Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
16 December 2021 Size Related Differences in Organic and Mineral Components of Molluscan Shell
Stephanie R. Richard, Robert S. Prezant
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The organic component of the molluscan shell allows for orderly biomineralization and ensures structural integrity that is crucial to survival. This organic contribution to the shell typically composes 2-5% of the total adult shell by weight. Because macro- and microstructure of the shell is known to vary with ontogeny and across taxa, we examined if the organic to mineral ratio components in shell also varied with growth across taxa. To assess intraspecific differences in the organic to mineral ratio of the shell during growth, we examined ratios in three marine [Crepidula fornicata (Linnaeus, 1758), Littorina littorea (Linnaeus, 1758), and Littorina saxatilis (Olivi, 1792)] and two freshwater [Corbicula fluminea (Müller, 1774) and Bellamya chinensis (Gray, 1834)] mollusks across size ranges. In the marine gastropods, the average organic component by weight of the small size class was significantly larger than the average organic proportions of the medium and large size classes. The smallest size class of L. saxatilis had an average shell organic proportion of 11.12%, while the smallest size classes of C. fornicata (3.53%) and L. littorea (2.60%) had percentages below 5%. The smallest size class of C. fluminea had a greater average shell organic proportion than the largest size class (6.19% vs 2.68% organics). Adult specimens of B. chinensis had an average shell organic proportion of 3.93%, while in utero shelled juveniles had an average of 10.05%. In both freshwater and marine species, the smallest size class had a greater organic proportion. As the organic matrix is energetically more expensive than the calcified shell portion, we hypothesize that energy expended in these smaller (usually pre-reproductive maturity) stages of growth allows for a more rapid production of shell and that this “expense” is a valuable trade-off for the protection the shell offers young mollusks.

The molluscan shell is typically composed of 2-5 calcified layers plus an external organic periostracum (Marin et al. 2012). The calcified layers, which naturally occur as aragonite, calcite, and (rarely) vaterite (Nebel and Epple 2008), have an organic infrastructure, or organic matrix that comprises a small percentage of the shell and is of fundamental importance to the orderly biomineralization of the shell.

This organic matrix, typically making up 2-5% of the adult mollusk shell, has been suggested to act as a calcification inhibitor and a regulator for shell growth, shell structure (macro and micro), crystal nucleation, and crystal orientation (Suzuki et al. 2017). The organic matrix is composed of lipids, proteins, and polysaccharides such as chitin (Suzuki et al. 2017), and forms the periostracum, intracrystalline matrix, and intercrystalline matrix (Marin et al. 2012). For example, organic components both surround nacre tablets as the intercrystalline matrix and are found within tablets as the intracrystalline matrix (Marin et al. 2013). The typically thin periostracum helps prevent corrosion of the calcified shell, but also serves to inhibit the invasion of parasitic/boring organisms, provides a foundation for shell growth, may assist in camouflaging the animal, and aids in sealing the extrapallial space, which is instrumental in mineral deposition that furthers shell growth (Watabe 1988, Marin et al. 2012, Clark et al. 2020).

In ocean habitats, where carbonate and calcium ions are abundant, physiological regulation is required to use those components to form structurally strong and organized shells. Orderly biomineralization and microstructure are imperative within the molluscan shell and here the organic matrix is, in large part, responsible (Wheeler and Sikes 1984). With that, we question if the proportion of organic to mineral components in the mollusk shell changes with shell size?

Nearly 50% of metabolic energy expended in producing the shell is associated with the organic matrix (Palmer 1992). Contributing half the total energy allocated for shell production to creating such a small component (< 5%) could seem out of proportion, but not when considering the essential roles of the organic matrix and the fact that metabolic rates are typically higher in younger animals than older (Schöne 2008, Butler et al. 2011, Glazier et al. 2015, Suzuki et al. 2017, Ruiz et al. 2018).

Most of the relevant literature suggests that the proportion of shell organics in mollusks hovers around 5% or less by weight (Weiner and Traub 1984, Glover and Kidwell 1993, Marin et al. 2007, De Paula and Silveira 2009, Marin et al. 2012, Osuna-Mascaró et al. 2014, Clark et al. 2020). Using chemical extraction with 0.1 M trichloroacetic acid, Goulletquer and Wolowicz (1989) determined that shell organic material comprised 5.16% and 9.60% of the total organism organics (body + shell) for Cardium glaucum (Bruguière, 1789) and Cardium edule (Linnaeus, 1758), respectively. Price et al. (1976) found organic percentages in shells ranged from 1.4% in Argopecten irradians (Lamarck, 1819), a species with a very thin periostracum, to 21.4% in Solemya velum (Say, 1822), a species with an extensive periostracum. The periostracum alone in S. velum likely accounts for the large organic content. This would not necessarily reflect a change in intra- or intercrystalline organic matrix with growth but a change in the proportion associated with the periostracal cover. However, some suggest that younger mollusks have a larger organic proportion within their shells (Price et al. 1976, Goulletquer and Wolowicz 1989, Prezant et al. 2006, Thomsen et al. 2013). The shell organic material in younger individuals of Mytilus edulis (Linnaeus, 1758) was on average greater than 10% by weight of the shell, while adult individuals of the same species had shell organic content ranging from 1 to 6% (Thomsen et al. 2013).

Preliminary work by the current authors found that the organic proportion in the shells of the freshwater Asian clam Corbicula fluminea (Müller, 1774) decreased with age. This suggests a proportional decrease in organic shell component with growth. In this study, we expand on this work to determine if the relative proportion of organic to mineral component in mollusks decreases as they grow/age using various common species from freshwater and marine coastal mid-Atlantic sites [marine gastropods Crepidula fornicata (Linnaeus, 1758), Littorina littorea (Linnaeus, 1758), and Littorina saxatilis (Olivi, 1792), along with freshwater gastropod Bellamya chinensis (Gray, 1834)]. We hypothesized that the proportion of organic to mineral components associated with the shell decreases with age and ontogenetic size.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Specimens of both freshwater and marine mollusks from southern Connecticut, USA, were collected and processed to determine relative proportions of organic to mineral components in shells through growth. Individual methodologies for these groups are comparable but are detailed below.

