Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
29 July 2022 Growth Responses of Indonesian Foxtail Millet (Setaria italica (L.) Beauv.) to Cadmium Stress
Nurul Jadid, Ira Puspaningtyas, Adillatul Lathiifatun Jannah, Chusnul Eka Safitri, Vidya Hana Dameria Hutahuruk
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Cadmium (Cd) contamination is considered as one of the most important environmental and human health issues worldwide. The occurrence of Cd in air, water and soil is resulted from massive industrialization, uncontrolled agricultural system and anthropogenic activities in urban lives. The presence of Cd in soil threatens human health through food chain bioaccumulation, negatively affect soil quality and also reduce the productivity of agricultural crops. Foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.) is an alternative cereal food that is highly tolerant to abiotic stresses such as drought and salinity. However, the mechanism underlying its response to the stress caused by heavy metals, such as Cd, remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the effects of Cd stress on morpho-physiological responses of the foxtail millet accession Buru Merah, cultivated using the hydroponic method. To this end, four levels of Cd concentrations (0, 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 µM in ABmix™ growth media) were applied for 4 weeks followed by morpho-physiological assessements, including plant height, root length, shoot and leaf number, panicle biomass measurements and chlorophyll content evaluation. Our results demonstrated that Cd stress perturbed the growth of foxtail millet on morpho-physiological parameters, particularly at the highest Cd concentration (1.5 µM). The negative effects of Cd stress included decrease in shoot length, root length, number of leaves and shoots, panicle biomass, and chlorophyll content. Furthermore, our findings showed that Cd stress affected the growth of foxtail millet in a concentration-dependent manner. Taken together, our findings might be useful for further development of strategies to increase plant tolerance to heavy metal stress and ensure sustainable food production. In addition, this study also demonstrated the importance of protecting nature from Cd contamination.

Introduction

Foxtail millet (Setaria italica) is a C4 cereal plant that belongs to the Poaceae family. It has been cultivated for more than 8000 years in North China (Jia et al., 2013; Prasad, 2017). Based on data collected in the Herbarium Bogoriense, Indonesia, it is estimated that in the early 1900s, foxtail millet was distributed in some Indonesian regions such as Sulawesi, Java, South Sumatra, Kalimantan, a small part of the Sunda Islands, Maluku, and Papua (Lestari et al., 2017). Foxtail millet is generally used as a bird feed despite the fact that the plant contains high fiber but low protein (Yulita & Ridwan, 2018). In some areas, such as Buru Island, Indonesia, the plant is considered a local superior food crop consumed by the local community (Herodian et al., 2008). The seeds contain carbohydrates, ranging from 60% to 80%; vitamins; and minerals such as calcium (Ca), iron (Fe), magnesium (Mg), phosphorus (P), zinc (Zn), and potassium (K).

The nutritional content of foxtail millet is three to five times higher than that of rice and wheat (Verma et al., 2015). Foxtail millet grows in arid and semiarid habitats and has a high tolerance to marginal environmental conditions. The plant is also able to grow well on various types of soil: from sandy to clay soils, even in rocky areas on hillsides (Herodian et al., 2008). Besides its advantages as alternative food, foxtail millet has the potential for biofuel production (Zhang et al., 2012). There are several accessions cultivated by Indonesian farmers, each of which has different morphological characteristics. In Maluku, Buru Merah and Buru Kuning are the most widely developed accessions. The Buru Merah accession shows better performance and viability than other accessions (Nisa & Jadid, 2021).

Several previous studies have revealed that foxtail millet is highly adaptable to environmental stress conditions such as drought stress and salinity stress (Lapuimakuni et al., 2018; Nisa & Jadid, 2021). However, studies on the responses of foxtail millet to heavy metals are limited. In some areas, including Buru Island, Indonesia, this plant is cultivated near a source of water that is polluted with heavy metal (Tupan & Uneputty, 2017). Cd contamination is thought to result from abrasion process in the river, garbage disposal activities by communities, wastewater irrigation, and ship repair and painting activities (Genchi et al., 2020). Additionally, Cd contamination in soil can result from the use of chemical or non-organic fertilizers, which are often used in agriculture (Khan et al., 2017).

A previous study revealed that the use of phosphate fertilizers on agricultural land could increase Cd content in the soil which can increase soil acidulation and hence, reduce the quality of the soil. Additionally, contamination of soil with Cd results in its accumulation in plants (Cui et al., 2014; Dharma-Wardana, 2018). According to the data from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Cd is the major contaminant or pollutant, after mercury (Hg) and lead (Pb), causing environmental damage (Jamers et al., 2013). Cadmium can cause kidney disorders, and at certain concentrations, it can cause damage to other organs such as the lungs and heart (Khan et al., 2017). Moreover, heavy metal stress is a limiting factor that causes a decrease in agricultural productivity (Gupta et al., 2013).

