularly in groups that are poorly known and difficult to identify, such as millipedes (Hamer 2000). Male genitalia/gonopods are intromittent organs which are widely used in taxonomy on the grounds that they exhibit species-specific characters (Song & Bucheli 2010). Despite increasing use of DNA sequence data in invertebrate taxonomy (e.g. Pfenninger et al. 2007; Burns et al. 2008), gonopod morphology is still central to spirostreptid millipede taxonomy (e.g. Hoffman 2008; Hamer 2009; Mwabvu et al. 2010), because it has been mooted that the divergent male genitalia suggest reproductive isolation (Bond et al. 2003).

Although male gonopods evolve rapidly and divergently (Song & Bucheli 2010), speciation may be unaccompanied by change in gonopod morphology. According to Bond et al. (2003), speciation occurred without gonopod divergence in a species of the spirobolid millipede genus Anadenobolus Silvestri, 1897. In view of this evidence, morphology-based classifications are being re-evaluated against other criteria because morphology may fail to separate genetically distinct species (Bond & Sierwald 2002; Adams et al. 2009).

Sequences of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase 1 (CO1), 16S rRNAand 18S rRNA genes have been used to assess genetic divergence within many taxa. For example, mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene sequences were used in taxonomic studies of Chilopoda (Edgecombe & Giribet 2004), Polydesmida (Marek & Bond 2007), Hymenoptera (Dowton & Austin 1994), Australian elapid snakes (Keogh et al. 2000) and the Anadenobolus excisus (Karsch, 1881) millipede species complex (Bond & Sierwald 2002).

The genus Bicoxidens Attems, 1928, is endemic to southern Africa (Mwabvu et al. 2007). It includes medium to large (length 75–170 mm, diameter 6.6–10.6 mm) species (Mwabvu 2000; Mwabvu et al. 2007). Body colour ranges from shades of black and brown through to orange-yellow (Mwabvu et al. 2007). Bicoxidens species have been collected in diverse vegetation types, including Brachystegia or Acacia-dominated savannah woodland, and riverine and montane habitats (Mwabvu et al. 2007).

The taxonomic validity of Bicoxidens, as based on gonopod morphology, is not in doubt. Among the nine known species, B. flavicollis Attems, 1928, is the most widely distributed, occurring in east, north, south-west and central Zimbabwe, and in western Mozambique (Mwabvu et al. 2007) (Fig. 1). Although the male gonopods of B. flavicollis are identical in shape, body colour varies throughout the distribution range. Black, brown and orange-yellow specimens have been recorded in different habitats (Mwabvu et al. 2007). Given their poor dispersal ability and preference for moist microhabitats, millipedes are likely to speciate in isolation (Hopkin & Read 1992; Hamer & Slotow 2000). As a result, many millipede groups may contain hidden species (Brewer et al. 2012) that cannot be identified using gonopod morphology alone. Because reproductive isolation and genetic divergence are expected to increase with time, they are correlated (Fitzpatrick 2002). As such, the colour polymorphic and widely distributed B. flavicollis could be a species complex.

Fig. 1.

Distribution of the nine Bicoxidens species in Southern Africa.

f01_349.jpg

Considering the urgent need for information on invertebrate diversity in southern Africa (Hamer & Slotow 2002), there is much to be gained by investigating intraspecific genetic variation in millipedes, because diversity data and correct identification of taxa have implications for biodiversity conservation and other disciplines. Moreover, there is a paucity of genetic information on millipedes. This paper provides basic data and hopefully will stimulate further research on millipede genetics.

The objective of this research was to test the hypothesis that B. flavicollis is a species complex, by investigating genetic divergence in the CO1 and 16S rRNA mitochondrial genes in two populations. Given the great distance separating the two populations and the poor dispersal ability of millipedes, we predicted strong genetic differentiation between these populations of B. flavicollis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fresh males of B. flavicollis were collected in Zimbabwe at Muterere (18°25′S 32°57′E) in the eastern highlands, and from Chihota, near Harare (18°15′S 31°05′E). In addition, males of Cacuminostreptus mazowensis Mwabvu in Mwabvu et al. 2010 obtained at Mazowe Dam (17°30′S 30°58′E) and Archispirostreptus tumuliporus (Karsch, 1881) from Marange (18°57′S 32°27′E), both localities being in Zimbabwe, were included as outgroups from the same family (Spirostreptidae). The millipedes were collected by hand, preserved in 100% ethanol, and deposited in the KwaZulu-Natal Museum, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.

