Translator Disclaimer
10 June 2021 Protected but not from Contamination: Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Bacteria from Birds in a Ghanaian Forest Protected Area
Sawyerr Louisa Modupe, Ntiamoa-Baidu Yaa, Owusu Erasmus Henaku, Kenji Ohya, Suzuki Masato, Odoi Justice Opare, Kayang Boniface Baboreka
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Resistance to antimicrobial agents is a growing concern in public health. It has been reported in wildlife from several places in the world though wild animals are not normally exposed to clinically used antimicrobial agents. Despite this, very little research has been done in Ghana to determine antimicrobial resistance in wild animals, particularly those in protected areas. In this study, the presence of colistin resistant and multidrug resistant (MDR) gram-negative bacteria in cloacal swabs of wild birds captured in a Ghanaian forest protected area were evaluated. A total of 195 isolates from 138 individual birds were obtained, identified and tested for resistance to colistin. The colistin-resistant isolates were subsequently tested for multidrug resistance to 4 other antimicrobial agents (Oxytetracycline, Streptomycin, Ampicillin and Ciprofloxacin). Colistin resistance was observed in 6.5% (9/138) of the birds and this was seen in only birds that were sampled close to the reception area of the protected area. About 50% of the colistin-resistant isolates were multidrug resistant. AMR isolates were obtained from birds that have been documented to show an insectivorous or omnivorous feeding preference. Data obtained from the study suggests that AMR and MDR occurred in wild birds from the Conservation Area and supports the claim that proximity to human impacted habitats (settlements/farmlands) increased the likelihood of carriage of AMR. Though the routes of transmission remain unclear, there is potential for spread from the wild birds to other wild/domestic animals and possibly back to humans.

Introduction

Protected areas (PAs) are legally acquired areas dedicated and managed for the long term conservation of nature.1 They are the main focal areas for the conservation and management of biodiversity.2 Also, they serve as refugia to wild animals in areas where they are exploited for meat, particularly in Central and West Africa.3 As a result, PAs are considered to be sites where wild animals experience minimal human disturbance. This claim is supported by findings from studies that have shown that bacteria isolated from wildlife in remote areas show little or no evidence of antibiotic resistance.47 On the other hand, wild animals sampled from areas with relatively high anthropogenic influence have shown high resistance to antimicrobial agents.810 It may be inferred from the above that the wild animals in protected areas also have minimal or no antibiotic resistance.

Antimicrobial resistance is a serious concern with major implications for human and animal health.11 Once wild animals acquire resistant bacteria, they may become bioindicators or reservoirs of resistant bacteria.12 They can also reintroduce resistant bacteria to humans and domestic animals via contamination of shared soil and water sources.13 The prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in wild animals appears to be dependent on a variety of factors including foraging strategies and the type of habitat where the animal was sampled. However, contact with a human-influenced habitat remains a major factor leading to the acquisition of resistant bacteria.14

The relatively high frequency of possible contact that wild birds have with humans and other animals due to the nature of their mobility makes them ideal animals for investigating the exchange of microbes or pathogens in the human-wildlife interface.

Very little information is available on the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in wild animals inhabiting protected areas. Though threats of transmission to/from wild animals have been observed in studies from several countries,5,9,1517 there is little information on the occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in wild animals from Ghana. For example, a study inferred antibiotic resistant bacteria transfer to wild birds that use landfill sites by examining soil collected from the land fill sites.18 Against the backdrop that there is little information available on antibiotic-resistant bacteria in wild birds from Ghana, this study examined the cloacal microbiota of wild birds from the Ankasa Conservation Area for presence of gram-negative bacteria, and determined their antimicrobial resistance profiles. Specifically, we determined antimicrobial sensitivity to colistin, one of the last resort antimicrobial agents used in the treatment of multidrug resistant infections caused by gram-negative bacteria. Subsequently, colistin-resistant isolates were evaluated for multidrug resistance.

Materials and Methods

Study site description

Birds were trapped from the Ankasa Conservation Area (ACA), a protected area comprising the Nini Suhien National Park and the Ankasa Resource Reserve. It is located in the Western Region of Ghana (Figure 1). The Conservation Area is a wet evergreen forest and covers an area of approximately 50,900 ha of land.19 It is relatively pristine as the Nini Suhien part of the area remains untouched. The area is biodiverse and home to several species of plants and animals including 800 vascular plants, 600 butterfly species, 43 mammal species and 10 primate species.20 Two roads and a powerline run through a larger portion of the Conservation Area. The old Nkwanta village and Nkwanta camp serve as corridors where non-forest bird species could be found. Settlements around the reception area belonged to inhabitants of the Nkwanta village (formally located within the Conservation Area) and workers of the Forestry Commission, Ghana. The inhabitants of the Nkwanta village were engaged mainly in farming; their farms were located at the periphery of the reception area. They produced cash crops (coconut, cocoa and palm plantations), edible crops (banana and pineapple) and food crops (plantain, cassava, vegetables, yam).21

Figure 1.

