Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 October 2007 Diet Plasticity of Cinereous Vulture Aegypius monachus in Different Colonies in the Extremadura (SW Spain)
Emilio Costillo, Casimiro Corbacho, Ricardo Morán, Auxiliadora Villegas
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The current feeding habits of the Cinereous Vulture Aegypius monachus remain largely unknown since most studies were carried out in the 1970s. To update the information, we studied the diet of the species in different colonies in Extremadura by analyzing the frequency of presence of 378 prey items observed in 283 pellets. In all colonies, sheep carcasses formed the staple food. Nevertheless, there were major differences between colonies in supplementary prey: farm poultry and swine in Sierra de Gata, swine and deer in Sierra de San Pedro and Granadilla. There were also variations between subcolonies within a colony and differences with colonies elsewhere in the Iberian Peninsula. In colonies situated in areas with a high abundance of lagomorphs and deer, such as Cabañeros and Sierra de Andujar, the diet is based on wild animal populations. In other colonies, the diet depends to a large extent on livestock farming: sheep in Sierra de Gata, Granadilla and Sierra de San Pedro, and swine and sheep in Sierra de Guadarrama. The Cinereous Vulture thus shows great trophic plasticity, taking advantage of new resources (such as carcasses of poultry from poultry farms) and responding to variations in prey availability in the area surrounding the colonies. These circumstances need to be taken into consideration for the conservation of the species, in particular when the vultures depend on human resources, which are prone to drastic changes in availability. The recent outbreaks of veterinary diseases (like BSE, foot-and-mouth disease, Rift Valley fever and bluetongue disease) and reforms related to the Common Agricultural Policy, are a point in case.

INTRODUCTION

The Cinereous Vulture Aegypius monachus extends throughout the Palearctic in a wide geographical band from the Iberian Peninsula in the west to Mongolia, Siberia, Korea and China in the east (Del Hoyo et al. 1994). In spite of its wide distribution, it is worldwide classified as ‘near-threatened’ (Collar et al. 1994) and in Europe as ‘vulnerable’ (Tucker & Heath 1994). The population of Extremadura (SW Spain), which is the object of this study, has undergone a major increase (Tucker & Heath 1994, Sánchez 1998, Costillo et al. 2001), totalling 722 pairs in 2004 (Caldera 2004). This represents a large proportion of the population in Spain (1511 pairs in 2004) and in the western Palearctic (1704–1897 pairs) (Arenas & Dobado 2004).

Raptors are at the top of trophic pyramids, with vultures as necrophages playing a fundamental role in ecosystems. Their specialization in consuming carrion has determined unique adaptations in many aspects of their biology (Houston 1979, Donázar 1993). However, the feeding habits of the Cinereous Vulture are poorly known. Cramp & Simmons (1980) provided a qualitative description of diet variation across its range. Apart from dietary studies of single colonies (Guzmán & Jiménez 1998, Moleón et al. 2001, Grefa 2004), not much has been published for the Iberian Peninsula since the 1970s (Bernis 1966, Valverde 1966; Garzón 1973, Hiraldo 1976). The latter found a carrion-dominated diet of small- and medium-sized mammals (mostly Rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus and domestic ungulates) in all studied colonies.

In the last decades, however, there have been major quantitative and qualitative changes in the Mediterranean ecosystems of the Iberian Peninsula which constitute the habitat of the species. These changes involve both livestock farming (fewer equids, more sheep and pigs) (Arroyo et al. 1990, MAPA 2002) and wildlife populations (fewer Rabbits and more of the big game species) (Soriguer et al. 1994, Villafuerte et al. 1995, Carranza 1999). Viral haemorrhagic pneumonia continues to have a severe impact on Rabbit populations (Villafuerte et al. 1995), and there are insistent calls for greater control of livestock carcasses due to diseases such as bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), foot-and-mouth disease and bluetongue disease. The establishment of carcass removal programs could affect the stability and future development of vulture populations (Camiña & Montelío 2006). The reform of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) will also generate major changes in livestock production. These circumstances presumably influenced the availability of Cinereous Vulture's food in the past and may be expected to do so in the near future.

For all these reasons, the study of the diet of the Cinereous Vulture is of special relevance. The objective of the present study is to unravel diet plasticity under present conditions in the Extremadura. To this end we analyse the diet of Cinereous Vultures in different colonies, and study spatial variation of diet within colonies. These data may shed light on the resilience of the species in a rapidly changing landscape.

