Several hypotheses attempt to explain why male genitalia typically diverge rapidly over evolutionary time. Predictions of the lock and key and the sexually antagonistic coevolution hypotheses were tested by studying the functional morphology of several male genitalic traits by freezing copulating pairs of four species of Drosophila: saltans, willistoni, melanogaster, and malerkotliana. Contrary to the predictions of the hypotheses, there were no species-specific differences in female morphology that corresponded to interspecific differences in the morphology of the male surstylus (which pressed and perhaps spread the distal tip of the oviscape), the epandrium (which grasped the external surface of the extended oviscape), and the aedeagus and paraphyses (which, in willistoni, clamped the oviscape). Antagonistic coevolution could possibly explain the diverse male genitalic morphology if female resistance behavior rather than morphology has coevolved with male morphology, but there are reasons doubt this explanation.
How to translate text using browser tools
1 September 2004
Functional Morphology of the Male Genitalia of Four Species of Drosophila: Failure to Confirm Both Lock and Key and Male-Female Conflict Predictions
William G. Eberhard,
Natalia Ramirez
ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE
It is not available for individual sale.
This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
It is not available for individual sale.
Annals of the Entomological Society of America
Vol. 97 • No. 5
September 2004
Vol. 97 • No. 5
September 2004
cryptic female choice
genitalia
lock and key
sexually antagonistic coevolution