Corbicula fluminea

Specimens of the freshwater bivalve Corbicula fluminea were collected in shallow, slow moving waters of the Wepewaug River in Eisenhower Park, Milford, Connecticut, USA (41°15′0″N, 73°3′25″W), on 8 September 2018. All organisms used in this study were collected under Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection permit no. 1821006 and all were from large populations. Clams were found burrowed beneath or just at the surface of sandy sediments. Clam shell length ranged from 7.8 – 8.1 mm in the small size class, 10.4 – 11.4 mm in the medium size class, and 15.1 – 16.1 mm in the large size class (Table 1). Clams were maintained in small aquaria using river water at ambient room temperature through 4 December 2018 and acted as a control group for an unpublished study performed by the authors. They were preserved in 70% ethanol on 4 December 2018. Wet weight (nearest 0.0001 g), length (nearest 0.01 mm), height (nearest 0.01 mm), and breadth (nearest 0.01 mm) measurements were recorded (after preservation) with an analytical balance and caliper respectively (Kosnik et al. 2006).

Table 1.

Size (length in mm) ranges for specimens of Crepidula fornicata, Littorina littorea, Littorina saxatilis, Corbicula fluminea, and Bellamya chinensis.

img-z2-13.gif_23.gif

Soft tissues were carefully extracted from shells using forceps. Shells surfaces were dried with soft, lintless tissue, wet-weighed and heat dried at 100°C for 24 hours (Ricciardi and Bourget 1998). The shells were removed from the oven and reweighed to determine dry weight. All shells were stored in a desiccator after drying.

Prior to combustion to determine shell organic content, each shell was crushed with a mortar and pestle and placed individually in a pre-weighed crucible. The overall mass of the crucible and the shell was recorded. The crucible was then placed in a combustion oven at 550°C for 60 minutes (Prezant et al. 2006). Crucibles were removed from the oven, and briefly cooled to room temperature to allow weighing to determine post-combustion weight. Percent shell organic content was determined with the following formula: ((mass of dried shell – mass of combusted shell)/mass of dried shell) (Prezant et al. 2006).

Bellamya chinensis

Specimens of the viviparid gastropod Bellamya chinensis were collected from shallow waters of Mondo Ponds, Milford, CT (41°13′6″N, 73°5′20″W) on 8 July 2020. Nine females and 6 males were collected. The substratum from the collection site was smooth rock surfaces covered with short epiphytes and nearby muddy, soft sediments. Snails were brought to the laboratory and shells were cleaned of surficial epibionts and then manually cracked before placing specimens in 70% ethanol to ensure internal penetration of the preservative. Animal wet weight (nearest 0.0001 g) along with shell length (nearest 0.01 mm) and width (nearest 0.01 mm) were recorded with an analytical balance and caliper respectively after animals were preserved in 70% ethanol (Kosnik et al. 2006). After preservation, specimens were sorted based on sex and any shelled juvenile gastropods found in utero were removed and placed in separate vial of 70% ethanol. Developing juveniles were found in eight of the nine adult female gastropods collected. All in utero specimens had shell length, width, and wet weight recorded using an ocular micrometer and analytical balance, respectively. In utero gastropods were separated into three mixed size groups with an even distribution of different shell lengths ranging from 3.7 mm to 9.0 mm in shell length. Adult and in utero groups were treated the same as the specimens previously described to determine shell organic proportion. Average shell organic proportions of B. chinensis were compared based on sex as well as size class.

Marine gastropods

Specimens of various sized coastal gastropods Crepidula fornicata, Littorina littorea, and Littorina saxatilis were collected from or near the intertidal zone at Silver Sands Beach, Milford, Connecticut, USA (41°11′49.5″N 73°04′11.9″W). Specimens of C. fornicata and L. saxatilis were collected on 25 May 2019. Additional specimens of L. saxatilis plus specimens of L. littorea were collected on 6 October 2019. Specimens were preserved in 70% ethanol in the field upon collection either on 25 May 2019 or 6 October 2019.

Figure 1.

(A) Length (mm) vs. percent organics and (B) wet weight (g) vs. percent organics averages measured in the shell of Crepidula fornicata.

img-z3-8.jpg_23.jpg

Thirty specimens were chosen randomly and placed in categories of “small,” “medium,” and “large,” with 10 individuals in each size class. The determination of gastropod sizes used was based on the relative size range within populations sampled (Table 1).

The presence of barnacles and other epibionts on littorines were noted and photographed before and after ultrasonic bath treatment. Ultrasonic bath treatment was completed to help remove any epibionts left after manual removal. Any epibionts remaining after sonication were carefully removed prior to weighing the gastropods. Wet weight (nearest 0.0001 g), length (nearest 0.01 mm), and width (nearest 0.01 mm) were recorded with an analytical balance and caliper respectively after specimens were preserved (Kosnik et al. 2006). Organic proportion was determined using the same methodology as previously described.

Statistical analysis

Length (mm) vs. percent organics and wet weight (g) vs. percent organics were plotted and a linear regression was produced for the marine gastropods and Corbicula fluminea, resulting in R2, slope, and p-values for each graph. A one-way ANOVA was performed using Microsoft Excel (Edis et al. 2018, Huang and Shih 2020) to assess if there were intraspecific differences present in the percent organic for the marine gastropods and C. fluminea. Tukey's honest significance post-hoc test was performed to assess pair-wise differences between size classes within each species.

