Open Access
8 May 2017 Development and Evaluation of Microsatellite Markers for the Critically Endangered Birch Betula chichibuensis (Betulaceae)
Yuji Igarashi, Hiroki Aihara, Yoshihiro Handa, Hiroshi Katsumata, Masanori Fujii, Koichiro Nakano, Toshihide Hirao
Author Affiliations +

The genus Betula L. (Betulaceae) comprises approximately 60 tree species distributed in boreal and cool-temperate zones of the Northern Hemisphere (Furlow, 1990). Individuals of B. chichibuensis H. Hara (subgenus Aspera) are small trees endemic to Japan (Ashburner and McAllister, 2013). Partly because its habitat is limited to limestone outcrops, this species is narrowly confined to the Chichibu (McAllister, 1993; Igarashi and Yoshida, 2013) and Kitakami (Nagato and Shimai, 2007) mountains in central and northeastern Honshu, respectively. Because only a few small populations have been recorded in these locations, B. chichibuensis is listed as critically endangered on the IUCN Red List (Shaw et al., 2014). The small population sizes and restricted distribution of B. chichibuensis make this species susceptible to diseases and natural disasters, and seriously impede gene flow (Ministry of the Enviromnent, 2015). Analysis of B. chichibuensis genetic structure and maintenance of its genetic diversity are therefore essential for both in situ and ex situ conservation.

In this study, we developed microsatellite markers for B. chichibuensis to investigate the current genetic status of the remaining populations. We also examined the transferability of these developed markers to three other Betula species: B. maximowicziana Regel (subgenus Acuminata), B. platyphylla Sukaczev var. japonica (Miq.) H. Hara (subgenus Betula), and B. schmidtii Regel (subgenus Aspera).


Plant material and DNA extraction —Plant materials of B. chichibuensis were collected from two newly discovered populations growing on limestone outcrops on western Futago Mountain (WF) and along the Oku-Chichibu Forest Road (OC) in the Chichibu Mountains of Japan (Appendix 1). Shoots of 23 and 24 individuals were collected from WF and OC, respectively. Genomic DNA was extracted from freeze-dried leaves and winter buds using a DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). The concentration of genomic DNA was determined with a Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, California, USA) and by gel electrophoresis.

Microsatellite marker development —A total of 400 ng of genomic DNA from an individual OC sample was sheared with NEBNext dsDNA Fragmentase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, Massachusetts, USA). A paired-end library for MiSeq sequencing (Illumina, San Diego, California, USA) was generated using a NEBNext Ultra DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (New England Biolabs). A single 301-bp paired-end sequencing run yielded 20,746,148 reads (DNA Data Bank of Japan [DDBJ] Sequence Read Archive accession no.:DRA005642). Raw reads with quality scores less than 20 and lengths shorter than 20 bp were filtered using Sickle version 1.33 (Joshi and Fass, 2011). De novo assembly using Velvet version 1.2.10 (Zerbino and Birney, 2008) produced 204,911 contigs, where parameters were set as k-mer as 91, auto coverage cut-off, and minimum contig length of 300. The data sets were collated and filtered in QDD version 3.1 (Meglécz et al., 2014) to generate sequences containing microsatellites and to design PCR primers. A total of 125 perfect microsatellite loci consisting of di-, tri-, tetra-, penta-, and hexanucleotide repeat motifs were identified according to the following parameters: GC content of 40–60%, a melting temperature of 57°C to 63°C, and a maximum difference of 2°C between forward and reverse primers.

Microsatellite marker screening —For initial screening, of the 125 loci identified, 56 were selected based on repeat number and fragment size. For these loci, PCR amplification and polymorphism were tested using 10 samples. Individual primer pairs were assayed in 10-µL reaction mixtures containing 4 ng of genomic DNA, 0.05 µM of M13-21-tagged (5′-TGTAAAACGACGGCCAGT-3′) forward primer, 0.2 µM of reverse primer, 0.2 µM of universal primer labeled with 6-FAM fluorescent dye (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA), 0.2 µL of PrimeSTAR GXL DNA polymerase (TaKaRa Bio Inc., Tokyo, Japan), 2 µL of 5× PrimeSTAR GXL Buffer, and 0.2 mM of dNTP mixture. Thermal cycling conditions consisted of 98°C for 5 min; followed by 38 cycles of 98°C for 20 s, touchdown annealing (65°C for four cycles, 63°C for four cycles, 60°C for 20 cycles, and 53°C for 10 cycles) for 20 s, and 68°C for 40 s; and a final step of 68°C for 2 min. Based on the test results, 16 primer pairs were selected (Table 1).

