Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
26 January 2023 A Statistical Investigation into the COVID-19 Outbreak Spread
Rehana Parvin
Author Affiliations +

OBJECTIVE:Coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) outbreaks have been reported in a range of climates worldwide, including Bangladesh. There is less evidence of a link between the COVID-19 pandemic and climatic variables. This research article’s purpose is to examine the relationship between COVID-19 outbreaks and climatic factors in Dhaka, Bangladesh.

METHODS:The daily time series COVID-19 data used in this study span from May 1, 2020, to April 14, 2021, for the study area, Dhaka, Bangladesh. The Climatic factors included in this study were average temperature, particulate matter (PM2.5), humidity, carbon emissions, and wind speed within the same timeframe and location. The strength and direction of the relationship between meteorological factors and COVID-19 positive cases are examined using the Spearman correlation. This study examines the asymmetric effect of climatic factors on the COVID-19 pandemic in Dhaka, Bangladesh, using the Nonlinear Autoregressive Distributed Lag (NARDL) model.

RESULTS:COVID-19 widespread has a substantial positive association with wind speed (r = .781), temperature (r = .599), and carbon emissions (r = .309), whereas PM2.5 (r = −.178) has a negative relationship at the 1% level of significance. Furthermore, with a 1% change in temperature, the incidence of COVID-19 increased by 1.23% in the short run and 1.53% in the long run, with the remaining variables remaining constant. Similarly, in the short-term, humidity was not significantly related to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, in the long term, it increased 1.13% because of a 1% change in humidity. The changes in PM2.5 level and wind speed are significantly associated with COVID-19 new cases after adjusting population density and the human development index.


The Coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) disease was first discovered in Wuhan, China, where a significant outbreak is caused by the disease’s rapid transmission from person to person. Because of COVID-19, the world has seen a health epidemic spread so swiftly across countries, damaging complex health systems, and threatening the whole economy.1 There are some significant parameters that are responsible for the rapid spread of COVID-19. These can include climate conditions, air quality, air pollution, and population density.2 Evidence suggests COVID-19-confirmed cases and deaths were shown to be higher in places with high levels of air pollution.3

Droplets, person-to-person transmission, infected objects, and airborne transmission are all ways for the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus to infect the respiratory system.4 If virus-carrying droplets or bioaerosols penetrate the human body through coughing or sneezing and reach an uninfected host, they can cause illness. Furthermore, any unprotected contact with an infected object increases the risk of the virus spreading. Another route for COVID-19 transfer is through the inhalation of small airborne particles with a diameter of less than 5 m.5,6

Several studies have been carried out to examine if the COVID-19 coronavirus may be transmitted through the environment. Pramanik et al7 discovered a significant relationship between COVID-19 occurrences and temperature in humid target areas. Temperature, PM2.5, and median age have all been reported to play a role in the propagation of COVID-19 in some studies.2,8 -12 There was no correlation between COVID-19 and 7-day lagged meteorological indicators, according to a study by Islam et al13 that looked into the relationship between weather conditions and COVID-19. Although COVID-19 and 14-day delayed temperature have a positive association, COVID-19 and 14-day lagged humidity have a negative relationship. It should be kept in mind that many diseases are contagious and can be transmitted through epidemiological mechanisms.9,14-16

Rosario et al17 revealed that high sun radiation, temperature, and wind speed all slowed the progression of COVID-19 cases. According to Li et al18, air pollution had a positive effect on COVID-19 new occurrences, but temperature had a negative effect. Pei et al19 found a strong correlation between COVID-19 cases and air quality, and COVID-19 cases and air quality, and their findings show a clear relationship between air pollution and temperature, but COVID-19 has a negative connection with carbon monoxide. Pearson correlation analysis was used by Tanis and Karakaya20 to examine the effects of air pollutants like PM2.5, PM10, nitrogen oxides (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), carbon monoxide (CO), ozone (O3), and SARS-CoV-2 cases. Simultaneously, other literature found a link between weather variables, like temperature and wind speed, and COVID-19 cases. In 3 Chinese cities, Jiang et al21 evaluated the relationship between air pollutants such as PM2.5, PM10, SO2, NO2, CO, and O3 daily meteorological factors of COVID-19. According to the researchers, in all cities, daily COVID-19 incidence was positively associated with PM10 and humidity, but negatively associated with PM10 and temperature.

