Translator Disclaimer
1 April 2003 Structural Features of Sterols Required to Inhibit Human Sperm Capacitation
Matthew R. Nimmo, Nicholas L. Cross
Author Affiliations +

Ejaculated mammalian sperm must undergo a final maturation (capacitation) before they can acrosome-react and fertilize eggs. Loss of cholesterol is an essential step in the capacitation of human sperm. Experimentally maintaining a high level of cholesterol inhibits capacitation, but the mechanism is unknown. The present study investigated the structural features that are required for cholesterol's inhibitory activity. Human sperm also contain much desmosterol, which is lost from sperm during capacitation. Preventing the loss of desmosterol inhibited capacitation (as assessed by acrosomal responsiveness), with an effectiveness approximately equal to cholesterol's inhibitory activity. Other structural analogs were added to the incubation medium to replace sperm cholesterol and desmosterol. Most inhibited capacitation, including those that lacked cholesterol's 3β-OH group (cholesteryl methyl ether and epicholesterol) and those with modified C17 groups (ergosterol and diosgenin). Two steroids did not inhibit capacitation well. Coprostanol, which has a nonplanar steroid nucleus, had low inhibitory activity that could be explained by an elevated endogenous cholesterol concentration. Epicoprostanol, which has a nonplanar ring structure and a 3α-OH group, promoted rather than inhibited capacitation. The inhibitory activity of the analogs was correlated with their ability to promote order of egg phosphatidylcholine as measured by fluorescence anisotropy. In summary, a planar ring structure is required for sterol inhibitory activity, but a 3β-OH group and a saturated cholesterol-like aliphatic tail on C17 are not required. The present results support the hypothesis that sperm sterols block capacitation by increasing order of phospholipids.

Matthew R. Nimmo and Nicholas L. Cross "Structural Features of Sterols Required to Inhibit Human Sperm Capacitation," Biology of Reproduction 68(4), 1308-1317, (1 April 2003).
Received: 18 June 2002; Accepted: 1 October 2002; Published: 1 April 2003

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.

Get copyright permission
Back to Top