Polymorphism of the 16 markers was examined in 47 samples from the two distinct WF and OC populations (Appendix 1). Following a modified version of the efficient genotyping method described by Blacket et al. (2012), locus-specific forward primers were tagged with 5′ sequences (Table 1), while universal primers were labeled with different fluorescent dyes (6-FAM, VIC, NED, or PET ; Applied Biosystems). Two sets of 8-plex PCR amplifications were performed in 10-µL reaction mixtures containing 10 ng of genomic DNA, 0.05 µM of forward primer, 0.2 µM of reverse primer, 0.2 µM of fluorescently labeled primer, 0.5 µL of Prime-STAR GXL DNA polymerase (TaKaRa Bio Inc.), 2 µL of 5× PrimeSTAR GXL Buffer, and 0.3 mM of dNTP mixture. To obtain high-quality amplification product, a modification of the touchdown PCR procedure of Korbie and Mattick (2008) was carried out using the following cycling conditions: 98°C for 5 min; followed by 50 cycles of 98°C for 30 s, touchdown annealing (63°C to 57°C [decreasing 1°C every two cycles] for 14 cycles, 56°C for 15 cycles, 53°C to 51°C [decreasing 1°C every two cycles] for six cycles, and 50°C for 15 cycles) for 90 s, and 68°C for 40 s; and a final step of 68°C for 15 min. Finally, 1 µL of PCR product was mixed with 0.5 µL of GeneScan 600 LIZ Size Standard (Applied Biosystems) and 8.5 µL Hi-Di formamide (Applied Biosystems) and sequenced on an ABI 3730x1 DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). Genotypes were scored by analyzing fragment sizes using Peak Scanner version 2.0 (Applied Biosystems).

Table 1.

Characteristics of 16 microsatellite markers developed for Betula chichibuensis.a


Microsatellite marker evaluation— Descriptive statistics were computed for the assayed markers using CERVUS version 3.0.7 (Kalinowski et al., 2007). Of the 16 loci tested, 14 were polymorphic, with two to five alleles per locus detected across 47 individuals from the WF and OC populations (Table 2). The mean number of alleles per locus was 2.438, with mean observed and unbiased expected heterozygosities per locus of 0.327 (0.000–0.617) and 0.350 (0.000–0.629), respectively. The mean number of alleles per locus was 2.250 in the WF population and 2.313 in the OC population. For the WF population, mean observed and unbiased expected heterozygosities per locus were 0.285 (0.000–0.652) and 0.295 (0.000–0.641), respectively; for the OC population, the corresponding values were 0.367 (0.000-0.708) and 0.367 (0.000–0.681). GENEPOP version 4.2 (Rousset. 2008) was used to test for deviations from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. No significant deviations (P < 0.05) were observed at any of the loci in either population. Null allele frequency estimates were nearly zero or negative except for Bcc10 and Bcc25 in the WF population and Bcc50 in the OC population. Cross-amplifications were carried out to test marker transferability to closely related species (Appendix 1). Polymorphic variation was detected at six loci in B. maximowicziana and B. platyphylla var. japonica and at seven loci in B. schmidtii (Table 3). These results are consistent with the close phylogenetic relationship of B. chichibuensis and B. schmidtii (Wang et al. 2016).

Table 2.

Genetic variation of 16 microsatellite loci in two natural populations of Betula chichibuensis in central Honshu, Japan.a


Table 3.

Cross-amplification of 16 microsatellite loci in three species closely related to Betula chichibuensis.a



We developed 16 microsatellite markers for the critically endangered birch B. chichibuensis using MiSeq paired-end sequencing. These markers will facilitate understanding of spatial patterns of gene flow and levels of inbreeding, information essential for the conservation of the small isolated populations of this species. Some of the markers were successfully transferred to closely related Betula species.


