Morphological and molecular evidence refute a broad circumscription for Pultenaea glabra (Fabaceae: Mirbelieae), with implications for taxonomy, biogeography, and conservation

Matthew A. M. Renner; Russell L. Barrett; Steve Clarke; James A. R. Clugston; Trevor C. Wilson; Peter H. Weston

doi:10.1071/SB21030_CO

How to translate text using browser tools

23 September 2022 Morphological and molecular evidence refute a broad circumscription for Pultenaea glabra (Fabaceae: Mirbelieae), with implications for taxonomy, biogeography, and conservation

Matthew A. M. Renner, Russell L. Barrett, Steve Clarke, James A. R. Clugston, Trevor C. Wilson, Peter H. Weston

Author Affiliations +

Australian Systematic Botany, 35(4):340 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1071/SB21030_CO

Morphological and molecular evidence refute a broad circumscription for Pultenaea glabra (Fabaceae: Mirbelieae), with implications for taxonomy, biogeography, and conservation

Citation Download Citation

Matthew A. M. Renner, Russell L. Barrett, Steve Clarke, James A. R. Clugston, Trevor C. Wilson, and Peter H. Weston "Morphological and molecular evidence refute a broad circumscription for Pultenaea glabra (Fabaceae: Mirbelieae), with implications for taxonomy, biogeography, and conservation," Australian Systematic Botany 35(4), 340, (23 September 2022). https://doi.org/10.1071/SB21030_CO

Published: 23 September 2022

Access the abstract

JOURNAL ARTICLE
1 PAGES

DOWNLOAD PAPER + SAVE TO MY LIBRARY