The impact of weather-related and climatic variables on the COVID-19 outbreak in Canada was examined by Sarwar et al.22 They looked at how different meteorological factors influence COVID-19 spread and made the case that weather, and climate change significantly increase COVID-19 infections using key variables like daily COVID-19 cases, carbon dioxide emissions, nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), PM2.5, ozone (O3), average temperature, and humidity. According to their argument, the COVID-19 infection rate is significantly increased by weather and climate change.

In Jakarta, Indonesia, Tosepu23 used the Spearman rank correlation test to evaluate the relationship between climate data such as different situation of temperature, rainfall, humidity, and the daily confirmed cases of epidemic. Air pollution and weather variables are connected to COVID-19 confirmed cases and fatality rates. It can be explained by disparities in medical and health insurance systems, as well as regional policies in different cities and countries, according to Yuan et al24 and Suhaimi et al.4 The purpose of our research is to learn more about the COVID-19 virus’s propagation in Bangladesh by investigating the methods of climatic factors-to-human transmission and COVID-19-confirmed cases’ human-to-human transmission.

Simply expanding the forest canopy is not an effective strategy to reduce carbon emissions.25 In 2020, fossil CO2 emissions are expected to have decreased by 2.4 billion metric tons because of the global COVID-19 lockdowns, according to new calculations from University of East Anglia researchers (UEA). Compared to 2019, 184 countries’ combined carbon emissions decreased by 438 Mt in 2020. The reduction in carbon emissions during the pandemic will not be lasting because it is anticipated that global economic activity will gradually return to its pre-COVID-19 state. Therefore, it is crucial to look into the relationship between carbon emissions and Bangladesh’s COVID-19 status.

The relationship between the COVID-19 outbreak and climatic or weather-related factors was investigated separately in the previous literature review. Bangladesh has a tropical monsoon climate and is primarily an air-polluted nation. The COVID-19 pandemic had the biggest negative economic impact on Bangladesh. After Pakistan and India, Bangladesh is the third country in South Asia to be affected. Therefore, it is crucial to investigate how Bangladesh’s COVID-19 pandemic is affected by climatic factors and air pollution. As previously indicated, most of the research has focused on the linear association between climatic factors and COVID-19. These variables, on the other hand, exhibit regular oscillations and nonlinear behavior, which have been disregarded in prior investigations. As a result, the nonlinear framework was applied in this study in Dhaka, Bangladesh, to fill in this gap. This study employed correlation measurements to examine the intensity of the association between climatic variables and COVID-19 spreads. This period included the use of Spearman’s correlation analysis. To arrive at novel results and recommendations, this study employed correlation measurements, including Spearman’s correlation analysis. As a result, we believe our paper will contribute to closing this gap in literature. The study’s research objectives are as follows:

  • to examine the link between climate variables like temperature, humidity, carbon emissions, wind speed, and PM2.5 on COVID-19 confirmed cases in Dhaka, Bangladesh.

  • to identify the distribution of COVID-19 confirmed cases asymmetrically or symmetrically linked to climate variables such as temperature, humidity, carbon emissions, wind speed, and PM2.5.

  • introducing methods can be utilized to halt the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Materials and Methods


The time-series data (daily) used for the study area, Dhaka, Bangladesh in this analysis span the dates of May 1, 2020, and April 14, 2021. Meteorological factors, such as average temperature (°C), PM2.5 (a proxy for air quality), humidity (%), carbon emissions (per capita), and wind speed (km/h) were selected for the study area. As control variables, 2 non-weather variables are used, such as population mass and the human development index. Table 1 summarizes the definitions and data sources.13,26,27 IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS version 19.0) and Eviews 10 were used to carry out the statistical analysis.

Table 1.

Definition and sources of the variables.



Correlation analysis

Since we are unsure at first whether the data are normally distributed or not, it is preferable to use non-parametric correlation analysis to determine whether there is a linear relationship between the variables. A previous study conducted using the same data characteristics, shown in Figure 1, revealed the relationship between environmental factors and the transmission of SARS-CoV-2.28 For empirical investigations, Spearman’s non-parametric correlation is used to look at the intensity and direction of the meteorological variables and COVID-19.

Figure 1.