Figure 2.

(A) Length (mm) vs. percent organics and (B) wet weight (g) vs. percent organics averages measured in the shell of Littorina littorea.

img-z4-1.jpg_23.jpg

Figure 3.

(A) Length (mm) vs. percent organics and (B) wet weight (g) vs. percent organics averages measured in the shell of Littorina saxatilis.

img-z4-3.jpg_23.jpg

A one-way ANOVA test was performed on Microsoft Excel (Edis et al. 2018, Huang and Shih 2020) in order to test if there was a significant difference between the shell organic proportions measured in male and female Bellamya chinensis individuals.

RESULTS

As wet weight and length increased, shell organic proportion decreased for Crepidula fornicata (length, R2 = 0.549, m = -0.047x, p < 0.001; wet weight, R2 = 0.328, m = -0.113x, p < 0.001), Littorina littorea (length, R2 = 0.519, m = -0.087, p < 0.001; wet weight, R2 = 0.464, m = -0.400x, p < 0.001), Littorina saxatilis (length, R2 = 0.666, m = -0.813x, p < 0.001; wet weight, R2 = 0.550, m = -11.3x, p < 0.001), and Corbicula fluminea (length, R2 = 0.477, m = -0.411x, p = 0.039; wet weight, R2 = 0.381, m = -1.95x, p = 0.077; Figs. 14). Crepidula fornicata specimens had an average of 3.525 ± 0.401 (st dev) % in the smallest size class, 2.007 ± 0.240% in the medium size class, and 1.934 ± 0.208% in the largest size class. Individuals of L. littorea showed an average of 2.60 ± 0.395% in the smallest size class, then 2.08 ± 0.259% in the medium size class, and 1.97 ± 0.174% in the largest size class. Littorina saxatilis specimens had an average of 11.12 ± 4.31% in the shell organics of the smallest size class, 3.66 ± 0.920% in the medium size class, and 3.06 ± 0.413% in the large size class. Significant differences in shell percent organics were detected within species when comparing the three size classes of Credipula fornicata (One-Way ANOVA, F2,27 = 92.55, p < 0.001), Littorina littorea (One-Way ANOVA, F2,27 = 13.41, p < 0.001), and Littorina saxatilis (One-Way ANOVA, F2,27 = 30.73, p < 0.001).

Figure 4.

(A) Length (mm) vs. percent organics and (B) wet weight (g) vs. percent organics averages measured in the shell of Corbicula fluminea.

img-z5-1.jpg_23.jpg

The smaller specimens of C. fluminea had an average percent organic of 6.19 ± 2.25% with a maximum of 12.07%. Medium and large sized clams had average organic proportions of 3.10 ± 0.545% and 2.68 ± 0.021%, respectively. Significant differences in shell percent organics were detected within species when comparing the three size classes of Corbicula fluminea (One-Way ANOVA, F2,6 = 6.187, p < 0.05).

Figure 5.

Mean percent shell organics in each size class of species analyzed (note: the “small” size class for B. chinensis refers to shelled in utero juveniles, while the “large” size class refers to fully grown adults). Groups marked with different letters were significantly different from one another as indicated by Tukey's honest significance post-hoc test. Specific size classes are denoted in Table 1.

img-z5-5.jpg_23.jpg

Adult specimens of Bellamya chinensis had an average shell organic proportion of 3.93 ± 0.385%. In utero shelled juveniles had shell organic proportions averaging 10.05 ± 3.86%. Sex did not influence adult shell organic proportion (One-Way ANOVA, F1,10 = 1.078, p > 0.05).

Shell organics decrease as the mollusks reach larger sizes (Fig. 5, Table 2). This trend was consistent in each of the five species analyzed. There were no significant differences between the average organic proportion in medium vs large shells in any marine gastropod species (Table 3). There were no significant differences between specimens of L. saxatilis collected in May or October of 2019.

Table 2.

Average shell organic percent for each size class of Crepidula fornicata, Littorina littorea, Littorina saxatilis, Corbicula fluminea, and Bellamya chinensis. s = standard deviation

img-z6-3.gif_23.gif

Table 3.

Tukey's honest significance test (HSD) values. These values test for significant differences in mean shell organic proportions between size classes (within species).

img-z6-5.gif_23.gif

DISCUSSION

The physiological and structural importance of the organic component of molluscan shell has long been recognized (Wheeler and Sikes 1984, Dauphin 2001, Nishida et al. 2011, Suzuki et al. 2017, Jain et al. 2018, Schoeppler et al. 2018, Bruggmann et al. 2019). Similarly, the functional microstructure and ontogenetic changes of shell structure and microstructure are also well known (Kemp and Bertness 1984, Bandel 1991, West and Cohen 1994, Román-González et al. 2017, Checa 2018, Wan et al. 2019). Absent from the literature are details of ontogenetic changes that could take place in the shell's organic matrix with growth and any functional significance of these possible changes.

The current study demonstrates that smaller shells of three species of marine (Crepidula fornicata, Littorina littorea, Littorina saxatilis) and two species of freshwater (Corbicula fluminea, and Bellamya chinensis) mollusks, when compared to larger specimens, have a greater shell organic to mineral ratio. While the shell is the exoskeletal protection of most mollusks through most of their lives, and there is a recognized correlation between shell thickness and shell strength (Zuschin and Stanton 2001, Zuschin et al. 2003, Vasconcelos et al. 2011), we suggest that the proportionally greater percent of organic matrix in juvenile shells lends additional protection to the thinner shells of younger mollusks. The actual source of the higher organic component we believe is primarily from a greater content within the shell's organic matrix and not a proportional change (decrease) in mineral content nor increase in relative periostracal thickness. In specimens used here, the periostracum was typically intact and very thin in littorinid specimens, exceptionally thin to absent in specimens of Crepidula, thin in Corbicula with some umbonal erosion typical, and well developed but also thin in Bellamya with erosion often found in the older parts of the shell. While the thickness, and thus overall weight contribution of the periostracum, could be a variable when considering shell organics and could change over time and age (but only at the growing edge), it is unlikely that this would change the trends in organics seen here since the surface of the forms a uniform “mold” for this outer and proportionally uniform cover in species examined here.

