Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
29 September 2020 Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in a Temperate Ecosystem from La Malinche National Park, Mexico
Mariana Cuautle, Citlalli Castillo-Guevara, Brenda Juárez-Juárez, Gibran Pérez-Toledo
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The formicofauna of temperate Mexican ecosystems have been studied poorly. The objective of this study was to document the number of ant species in the protected natural area of La Malinche National Park, which features a temperate ecosystem in central Mexico. Furthermore, this study serves to update the list of species for Tlaxcala State in this area of the country. During 2015 to 2016, samples were collected along six 400 m linear transects in oak forest and agricultural land (2,700, 2,800, and 2,900 masl), using pitfall traps, baits with either protein or sugar, and hand collection from plants (where ants were foraging for floral nectar, extrafloral nectar, or honeydew). Twenty-three ant species belonging to 14 genera, 11 tribes, and 4 subfamilies were collected in La Malinche National Park. One genus (Brachymyrmex Mayr [Hymenoptera: Formicidae]), 7 species in the park, and 5 species in Tlaxcala State were new collection records. In pitfall traps, 23 species were recorded, where Dorymyrmex insanus Buckley, Formica densiventris Viereck, Lasius mexicanus Wheeler, and Brachymyrmex musculus Forel (all Hymenoptera: Formicidae) were collected exclusively from agricultural land. Temnothorax brevispinosus MacKay and Stenamma huachucanum Smith (both Hymenoptera: Formicidae) were collected exclusively in the oak forest, whereas 17 species were recovered from both habitats. Nine species were recorded from either protein or sugar baits; Formica propatula Francoeur and Temnothorax texanus Wheeler (both Hymenoptera: Formicidae) were recorded only in tuna baits, and with the remainder of the species collected with tuna and honey. Seven ant species were recorded from hand collections on plants. We have increased the number of ant species in Tlaxcala State from 53 to 58 (28 of which are present in La Malinche National Park). This faunal survey demonstrated that there is a great diversity of ant species in this temperate ecosystem. It is urgent to document the diversity of formicofauna in these types of ecosystems because they may possibly be the first to be negatively affected by climate change.

Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) are a very diverse and widely distributed group of organisms, being absent only from Greenland, Iceland, and Antarctica (Keller & Gordon 2009). Ecologically, they play an important role as ecosystem engineers because they are important in nutrient cycling, bioturbation, and pedogenesis (Arcila & Lozano-Zambrano 2003). In addition, ants interact in a variety of ways with other organisms in antagonistic or mutualistic manners. Antagonistically, they can function as plant herbivores. For example, in the case of leaf cutters, ants of the tribe Attini (Formicidae: Myrmicinae) harvest leaves not for their own consumption but as substrates to grow the fungus on which they feed. Leaf cutters are the primary consumers in terrestrial ecosystems in the New World, and their impact on vegetation is greater than any herbivore taxa (Beattie & Hughes 2009). This group can act as mutualists where they grow and feed on the fungus they are producing; although they consume part of the mycelium, the fungus relies exclusively on the ants for propagation and reproduction (Vásquez-Bolaños & Quiroz-Rocha 2013). Also, ants that defend plants against herbivores in exchange for the nectar that the plants produce from extrafloral nectaries can be considered mutualists (Beattie & Hughes 2009). Furthermore, those ants that act as seed dispersants are similarly regarded as mutualists (Rico-Gray & Oliveira 2007; Salazar-Rojas et al. 2012). For all of these reasons ants can be used as bioindicators (Arcila & Lozano-Zambrano 2003). Approximately 13,000 species of ants occur worldwide (Vázquez-Bolaños 2015). For Mexico, the most recent taxonomic review indicates that there are 927 present in the country belonging to 93 genera and 11 subfamilies, with the Myrmicinae subfamily being the most represented with 51.5% of the species (Vázquez-Bolaños 2015).

