Translator Disclaimer
1 November 2011 After 33 Years, Trees More Frequent and Shrubs More Abundant in Northeast U.S. Alpine Community
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Alpine plant communities are sensitive to global climate change, which has been predicted to cause increases in woody vegetation, possibly at the expense of herbs. We studied a community in western Maine, comparing the frequency and abundance of alpine plants in 2009 with frequency and abundance recorded in 1976. During the 33 years between surveys, the most common tree became more frequent, and as a result, the frequency of trees as a functional group increased. Shrubs did not become more frequent but did become more abundant, driven by the increasing abundance of two Vaccinium species. Several species provided evidence of strong affinities for the north or south slope of the mountain, but in most cases such evidence was apparent in a species' frequency or its abundance, not both, indicating that different forces regulate dispersal and vegetative growth of alpine plants, which could have implications for understanding responses to changing environmental conditions. Total species richness of the community increased, with the addition of several lower montane herbs. The changes are consistent with predictions and with observations made in tundra communities elsewhere.

Introduction

Woody species are predicted to increase in tundra ecosystems as a result of global climate change (Chapin et al., 1996; Epstein et al., 2000), possibly at the expense of herbaceous plants, and some evidence in support of this prediction has been reported. For example, trees have established where they did not previously occur, both in alpine areas (Wardle and Coleman, 1992; Peterson, 1994; Kullman, 2001, 2002), and in arctic tundra (Lescop-Sinclair and Payette, 1995; Danby and Hik, 2007). Increasing shrub abundance also has been reported in alpine (Klanderud and Birks, 2003) and arctic locations (Sturm et al., 2001; Tape et al. 2006; Wilson and Nilsson, 2009). Although many environmental conditions are changing globally (mean annual temperature, annual precipitation, atmospheric CO2 concentration, nutrient levels, length of the growing season, and more), experimental manipulations suggest that warming, in particular, may benefit woody species. For instance, deciduous shrubs increased their height and cover within two years in response to warming in 11 tundra locations (Walker et al., 2006). Deciduous shrubs benefit from warming because they can respond more quickly than evergreen shrubs to the greater availability of nutrients that result from faster nutrient cycling that follows warming.

Species have not responded consistently to warming in all communities, even within functional groups, however. For example, among shrubs, Dryas octopetala and Cassiope tetgragona had positive growth responses to artificial warming at International Tundra Experiment (ITEX) sites, but Ledum palustre and Vaccinium vitis-idaea did not, while V. uliginosum responded positively in one location but not another (Henry and Molau, 1997). Furthermore, the effect of interactions among changing conditions on alpine plant communities has been explored very little. One experiment in an alpine heath community found little community response to warming alone but dramatic changes in response to warming and nutrient addition together (Klanderud, 2008). This and other studies (Van Wijk et al., 2004; Jägerbrand et al., 2009) suggest that the response of communities may vary greatly, depending both on the conditions and on the species present (Shaver et al., 2001; Bret-Harte et al., 2004).

Ultimately, the actual responses of alpine communities to changing conditions can be assessed only by comparing communities at different times, before and after conditions have changed. By comparing species lists compiled by 20th century botanists with the lists of species present on the same mountains now, ecologists have shown that species richness has increased in recent decades (Grabherr et al., 1994, 2001; Klanderud and Birks, 2003; Walther et al., 2005; Erschbamer et al., 2009). But species richness is only one way to look at a community, and communities can change dramatically (even without changing species richness) if the abundance of individual species changes.

Few studies evaluate the degree of change in alpine community composition and structure, primarily because the quantitative data from the past that are needed to make these comparisons are unavailable. In addition to documenting the actual changes that have occurred in real communities, such studies are useful because they provide the means to test predictions based on models or experimental manipulations. In this study, we compare the alpine community on a Maine mountain with the community that existed there 33 years earlier.

Mountains in the Northeast United States have only 34 km2 of alpine habitat (Kimball and Weihrauch, 2000), but the alpine plants of New Hampshire, Maine, New York, and Vermont contribute unique elements to the region's biodiversity. Northeast alpine plants include endemic species, and a number of others reach the southernmost limit of their geographic distributions in these mountains. Alpine communities of the region occur as discrete, mostly small communities, isolated from each other on more than 50 mountains. All occur at relatively low elevations (<2000 m; most <1500 m). The low altitude of the tree line ecotone in the region has been attributed to deep snow and high winds, especially in the winter (Bliss, 1963). Although the alpine communities of these northern Appalachian mountains traditionally have been classified as temperate alpine, they are more similar to boreal and arctic alpine communities, where dwarf shrub-heaths are common (Nagy and Grabherr, 2009). These communities share few species with those in the western mountains of the United States, and their closest counterparts occur hundreds of kilometers to the north in Greenland, Labrador, and Alaska (Bliss, 1963).