Environmental factors and transmission of SARS-CoV-2.28


The formula for calculating the Spearman correlation coefficient is as follows:



Where, n is the total number of observations; di = rank of Xi − rank of Yi

NARDL model

We used a nonlinear autoregressive distribution lag (NARDL) model to study the long- and short-run nonlinear relations between the COVID-19 and climate variables, as described by Shin et al.29 Based on the prior work of Ibrahim30 and Lacheheb and Sirag31 and considering the nonlinear relationship between temperature, humidity, PM2.5, carbon emission, and wind speed in COVID-19 cases, our model will be as follows:



Equation 2 can be included in the NARDL equation with an unrestricted error correction representation. COVID defines COVID-19 daily cases, TEM defines temperature, and PM stands for PM2.5, CE stands for carbon emissions, Wind speed is denoted by WS, while humidity is represented by HUM.

Natural logarithms are abbreviated as “LN.” Where q and p indicate the lag order and and are long-run asymmetric effects of temperature, humidity, PM2.5, carbon emission, and wind speed on COVID-19 cases. Accordingly, fi01_01.gifare measure the short run asymmetric effects of temperature, humidity, PM2.5, carbon emission, and wind speed on COVID-19 cases.

Where, the long-term variables are related to β2.5. Positive changes TEM+ , HUM+ , PM+ CE+ , and WS+ as well as negative changes TEM , HUM , PM CE, and WS+ respectively, incorporating the nonlinear impact of our study’s variables. The decomposition of the NARDL model into a partial sum of positive and negative changes is shown by the xi in the following equation:





We first looked at the order of integration of the chosen variables using the well-known Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) and Phillips-Perron (PP) tests. Second, we evaluated the existence of a long-run link between variables using a bound testing methodology devised by Pesaran et al32 and Shin et al.29 Using the F-test, we checked the null hypothesis Third, we demonstrate both long run and short-run asymmetric correlations among the variables using the Wald test. Finally, we show how a 1% difference in the positive and negative lag values of independent variables can cause asymmetric cumulative dynamic multiplier (CDM) effects. Obtaining the CDM of a unit change allows us to assess the asymmetric effect as well in and on y.



Findings and Discussion

 Supplemental Appendix 1 shows the descriptive statistics, where each variable is normally distributed and has 5% significant levels using the Jarque-Bera test statistic. Figure 2 plots daily confirmed cases against meteorological conditions to highlight each study variable’s unique contribution to COVID-19 verified cases. COVID-19 prevalence is intricately tied to climate conditions, as seen in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

COVID-19 daily-confirmed cases versus climatic factors.


Table 2 contains the results of the Spearman correlation test. The COVID-19 instances and temperature have a favorable and substantial relationship, according to our study. Temperature and the COVID-19 pandemic have a moderate, an advantageous, and important connection (r = .599) at the 1% level of significance, which is consistent with the previous studies in Bangladesh.2,24,27,33 Some previous studies revealed that COVID-19 transmission is decreased at low ambient temperatures2,12 and that there is a positive and significant connection between temperature and the COVID-19 pandemic.10,34 -36

Table 2.

Test results of Spearman’s correlation.


COVID-19 has a mild, negative, and significant association with humidity (r = −.087) and a strong, positive, and significant relationship with wind speed (r = .781), according to our data. Hridoy,26 Pal and Masum,27 and Pavel33 discovered a significant relationship between PM2.5 and COVID-19. Some other studies8,10,37,38 have shown that COVID-19 and PM2.5 have a negative, weak, and significant relationship at 1% level of significance. Consistent with these studies, we found in Dhaka, Bangladesh, that PM2.5 and the COVID-19 outbreak have a significant relationship. According to the study, COVID-19 and carbon emissions had a positive, weak relationship (r = .309). Air pollution and climate variables such as temperature, humidity, carbon emissions, wind speed, and PM2.5 have been connected to the increasing number of COVID-19 daily cases in Dhaka, Bangladesh.

The ADF, PP, and KPSS tests were employed for stationary tests in our empirical study, and the findings are summarized in Table 3. The Schwarz information criteria (SIC) were used to find the optimal lag structure. According to the ADF tests, daily COVID-19 confirmed cases are stationary at level, suggesting I (0) according to ADF test, and PM2.5 is stationary at level, indicating I (0), whereas all study variables are stationary at the first difference, indicating variables are I (1), according to both tests. We can use the bound testing methods for co-integration to evaluate equation (2) when the I (2) variables. The KPSS test, which is favorable to stationarity for all at first difference series, supports the findings.