Total genomic DNA was obtained from the legs of preserved millipedes. The legs were first ground using a pestle and mortar. DNA was then extracted using the Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Polymerase chain reactions targeting part of the mitochondrial CO1 and 16S rRNA genes were performed after optimisation using gradient PCR. Primers for the amplification of the genes were as used by Lavrov et al. (2002) and Bond & Sierwald (2002).

PCR products were electrophoresed at 15 V for 16 hours in 1.5% agarose gel containing 200 µl ethidium bromide (0.05 mg/m1) and using 0.5× TBE buffer. The PCR products were purified with a Zymoclean Gel Recovery Kit (Zymo Research, USA). Products were sequenced on an ABI 3730 capillary sequencer at Inqaba Biotechnical Industries (Pty) Ltd (Hatfield, Pretoria, South Africa). DNA samples that did not amplify after PCR, were cloned and sequenced for CO1. Raw sequences were edited in BioEdit version 7 (Hall 1999), and aligned using the Clustal W algorithm in BioEdit and by inspection. The alignments were trimmed to 684 nucleotides and 520 nucleotides of mitochondrial 16S rRNA and CO1 genes, respectively.

Bayesian, maximum parsimony and neighbour-joining analyses were performed to determine genetic distances between and phylogenetic relationships among the taxa. The general time-reversible (GTR) model was selected using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) for both the 16S rRNA and CO1 datasets, and was used subsequently in Bayesian and neighbour-joining analyses. Neighbour-joining and maximum parsimony analyses were implemented in PAUP (Swofford 2002). Genetic distances were presented as distance matrices and as a neighbour-joining tree, which was bootstrapped using 1000 pseudo-replicates. For parsimony analysis, the random additions sequence option (n=100) for discrete, unordered characters was used. The shortest tree was obtained using the heuristic search option under the tree bisection-reconnection (TBR) branch-swapping option. The degree of support for each node of the resulting tree was estimated using bootstrap re-sampling analysis (1000 pseudo-replicates; Felsenstein 1985). Bayesian analysis was implemented in Mr Bayes 3.0 (Huelsenbeck & Ronquist 2001), using flat priors. For all analyses, four Markov chains were run for 5 million generations each, and the first 500,000 trees were discarded as burn-in.

TABLE 1

Comparisons of genetic divergence between Bicoxidens flavicollis specimens and the outgroups, indicated by general time-reversible genetic distances (%) based on 684 nucleotides of the mitochondrial 16S rRNAgene. Abbreviations: C — Chihota, D — Muterere, numbers next to each letter reflect the number of replicates.

t01_349.gif

Sequence data were registered at GenBank: KF057753 (B. flavicollis D5), KF057754 (B.flavicollis D3), KF057755 (B.flavicollis D1), KF057756 (B.flavicollis C5), KF057757 (B. flavicollis C2), KF057752 (C. mazowensis) and KF057758 (A. tumuliporus). Additional outgroup sequences of taxa belonging to the orders Spirobolida (Narceus americanus (Palisot de Beauvois, 1817), Narceus annularis (Rafinesque, 1820), Narceus gordanus (Chamberlin, 1943) and Anadenobolus excisus), Spirostreptida (Thyropygus sp.) and Julida (Cylindroiulus caeruleocinctus (Wood, 1864) and Anagaiulus blancatypa Enghoff, 1992) were obtained from the NCBI GenBank database.

RESULTS

We were able to obtain good quality sequence reads from only two specimens (one from each population) for CO1, but from three specimens from Muterere and two from Chihota populations for 16S RNA. The sequences from Chihota and Muterere were very divergent, and both CO1 and 16S genetic distances between the two populations were higher than expected. Genetic divergence between Chihota and Muterere specimens based on analysis of the CO1 gene, was 19.09 %. In respect of the 16S data, B. flavicollis was divided into two strongly supported sister clades (Fig. 2), separated by a genetic distance of greater than 6% (Table 1). Based on the 16S rRNA gene, the highest intrapopulation genetic variation at Chihota was 1.54 %. At Muterere, the range of variation was 0–0.15%, which was much lower than that at Chihota (Table 1). The 16S rRNA sequence dataset provided robust support for B. flavicollis from Chihota and Muterere as representing distinct taxa (Bayesian posterior probability 0.92 and 1.00, maximum parsimony bootstrap 100% and neighbour-joining bootstrap 100%) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Bayesian Inference tree based on analysis of 684 nucleotides of the mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene, showing relationships between Bicoxidens flavicollis and outgroups from the orders Spirostreptida, Spirobolida and Julida. Numbers next to outgroups are GenBank accession numbers. This tree is congruent in structure, with maximum parsimony and neighbour-joining analyses of the same dataset. Nodal support values are indicated as posterior probability/maximum parsimony bootstrap/ neighbour-joining bootstrap.