In one of the few reports that examined proportionalities of shell organics, Vinogradov (1953) stated that bivalve shells had a greater organic to mineral content than gastropods, and estuarine and marine mollusks a greater organic content than freshwater mollusks. In addition, periostracum in freshwater mollusks tends to be thicker than those that live in typically warmer ocean waters (Watabe 1988). The results here (albeit limited in species examined) found that specimens of the freshwater bivalve C. fluminea had average organic proportions less than that of the marine gastropod Littorina saxatilis in each size class. However, average organic proportions measured in each of the size classes of C. fornicata and L. littorea were not consistently greater than those of C. fluminea. Neither Vinogradov (1953) nor Watabe's (1988) suggestions regarding the relative proportion of organic shell in marine/estuarine or freshwater environments is supported by the limited data in this study.

Predation and shell organics

A greater proportion of organic matrix in juvenile shells is one possible strategy to increase chances of survival for younger (smaller) mollusks (Prezant et al. 2006) that are threatened by a compromised shell. The organic matrix adds flexibility, adds paths for microfractures (that prevent major shell failure) along inter- and intracrystalline matrices, and increases overall resistance to shell fracture (Li et al. 2017). It is not unusual for juvenile gastropods to be targets of shell cracking or crushing predators, such as the blue crab Callinectes sapidus (Rathbun, 1896), which prefers small specimens of Littorina irrorata (Vaughn and Fisher 1988). With a higher organic proportion in the shells of younger mollusks, a failed and sublethal attack would better support shell repair and survival. In many cases, younger, thinner shelled mollusks can be at higher risk of predation than larger, thicker shelled adults, the latter creating an “ontogenetic refuge” (Harding 2003, Grey et al. 2005). Here, a possible trade-off in distribution of energy towards shell production could better secure early life stages.

Adult C. fornicata are sedentary and are preyed upon by various crabs (Pechenik et al. 2010). The thicker adult shell offers some level of protection not found in juveniles. Vasconcelos et al. (2011) suggest that shell thickness is a strong correlate with shell strength (as demonstrated in species of Mytilidae, Veneridae, and Arcidae). Zuschin and Stanton (2001), however, note that shell size is measured in height, width, and length and thus not necessarily always a direct correlate to shell thickness. As such, care must be taken in drawing too strong a link between overall shell size, rather than shell thickness, as a defense of soft tissue. The association between predation and prey size, in fact, is not universal. Pechenik et al. (2010), for instance, demonstrated that the crab Hemigrapsus sanguineus (De Haan, 1853) preyed heavily upon juveniles of C. fornicata in the lab but the rate of predation increased as juveniles grew. This could be related to consumer energy dynamics and the balance between predation effort and nutritive value of a larger accessible food resource – an example of energy maximization (Griffiths 1975). Similarly, the freshwater crab, Zilchiopsis collastinensis (Pretzmann, 1968) in the Paraná River, Argentina, selectively consumed larger invasive golden mussels, Limnoperna fortuna (Dunker, 1857) despite the extended time needed to gain access to the soft tissue (Torres et al. 2012). It is possible that this is a result of the larger visual cue the larger mussels offer making them more readily available, the difficulty the crabs have handling smaller shells, or a result of optimal foraging (all reviewed by Torres et al. 2012). We have little information relating energy balance, shell development, shell organics, shell size, and predator/prey interaction.

Size and shell thickness does matter for C. fluminea. Predatory crayfish more readily feed upon smaller specimens of the Asian clam (Covich et al. 1981, Pereira et al. 2016). The larger and thicker shells of adult clams offer increased structural resistance for crayfish claws. Pereira et al. (2016) suggest that the preference for smaller clams by the crayfish Procambarus clarkii (Girard, 1852) was related to the greater effort, and thus energy expended, in attempting to open a larger and thicker shelled clam. The cyprinid fish Luciobarbus bocagei (Steindachner, 1864) is only limited in the ingestion of C. fluminea by the diameter of its own oral cavity as these barbels ingest clams in their entirety (Pereira et al. 2016). While not relevant to a predator that consumes the entire animal through a suctorial mouth, for the smaller clams that are preferred by crayfish an interrupted attack that leaves only a partially damaged shell could mean a greater chance for healing and survival.

Development, reproduction and shell organics

Crepidula fornicata can have shells that grow up to 59 mm long and 26 mm wide (Emerson and Jacobson 1976, Prezant et al. 2002). Males that belong to this species usually reach sexual maturity within 2 months of life, measuring around 4 mm in length (Henry et al. 2010). The smallest size class representing this species in this study ranged from 5.9 mm to 10.5 mm; all were presumed to be sexually mature and male. The smallest size class, although sexually mature, still had the greatest shell organic proportion on average in comparison to the other larger size classes. The largest size class of C. fornicata used in this experiment ranged from 35.65 mm to 41.7 mm and were female. The energy allocation shift from growth to reproduction is well documented (for example, see Ishida 2004). For this species, the energy involved in supporting sexual maturity in the smaller males is also much lower than that of the larger females who develop and support large, nutritive ova (Broquet et al. 2015). The larger females also likely distribute energy away from shell growth and towards reproduction as demonstrated by Chaparro and Flores (2002) for Crepidula fedunda (Gallardo, 1979). In the latter, considerable energy is focused on generation of gametes during brooding. Similarly, in Crepidula dilatata (Lamarck, 1822), energy expended on broods increases as the brooding female gets larger (Chaparro et al. 1999). Similar energy trends are seen in Conus pennaceus (Born, 1778) (Perron and Corpuz 1982). The rapid growth of juveniles is essential to produce thicker shells that are more resistant to predation but there is an energy cost. We suggest that with age, maturity and concomitant growth, there is a reallocation of energy from producing proportionally more shell organics to reproduction and gamete and young development.

