Translator Disclaimer
19 April 2017 Row and forage crop rotation effects on maize mineral nutrition and yield
W.E. Riedell, S.L. Osborne
Author Affiliations +

Diverse crop rotations are an integral component of sustainable agriculture. The objectives were to investigate row and forage crop rotation effects on stover biomass, grain yield, and mineral nutrient concentrations of maize (Zea mays L.) grown under a maize–soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] 2-yr rotation (C–S); maize–soybean–spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) 3-yr rotation (C–S–W); maize–soybean–oat/pea (Avena sativa L./Pisum sativum L.) hay 3-yr rotation (C–S–H); and maize–soybean–oat/pea hay underseeded with alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) – alfalfa – alfalfa 5-yr rotation (C–S–H/A–A–A). Rotations were established in 1997 and maize plots were sampled in 2008–2011. Across the 4 yr of the study, grain yield was 10% greater (1.0 Mg ha-1) in C–S–H/A–A–A and C–S–W rotations compared with C–S with C–S–H intermediate. Under C–S–H/A–A–A, kernel N concentration was 7% greater, kernel P was 17% less, and kernel K was 7% less compared with C–S–W. Kernel Zn concentration was 16% lower in C–S–H than in C–S and C–S–H/A–A–A. Thus, diversification of the C–S rotation with wheat (C–S–W) increased yield while conserving kernel P and K concentration, whereas diversification with oat/pea hay alfalfa (C–S–H/A–A–A) increased grain yield and kernel N concentration but decreased both kernel P and kernel K concentration.

This work is free of all copyright and may be freely built upon, enhanced, and reused for any lawful purpose without restriction under copyright or database law. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication (CC0 1.0).
W.E. Riedell and S.L. Osborne "Row and forage crop rotation effects on maize mineral nutrition and yield," Canadian Journal of Plant Science 97(4), 645-653, (19 April 2017).
Received: 6 January 2017; Accepted: 1 April 2017; Published: 19 April 2017

Get copyright permission
Back to Top