The Northeast's alpine communities have a rich history of botanical exploration that contributed to regional floras and produced species lists from a number of mountains. However, few quantitative studies were undertaken to establish the relative abundance of alpine plants, and no previous study reports on species-level changes in alpine plants communities in the region. We report here on change in the alpine plant community on Avery Peak (Bigelow Mountain) in western Maine between 1976, when an initial survey was done, and 2009, when a second survey was done, using the same methods.

We evaluated changes in frequency and abundance of all vascular plant species above tree line and explored whether changes were limited to particular functional groups (trees, shrubs, forbs, graminoids, lycopods). Because previous studies have found evidence that change may be occurring more quickly on southern slopes, we also assessed the influence of aspect on the Avery Peak community. We use our results to evaluate three predictions based on previous alpine plant community research, that (1) woody species will increase in response to increased growing season length and warming growing conditions; (2) arctic species near the southern limit of their range are more vulnerable than those with more widespread distributions and, therefore, are more likely to decline (Lesica and McCune, 2004); and (3) total species richness in the alpine community will increase, as has been observed in other alpine communities.

Methods

Bigelow Mountain is the northernmost peak in the Longfellow Range, an irregular series of 13 summits in western Maine. Bigelow is a 16-km-long ridge that is oriented almost exactly east–west. The largest area of alpine and subalpine habitat is at the east end of the ridge, on Avery Peak (45°9′N, 70°16′W), which has a maximum elevation of 1259 m. The bedrock consists of granulite, meta sandstone, calcium-silicate gneiss, and dark gray slates (Doyle, 1967). The alpine habitat on Bigelow has been classified as “dwarf heath-graminoid alpine ridge” (Wilkerson, 2006). Tree species occur to the summit as stunted specimens in the krummholz. In a survey of Maine mountains with alpine communities, May and Davis (1977) described the vascular plant community of Bigelow as relatively depauperate, which they attributed to its dry, windswept terrain.

The alpine summit of Bigelow has been free from major disturbance events for at least several hundred years. Unlike mountains in many part of the world, domestic animals have never been grazed on mountains in the Northeast. Moose occur naturally on the mountain and, no doubt, browse plants in the alpine zone occasionally. The higher elevations on the mountain have occasional outbreaks of spruce budworm, which could affect fir and spruce; the most recent outbreak was in the 1980s (Wilkerson, 2006). Prior to creation of the 14,570-ha Bigelow Preserve in 1976, land in the region was privately owned, and forests low on the mountain were harvested at least twice early in the 20th century. However, logging activity never reached elevations above 1040 m, and tree line occurs no lower than 1200 m, so this would not have affected the alpine area (Wilkerson, 2006). Forest fires in the region typically are small-scale events triggered by lightning strikes, and there are no records of major burns in the alpine area of Bigelow. A hiking trail runs along the ridgeline over Avery Peak, and there is clear evidence of disturbance by foot traffic. However, this has been limited to a narrow (<1 m wide) strip by construction of scree walls on both sides of the trail along its entire length in the alpine zone.

Alpine communities developed in the Northeast after the retreat of the Wisconsin-age glacial ice sheet. Studies of pollen cores and macrofossils from high-elevation lakes on other mountains in the Northeast indicate that modern alpine plant communities had established by 9000 years before present (BP) (Spear, 1989). Although changing climatic conditions (warming from 9000 to 5000 years BP and cooling temperatures in the past 3000 years) affected lower elevation forests, these changes had little effect on alpine and subalpine communities (Spear, 1989). The community we studied, thus, can be considered a mature (not successional) alpine plant community. While subject to small-scale disturbances, it could reasonably be expected to have a stable age and size structure at the scale of the community.

The initial survey of the alpine community was conducted in August 1976 (Stone, 1980). In conducting the survey, a transect was run along the ridgeline, from the continuous krummholz at the west end of the alpine zone, over the summit and down to the krummholz at the eastern end of the zone. Sampling transects were created at 25 m intervals along the main ridgeline transect, running roughly perpendicular to it, downhill to the north and south to the point at which the krummholz became continuous and at least 1 m high. Within each 10 m section on these transects, a random number generator was used to select one location at which the vegetation was sampled. In vegetation samples, a 50 cm square (0.25 m2) frame was placed over the plants; we recorded all species of vascular plants and estimated the percent cover of each. Percent bare rock and percent bare soil also were recorded. The survey was repeated in August 2009, using the same procedures. We used the same random numbers as in 1976 to select locations at which vegetation was sampled, although the samples were certainly not at exactly the same locations as those sampled in 1976 because of changes in the location of the krummholz, measurement errors, and variation in placement of the ridgeline transect and the transects running from the ridgeline downslope. The 2009 survey was designed to provide a fair comparison with that of 1976, eliminating to the degree possible differences in the results that might occur because of microtopographic variation in the site.