Predators of C. fornicata might gain entry by cracking the shell proper or dislodging their “footing” from their hard substratum perch, possibly cracking the shell margin in the process. A greater proportion of organic material in the thinner shell of smaller specimens could lend the shell flexibility and resistance to fracture and may be a strategic way to increase survival.

Littorina littorea are oviparous with shells morphology influenced by habitat (Kemp and Bertness 1984). Larvae are planktotrophic with planktonic existence lasting several weeks (Grahame 1973), thus environmental conditions at ultimate settling site can vary. Offspring from the same parent, although closely related genetically, may look different and might have different shell organic proportions reflecting their environmental homes after dispersal. Individuals of L. littorea can grow up to 42 mm in height (Emerson and Jacobson 1976). In this study, the largest specimen used was 20.0 mm. Thus, the mineral to organic ratio throughout the lifespan and full-size range is not documented. Littorina littorea typically reach maturity at about 13 mm in length (Saier 2000) and specimens used here did span each side of that marker with the smallest specimens ranging from 9.4 mm to 11.55 mm in length. The average shell organic proportion found in each size class was within the lower range of the usual 2-5% range, however, the smallest group (assumed sexually immature) had the greatest average shell organic proportion at 2.60% out of the three size classes. This again supports the inverse relationship between relative organic shell content and size and the likelihood that sexually immature individuals allocate a greater proportion of energy towards production of the organic shell component.

Littorina saxatilis is ovoviviparous and also shows developmental plasticity with habitat. Specimens of L. saxatilis that reside in the upper shore of Galician beaches have ridged, banded, and overall larger shells, while those in the lower shore have smooth, non-banded, and smaller shells (Carballo et al. 2005, Conde-Padín et al. 2008). The live-born juveniles must endure the intertidal region of a wave impacted rocky intertidal zone. Clearly here a shell that has structural integrity is crucial. In the upper shore, gastropods are most threatened by predation and heat desiccation, while in the lower shore, wave action is the greatest environmental threat (Conde-Padín et al. 2008). The support, flexibility, and fracture resistance the juvenile organic matrix lends to shells is likely important in this challenging environment.

Adult specimens of Littorina saxatilis can measure up to 18 mm (Emerson and Jacobson 1976). Sexually mature individuals are usually greater than 6 mm in length (Daka and Hawkins 2002). The smallest size class of L. saxatilis analyzed in this work ranged from 5.0 mm to 8.0 mm in length and had organics composing, on average, 11% of the shell. Medium and larger size classes had shell organic proportions within the 2-5% range. There was a significant difference in shell organic proportion between the sexually mature and immature gastropods of this species.

Individuals of the invasive and hermaphroditic freshwater bivalve Corbicula fluminea have been reported to grow to 60 mm in length (Hornbach 1992). Sexual maturity occurs within the first 4 to 6 months of life in clams as small as 6 mm in length (Prezant and Chalermwat 1984). All specimens of C. fluminea analyzed here were sufficiently large to be considered sexually mature. Therefore, no conclusions can be drawn regarding relevant shell organic differences and sexually mature vs immature individuals. The shell lengths in the largest size class of Asian clams examined did not extend up to the maximum recorded shell length. Still, the smallest size class had a greater shell organic proportion than the medium and large size classes.

The viviparous gastropod Bellamya chinensis has been reported to grow to a shell height of 70 mm (Olden et al. 2013). Shells of this species are thick and resistant to desiccation (Olden et al. 2013). Brooding females contain each stage of embryo through juvenile shelled stages within the uterine sac (Prezant et al. 2006). Periostracal hairs measuring up to 0.4 mm are distributed on the surface of shells in utero and in recently released juveniles; these hairs add to the measured organic component that composes the shell (Soes et al. 2011). To our knowledge, other than experimental work done by Prezant et al. (2006) who found newly born juvenile shells to have 13.6% organic content, no other organic measurements of developing, in utero shells representing this species have been reported. Similarly, here we found in utero shells to contain just over 10% organics compared to just under 4% in adult shell. Prezant et al. (2006) suggested that the higher organic shell content in newly released juveniles would be advantageous in mitigating possible predator-induced shell fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

The inverse relationship between total percent organic material vs. mineral component composing the shell of some freshwater and marine mollusks seems robust. This difference is unlikely to be a result of presence of different periostracal thicknesses, erosional loss of periostracum with growth, differential production of periostracum, a decrease in inter- or intracrystalline organic shell material, or a proportional increase in CaCO3 in the shell with growth. None of the species examined here had a thick enough periostracum to account for the trends seen. In addition, changes from proportional erosion and proportional periostracal growth/thickness would not account for the minor influence this outer shell covering might have. With no obvious rationale for a disproportionate increase in mineral content or disproportionate or allometric changes in shell thickness, the change in organic content is most likely due to a greater proportion in organic production compared to mineral material within the smaller, juvenile shell. Ongoing research will focus on extending taxa examined plus determine any correlates between organic/mineral ratios and shell strength and fracture resistance.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Part of this work is derived from an undergraduate honors college research thesis (SR) at Southern Connecticut State University. We would like to thank the thesis committee, Drs. Vince Breslin, Emma Cross and Sean Grace and acknowledge the important statistics support received from Dr. Raymond Mugno. Lastly, thank you to Dr. Gary Dickinson and anonymous reviewers for their important suggested edits. The editorial work of Dr. Wallace M. Meyer made this a substantially improved and more cohesive manuscript. Funding for this work came from Southern Connecticut State University.