f02_349.jpg

DISCUSSION

Although only a small number of samples were successfully sequenced, genetic variation among specimens of B. flavicollis from the Muterere and Chihota populations nevertheless suggests that diagnosis based on gonopod morphology underestimates taxonomic diversity. These results lend support to the views of Hamer and Slotow (2000). After studying the gonopods of a common African millipede genus Doratogonus, Hamer and Slotow (2000) reported that the diagnoses of the species might be too inclusive. Studies in other invertebrate groups also support the assertion that morphology alone may not accurately reflect taxonomic diversity. For example, DNA sequences identified cryptic species in the lepidopteran genera Cymothoe Hüber (van Velzen et al. 2007) and Perichares Scudder (Burns et al. 2008), in an ant Tetramorium Mayr (Schlick-Steiner et al. 2006), and in the dipteran genus Chironomus Meigen (Pfenninger et al. 2007).

Although sequence divergence threshold values of 2–3 % have been assigned for designating species in insects and mammals (Rubinoff et al. 2006), the levels of sequence divergence and threshold values in African millipedes have not been determined. Therefore, this study is an important contribution to understanding millipede genetic diversity. The large CO1 and 16S genetic distances between B. flavicollis at Muterere and Chihota suggest the existence of more than one species. The contention of the presence of cryptic species in B. flavicollis would be supported by Lefébure et al. (2006), who proposed designation of species in Crustacea using a CO1 divergence threshold of below 16%, which is lower than the 19.09 % detected between the two populations of B. flavicollis. Moreover, with regard to 16S rRNA, genetic divergence of less than 2% is accepted as representing intraspecific variation in other taxa (Bond 2004). Therefore, if 2% divergence is used as a threshold value for species designation, 6% divergence between the two populations of B. flavicollis likewise suggests the presence of cryptic species, which could not be identified using genitalic morphology. The two strongly supported subclades of Bicoxidens (Fig. 2) further justify our assertion that the taxon B. flavicollis contains more than one species.

The marked genetic variability in B. flavicollis is not surprising. Bicoxidens species are small-bodied, with poor dispersal ability (Mwabvu et al. 2007), and as they tend to have very limited distributions, there is presumably restricted gene flow. Furthermore, the small population in Muterere occurs in vegetation on an isolated granite outcrop. This probably explains the low intra-population genetic variation compared with the population in Chihota. In addition, besides the genetic variation between the two populations, at Muterere the specimens of B. flavicollis are yellow with brown stripes, while at Chihota the millipedes are black, as in most areas of the distribution range.

Greater than expected genetic distinctiveness between the two populations of B. flavicollis emphasises the need to review taxonomies based on gonopod morphology. Because gonopod morphological change may not be correlated with genetic change (Adams et al. 2009), morphological ‘species’ might be hiding considerable levels of cryptic variation. Many species of millipedes are local or site endemics (Hamer & Slotow 2002), making them IUCN threatened (Hamer 2009), and thus in need of prioritising for conservation. Therefore, a threshold genetic distance for designating millipede species should be assigned in order to facilitate investigations into cryptic diversity.

In the light of differences in the rate of evolution of genes (Lefébure et al. 2006) and because of the small number of replicates in this study, the notion that B. flavicollis is a species complex warrants further research, using more genes and larger samples from throughout the distribution range. The information could be used to infer patterns and processes, and to enhance understanding of endemicity levels in spirostreptid millipedes in Africa. In addition to increased taxon sampling, further investigations into the suitability of the genes are required because some genetic markers are appropriate only for differentiating specific taxa (see Vences et al. 2005).

Given the large degree of genetic divergence between the two populations of B. flavicollis, the considerable intraspecific variation in gonopods reported in some groups (Brewer et al. 2012), and that reproductive isolation is correlated with genetic divergence (Fitzpatrick 2002), it would be valuable to investigate gonopod morphology in millipedes (as suggested by Brewer et al. (2012)) using morphometric landmark or shape analyses. Such studies might identify subtle variations in gonopods that demonstrate morphological stasis in shape and structure. Because the distribution of the nine currently recognised Bicoxidens species is known, future work could also include genetic divergence and cytogenetic studies of the species, in order to understand speciation in spirostreptids and to provide useful data on chromosomal evolution.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The research was funded by the University of KwaZulu-Natal and a Focus Area grant from the National Research Foundation, South Africa. We wish to thank Miss Theshnie Naidoo for training the first author in molecular laboratory techniques.