In analyzing the data, percent cover of each species was converted to a modified Domin-Krajina scale (Mueller-Dombois and Ellenberg, 1974) ranging from 1 to 8. Because the primary goal of the 1976 survey was to obtain information on alpine plants, species data were not recorded from samples in which the total cover value for all tree species was 75% or greater; these were recorded simply as krummholz. Although we did record species data for such samples in 2009, they were removed from all species-level analyses, so the 1976 and 2009 vegetation samples are comparable. We calculated frequency and determined the median abundance class of all species occurring in samples. Abundance and frequency represent distinct components of species' distributions, capturing complementary elements of occurrence (Canham and Thomas, 2010). They measure in different ways the “importance” of individual species in a community. Plants can increase over time either by becoming more abundant where they were already established or by colonizing new locations. With the most common species—those occurring in more than 10 samples in each survey—we used Fisher's exact tests to test the null hypothesis that species occurred with the same frequency in 2009 as in 1976. We used the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test to evaluate the significance of changes in species' abundance between the two surveys after correcting for multiple intergroup ties (Sokal and Rohlf, 1995). We also analyzed whether the frequency or abundance of these species differed between the north and south sides of the mountain and whether there was evidence of change in that affinity between surveys. We used the same procedure to analyze change in abundance and frequency of functional groups (trees, shrubs, graminoids, forbs, lycopods). Because of concern that the alpine species most threatened by global climate change may be high arctic species at the periphery of their range (Parsons, 1990; Lesica and McCune, 2004), we compared change in the frequency of widespread species with frequency of the five species having the most restricted geographic distributions—those limited to the Arctic and extending south only as far as mountain summits in the Northeast United States and northern Minnesota and Michigan (Hierochloe alpina, Carex bigelowii, Empetrum eamesii ssp. atropurpurea, Vaccinium uliginosum, and V. vitis-idaea).

Finally, we calculated mean species density in samples and compared values from 1976 and 2009, using t-tests. In both 1976 and 2009, lists of all species present above tree line were compiled, based on species present in samples and those observed elsewhere in the alpine zone, and we used these to assess whether overall species richness in the alpine zone had changed. Voucher specimens of species recorded in 1976 were deposited in the herbarium at the University of Vermont (VT), and vouchers from the 2009 survey were deposited in herbaria at the University of Connecticut (CONN) and the University of Maine (MAINE). Taxonomy follows Haines and Vining (1998).

Results

The 1976 survey included 219 samples, of which 27 (12.3%) were eliminated from analyses because cover of tree species was 75% or greater. Of the remaining 192 samples, 16 (8.3%) had no vascular plants in them. The 2009 survey included 202 samples, of which 41 (20.3%) were removed from analyses because tree cover was 75% or greater, an increase in the frequency of tree-dominated samples (P  =  0.043). Of the 161 remaining samples, 10 (6.2%) had no vascular plants in them, which was not significantly different from 1976.

The identity of the eight most frequent species—those occurring in more than 10 samples both years—did not change during the 33-year period, although the frequency of individual species changed dramatically (Table 1). Abies balsamea (a tree) became more frequent, due largely to increases on the north slope, and the herb Sibbaldiopsis tridentata declined in frequency. The abundance of three species increased significantly between surveys (Table 2), especially that of the shrub Vaccinium uliginosum (Fig. 1).

FIGURE 1

The frequency distributions of cover values of Vaccinium uliginosum are shown for the 1976 and 2009 surveys. The species had 33% cover or greater in 10% of the samples where it occurred in 1976, but this rose to 43% of such samples in 2009.

i1523-0430-43-4-495-f01.tif

TABLE 1

Species recorded in the alpine zone of Avery Peak in western Maine. The number of samples in which each species occurred is shown for surveys done 33 years apart. Also shown is the relative frequency (the percent of all samples—219 in 1976 and 202 in 2009) for each species. Species are arranged in order of frequency in 2009.

i1523-0430-43-4-495-t01.tif

TABLE 2

The median abundance (percent cover) of the eight most frequently occurring species is compared for surveys conducted 33 years apart. The significance of changes in abundance was assessed with the Mann-Whitney U test after correcting for multiple intergroup ties. Species are arranged in order of abundance in 2009.

i1523-0430-43-4-495-t02.tif

As a functional group, trees occurred in 42% of all samples in 1976, and this increased to 56% of samples in 2009 (Fig. 2). Forbs declined in frequency from 39% to 29%, and graminoids declined from 31% to 22%. The frequency of the five species with the most northerly distributions—those occurring in the High Arctic and extending south only as far as mountain summits in the Northeast United States—declined non-significantly (P  =  0.23) from 81% to 75%, while the frequency of widespread species was essentially unchanged.

