Translator Disclaimer
29 October 2014 Characterization of Microsatellite Markers for Pinedrops, Pterospora andromedea (Ericaceae), from Illumina MiSeq sequencing
Author Affiliations +

Pinedrops, Pterospora andromedea Nutt., is a mycoheterotrophic plant and acquires carbon from a photosynthetic plant's mycorrhizal fungus (Leake, 1994). Four species in Rhizopogon Fr. subgenus Amylopogon (A. H. Sm.) Grubisha & Trappe form ectomycorrhizal symbioses with Pinus spp. and are fungal hosts to P. andromedea (Cullings et al., 1996; Bidartondo and Bruns, 2002; Dowie et al., 2011; Hazard et al., 2012; Grubisha et al., 2014b). Pterospora andromedea is a North American endemic in the subfamily Monotropoideae (Ericaceae) and has a broad, disjunct distribution occurring in western and eastern regions (Bakshi, 1959). Eastern populations have always been rare compared to robust western populations; however, the eastern range has recently suffered population declines due to a variety of environmental and anthropogenic factors (Schori, 2002).

Population genetic studies of P. andromedea and the two primary Rhizopogon host species (R. salebrosus A. H. Sm. and R. kretzerae Grubisha, Dowie & Mill.) that are currently being conducted will provide information on evolution and maintenance of this symbiosis. Furthermore, population genetic analyses will be useful in assessing population viability that will aid in conservation efforts of both fungal host and plant. The microsatellite loci described here are the first developed for P. andromedea.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Initial isolation of microsatellite loci followed the enrichment method of Glenn and Schable (2005) as described by Klooster et al. (2009). After cells were plated and incubated, hundreds of positive bacterial colonies with successful insertions were obtained. From these, 144 were individually selected and amplified using PCR with 99 (68%) of the inserts falling within the desired size limits of 500–1100 bp. These were then sequenced and screened for the presence of microsatellite regions. Of these sequenced products, 33 fragments possessed microsatellite loci consisting of di-, tri-, and tetranucleotide repeats ranging from five to 22 repeat units with suitable flanking sequences for primer design. Primers for these 33 loci were designed using Primer3 (Rozen and Skaletsky, 2000) with default parameters. These loci were screened for positive PCR amplification using agarose gel electrophoresis following Klooster et al. (2009). From the 33 loci tested, 19 were chosen for screening using fluorescently labeled (6FAM, VIC, PET, NED; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA) forward primers as described by Klooster et al. (2009). Fragment analysis was conducted using the GeneScan 500 LIZ Size Standard (Applied Biosystems) on an ABI 3730 DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) by the Biotechnology Resource Center (BRC) at Cornell University. Allele sizes were called manually using the Microsatellite Plugin in Geneious version R6.1.5 (Drummond et al., 2011). Only one polymorphic locus was identified (Ptan64; Table 1).

