Translator Disclaimer
19 May 2020 Characterizing mass–volume–density–porosity relationships in a sandy loam soil amended with compost
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Although compost is widely used as an organic soil amendment or conditioner, little is known of how it affects the characteristics or interactions among soil constituents. To address this, mixture theory was used to describe the mass–volume–density–porosity attributes and interactions among bulk soil, the mineral constituent, and the organic matter constituent of a sandy loam soil in a no-till corn field that had received one-time additions of yard waste compost at rates of 0 (control), 64, 154, and 380 dry t ha-1. Bulk density (BD, 0–10 cm depth) decreased consistently and near-linearly with increasing soil organic matter (SOM) mass fraction (FOM) for all six growing seasons (2012–2017) after compost addition. Fitting mixture theory expressions to BD vs. FOM data and to soil particle density vs. FOM data for 2013–2017 yielded constant mineral and SOM self-packing densities of DM = 1.673 Mg m-3 and DO = 0.335 Mg m-3, respectively, and constant mineral and SOM particle densities of ρM = 2.760 Mg m-3 and ρO = 1.409 Mg m-3, respectively. On a self-packing basis, soil mineral and SOM domain porosities were constants at nM = 0.39 and nO = 0.76, respectively. On a bulk soil volume basis, soil mineral and SOM porosities and volume ratios were linear functions of FOM. The porosity and volume characteristics of the SOM domain differed substantially from those of bulk soil and the mineral domain, and may therefore control the agri-environmental performance of soil, given that organic matter influences soil functioning more than mineral matter.

© Her Majesty the Queen in right of Canada 2020. Permission for reuse (free in most cases) can be obtained from copyright.com.
W.D. Reynolds, R.E. Nurse, L.A. Phillips, C.F. Drury, X.M. Yang, and E.R. Page "Characterizing mass–volume–density–porosity relationships in a sandy loam soil amended with compost," Canadian Journal of Soil Science 100(3), 289-301, (19 May 2020). https://doi.org/10.1139/cjss-2019-0149
Received: 25 November 2019; Accepted: 5 April 2020; Published: 19 May 2020
JOURNAL ARTICLE
13 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top