However, there are still knowledge gaps regarding the taxonomy of ants in Mexico. These knowledge gaps occur because identification to the species level often is difficult and complex; additionally the number of taxonomic specialists is lacking (Vázquez-Bolaños 2015). Generally, there appears to be a geographic bias in the sampling of this group of insects. Ants have been more studied in the tropics than temperate or arid areas of Mexico (Hinojosa Ontiveros et al. 2015). This is partly because, like other groups of organisms, ant diversity follows a latitudinal and altitudinal pattern, with most ant species occurring at lower forest elevations and tropical latitudes (Ward 2000). Studies in temperate ecosystems have shown differential composition in ant functionality when compared with tropical ecosystems. For example, cold climate specialists are an important component of temperate ecosystems (Andersen 1997, 2000; Cuautle et al. 2016) followed by Myrmicine generalists in low land tropics (Andersen 2000). Whereas tropical climate specialists are dominated by Dolichoderinae in arboreal tropical rainforests, Myrmicinae generalists and subordinate Camponotini are important dominant elements as well (Andersen 2000). It has been reported that cold climate specialists could be the first ant group negatively affected by climate change because they are associated with low temperature environments (Ellison 2012). Because of this, knowledge of ant communities in temperate ecosystems has become vitally important because changes in its abundance or richness could be the first warning of the effect of global warming, and changes in the way we manage natural resources should be implemented.

Rojas (2001) reported that Tlaxcala, Querétaro, Aguascalientes, and the state of Mexico were areas with the least ant diversity; however, it is believed that this is merely the result of having been poorly studied. Velasco Corona et al. (2007) recorded Liometopum apiculatum Mayr (Formicidae: Dolichoderinae) from Tlaxcala while Vásquez-Bolaños (2011) reported Formica retecta Francoeur (Formicidae: Formicinae) and Pogonomyrmex barbatus Smith (Formicidae: Myrmicinae) from the same city. Vásquez-Bolaños & Quiroz-Rocha (2013) reported that 14 states of Mexico, including Tlaxcala, did not have a local myrmecofauna survey. Later, Vásquez-Bolaños (2015) reported 14 species (5 subfamilies, 14 genera) for Tlaxcala State. Eleven of those reported species were state records as a result of the study by Landero-Torres et al. (2014) conducted in the Botanical Garden of Tizatlán, Tlaxcala. In a subsequent study, Landero-Torres et al. (2015) recorded 9 more species from Tlaxcala State (6 municipalities), including Pheidole ceres Wheeler (Formicidae: Formicinae), which was the first ant species reported for the Natural Protected Area, La Malinche National Park. Subsequently, Dubovikoff & Coronado-Blanco (2017) recorded 20 species for Tlaxcala State (7 municipalities) of which 8 species were collected in La Malinche National Park. Later, Castillo-Guevara et al. (2019) reported 4 new species in La Malinche National Park. Finally, Dáttilo et al. (2019) has reported 9 species in La Malinche National Park. As a result of the above studies, 53 species, 23 genera, 16 tribes, and 7 subfamilies were reported for Tlaxcala State. Despite the importance of La Malinche National Park as a protected area in a temperate ecosystem, a formicid fauna survey has been conducted in the area. The objective of this study was to update the fauna list of Formicidae species for the state of Tlaxcala, Mexico, by adding to the species inventory present in La Malinche National Park. The information, reported herein, contributes particularly to the knowledge of formicofauna of Tlaxcala and Mexico, and temperate ecosystems in general.