Cadmium is a nonessential micronutrient that is absorbed through the plant root system and transported to the aerial parts of plants (Abozeid et al., 2017). Cadmium accumulation in plants can cause changes in plant morphology and physiology (Bruno et al., 2017). The toxic effects of Cd on plants lead to chlorosis, leaf epinasty, and deformation of the chloroplast structure (Gill & Tuteja, 2011). Excessive Cd accumulation can inhibit nutrient uptake (Sánchez-Pardo et al., 2013), photosynthesis (Xue et al., 2013), cellular respiration, and nitrogen metabolism (Bruno et al., 2017). Templeton and Liu (2010) reported that Cd accumulation can inhibit enzyme activity, increase oxidative stress, and reduce antioxidant levels. Cd uptake occurs through protein transporters. However, the uptake of Cd in some other plants is non-specific (Lu et al., 2009). Most of metal ions enter via root cells and subsequently be detoxified in the cytoplasm. Vacuoles are act as storage organelles. Heavy metals sequestration and detoxification are important strategies for plants. These processes mainly take place in the cuticles and trichomes (Haider et al., 2021).

Many plants developed their defense mechanisms against Cd contamination in genotype-dependent manner (Haider et al., 2021). Some plants display high tolerance to Cd contamination. More than 450 species were classified as hyperaccumulators of heavy metals (Tran & Popova, 2013). Due to the negative effects of Cd contamination, an eco-friendly protocol for mitigating the contamination should be developed (Khanna, Jamwal, Gandhi, et al., 2019). The use of microbes as plant growth-promoting microorgananisms (PGPM) is now widely used by farmer, not only for reducing the Cd pollution from soils but also for improving agricultural crop productivity (Khanna et al., 2021).

The present work observed the effects of Cd stress on the morpho-physiological responses of the foxtail millet accession Buru Merah. In this study, four levels of Cd concentrations (0, 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 µM in ABmix™ growth media) were applied for 4 weeks to the tested plants using hydroponic compartments. Some morpho-physiological assessments, including plant height, root length, shoot and leaves number, panicle biomass measurements, and chlorophyll content evaluation were measured. Our study showed negative impact of Cd contamination on the growth and development of foxtail millet. This also highlighted the importance of protection the biosphere from heavy metal contamination.

Materials and Methods

Plant cultivation and Cd stress treatment

Foxtail millet (accession Buru Merah) seeds were obtained from the Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI). The 5-days germinated foxtail seeds were then transferred into hydroponic containers supplemented with the AB Mix™ medium (Figure 1). Fourteen days after planting (DAP) the foxtail millets, they were treated with CdCl2 (at concentrations of 0, 0.5, 1, and 1.5 µM) for 4 weeks (Salinitro et al., 2021). Nine replicates were used for each treatment unit (Salinitro et al., 2021).

Figure 1.

Foxtail millet accession Buru Merah treated with Cd stress.

10.1177_11786221221114310-fig1.tif

Morpho-physiological assessments

Plant growth is important parameter to evaluate the effect of abiotic stress (Sher et al., 2021). In this study plant growth were represented by some morphological factors including plant height, root length, number of leaves, and number of shoots. The assessment was performed after 4 weeks of treatment (Salinitro et al., 2021). All tested plants were removed from the hydroponic containers after 4 weeks of treatment and rinsed with tap water before being photographed to demonstrate the morphological appearances and root architecture. Panicle biomass and chlorophyll content were also measured. The panicles produced from the 28 days of treatment (DAT) plants were collected and photographed. Chlorophyll content is used to indicate the photosynthesis activity of the treated plants. Therefore, it might represent plant productivity (Nisa & Jadid, 2021). Chlorophyll was measured using two-wavelength spectrophotometers to determine the absorption spectra of the chlorophyll dissolved in organic solvents. Leaves (0.1 g) from each treatment were used for chlorophyll content analysis. The sample was ground in a mortar and homogenized using 2 ml of 80% acetone (Nisa & Jadid, 2021). Subsequently, the homogenate was transferred into a measuring cup and calibrated using an 80% acetone solvent to obtain a volume of 10 ml and then centrifuged at 2,500 rpm for 10 minutes. The supernatant obtained was then quantified at 645 and 663 nm using a spectrophotometer (Nisa & Jadid, 2021). The extinction coefficient and relative absorption of chlorophyll-a and -b dissolved in the acetone were determined according to Lichtenthaler (1987). The absorbance results obtained were utilized to measure the levels of chlorophyll-a, chlorophyll-b, and total chlorophyll using the following equation (Rajput & Patil, 2017):

(1)

10.1177_11786221221114310-eq1.tif

(2)

10.1177_11786221221114310-eq2.tif

(3)

10.1177_11786221221114310-eq3.tif

Note:

A: absorbance value at specific wavelength

V: volume of chlorophyll extracts (mL)

W: fresh weight of the extracted tissues (g)

Data analysis

All morphological measurements were conducted in triplicate, and the results were expressed as mean ± SD. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was performed using SPSS 25. Microsoft Excel 2010 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) was used for morphological and chlorophyll content data processing and interpretation. Statistical significance was indicated at p < .05.

Results and Discussion

Effect of Cd on plant height and root length

As assessed from the one-way ANOVA test, Cd stress at different concentrations had a significant effect (p < .05) on the morphological characteristics, such as plant height and root length, of Buru Merah. Our data demonstrated that the average height of plants treated with 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 µM Cd was 7.4%, 19.1%, and 29.3% lower than that of the control plant (Figures 2 and 3), respectively. These results were in agreement with those of Tian et al. (2017), who reported that high concentration of Cd contamination results in decreased height in S. italica plant compared to that in non-treated plants. However, their responses might be genotype- and Cd concentration-dependent. In addition, Cd stress has been reported to decrease other industrial crops height such as in cotton plants (Farooq et al., 2016), Hibiscus cannabinus cultivars Fuhong 991, and ZM412 (Li et al., 2013). Other studies on the effect of heavy metals have also reported similar results, which was demonstrated by reduce of plant height after heavy metal treatment (Farid et al., 2013; Jadid et al., 2017). This might indicate that heavy metal contamination in soil inhibits plant growth.