Table 3.

Unit root test results.


By using the traditional VAR model, we optimized the lag, and based on the AIC criterion, we chose lag “1” as the best lag, as shown in  Supplemental Appendix 2. Table 4 shows the bound test results of model estimation for the existence of linear and nonlinear co-integration. Because the F-statistic result of 3.258530 is bigger than the necessary lower limit of 2.62, it reveals that there is an inconclusive decision in a linear form and smaller than the necessary upper limit of 3.79 at 5%. At 5%, the t-statistic result of −3.649323 is higher than the required lower limit of −2.86 and is lower than the required upper limit of −4.19. In a linear approach, the bound test demonstrates that there is an inconclusive decision. On the other hand, the results of the non-linear ARDL specification indicate the long-run existence of cointegration, as the value of the F-statistic, which is 9.763696, exceeds the upper critical constraint of 3.04 at 5%, while the t-statistic value of −9.655781 exceeds the upper critical constraint of −5.03 at 5%.

Table 4.

Bounds test results for co-integration.


Table 5 shows the NARDL asymmetric estimates. Control variables such as population density have positive and insignificant effects on COVID-19 instances, while another control variable, the human index, has negative and insignificant effects on COVID-19 cases. Table 6 shows the findings of NARDL’s short- and long-run estimates. COVID-19 instances are reduced by 1.14% in the short run and increase 1.13% in the long run by a 1% increase in humidity, according to the findings. Reduced humidity, on the other hand, had no influence on COVID-19 instances in the short or long term. COVID-19 is connected to relative humidity, according to other studies.11,12,26,38 PM2.5 has a favorable and positive long-term and short-term effect on COVID-19 daily cases, according to our study. According to the findings, a 1% rise in PM2.5 increased COVID-19 instances by 0.124785% in the short run and 0.077525% in the long run, resulting in a 0.077525% increase in COVID-19 cases.

Table 5.

NARDL estimate results.


Table 6.

NARDL short run and long run estimates.


In the short run, there are no significant effects on COVID-19 due to the positive change in carbon emissions, but a 1% increase in carbon emissions reduces the daily cases by 0.489567% in long run. Temperature and wind speed, 2 other study variables, have the highest impact on COVID-19 daily cases. The study findings indicate that a 1% increase in temperature raises COVID-19 incidences by 1.232585% in the short run and 1.525774% in the long run. Reduced temperatures, on the other hand, have no influence on daily cases in the short term but have a favorable and considerable effect on daily cases in the long term. Maximum temperature has a considerable effect on COVID-19 transmission, according to recent studies by Hridoy,26 Shao et al,40 Pani et al,34 and Kumar.41 This discovery was made, unlike several recent studies that revealed a negative link between temperature and COVID-19 transmission ability.35,42,43

In the short run, a 1% increase in wind speed increases COVID-19 instances by 0.147853%, while in the long run; it increases COVID-19 instances by 0.880555%, according to the findings. Reduced wind speed, on the other hand, has no significant influence on everyday instances in the short term but has positive and significant effects in the long term. COVID-19 transmission was shown to be significantly affected by maximum wind speed, which is consistent with earlier studies.2,26,44 -46 According to Li et al,18 there is no correlation between wind speed and the ability to transmit COVID-19, while Islam et al2 found a negative correlation. Air pollution and climate variables such as temperature, humidity, carbon emissions, wind speed, and PM2.5 are asymmetrically associated with the spread of COVID-19 confirmed cases in Dhaka, Bangladesh, according to our findings.

The current study indicated that temperature and wind speed had a beneficial effect on COVID-19 transmission in Dhaka, Bangladesh; this conclusion is consistent with prior research and backs up the findings of Bashir et al47 and Tosepu.23 Research from the past supports the positive impact of humidity on COVID-19 transmission in Dhaka.2,38,48,49 This study supports prior research in that wind speed has a positive impact on COVID-19 transmission.2,50 This could let virus particles last longer in dirty air, allowing SARS-CoV-2 to spread through a more indirect route.