Next-generation sequencing was used as an alternative method for acquiring a large quantity of genomic sequence data from which to identify microsatellite repeats. Silica-dried tissue (150 mg) from one plant collected outside of Laramie, Wyoming (41.25108°N, –105.41298°W) was ground in liquid nitrogen to a fine powder. Genomic DNA (gDNA) was isolated using the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, California, USA). The Genomic DNA Clean & Concentrator Kit (Zymo Research Corporation, Irvine, California, USA) was used to concentrate approximately 600 µL of gDNA into a 30-µL volume. Library preparation and Illumina MiSeq sequencing (Illumina, San Diego, California, USA) were performed at the Advanced Genetic Technologies Centre (AGTC) at the University of Kentucky. Approximately 2 µg of gDNA was sheared using a Bioruptor NGS (UCD-600TS; Diagenode, Denville, New Jersey, USA) by sonicating at 4°C with six cycles of 5 s on and 90 s off. A TruSeq DNA Sample Preparation Kit version 2 (Illumina) was used to generate a paired-end library for Illumina MiSeq sequencing by L.C.G. at the AGTC. MiSeq sequencing resulted in 33,142,988 reads with an average length of 248 bases and 8,228,995,164 total bases. At the AGTC, raw sequence reads were filtered, reformatted, and trimmed using prinseq-lite.pl (Schmieder and Edwards, 2011) and entailed removing (1) duplicate reads, (2) reads with uncalled bases (N) >2% of read length, (3) reads with low-quality scores (Q < 17), (4) very short reads (average length − 2[standard deviation]), and (5) very long reads (average length + 2[standard deviation]). Contigs were assembled de novo using CLC Genomics Workbench version 5.1 (CLC bio, Aarhus, Denmark) by the AGTC producing 2,220,121 contigs, with an average size of 299 bp (N75 = 234, N50 = 330, N25 = 476) and a total of 663,389,430 bases. MSATCOMMANDER version 1.0.8 (Faircloth, 2008) identified the following number of perfect microsatellite repeats from assembled contigs: 12,151 dinucleotide with at least 12 repeat units, 456 trinucleotide with at least eight repeat units, 159 tetranucleotide with at least six repeat units, 65 pentanucleotide with at least six repeat units, and 56 hexanucleotide with at least six repeat units. Within MSATCOMMANDER, Primer3 (Rozen and Skaletsky, 2000) was used to generate primers for all loci using default parameters except that GC clamp = yes, maximum poly X = 3, and an optimum acceptable primer melting temperature of 60°C with a maximum difference of 2°C between forward and reverse primers. To avoid PCR product sizes at 250 bp that would be difficult to size correctly with the DNA standard (LIZ500), in this study PCR product size was set to 90–210 bp or 270–400 bp. The spreadsheet produced by MSATCOMMANDER was used to select a small subset of 63 loci with optimum primer conditions and loci that had no lowercase letters in the primer sequence that would indicate nucleotide mismatches in the assembled reads used to create the contigs.

Table 1.

Characteristics of 13 polymorphic microsatellite loci developed in Pterospora andromedea.

t01_01.gif

Sixty-three loci were screened for positive PCR amplification using agarose gel electrophoresis against four P. andromedea isolates (two each from western and eastern regions; Table 2). PCR was conducted in a 10-µL reaction volume that included 0.1 µM of each forward and reverse primer, 1× CoralLoad PCR Buffer with 1.5 mM MgCl2 (QIAGEN), 200 µM each dNTP, 2.5 units Taq DNA Polymerase (QIAGEN), and 1.0 µL of 1 : 10 diluted genomic DNA. Thermocycler parameters were 94°C for 3 min; 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s; followed by a final extension for 10 min at 72°C. PCR products were visualized in a 2% agarose gel stained with GelRed (Phenix Research Products, Candler, North Carolina, USA) on a UV transilluminator. Thirty-six loci that had one or two bright PCR products on the gels in the approximate expected size range (target size +40 bp, −20 bp) and no PCR bands outside of the expected size range were chosen for further screening.

Populations from Wyoming (n = 18), Washington (n = 17), Michigan (n = 7), and Quebec (n = 13) representing two western and two eastern populations, respectively, were chosen to screen the 36 loci (Table 2). Stem bract and root samples were immediately placed in Ziploc bags with 2–4-mm silica gel beads (Conservation Support Systems, Santa Barbara, California, USA) or preserved using the method of Dowie et al. (2011). Vouchers were deposited at the University of Michigan Herbarium (voucher no. MICH1485963, MICH1485964; Table 2). Plant DNA was isolated from stem bracts and/or roots. Stem bracts were homogenized using 2 × 0.5-mm ceramic beads in a FastPrep FP120 (Savant Bio101, Carlsbad, California, USA). DNA was isolated using the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (QIAGEN). DNA from roots was isolated following Dowie et al. (2011) or Grubisha et al. (2014b). The forward primer for 36 loci was 5′ end-labeled with one of four dyes: NED, VIC, 6FAM, or PET (Applied Biosystems; Table 1). PCR amplification was performed using the QIAGEN Multiplex PCR Kit in a 5-µL volume with 1× QIAGEN Multiplex PCR Master Mix, 50 nM each primer (exceptions noted below), and 0.75 µL of 1:10 diluted genomic DNA. Primers for Ptan1 were used at a concentration of 0.1 µM, 75 nM for Ptan13, Ptan22, and Ptan64, and 35 nM for Ptan25. Touchdown thermocycler conditions were: 95°C for 15 min; 10 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 67°C for 90 s, decreasing 1°C each cycle, and 72°C for 30 s; 25 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 57°C for 90 s, and 72°C for 30 s; with a final extension of 60 min at 60°C. Fragment analysis and genotyping were as described above.

