Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2009 Responses of Owls and Eurasian Kestrels to Spatio-Temporal Variation of Their Main Prey
Erkki Korpimäki, Harri Hakkarainen, Toni Laaksonen, Ville Vasko
Author Affiliations +

Many owl species and also Eurasian Kestrels Falco tinnunculus (hereafter Kestrels) feed mainly on voles of the genera Microtus and Clethrionomys in North Europe. Three-to-four-year population cycles of voles are characteristic in boreal and arctic areas of North Europe. These multi-annual population cycles of voles are different from those in temperate areas of Europe, because the amplitude of the cycles is much higher (50–200-fold), the spatial synchrony extends over 80–600 km, and there are steep summer declines of voles in the north (Korpimäki et al. 2004, 2005b). In addition, population densities of herbivorous voles and mice, and even of insectivorous shrews fluctuate in close synchrony (Korpimäki et al. 2005a).

The three-year population cycle of voles has been prevailing in western Finland during >30 years. In the low phase of the cycle, vole densities are low during the breeding season of owls and Kestrels but slowly start to recover in late summer. In the increase phase of the cycle, vole densities are intermediate during the egg-laying period of owls and Kestrels but fastly increase in the course of the summer. In the decline phase of the cycle, vole densities are still intermediate in early spring but decline to low numbers at the end of nestling and fledging periods of owls and Kestrels (Fig. 1 in Korpimäki & Hakkarainen 1991). These cyclic fluctuations induce highly varying food situations with predictable ‘fat’ and ‘lean’ periods for owls and Kestrels.

Owls and Kestrels mainly numerically responded to these fluctuating food conditions. Breeding percentage of Tengmalm's Owls Aegolius funereus in 500 nest boxes varied from 1% to 33% during 1973–2007 (Fig. 1 in Laaksonen et al. 2002). Breeding density of Kestrels varied from 0.9 to 11.7 nests/10 km2 and that of Short-eared Owls Asio flammeus from 0 to 11.5 nests/10 km2 during 1977–2007 (Table 2 in Korpimäki & Norrdahl 1991). Breeding densities of owls and Kestrels were positively correlated with the density indices of voles in the prevailing spring (Korpimäki 1994). Yearly mean clutch size of Tengmalm's Owls varied from 3.5 to 6.5 eggs and that of Kestrels from 4.3 to 6.0 eggs during 1977–2007 (Korpimäki & Hakkarainen 1991, Korpimäki & Wiehn 1998). Yearly mean clutch sizes of owls and Kestrels were closely correlated with vole density indices in current spring (Korpimäki & Hakkarainen 1991, Korpimäki & Wiehn 1998). The degree of hatching asynchrony of owl and Kestrels broods varied in the course of the vole cycles: it was less in low vole years than in increase and decrease vole years (Wiebe et al. 1998, Valkama et al. 2002).

Breeding dispersal of female Tengmalm's Owls was more extensive in the decrease than in the increase and low phases of the vole cycle, but this was not found for owl males (Korpimäki 1993), which mostly occupied the same territories after their first breeding attempts (Korpimäki 1988). Analyses of long-term dispersal and survival data from Kestrels showed largely similar results: more females returned to breed close to (<5 km) previous year breeding site in the increase than in the other phases of the vole cycle but no cycle-phase-related differences were found in males (Korpimäki et al. 2006, Vasko 2007). Annual adult survival of male Tengmalms's owls varied from approx. 25% to approx. 75% and was closely positively related to vole density indices in winter (Fig. 1 in Hakkarainen et al. 2002). Juvenile survival of Tengmalm's Owls was apparently higher in the increase phase than in the other phases of the vole cycle, because the proportion of fledglings that in subsequent years recruited to the breeding population was twice as high in the increase as in the other phases of the vole cycle (Korpimäki & Lagerström 1988). Similar results were also obtained for recruitment of Kestrel fledglings.

Male owls that initiated their breeding lifespan in the increase phase of the vole cycle had higher lifetime reproductive success (LRS) than those initiating their career in the decline phase (Korpimäki 1992). LRS of male owls was reduced in territories with higher proportion of farmland, mainly because their fledgling production was reduced in these territories in years when vole populations were declining (Hakkarainen et al. 2003, Laaksonen et al. 2004). LRS of male owls increased with the proportion of old-growth forest in the territory, which appeared to be due to survival of males increasing with old forest in the territory (Laaksonen et al. 2004, Hakkarainen et al. 2008). Higher survival in old forests is likely to be due to better protection against larger birds of prey (e.g. Ural Owls Strix uralensis and Goshawks Accipiter gentilis), and/or to better availability of alternative prey (e.g. Bank Voles Clethrionomys glareolus, shrews, Willow Tits Parus montanus and Crested Tits P. cristatus, etc.), particularly in winter. In particular, Ural Owls have harmful effects on Tengmalm's Owls and thus decrease the habitat quality of smaller Tengmalm's Owls (Hakkarainen & Korpimäki 1996).

Temporal variation in vole abundance is the main determinant of breeding success, quality of offspring, survival of adult males, breeding dispersal distances, recruitment of offspring and LRS of Tengmalm's Owls. Since reduction in the area of old forests decreased the survival and LRS of Tengmalm's Owls, we predicted long-term declines of Tengmalm's owl populations in northern European boreal forests. This was also found in nation-wide monitoring study of birds of prey in Finland (Honkala & Saurola 2006). On the contrary, large-scale clear-cutting of North European boreal forests increases the grassy habitat for voles (Hakkarainen et al. 1996), which could benefit hunting Kestrels. A long-term increase in population size of Kestrels found in nation-wide monitoring study of birds of prey in Finland (Honkala & Saurola 2006) may thus be partly explained by changes in habitat structure. These results show that recent human-induced large-scale habitat manipulation can substantially alter the breeding population sizes and have profound effects on the composition of assemblages of birds of prey.