Materials and Methods

STUDY SITE

The study was conducted at La Malinche National Park, Tlaxcala, Mexico, with a total area of 46,093 ha (19.2333°N, 98.0333°W; 2,300–4,461 masl). Approximately 17,500 ha of the protected area of the park is comprised of coniferous and oak remnant forests surrounded by a landscape of human-induced grasslands, i.e., Festuca tolucensis H.B.K., Muhlenbergia macroura (Kunth), and Stipa ichu (Ruiz & Pav.) Kunth (all Poaceae), that usually is subjected to prescribed burning for thinning of the cultivation areas and secondary succession vegetation. The park is in the Mexican Transition Zone, a biogeographic province that was proposed by Halffter (2008) for insects and other groups. In this transition zone, there are Nearctic and Neotropical biota. Within the Mexican Transition Zone, there are a series of mountains and volcanoes that constitute the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt, in which La Malinche National Park is included. The Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt is characterized as a route of dispersion for northern fauna to the mountains as a result of the many volcanic events present in this area. This situation has resulted in a high rate of change in species composition (i.e., beta diversity) in this area (Moctezuma et al. 2016). Mean annual precipitation is 800 mm; the rainy season is between Jun and Oct, and mean annual temperature is 15 °C (Lara 2006; Villers et al. 2006).

Our study was conducted in 7.68 ha of preserved transitional oak forest located within La Malinche National Park (i.e., Quercus rugosa Née, Quercus crassipes Humb. & Bonpl., Quercus laurina Bonpl., Quercus crassifolia Bonpl., and Quercus dysophylla Benth. [all Fagaceae]) that included hedgerows, rainfed agriculture (i.e., maize crops), and agricultural land used for grazing livestock outside La Malinche National Park, with an elevation range between 2,700 to 2,900 masl. At each elevation range (2,700, 2,800, and 2,900 masl) we established 3 paired 400 m linear transects, spaced at least 500 m apart, that included a transect in an oak forest and agricultural land (i.e., 1 transect pair at each altitudinal step). The separation between paired transects from each elevation range was at least 1.5 km. Ant samples were collected in each of these transects using 3 collection methods: pitfall traps, protein or sugar baits, and hand collection from plants where ants foraged for floral or extrafloral nectar as well as honeydew sources. To avoid interference between sampling methods, collections were performed on different d of the mo.

Pitfall Traps

The pitfall traps consisted of plastic cups (Reyma®, Reyma Group, Ecatepec, Mexico State, Mexico) (10 cm high) that contained 70 mL of propylene glycol. Traps were placed during the dry season (Mar 2015 and Apr 2016) and rainy season (Jul 2015 and Sep 2016). In each transect, 20 traps were placed 20 m apart (20 traps per transect × 6 transects × 2 seasons = 240 traps total). Trap contents were collected 96 h after placement. Captured ants were stored in 70% ethanol and transferred to the laboratory for identification.

Baits

Bait collections were conducted during Apr and Sep 2015. Bait stations were placed every 10 m along the linear transects described earlier. Each sampling point consisted of paired Petri dishes (at < 10 cm apart) with baits as attractants (placed in the center of the Petri dish). Two types of baits were used: 0.5 mL of commercial honey (Carlota®, Herdez, Mexico City, Mexico) diluted with 50% water, and 0.5 g of commercial tuna (Dolores®, Pinza Group, Mexico City, Mexico). For each transect, there were 9 sampling points with 18 Petri dishes. Each mo, 108 Petri dishes were placed (2 vegetation types × 3 transects × 9 sampling points × 2 types of bait), for a total of 648 Petri dishes. Baits were placed ad libitum in the center of each Petri dish. Weather permitting, Petri dishes were placed in the first pair of transects at 9:00 AM, the second pair of transects at 11:00 AM, and in the third at pair at 1:00 PM, and remained in place for 4 h each. The order of placement of Petri dishes in transects was alternated each mo. Ants from collections were stored in 70% ethanol and transferred to the laboratory for identification.

Hand Collection from Plants

For each transect, hand collection of ants from plants was conducted every mo from Jun 2015 to Jul 2016 on d with mild weather conditions. Walking counts were performed from 8:00 AM to 1:00 PM beginning from a different transect and different vegetation type each time to avoid sample location bias. Observers recorded individual ants showing some type of interaction with any plant at a parallel distance no more than 10 m from the center line of the transect. Each observed specimen was collected with an entomological aspirator or forceps and preserved individually in capped 1.5 mL Eppendorf® Safe-Lock™ Axygen® microcentrifuge tubes (Corning Inc., Corning, New York, USA) containing 70% alcohol.