Figure 2.

Effect of Cd stress treatment on plant height in the foxtail millet (S. italica) accession Buru Merah after 4 weeks of Cd stress treatment. Different letters indicate statistically differences at p value < .05.

10.1177_11786221221114310-fig2.tif

Figure 3.

Morphological appearance of the foxtail millet (S. italica) accession Buru Merah in response to Cd stress treatment ((A) non-treated plant; (B–D) plants treated with 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 µM, respectively).

10.1177_11786221221114310-fig3.tif

In addition, Cd stress was found to cause a significant reduction in the root length of S. italica. The lowest average root length (14.13 cm) was observed in S. italica treated with 1.5 µM Cd and was approximately 45.9% lower than that of the non-treated plants (26.1 cm) (Figure 4). A minimum impact on root length (21.91 cm) was observed in S. italica plants treated with 0.5 µM Cd (Figure 5). Inhibition of root growth is an indicator of the effect of heavy metal stress (Jadid et al., 2017). Root growth in S. italica var. Jingu-21 has been reported to decrease after treatment with 200 µM Cd (Tian et al., 2017). Reduction in root growth which is demonstrated by a reduced root length, by 63.4%, 17.3%, and 69.2%, was also reported for cotton plants, Hibiscus cannabinus var. Fuhong 991 and ZM412, respectively, upon Cd treatment. Root length was reduced in parallel with the increase of Cd concentration (Li et al., 2013). Li et al. (2013) showed that root accumulate higher content of Cd and it was found to be “dose-dependent” and genotype-dependent. Even though all plants showed a decrease of root length after being treated with high concentration of Cd (20–120 µmol/L), their response and level of sensitivity was different (Li et al., 2013).

Figure 4.

Effect of Cd stress treatment on root length of the foxtail millet (S. italica) accession Buru Merah after 4 weeks of Cd stress treatment. Different letters indicate statistically differences at p value <.05.

10.1177_11786221221114310-fig4.tif

Figure 5.

Root architecture of the S. italica accession Buru Merah after Cd stress treatment for 4 weeks. ((A) non-treated plant; (B–D) plants treated with 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 µM, respectively).

10.1177_11786221221114310-fig5.tif

Cd toxicity reduce cellular division in the meristematic tissues. It will lead to reduced root length, plant height, and plant biomass. Bertels et al. (2020) demonstrated that G1/S transition of the cell cycle was inhibited during Cd stress in maize. This leads to a lower proportion of cells in the S stage of plant cell cycle. In addition, Cd stress generates the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). The accumulation of ROS might then cause an oxidative post-translational modification of cyclin D protein and A-type cyclin-dependent kinase (CDKA) (Kintlová et al., 2021).

Cd inhibits the absorption of several macro- and micronutrients, such as P, K, Ca, Fe, and Zn, required by plants via reducing the transporter selectivity (Jiang et al., 2004). Cadmium that enters root cells through these transporters further blocks the entry of other essential metal ions (Caetano et al., 2015; Thomine et al., 2000). Generally, Cd transport occurs via Fe transporters, such as Iron-Regulated metal Transporter-like protein (IRT), yellow stripe-like protein (YSL), and natural resistance-associated macrophage protein (NRAMP), located in the plasma membrane of root epidermal cells (Huang et al., 2020; Ismael et al., 2019; Takahashi et al., 2012). Therefore, similar symptoms are often observed in plants under Cd and Fe stress. Physiological disturbances observed in Fe-deficient plants might result from the perturbation of enzymatic activity and cell metabolism (Dobermann & Fairhurst, 2000; Rout & Sahoo, 2015). In addition, a previous study demonstrated that Cd absorption might interfere with Zn influx into plant cells, and subsequent Zn deficiency might decrease auxin biosynthesis in wheat (Triticum polonicum) (Taiz & Zeiger, 2006; Wanget al., 2017), consequently inhibiting plant root growth (Wang et al., 2017).

Effect of Cd on shoot and leaf number in S. italica

Cd stress significantly affected the number of leaves and shoots in Buru Merah (p < .05). The lowest average number of leaves was 6.11 and was obtained from plants treated with 1.5 µM Cd. It was 46.08% lower than that in the non-treated plants. A decrease in the number of leaves by 35.29% and 28.43%, compared to that in control plants, was seen in S. italica plants treated with 0.5 and 1.0 µM Cd, respectively (Figure 6).

Figure 6.

Effect of Cd stress treatment on the number of shoots and leaves in the foxtail millet (S. italica) accession Buru Merah after 4 weeks of Cd stress treatment. Different letters indicate statistically differences at p value <.05.