FIGURE 2

The frequency of trees increased in the 33 years between surveys in a Northeast United States alpine plant community. Declines in forbs and graminoids were marginally significant.

i1523-0430-43-4-495-f02.tif

Frequency and abundance data indicated that several species have clear affinities for one side of the mountain or the other (Table 3), although individual species generally expressed these affinities either in frequency data or abundance data but not both. For two species, aspect had a significant effect for the first time in 2009. Vaccinium uliginosum was more frequent on the north slope (it had not been in 1976), and Vaccinium angustifolium had higher abundance on the south slope than the north slope (aspect did not influence its abundance in 1976). Abundance data showed that three species with higher abundance on the south side of the mountain had a significant increase in abundance on that side, while none of the species with a north-slope affinity increased in this way.

TABLE 3

The affinity of the most frequent species for the north and south slopes of Avery Peak's alpine zone is compared for the two survey periods. The frequency values shown are the percentage of samples in which each species occurred and the significance of the difference (Fisher's exact test) between north and south sides of the mountain, plus the significance of any change in the species' affinities from 1976 to 2009. Abundance values are the median cover classes for each survey period and the results of Mann-Whitney U tests of differences between north and south slopes, plus the significance of change in abundance on each slope from 1976 to 2009. Species are arranged with those appearing disproportionately on the north slope at the top and those with an affinity for the south slope on the bottom.

i1523-0430-43-4-495-t03.tif

The total number of species recorded in samples was 21 in 1976, and three additional species were recorded elsewhere above tree line (Table 1). In 2009, we recorded 19 species in samples, plus an additional eight species elsewhere in the alpine zone. One forb recorded in the first survey (a Prenanthes sp.) was not observed in 2009. The species that recruited to the community since 1976 were two forbs, a grass, and a lycopod (Table 1). The mean number of species in samples did not change in the 33-year period between surveys (3.1 ± 0.16 in 1976 and 3.2 ± 0.18 in 2009, t192,161  =  0.273, P  =  0.785). Mean species density in samples did not differ between north and south slopes either year (3.0 ± 0.19 vs. 3.3 ± 0.32, respectively, in 1976, t101,91  =  −1.48, P  =  0.14; 3.1 ± 0.17 vs. 3.2 ± 0.31, respectively, in 2009, t92,69  =  −0.64, P  =  0.52), and the changes in mean species density from 1976 to 2009 were not significant.

Discussion

The 2009 survey provided evidence of the increasing importance of woody plants—both trees and shrubs—in the alpine community of Avery Peak. During the 33-year interval since the first survey, the most widespread tree species increased dramatically in frequency. Trees as a functional group also increased, and the proportion of tree-dominated sites (those with >75% cover of trees) rose, reaching one in five samples in 2009. The abundance of three other species, notably including two deciduous shrubs, increased. We also recorded an increase in total species richness of the community with the addition of four lower montane species that had not been recorded previously.

Analysis of the influence of aspect showed that several species have clear affinities for the north or south slope. More importantly, our results suggest that the south and north slopes are becoming increasingly different from each other and that aspect is becoming more important in determining community structure. Three species with south-slope affinities increased significantly in abundance while none with north-slope affinities did, and two species had significant affinities with respect to aspect that had not been present in 1976.

The aspect analysis also shows that the forces driving species occurrence patterns are different from those controlling abundance. A clear preference for one side of the mountain or the other was reflected in frequency data or in abundance, but not in both. Sibbaldiopsis tridentata, for example, was found overwhelmingly on the south side of the mountain in both surveys, but its abundance did not vary from one side to the other. On the other hand, the frequency of Vaccinium uliginosum was equally high on the south side of the mountain as on the north, but its abundance in both surveys was significantly higher on the south side. These results suggest that the conditions favorable for the vegetative growth (and vegetative spread) of a species are different from the conditions regulating recruitment such as pollination, maturation of fruit, seed dispersal, and seedling establishment. Changing environmental conditions may affect these forces differently, so additional research would be worthwhile to establish what regulates occurrence and abundance patterns and how they will be affected by warming, nitrogen deposition, and changes in other conditions. On Avery Peak, conditions appear to favor increasing colonization of trees (especially Abies balsamea), which increased in frequency, and the vegetative growth of shrubs, which grew larger or spread vegetatively in locations where they had established previously.

The changes recorded are consistent with those reported in tundra communities around the world (Sturm et al., 2001; Klanderud and Birks, 2003; Tape et al. 2006; Cannone et al., 2007; Wilson and Nilsson, 2009) and are also consistent with predictions that shrubs will increase with global warming at the expense of other functional types (Chapin et al., 1996; Epstein et al., 2000), especially in low-alpine settings, where environmental conditions are least severe and where competition plays the greatest role (Calloway et al., 2002; Erschbamer et al., 2009). However, it is impossible to draw conclusions about the cause of the changes in this plant community without precise information on the environmental conditions to which it has been exposed.