Ants were identified using the taxonomic keys of Mackay & Mackay (1989) following the classification proposed by Vásquez-Bolaños (2019). Identification also was aided by myrmecology specialists from the Entomology Laboratory of the Institute of Ecology AC (J. E. Valenzuela-González), University of Quebec, in Chicoutimi; the Department of Fundamental Sciences (A. Francoeur); and the University Autonoma of Guadalajara (M. Vásquez-Bolaños). A reference collection of ants collected in the study was created and later integrated into the Entomological Collection (Formicidae) of the Institute of Ecology AC, Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico (IEXA; Reg. SEMARNAT: Ver. IN.048.0198), and the Entomology Laboratory of the University of Las Americas Puebla, San Andrés Cholula, Puebla, Mexico.

Results

In La Malinche National Park, a total of 11,064 ants were collected that included workers, soldiers, and queens from pitfall traps; 3,498 ants collected from protein or sugar baits, and 1,053 ants collected from plants. Twenty-three ant species belonging to 14 genera, 11 tribes, and 4 subfamilies were recorded (Table 1). One genera (Brachymyrmex), 7 species (in La Malinche National Park: Dorymyrmex insanus [Buckley], Camponotus pudorosus Emery, Formica pacifica Francoeur, Formica propatula [Francoeur], Lasius mexicanus Wheeler, Brachymyrmex musculus Forel, and Crematogaster lineolata [Say] [all Hymenoptera: Formicidae]) (Table 1) and 5 species (in Tlaxcala: D. insanus, F. pacifica, L. mexicanus, B. musculus, and C. lineolata) (Table 2) were new records. Formicinae and Myrmicinae were the subfamilies most represented with 11 and 10 species, respectively, while Dorylinae and Dolichoderinae were represented by only 1 species each. According to the sampling method used, all species were recorded in pitfall traps, 9 species were collected on baits, and 7 species were hand collected from plants.

All species were present in both environments in pitfall traps, except for D. insanus, Formica densiventris Viereck (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), L. mexicanus, and B. musculus, which were recorded only from agricultural land, while Temnothorax brevispinosus Mackay and Stenamma huachucanum Smith (both Hymenoptera: Formicidae) were recorded only in oak forest (Table 1). Formica propatula and Temnothorax texanus Wheeler (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) were collected from the tuna bait, whereas 6 species were recorded from both types of baits, with only 3 unidentified Camponotus specimens collected exclusively with honey (Table 1).

We found representatives of the following functional groups (based on the criteria of Andersen 2000): cold-climate specialists (Lasius latipes Walsh, L. mexicanus, Lasius niger (L.), T. brevispinosus, Temnothorax punctithorax Mackay, T. texanus, and S. huachucanum), opportunists (D. insanus, F. densiventris, F. pacifica, F. propatula, F. retecta, and Myrmica mexicana Wheeler), generalized Myrmicinae (Pheidole chalca Wheeler, Pheidole soritis Wheeler, C. lineolata, and Monomorium minimum [Buckley]), tropical climate specialists (Neivamyrmex pilosus Smith, B. musculus, and Solenopsis picea Emery), subordinate Camponotini (Camponotus picipes pilosulus Emery and Camponotus pudorosus Emery), and hot-climate specialists (Myrmecocystus melanoticus Wheeler) (all Hymenoptera: Formicidae).