The authors thank Toyotaro Iwata for helping with fieldwork. This study was supported in part by the 25th Pro Natura Fund (2014) of the Pro Natura Foundation of Japan and a joint project between the University of Tokyo Chichibu Forest and the Suntory Natural Water Sanctuary.



Ashburner, K., and H. A. McAllister. 2013. The genus Betula: A taxonomic revision of birches. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, United Kingdom. Google Scholar


Blacket, M. J., C. Robin, R. T. Good, S. F. Lee, and A. D. Miller. 2012. Universal primers for fluorescent labelling of PCR fragments—An efficient and cost-effective approach to genotyping by fluorescence. Molecular Ecology Resources 12: 456–463. Google Scholar


Furlow, J. J. 1990. The genera of Betulaceae in the southeastern United States. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 71: 1–67. Google Scholar


Igarashi, Y., and Y. Yoshida. 2013. List of vascular plants of the University of Tokyo Chichibu Forest. University of Tokyo Forests 54: 107–155 (in Japanese). Google Scholar


Joshi, N. A., and J. N. Fass. 2011. Sickle: A sliding-window, adaptive, quality-based trimming tool for FastQ files, version 1.33. Website [accessed 30 January 2017]. Google Scholar


Kalinowski, S. T., M. L. Taper, and T. C. Marshall. 2007. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Molecular Ecology 16: 1099–1106. Google Scholar


Korbie, D. J., and J. S. Mattick. 2008. Touchdown PCR for increased specificity and sensitivity in PCR amplification. Nature Protocols 3: 1452–1456. Google Scholar


McAllister, H. A. 1993. Cytology and the conservation of rare birches. In D. R. Hunt [ed.]. Betula: Proceedings of the IDS Betula symposium, 61–66. International Dendrology Society, Morpeth, Northern Ireland. Google Scholar


Meglécz, E., N. Pech, A. Gilles, V. Dubut, P. Hingamp, A. Trilles, R. Grenier, and J.-F. Martin. 2014. QDD version 3.1: A user-friendly computer program for microsatellite selection and primer design revisited: Experimental validation of variables determining genotyping success rate. Molecular Ecology Resources 14: 1302–1313. Google Scholar


Ministry of the Environment. 2015. Red data book 2014: Threatened wildlife of Japan, vol. 8: Vascular plants. Gyosei. Tokyo, Japan (in Japanese). Google Scholar


Nagato, K., and S. Shimai. 2007. On the Betula chichibuensis community developing in the limestone of Kataiwa area in Tono City, Iwate Prefecture, Northeastern Japan. Bulletin of Daito Bunka University 45: 1–16 (in Japanese). Google Scholar


Rousset, F. 2008. GENEPOP'007: A complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Molecular Ecology Resources 8: 103–106. Google Scholar


Shaw. K., S. Roy, and B. Wilson. 2014. Betula chichibuensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2014: e.T194282A2309490. Website [accessed 30 January 2017]. Google Scholar


Wang, N., H. A. McAllister, P. R. Bartlett, and R. J. A. Bucos. 2016. Molecular phytogeny and genome size evolution of the genus Betula (Betulaceae). Annals of Botany 117: 1023–1035. Google Scholar


Zerbino, D. R., and E. Birney. 2008. Velvet: Algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Research 18: 821–829. Google Scholar


Appendix 1.

Voucher information for species used in the development and evaluation of microsatellite markers for Betula chichibuensis.

Yuji Igarashi, Hiroki Aihara, Yoshihiro Handa, Hiroshi Katsumata, Masanori Fujii, Koichiro Nakano, and Toshihide Hirao "Development and Evaluation of Microsatellite Markers for the Critically Endangered Birch Betula chichibuensis (Betulaceae)," Applications in Plant Sciences 5(5), (8 May 2017).
Received: 19 February 2017; Accepted: 1 March 2017; Published: 8 May 2017
Betula chichibuensis
conservation genetics
critically endangered species
MiSeq sequencing
Back to Top