10.1177_11786221221114310-fig6.tif

Similar to other parameters, S. italica plants treated with 1.5 µM Cd had the lowest number of shoots, which was 0.89 or 69.23% lower than that in the control plants (Figure 6). Our results indicated that the negative effect of Cd stress on the number of shoots and leaves in Buru Merah was dose-dependent. At higher Cd concentrations, the negative effects were more pronounced. This is in line with the results of a previous study conducted by Farooq et al. (2016), who found that a high concentration of Cd (5 µM) reduced the number of leaves of cotton plants by approximately 72.12% compared to that of non-treated plants. The low number of leaves formed in Cd-treated plants could be due to Cd-mediated inhibition of plant cell division (Abdolali et al., 2015).

Upon entering the cell, Cd interacts with the sulfhydryl group (-SH) on the cysteine residue present in the tubulin protein. This can perturb the formation of microtubules and consequently inhibit plant cell division (Abdolali et al., 2015). Monteiro et al. (2012) revealed that low concentrations of Cd treatment (1 µM) block the checkpoint process of cell division in the G2/M phase, while at higher concentrations (10 µM), it inhibits the S phase of cell division, further affecting plant organogenesis in lettuce plant (Huybrechts et al., 2019). A study performed by Monteiro et al. (2012) demonstrated that the formation and multiplication of shoots and leaves decrease with increasing Cd concentration. Application of 10 µM Cd in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) reduced the proliferative index (PRI) by 25% compared to that in the control.

The toxicity of plant under Cd contamination is characterized by the generation of ROS. Therefore, mechanism of ROS scavenging is crucial. An increased of antioxidant enzymes such as glutathione-S-transferase (GST) as well as P450 enzymes has been described in rice and in Medicago truncatula (Ogawa et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2013). In addition, production of ROS triggers upregulation of several genes which are involved in the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites (Khanna, Jamwal, Sharma, et al., 2019). It includes Phenylalanine Amonia Lyase (PAL), Shikimate O-Hydroxycinnamoyltransferase (HCT), Cinnamoyl-CoA reductase (CCR) (Kintlová et al., 2021).

Effect of Cd treatment on S. italica panicle biomass

Cd treatment significantly affected S. italica panicle biomass (p < .05) (Figures 7 and 8). Treatment with 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 µM Cd for 4 weeks decreased the panicle biomass by 58.9%, 62.55%, and 68.8%, respectively, compared to that in the control plants (Figure 7). A previous study conducted by Wei et al. (2005) showed that Cd contamination caused reduction of plant biomass of Solatium nigrum. Similar results were also demonstrated in Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L. cultivar Fuhong991) and ZM412 after Cd treatment at 120 µM for 3 weeks (Li et al., 2013).

Figure 7.

Effect of Cd stress treatment on panicle biomass of the foxtail millet (S. italica) accession Buru Merah after 4 weeks of Cd stress treatment. Different letters indicate statistically differences at p value < .05.

10.1177_11786221221114310-fig7.tif

Figure 8.

Morphology of the S. italica panicle 28 days after treatment (DAT) ((A) non-treated S. italica plant, (B) 0.5 µM, (C) 1.0 µM, (D) 1.5 µM of Cd).

10.1177_11786221221114310-fig8.tif

In addition, He et al. (2017) reported that cadmium (Cd) stress at a high concentration range can cause biomass reduction, chlorosis, necrosis, and disruption of homeostasis in plant organs. Consequently, it inhibits the rate of metabolism in cells, thereby reducing the productivity of plants.

Effect of Cd treatment on chlorophyll content of S. italica

In this present study, Cd treatment significantly affected the total chlorophyll content of Buru Merah (p < .05) (Table 1). The lowest chlorophyll content was observed in S. italica plants treated with 1.0 µM and 1.5 µM Cd (0.16 mg/g). Our statistical analysis demonstrated that there was no significant difference between the total chlorophyll contents of foxtail millets treated with 1.0 µM and 1.5 µM Cd. A decrease in chlorophyll content corroborated the morphological observations in foxtail millet leaves. We observed chlorosis symptoms in the leaves of Cd-treated foxtail millet compared to those in the green healthy leaves of control plants (Figure 9). Data on chlorophyll content were consistent with our previous data on panicle biomass. This suggests that Cd stress inhibits the photosynthesis rate of plants and consequently reduces their productivity.

Table 1.

Effect of 4 Weeks of Cd Stress Treatment on Chlorophyll Content of the S. italica Accession Buru Merah.

10.1177_11786221221114310-table1.tif

Figure 9.

Foxtail millet S. italica accession Buru Merah after exposure to Cd in 28 DAT. (A)non-treated plants, (B) 0.5 µM Cd treatment, (C) 1.0 µM Cd treatment, and (D) 1.5 µM Cd treatment.