A map of Ghana showing the Ankasa Conservation Area were the study was carried out. (A) administrative map of Ghana; (B) Ankasa Conservation Area showing survey sites.

10.1177_11786302211017687-fig1.tif

Trapping of birds

Permission to collect samples in the study area was obtained from the Wildlife Division of the Ghana Forestry Commission. Ethical considerations regarding the study were approved by the Ethics Committee of the college of Basic and Applied Science, University of Ghana (ECBAS 003/17-18). Birds were captured using nylon mist-nets between December 2017 and May 2018 in two locations within the protected area: around the Nkwanta camp and about 300 to 800 m away from the reception area (Figure 1). Captured birds were removed from the nets and each placed in a cotton bird bag. The bags were sent to a processing area immediately for sample collection. The processing area was about 5 minutes away by foot from where the birds were captured. Each bird was identified, assessed for health by physical examination for any signs of disease. Sex (for sexually dimorphic species) and age (adult or juvenile) of each bird were recorded. The birds were not anesthetized or sedated during sampling as this was a very harmless procedure. All captured birds were ringed using the Ghana ringing scheme22 to help identify recaptures. In order not to alter the way the birds interact with their natural environment, they were not housed and were released unharmed to the locations they were captured within 30 minutes from time of capture.

Sample collection

Sterile swabs were used in collecting cloacal swabs from trapped birds. Non-duplicate cloacal swab sample was collected from each bird. The swabs were inoculated into 200 µl phosphate buffered saline (PBS); the samples were kept at −20°C for the 2 days spent on each trip and transported on ice to the Biotechnology laboratory, University of Ghana for further processing.

Isolation of bacteria

Each swab was streaked on MacConkey agar, and the agar plates were incubated at 35°C for 18 to 20 hours aerobically. The agar plates were inspected for colonies and distinct morphotypes were picked per sample and purified individually. The pure colonies of bacteria were inoculated onto soft nutrient agar in microtubes and stored at room temperature for further examinations. Isolates were identified by morphological characteristics, gram staining, motility test and biochemical tests (indole, catalase, oxidase, urease, Triple Sugar Iron (TSI), Methyl-Red-Voges-Proskauer and citrate).23

DNA extraction and sequencing of bacteria isolates

The genera of 24 resistant isolates were confirmed by sequencing of the 16S rRNA. First, whole DNA was extracted from the isolates using the boiling method.24 To identify the isolates, PCR amplification (size of amplicon was 919 bp), purification and sequencing of the 16S rRNA were performed.25,26 Each nucleotide was assembled with SNAPGENE (GSL Biotech, available at  snapgene.com) and BioEdit (Version 7.2.5, available at bioedit.software.informer.com/7.2/) softwares. A partial sequence was used to compare 16S rRNA gene sequences in the nucleotide Basic Local Alignment Sequence Tools (BLAST) geneBank database ( https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) for similarities. Sequences with similarity percentage ⩾99% were considered closely related species in terms of genus.

Antimicrobial susceptibility test

Antimicrobial susceptibility for 195 isolates was determined by supplementing molten MacConkey agar with colistin sulfate (Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Corporation, Japan) (2 µg/ml).27 The solidified medium was streaked with a bacteria isolate and incubated for 24 hours at 37°C. Agar plate supplemented with colistin that showed bacteria growth were presumed to be resistant to colistin. The presumptive colistin-resistant isolates were subsequently subjected to multidrug resistance test using the disc diffusion method.

The Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method was used for the detection of multidrug resistant isolates following guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.28 A total of 4 commercially prepared antimicrobial disc (6 mm) were used for the disc diffusion test: ampicillin (AMP 10 µg), oxytetracycline (OTC 30 µg), streptomycin (SM 10 µg) and ciprofloxacin (CIP 5 µg) (Nippon Becton Dickinson Co. Ltd., Fukushima Prefecture, Japan). Three of the antimicrobial agents were selected because of their frequency as active agents in the composition of antibiotics given to farm animals in Ghana2932 and ciprofloxacin was selected because of its common use in the treatment of urinary tract infection33,34 and cholera in Ghana.31 The reference strain, E. coli ATCC 25 922, was used as control and the interpretation of the diameters of the zones of inhibition was determined using the CLSI recommendations (resistant, intermediate or susceptible).35 A 150 mm Mueller-Hinton medium plate was swabbed with TSB, inoculated with each bacterial isolate and incubated to a turbidity of 0.5 McFarland standard.36 The 4 antibiotic discs were placed on the inoculated plates and incubated for 35°C for 18 to 20 hours. The zones of inhibition around the antimicrobial disc including the 6 mm antimicrobial agent diameter were measured with Vernier calipers.

