Translator Disclaimer
1 August 2004 Attack and Reproductive Success of Mountain Pine Beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in Fire-Damaged Lodgepole Pines
Ché M. Elkin, Mary L. Reid
Author Affiliations +

High-intensity fires are known to kill adult and larval bark beetles, but it is unclear how mountain pine beetles (Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins) respond to trees that have been damaged by lower-intensity ground fires at the periphery of burns. We conducted an experiment to determine whether mountain pine beetles preferentially attack trees that have been damaged by fire and to determine how fire damage affects beetles’ reproductive success. We simulated different intensities of ground fires by artificially burning a strip of bark that extended zero-thirds, one-third, two-thirds, or three-thirds around a tree’s circumference. Burn treatments were applied ∼7 wk before beetles emerged from surrounding trees. We found that beetles did not preferentially attack fire-damaged trees; fire damage had no effect on the number of beetles landing on a tree, which trees were attacked, attack rate, attack density, or the body size of beetles attacking a tree. Beetle reproductive success (number and condition of offspring) was also not affected by fire damage. Beetles were more likely to overcome tree defenses and produce successful egg galleries on fire-damaged trees than on undamaged trees, but this was only observed on trees with low beetle attack densities. If beetle attack density was high, trees were successfully attacked irrespective of burn treatment. Our results suggest that fire damage only affects mountain pine beetle reproduction and population growth in areas where attack densities are low. In other situations, fire damage will have negligible effects on beetle attack and reproductive success.

Ché M. Elkin and Mary L. Reid "Attack and Reproductive Success of Mountain Pine Beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in Fire-Damaged Lodgepole Pines," Environmental Entomology 33(4), 1070-1080, (1 August 2004).
Received: 8 October 2003; Accepted: 1 January 2004; Published: 1 August 2004

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.

Get copyright permission
Back to Top