REFERENCES

1.

D.C. Adams , C.M. Berns , K.H. Kozak & J.J. Wiens 2009. Are rates of species diversification correlated with rates of morphological evolution? Proceedings of the Royal Society B 276: 2729–2738. Google Scholar

2.

J.E. Bond 2004. Systematics of the Californian euctenizine spider genus Apomastus (Araneae: Mygalomorphae: Cyrtaucheniidae): the relationship between molecular and morphological taxonomy. Invertebrate Systematics 18: 361–376. Google Scholar

3.

J.E. Bond , D.A. Beamer , M.C. Hedin & P. Sierwald 2003. Gradual evolution of male genitalia in a sibling species complex of millipedes (Diplopoda: Spirobolida: Rhinocricidae: Anadenoboius). Invertebrate Systematics 17: 711–717. Google Scholar

4.

J.E. Bond & P. Sierwald 2002. Cryptic speciation in the Anadenoboius excisus millipede species complex on the island of Jamaica. Evolution 56 (6): 1123–1135. Google Scholar

5.

M.S. Brewer , C.L. Spruill , N.S. Rao & J.E. Bond 2012. Phylogenetics of the millipede genus Brachycybe Wood, 1864 (Diplopoda: Platydesmida: Andrognathidae): patterns of deep evolutionary history and recent speciation. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 64: 232–242. Google Scholar

6.

J.M. Burns , D.H. Janzen , M. Hajibabaei , W. Hallwachs & P.D.N. Hebert 2008. DNA barcodes and cryptic species of skipper butterflies in the genus Perichares in Area de Conservación Guanacaste, Costa Rica. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 105 (17): 6350–6355. Google Scholar

7.

M. Dowton & A.D. Austin 1994. Molecular phylogeny of the insect order Hymenoptera: apocritan relationships. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 91: 9911–9915. Google Scholar

8.

G.D. Edgecombe & G. Giribet 2004. Adding mitochondrial sequence data (16S rRNA and cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1) to the phylogeny of centipedes (Myriapoda: Chilopoda): an analysis of morphology and four molecular loci. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 42: 89–134. Google Scholar

9.

J. Felsenstein 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783–791. Google Scholar

10.

B.M. Fitzpatrick 2002. Molecular correlates of reproductive isolation. Evolution 56 (1): 191–198. Google Scholar

11.

T.A. Hall 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95–98. Google Scholar

12.

M. Hamer 2000. Review of the millipede genus Doratogonus, with descriptions of fifteen new species from Southern Africa (Diplopoda, Spirostreptida, Spirostreptidae). Annals of the Natal Museum 41: 1–76. Google Scholar

13.

M. Hamer 2009. Three new species of Doratogonus from South Africa (Diplopoda: Spirostreptida: Spirostreptidae). In : S.M. Roble & J. C. Mitchell , eds, A lifetime of contributions to myriapodology and the natural history of virginia: A Festschrift in honor of Richard L. Hoffman's 80th birthday. Virginia Museum of Natural History Special Publication 16: 187–194. Google Scholar

14.

M.L. Hamer & R. Slotow 2000. Patterns of distribution and speciation in the genus Doratogonus (Diplopoda: Spirostreptidae). In : J. Wytwer & S. Golovatch , eds, Progress in studies on Myriapoda and Onychophora. Fragmenta Faunistica 43 (Supplement): 295–311. Google Scholar

15.

M.L. Hamer & R. Slotow 2002. Conservation application of existing data for South African millipedes (Diplopoda). African Entomology 10 (1): 29–42. Google Scholar

16.

R.L. Hoffman 2008. Two new genera of spirostreptid millipeds from central Africa, with a new terminology for male genitalia in the family Spirostreptidae (Diplopoda: Spirostreptida). Tropical Zoology 21 (2): 167–186. Google Scholar

17.

S.P. Hopkin & H.J. Read 1992. The biology of millipedes. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar

18.

J.P. Huelsenbeck & F. Ronquist 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754–755. Google Scholar

19.

J.S. Keogh , I.A.W. Scott & J.D. Scanlon 2000. Molecular phylogeny of viviparous Australian elapid snakes: affinities of Echiopsis atriceps (Storr, 1980) and Drysdalia coronata (Schlegel, 1837), with description of anew genus. Journal of Zoology 252: 317–326. Google Scholar

20.