10.1177_11786221221114310-fig9.tif

A decrease in total chlorophyll levels has been observed in other studies as well—the chlorophyll content of Pisum sativum decreased by 31.7% after treatment with 6 mM Cd (Januskaitene, 2012), that of corn (Zea mays L.) decreased by 37.3% at 20 µM Cd concentration (Wang et al., 2009), while that of Phragmites australis decreased by 62.7% at 100 µM Cd concentration (Pietrini et al., 2010). Exposure to Cd-contaminated soils has been reported to cause chloroplast structural abnormalities. Changes in the structure of chloroplasts in Cd-stressed plant cells are caused by swelling of the thylakoid structure. Membrane integrity of the thylakoid membrane is also affected (Baryla et al., 2001; Najeeb et al., 2011). In addition, a decrease in the number of chloroplasts, accumulation of grana, decreased levels of starch grains (SG), and accumulation of Postaglobuli (PG) have been reported in several other plants for instance, Pircis divarticata (75 µM Cd, 14 days after treatment (DAT)) (Ying et al., 2010), Hordeum vulgare (5 µM Cd, 15 HSP) (Wang et al., 2011), and Brassica (Elhiti et al., 2012). These results suggest that the effect of Cd might be species- or genotype-dependent (Parmar et al., 2013).

Cadmium can also cause changes in chlorophyll pigments by replacing the Mg2+ ions in protoporphyrinogen. Consequently, the chlorophyll will be non-functional (Cd-Chl) (Parmar et al., 2013). Decreased chlorophyll levels can also occur due to Cd-mediated suppression of the activity of the δ;-minolevunilic acid dehydratase (ALAD) enzyme, which plays an important role in chlorophyll biosynthesis (Rout & Sahoo, 2015; Sarangthem et al., 2011). In addition, some enzymes which are involved in the biosynthesis of chlorophyll are also inhibited during Cd contamination. It includes chlorophyll synthase, rubisco, protochlorophyllide reductase, and chlorophyllase (Khanna, Jamwal, Gandhi, et al., 2019).

Conclusions

Our study focused on the effect of Cd stress on morpho-physiological characteristics of foxtail millet var. Buru Merah. Cd toxicity is characterized by reduce of some morphological parameters such as plant height, root length, number of leaves, and number of shoots. In addition, physiological parameters including panicle biomass and chlorophyll content are also affected. Highest concentration of Cd used in this study demonstrated the most reduction of both morphological and physiological parameters. Nevertheless, this study could be taken forward toward investigation of other physiological and molecular parameters underlying plant defense mechanism under Cd contamination. Also, biochemical assessment could be further conducted to enrich the understanding of the effect of Cd contamination on foxtail millet. Our study demonstrated the importance of controlling the Cd contamination in the environment. Understanding the effect of Cd contamination on plant growth and development is essential not only for sustainable management in agricultural system and global food security, but also important for environmental conservation of water resources and human health.

Declaration of conflicting interests The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember (ITS), Surabaya, Indonesia for this work, under project scheme of the publication writing and IPR incentive program (PPHKI).

REFERENCES

1.

Abdolali A. , Ngo H. H. , Guo W. , Zhou J. L. , Du B. , Wei Q. , Wang X. C. , Nguyen P. D. (2015). Characterization of a multi-metal binding biosorbent: Chemical modification and desorption studies. Bioresource Technology, 193, 477–487. Google Scholar

2.

Abozeid A. , Ying Z. , Lin Y. , Liu J. , Zhang Z. , Tang Z. (2017). Ethylene improves root system development under cadmium stress by modulating superoxide anion concentration in Arabidopsis thaliana. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8(8), 253–260.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00253 Google Scholar

3.

Baryla A. , Carrier P. , Franck F. , Coulomb C. , Sahut C. , Havaux M. (2001). Leaf chlorosis in oilseed rape plants (Brassica napus) grown on cadmium-polluted soil: Causes and consequences for photosynthesis and growth. Planta, 212, 696–709.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s004250000439 Google Scholar

4.

Bertels J. , Huybrechts M. , Hendrix S. , Bervoets L. , Cuypers A. , Beemster G.T.S. (2020). Cadmium inhibits cell cycle progression and specifically accumulates in the maize leaf meristem. Journal of Experimental Botany, 71(20), 6418–6428.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraa385 Google Scholar

5.

Bruno L. , Pacenza M. , Forgione I. , Lamerton L. R. , Greco M. , Chiappetta A. , Bitonti M. B. (2017). In Arabidopsis thaliana cadmium impact on the growth of primary root by altering SCR expression and auxin-cytokinin cross-talk. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8(1323), 1323.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01323 Google Scholar

6.

Caetano S. M. , Menezes R. , Amaral C. , Rodrigues-Pousada C. , Pimentel C. (2015). Repression of the low affinity iron transporter gene FET4: A novel mechanism against cadmium toxicity orchestrated by YAP1 via ROX1. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 290, 18584–18595.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M114.600742 Google Scholar

7.

Cui W. , Fang P. , Zhu K. , Mao Y. , Gao C. , Xie Y. , Wang J. , Shen W. (2014). Hydrogen-rich water confers plant tolerance to mercury toxicity in alfalfa seedlings. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 105, 103–111. Google Scholar

8.

Dharma-Wardana M. W. C. (2018). Fertilizer usage and cadmium in soils, crops and food. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 40, 2739–2759.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-018-0140-x Google Scholar

9.

Dobermann A. , Fairhurst T. (2000). Rice nutrient disorders and nutrients management. Potash and Phosphat Institute of Canada and International Rice Research Institute; Oxford Geographic Prntersn Ptc Ltd. Google Scholar

10.

Elhiti M. , Yang C. , Chan A. , Durnin D. C. , Belmonte M. F. , Ayele B. T. , Tahir M. , Stasolla C. (2012). Altered seed oil and glucosinolate levels in transgenic plants overexpressing the Brassica napus SHOOTMERISTEMLESS gene. Journal of Experimental Botany, 63, 4447–4461. Google Scholar

11.