All areas of the Northeast are warming (Keim et al., 2003; Trombulak and Wolfson, 2004), and the effects are apparent in less precipitation falling as snow, snow covering the ground fewer days of the winter, and an earlier beginning of the growing season, especially in northern New England. These changes have occurred largely since 1970 (Hayhoe et al., 2007). The mean annual temperature in Farmington, Maine, the nearest weather station with a long-term record (50 km south of Avery), has risen 2.0 °C in the past 115 years, based on a comparison of the mean temperature for the first 10 years for which data are available (1895–1904) with the most recent 10-year period (through 2009; Menne et al., 2010). The mean annual temperature has risen 1.1 °C just since the 10-year period preceding the 1976 survey. Warming is particularly great during the winter, when the mean temperature is 3.4 °C higher than a century ago. Studies show that warming can lead to increasing dominance of shrubs and trees in tundra communities (Dormann and Woodin, 2002; Walker et al., 2006; Danby and Hik, 2007). Manipulations at 11 tundra sites found that deciduous shrub cover increased with warming (Walker et al., 2006). Vaccinium uliginosum, in particular, is thought to benefit from a longer snow-free period (Klanderud and Birks, 2003), which could result from warming.

Tundra plants also are sensitive to nutrient addition (Chapin et al., 1996; Walker et al., 2001; Britton and Fisher, 2008), and nutrient addition can lead to shifts of community dominance from graminoids to shrubs (Shaver et al., 2001), so we cannot rule out the possibility that atmospheric nitrogen deposition or an interaction between warming and nitrogen deposition has contributed to the changes on Avery Peak. Experimental manipulations in Colorado found that nitrogen addition affected alpine community composition in as little as three years and that the nitrogen levels required to effect some change were no greater than the 6 kg ha−1 yr−1 being deposited at the time of the research (Bowman et al., 2006). Nitrogen deposition in the Northeast reached levels in the 1970s that were 5 to 10 times higher than before industrialization (Galloway et al., 1984), and mean annual wet deposition of nitrogen at the Carrabasset Valley station 9 km south of Avery Peak for the period 2002–2008 was 7.1 kg ha−1 (NADP, 2010).

Other conditions also have changed in tundra ecosystems in the past century, including atmospheric CO2 levels, and these could interact with nitrogen or warming, just as nutrient additions and warming interact with each other (Chapin et al., 1995). It also is likely that, to some degree, species will respond individually, some to warming and some to nutrient additions (Lesica and McCune, 2004; Britton et al., 2009). Only experimental manipulations at a site can establish beyond question what is causing the observed changes in frequency and abundance.

Warming is presumed to be responsible for the establishment in alpine zones of species previously occurring only at lower elevations (Grabherr et al., 1994, 2001; Klanderud and Birks, 2003; Walther et al., 2005; Erschbamer et al., 2009). Increasing richness appears to be most pronounced low in the alpine zone, which would be consistent with our findings. Three of the four species we recorded that had not been observed in the alpine zone previously are common herbs that occur lower on mountains of the region, and we recorded them in most cases low in the alpine zone, under shrubs and stunted trees. The increase in species richness will be temporary if alpine species ultimately disappear because of competition or the loss of suitable habitat (Grabherr et al., 1994; Walther et al., 2002; Klanderud and Totland, 2005). Species losses resulting from competition have not typically been found with rising richness in high alpine areas, possibly because newly arriving species occupy different microhabitats, (Walther et al., 2005), but competition has apparently displaced species in low to mid-elevation alpine communities (Klanderud and Birks, 2003; Britton et al., 2009; Erschbamer et al., 2009; Wilson and Nilsson, 2009).

We found no evidence that species with high-arctic distributions had declined more than other species. In fact, the five high-arctic species on Avery Peak occurred in 75% of the 2009 samples, and only Hierochloe alpina appears threatened because of its low frequency. Three of the other species actually increased in frequency or abundance, including the mostly widely distributed plant in the community, Vaccinium uliginosum. Our results are in marked contrast to those of Lesica and McCune (2004), who found that four of seven arctic/alpine plants at or near the southern limits of their ranges in Montana had declined from 1989 to 2002, while none increased. The difference between our results may be related to how widespread the species are. The Montana species have severely limited geographic distributions and/or are regionally rare, while the Northeast species are globally widespread and sometimes abundant in the region (Bliss, 1963). Narrow geographic ranges and small population sizes are known to make species vulnerable to climatic warming (Sætersdal and Birks, 1997). Our results suggest that having a small niche or geographic range makes species more vulnerable than does having a northern distribution. Two other northern species, Carex bigelowii and Huperzia appalachiana, occur primarily in areas that have not been colonized by trees and shrubs—Carex in two level areas on the top of Avery Peak that are swept free of snow by winter winds, and Huperzia in wet cracks at the base of rock faces. Hierochloe alpina occurred in 11 samples in 1976 but only one in 2009. It and Vahlodia atropurpurea, of which only two plants were found in 2009, appear to be the most vulnerable species on Avery Peak.