METHODS

Study sites

Pellets were collected for analysis from five different colonies of Cinereous Vulture in the Autonomous Community of Extremadura (Fig. 1). The data from the areas of Sierra de Gata, Granadilla, and Sierra de San Pedro (Fig. 1), constituting the largest samples and representing different types of Cinereous Vulture colonies in Extremadura regarding habitat, land use and nesting type (Table 1, see also Costillo et al. 2001, Morán-López et al. 2006), were included in the statistical analysis.

The hypothesis was that, given the large size of the colonies, there could be dietary differences indicative of different feeding areas. There were no prior hypotheses concerning spatial partitioning, so the objective spatial delineation of Morán-López et al. (2006) was used and denominated the resulting nest groups as ‘subcolonies’. A cluster analysis was performed to delimit the subcolonies objectively and spatially explicitly, with each nest being assigned to a subcolony. The algorithm used was simple Euclidean distance clustering (‘nearest neighbour clustering’), which defines the distance between two groups as the separation between the two closest objects (StatSoft 1997). The final subcolonies were selected by identifying the similarity level which matched physiographic units — mainly valleys separating hillsides — recognizable with the digital terrain models (altitude and slope) of the GIS. To illustrate with an example of the two largest subcolonies — Granadilla II and San Pedro IV — in the first the nearest distance between nests was 0.15 and the furthest 3.47 km, while in the second the numbers were 0.12 and 3.17 km, respectively. For comparison, the furthest distance between nests of the whole San Pedro colony was greater than 50 km.

Figure 1.

Map of Extremadura (Spain) and Iberian Peninsula showing the location of the studied colonies. Colonies in Extremadura are indicated by circles (closed: colonies included in analyses; open: colonies not included in analyses), and by squares in the rest of the Iberian Peninsula. Cabañeros data (Guzmán & Jiménez 1998); Sierra de Andújar data (Moleón et al. 2001); Sierra de Guadarrama data (Grefa 2004).

f01_201.eps

Table 1.

Characteristics of the studied colonies, including mean altitude of the nesting grounds, principal nesting tree, and principal habitats and land use.

t01_201.gif

Prey collection and pellet analysis

Pellets were gathered below nesting platforms, except for a small percentage that were obtained at perching sites near nests. All pellets were therefore assigned to a specific pair. Samples were collected throughout the annual cycle of the years 1998–2000.

Ingestion of soft parts without fur may prevent detection in pellets (Rosenberg & Cooper 1990), but our species is noted for its preference of the outer parts of carcasses including hides, which would largely eliminate this source of bias (Hiraldo 1976, König 1983). We think that the approach followed in the present work provides a reliable description of the prey spectrum of the Cinereous Vulture, although it does not estimate the real frequency of ingestion of different prey types as in pellet studies in other large raptors (González 1991). From each pellet, hair samples were extracted and studied under a magnifying glass or microscope. Samples were mounted on supports, and compared with a reference collection, and with identification keys for mammal hair (Faliu et al. 1980, Chehébar & Martin 1989, Teerink 1991). The presence of plant remains was not taken into account in the analysis, as the ingestion of plant material is probably to facilitate regurgitation of indigestible elements (Bernis 1966, Hiraldo 1976).

Whenever possible, samples were identified at the species level. Otherwise, samples were classified into higher taxonomic categories, such as swine (Wild Boar Sus scrofa and pigs Sus domesticus, classified as ‘Suidae’) and lagomorphs (Rabbit and Iberian Hare Lepus granatensis classified as ‘Leporidae’) in the order Lagomorpha.

Data analysis and statistical treatment

Presence of a prey species in the pellet was interpreted as showing that the vulture had eaten once from one individual of that species (Hiraldo 1976). This frequency of presence in pellets was calculated for each colony. Dietary diversity was calculated with the Shannon-Weaver index (H′) for six prey categories: Suidae, Cervidae, Caprinae, Leporidae, Other Mammals (see below), and Birds. Similarly, the Berger-Parker index was calculated as a measure of the dominance of any one prey category in the diet (Magurran 1988).

The chi-squared test was applied to analyze inter-colony dietary differences. In order to obtain an adequate distribution of expected frequencies, including the appropriate corrections when the degree-of-freedom of the test was equal to unity (Zar 1996), it was necessary to group categories that had the lowest frequencies of presence. In particular, in comparing the diet between different Extremadura colonies, domestic goats Copra hircus, having a low frequency of presence of 1.32% (n = 378), were grouped with sheep Ovis aries under the subfamily ‘Caprinae’, and carnivores were grouped with unidentified mammals in the category ‘Other Mammals’. These analyses were also performed for each prey category in order to test whether their frequencies of presence were the same in all colonies. Correspondence analysis was used to study intra-colony dietary variations distinguishing subcolonies. This technique enables plotting of each location and each prey group on the same factorial plane (Pielou 1984). A Hutcheson test was used to analyze the inter-colony differences in prey diversity (Magurran 1988).