Data analysis

Bird species were categorized on the basis of where they were trapped in the forest (ie, 800 m from the reception area and 8 km away from the reception area).21 To avoid the potential bias of using uneven numbers of isolates per sample, statistical comparisons were conducted at the faecal sample level where a sample was recorded as resistant when at least 1 of the isolates obtained from the faecal sample was resistant to an antimicrobial agent, and multidrug resistant when at least 1 of its isolates was resistant to 3 or more classes of antimicrobials. The data were analyzed using the Fishers exact test and Binomial test in R version 3.4.2.37 Confidence intervals of resistance rates were also calculated. P-value < .05 statistical significance was set.

Results

Birds captured and isolation of gram-negative bacteria

Overall, 138 cloacal swabs were obtained from the forest birds (one swab from each bird). The birds belonged to 9 families and 20 species ( Supplementary file). A total of 195 gram-negative bacteria isolates belonging to 10 genera were isolated, namely: Shigella spp., Yersinia spp., Salmonella spp., Citrobacter spp., Enterobacter spp., Klebsiella spp., Proteus spp., Pseudomonas spp., Serratia spp. and Escherichia spp. The numbers of isolates belonging to each bacteria genus and their prevalence are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Proportions of gram-negative enterobacteriaceae genera isolated from the forest birds.

10.1177_11786302211017687-table1.tif

Resistance to colistin

Overall 6.5% (n = 9, 95% CI 3.0-12.0%) of the birds (9/138) harboured colistin-resistant bacteria. Resistant isolates belonged to the genera Citrobacter, Enterobacter, Escherichia and Klebsiella (Table 2). A comparison of the prevalence of the 4 different bacteria genera (Citrobacter, Enterobacter, Escherichia, Klebsiella) in the microbiota of the birds showed no significant difference (P = .406).

Table 2.

Prevalence of colistin-resistant gram-negative enterobacteriaceae in each bird species.

10.1177_11786302211017687-table2.tif

Colistin-resistant bacteria isolates were obtained from 6 bird species: Forest Robin, Icterine Greenbul, Olive Sunbird, Red-tailed Bristlebill, White-tailed Ant Thrush, Yellow-whiskered Greenbul (Table 2). In 2 of the bird species (Yellow-whiskered greenbul and Forest robin), a maximum of 3 colistin-resistant bacteria genera (Enterobacter, Escherichia and Klebsiella) were observed co-existing in an individual bird. All the colistin-resistant isolates were obtained from birds trapped around the reception area (300-800 m away).

Multidrug resistance

About 96% (23/24) of all the colistin-resistant isolates that were subjected to multidrug resistant tests showed resistance to at least one of the following antimicrobial agents: Ampicillin, Streptomycin, Oxytetracyline and Ciprofloxacin. Only one isolate (Citrobacter sp.) did not show resistance to any of the antimicrobial agents used for the multidrug resistance test. About Sixty-seven percent (16/24) showed resistance to 2 of the antimicrobial agents while 50% (12/24) were multidrug resistant.

About thirteen percent (3/24) of the isolates were resistant to Ciprofloxacin, 95.8% (23/24) to Ampicillin, 66.6% (16/24) to Oxytetracycline and 50% (12/24) to Streptomycin (Figure 2). There was a significant difference in resistant isolates to the 4 antimicrobial tested (P < .05).

Figure 2.

Multidrug resistance test results of bacterial isolates. Percentages of antimicrobial sensitivity of the isolates to the antimicrobials ciprofloxacin (CIP), ampicillin (AMP), oxytetracycline (OXY) and streptomycin (STR).

10.1177_11786302211017687-fig2.tif

About 68% (6/9) of the birds harboured multidrug resistant bacteria isolates. Multidrug resistance was recorded in 5 bird species: Yellow-whiskered Greenbul, Red-tailed Bristlebill, Olive Sunbird, Icterine Greenbul and Forest Robin.