Our study found that the structure of the alpine plant community on one mountain in the Northeast has changed since 1976, with woody plants becoming increasingly frequent and abundant. The only other study that considered change among functional groups in the Northeast also found that the frequency of shrubs increased between 1984 and 2007 on four mountains in the Adirondacks of New York (Robinson et al., 2010). The mountains in these studies are like many in the Northeast in that they have alpine communities at relatively low elevation. Many of the herbaceous plants on these mountains occur in open areas where they are exposed to dry winter winds but also full sun during the brief growing season. These species are not usually found in the shade under trees and shrubs and are secure only as long as the mountains have open alpine habitat. If trees and shrubs continue to become more widespread and abundant, species requiring open habitat may become increasingly restricted to disturbed areas and eventually could disappear, following the pattern observed at some altitudes in an arctic alpine site in Sweden (Wilson and Nilsson, 2009). Additional surveys are needed to determine if other mountains in the region are undergoing similar changes that could threaten the persistence of the region's alpine ecosystems.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the Maine Department of Environmental Protection for allowing us to conduct research in Bigelow Preserve, and we thank the Maine Appalachian Trail Club for use of its hut while doing the fieldwork. We very much appreciate the many helpful suggestions made by two anonymous reviewers. Thanks, also, to Karla Capers and Steve Ensdorf for supplying the poles that made it possible to hike not only up the mountain but down as well. Finally, thanks to Thomas F. Heffernon for being our spiritual sherpa.

References Cited

1.

L. C. Bliss 1963. Alpine plant communities of the Presidential Range, New Hampshire. Ecology 44:678–697. Google Scholar

2.

W. D. Bowman, J. R. Gartner, K. Holland, and M. Wiedermann . 2006. Nitrogen critical loads for alpine vegetation and terrestrial ecosystem response: are we there yet? Ecological Applications 16:1183–1193. Google Scholar

3.

M. S. Bret-Harte, E. A. García, V. M. Sacré, J. R. Whorley, J. L. Wagner, S. C. Lippert, and F. S. Chapin III . 2004. Plant and soil responses to neighbour removal and fertilization in Alaskan tussock tundra. Journal of Ecology 92:635–647. Google Scholar

4.

A. J. Britton and J. M. Fisher . 2008. Growth responses of low-alpine dwarf-shrub heath species to nitrogen deposition and management. Environmental Pollution 153:564–573. Google Scholar

5.

A. J. Britton, C. M. Beale, W. Towers, and R. L. Hewison . 2009. Biodiversity gains and losses: evidence for homogenisation of Scottish alpine vegetation. Biological Conservation 142:1728–1739. Google Scholar

6.

R. M. Calloway, R. W. Brooker, P. Choler, Z. Kikvidze, C. J. Lortie, R. Michalet, L. Paolini, F. I. Pugnaire, B. Newingham, E. T. Aschehoug, C. Armas, D. Kikodze, and B. J. Cook . 2002. Positive interactions among alpine plants increase with stress. Nature 417:844–848. Google Scholar

7.

C. D. Canham and R. Q. Thomas . 2010. Frequency, not relative abundance, of temperate tree species varies along climate gradients in eastern North America. Ecology 91:3433–3440. Google Scholar

8.

N. Cannone, S. Sgorbati, and M. Guglielmin . 2007. Unexpected impacts of climate change on alpine vegetation. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5:360–364. Google Scholar

9.

F. S. Chapin III, G. R. Shaver, A. E. Giblin, K. J. Nadelhoffer, and J. A. Laundre . 1995. Responses of arctic tundra to experimental and observed changes in climate. Ecology 76:694–711. Google Scholar

10.

F. S. Chapin III, M. S. Bret-Harte, S. E. Hobbie, and H. Zhong . 1996. Plant functional types as predictors of transient responses of arctic vegetation to global change. Journal of Vegetation Science 7:347–358. Google Scholar

11.

R. K. Danby and D. S. Hik . 2007. Variability, contingency and rapid change in recent subarctic alpine tree line dynamics. Journal of Ecology 95:352–363. Google Scholar

12.

C. F. Dormann and S. J. Woodin . 2002. Climate change in the Arctic: using plant functional types in a meta-analysis of field experiments. Functional Ecology 16:4–17. Google Scholar

13.

R. G. Doyle 1967. Preliminary Geologic Map of Maine. Augusta Maine Geologic Survey. Google Scholar

14.

H. E. Epstein, M. D. Walker, F. S. Chapin III, and A. M. Starfield . 2000. A transient, nutrient-based model of arctic plant community response to climatic warming. Ecological Applications 10:824–841. Google Scholar

15.

B. Erschbamer, T. Kiebacher, M. Martin, and P. Unterluggauer . 2009. Short-term signals of climate change along an altitudinal gradient in the South Alps. Plant Ecology 202:79–89. Google Scholar

16.

J. N. Galloway, G. E. Likens, and M. E. Hawley . 1984. Acid precipitation: natural versus anthropogenic component. Science 226:829–831. Google Scholar

17.