RESULTS

Diet of Cinereous Vulture in Extremadura

In the different colonies of Extremadura 238 pellets were collected, from which 378 prey items were extracted (Table 2). The prey category most frequently encountered was Caprinae (mainly sheep), followed by Suidae, Cervidae, and Birds. Leporidae were rarely encountered. Ten percent of the mammals could not be identified by means of fur analysis.

Inter-colony variation in diet

The predominant prey category in all three main colonies was Caprinae, followed by poultry in Sierra de Gata (22.1%) and Suidae in the other two colonies (Table 2). The three colonies showed significant differences in composition of the prey spectrum (χ210 = 75.40; P < 0.001). Pairwise comparisons showed the diet in Sierra de Gata to be different from the other two (with Sierra de San Pedro, χ25 = 52.00; P < 0.001; and with Granadilla, χ25 = 32.77; P < 0.001). Instead, the diets of Cinereous Vultures in Granadilla and Sierra de San Pedro were very similar (χ24 = 5.20; P = 0.27).

Comparisons between colonies for each prey category showed statistically significant differences only for Birds and Cervidae (Table 2). Cervidae were rarely present in the diet of the vultures of Sierra de Gata, while they constituted a considerable part of the diet in Granadilla (12.0%) and Sierra de San Pedro (14.4%). Poultry from intensive farms (‘Birds’) was a main prey item in Sierra de Gata, but was detected only once or not at all in the other colonies.

Dietary diversity was similar in all three colonies (Table 2), with no significant differences (Hutcheson test, P > 0.05). Prey dominance followed the inverse order of diversity (Table 2), with Sierra de Gata having the lowest dominance and highest diversity, and Sierra de San Pedro the highest dominance and lowest diversity.

Table 2.

Composition of the diet (percentage of each prey category) of the Cinereous Vulture in colonies in Extremadura (Spain). Diets compared between colonies with largest samples (Sierra de Gata, Granadilla, and Sierra de San Pedro). Nest column gives chi-squared values and statistical significance (ns: not significant; * P < 0.01, ** P < 0.001). Ibores and Cíjara not included in analysis. Extremadura is total of all five colonies.

t02_201.gif

Figure 2.

Plot of Factors I and II of the correspondence analysis for prey categories and vulture subcolonies, grouped by colony.

f02_201.eps

Intra-colony variation in diet

The importance of the different prey items in the diet compared for subcolonies was studied by means of correspondence analysis. For the prey, Factor I was found to account for 59.0% of the variance, and separated the presence of Birds from the rest of the prey (Fig. 2). Factor II accounted for a much smaller percentage of the variance (16.1%), and discriminated Suidae and Leporidae from the rest (Fig. 2). Lastly, Factor III accounted for 15.2% of the variance, and separated Suidae, Cervidae, and Birds.

Table 3.

Diet of Cinereous Vultures in different subcolonies, shown as frequency of presence (%). nt: total number of prey; H′: dietary diversity.

t03_201.gif

For subcolonies, the correspondence analysis yielded similar patterns as to the colonies as a whole. Nevertheless, for each colony separately the relative importance of the different prey species varied between subcolonies (Table 3). The diet was very similar in the different subcolonies, with a clear dominance of Caprinae (sheep). Only some Sierra de Gata subcolonies were separated from the rest due to the presence of Birds in the diet (Fig. 2). Likewise, the subcolonies of San Pedro I and Granadilla I (Fig. 2) differed slightly from the rest regarding the importance of Leporidae and Suidae, respectively. In the remaining subcolonies, the diet was very similar and clustered around positions corresponding to Caprinae and Cervidae.

Dietary diversity was similar in all subcolonies. Those with the highest values were Granadilla I and II (1.30 and 1.27, respectively), as approached by subcolonies San Pedro II and Gata I (Table 3).

DISCUSSION

Diet variation in Extremadura and Iberian Peninsula

The Cinereous Vulture is known to feed on a great variety of prey worldwide and in the Iberian Peninsula in particular (Valverde 1966, Garzón 1973, Hiraldo 1976, Cramp & Simmons 1980, Del Hoyo et al. 1994). In this sense, the diet of the Cinereous Vulture in Extremadura was found to be very different from that of other Iberian colonies (Fig. 3). In Cabañeros (Guzmán & Jimenez 1998) and in the Sierra de Andujar (Moleón et al. 2001), the diet is composed of lagomorphs and deer. On the contrary, in the Sierra de Guadarrama, the presence of lagomorphs is low, and a great part of the diet consists of domestic pigs (23%) and sheep and goats (25%) (Grefa 2004). In line with general trends in raptors, the diet of Cinereous Vulture in different parts of the Iberian Peninsula changes in response to prey availability (Costillo 2005). In the different colonies of Extremadura sheep carcasses formed the staple food. Nevertheless, there were major differences between colonies in supplementary prey as Suidae, Cervidae and Birds, with the result that the diet found in Sierra de Gata was different from that of Sierra de San Pedro and Granadilla (Fig. 2).