Discussion

Tlaxcala is a small state in central Mexico (4,016 m2), and ant collections have been carried out in only 12 of the 60 municipalities that comprise it: Tlaxco, Tizatlán, Huamantla, Nanacamilpa, Tepetitla, Tlaxcala, Xaloztoc, Zacatelco, Tzompantepec, Teacalco, Apizaco, and Tetlanohcan. Of the representative vegetation types present in Tlaxcala, the oak forest and agricultural land ants had not been sampled until recent studies by Castillo-Guevara et al. (2019) and Dáttilo et al. (2019) in the La Malinche National Park. Prior to these studies, Landero-Torres et al. (2015) reported on the first ant species on record (P. ceres) in La Malinche National Park, but recorded from pine and oyamel forest at 3,086 masl. Later, Dubovikoff & Coronado-Blanco (2017) recorded 20 ant species for Tlaxcala State, of which 8 species were collected in La Malinche National Park (Formica browni Francoeur, F. densiventris, Formica moki Wheeler, F. retecta, Pheidole calens Forel, T. brevispinosus, T. punctithorax, and Stenamma ignotum Branstetter) (all Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Recently Castillo-Guevara et al. (2019) reported 4 species from La Malinche National Park, where C. p. pilosulus and M. minimum were new records. Formica retecta and M. mexicana were reported previously by Dubovikoff & Coronado-Blanco (2017), but from outside La Malinche National Park. More recently, Dáttilo et al. (2019) reported 9 species for La Malinche National Park: P. soritis Wheeler, P. chalca Wheeler, M. melanoticus, L. niger, L. latipes Walsh, S. picea, Neivamyrmex pilosus Smith, T. texanus, and S. huachucanum (all Hymenoptera: Formicidae).

Table 1.

Inventory of ant species collected in La Malinche National Park in Tlaxcala, Mexico, by 1Vásquez-Bolaños (2011); 2Landero-Torres et al. (2015); 3Vásquez-Bolaños (2015); 4Dubovikoff & Coronado-Blanco (2017); 5Castillo-Guevara et al. (2019); 6Dáttilo et al. (2019). Abbreviations: OF = oak forest, AL = agricultural land, P = pitfall trap, B = bait, HB = honey bait, TB = tuna bait, HCP = hand collection from plants. Mexico distribution ant species (Vásquez-Bolaños 2015). *Camponotus pudorosus and Formica propatula had been reported for Tlaxcala State, but not specifically in La Malinche National Park.

img-z4-2_321.gif

Table 2.

Inventory of ant species in Tlaxcala State, Mexico. Ant species marked with an asterisk (*) were collected in La Malinche National Park during the current study.

img-z5-2_321.gif

(Continued) Inventory of ant species in Tlaxcala State, Mexico. Ant species marked with an asterisk (*) were collected in La Malinche National Park during the current study.

img-z6-2_321.gif

Our study is the first taxonomic faunal survey conducted exclusively at La Malinche National Park using 3 collection methods over a period of 2 yr. This fact makes it the most recent complete study conducted in the area. Ant species recorded in La Malinche National Park and Tlaxcala State belonged to the following functional groups: cold-climate specialists (7 species), opportunists (6 species), generalized Myrmicinae (4 species), tropical climate specialists (3 species), subordinate Camponotini (2 species), and hot-climate specialists (1 species). As expected, cold-climate specialists were the best represented group in this temperate high-altitude ecosystem. Opportunist species were the second functional group in terms of number of species. This is interesting given that this functional group is associated with sites with high levels of disturbance and stress; although some of these species are found only on agricultural land (D. insanus and F. densiventris), the majority were found in both vegetation types. The generalized Myrmicinae, which are associated with warm, open environments, were found in both vegetation types, although numerically they were better represented in agriculture land (Castillo-Guevara et al. 2019). Of the 23 species of ants recorded in our study, 2 cold-climate specialist species were exclusively present in the oak forest, whereas 4 species that were opportunists, cold-climate specialists, and tropical climate specialists were collected exclusively from agricultural land (Table 1). Cold-climate specialists that were found only in the oak forest, such as T. brevispinosus and S. huachucanum, could be used as positive bioindicators for monitoring this protected natural area. The functional groups that were present in both vegetation types were cold-climate specialists, generalized Myrmicinae opportunists (with 4 species in each group), subordinate Camponotini, tropical climate specialists (with 2 species in each group), and hot-climate specialists (with 1 species). Whereas the Formica genus is represented by a great diversity of species, our survey reported only 4 species. We also collected representatives from the Fusca group, which are considered opportunist species (F. densiventris, F. pacifica, F. propatula, F. retecta) from both vegetation types.