Farid M. , Shakoor M. B. , Ehsan E. , Ali S. , Zubair M. , Hanif M. A. (2013). Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses in different plant species to Cd stress. International Journal of Chemical and Biochemical Sciences, 3, 53–60. Google Scholar

12.

Farooq M. A. , Ali S. , Hameed A. , Bharwana S. A. , Rizwan M. , Ishaque W. , Farid M. , Mahmood K. , Iqbal Z. (2016). Cadmium stress in cotton seedlings: Physiological, photosynthesis and oxidative damages alleviated by glycinebetaine. South African Journal of Botany, 104, 61–68. Google Scholar

13.

Genchi G. , Sinicropi M. S. , Lauria G. , Carocci A. , Catalano A. (2020). The effects of cadmium toxicity. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(11), 3782. Google Scholar

14.

Gill S. S. , Tuteja N. (2011). Cadmium stress tolerance in crop plants: Probing the role of sulfur. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 6(2), 215–222. Google Scholar

15.

Gupta D. K. , Corpas F. J. , Palma J. M. (2013). Heavy metal stress in Plants. Springer. Google Scholar

16.

Haider F. U. , Liqun C. , Coulter J. A. , Cheema S. A. , Wu J. , Zhang R. , Wenjun M. , Farooq M. (2021). Cadmium toxicity in plants: Impacts and remediation strategies. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 211, 111887. Google Scholar

17.

Herodian S. , Sugiyono S. , Widowati Susila B.A. (2008). Development of buru hotong as alternative food source. Research report of the Institut Pertanian Bogor in cooperation with Indonesian Agency for Agricultural Research and Development.  https://doi.org/10.33964/jp.v17i3.265Google Scholar

18.

He S. , Yang X. , He Z. , Baligar V. C. (2017). Morphological and physiological responses of plants to cadmium toxicity: A review. Pedhosphere, 27(3), 421–438. Google Scholar

19.

Huang X. , Duan S. , Wu Q. , Yu M. , Shabala S. (2020). Reducing cadmium accumulation in plants: Structure-function relations and tissue-specific operation of transporters in the spotlight. Plants, 9(2), 1–18. Google Scholar

20.

Huybrechts M. , Cuypers A. , Deckers J. , Iven V. , Vandionant S. , Jozefczak M. , Hendrix S. (2019). Cadmium and plant development: An agony from seed to seed. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20(16), 1–30. Google Scholar

21.

Ismael M. A. , Elyamine A. M. , Moussa M. G. , Cai M. , Zhao X. , Hu C. (2019). Cadmium in plants: Uptake, toxicity, and its interactions with selenium fertilizers. Metallomics, 11(2), 255–277.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c8mt00247a Google Scholar

22.

Jadid N. , Maziyah R. , Nurcahyani D. D. , Mubarokah N. R. (2017). Growth and physiological responses of some Capsicum frustescens varieties to copper stress [Conference session]. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1854 (pp. 020018–1–020018–7). AIP Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4985409Google Scholar

23.

Jamers A. , Blust R. , De Coen W. , Griffin J. L. , Jones O. A. H. (2013). An omics based assessment of cadmium toxicity in the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Aquatic Toxicology, 126, 355–364. Google Scholar

24.

Januskaitene I. (2012). The effect of cadmium on several photosynthetic parameters of pea (Pisum sativum L.) at two growth stages. Journal of Agriculture, 99, 71–76. Google Scholar

25.

Jia G. , Huang X. , Zhi H. , Zhao Y. , Zhao Q. , Li W. , Chai Y. , Yang L. , Liu K. , Lu H. , Zhu C. , Lu Y. , Zhou C. , Fan D. , Weng Q. , Guo Y. , Huang T. , Zhang L. , Lu T. , . . .Han B. (2013). A haplotype map of genomic variations and genome-wide association studies of agronomic traits in foxtail millet (Setaria italica). Nature Genetics, 45(8), 957–961. Google Scholar

26.

Jiang X. J. , Luo Y. M. , Liu Q. , Liu S. L. , Zhao Q. G. (2004). Effects of cadmium on nutrient uptake and translocation by Indian mustard. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 26, 319–324. Google Scholar

27.

Khan M. A. , Khan S. , Khan A. , Alam M. (2017). Soil contamination with cadmium, consequences and remediation using organic amendments. The Science of the Total Environment, 601– 602, 1591–1605.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.030 Google Scholar

28.

Khanna K. , Jamwal V. L. , Gandhi S. G. , Ohri P. , Bhardwaj R. (2019). Metal resistant PGPR lowered Cd uptake and expression of metal transporter genes with improved growth and photosynthetic pigments in Lycopersicon esculentum under metal toxicity. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 5855. Google Scholar

29.

Khanna K. , Jamwal V. L. , Sharma A. , Gandhi S. G. , Ohri P. , Bhardwaj R. , Al-Huqail A. A. , Siddiqui M. H. , Ali H. M. , Ahmad P. (2019). Supplementation with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) alleviates cadmium toxicity in Solanum lycopersicum by modulating the expression of secondary metabolites. Chemosphere, 230, 628–639. Google Scholar

30.