Discussion

The findings of the study revealed that the forest birds captured harboured bacteria that belonged to 10 genera of gram-negative enterobacteriaceae, an indication that several species of bacteria may be present in the birds. Bacteria genera identified were similar to those isolated from wild birds associated with animal production and farmlands.38

Resistance to colistin was observed in 6.5% of the birds. It has also been reported in bacterial isolates from humans, food-producing animals, companion animals and the environment.39,40 Being a last line antimicrobial agent for the treatment of pan-drug resistance caused by gram-negative bacteria, emergence of resistance to this antimicrobial is raising a lot of concerns worldwide.41 The first case of colistin-resistance in wild birds was detected in a bacterial isolate from a migratory bird (European herring gull Larus argentatus) in 2016.42 In this study, resistance to colistin was unanticipated, mainly because samples were collected from birds in a protected area where human-wildlife interaction is limited compared to migratory waterbirds such as gulls.

Antimicrobial resistance is a major concern, particularly in Africa where the climate is conducive to the survival of most bacteria in the environment, however, many countries on the continent lack regulations on the use of antimicrobial agents.43 The non-therapeutic/sub-therapeutic usage of antimicrobial agents has been blamed for the spike in antimicrobial resistance.44,45 In the case of Ghana, there was no policy on the use of antimicrobials until 2018.42 Before the policy was launched, weak regulations existed for antimicrobial use for human but none for animals.46 Some studies on the use of antimicrobial agents among poultry farmers in Ghana found active ingredients including colistin.29,30 It is possible that some livestock farmers in the rural communities surrounding the protected area may be using these medicated feed to enhance their production, hence, the occurrence of colistin resistance only in isolates from birds that were sampled close to the reception area. In addition, farmers do not adhere strictly to withdrawal periods for antimicrobial usage in farm animals 29,30,47 making it highly possible for antibiotic residue transfer. Few studies have reported colistin resistance from clinical samples in Ghana,48 suggesting the possibility that human population in surrounding communities of the protected area could be harbouring colistin-resistant bacteria from the consumption of meat from livestock with antimicrobial residue. These surrounding human populations could disseminate resistant bacteria via indiscriminate exposure of faecal matter as most of the communities had no places of convenience and often used a nearby bush.21 Furthermore, resistance may be spread to other parts of the conservation area far from the reception area by wildlife rangers. These rangers go on routine patrols and spend days covering vast distances; they could shed resistant isolates via faecal matter/urine as there may not be places of convenience depending on where they find themselves in the protected area.

Some gram-negative bacterial species including, but not limited to, the following: Burkhlderia cepacia complex, Edwardsiella tarta, Morganella morganii, Proteus spp., Providencia spp, Serratia spp. are known to show intrinsic resistance to colistin.4955 However, none of the colistin-resistant isolates obtained from this study belonged to any of these bacteria genera, suggesting that resistance in the isolates from our study may have been acquired.

The mechanism of acquiring resistance genes may occur by mutation or by the horizontal transfer of resistance genes via mobile genetic elements such as plasmids, integrons and transposon.56 Among bacteria, plasmid-mediated transmission is the most common mechanism of horizontal gene transfer.57 Plasmid-mediated resistance is the transfer of antibiotic resistance genes via plasmids.58 Plasmids can be transferred between the same species of bacteria or different species via a mechanism known as conjugation.59 Plasmid-mediated genes have the potential to transfer resistance, unlike intrinsic resistance that is caused by functional expression or mutation of chromosomal genes.60 Since, the presence of plasmid-mediated genes was not investigated in this study, it could not be established whether resistant isolates had corresponding resistance genes.

All the colistin-resistant isolates were obtained from birds that were either omnivores or insectivores, yet, this may not be used as a risk factor since there were other omnivorous and insectivorous birds that did not harbour gram-negative bacteria, or colistin-resistant bacteria, suggesting that there may be a combination of factors that determine colonization of drug-resistant bacteria.

Since colistin is used in the treatment of multidrug resistant infections caused by gram-negative bacteria, all the colistin-resistant isolates were subjected to a multidrug resistance test. From the multidrug test, resistance to Ampicillin was demonstrated in 95.8% of the isolates. In a study of a wild migratory bird in Asia,42 it was observed that colistin-resistant isolates were also resistant to Ampicillin. Bacteria genera such as Enterobacter and Klebsiella have been reported to show an intrinsic resistance to ampicillin.61 Therefore, the high resistance to ampicillin may be intrinsic.