The Cinereous Vulture is able to make use of carcasses of small animals such as Rabbit, which used to be its main prey when Rabbit populations still thrived (Garzón 1973, Hiraldo 1976). The Rabbit is currently an important prey in Cabañeros and in the Sierra de Andújar (Guzmán & Jiménez 1998, Moleón et al. 2001), where densities are still high (Guzmán & Jiménez 1998, Angulo 2003). In areas with abundant lagomorphs, Cinereous Vultures predation centred on Rabbit carcasses (Garzón 1973, Hiraldo 1976, Costillo 2005), a situation that complies with theories in avian ecology that predict that abundant resources lead to specialization (MacArthur & Levins 1967). Epidemics such as myxomatosis result in seasonal variations in the availability of carcasses for Cinereous Vultures (Soriguer 1981, Guzmán & Jiménez 1998), and hence in similar variations of Rabbits in the diet (Hiraldo 1976, Guzmán & Jiménez 1998, Moleón et al. 2001). In such colonies, ungulates — being a relatively stable resource throughout the year — become an important albeit secondary prey: during the past century sheep and goats supplemented the lagomorph-based diet (Hiraldo 1976); today it is deer (Guzmán & Jiménez 1998, Moleon et al. 2001).

Figure 3.

Frequency of presence (in pellets) of main prey categories in several colonies of Cinereous Vulture in the Iberian Peninsula. Sources: S. de Gata, Granadilla and S. de San Pedro (n = 283 pellets, this study); Cabañeros (n = 129; Guzmán & Jiménez 1998); Sierra de Andujar (n = 199; Moleón et al. 2001); Guadarrama (n = 60; Grefa 2004).

f03_201.eps

Myxomatosis and viral haemorrhagic pneumonia have caused Rabbit populations to crash over extensive areas in the Iberian Peninsula (Sumption & Flowerdew 1985, Villafuerte et al. 1995). Rabbit densities are presently low in those parts of Extremadura where Cinereous Vultures breed (Junta de Extremadura 1992). For this reason, Cinereous Vultures in Extremadura mainly fed on carcasses of domestic ungulates, in particular Sheep. Sheep has been known as food of Cinereous Vultures in the Iberian Peninsula (Garzón 1966, Hiraldo 1976) and other areas of its distribution (Cramp & Simmons 1980), although never before to the extent found in Extremadura. This situation may have arisen from the fact that sheep density in Extremadura is much higher (on average 10 808/100 km2) than in the rest of Spain (4037/100 km2) (MARA 2002). Additionally, the European Community subsidizes sheep farming by head of livestock, hence fostering the ageing of stock (as calculated by Alvarez 2002) with consequent higher natural mortality.

In the colonies of Granadilla and Sierra de San Pedro (Fig. 4), the vultures supplemented their diet with swine and deer. The importance of Red Deer Cervus elaphus as food of Cinereous Vultures has also been established elsewhere in the Iberian Peninsula, such as Cabañeros and Sierra de Andujar (Guzmán & Jiménez 1998, Moleón et al. 2001) (Fig. 3). Red Deer have undergone a major population boost in the Iberian Peninsula (Braza et al. 1989, Soriguer et al. 1994). Many estates have been fenced to allow intensive management of deer populations, and this has led to a considerable increase (Carranza 1999). High densities and fencing caused a decline in health and genetic quality of deer, resulting in higher mortality rates (Ballou & Ralls 1982, León 1991, Carranza 1999). Combined with increased hunting these estates offer now many more deer remains for Cinereous Vulture than in the recent past.

Cinereous Vultures in the Sierra de Guadarrama take advantage of intensive pig farming; carcasses are dumped in what are known as ‘muladares’ (dumps for dead livestock) (Grefa 2004). The greatest number of livestock near this vulture colony is found in the Province of Segovia, with pigs predominating; in 2000 out of 1.8 million head of livestock, pigs totalled 950 000 (data: Junta de Castilla y León, Regional Authorities of Castilla y León). In the Extremadura, domestic pigs and Wild Boar are abundant but their relative importance in the vulture's diet is difficult to assess because of problems of differentiating them in pellets. The pig-farming sector in Extremadura is represented by 1.3 million animals, mostly in a free-range regime in the proximities of vulture colonies (MARA 2002). The situation of Wild Boar is similar to that described above for Red Deer (Saez-Royuela & Telleria 1986, León 1991).