Khanna K. , Ohri P. , Bhardwaj R. , Ahmad P. (2021). Unsnarling plausible role of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria for mitigating Cd-toxicity from plants: An environmental safety aspect. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. Advance online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-021-10445-9 Google Scholar

31.

Kintlová M. , Vrána J. , Hobza R. , Blavet N. , Hudzieczek V. (2021). Transcriptome response to cadmium exposure in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 629089. Google Scholar

32.

Lapuimakuni S. , Khumaida N. , Ardie S. W. (2018). Short Communication: Evaluation of drought tolerance indices for genotype selection of foxtail millet (Setaria italica). Tropical Drylands, 2(2), 37–40. Google Scholar

33.

Lestari L. A. , Huriyati E. , Marsono Y. (2017). The development of low glycemic index cookie bars from foxtail millet (Setaria italica), arrowroot (Maranta arundinacea) flour, and kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). Journal of Food Science and Technology, 54(6), 1406–1413.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-017-2552-5 Google Scholar

34.

Lichtenthaler H. K. (1987). Chlorophylls and carotenoids: Pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods in Enzymology, 148, 350–382. Google Scholar

35.

Li F. , Qi J. , Zhang G. , Lin L. , Fang P. , Tao A. , Xu J. (2013). Effect of cadmium stress on the growth, antioxidative enzymes and lipid peroxidation in two kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) plant seedlings. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 12(4), 610–620. Google Scholar

36.

Lu L. L. , Tian S. K. , Yang X. E. , Li T. Q. , He Z. L. (2009). Cadmium uptake and xylem loading are active processes in the hyperaccumulator Sedum alfredii. Journal of Plant Physiology, 166(6), 579–587. Google Scholar

37.

Monteiro C. , Santos C. , Pinho S. , Oliveira H. , Pedrosa T. , Dias M. C. (2012). Cadmium-induced cyto- and genotoxicity are organ-dependent in lettuce. Chemical Research in Toxicology, 25, 1423–1434.  https://doi.org/10.1021/tx300039t Google Scholar

38.

Najeeb U. , Jilani G. , Ali S. , Sarwar M. , Xu L. , Zhou W. (2011). Insights into cadmium induced physiological and ultra-structural disorders in Juncus effusus L. and its remediation through exogenous citric acid. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 186, 565–574. Google Scholar

39.

Nisa C. , Jadid N. (2021). Exogenous acetic acid pre-treatment increases drought tolerance of two Indonesian foxtail millet (Setaria italica) accessions. Biodiversitas, 22(4), 2117–2124.  https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d220460 Google Scholar

40.

Ogawa I. , Nakanishi H. , Mori S. , Nishizawa N. K. (2009). Time course analysis of gene regulation under cadmium stress in rice. Plant and Soil, 325, 97–108.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0116-9 Google Scholar

41.

Parmar P. , Kumari N. , Sharma V. (2013). Structural and functional alterations in photosynthetic apparatus of plants under cadmium stress. Botanical Studies, 54(1), 45–46. Google Scholar

42.

Pietrini F. , Zacchini M. , Iori V. , Pietrosanti L. , Ferretti M. , Massacci A. (2010). Spatial distribution of cadmium in leaves and its impact on photosynthesis: Examples of different strategies in willow and poplar clones. Journal of Plant Biology, 12, 355–363. Google Scholar

43.

Prasad M. (2017). The foxtail millet genome. Springer International Publishing. Google Scholar

44.

Rajput R. D. , Patil R. P. (2017). The comparative study on spectrophotometric analysis of chlorophyll and carotenoids pigments from non-leguminous fodder crops. International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering and Technology, 4(7), 140–148. Google Scholar

45.

Rout G. R. , Sahoo S. (2015). Role of iron in plant growth and metabolism. Reviews in Agricultural Science, 3, 1–24.  https://doi.org/10.7831/ras.3.1 Google Scholar

46.

Salinitro M. , Mattarello G. , Guardigli G. , Odajiu M. , Tassoni A. (2021). Induction of hormesis in plants by urban trace metal pollution. Scientific Reports, 11, 20329. Google Scholar

47.

Sánchez-Pardo B. , Carpena R. O. , Zornoza P. (2013). Cadmium in white lupin nodules: Impact on nitrogen and carbon metabolism. Journal of Plant Physiology, 170(3), 265–271. Google Scholar

48.

Sarangthem J. , Jain M. , Gadre R. (2011). Inhibition of δ;-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase activity by cadmium in excised etiolated maize leaf segments during greening. Plant Soil and Environment, 57(7), 332–337. Google Scholar

49.

Sher A. , Mudassir Maqbool M. , Iqbal J. , Nadeem M. , Faiz S. , Noor H. , Hamid Y. , Yuan X. , Pingyi G. (2021). The growth, physiological and biochemical response of foxtail millet to atrazine herbicide. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 28(11), 6471–6479. Google Scholar

50.

Taiz L. , Zeiger E. (2006). Lecture Text Plant Physiology (4th ed.). Sinauer Associates, Inc Publishers. Google Scholar

51.