1.

H. Hakkarainen & E. Korpimäki 1996. Competitive and predatory interactions among raptors: an observational and experimental study. Ecology 77: 1134–1142. Google Scholar

2.

H. Hakkarainen , V. Koivunen , E. Korpimäki & S. Kurki 1996. Clear-cut areas and breeding success of Tengmalm's owls Aegolius funereus. Wildl. Biol. 3: 253–258. Google Scholar

3.

H. Hakkarainen , E. Korpimäki , V. Koivunen & R. Ydenberg 2002. Survival of male Tengmalm's owls under temporally varying food conditions. Oecologia 131: 83–88. Google Scholar

4.

H. Hakkarainen , S. Mykrä , S. Kurki , E. Korpimäki , A. Nikula & V. Koivunen 2003. Habitat composition as a determinant of reproductive success of Tengmalm's owls under fluctuating food conditions. Oikos 100: 162–171. Google Scholar

5.

H. Hakkarainen , E. Korpimäki , T. Laaksonen , A. Nikula & P. Suorsa 2008. Survival of male Tengmalm's owls increases with cover of old forest in their territory. Oecologia 155: 479–486. Google Scholar

6.

J. Honkala & P. Saurola 2006. Breeding and population trends of common raptors and owls in Finland in 2005. Yearbook of Linnut magazine 2005: 9–22. Google Scholar

7.

E. Korpimäki 1988. Effects of territory quality on occupancy, breeding performance and breeding dispersal in Teng-malm's owl. J. Anim. Ecol. 57: 97–108. Google Scholar

8.

E. Korpimäki 1992. Fluctuating food abundance determines the lifetime reproductive success of male Tengmalm's owls. J. Anim. Ecol. 61: 103–111. Google Scholar

9.

E. Korpimäki 1993. Does nest-hole quality, poor breeding success or food depletion drive the breeding dispersal of Tengmalm's owls. J. Anim. Ecol. 62: 606–613. Google Scholar

10.

E. Korpimäki 1994. Rapid or delayed tracking of multi-annual vole cycles by avian predators? J. Anim. Ecol. 63: 619–628. Google Scholar

11.

E. Korpimäki & H. Hakkarainen 1991. Fluctuating food supply affects the clutch size of Tengmalm's Owl independent of laying date. Oecologia 85: 543–552. Google Scholar

12.

E. Korpimäki & M. Lagerström 1988. Survival and natal dispersal of fledglings of Tengmalm's owl in relation to fluctuating food conditions and hatching date. J. Anim. Ecol. 57: 433–441. Google Scholar

13.

E. Korpimäki & K. Norrdahl 1991. Numerical and functional responses of Kestrels, Short-eared Owls, and Long-eared Owls to vole densities. Ecology 72: 814–826. Google Scholar

14.

E. Korpimäki & J. Wiehn 1998. Clutch size of kestrels: seasonal decline and experimental evidence for food limitation under fluctuating food conditions. Oikos 83: 259–272. Google Scholar

15.

E. Korpimäki , P.R. Brown , J. Jacob & R.P. Pech 2004. The puzzles of population cycles and outbreaks of small mammals solved? BioScience 54: 1071–1079. Google Scholar

16.

E. Korpimäki , K. Norrdahl , O. Huitu & T. Klemola 2005a. Predator-induced synchrony in population oscillations of coexisting small mammal species. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 272: 193–202. Google Scholar

17.

E. Korpimäki , L. Oksanen , T. Oksanen , T. Klemola , K. Norrdahl & P.B. Banks 2005b. Vole cycles and predation in temperate and boreal zones of Europe. J. Anim. Ecol. 74: 1150–1159. Google Scholar

18.

E. Korpimäki , R. L. Thomson , V. Vasko & T. Laaksonen 2006. Breeding dispersal of Eurasian Kestrels in a temporally varying environment. J. Ornithol. 147: 45–46. Google Scholar

19.

T. Laaksonen , E. Korpimäki & H. Hakkarainen 2002. Interactive effects of parental age and environmental variation on the breeding performance of Tengmalm's owls. J. Anim. Ecol. 71: 23–31. Google Scholar

20.

T. Laaksonen , H. Hakkarainen & E. Korpimäki 2004. Lifetime reproduction of a forest-dwelling owl increases with age and area of forests. Proc. R. Soc. B 271: S461–S464. Google Scholar

21.

J. Valkama , E. Korpimäki , A. Holm & H. Hakkarainen 2002. Hatching asynchrony and brood reduction in Tengmalm's owl Aegolius funereus: the role of temporal and spatial variation in food abundance. Oecologia 133: 334–341. Google Scholar

22.

V. Vasko 2007. Breeding dispersal of Eurasian kestrels in a temporally and spatially fluctuating environment. M.Sci. thesis, Department of Biology, University of Turku, Finland. Google Scholar

23.

K.L. Wiebe , E. Korpimäki & J. Wiehn 1998. Hatching asynchrony in Eurasian kestrels in relation to the abundance and predictability of cyclic prey. J. Anim. Ecol. 67: 908–917. Google Scholar
Erkki Korpimäki, Harri Hakkarainen, Toni Laaksonen, and Ville Vasko "Responses of Owls and Eurasian Kestrels to Spatio-Temporal Variation of Their Main Prey," Ardea 97(4), 646-647, (1 December 2009). https://doi.org/10.5253/078.097.0435
Published: 1 December 2009
JOURNAL ARTICLE
2 PAGES


Share
SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top