Figure 4.

Typical habitat of Cinereous Vulture in Sierra de San Pedro with the nesting area (at the right) and feeding area (at the left) (photo E. Costillo).

f04_201.eps

In the colony of Sierra de Gata, Cinereous Vultures showed a different feeding strategy by complementing their diet with Birds, in particular chickens Gallus domesticus from intensive poultry farms. Presence of birds, both wild and domestic species, in the diet of the Cinereous Vulture has been noted before (Valverde 1966, Hiraldo 1976). Also in Guadarrama, it is recorded frequently, accounting for 10% of prey presence (Grefa 2004). However, the high proportion of Birds as found in the diet of the vultures from the Gata colony has never been reported before. Indeed, birds constituted the principal prey in two subcolonies (Table 3). García et al. (1998) noted the importance of poultry from intensive farms in the diet of Red Kite Milvus milvus overwintering in the Iberian Peninsula. The Cinereous Vulture's current use of remains from intensive poultry farms is probably a response to the high availability of this resource. This livestock sector has undergone explosive growth in recent years in Spain in general, and in Extremadura in particular (MAPA 2002).

Intra-colony variation in diet

In addition to variability between colonies, we also found variability in diet between subcolonies in a given colony. This may reflect individual feeding differences of pairs constituting a colony, as described by Hiraldo (1976). Vultures may use different home ranges, and hence exploit different carrion types, as show by radio-tracking (Costillo 2005). It is also possible that individuals specialize, as observed in other bird species (Götmark 1984).

Food habits and conservation biology

In agreement with other authors (Anderson & Erlinge 1977, Recher 1990) our data suggest that the Cinereous Vulture in the Iberian Peninsula can be regarded as a generalist. Likewise, its use of new food sources, its adaptive responses to drastic changes in prey availability, and the breadth of its prey spectrum, indicate that the Cinereous Vulture presents great trophic plasticity (sensu Morse 1980). Its use of new resources is not only illustrated by the exploitation of remains and carrion from intensive poultry farms, but also by the feeding on dead fish in a reservoir of Extremadura (own observations). For the Doñana marshes, Valverde (1966) furthermore cites Eel Anguilla Anguilla and waterbird carrion as prey.

In this aspect the Cinereous Vulture contrasts with the Griffon Vulture Gyps fulvus, which is highly specialized in consumption of mediumsized or large ungulates (Donázar 1993). Pennycuick (1976) describes a similar situation in Africa with Lappet-faced Vulture Torgos tracheliotus, an ecological counterpart of the Cinereous Vulture, and other species of the genus Gyps which are specialized on large African herbivores (Houston 1974). Similarly, the California Condor Gymnogyps californianus, another large carrion-feeder, exhibits a highly varied diet (Snyder & Snyder 2000) with a similar range of prey as found in Cinereous Vulture. This wider range of carrion is probably related to a wide range of foraging strategies (Donázar 1993), which makes them efficient in finding carrion of smaller size.

The feeding habits of the Cinereous Vulture could play an important role in the conservation of its populations. Regarding diet two types of colonies occur in the Iberian Peninsula: one is linked to wild prey (lagomorphs and deer) and another to livestock (sheep and pigs). In areas where Rabbits are scarce, the diet of the Cinereous Vulture is closely linked to human resources such as livestock farming. This implies that the species is sensitive not only to environmental change, but especially to human activities as extensive livestock farming that affect these resources (De Juana & De Juana 1984, Arroyo et al. 1990). The social and health alarms caused by livestock diseases (BSE, Rift Valley fever, and bluetongue disease) have led to legislation and other measures aimed at a stricter control of livestock carcasses (Camiña & Montelío 2006). Also, the forthcoming reform of the CAP will affect the livestock sector as a whole, and may well result in a reduction in the present and future availability of food for carrionfeeders. Given the trophic plasticity of the Cinereous Vulture, and the fact that the impact of these new circumstances (CAP reforms and stricter control of livestock carcasses) will presumably vary from colony to colony, studies of the availability of other prey, both domestic and wild, would be required to foresee how this new situation would affect the Cinereous Vulture.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The data were collected under the financial sponsorship of the Project LIFE-Nature 97/250 “Gestión de ZEPA en Extremadura. Recuperatión y conservatión del Buitre Negro y del Águila Perdicera”, subproject “Biología y Plan de Manejo del Buitre Negro en Extremadura” of the General Directorate for the Environment, Board of Agriculture and the Environment, Junta of Extremadura. Our special acknowledgements go to Juan Manuel Sánchez Guzmán who directed the project and made valuable suggestions that helped us to improve this study. We thank very much Manuel Flores Cid de Rivera and Francisco Acedo Balsera for assistance throughout the research. We also thank Rob G. Bijlsma, Lexo Gavashelishvili and Stefan Schindler for their critical and constructive comments that improved the manuscript. We would particularly like to express our gratitude to the professionals of the Environmental Ranger Service who made it possible to attain a better knowledge of the distribution of the nesting populations of Cinereous Vultures, and to the private land owners who allowed us access to their estates. The work complies with the current laws of Spain.

