Translator Disclaimer
1 May 2008 Hypothesis Testing in Comparative and Experimental Studies of Function-Valued Traits
Author Affiliations +

Many traits of evolutionary interest, when placed in their developmental, physiological, or environmental contexts, are function-valued. For instance, gene expression during development is typically a function of the age of an organism and physiological processes are often a function of environment. In comparative and experimental studies, a fundamental question is whether the function-valued trait of one group is different from another. To address this question, evolutionary biologists have several statistical methods available. These methods can be classified into one of two types: multivariate and functional. Multivariate methods, including univariate repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), treat each trait as a finite list of data. Functional methods, such as repeated-measures regression, view the data as a sample of points drawn from an underlying function. A key difference between multivariate and functional methods is that functional methods retain information about the ordering and spacing of a set of data values, information that is discarded by multivariate methods. In this study, we evaluated the importance of that discarded information in statistical analyses of function-valued traits. Our results indicate that functional methods tend to have substantially greater statistical power than multivariate approaches to detect differences in a function-valued trait between groups.

Cortland K. Griswold, Richard Gomulkiewicz, and Nancy Heckman "Hypothesis Testing in Comparative and Experimental Studies of Function-Valued Traits," Evolution 62(5), 1229-1242, (1 May 2008).
Received: 22 June 2007; Accepted: 7 January 2008; Published: 1 May 2008

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.

Get copyright permission
Back to Top