Our results are comparable to the results of a study that tested multidrug resistance of bacterial isolates from birds in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest to 5 antimicrobial agents (ampicillin, chloramphenicol, kanamycin, streptomycin and tetracycline) and found that 10% of their isolates showed a multidrug resistance pattern of ampicillin-tetracycline-chloramphenicol.15 In this study, however, 50% of the isolates showed the multidrug resistance pattern of ampicillin-tetracycline-streptomycin. The presence of ampicillin, oxytetracycline and streptomycin in bacterial isolates corroborates findings on antimicrobial agent resistance to enterobacteriaceae from a variety of birds worldwide.6265

Resistance to ciprofloxacin was the least observed in the multidrug resistance test. This antimicrobial agent belongs to the drug class quinolone which has had a restricted use in veterinary medicine since the 1990s after the rapid emergence of resistance to fluoroquinolones.66 If our inference that acquisition of resistance is from livestock, then the above could explain the low resistance to ciprofloxacin. Moreover, in Ghana, some studies have reported the commonest quinolone used in animal production is enfloxacin and not ciprofloxacin.31,67 Conversely, a study in Ghana investigating multidrug resistance in human isolates showed high levels of Ciprofloxacin resistance (>50%).68 Ciprofloxacin is recommended for the treatment of urinary tract and blood stream infections in Ghana.34

This study was limited in some aspects for example, the 2 methods of bacteria identification were not adequate to confirm the species of bacteria. In addition, the number of antimicrobial agents used for the multidrug resistance test was few. Furthermore, colistin-resistant isolates were not examined for resistance genes, therefore, it could not be established whether resistant isolates actually had corresponding resistance genes. Nonetheless, this study has provided useful preliminary firsthand data on determination of antimicrobial resistance in wild birds from the Ankasa Conservation Area.

Conclusion

Despite the Ankasa Conservation Area being a protected area, antimicrobial resistance as well as multidrug resistance were observed in bacterial isolates sampled from birds inhabiting the area suggesting that although the area is protected, contaminations from external sources occur. This study has added on to the limited information on antimicrobial resistance in wild animals from protected areas in Ghana by providing data from which some observations/inferences were drawn. Firstly, resistance to colistin was observed, suggesting there is potential for the spread of resistant bacteria in the protected area. Secondly, it is possible that some of the gram-negative isolates that showed resistance to colistin may be pathogens that cause significant infection in humans. Thirdly, transmission of antimicrobial resistant bacteria may occur between wild animals, livestock and humans. However, the transmission routes remain unclear, though direct contacts with contaminated food, water and soil seem to be important routes for transmission. Finally, proximity of protected areas to human influenced habitats such as settlements and farmlands may pose more risk of acquiring antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, hence the need for buffer zones around protected areas.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the University of Ghana /Carnegie Corporation of New York funded project, Next Generation of Academics in Africa, for financial support for this research. We thank the Ghana Forestry Commission for granting access to the Ankasa Conservation Area to do this study, Mr. David Daramani of the Ghana Wildlife Society for helping to identify the bird species and Dr. Juliet Ewool for assisting with bacteria isolation.

Supplemental material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

1.

Dudley N . Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories. IUCN; 2008. doi: https://doi.org/10.2305/iucn.ch.2008.paps.2.en Google Scholar

2.

Le Saout S , Hoffmann M , Shi Y , et al. Protected areas and effective biodiversity conservation. Science. 2013;342:803–805. Google Scholar

3.

Macdonald DW , Johnson PJ , Albrechtsen L , et al. Bushmeat trade in the Cross-Sanaga rivers region: evidence for the importance of protected areas. Biol Conserv. 2012;147:107–114. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.12.018 Google Scholar

4.

Palmgren H , McCafferty D , Aspán A , et al. Salmonella in sub-Antarctica: low heterogeneity in salmonella serotypes in South Georgian seals and birds. Epidemiol Infect. 2000;125:257–262. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268899004586 Google Scholar

5.

Bonnedahl J , Olsen B , Waldenström J , et al. Antibiotic susceptibility of faecal bacteria in Antarctic penguins. Polar Biol. 2008;31:759–763. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-008-0430-3 Google Scholar

6.

Thaller MC , Migliore L , Marquez C , et al. Tracking acquired antibiotic resistance in commensal bacteria of galápagos land iguanas: no man, no resistance. PLoS One. 2010;5:e8989. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008989 Google Scholar

7.

Ramey AM , Hernandez J , Tyrlöv V , et al. Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli in migratory birds inhabiting remote Alaska. Ecohealth. 2018;6:323–334. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-017-1302-5 Google Scholar

8.

Wheeler E , Hong PY , Bedon LC , Mackie RI . Carriage of antibiotic-resistant enteric bacteria varies among sites in Galapagos reptiles. J Wildl Dis. 2012;48:5–67. doi: https://doi.org/10.7589/0090-3558-48.1.56 Google Scholar

9.

