Translator Disclaimer
1 March 2011 Impact of the Red Imported Fire Ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on Epigeic Arthropods of Cotton Agroecosystems
Kyle G. Wickings, John Ruberson
Author Affiliations +

The red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta Buren (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), has been studied extensively in its role in aboveground food webs of agroecosystems of the southern United States. There is also a limited body of evidence suggesting that S. invicta may significantly influence the soil fauna. This study examined the influence of fire ants on the arthropod communities at the soil surface of cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L., fields at two field sites operated by the University of Georgia in Athens and Tifton, GA (1 yr at each location). Fire ant abundance was suppressed in large plots with ant-specific hydramethylnon-based bait, and arthropods were collected from treatment and control plots by using pitfall traps during multiple week-long sample periods to measure the abundance of epigeic arthropods. Sampling was conducted from June through September 2006 in Athens and from July through September 2007 in Tifton. Although fire ant suppression decreased the abundance of erythraeid mites and nitidulid beetles at both sites, the majority of effects were site-specific. Other taxa positively associated with fire ants included oribatid mites and gnaphosid and linyphiid spiders. In contrast, the abundance of springtails, earwigs, endomychid beetles, and thrips increased with fire ant suppression. This study demonstrates that S. invicta can significantly influence both pest and beneficial epigeic arthropods and that although fire ants exert clear effects on specific taxa, their effects are not uniform within a given trophic group as members from the same guild were differentially impacted.

© 2011 Entomological Society of America
Kyle G. Wickings and John Ruberson "Impact of the Red Imported Fire Ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on Epigeic Arthropods of Cotton Agroecosystems," Annals of the Entomological Society of America 104(2), 171-179, (1 March 2011).
Received: 27 February 2010; Accepted: 1 October 2010; Published: 1 March 2011

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.

Get copyright permission
Back to Top