REFERENCES

1.

J.M. Alvarez 2002. Productión de ovino: buscar la rentabilidad. De sol a sol 23: 39–42. Google Scholar

2.

M. Andersson & S. Erlinge 1977. Influence of predation on rodent populations. Oikos 29: 591–597. Google Scholar

3.

E. Angulo 2003. Factures que afectan a la distributión y abundancia del conejo en Andalucía. Doctoral Thesis, Universidad Complutense, Madrid. Google Scholar

4.

R.M. Arenas & P.M. Dobado 2004. Conclusion. International Symposium on the Black Vulture Aegypius monachus. Cordoba, Spain. Google Scholar

5.

B. Arroyo , E. Ferreiro & V. Garza 1990. II Censo nacional de Buitre Leonado (Gyps fulvus). Población, distributión, demografía y conservatión. Colección técnica ICONA, Madrid. Google Scholar

6.

J. Ballou & K. Ralls 1982. Inbreeding and juvenile mortality in small populations of ungulates: a detailed analysis. Biol. Conserv. 24: 239–272. Google Scholar

7.

F. Bernis 1966. El Buitre Negro (Aegypius monachus) en Iberia. Ardeola 12: 46–99. Google Scholar

8.

E. Braza , I. Varela , C. San José & V. Cases 1989. Distributión del corzo, el gamo y el ciervo en España. Quercus 42: 4–11. Google Scholar

9.

J. Caldera 2004. El Buitre Negro en Extremadura. I Simposium Internacional sobre el Buitre Negro. Córdoba, Spain. Google Scholar

10.

A. Camiña & E. Montelío 2006. Griffon Vulture Gyps fulvus food shortages in the Ebro Valley (NE Spain) caused by regulations against Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE). Acta Omithol. 41: 1–8. Google Scholar

11.

J. Carranza 1999. Aplicaciones de la Etología al manejo de las poblaciones de ciervo en el suroeste de la Peninsula Ibérica: productión y conservatión. Etología 7: 5–18. Google Scholar

12.

C. Chehébar & S. Martín 1989. Guía para el reconocimiento microscópico de los pelos de los mamíferos de la Patagonia. Doñana, Acta Vert. 16: 247–291. Google Scholar

13.

N.J. Collar , M.S. Crosby & A.J. Stattersfield 1994. Birds to watch 2: The world list of Threatened Birds. Bird Life Conservation Series 4. BirdLife International, Cambridge. Google Scholar

14.

E. Costillo , R. Morán , G. Lagoa , P. Corbacho & A. Villegas 2001. Núcleos reproductores y evolutión de las poblaciones de Buitre Negro (Aegypius monachus) en Extremadura. Congreso International “Gestión de ZEPAs en Extremadura: Águila Perdicera y Buitre Negro”. Cáceres. Google Scholar

15.

E. Costillo 2005. Biología y Conservatión de las poblaciones de Buitre Negro (Aegypius monachus) en Extremadura. Doctoral Thesis, Universidad de Extremadura, Spain. Google Scholar

16.

S. Cramp & K.E.L. Simmons (eds) 1980. Handbook of the birds of the western Palearctic.Vol. 2. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Google Scholar

17.

E. De Juana & F. De Juana 1984. Cabaña ganadera y distributión y abundancia de los Buitres común (Gyps fulvus) y negro (Aegypius monachus) en España. Rapinyaires mediterranis (II): 32–45. Google Scholar

18.

J. Del Hoyo , A. Elliot & J. Sargatal 1994. Handbook of the Birds of the World. Vol. 2. New World Vultures to Guineafowl. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. Google Scholar

19.

J.A. Donázar 1993. Los buitres ibéricos: Biología y conservation. J.M. Reyero Editor, Madrid. Google Scholar

20.

L. Faliu , Y. Lignereux & J. Barbat 1980. Identification des poils des mammiferes pyreneens. Doñana, Acta Vertebrata 1: 125–212. Google Scholar

21.