The NARDL co-integration test validates the presence or absence of asymmetric co-integration among the variables in the model but does not identify causation direction. As a result, we applied positive and negative TEM, HUM, PM, CE, and WS changes to COVID-19 cases to test for Granger causality, and the results are presented in Table 7. The findings demonstrated that COVID-19 instances are caused by positive shocks to the TEM, HUM, CE, and WS in the short run. The negative shock of TEM, HUM, CE, and WS, on the other hand, was found to be the underlying cause of COVID-19 instances in the short term. However, the findings demonstrated that the negative shock of all variables is the fundamental cause of COVID-19 instances in the long term.

Table 7.

NARDL long run and short Granger Causality results.


The positive change curve will show asymmetric adjustments in COVID-19 cases due to positive TEM changes, whereas the negative change curve has shown negative adjustments in COVID-19 cases due to negative TEM changes. HUM, PM, CE, and WS are all explained in the same way. Negative TEM shocks, positive PM2.5 shocks, negative wind speed, and negative HUM shocks had the highest influence on COVID-19 cases, according to all the dynamic multiplier values. According to Figure 3, positive and negative shocks of CE, on the other hand, had the same influence on COVID-19 cases.

Figure 3.

Cumulative dynamic multipliers (CDM) effects on COVID-19 daily cases by climatic parameters.


Some diagnostic tests were also performed to support the NARDL model’s dependability, as shown in Table 8. The NARDL model is reliable because all diagnostic tests demonstrate its accuracy. The adjustment speed, according to our statistics, is −0.45321, indicating a 45% rise in significance in the previous period to attain equilibrium. To confirm the nonlinearities between the variables under examination, the Wald test was performed. Table 8’s findings, which show asymmetries between variables at a 5% level of significance, are presented. We performed the CUSUM and CUSUM Square tests to check the model’s stability. Figure 4 depicts the outcomes of these tests and demonstrates the stability of the model.

Table 8.

Diagnostic test and Wald test results.


Figure 4.

Cumulative sum (CSUM) and cumulative sum square (CSUM squares) test for model stability test.


Public health agencies depend on traditional ways to control and monitor the expansion of infectious diseases.51 Interventions and practices related to water, sanitation, and hygiene are essential for COVID-19 prevention.52 The ongoing pandemic significantly interacts with the social determinants of environmental health, as evidenced by the significant spread in low-income areas not only in Latin America and Asia but also in the developed world. These factors include low income, inadequate housing, lack of access to safe drinking water and food, unsanitary living conditions, and inadequate infrastructure.53 This study advises the following key COVID-19 preventative behaviors, despite the introduction of vaccinations as a tool for prevention against COVID-19 and the appropriate use of masks: avoiding crowded or poorly ventilated spaces or wearing a mask in these spaces; practicing proper hand hygiene; maintaining hygiene; cleaning and disinfecting frequently touched objects and surfaces; and maintaining your overall health. In their study, Rao et al,54 found that instead of getting themselves checked out right away and only getting tested and treated by a doctor when their health deteriorates, people who develop COVID-19 symptoms turn to Google for confirmation and treatment. At that point, hospitalization is the only choice due to the patients’ critical conditions. Due to capacity issues and elevated mortality rates, this puts an unsustainable burden on hospitals. In order to forecast COVID-19 waves, mobilize the healthcare system, save lives, and promote frictionless growth, they advise using Google Trends data.

This study has some limitations because COVID-19 transmission can be complicated by factors like the quantity of tests that have been successfully completed, public opposition, internal migration, human behavior, and cultural and economic factors. We were also limited to only looking at Dhaka, Bangladesh. Furthermore, another limitation in this study is that we considered daily COVID-19 cases nationally and considered the climate variables in some specific stations around Dhaka. In future studies, we will consider confounding factors linked to COVID-19′s spread in Bangladesh as a whole. Further research will be needed to generalize the relationship between COVID-19 cases and climate variables.