Of the 36 loci tested from the Illumina data with fluorescently labeled primers, 12 (33%) were polymorphic (Table 1), nine (25%) were monomorphic (Table 3), 12 (33%) were not useable due to stutter or anomalous additional peaks, and three (8%) had very weak to no amplification. For the 13 polymorphic loci (12 from Illumina data and one from the enrichment method), number of alleles, observed heterozygosity (Ho), and expected heterozygosity (He) were calculated in GenAlEx version 6.5 (Table 2; Peakall and Smouse, 2006, 2012). There were one to 10 alleles within western populations, and He ranged from 0.000 to 0.848. Within the eastern populations there were one to four alleles, and He ranged from 0.000 to 0.689. Genotype independence of loci across all pairs of loci within and among populations was tested using the Web-based version of GENEPOP 4.2 (Raymond and Rousset, 1995; Rousset, 2008). After Bonferroni correction (Rice, 1989), significant genotypic linkage disequilibrium was found in three populations: three pairs of loci in Quebec, two pairs of loci in Wyoming, and one pair of loci in Washington. The pairs of loci in linkage disequilibrium were not consistent across populations. When all populations were considered, seven pairwise comparisons had significant linkage disequilibrium and involved two loci (Ptan22 and Ptan23) in two and four of the pairwise comparisons, respectively.

Table 2.

Genetic properties of 13 polymorphic microsatellite loci developed in Pterospora andromedea.a,b

t02_01.gif

Table 3.

Characteristics of nine monomorphic microsatellite loci developed in Pterospora andromedea.

t03_01.gif

CONCLUSIONS

The 13 polymorphic microsatellite loci developed here are the first for P. andromedea. Microsatellite loci for the two primary Rhizopogon hosts, R. kretzerae and R. salebrosus, were recently characterized (Grubisha et al., 2014a). These loci are currently being used in population genetic studies of P. andromedea and Rhizopogon mycobionts to examine genetic diversity and population genetic structure at different hierarchical levels. Furthermore, conservation genetic studies of the endangered eastern populations will provide baseline genetic data for management of populations.

LITERATURE CITED

1.

T. S. Bakshi 1959. Ecology and morphology of Pterospora andromedea. Botanical Gazette (Chicago, III.) 120: 203–217. Google Scholar

2.

M. I. Bidartondo , and T. D. Bruns . 2002. Fine-level mycorrhizal specificity in the Monotropoideae (Ericaceae): Specificity for fungal species groups. Molecular Ecology 11: 557–569. Google Scholar

3.

K. W. Cullings , T. M. Szaro , and T. D. Bruns . 1996. Evolution of extreme specialization within a lineage of ectomycorrhizal epiparasites. Nature 379: 63–66. Google Scholar

4.

N. J. Dowie , J. J. Hemenway , S. M. Trowbridge , and S. L. Miller . 2011. Mycobiont overlap between two mycoheterotrophic genera of Monotropoideae (Pterospora andromedea and Sarcodes sanguinea) found in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Symbiosis 54: 29–36. Google Scholar

5.

A. J. Drummond , B. Ashton , S. Buxton , M. Cheung , A. Cooper , C. Duran , M. Field, et al. 2011. Geneious v5.4 created by Biomatters. Website  http://www.geneious.com [accessed 20 February 2014]. Google Scholar

6.

