BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 17 December 2024 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
5 February 2021 Vineyards Assessed Under a Biophysical Approach: Findings From the Biohydrology and TERRAenVISION Meetings
María José Marqués, Alexander Remke, Jesús Rodrigo-Comino
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

During the Biohydrology 2019 (24-27 July 2019, Valencia, Spain) and TERRAenVISION 2019 (2-7 September 2019, Barcelona, Spain) meetings, the scientific sessions joined reputed scientists around the world. Innovative debates during these scientific sessions about vineyards focused on the use of new technologies to assess soil erosion and nutrient losses, benefits or damages generated by tillage, the use of cover crops, and the introduction of organic farming. Among all the high-quality posters and oral presentations in these 2 abovementioned conferences, 3 groups from different countries with an extended list of publications decided to publish their new findings on the special issue: Vineyards Assessed Under a Biophysical Approach.

Recent research is demonstrating new advances to reduce land degradation processes in agricultural fields. In vineyards, this is necessary considering the exacerbated issues related to soil erosion,1 loss of nutrients,2,3 and decrease in fertility.46 Soils are key to understand human and natural ecosystems.7 During the last 2 decades, the research conducted on vineyards is becoming more and more exhaustive. Biophysical approaches are playing a significant role to decipher the magnitude of human impacts affecting soil quality, especially.810

During the Biohydrology 2019 (24-27 July 2019, Valencia, Spain) and TERRAenVISION 2019 (2-7 September 2019, Barcelona, Spain) meetings, the scientific sessions joined reputed scientists around the world. Innovative debates during these scientific sessions about vineyards focused on the use of new technologies to assess soil erosion and nutrient losses, benefits or damages generated by tillage, the use of cover crops, and the introduction of organic farming. Among all the high-quality posters and oral presentations in these 2 abovementioned conferences, 3 groups from different countries with an extended list of publications decided to publish their new findings on the special issue: Vineyards Assessed Under a Biophysical Approach.

The first paper was published by Bogunovic et al11 assessing soil erosion in a Croatian vine plantation, where the loss of fertile soils due to compaction, tillage, and bare surfaces is significant.12,13 The main novelty of this research was to compare the impacts of croplands and vineyards under conventional management on some key soil properties and its hydrological response. The research was conducted in Eastern Croatia (Figure 1A and B). Rainfall simulations were used as the main method combined with soil analysis. They concluded that overall, non-invertive tillage practices in vineyards were able to maintain soil structure, allowing better soil quality and decreasing soil degradation.

Figure 1.

Panoramic overviews of all the study areas: (A and B) Vineyards in Eastern Croatia. (C and D) Vineyards in north-central Portugal. (E and F) Vineyards in Central Spain.

10.1177_1178622120985817-fig1.tif

In Portugal, Ferreira et al14 provided a study case in the Bairrada viticultural region, located in north-central Portugal (Figure 1C and D). These vineyards are characterized by intense and frequent tillage with the application of chemicals.15 As we mentioned, fortunately, this soil management is being substituted by integrated production and, to a lesser degree, no-tillage, and biodynamic approach. These authors assessed the differences in soil quality of 4 vineyards for 6 years using soil analysis collected along the rows and inter-rows. Also, forest soils were sampled as a control plot to compare with prior land-uses. They concluded that conventional management can diminish soil quality, considering the lower contents of organic matter and nutrients (total nitrogen, phosphorus), and exchangeable cations, as well as its higher concentration of trace elements.

The last study was carried out in Madrid (Spain; Figure 1D and E), where the effects of alternative soil managements to tillage were considered in summer and autumn as critical seasons for soil degradation because of the high-intensity and short-duration rainfall events.16 They examined the differences between runoff and soil moisture patterns at different soil depths focused on 2 different treatments: traditional tillage and permanent cover crop using the herbaceous species Brachypodium distachyon (L) P Beauv. Rainfall simulation experiments on closed plots of 2 m2 were used and wine parameters were also tested. The main conclusions obtained were the necessity to develop proper site-specific management plans to avoid water shortages and that cover crops can be recommended for soil protection in semi-arid environments. These results complete previous results obtained in other pioneer investigations conducted by this group in this region17,18 or when compared with other European vineyards.19

Acknowledgements

We want to thank all of the contributors to the special issue for their willingness to participate, and for the time invested, as well as the reviewers, associate editors, and editorial manager. All of them have actively contributed to the success of this special issue. All the guest editors are very happy with the organization of both meetings. Thanks a lot to all the local organizers of Biohydrology and TERRAenVISION Meetings.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed equally to the work.

REFERENCES

1.

Rodrigo-Comino J. Five decades of soil erosion research in ‘terroir’. The state-of-the-art. Earth Sci Rev. 2018;179:436–447. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.02.014. Google Scholar

2.

Napoli M , Marta AD , Zanchi CA , Orlandini S. Assessment of soil and nutrient losses by runoff under different soil management practices in an Italian hilly vineyard. Soil Tillage Res. 2017;168:71–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.12.011. Google Scholar

3.