J.T. Garcia , J. Viñuela & C. Sunyer 1998. Geographic variation of the winter diet of the Red Kite Milvus milvus in the Iberian Peninsula. Ibis 140: 302–309. Google Scholar

22.

J. Garzón 1973. Contributión al estudio del status, alimentatión y protection de las Falconiformes en España central. Ardeola 19: 280–330. Google Scholar

23.

L.M. González 1991. Historia natural del Águila imperial ibérica (Aquila adalberti Brehm, 1861). Colección Técnica ICONA Madrid. Google Scholar

24.

F. Götmark 1984. Food and foraging in five European Larus gulls in the breeding season: a comparative review. Ornis Fenn. 61: 9–18. Google Scholar

25.

Grefa 2004. El Buitre Negro. International Symposium on the Black Vulture Aegypius monachus. Córdoba, Spain. Google Scholar

26.

J. Guzmán & J. Jiménez 1998. Alimentatión del Buitre Negro Aegypius monachus durante los periodos reproducer y postreproductor en el Parque National de Cabañeros. In: R.D. Chancelor , B.-U. Meyburg & J.J. Ferrera (eds) Holartic Birds of Prey: 215–221. ADENEX-WWGBP, Badajoz. Google Scholar

27.

F. Hiraldo 1976. Diet of the Black Vulture (Aegypius monachus) in the Iberian Peninsula. Doñana, Acta Vert. 3: 19–31 Google Scholar

28.

D.C. Houston 1974. Food searching in griffon vultures. E. Afr. Wildl. J. 12: 63–77 Google Scholar

29.

D.C. Houston 1979. The adaptations of scavengers. In: A.E.R. Sinclair & M. Norton-Griffiths (eds) Serengeti: Dynamics of an Ecosystem: 263–286. Chicago University Press, USA. Google Scholar

30.

de Extremadura. Junta 1992. Plan de Ordenación Cinegética de Extremadura. Unpubl. report. Directión General de Medio Ambiente, Junta de Extremadura. Google Scholar

31.

C. König 1983. Interspecific and intraspecific competition for food among Old Vultures. In: S.R. Wilbur & J.A. Jackson (eds) Vulture biology and management: 153–171. University of California Press, Cambridge. Google Scholar

32.

L. León 1991. Principales enfermedades contagiosas en especies cinegéticas. In: IFEBA. Manual de ordenación y gestión cinegética 1: 105–134. IFEBA, Badajoz. Google Scholar

33.

R.H. MacArthur & R. Levins 1967. The limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species. Am. Nat 101: 377–385. Google Scholar

34.

A.E. Magurran 1988. La Diversidad Ecológica y su medición. Ed. Vedrá Barcelona. Google Scholar

35.

MAPA (Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentatión) 2002. Hechos y cifras del sector agroalimenario y del medio rural español. Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentatión, Secretaría Técnica, Madrid. Google Scholar

36.

M. Moleón , M.A. Diáz , J.M. Barea & J.M. Gil 2001. Diet of Eurasian Black Vulture (Aegypius monachus) in Andujar Natural Park, SE Spain. 4th Eurasian Congress on Raptors. Sevilla. Google Scholar

37.

R. Morán-López , J.M. Sánchez-Guzmán , E.C. Borrego & A.V. Sánchez 2006. Nest-site selection of endangered cinereous vulture (Aegypius monachus) populations affected by anthropogenic disturbance: present and future conservation implications. Anim. Conserv. 9: 29–37. Google Scholar

38.

D.H. Morse 1980. Behavioral mechanisms in ecology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. Google Scholar

39.

I. Newton 1979. Population ecology of raptors. Poyser, Berkhamsted. Google Scholar

40.

C.J. Pennycuick 1976. Breeding of the lappet-faced and white-headed vultures (Torgos tracheliotus Foster and Trigonoceps occipitalis Burchell) on the Serengeti Plains, Tanzania. E. Afr. Wildl. J. 14: 67–84. Google Scholar

41.

E.C. Pielou 1984. The interpretation of ecological data. Classification and ordination. Whiley & Sons, New York. Google Scholar

42.

H.F. Recher 1990. Specialist or generalist: Avian response to spatial and temporal changes in resources. Stud. Avian Biol. 13: 333–336. Google Scholar

43.

K.V. Rosenberg & R.J. Cooper 1990. Approaches to avian diet analysis. Stud. Avian Biol. 13: 80–90. Google Scholar

44.

C. Sáez-Royuela & J.L. Teilerías 1986. The increased population of the wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) in Europe. Mamm. Rev. 16: 97–101. Google Scholar

45.