Conclusion and Policy Suggestions

The importance of meteorological and non-meteorological factors in COVID-19′s rapid spread in Dhaka, Bangladesh is highlighted in this paper. Local COVID-19 transmission is closely linked to climate conditions in Dhaka, according to the findings. This study explores the link between temperature, carbon dioxide, humidity, PM2.5, wind speed, and COVID-19 in Dhaka, Bangladesh, and offers both intriguing and conflicting results. Two non-climatic factors, such as population density and the Human Development Index, are utilized as control variables. Furthermore, the NARDL findings show that all our study factors had significant asymmetric effects on COVID-19 in Dhaka, Bangladesh, both short- and long term. Increases in temperature are associated with a lower risk of COVID, but humidity has the opposite effect. Increases in wind speed and PM2.5 have a favorable effect on COVID instances, according to NARDL studies, whereas a reduction in carbon emissions has a negative effect on COVID instances both in the short and long term. Moreover, decreasing COVID-19 cases can be attributed to increasing wind speed. The spread of COVID-19, however, has been significantly increased with increasing PM2.5 levels. New COVID-19 cases have a significant negative relationship with carbon emissions both in the short- and long-term lag non-linear relationship. The Wald test and dynamic multiplier graphs reveal that COVID-19 and climatic factors have an asymmetric connection.

This study suggests that for a sustainable ecosystem, governments, lawmakers, and businesses should reduce harmful gas emissions. The key findings of this study will aid decision-makers in determining the weather and economic factors that influence future pandemic risks. In order to come up with practical solutions to the problems of air pollution and global warming, policymakers and other management authorities will find the study’s findings to be very helpful. The results may aid in determining how COVID-19 transmission in Bangladesh is affected by seasonality.

The findings of this study may also be relevant for future research in other nations. More factors relating to COVID-19 incidence should be considered in future studies to further improve accuracy. In our subsequent study, we forecasted COVID-19 waves using Google Trends data to mobilize the healthcare system, save lives, and encourage frictionless growth in the context of Bangladesh. Virus resistance, the number of individuals infected, the size of the city, mobility, cleanliness, the usage of masks and sanitizers, and other COVID-19-related factors must be explored.

Author Contributions The study conceptualization, methodology, software, data analysis and validation were performed by R. Parvin. R. Parvin performed the draft preparation. R. Parvin performed the visualization and reviewed and edited the paper.

Supplemental Material Supplemental material for this article is available online.



Alam MS , Sultana R. Influences of climatic and non-climatic factors on COVID-19 outbreak: a review of existing literature. Environ Chall. 2021;5:100255. doi: Google Scholar


Islam ARMT , Hasanuzzaman M , Azad MAK , et al. Effect of meteorological factors on COVID-19 cases in Bangladesh. Environ Dev Sustain. 2021;23:9139–9162. Google Scholar


Sahoo MM . Significance between air pollutants, meteorological factors, and COVID-19 infections: probable evidence in India. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2021;28(30):40474-40495. Google Scholar


Suhaimi NF , Jalaludin J , Latif MT. Demystifying a possible relationship between COVID-19, air quality and meteorological factors: evidence from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Aerosol Air Qual Res. 2020;20:1520–1529. Google Scholar


Domingo JL , Marquès M , Rovira J . Influence of airborne transmission of SARS-Cov-2 on COVID-19 pandemic. A review. Environ Res. 2020;188:109861. Google Scholar


Rahimi NR , Fouladi-Fard R , Aali R , et al. Bidirectional association between COVID-19 and the environment: a systematic review. Environ Res. 2021;194:110692. Google Scholar


Pramanik M , Udmale P , Bisht P , Chowdhury K , Szabo S , Pal I. Climatic factors influence the spread of COVID-19 in Russia. Int J Environ Health Res. 2022;32:723–737. Google Scholar


Gupta S , Raghuwanshi GS , Chanda A. Effect of weather on COVID-19 spread in the US: a prediction model for India in 2020. Sci Total Environ. 2020;728:138860. Google Scholar


Prata DN , Rodrigues W , Bermejo PH. Temperature significantly changes COVID-19 transmission in (sub)tropical cities of Brazil. Sci Total Environ. 2020;729:138862. Google Scholar


Qi H , Xiao S , Shi R , et al. COVID-19 transmission in mainland China is associated with temperature and humidity: a time-series analysis. Sci Total Environ. 2020;728. doi: Google Scholar


Wang M , Jiang A , Gong L , et al. Temperature significantly changed COVID-19 transmission in 429 cities. Preprint. Posted online February 25, 2020. doi: Google Scholar


Ma Y , Zhao Y , Liu J , et al. Effects of temperature variation and humidity on the mortality of COVID-19 in Wuhan. Preprint. Posted online March 18, 2020. doi: Google Scholar