LITERATURE CITED

1.

Bandel, K. 1991. Ontogenetic changes reflected in the morphology of the molluscan shell. In: N. Schmidt-Kittler and K. Vogel, eds., Constructional Morphology and Evolution. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Pp. 211–230. Google Scholar

2.

Broquet, T., A. Barranger, E. Billard, A. Bestin, R. Berger, G. Honnaert and F. Viard. 2015. The size advantage model of sex allocation in the protandrous sex-changer Crepidula fornicata: role of mating system, sperm storage, and male mobility. The American Naturalist 186: 404–420. Google Scholar

3.

Bruggmann, S., R. M. Klaebe, C. Paulukat, and R. Frei. 2019. Heterogeneity and incorporation of chromium isotopes in recent marine molluscs (Mytilus). Geobiology 17: 417–435. Google Scholar

4.

Butler, P. G., A. D. Wanamaker Jr., J. D. Scourse, C. A. Richardson, and D. J. Reynolds. 2011. Long-term stability of δ13C with respect to biological age in the aragonite shell of mature specimens of the bivalve mollusk Arctica islandica. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 302: 21–30. Google Scholar

5.

Carballo, M., A. Caballero, and E. Rolán-Alvarez. 2005. Habitat-dependent ecotype micro-distribution at the mid-shore in natural populations of Littorina saxatilis. Hydrobiologia 548: 307–311. Google Scholar

6.

Chaparro, O.R., and M.L. Flores. 2002. Reproductive output of Crepidula fecunda females: distribution of energy in the production of gametes and capsular walls. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 36: 661–673. Google Scholar

7.

Chaparro, O.R., R.F. Oyarzun, A.M. Vergara, and R.J. Thompson. 1999. Energy investment in nurse eggs and egg capsules in Crepidula dilatata Lamarck (Gastropoda, Calyptraeidae) and its influence on the hatching size of the juvenile. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 232: 261–274. Google Scholar

8.

Checa, A. G. 2018. Physical and biological determinants of the fabrication of molluscan shell microstructures. Frontiers in Marine Science 5: 353. Google Scholar

9.

Clark, M. S., L. S. Peck, J. Arivalagan, T. Backeljau, S. Berland, J. C. R. Cardosa, C. Caurcel, G. Chapelle, M. De Noia, S. Dupont, K. Gharbi, J. I. Hoffman, K. S. Last, A. Marie, F. Melzner, K. Michalek, J. Morris, D. M. Power, K. Ramesh, T. Sanders, K. Sillanpää, V. A. Sleight, P. J. Stewart-Sinclair, K. Sundell, L. Telesca, D. L. J. Vendrami, A. Ventura, T. A. Wilding, T. Yarra, and E. M. Harper. 2020. Deciphering mollusc shell production: The roles of genetic mechanisms through to ecology, aquaculture and biomimetics. Biological Reviews 95: 1812–1837. Google Scholar

10.

Conde-Padín, P., M. Carballo, A. Caballero, and E. Rolán-Alvarez. 2008. The relationship between hatching rate and number of embryos of the brood pouch in Littorina saxatilis. Journal of Sea Research 60: 223–225. Google Scholar

11.

Covich, A.P, L.L. Dye and J.S. Mattice. 1981. Crayfish predation on Corbicula under laboratory conditions. The American Midland Naturalist 105: 181–188. Google Scholar

12.

Daka, E. R. and S. J. Hawkins. 2002. Reproductive effects of heavy metals on the rough periwinkle Littorina saxatilis (Mollusca: Prosobranchia). Indian Journal of Marine Sciences 31: 218–224. Google Scholar

13.

Dauphin, Y. 2001. Comparative studies of skeletal soluble matrices from some scleractinian corals and molluscs. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 28: 293–304. Google Scholar

14.

De Paula, S. M., and M. Silveira. 2009. Studies on molluscan shells: Contributions from microscopic and analytical methods. Micron 40: 669–690. Google Scholar

15.

Edis, K. J. C., F. S. Basay, V. L. T. Castillo, D. R. Alegado, A. Alicante, J. M. Alon, R. Garcia, F. Gepiga, and J. P. Picardal. 2018. In vitro evaluation of the molluscicidal activity of Euphorbia tirucalli latex extract against the mollusk rice pest Pomacea canaliculata (Caenogastropoda: Ampullariidae). Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences 13: 237–245. Google Scholar

16.

Emerson, W. K. and M. K. Jacobson. 1976. Marine Snails. In: W. K. Emerson and M. K. Jacobson, eds., The American Museum of Natural History Guide to Shells: Land, Freshwater, and Marine from Nova Scotia to Florida. Alfred A. Knoff, Inc., New York. Pp. 58, 96. Google Scholar

17.

Glazier, D. S., A. G. Hirst, and D. Atkinson. 2015. Shape shifting predicts ontogenetic changes in metabolic scaling in diverse aquatic invertebrates. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 282: 20142302. Google Scholar

18.

Glover, C.P. and S. M. Kidwell. 1993. Influence of organic matrix on the post-mortem destruction of molluscan shells. The Journal of Geology. 101: 729–747. Google Scholar

19.

Goulletquer, P. and M. Wolowicz. 1989. The shell of Cardium edule, Cardium glaucum, and Ruditapes philippinarum: Organic content, composition, and energy value, as determined by different methods. Journal of Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. 69: 563–572. Google Scholar

20.

Grahame, J. 1973. Breeding energetics of Littorina littorea (L.) (Gastropoda: Prosobranchiata). Journal of Animal Ecology 42: 391–403. Google Scholar

21.