B. C. Faircloth 2008. MSATCOMMANDER: Detection of microsatellite repeat arrays and automated, locus-specific primer design. Molecular Ecology Resources 8: 92–94. Google Scholar

7.

T. C. Glenn , and N. A. Schable . 2005. Isolating microsatellite DNA loci. Methods in Enzymology 395: 202–222. Google Scholar

8.

L. C. Grubisha , J. D. Brewer , N. J. Dowie , S. L. Miller , S. M. Trowbridge , and M. R. Klooster . 2014a. Microsatellite primers for fungi Rhizopogon kretzerae and R. salebrosus (Rhizopogonaceae) from 454 shotgun pyrosequencing. Applications in Plant Sciences 2(7): 1400029. Google Scholar

9.

L. C. Grubisha , N. J. Dowie , S. L. Miller , C. Hazard , S. M. Trowbridge , T. R. Horton , and M. R. Klooster . 2014b. Rhizopogon kretzerae sp. nov.: The rare fungal symbiont in the tripartite system with Pterospora andromedea and Pinus strobus. Botany 92: 527–534. Google Scholar

10.

C. Hazard , E. A. Lilleskov , and T. R. Horton . 2012. Is rarity of pinedrops (Pterospora andromedea) in eastern North America linked to rarity of its unique fungal symbiont? Mycorrhiza 22: 393–402. Google Scholar

11.

M. R. Klooster , A. W. Hoenle , and T. M. Culley . 2009. Characterization of microsatellite loci in the myco-heterotrophic plant Monotropa hypopitys (Ericaceae) and amplification in related taxa. Molecular Ecology Resources 9: 219–221. Google Scholar

12.

J. R. Leake 1994. Tansley Review, 69. The biology of mycoheterotrophic (‘saprophytic’) plants. New Phytologist 127: 171–216. Google Scholar

13.

R. E. Peakall , and P. E. Smouse . 2006. GenAlEx 6: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 6: 288–295. Google Scholar

14.

R. E. Peakall , and P. E. Smouse . 2012. GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research: An update. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 28: 2537–2539. Google Scholar

15.

M. Raymond , and F. Rousset . 1995. GENEPOP (version 1.2): Population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity 86: 248–249. Google Scholar

16.

W. R. Rice 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43: 223–225. Google Scholar

17.

F. Rousset 2008. GENEPOP'007: A complete reimplementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Molecular Ecology Resources 8: 103–106. Google Scholar

18.

S. Rozen , and H. J. Skaletsky . 2000. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In S. Misener and S. A. Krawetz [eds.]. Methods in molecular biology, vol. 132: Bioinformatics methods and protocols, 365–386. Humana Press, Totowa, New Jersey, USA. Google Scholar

19.

R. Schmieder , and R. Edwards . 2011. Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics 27: 863–864. Google Scholar

20.

A. Schori 2002. Pterospora andromedea Nutt. (Pinedrops). New England Plant Conservation Program, Conservation and Research Plan for New England. New England Wild Flower Society, Framingham, Massachusetts, USA. Website  http://www.newfs.org/docs/pdf/Pterosporaandromedeaweb.pdf [accessed 7 May 2014]. Google Scholar

Notes

[1] Funding for this research has been provided by the National Science Foundation (grant DEB-1050315 to M.R.K. and DEB-1050292 to S.L.M.). The authors thank Ken Cullings for assistance collecting plants in southwestern Wyoming.

Lisa C. Grubisha, Bailey A. Nelson, Nicholas J. Dowie, Steven L. Miller, and Matthew R. Klooster "Characterization of Microsatellite Markers for Pinedrops, Pterospora andromedea (Ericaceae), from Illumina MiSeq sequencing," Applications in Plant Sciences 2(11), (29 October 2014). https://doi.org/10.3732/apps.1400072
Received: 4 August 2014; Accepted: 18 September 2014; Published: 29 October 2014
JOURNAL ARTICLE
PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top