Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
23 January 2020 A New Species of Torymus (Hymenoptera: Torymidae) Associated with Two Genera of Bruchinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in México
A. Lucía Pérez-Benavides, Fernando Hernández-Baz, Jorge M. González, Alejandro Zaldívar Riverón
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

A new parasitoid wasp species, Torymus moazopisp. nov. (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea: Torymidae), is described from Mexico. This new species was reared from seeds of Phaseolus vulgaris L. and Phaseolus lunatus L. (both Fabaceae) associated with some Bruchinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Torymus moazopisp. nov. is morphologically similar to Torymus atheatus Grissell (Hymenoptera: Torymidae), but it can be distinguished by its ovipositor length, thorax coloration, and the distinctively wide fore and hind femora in males.

The genus Torymus Dalman (Hymenoptera: Torymidae) currently contains 393 described species that are distributed worldwide (Noyes 2018), of which 18 have been recorded for Mexico (Cameron 1904; Gahan 1936; Breland 1939; Grissell 1976, 1979; De Santis 1979). The vast majority of Torymus species are known to be ectoparasitoids of dipterans or gall former hymenopterans (Moser 1956; Grissell 1976), though few species are seed predators, inquilines, or gall inducers (Grissell 1995; La Salle 2005; Matsuo & Yakawa 2009). Other records of Torymus include species that have been reared from eggs of Cicadidae and larvae of Coleoptera, Lepidoptera, and Coccidae (Nikolskaya 1952; Herting 1973; Pérez & Bonet 1985; De Santis 1989; Kazmi & Chauhan 2003).

Even though many species in the genus Torymus are Holarctic, the biology, ecology, and especially their phylogeny is far from being fully resolved, because this is one of the largest and most complex genera of its family (Grissell 1995; de Vere & Gijswijt 1998). Huber (1927) divided Torymus into 2 groups based on a slightly petiolate versus a sessile stigmal vein. About 50 years later, Grissell (1976) provided additional characters and divided the genus into 5 species groups: bedeguaris, fullawayi, advenus, varians, and tubicula, based on the presence or absence of frenum on the scutellum, scutum sculpture, hind femur denticulation, and stigmal vein petiolate or sessile.

We recently reared various specimens assigned to Torymus from different localities in Mexico (Fig. 1). Based on examination of the morphological features of these specimens and on the available literature, we found that some of them actually represent an undescribed species. Here we describe this new species and provide information about its host records.

Material and Methods

Parasitoid specimens associated to Bruchinae were reared from seeds of Phaseolus vulgaris L. and Phaseolus lunatus L. All parasitoids that emerged were collected, sacrificed, and mounted on a card-point. Torymids were identified following Grissell (1976, 1995). Digital photographs of the diagnostic features present in the new species were taken with a Zeiss® microscope and a digital AxioCam MRc5 camera (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Jena, Germany). Table 1 shows the number of examined specimens assigned to the new species together with their localities. Type material is deposited in the Colección Nacional de Insectos, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, México.

Fig. 1.

Regional distribution of Torymus moazopi n. sp. in Mexico.

img-AJEs_713.jpg

Results

  • Torymus moazopi Pérez-Benavides, sp. nov. (Figs. 2 & 3).

  • Length 2.3 mm, ovipositor 2.7 mm; thorax color mainly dark metallic blue with coppery luster; frenal groove indicated laterally, hind femur with a distinct denticle; males with distinctively wide fore and hind femora.

  • FEMALE (Fig. 2): Body metallic blue with a coppery luster in dorsal view (Fig. 2a, d); antennae brown, pedicel dark with metallic blue luster, scape yellow (Fig. 2b, c). Legs metallic blue except yellow femur tips; fore, mid, and hind tibiae yellow, sometimes hind tibia dark brown medially; tarsi pale yellow, except fifth tarsal segments brown (Fig. 2a, f). Tegulae testaceous. Wings hyaline, venation testaceous (Fig. 2g). Length of body + ovipositor: 2.3 + 2.7 mm.