Atterby C , Ramey AM , Hall GG , Järhult J , Börjesson S , Bonnedahl J . Increased prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in gulls sampled in Southcentral Alaska is associated with urban environments. Infect Ecol Epidemiol. 2016;6:323–334. doi: https://doi.org/10.3402/IEE.V6.32334 Google Scholar

10.

Cerdà-Cuéllar M , Moré E , Ayats T , et al. Do humans spread zoonotic enteric bacteria in Antarctica? Sci Total Environ. 2019;654:190–196. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.272 Google Scholar

11.

Carroll D , Wang J , Fanning S , Mcmahon BJ . Antimicrobial resistance in wildlife: implications for public health. Zoonoses Public Health. 2015;62:534–542. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/zph.12182 Google Scholar

12.

Dolejska M , Cizek A , Literak I . High prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant genes and integrons in Escherichia coli isolates from Black-headed Gulls in the Czech Republic. J Appl Microbiol. 2007;103:11–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03241.x Google Scholar

13.

Bonnedahl J , Drobni M , Gauthier-Clerc M , et al. Dissemination of Escherichia coli with CTX-M type ESBL between humans and yellow-legged gulls in the south of France. PLoS One. 2009;4:e5958. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005958 Google Scholar

14.

Radhouani H , Silva N , Poeta P , Torres C , Correia S , Igrejas G . Potential impact of antimicrobial resistance in wildlife, environment, and human health. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:23. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00023 Google Scholar

15.

Nascimento AMA , Cursino L , Gonçalves-Dornelas H , Reis A , Chartone-Souza E , Marini MÂ . Antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacteria in birds from the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Condor. 2003;105:358–361. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/condor/105.2.358 Google Scholar

16.

Waldenström J , Mevius D , Veldman K , Broman T , Hasselquist D , Olsen B . Antimicrobial resistance profiles of Campylobacter jejuni isolates from wild birds in Sweden. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:2438–2441. doi: https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.5.2438-2441.2005 Google Scholar

17.

Guenther S , Grobbel M , Lübke-Becker A , et al. Antimicrobial resistance profiles of Escherichia coli from common European wild bird species. Vet Microbiol. 2010;144:219–225. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.12.016 Google Scholar

18.

Borquaye LS , Ekuadzi E , Darko G , et al. Occurrence of antibiotics and antibiotic-resistant bacteria in landfill sites in Kumasi, Ghana. J Chem. 2019;2019:1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6934507 Google Scholar

19.

IUCN/PACO. Parks and Reserves of Ghana: Management Effectiveness Assessment of Protected Areas. IUCN; 2010. Google Scholar

20.

Forestry Commission of Ghana (FCG). Nini Suhien National Park and Ankasa resource reserve. 2018. Accessed February 20, 2018.  www.fcghana.org Google Scholar

21.

Damnyag L , Saastamoinen O , Blay D , Dwomoh FK , Anglaaere LCN , Pappinen A . Sustaining protected areas: identifying and controlling deforestation and forest degradation drivers in the Ankasa Conservation Area, Ghana. Biol Conserv. 2013;165:86–94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.05.024 Google Scholar

22.

Mallord JW , Orsman CJ , Roberts JT , Skeen RQ , Maiga AI , Issa OB . First evidence for recurrence of Wood Warblers Phylloscopus sibilatrix in sub-Saharan Africa. Ringing Migr. 2017;32:25–27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03078698.2017.1332235 Google Scholar

23.

Quinn PJ , Markey BK , Leonard FC , Hartigan P , Fanning S , Fitzpatrick E . Veterinary Microbiology and Microbial Disease. John Wiley & Sons; 2011. Google Scholar

24.

Dashti AA , Jadaon MM , Abdulsamad AM , Dashti HM . Heat treatment of bacteria: a simple method of DNA extraction for molecular techniques. Kuwait Med J. 2009;41:117–122. Google Scholar

25.

Lane DJ . 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In: Stackebrandt E , Goodfellow M , , eds. Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics. Wiley; 1991:115–176. Google Scholar

26.

Bahobail A , El-Rab SMF , Amin GA . Locally isolated bacterial strains with multiple degradation potential capabilities on petroleum hydrocarbon pollutants. Adv Microbiol. 2016;6:852. Google Scholar

27.

Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically; Approved Standard. 10th ed. CLSI Document M07-A9. CLSI; 2015. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.91790 Google Scholar

28.

Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 27th ed. CLSI Supplement M100. CLSI; 2017. Google Scholar

29.

Annan-Prah A , Agbemafle E , Asare PT , Akorli SY . Antibiotic use, abuse and their public health implication: the contributory role of management flaws in the poultry industry in two agro-ecological zones in Ghana. J Vet Adv. 2012;2:199–208. Google Scholar

30.