Our study updates and lists new records in La Malinche National Park for 7 species belonging to 6 genera. Overall, we recorded 28 ant species of 14 genera, 11 tribes, and 5 subfamilies for the La Malinche National Park (Table 1). It is necessary to carry out systematic sampling in other vegetation types in La Malinche National Park. This work increases the number of known species of Tlaxcala State (Table 2), in addition to the 53 species previously reported by Landero-Torres et al. (2015), Vásquez-Bolaños (2015), Dubovikoff & Coronado-Blanco (2017), Castillo-Guevara et al. (2019), and Dáttilo et al. (2019). Studies on ants in Tlaxcala State have begun only fairly recently. The first report of 1 ant species, Liometopum apiculatum Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) (Velasco Corona et al. 2007), was published in 2007; Vásquez-Bolaños (2011) reported Pogomyrmex barbatus Smith and F. retecta. Later, Landero-Torres et al. (2014) further reported 11 ant species, and Vásquez-Bolaños (2015) recently published 14 ant species. That same yr, Landero-Torres et al. (2015) reported 9 new ant species for Tlaxcala State, and Dubovikoff & Coronado-Blanco (2017) reported 20 new ant species. Castillo-Guevara et al. (2019) reported 2 new species; more recently Dáttilo et al. (2019) reported 8 new ant species in Tlaxcala State. The updated number of species for Tlaxcala State now increases to 58 species, belonging to 24 genera, 16 tribes, and 7 subfamilies.

After the present study, Tlaxcala State now can be compared, with respect to the number of reported ant species, with the states of Durango (60 species) and Puebla (61 species). Ant diversity in Tlaxcala State now is superior to 10 Mexican states: Estado de México (16), Guanajuato (16), Querétaro (17), Distrito Federal (18), Zacatecas (21), Michoacán (36), Campeche (37), Colima (40), Sinaloa (48), and Coahuila (51) (Ríos-Casanova 2014), all of which are far larger in geographical area compared with Tlaxcala State. These data suggest that there is still a large gap to cover with respect to ant diversity in such a megadiverse country as Mexico.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank F. Luna Castellanos, J. Silva Rodríguez, and K.M López Vázquez, for field assistance; the staff of La Malinche National Park for logistic support (non-financial) and for allowing access to their facilities; and an anonymous reviewer who provided useful comments on previous versions of the manuscript. The field research reported here was performed using the required permission (SEMARNAT No. DGVS/06901/15).

References Cited

1.

Andersen AN. 1997. Functional groups and patterns of organization in North American ant communities: a comparison with Australia. Journal of Biogeography 24: 433–460. Google Scholar

2.

Andersen AN. 2000. Global ecology of rainforest ants: functional groups in relation to environmental stress and disturbance, pp. 25–35 In Agosti D, Majer JD, Alonso LE, Schultz TR [eds.], Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Ground Living Ants. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, USA. Google Scholar

3.

Arcila AM, Lozano-Zambrano FH. 2003. Hormigas como herramienta para la bioindicación y el monitoreo, pp. 159–166 In Fernández F [ed.], Introducción a las Hormigas de la Región Neotropical. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá, Colombia. Google Scholar

4.

Beattie AJ, Hughes L. 2009. Ant-plant interactions, pp. 211–247 In Herrera CM, Pellmyr O [eds.], Plant-Animal Interactions: An Evolutionary Approach. Wiley Blackwell, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA. Google Scholar

5.

Castillo-Guevara C, Cuautle M, Lara C, Juárez-Juárez B. 2019. Effect of agricultural land-use change on ant dominance hierarchy and food preferences in a temperate oak forest. PeerJ 7: e6255. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6255 Google Scholar

6.

Cuautle M, Vergara CH, Badano EI. 2016. Comparison of ant community diversity and functional group associated to land use change in a seasonally dry oak forest. Neotropical Entomology 45: 170–179. Google Scholar

7.