G. Grabherr, M. Gottfried, and H. Pauli . 1994. Climate effects on mountain plants. Nature 369:448. Google Scholar

18.

G. Grabherr, M. Gottfried, and H. Pauli . 2001. Aspects of global change in the Alps and the high arctic region. In C. A. Burga and A. Kratochwil . (eds.). Biomonitoring: General and Applied Aspects on Regional and Global Scales. Dordrecht Kluwer Academic Publishers. 153–177. Google Scholar

19.

A. Haines and T. F. Vining . 1998. Flora of Maine: a Manual for Identification of Native and Naturalized Vascular Plants of Maine. Bar Harbor, Maine V. F. Thomas Co. Google Scholar

20.

K. Hayhoe, C. P. Wake, T. G. Huntington, L. Luo, M. D. Schwartz, J. Sheffield, E. Wood, B. Anderson, J. Bradbury, A. DeGaetano, T. J. Troy, and D. Wolfe . 2007. Past and future change in climate and hydrological indicators in the US Northeast. Climate Dynamics 28:381–407. Google Scholar

21.

G. H. R. Henry and U. Molau . 1997. Tundra plants and climate change: the International Tundra Experiment (ITEX). Global Change Biology 3:1–9. Google Scholar

22.

A. K. Jägerbrand, J. M. Alatalo, D. Chrimes, and U. Molau . 2009. Plant community responses to 5 years of simulated climate change in meadow and heath ecosystems at a subarctic-alpine site. Oecologia 161:601–610. Google Scholar

23.

B. D. Keim, A. Wilson, C. Wake, and T. G. Huntington . 2003. Are there spurious temperature trends in the United States Climate Division Database? Geophysical Research Letters 30:1404. doi:10.1029/2002GL016295. Google Scholar

24.

K. D. Kimball and D. M. Weihrauch . 2000. Alpine vegetation communities and the alpine-treeline ecotone boundary in New England as biomonitors for climate change. In S. F. McCool, D. N. Cole, W. T. Borrie, and J. O'Loughlin . (eds.). Wilderness Science in a Time of Change Conference. Volume 3: Wilderness as a Place for Scientific Inquiry. Ogden, Utah Rocky Mountain Research Station, U.S. Forest Service Proceedings RMRS-P-15. 93–101. Google Scholar

25.

K. Klanderud 2008. Species-specific responses of an alpine plant community under simulated environmental change. Journal of Vegetation Science 19:363–372. Google Scholar

26.

K. Klanderud and J. H. B. Birks . 2003. Recent increases in species richness and shifts in altitudinal distributions of Norwegian mountain plants. The Holocene 13:1–6. Google Scholar

27.

K. Klanderud and Ø Totland . 2005. Simulated climate change altered dominance hierarchies and diversity of an alpine biodiversity hotspot. Ecology 86:2047–2054. Google Scholar

28.

L. Kullman 2001. 20th century climate warming and tree-limit rise in the southern Scandes of Sweden. Ambio 30:72–80. Google Scholar

29.

L. Kullman 2002. Rapid recent range-margin rise of tree and shrub species in the Swedish Scandes. Journal of Ecology 90:68–77. Google Scholar

30.

K. Lescop-Sinclair and S. Payette . 1995. Recent advance of the arctic treeline along the eastern coast of Hudson Bay. Journal of Ecology 83:929–936. Google Scholar

31.

P. Lesica and B. McCune . 2004. Decline of arctic-alpine plants at the southern margin of their range following a decade of climatic warming. Journal of Vegetation Science 15:679–690. Google Scholar

32.

D. E. May and R. B. Davis . 1977. Arctic-Alpine Vegetation on Maine Mountains and Its Relevance to the Critical Aras Program. Augusta, Maine Critical Areas Program. Google Scholar

33.

M. J. Menne, C. N. Williams Jr., and R. S. Vose . 2010. United States Historical Climatology Network (USHCN) Version 2 Serial Monthly Dataset. Oak Ridge, Tennessee Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Last updated June 2010. Accessed online on 12 and 14 October 2010 at  http://neisa.unh.edu/Climate/index.htmlGoogle Scholar

34.

D. Mueller-Dombois and H. Ellenberg . 1974. Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. New York John Wiley and Sons. Google Scholar

35.

NADP [National Atmospheric Deposition Program] 2010. Champaign, Illinois NADP Program Office, State Water Survey. Accessed online on 12 October 2010 at  http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/sites/siteinfo.asp?id=ME04&net=NTNGoogle Scholar

36.

L. Nagy and G. Grabherr . 2009. The Biology of Alpine Habitats. Oxford, Great Britain Oxford University Press. Google Scholar

37.

P. A. Parsons 1990. The metabolic cost of multiple environmental stresses: implications for climatic change and conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 5:313–317. Google Scholar

38.

D. L. Peterson 1994. Recent changes in the growth and establishment of subalpine conifers in western North America. In M. Beniston (ed.). Mountain Environments in Changing Climates. London Routledge. 234–243. Google Scholar

39.