Boamah VEE , Agyare C , Odoi H , Dalsgaard A . Antibiotic practices and factors influencing the use of antibiotics in selected poultry farms in Ghana. J Antimicrob Agents. 2016;2:120. doi: https://doi.org/10.4172/2472-1212.1000120 Google Scholar

31.

Osei Sekyere J . antibiotic types and handling practices in disease management among pig farms in Ashanti region, Ghana. J Vet Med. 2014;2014:1–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/531952 Google Scholar

32.

Dsani E , Afari EA , Danso-Appiah A , Kenu E , Kaburi BB , Egyir B . Antimicrobial resistance and molecular detection of extended spectrum β-lactamase producing Escherichia coli isolates from raw meat in Greater Accra region, Ghana. BMC Microbiol. 2020;20:1–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-01935-z Google Scholar

33.

Afriyie DK , Gyansa-Lutterodt M , Amponsah SK , et al. Susceptibility pattern of uropathogens to ciprofloxacin at the ghana police hospital. Pan Afr Med J. 2015;22:1–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2015.22.87.6037 Google Scholar

34.

Ministry of Health (GNDP) Ghana. Standard Treatment Guidelines. 10th ed.Accra; 2010.  https://www.moh.gov.gh/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Standard-Treatment-Guideline-2010.pdf Google Scholar

35.

Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 28th ed. CLSI Document M100. CLSI; 2018. Google Scholar

36.

Festus I , Id J , Oguttu J , Jaja CJ , Green E . Prevalence and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants of Escherichia coli isolates obtained from meat in South Africa. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0216914. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216914 Google Scholar

37.

R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2018.  https://www.r-project.org/ Google Scholar

38.

Chung DM , Ferree E , Simon DM , Yeh PJ . Patterns of bird-bacteria associations. Ecohealth. 2018;15:627–641. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-018-1342-5 Google Scholar

39.

Cloeckaert A , Kempf I , Battisti A , et al. Molecular epidemiology of mcr-encoded colistin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae from food-producing animals in Italy revealed through the EU harmonized antimicrobial resistance monitoring. 2018;9:1217. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01217 Google Scholar

40.

Al-Tawfiq JA , Laxminarayan R , Mendelson M . How should we respond to the emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance in humans and animals? Int J Infect Dis. 2017;54:77–84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2016.11.415 Google Scholar

41.

Elbediwi M , Li Y , Paudyal N , et al. Microorganisms global burden of colistin-resistant bacteria: mobilized colistin resistance genes study (1980-2018). 2019;7:461. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7100461 Google Scholar

42.

Mohsin M , Raza S , Roschanski N , Schaufler K , Guenther S . First description of plasmid-mediated colistin-resistant extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in a wild migratory bird from Asia. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2016;4:463–464. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.07.001 Google Scholar

43.

Okeke IN , Laxminarayan R , Bhutta ZA , et al. Antimicrobial resistance in developing countries. Part I: recent trends and current status. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5:481–493. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(05)70189-4 Google Scholar

44.

Chattopadhyay MK , Zurek L , Nosanchuk JD . Use of antibiotics as feed additives: a burning question. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:334. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00334 Google Scholar

45.

Viswanathan V . Gut microbes off-label abuse of antibiotics by bacteria VK Viswanathan. Gut Microbes. 2014;5:3–4. doi: https://doi.org/10.4161/gmic.28027 Google Scholar

46.

Yevutsey SK , Buabeng KO , Aikins M , et al. Situational analysis of antibiotic use and resistance in Ghana: policy and regulation. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:1–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4910-7 Google Scholar

47.

Donkor ES , Newman MJ , Tay SCK , Dayie NTKD , Bannerman E , Olu-Taiwo M . Investigation into the risk of exposure to antibiotic residues contaminating meat and egg in Ghana. Food Control. 2011;22:869–873. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.11.014 Google Scholar

48.

Agyepong N , Govinden U , Owusu-Ofori A , et al. Genomic characterization of multidrug-resistant ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from a Ghanaian teaching hospital. Int J Infect Dis. 2019;85:117–123. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2019.05.025 Google Scholar

49.

Muyembe T , Vandepitte J , Desmyter J . Natural colistin resistance in Edwardsiella tarda. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1973;4:521–524. doi: https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.4.5.521 Google Scholar

50.

Rózalski A , Sidorczyk Z , Kotełko K . Potential virulence factors of Proteus bacilli. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1997;61:65–89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1128/.61.1.65-89.1997 Google Scholar

51.