D.V. Lavrov , J.L. Boore & W.M. Brown 2002. Complete mtDNA sequences of two millipedes suggest a new model for mitochondrial gene rearrangements: duplication and nonrandom loss. Molecular Biology and Evolution 19(2): 163–169. Google Scholar

21.

T. Lefébure , C.J. Douady , M. Gouy & J. Gibert 2006. Relationship between morphological taxonomy and molecular divergence within Crustacea: proposal of a molecular threshold to help species delimitation. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 40: 435–447. Google Scholar

22.

P.E. Marek & J.E. Bond 2007. A reassessment of apheloriine millipede phylogeny: additional taxa, Bayesian inference, and direct optimization (Polydesmida: Xystodesmidae). Zootaxa 1610: 27–39. Google Scholar

23.

T. Mwabvu 2000. Two new species of Bicoxidens Attems, 1928, from Zimbabwe (Diplopoda: Spirostreptida: Spirostreptidae). African Zoology 35 (1): 115–119. Google Scholar

24.

T. Mwabvu , M.L. Hamer & R.H. Slotow 2007. A taxonomic review of the southern African millipede genus, Bicoxidens Attems, 1928 (Diplopoda: Spirostreptida: Spirostreptidae), with the description of three new species and a tentative phylogeny. Zootaxa 1452: 1–23. Google Scholar

25.

T. Mwabvu , M. Hamer , R. Slotow & D. Barraclough 2010. A revision of the taxonomy and distribution of Archispirostreptus Silvestri 1895 (Diplopoda, Spirostreptida, Spirostreptidae), and description of a new spirostreptid genus with three new species. Zootaxa 2567: 1–49. Google Scholar

26.

M. Pfenninger , C. Nowak , C. Kley , D. Steinke & B. Streit 2007. Utility of DNA taxonomy and barcoding for the inference of larval community structure in morphologically cryptic Chironomus (Diptera) species. Molecular Ecology 16: 1957–1968. Google Scholar

27.

D. Rubinoff , S. Cameron & K. Will 2006. A genomic perspective on the shortcomings of mitochondrial DNA for “barcoding” identification. Journal of Heredity 97 (6): 581–594. Google Scholar

28.

B.C. Schlick-Steiner , B. Seifert , C. Stauffer , E. Christian , R.H. Crozier & F.M. Steiner 2007. Without morphology, cryptic species stay in taxonomic crypsis following discovery. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22 (8): 391–392. Google Scholar

29.

B.C. Schlick-Steiner , F.M. Steiner , K. Moder , B. Seifert , M. Sanetra , E. Dyreson , C. Stauffer & E. Christian 2006. A multidisciplinary approach reveals cryptic diversity in Western Palearctic Tetramorium ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 40: 259–273. Google Scholar

30.

H. Song & S.R. Bucheli 2010. Comparison of phylogenetic signal between male genitalia and non-genital characters in insect systematics. Cladistics 26: 23–35. Google Scholar

31.

D.L. Swofford 2002. PAUP * : phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods), Version 4. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates. Google Scholar

32.

R. Van Velzen , F.T. Bakker & J.J.A. Van Loon 2007. DNA barcoding reveals hidden species diversity in Cymothoe (Nymphalidae). Proceedings of the Netherlands Entomological Society Meeting 18: 95–103. Google Scholar

33.

M. Vences , M. Thomas , A. Van Der Meijden , Y. Chiari & D.R. Vieites 2005. Comparative performance of the 16S rRNA gene in DNA barcoding of amphibians. Frontiers in Zoology 2 (Art. 5): 1–12. ( http://www.frontiersinzoology.com/content/2/1/5; accessed 29/10/2012) Google Scholar

Notes

[1]  http://africaninvertebrates.org urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1BD03DEB-501E-4EF6-A0B8-A26A7AC99D36

T. Mwabvu, J. Lamb, R. Slotow, M. Hamer, and D. Barraclough "Is Millipede Taxonomy Based on Gonopod Morphology Too Inclusive? Observations on Genetic Variation and Cryptic Speciation in Bicoxidens flavicollis (Diplopoda: Spirostreptida: Spirostreptidae)," African Invertebrates 54(2), 349-356, (14 August 2013). https://doi.org/10.5733/afin.054.0203
Published: 14 August 2013
JOURNAL ARTICLE
8 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top