S. C. Robinson, E. H. Ketchledge, B. T. Fitzgerald, D. J. Raynal, and R. W. Kimmerer . 2010. A 23-year assessment of vegetation composition and change in the Adirondack alpine zone, New York State. Rhodora 112:355–377. Google Scholar

40.

M. Sætersdal and H. J. B. Birks . 1997. A comparative ecological study of Norwegian mountain plants in relation to possible future climatic change. Journal of Biogeography 24:127–152. Google Scholar

41.

G. R. Shaver, M. S. Bret-Harte, M. H. Jones, J. Johnstone, L. Gough, J. Laundre, and F. S. Chapin III . 2001. Species composition interacts with fertilizer to control long-term change in tundra productivity. Ecology 82:3163–3181. Google Scholar

42.

R. R. Sokal and F. J. Rohlf . 1995. Biometry, 3rd edition. New York W. H. Freeman and Co. Google Scholar

43.

R. W. Spear 1989. Late-Quaternary history of high-elevation vegetation in the White Mountains of New Hampshire. Ecological Monographs 59:121–151. Google Scholar

44.

A. Stone 1980. Avery Peak on Bigelow Mountain, Maine: the Flora and Vegetation Ecology of a Subalpine Heathland M.S. thesis. Burlington: University of Vermont. pp.  Google Scholar

45.

M. Sturm, C. Racine, and K. Tape . 2001. Increasing shrub abundance in the Arctic. Nature 411:546–547. Google Scholar

46.

K. Tape, M. Sturm, and C. Racine . 2006. The evidence for shrub expansion in northern Alaska and the pan-Arctic. Global Change Biology 12:686–702. Google Scholar

47.

S. C. Trombulak and R. Wolfson . 2004. Twentieth-century climate change in New England and New York, USA. Geophysical Research Letters 31:L19202. doi:10.1029/2004GL020574. Google Scholar

48.

M. T. Van Wijk, K. E. Clemmensen, G. R. Shaver, M. Williams, T. V. Callaghan, F. S. Chapin III, J. H. C. Cornelissen, L. Gough, S. E. Hobbit, S. Jonasson, J. A. Lee, A. Michelsen, M. C. Press, S. J. Richardson, and H. Rueth . 2004. Long-term ecosystem level experiments at Toolik Lake, Alaska, and Abisko, northern Sweden: generalizations and differences in ecosystem and plant type responses to global change. Global Change Biology 10:105–123. Google Scholar

49.

M. D. Walker, W. A. Gould, and F. S. Chapin III . 2001. Scenarios of biodiversity changes in arctic and alpine tundra. In F. S. Chapin, O. E. Sala, and E. Huber-Sannwald . (eds.). Global Biodiversity in a Changing Environment: Scenarios for the 21st Century. New York Springer-Verlag. 83–100. Google Scholar

50.

M. D. Walker, C. H. Wahren, R. D. Hollister, G. H. R. Henry, L. E. Ahlquist, J. M. Alatalo, M. S. Bret-Harte, M. P. Calef, T. V. Callaghan, A. B. Carroll, H. E. Epstein, I. S. Jónsdóttir, J. A. Klein, B. Magnússon, U. Molau, S. F. Oberbauer, S. P. Rewa, C. H. Robinson, G. R. Shaver, K. N. Suding, C. C. Thompson, A. Tolvanen, Ø Totland, P. L. Turner, C. E. Tweedie, P. J. Webber, and P. A. Wookey . 2006. Plant community responses to experimental; warming across the tundra biome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103:1342–1346. Google Scholar

51.

G-R. Walther, E. Post, P. Convey, A. Menzel, C. Parmesan, T. J. C. Beebee, J-M. Fromentin, O. Hoegh-Guldberg, and F. Bairlein . 2002. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416:389–395. Google Scholar

52.

G-R. Walther, S. Beißner, and C. A. Burga . 2005. Trends in the upward shift of alpine plants. Journal of Vegetation Science 16:541–548. Google Scholar

53.

P. Wardle and M. C. Coleman . 1992. Evidence for rising upper limits of four native New Zealand forest trees. New Zealand Journal of Botany 30:303–314. Google Scholar

54.

B. Wilkerson 2006. Natural Resource Inventory of the Bureau of Parks and Lands Flagstaff Region. Augusta, Maine Maine Natural Areas Program. Google Scholar

55.

S. D. Wilson and C. Nilsson . 2009. Arctic alpine vegetation change over 20 years. Global Change Biology 15:1676–1684. Google Scholar
R. S. Capers and A. D. Stone "After 33 Years, Trees More Frequent and Shrubs More Abundant in Northeast U.S. Alpine Community," Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 43(4), 495-502, (1 November 2011). https://doi.org/10.1657/1938-4246-43.4.495
Accepted: 1 July 2011; Published: 1 November 2011
JOURNAL ARTICLE
8 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top