Grey, M., P.G. Lelievre and E.G. Boulding. 2005. Selection for prey shell thickness by the naticid gastropod Euspira lewissii (Naticidae) on the bivalve Protothaca staminea (Veneridae). The Veliger 48: 1–6. Google Scholar

22.

Griffiths, D. 1975. Prey availability and the food of predators. Ecology 56: 1209–1214. Google Scholar

23.

Harding, J.M. 2003. Predation by blue crabs, Callinectes sapidus, on rapa whelks, Rapana venosa: possible natural controls for an invasive species. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 297: 161–177. Google Scholar

24.

Henry, J.J., R. Collin, and K. J. Perry. 2010. The slipper snail, Crepidula: An emerging lophotrochozoan model system. Biological Bulletin 218: 211–229. Google Scholar

25.

Hornbach, D. J. 1992. Life history traits of a riverine population of the Asian clam Corbicula fluminea. The American Midland Naturalist 127: 248–257. Google Scholar

26.

Huang, Y. and Shih, M. 2020. Application of excel spreadsheet for comparative analysis of linearized expressions of kinetics modeling for the adsorption of methylene blue on rice husk. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications 10: 548–554. Google Scholar

27.

Ishida, S. 2004. Life history of the muricid gastropod, Cronia margariticola (Broderip, 1833): growth mode transition with season and sexual maturity. Benthos Research 59: 35–44. Google Scholar

28.

Jain, G., M. Pendola, Y. Huang, D. Gebauer, E. Koutsoumpeli, S. Johnson, and J. S. Evans. 2018. Selective synergism created by interactive nacre framework- Associated proteins possessing EGF and vWA motifs: Implications for mollusk shell formation. Biochemistry 57: 2657–2666. Google Scholar

29.

Kemp, P. and M. D. Bertness. 1984. Snail shape and growth rates: Evidence for plastic shell allometry in Littorina littorea. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 81: 811–813. Google Scholar

30.

Kosnik, M. A., D. Jablonski, R. Lockwood, and P. M Novack-Gottshall. 2006. Quantifying molluscan body size in evolutionary and ecological analyses: Maximizing the return on data-collection efforts. Palaios 21: 588–597. Google Scholar

31.

Li, X.W., H.M. Ji, W. Yang, G.P. Zhang and D.L. Chen. 2017. Mechanical properties of crossed-lamellare structures in biological shells: a review. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 74: 54–71. Google Scholar

32.

Marin, F., G. Luquet, B. Marie, and D. Medakovic. 2007. Molluscan shell proteins: Primary structure, origin, and evolution. Current Topics in Developmental Biology 80: 209–276. Google Scholar

33.

Marin, F., N. Le Roy, and B. Marie. 2012. The formation and mineralization of mollusk shell. Frontiers in Bioscience 4: 1099–1125. Google Scholar

34.

Marin, F., Marie, B., Hamada, S.B., Silva, P., LeRoy, N., Guichard, N., Wolf, S., Montagnant, C., Joubert, C., Piquemal, D., Saulnier, D., and Gueguen, Y. 2013. ‘Shellome’: proteins involved in mollusk shell biomineralization – diversity, functions. In: S. Watabe, K. Maeyama and H. Nagasawa, eds., Recent Advances in Pearl Research. Terrapub Tokyo. Pp. 149–166. Google Scholar

35.

Nebel, H. and M. Epple. 2008. Continuous preparation of calcite, aragonite and vaterite, and of magnesium-substituted amorphous calcium carbonate (Mg-ACC). Journal of Inorganic and General Chemistry 634: 1439–1443. Google Scholar

36.

Nishida, K., R. Nakashima, R. Majima and Y. Hikida. 2011. Ontogenetic changes in shell microstructure in the cold seep-associated bivalve, Conchocele bisecta (Bivalvia: Thyasiridae). Paleontological Research 15: 193–212. Google Scholar

37.

Olden, J. D., L. Ray, M. C. Mims, and M. C. Horner-Devine. 2013. Filtration rates of the non-native Chinese mystery snail (Bellamya chinensis) and potential impacts on microbial communities. Limnetica 32: 107–120. Google Scholar

38.

Osuna-Mascaró, A., T. Cruz-Bustos, S. Benhamada, N. Guichard, B. Marie, L. Plasseraud, M. Corneillat, G. Alcaraz, A. Checa, and F. Marin. 2014. The shell organic matrix of the crossed lamellar queen conch shell (Strombus gigas). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 168: 76–85. Google Scholar

39.

Palmer, A. R. 1992. Calcification in marine molluscs: How costly is it? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 89: 1379–1382. Google Scholar

40.

Pechenik, J. A., O. V. Ambrogio, and S. Untersee. 2010. Predation on juveniles of Crepidula fornicata by two crustaceans and two gastropods. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 384: 91–98. Google Scholar

41.

Pereira, J.L., S. Pinho, A. Ré, P.A. Costa, R. Costa, F. Gonçalves and B.B. Castro. 2016. Biological control of the invasive Asian clam, Corbicula fluminea: can predators tame the beast? Hydrobiologia 779: 209–226. Google Scholar

42.

Perron, F.E. and G.C. Corpuz. 1982. Costs of parental care in the gastropod Conus pennaceus: age-specific changes and physical constraints. Oecologia 55: 319–324. Google Scholar

43.

Prezant, R. S. and K. Chalermwat. 1984. Flotation of the bivalve Corbicula fluminea as a means of dispersal. Science 225: 1491–1493. Google Scholar

44.

Prezant, R. S., C. L. Counts III, and E. J. Chapman. 2002. Mollusca of Assateague Island, Maryland and Virginia: Additions to the fauna, range extensions, and gigantism. The Veliger 45: 337–355. Google Scholar

45.