Takahashi R. , Ishimaru Y. , Senoura T. , Shimo H. , Ishikawa S. , Arao T. , Nakanishi H. , Nishizawa N. K. (2012). The OsNRAMP1 iron transporter is involved in Cd accumulation in rice. Journal of Experimental Botany, 62(14), 4843–4850. Google Scholar

52.

Templeton D. M. , Liu Y. (2010). Multiple roles of cadmium in cell death and survival. Chemico-Biological Interactions, 188(2), 267–275. Google Scholar

53.

Thomine S. , Wang R. , Ward J. M. , Crawford N. M. , Schroeder J. I. (2000). Cadmium and iron transport by members of a plant metal transporter family in Arabidopsis with homology to Nramp genes. Proceedings of National Academy of Science of United States America, 97(9), 4991–4996. Google Scholar

54.

Tian B. , Zhang Y. , Jin Z. , Liu Z. , Pei Y. (2017). Role of hydrogen sulfide in the methyl jasmonate response to cadmium stress in foxtail millet. Frontiers in Bioscience, 22, 530–538. Google Scholar

55.

Tran T. A. , Popova L. P. (2013). Functions and toxicity of cadmium in plants: recent advances and future prospects. Turkish Journal of Botany, 37, 1–13. Google Scholar

56.

Tupan C. 1. , Uneputty P. A. (2017). Concentration of heavy metal lead (Pb) and cadmium (Cd) in water, sediment and seagrass Thalassia hemprichii in Ambon Island Water. AACL Bioflux, 10(6), 1610–1617. Google Scholar

57.

Verma S. , Srivastava S. , Tiwari N. (2015). Comparative study on nutritional and sensory quality of barnyard and foxtail millet food products with traditional rice products. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 52(8), 5147–5155.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-014-1617-y Google Scholar

58.

Wang F. , Chen F. , Cai Y. , Zhang G. , Wu F. (2011). Modulation of exogenous glutathione in Ultrastructure and photosynthetic performance against Cd stress in the two barley genotypes differing in Cd tolerance. Biological Trace Element Research, 144(1–3), 1275–1288. Google Scholar

59.

Wang H. , Zhao S. C. , Liu R. L. , Zhou W. , Jin J. Y. (2009). Changes of photosynthetic activities of maize (Zea mays) seedlings in response to Cadmium stress. Photosynthetica, 47, 277–283. Google Scholar

60.

Wang Y. , Wang X. , Wang C. , Peng F. , Wang R. , Xiao X. , Zeng J. , Kang H. , Fan X. , Sha L. , Zhang H. , Zhou Y. (2017). Transcriptomic profiles reveal the interactions of Cd/Zn in dwarf polish wheat (Triticum polonicum L.) roots. Frontiers in Physiology, 8, 168. Google Scholar

61.

Wei S. , Zhou Q. , Wang X. , Zhang K. , Guo G. , Ma L. Q. (2005). A newly-discovered Cd-hyperaccumulator Solanum nigrum L. Chinese Science Bulletin, 50, 33–38. Google Scholar

62.

Xue Z. C. , Gao H. Y. , Zhang L. T. (2013). Effects of cadmium on growth, photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll content in leaves of soybean seedlings. Biologia Plantarum, 57(3), 587–590. Google Scholar

63.

Ying R. R. , Qiu R. L. , Tang Y. T. , Hu P. J. , Qiu H. , Chen H. R. , Shi T. H. , Morel J. L. (2010). Cadmium tolerance of carbon assimilation enzymes and chloroplast in Zn/Cd hyperaccumulator Picris divaricata. Journal of Plant Physiology, 167, 81–87. Google Scholar

64.

Yulita K. S. , Ridwan R. (2018). Molecular characterization of induced mutation of jewawut (Setaria italica ssp. italica) from Buru Island, Indonesia using SRAP. Biodiversitas, 19(3), 1160–1168. Google Scholar

65.

Zhang G. , Liu X. , Quan Z. , Cheng S. , Xu X. , Pan S. , Xie M. , Zeng P. , Yue Z. , Wang W. , Tao Y. , Bian C. , Han C. , Xia Q. , Peng X. , Cao R. , Yang X. , Zhan D. , Hu J. , . . .Wang J. (2012). Genome sequence of foxtail millet (Setaria italica) provides insights into grass evolution and biofuel potential. Nature Biotechnology, 30(6), 549–554. Google Scholar

66.

Zhang Y. , Liu J. , Zhou Y. , Gong T. , Wang J. , Ge Y. (2013). Enhanced phytoremediation of mixed heavy metal (mercury)-organic pollutants (trichloroethylene) with transgenic alfalfa co-expressing glutathione S-transferase and human P450 2E1. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 260, 1100–1107.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.06.065 Google Scholar
© The Author(s) 2022
Nurul Jadid, Ira Puspaningtyas, Adillatul Lathiifatun Jannah, Chusnul Eka Safitri, and Vidya Hana Dameria Hutahuruk "Growth Responses of Indonesian Foxtail Millet (Setaria italica (L.) Beauv.) to Cadmium Stress," Air, Soil and Water Research 15(1), (29 July 2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/11786221221114310
Received: 28 December 2021; Accepted: 24 June 2022; Published: 29 July 2022
KEYWORDS
agriculture
cadmium stress
cereal food
foxtail millet
growth responses
Heavy metal
sustainable food production
Back to Top