  • Head in frontal view 1.2× as wide as high, with engraved reticulation (Fig. 2b); eyes separated almost by their own length; distance between eyes 2× frontal width of the eye; temple 0.35× length of the eye; ocellar diameter 0.9× ocular ocellar line. Posterior ocellar line 3.2× ocular ocellar line. Distance between lateral ocellus and occipital carina 1.1× ocular ocellar line. Vertex in dorsal view almost 1.1× as wide as mesoscutum; mouth, 1.7× malar space. Frons shallowly reticulate to reticulate-imbricate (Fig. 2b); vertex, alutaceous to alutaceous-im-bricate; scrobal depression extensively coriaceous to reticulate; lower face with conspicuous white lanceolate setae (Fig. 2b); antenna with toruli distinctly above lower eye line; scape reaching above anterior ocellus; pedicellus plus flagellum about 1.3× breadth of head, flagellum proximally stouter than pedicellus, almost filiform; pedicellus 1.4× as long as broad; anellus 2.5× as broad as long; Fl–2 1.1× longer than wide; F3–F7 wider than long; clava 1.5× as long as broad; sensilla dense, in 2 rows (Fig. 2c).

  • Mesosoma slightly bulged in profile, propodeum declined (Fig. 2a), distinctly visible from above; thoracic dorsum entirely evenly reticulate, midlobe of scutum equal to length of sidelobe; frenum not delimited, distinguished by a difference in sculpture; frenal groove absent medially, indicated slightly laterally; lanceolate setae on anterior scutellum, notauli distinct as fine grooves (Fig. 2d). Mesepimeron broad and almost 2× higher than broad; propodeum sloping sharply and overhung by scutellum, with very weakly alutaceous-reticulate sculpture (Fig. 2e); forewing upper surface of costal and admarginal cell bare, speculum open broad, basal vein without setae, triradiating setal rows distinct (Fig. 2g); hind leg with hind coxae stouter, dorsal surface bare in basal half, often with a longitudinal curved carina; hind femur is 3.5× as long as broad and with a distinct denticle beneath (Fig. 2f); hind tibia with 2 apical spurs, the longer spur slightly longer than breadth of tibia and 0.43× as long as first segment of tarsus (Fig. 2f); the shorter spur 0.74× length of second spur.

  • Metasoma dorsally flattened, terga I and II incised, tergum III with a small incision and tergum IV slightly incised about 1/4 or less visible length of tergum (Fig. 2h); ovipositor 2.3× length of the abdomen (Fig. 2a).

  • MALE (Fig. 3): Similar to female (Fig. 2a) except antenna with flagellum proximally distinctly stouter than pedicellus (Fig. 3b); pedicellus 1.12× as long as broad; anellus 2× as broad as long; sensilla dense, in 1 row; fore and hind femur distinctly enlarged.

  • ETYMOLOGY: The name moazopi is a combination of the first letter of each of the localities where the specimens were collected.

  • REMARKS: Torymus moazopi can be placed in the tubicula group by the following features: sessile (sometimes subsessile) stigmal vein, wing relatively sparsely setose, hind coxa dorsally glabrous, and frenal groove distinct at least laterally. Within the tubicula group, T. moazopi is morphologically closer to T. atheatus Grissell; however, T. moazopi can be distinguished from the latter species by the long ovipositor which is 2.7 mm (1.1 mm in T. atheatus), and thorax color which is mainly dark metallic blue with coppery hues (dark metallic green in T. atheatus). Also, males of the new species can be distinguished from those of T. atheatus by their distinctively wide fore and hind femora.