Prezant, R. S., E. J. Chapman, and A. McDougall. 2006. In utero predator-induced responses in the viviparid snail Bellamya chinensis. Canadian Journal of Zoology 84: 600–608. Google Scholar

46.

Price, T. J., G. W. Thayer, M. W. LaCroix, and G. P. Montgomery. 1976. The organic content of shells and soft tissues of selected estuarine gastropods and pelecypods. Proceedings of the National Shellfisheries Association 65: 26–31. Google Scholar

47.

Ricciardi, A. and E. Bourget. 1998. Weight-to-weight conversion factors for marine benthic invertebrates. Marine Ecology Progress Series 163: 245–251. Google Scholar

48.

Román-González, A., J. D. Scourse, P. G. Butler, D. J. Reynolds, C. A. Richardson, L. S. Peck, T. Brey, and I. R. Hall. 2017. Analysis of ontogenetic growth trends in two marine Antarctic bivalves Yoldia eightsi and Laternula elliptica: Implications for sclerochronology. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 465: 300–306. Google Scholar

49.

Ruiz, T., A. Bec, M. Danger, A. Koussoroplis, J. Aguer, J. Morel, and N. Morel-Desrosiers. 2018. A microcalorimetric approach for investigating stoichiometric constraints on the standard metabolic rate of a small invertebrate. Ecology Letters 21: 1714–1722. Google Scholar

50.

Saier, B. 2000. Age-dependent zonation of the periwinkle Littorina littorea (L.) in the Wadden Sea. Helgoland Marine Research 54: 224–229. Google Scholar

51.

Schoeppler, V., L. Gránásy, E. Reich, N. Poulsen, R. de Kloe, P. Cook, A. Rack, T. Pusztai, and I. Zlotnikov. 2018. Biomineralization as a paradigm of directional solidification: A physical model for molluscan shell ultrastructural morphogenesis. Advanced Materials 30: 1803855. Google Scholar

52.

Schöne, B. R. 2008. The curse of physiology-challenges and opportunities in the interpretation of geochemical data from mollusk shells. Geo-Marine Letters 28: 269–285. Google Scholar

53.

Soes, D. M., G. D. Majoor, and S. M. A. Keulen. 2011. Bellamya chinensis (Gray, 1834) (Gastropoda: Viviparidae), a new alien snail species for the European fauna. Aquatic Invasions 6: 97–102. Google Scholar

54.

Suzuki, M., T. Kogure, and H. Nagasawa. 2017. Studies on the chemical structures of organic matrices and their functions in the biomineralization processes of molluscan shells. AGri-Bioscience Monographs 7: 25–39. Google Scholar

55.

Thomsen, J., I. Casties, C. Pansch, A. Körtzinger, and F. Melzner. 2013. Food availability outweighs ocean acidification effects in juvenile Mytilus edulis: Laboratory and field experiments. Global Change Biology 19: 1017–1027. Google Scholar

56.

Torres, M.V., F. Giri and V. Williner. 2012. Size selective predation on an invasive bivalve, Limnoperna fortuna (Mytilidae), by a freshwater crab, Zilchiopsis collastinensis (Trichodactylidae). Journal of Crustacean Biology 32: 698–710. Google Scholar

57.

Vasconcelos, P., A. Morgado-Andre, C. Morgado-Andre and M.B. Gaspar. 2011. Shell strength and fishing damage to the smooth clam (Callista chione): simulating impacts caused by bivalve dredging. ICES Journal of Marine Science 68: 32–42. Google Scholar

58.

Vaughn, C. C. and F. M. Fisher. 1988. Vertical migration as a refuge from predation in intertidal marsh snails: A field test. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 123: 163–176. Google Scholar

59.

Vinogradov, A. P. 1953. The elementary chemical composition of marine organisms. In: Memoir No. II, Sears Foundation for Marine Research. Yale University, New Haven. Pp. 647. Google Scholar

60.

Wan, C., Y. Ma, and S. N. Gorb. 2019. Compromise between mechanical and chemical protection mechanisms in the Mytilus edulis shell. Journal of Experimental Biology 222(Pt 15): jeb201103. Google Scholar

61.

Watabe, N. 1988. Shell structure. In: E. R. Trueman and M. R. Clarke, eds., The Mollusca, Form and Function. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego. Pp. 69–88. Google Scholar

62.

Weiner S. and W. Traub. 1984. Macromolecules in mollusc shells and their functions in biomineralization. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 304: 425–434. Google Scholar

63.

West, K. and A. Cohen. 1994. Predator-prey coevolution as a model for the unusual morphologies of the crabs and gastropods of Lake Tanganyika. Archiv für Hydrobiologie–Beiheft Ergebnisse der Limnologie 44: 267–283. Google Scholar

64.

Wheeler, A. P and C. S. Sikes. 1984. Regulation of carbonate calcification by organic matrix. American Zoologist 24: 933–944. Google Scholar

65.

Zuschin, M. and R.J. Stanton. 2001. Experimental measurement of shell strength and its taphonic interpretation. Palaios 16: 161–170. Google Scholar

66.

Zuschin, M., M. Stachowitsch and R.J. Stanton. 2003. Patterns and processes of shell fragmentation in modern and ancient marine environments. Earth-Science Reviews 63: 33–82. Google Scholar
Stephanie R. Richard and Robert S. Prezant "Size Related Differences in Organic and Mineral Components of Molluscan Shell," American Malacological Bulletin 38(2), 23-33, (16 December 2021). https://doi.org/10.4003/006.038.0204
Received: 20 September 2020; Accepted: 24 May 2021; Published: 16 December 2021
KEYWORDS
Bivalvia
Calcification
Gastropoda
mollusc shell
organic matrix
Back to Top