Ramos MC , Martínez-Casasnovas JA. Impacts of annual precipitation extremes on soil and nutrient losses in vineyards of NE Spain. Hydrologic Processes. 2009;23:224–235. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7130. Google Scholar

4.

Probst B , Schüler C , Joergensen RG. Vineyard soils under organic and conventional management – microbial biomass and activity indices and their relation to soil chemical properties. Biol Fertil Soils. 2008;44:443–450. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-007-0225-7. Google Scholar

5.

Novara A , Pisciotta A , Minacapilli M , et al. The impact of soil erosion on soil fertility and vine vigor. A multidisciplinary approach based on field, laboratory and remote sensing approaches. Sci Total Environ. 2017;622-623:474–480. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.272. Google Scholar

6.

Vaudour E , Leclercq L , Gilliot JM , Chaignon B. Retrospective 70 y-spatial analysis of repeated vine mortality patterns using ancient aerial time series, Pléiades images and multi-source spatial and field data. Int J Appl Earth Observ Geoinform. 2017;58:234–248. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2017.02.015. Google Scholar

7.

Rodrigo-Comino J , López-Vicente M , Kumar V , et al. Soil science challenges in a new era: a transdisciplinary overview of relevant topics. Air, Soil Water Res. 2020;13:1178622120977491. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1178622120977491. Google Scholar

8.

Marques MJ , Bienes R , Cuadrado J , Ruiz-Colmenero M , Barbero-Sierra C , Velasco A. Analysing perceptions attitudes and responses of winegrowers about sustainable land management in Central Spain. Land Degrad Develop. 2015;26:458–467. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2355. Google Scholar

9.

Pappalardo SE , Gislimberti L , Ferrarese F , De Marchi M , Mozzi P. Estimation of potential soil erosion in the Prosecco DOCG area (NE Italy), toward a soil footprint of bottled sparkling wine production in different land-management scenarios. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0210922. Google Scholar

10.

Galati A , Gristina L , Crescimanno M , Barone E , Novara A. Towards more efficient incentives for agri-environment measures in degraded and eroded vineyards. Land Degrad Develop. 2015;26:557–564. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2389. Google Scholar

11.

Bogunovic I , Telak LJ , Pereira P. Experimental comparison of runoff generation and initial soil erosion between vineyards and croplands of eastern Croatia: a case study. Air, Soil Water Res. 2020;13:1178622120928323. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1178622120928323. Google Scholar

12.

Bogunović I , Kisić I , Maletić E , Perčin A , Matošić S , Roškar L . Soil compaction in vineyards of different ages in Pannonian Croatia. Part I. Influence of machinery traffic and soil management on compaction of individual horizons. J Central Euro Agricul. 2016;17:533–544. Google Scholar

13.

Bogunović I , Kisić I , Maletić E , Jurišić A , Roškar L , Dekemati I. Soil Compaction in different ages vineyards in Pannonian Croatia. Part II. Modeling spatial variability of soil compaction parameters in vineyard. J Central Euro Agricul. 2016;17:545–562. Google Scholar

14.

Ferreira CS , Veiga A , Caetano A , et al. Assessment of the impact of distinct vineyard management practices on soil physico-chemical properties. Air, Soil Water Res. 2020;13:1178622120944847. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1178622120944847. Google Scholar

15.

Ferreira CSS , Keizer JJ , Santos LMB , et al. Runoff, sediment and nutrient exports from a Mediterranean vineyard under integrated production: an experiment at plot scale. Agricul Ecosyst Environ. 2018;256:184–193. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.01.015. Google Scholar

16.

Marques M , Ruiz-Colmenero M , Bienes R , García-Díaz A , Sastre B. Effects of a permanent soil cover on water dynamics and wine characteristics in a steep vineyard in the central Spain. Air, Soil Water Res. 2020;13:1178622120948069. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1178622120948069. Google Scholar

17.

García-Díaz A , Marqués MJ , Sastre B , Bienes R. Labile and stable soil organic carbon and physical improvements using groundcovers in vineyards from central {Spain}. Sci Total Environ. 2018;621:387–397. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.240. Google Scholar

18.

Ruiz-Colmenero M , Bienes R , Marques MJ. Soil and water conservation dilemmas associated with the use of green cover in steep vineyards. Soil Tillage Res. 2011;117:211–223. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2011.10.004. Google Scholar

19.

Rodrigo-Comino J , Iserloh T , Morvan X , et al. Soil erosion processes in European vineyards: a qualitative comparison of rainfall simulation measurements in Germany, Spain and France. Hydrology. 2016;3:6. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology3010006. Google Scholar
© The Author(s) 2021 This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
María José Marqués, Alexander Remke, and Jesús Rodrigo-Comino "Vineyards Assessed Under a Biophysical Approach: Findings From the Biohydrology and TERRAenVISION Meetings," Air, Soil and Water Research 14(1), (5 February 2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/1178622120985817
Received: 30 October 2020; Accepted: 8 December 2020; Published: 5 February 2021
KEYWORDS
biophysial approach
Human impacts
soils
sustainability
vineyards
Back to Top