Islam N , Bukhari Q , Jameel Y , et al. COVID-19 and climatic factors: a global analysis. Environ Res. 2021;193:110355. Google Scholar


Shi P , Dong Y , Yan H , et al. The impact of temperature and absolute humidity on the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak - evidence from China. Preprint. Posted online March 24, 2020. doi: Google Scholar


Espejo W , Celis JE , Chiang G , Bahamonde P. Environment and COVID-19: pollutants, impacts, dissemination, management and recommendations for facing future epidemic threats. Sci Total Environ. 2020;747:141314. Google Scholar


Shakil MH , Munim ZH , Tasnia M , Sarowar S. COVID-19 and the environment: a critical review and research agenda. Sci Total Environ. 2020;745:141022. Google Scholar


Rosario DKA , Mutz YS , Bernardes PC , Conte-Junior CA . Relationship between COVID-19 and weather: case study in a tropical country. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2020;229:113587. Google Scholar


Li H , Xu XL , Dai DW , Huang ZY , Ma Z , Guan YJ. Air pollution and temperature are associated with increased COVID-19 incidence: a time series study. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;97:278–282. Google Scholar


Pei L , Wang X , Guo B , Guo H , Yu Y. Do air pollutants as well as meteorological factors impact corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19)? Evidence from China based on the geographical perspective. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021;28:35584–35596. Google Scholar


Tanis C , Karakaya K. Investigating the impacts of air quality and weather indicators on the spread of SARS-Cov-2 in Istanbul, Turkey. Therm Sci. 2021;25:2755–2765. Google Scholar


Jiang Y , Xu X , Dai D , et al., eds. Effect of ambient air pollutants and meteorological factors on COVID-19 transmission. Preprint. Posted online April 20, 2020. doi: Google Scholar


Sarwar S , Shahzad K , Fareed Z , Shahzad U. A study on the effects of meteorological and climatic factors on the COVID-19 spread in Canada during 2020. J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2021;19:1513–1521. Google Scholar


Tosepu R , Gunawan J , Effendy DS , et al. Correlation between weather and Covid-19 pandemic in Jakarta, Indonesia. Science of the total environment, 2020;725:138436. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138436 Google Scholar


Yuan J , Wu Y , Jing W , et al. Non-linear correlation between daily new cases of COVID-19 and meteorological factors in 127 countries. Environ Res. 2021;193:110521. Google Scholar


Sarwar S , Waheed R , Farooq MU , Sarwar S. Investigate solutions to mitigate CO2 emissions: the case of China. J Environ Plan Manag. 2022;65:2054–2080. Google Scholar


Hridoy AEE , Mohiman M , Tusher SM , et al. Impact of meteorological parameters on COVID-19 transmission in Bangladesh: a spatiotemporal approach. Theor Appl Climatol. 2021;144(1):273-285. Google Scholar


Pal SK , Masum MH. Effects of meteorological parameters on COVID-19 transmission trends in Bangladesh. Environ Sustain. 2021;4:559–568. Google Scholar


Eslami H , Jalili M. The role of environmental factors to transmission of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). AMB Express. 2020;10:92. Google Scholar


Shin Y , Yu B , Greenwood-Nimmo M. Modelling asymmetric Cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. SSRN Electron J. 2014. doi: Google Scholar


Ibrahim MH. Oil and food prices in Malaysia: a nonlinear ARDL analysis. Agric Food Econ. 2015;3(1):1-14. doi: Google Scholar


Lacheheb M , Sirag A. Oil price and inflation in Algeria: a nonlinear ARDL approach. Q Rev Econ Finance. 2019;73:217–222. Google Scholar


Pesaran MH , Shin Y , Smith RJ. Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econ. 2001;16:289–326. Google Scholar


Pavel RS. Impact and correlation of air quality and climate variables with COVID-19 morbidity and mortality in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Adv Clin Toxicol. 2020;5. doi: Google Scholar


Pani SK , Lin NH , Ravindra Babu S. Association of COVID-19 pandemic with meteorological parameters over Singapore. Sci Total Environ. 2020;740:140112. Google Scholar


Shahzad K , Shahzad U , Iqbal N , Shahzad F , Fareed Z. Effects of climatological parameters on the outbreak spread of COVID-19 in highly affected regions of Spain. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020;27:39657–39666. Google Scholar