Loutet SA , Valvano MA . Extreme antimicrobial peptide and polymyxin B Resistance in the genus Burkholderia. Front Microbiol. 2011;22:1:6. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2011.00159 Google Scholar

52.

Biswas S , Brunel JM , Dubus JC , Reynaud-Gaubert M , Rolain JM . Colistin: an update on the antibiotic of the 21st century. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2012;10:917–934. doi: https://doi.org/10.1586/eri.12.78 Google Scholar

53.

Hayakawa K , Marchaim D , Divine GW , et al. Growing prevalence of Providencia stuartii associated with the increased usage of colistin at a tertiary health care center. Int J Infect Dis. 2012;16:646–648. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2012.05.1029 Google Scholar

54.

Merkier AK , Rodríguez MC , Togneri A , et al. Outbreak of a cluster with epidemic behavior due to Serratia marcescens after colistin administration in a hospital setting. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:2295–2302. doi: https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.03280-12 Google Scholar

55.

Samonis G , Korbila IP , Maraki S , et al. Trends of isolation of intrinsically resistant to colistin Enterobacteriaceae and association with colistin use in a tertiary hospital. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;33:1505–1510. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-014-2097-8 Google Scholar

56.

Middleton JH , Ambrose A . Enumeration and antibiotic resistance patterns of fecal indicator organisms isolated from migratory Canada geese (Branta canadensis). J Wildl Dis. 2005;41:334–341. doi: https://doi.org/10.7589/0090-3558-41.2.334 Google Scholar

57.

Davies J , Davies D . Origins and evolution of antibiotic resistance. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2010;74:417–433. Google Scholar

58.

Bennett PM . Plasmid encoded antibiotic resistance: acquisition and transfer of antibiotic resistance genes in bacteria. Br J Pharmacol. 2008;153:347–357. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0707607 Google Scholar

59.

Thomas CM , Nielsen KM . Focus on horizontal gene transfer mechanisms of, and barriers to, horizontal gene transfer between bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005;3:711–722. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1234 Google Scholar

60.

Liu YY , Wang Y , Walsh TR , et al. Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: a microbiological and molecular biological study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16:161–168. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00424-7 Google Scholar

61.

Davin-Regli A , Lavigne JP , Pagès JM . Enterobacter spp.: update on taxonomy, clinical aspects, and emerging antimicrobial resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019;32:1–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00002-19 Google Scholar

62.

Klein RJT , Nicholls RJ . Assessment of coastal vulnerability to climate change. Ambio. 1999;28:182–187. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-011-0165-0 Google Scholar

63.

Erskine RJ , Walker RD , Bolin CA , Bartlett PC , White DG . Trends in antibacterial susceptibility of mastitis pathogens during a seven-year period. J Dairy Sci. 2002;85:1111–1118. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74172-6 Google Scholar

64.

Schlegelová J , Babák V , Klímová E , et al. Prevalence of and resistance to anti-microbial drugs in selected microbial species isolated from bulk milk samples. J Vet Med Ser B. 2002;49:216–225. doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0450.2002.00520.x Google Scholar

65.

Schroeder CM , Meng J , Zhao S , et al. Antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli 026, 0103, 0111, 0128, and 0145 from animals and humans. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:1409. doi: https://doi.org/10.3201/eid0812.0200770 Google Scholar

66.

Engberg J , Aarestrup FM , Taylor DE , Gerner-Smidt P , Nachamkin I . Quinolone and macrolide resistance in Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli: resistance mechanisms and trends in human isolates. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7:24. doi: https://doi.org/10.3201/eid0701.010104 Google Scholar

67.

Johnson S , Bugyei K , Nortey P , Tasiame W . Antimicrobial drug usage and poultry production: case study in Ghana. Anim Prod Sci. 2019;59:177–182. doi: https://doi.org/10.1071/AN16832 Google Scholar

68.

Opintan JA , Newman MJ , Arhin RE , Donkor ES , Gyansa-Lutterodt M , Mills-Pappoe W . Laboratory-based nationwide surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in Ghana. Infect Drug Resist. 2015;8:379. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S88725 Google Scholar
© The Author(s) 2021 This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
Sawyerr Louisa Modupe, Ntiamoa-Baidu Yaa, Owusu Erasmus Henaku, Kenji Ohya, Suzuki Masato, Odoi Justice Opare, and Kayang Boniface Baboreka "Protected but not from Contamination: Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Bacteria from Birds in a Ghanaian Forest Protected Area," Environmental Health Insights 15(1), (10 June 2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/11786302211017687
Received: 14 January 2021; Accepted: 22 April 2021; Published: 10 June 2021
JOURNAL ARTICLE
PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top