Translator Disclaimer
1 April 2002 Nature of DNA Damage in Ejaculated Human Spermatozoa and the Possible Involvement of Apoptosis
Author Affiliations +

Numerous studies have shown the presence of DNA strand breaks in human ejaculated spermatozoa. The nature of this nuclear anomaly and its relationship to patient etiology is however poorly understood. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between nuclear DNA damage, assessed using the TUNEL assay and a number of key apoptotic markers, including Fas, Bcl-x, and p53, in ejaculated human spermatozoa from men with normal and abnormal semen parameters. We also determined the nature of the DNA damage by examining the percentage of ejaculated spermatozoa exhibiting DNA damage using the comet assay and by challenging sperm chromatin to attack by micrococcal nuclease S7 and DNase I. We show that TUNEL positivity and apoptotic markers do not always exist in unison; however, semen samples that had a low sperm concentration and poor morphology were more likely to show high levels of TUNEL positivity and Fas and p53 expression. In addition, the DNA damage in ejaculated human sperm is represented by both single- and double-stranded DNA breaks, and access to the DNA is restricted by the compacted nature of ejaculated spermatozoa. This DNA protection is poorer in men with abnormal semen parameters. We propose that the presence of DNA damage is not directly linked to an apoptotic process occurring in spermatozoa and arises due to problems in the nuclear remodeling process. Subsequently, the presence of apoptotic proteins in ejaculated spermatozoa may be linked to defects in cytoplasmic remodeling during the later stages of spermatogenesis.

Denny Sakkas, Odette Moffatt, Gian Carlo Manicardi, Ewa Mariethoz, Nicoletta Tarozzi, and Davide Bizzaro "Nature of DNA Damage in Ejaculated Human Spermatozoa and the Possible Involvement of Apoptosis," Biology of Reproduction 66(4), 1061-1067, (1 April 2002).
Received: 10 July 2001; Accepted: 1 November 2001; Published: 1 April 2002

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.

Get copyright permission
Back to Top