  • TYPE MATERIAL

  • HOLOTYPE – Female, México, Guerrero, México 200, Cuquita Massieu, Tres Palos, Gro., México, 16.774615°N, 99.622191°W; 59 masl, 7 Feb 2015, D. Schneider CNIN 3865, ex Acanthoscelides obtectus (Say), Acanthoscelides obvelatus Bridwell, Zabrotes spp. on Phaseolus vulgaris L. ALLOTYPE – Male, México, Estado de México Toluca, Cd Altamirano 29, Temascaltepec de González, 19.034728°N, 100.042148°W; 1,969 masl, 1 Mar 2014, D. Schneider CNIN 3785 ex Acanthoscelides obtectus (Say), Acanthoscelides obvelatus Bridwell, Zabrotes spp. on Phaseolus vulgaris L. PARATYPES – 3 males, México, Morelos, Rio el Zopilote, Santa Mónica, 18.952918°N, 99.504810°W; 1,834 masl, 9 Mar 2014, D. Schneider, CNIN 3806, 3807, 3808 ex Acanthoscelides obtectus (Say), Acanthoscelides obvelatus Bridwell, Zabrotes spp. on Phaseolus vulgaris L.; 3 females, México, Estado de México, Carretera Mex 7, 18.860715°N, 99.777943°W; 1,888 masl, 17 Jan 2014, D. Schneider CNIN 3859, 3860, 3861 ex Acanthoscelides obtectus (Say), Acanthoscelides obvelatus Bridwell, Zabrotes spp. on Phaseolus vulgaris L.; 2 females, México, Estado de México, San Simón de Guerrero, 19.027113°N, 99.991257°W; 2,121 masl, 11 Jan 2015, D. Schneider CNIN 3809, 3810 ex Acanthoscelides obtectus (Say), Acanthoscelides obvelatus Bridwell, Zabrotes spp. on Phaseolus vulgaris L.; 1 female, 1 male, México, Oaxaca, Aguaje del Zapote, San Pedro Mixtepec, 15.922161°N; 97.152206°W; 17 masl, 12 Dec 2016, D. Schneider CNIN 3857, 3858 ex Acanthoscelides obtectus (Say), Acanthoscelides obvelatus Bridwell, Zabrotes spp. on Phaseolus vulgaris L.; 2 males, México, Estado de México Toluca, Cd Altamirano 29, Temascaltepec de González, 19.034728°N, 100.042148°W; 1,969 masl, 1 Mar 2014, D. Schneider CNIN 3794, 3784 ex Acanthoscelides obtectus (Say), Acanthoscelides obvelatus Bridwell, Zabrotes spp. on Phaseolus vulgaris L.; 2 females, México, Estado de México, El Fresno, Temascaltepec de González, 19.057581°N, 100.051709°W; 1,817 masl, 1 Mar 2014, D. Schneider CNIN 3891, 3892 ex Acanthoscelides obtectus (Say), Acanthoscelides obvelatus Bridwell, Zabrotes spp. on Phaseolus vulgaris L.; 2 females, 1 male, México, Guerrero, México 200, Cuquita Massieu, Tres Palos, Gro., México, 16.774615°N, 99.622191°W; 59 masl, 7 Feb 2015, D. Schneider CNIN 3866, 3867 ex Acanthoscelides obtectus (Say), Acanthoscelides obvelatus Bridwell, Zabrotes spp. on Phaseolus vulgaris L.

  • BIOLOGY – Among the specimens of T. moazopi n. sp., other parasitoids belonging to different taxa emerged. We assume that they also are primary parasitoids of Bruchinae because no other host species emerged from the seeds. All taxa collected from Phaseolus at different sampling sites are presented in Table 1.

  • Table 1.

    Sampling sites and biological information associated with Torymus moazapi n. sp. (Hymenoptera: Torymidae).

    img-AVEP_713.gif

    Fig. 2.

    Torymus moazopi sp. nov. (Holotype) (Female): (a) lateral habitus; (b) head, frontal view; (c) antenna, frontal view; (d) scutellum, dorsal view; (e) propodeum, dorsal view (Paratype); (f) leg, hindleg (Paratype); (g) fore wing, lateral view; (h) abdomen, dorsal view (Paratype).

    img-z3-3_713.jpg

    Fig. 3.

    Torymus moazopi sp. nov. (Allotype) (Male): (a) lateral habitus; (b) head, frontal view.

    img-z3-8_713.jpg

    Acknowledgments

    The first author thanks CONACYT (Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, scholarship number 620504) for the support of her Master studies in Agricultural Sciences at Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Mexico. Thanks also to Kevin Gómez-Castañeda for photo editing images and Susana Guzmán (IB UNAM) for her help taking the digital photos of the holotype specimen. This work was funded in part by a grant given by the DGAPA UNAM (convocatoria PAPIIT 2016, grant. No. IN207016) to AZR.

    References Cited

    1.

    Breland OP. 1939. New Mexican Callimomidae (Chalcidoidea). Bulletin of the Brooklyn Entomological Society 34: 81–91. Google Scholar

    2.