Dáttilo W, Vásquez-Bolaños M, Ahuatzin DA, Antoniazzi R, Chávez-González E, Corro E, Luna P, Guevara R, Villalobos F, Madrigal-Chavero R, Falcão JC de F, Bonilla-Ramírez A, García Romero AR, Mora A de la, Ramírez-Hernández A, Escalante-Jiménez AL, Martínez-Falcón AP, Villarreal AI, Colón Sandoval AG, Aponte B, Juárez-Juárez B, Castillo-Guevara C, Moreno CE, Albor C, Martínez-Tlapa DL, Huber-Sannwald E, Escobar F, Montiel-Reyes FJ, Varela-Hernández F, Castaño-Meneses G, Pérez-Lachaud G, Pérez-Toledo GR, Alcalá-Martínez I, Rivera-Salinas IS, Chairez-Hernández I, Chamorro-Florescano IA, Hernández-Flores J, Martínez Toledo J, Lachaud J-P, Reyes-Muñoz JL, Valenzuela-González JE, Horta-Vega JV, Cruz-Labana JD, Reynoso-Campos JJ, Navarrete-Heredia JL, Rodríguez-Garza JA, Pérez-Domínguez JF, Benítez-Malvido J, Ennis KK, Sáenz L, Díaz-Montiel LA, Tarango-Arámbula LA, Quiroz-Robedo LN, Rosas-Mejía M, Villalvazo-Palacios M, Gómez-Lazaga M, Cuautle M, Aguilar-Méndez MJ, Baena ML, Madora-Astudillo M, Rocha-Ortega M, Pale M, García-Martínez MA, Soto-Cárdenas MA, Correa-Ramírez MM, Janda M, Rojas P, Torres-Ricario R, Jones RW, Coates R, Gómez-Acevedo SL, Ugalde-Lezama S, Philpott SM, Joaqui T, Marques T, Zamora-Gutierrez V, Martínez Mandujano V, Hajian-Forooshani Z, MacGregor-Fors I. 2019. Mexico ants: incidence and abundance along the Nearctic-Neotropical interface. Ecology 101: e02944. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2944 Google Scholar

8.

Dubovikoff D, Coronado-Blanco J. 2017. A checklist of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of the state of Tlaxcala, Mexico. Caucasian Entomological Bulletin 13: 235–241. Google Scholar

9.

Ellison AM. 2012. Out of Oz: opportunities and challenges for using ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) as biological indicators in north-temperate cold biomes. Myrmecological News 17: 105–119. Google Scholar

10.

Halffter G, Llorente-Bousquets J, Morrone JJ. 2008. La perspectiva biogeográfica histórica, pp. 67–86 In Comisión Nacional de la Biodiversidad [eds.], Capital Natural de México vol. I: Conocimiento Actual de la Biodiversidad. Comisión Nacional de la Biodiversidad, Mexico City, Distrito Federal, Mexico. Google Scholar

11.

Hinojosa Ontiveros G, González-Castillo MP, Ramírez Noya D. 2015. Listado de hormigas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) de cuatro municipios del estado de Durango, pp. 89–100 In Castaño-Meneses G, Vásquez-Bolaños M, Navarrete-Heredia JL, Quiroz-Rocha GA, Alcalá-Martínez I [eds.], Avances de Formicidae de México. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico. Google Scholar

12.

Keller L, Gordon E. 2009. The Lives of Ants. Oxford University Press Inc., New York, USA. Google Scholar

13.

Moctezuma V, Rossini M, Zunino M, Halffter G. 2016. A contribution to the knowledge of the mountain entomofauna of Mexico with a description of two new species of Onthophagus Latreille, 1802 (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Scarabaeinae). ZooKeys 572: 23–50. Google Scholar

14.

Landero-Torres I, García-Martínez MA, Galindo-Tovar ME, Leyva-Ovalle OR, Lee-Espinosa HE, Negrín-Ruíz J. 2014. New state-wide records of ants collected in Tizatlán Botanic Garden, Tlaxcala, Tlaxcala, Mexico. Florida Entomologist 97: 1845–1847. Google Scholar

15.