J.J. Sánchez 1998. The recovery of the Black Vulture (Aegypius monachus) in Spain. In : E Tewes , J.J. Sánchez , J.J. Heredia & M. Bijleveld van Lexmond (eds) International Symposium on The Black Vulture in South Eastern Europe and Adjacent Regions (Dadia, Greece, 1993): 89–99. Black Vulture Conservation Foundation, Palma de Mallorca. Google Scholar

46.

R.C. Soriguer 1981. Biología y dinámica de una población de conejos (Oryctolagus cuniculus L.) en Andalucía Occidental. Doñana Acta Vert. 8: 1–379. Google Scholar

47.

R.C. Soriguer , P. Fandos , E. Bemáldez & J.R. Delibes 1994. El ciervo en Andalucía. Junta de Andalucía, Jerez de la Frontera. Google Scholar

48.

K.J. Sumption & J.R. Flowerdew 1985. The ecological effects of the decline in rabbit (O. cuniculus L.) due to myxomatosis. Mammal Review 15: 151–186. Google Scholar

49.

N. Snyder & H. Snyder 2000. The California Condor: A saga of Natural History and Conservation. Academic Press, San Diego. Google Scholar

50.

StatSoft, Inc . 1997. Statistica for Windows. StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa. Google Scholar

51.

B.J. Teerink 1991. Hair of West-European Mammals. Atlas and Identification Key. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Google Scholar

52.

G.M. Tucker & M.F. Heath (eds) 1994. Birds in Europe: their conservation status. Birdlife International, Cambridge. Google Scholar

53.

J.A. Valverde 1966. Sobre buitres negros en Andalucia. Ardeola 12: 101–115. Google Scholar

54.

R. Villafuerte , C. Calvete , J.C. Blanco & J. Lucientes 1995. Incidence of viral haemorrhagic disease in wild rabbit populations in Spain. Mammalia 59: 651–659. Google Scholar

55.

J.H. Zar 1996. Biostatistics. Prentice Hall, New Jersey. Google Scholar

Appendices

SAMENVATTING

Er is weinig bekend over de huidige voedselkeuze van Monniksgieren Aegypius monachus, want het meeste werk op dit gebied is tientallen jaren oud. Het onderhavige onderzoek richtte zich op het menu van deze gieren in een aantal kolonies in Extremadura in het zuidwesten van Spanje. Kolonie is hierbij een rekbaar begrip, want de maximale afstand tussen nesten binnen een kolonie bedroeg 50 km. Binnen kolonies lagen de nesten meestal in clusters (‘subkolonies’) bijeen, op een afstand van 100 m tot ruim 3 km van elkaar. Er werden 283 braakballen bij de nesten verzameld, waarin 378 prooien werden geïdentifieeerd. Schapen vormden in alle kolonies de hoofdmoot van het voedsel. In Sierra de Gata werd dit aangevuld met kippen en varkens uit de intensieve veehouderij — gedumpt op zogenoemde ‘muladares’ — en in Sierra de San Pedro en Granadilla brachten herten, varkens en wilde zwijnen variatie in het menu. Uit literatuuronderzoek bleek ook het gierenbestand elders in Spanje sterk afhankelijk van landbouwdieren met overwegend schapen en varkens op het menu (Sierra de Guadarrama). In gebieden met een rijk aanbod aan konijnen en herten (bijvoorbeeld Cabañeros en Sierra de Andujar) vormden wilde dieren (na hun dood) een belangrijke bron van voedsel. De grote variatie in voedselkeuze die de gieren over heel Spanje lieten zien, bleek ook op kleinere schaal uit verschillen tussen subkolonies. Het grote aandeel van landbouwhuisdieren in het menu van de Monniksgier laat zien hoe goed de soort zich in het moderne landschap weet aan te passen. Aan de andere kant maakt het de soort kwetsbaar, omdat de beschikbaarheid van dergelijke prooien sterk kan fluetueren. In de nabije toekomst kan daarbij gedacht worden aan de consequenties van recente uitbraken van BSE, mond- en klauwzeer en blauwtong en aan veranderingen in de Europese landbouwpolitiek. (RGB)

Emilio Costillo, Casimiro Corbacho, Ricardo Morán, and Auxiliadora Villegas "Diet Plasticity of Cinereous Vulture Aegypius monachus in Different Colonies in the Extremadura (SW Spain)," Ardea 95(2), 201-211, (1 October 2007). https://doi.org/10.5253/078.095.0204
Received: 22 January 2007; Accepted: 1 September 2007; Published: 1 October 2007
KEYWORDS
Aegypius monachus, diet
intracolony variation
trophic plasticity
Back to Top