    Cameron P. 1904. New Hymenoptera, mostly from Nicaragua. Invertebrata Pacifica 1: 46–69. Google Scholar

    3.

    de Santis L. 1979. Catálogo de los himenópteros calcidoideos de América al sur de los Estados Unidos. Publicación Especial Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas Provincia de Buenos Aires, Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas, La Plata, Argentina. Google Scholar

    4.

    de Santis L. 1989. Catálogo de los himenópteros calcidoideos (Hymenoptera) al sur de los Estados Unidos, segundo suplemento. Catalogue of the Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera) of America south of the United States, second supplement. Acta Entomológica Chilena 15: 9–89. Google Scholar

    5.

    de Vere MWR, Gijswijt MJ. 1998. Revision of the European species of Torymus Dalman (s. lat.) (Hymenoptera: Torymidae). Zoologische Verhandelingen Leiden 317: 1–202. Google Scholar

    6.

    Gahan AB. 1936. Four new species of Chalcidoidea parasitic on cactus insects. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 83: 481–486. Google Scholar

    7.

    Grissell EE. 1976. A Revision of Western Nearctic Species of Torymus Dalman (Hymenoptera: Torymidae). University of California Publications in Entomology, Davis, California, USA. Google Scholar

    8.

    Grissell EE. 1979. Family Torymidae. Catalog of Hymenoptera in America North of Mexico, pp. 748–768. In Krombein KV, Hurd PD, Smith DR, Burks BD [eds.], Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, USA. Google Scholar

    9.

    Grissell EE. 1995. Toryminae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea: Torymidae): a redefinition, generic classification and annotated world catalogue of species. Memoirs on Entomology, International. Associated Publishers, Gainesville, Florida, USA. Google Scholar

    10.

    Herting B. 1973. Coleoptera to Strepsiptera. A Catalogue of Parasites and Predators of Terrestrial Arthropods. Section A. Host or Prey/Enemy. Institute of Biological Control, Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough, United Kingdom. Google Scholar

    11.

    Huber LL. 1927. A taxonomic and ecological review of the North American chalcid-flies of the genus Callimome. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 70: 1–114. Google Scholar

    12.

    Kazmi SI, Chauhan N. 2003. Chalcidoid parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) of Hypsipyla robusta (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), a pest of cedars and mahogany. Oriental Insects 37: 261–275. Google Scholar

    13.

    La Salle J. 2005. Biology of gall inducers and evolution of gall induction in Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae, Eurytomidae, Pteromalidae, Tanaostigmatidae, Torymidae, pp. 507–537 In Raman A, Schaefer CW, Withers TM [eds.], Biology, Ecology, and Evolution of Gall-Inducing Arthropods. Science Publishers, Inc., Enfield, New Hampshire, USA. Google Scholar

    14.

    Matsuo K, Yukawa J. 2009. Two new species of Torymus Dalman, 1820 (Hymenoptera: Torymidae) parasitizing Celticecis japonica Yukawa and Tsuda, 1987 (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) that induce leaf galls on Celtis species (Ulmaceae) in Japan. Entomological Sciences 12: 261–269. Google Scholar

    15.

    Moser JC. 1956. A new species of Torymus (Hymenoptera: Torymidae) parasitic on Pachypsylla celtidis-vesicula Riley (Chermidae) with notes on its biology and other parasitoids attacking the same host at Columbus, Ohio. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 29: 57–62. Google Scholar

    16.

    Nikolskaya MN. 1952. The chalcid fauna of the USSR. Opredelitelipo Faune SSSR 44, Moscow and Leningrad, Zoologicheskim Institutom Akademii Nauk SSSR, Moscow, Russia. Google Scholar

    17.

    Noyes JS. 2018. Universal Chalcidoidea Database.  http://www.nhm.ac.uk/chalcidoids (last accessed 19 May 2019). Google Scholar

    18.

    Peréz G, Bonet A. 1985. Hymenopterous parasites of Acanthoscelides obtectus (Say) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) in Tepoztlan, Morelos. Folia Entomológica Mexicana 59: 71–78. Google Scholar
    A. Lucía Pérez-Benavides, Fernando Hernández-Baz, Jorge M. González, and Alejandro Zaldívar Riverón "A New Species of Torymus (Hymenoptera: Torymidae) Associated with Two Genera of Bruchinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in México," Florida Entomologist 102(4), 713-716, (23 January 2020). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.102.0407
    Published: 23 January 2020
    KEYWORDS
    BIOLOGY
    Mexico
    new species
    parasitoid
    taxonomy
    Back to Top