Landero-Torres I, Murgía-González J, Galindo-Tovar ME, Leyva-Ovalle OR, Presa-Parra E, Quiroz-Robledo LN, Valenzuela-González JE, García-Martínez MA. 2015. Nuevos registros de hormigas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) para Tlaxcala, México. Revista Colombiana de Entomología 41: 275–277. Google Scholar

16.

Lara C. 2006. Temporal dynamics of flower use by hummingbirds in a highland temperate forest in Mexico. Ecoscience 13: 23–29. Google Scholar

17.

Mackay WP, Mackay E. 1989. Clave de los géneros de hormigas en México (Hymeoptera: Formicidae), pp. 1–82 In Quiróz LN, Garduño MP [eds.], II Simposio Nacional de Insectos Sociales. Sociedad Mexicana de Entomología, Oaxtepec, Oaxaca, Mexico. Google Scholar

18.

Rico-Gray V, Oliveira PS. 2007. The Ecology and Evolution of Ant-Plant Interactions. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA. Google Scholar

19.

Ríos-Casanova L. 2014. Biodiversidad de hormigas en México. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 85: 392–398. Google Scholar

20.

Rojas P. 2001. Las hormigas del suelo en México: diversidad, distribución e importancia (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Acta Zoológica Mexicana (n.s.) Número especial 1: 189–238. Google Scholar

21.

Salazar-Rojas B, Rico-Gray V, Canto A, Cuautle M. 2012. Seed fate in the myrmecochorous Neotropical plant Turnera ulmifolia L., from plant to germination. Acta Oecologica 4: 1–10. Google Scholar

22.

Vásquez-Bolaños M. 2011. Lista de especies de hormigas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) para México. Dugesiana 18: 95–133. Google Scholar

23.

Vásquez-Bolaños M, Quiroz-Rocha GA. 2013. Introducción, pp. 7–22 In Vásquez-Bolaños M, Castaño-Meneses G, Cisneros-Caballero A, Quiroz-Rocha GA, Navarrete-Heredia JL [eds.], Formicidae de México. Orgánica Editores, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México. Google Scholar

24.

Vásquez-Bolaños M. 2015. Taxonomía de Formicidae (Hymenoptera) para México. Métodos en Ecología y Sistemática 10: 1–53. Google Scholar

25.

Vásquez-Bolaños M. 2019. Hormigas de México. Lista de las especies de hormigas de México.  https://sites.google.com/udg.mx/hormigasdemexico/hormigas-de-m%C3%A9xico/lista-de-hormigas-de-m%C3%A9xico(last accessed 31 May 2020). Google Scholar

26.

Velasco Corona C, Corona-Vargas MC, Peña-Martínez R. 2007. Liometopum apiculatum (Formicidae: Dolichoderinae) y su relación trofobiótica con hemíptera Sternorrhyncha en Tlaxco, Tlaxcala, México. Acta Zoológica Mexicana (n.s.) 23: 31–42. Google Scholar

27.

Villers RL, Rojas GF, Tenorio LP. 2006. Guía Botánica del Parque Nacional Malinche Tlaxcala-Puebla. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Distrito Federal, Mexico. Google Scholar

28.

Ward PS. 2000. Broad-scale patterns of diversity in leaf litter ant communities, pp. 99–121 In Agosti D, Majer JD, Alonso LE, Schultz TR [eds.], Ants: Standard Methods for Measuring and Monitoring Biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, USA. Google Scholar
Mariana Cuautle, Citlalli Castillo-Guevara, Brenda Juárez-Juárez, and Gibran Pérez-Toledo "Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in a Temperate Ecosystem from La Malinche National Park, Mexico," Florida Entomologist 103(3), 321-328, (29 September 2020). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.103.0303
Published: 29 September 2020
KEYWORDS
agricultural land
Formicinae
Myrmicinae
oak forest
Protected Natural Area
Tlaxcala State
Back to Top