Xie J , Zhu Y. Association between ambient temperature and COVID-19 infection in 122 cities from China. Sci Total Environ. 2020;724:138201. Google Scholar


Zheng HL , Guo ZL , Wang ML , Yang C , An SY , Wu W. Effects of climate variables on the transmission of COVID-19: a systematic review of 62 ecological studies. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021;28:54299–54316. Google Scholar


Sajadi MM , Habibzadeh P , Vintzileos A , Shokouhi S , Miralles-Wilhelm F , Amoroso A. Temperature, humidity, and latitude analysis to estimate potential spread and seasonality of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Network Open. 2020;3:e2011834. Google Scholar


Narayan PK. The saving and investment nexus for China: evidence from cointegration tests. Appl Econ. 2005;37(17):1979-1990 Google Scholar


Shao W , Xie J , Zhu Y. Mediation by human mobility of the association between temperature and COVID-19 transmission rate. Environ Res. 2021;194:110608. Google Scholar


Kumar S. Effect of meteorological parameters on spread of COVID-19 in India and air quality during lockdown. Sci Total Environ. 2020;745:141021. Google Scholar


Liu J , Zhou J , Yao J , et al. Impact of meteorological factors on the COVID-19 transmission: a multi-city study in China. Sci Total Environ. 2020;726:138513. Google Scholar


Doğan B , Ben Jebli M , Shahzad K , Farooq TH , Shahzad U. Investigating the effects of meteorological parameters on COVID-19: case study of New Jersey, United States. Environ Res. 2020;191:110148. Google Scholar


Kulkarni H , Khandait H , Narlawar UW , Rathod P , Mamtani M. Independent association of meteorological characteristics with initial spread of COVID-19 in India. Sci Total Environ. 2021;764:142801. Google Scholar


Ahmadi M , Sharifi A , Dorosti S , Jafarzadeh Ghoushchi S , Ghanbari N. Investigation of effective climatology parameters on COVID-19 outbreak in Iran. Sci Total Environ. 2020;729:138705. Google Scholar


Singh O , Bhardwaj P , Kumar D. Association between climatic variables and COVID-19 pandemic in national capital territory of Delhi, India. Environ Dev Sustain. 2021;23:9514–9528. Google Scholar


Bashir MF , Ma BJ , Bilal BILAL , et al. Correlation between environmental pollution indicators and COVID-19 pandemic: a brief study in Californian context. Environ Res. 2020;187:109652. Google Scholar


Luo RF , Liu CF , Gao JJ , et al. Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on rural poverty and policy responses in China. J Integr Agric. 2020;19(12):2946–2964. Google Scholar


Goswam K , Bharali S , Hazarika J . Projections for COVID-19 pandemic in India and effect of temperature and humidity. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020;14(5):801–805. Google Scholar


Sarkodie SA , Owusu PA . Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on waste management. Environ Dev Sustain. 2021;23(5):7951–7960. Google Scholar


Sarwar S , Waheed R , Sarwar S , Khan A. COVID-19 challenges to Pakistan: is GIS analysis useful to draw solutions? Sci Total Environ. 2020;730:139089. Google Scholar


Desye B. COVID-19 pandemic and water, sanitation, and hygiene: impacts, challenges, and mitigation strategies. Environ Health Insights. 2021;15:11786302211029447. Google Scholar


Maipas S , Panayiotides IG , Tsiodras S , Kavantzas N. COVID-19 pandemic and environmental health: effects and the immediate need for a concise risk analysis. Environ Health Insights. 2021;15:1178630221996352. Google Scholar


Rao A , Sharma G , Pereira V , Shahzad U , Jabeen F. Analyzing cyberchondriac Google Trends data to forecast waves and avoid friction: lessons from COVID-19 in India. IEEE Trans Eng Manag. 2022;1–14. doi: Google Scholar
© The Author(s) 2023
Rehana Parvin "A Statistical Investigation into the COVID-19 Outbreak Spread," Environmental Health Insights 17(1), (26 January 2023).
Received: 14 October 2022; Accepted: 8 December 2022; Published: 26 January 2023
carbon emissions
coronavirus-19 (COVID-19)
dynamic multiplier
Nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag (NARDL)
Particulate matter (PM2.5)
Wald test
Back to Top