Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2007 Ectoparasitism of Damselflies by Water Mites in Central Florida
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Little is known about the frequency of water mite ectoparasitism (Acari: Hydrachnida) within and among damselfly species of Central Florida. Here I present a field survey of the assemblage of damselflies and their water mite parasites at the Archbold Biological Station (Lake Placid, FL) during late Mar, 2006. During this period, 4 species of damselfly were abundant: Ischnura hastata (Say) and Nehalennia gracilis Morse captured only at pond sites; and Argia fumipennis atra Gloyd and Ischnura ramburii (Selys) captured at a lake site. Only pond damselflies had water mites, and 12.2% and 12.5% of I. hastata and N. gracilis were parasitized, respectively. These are 2 novel and unreported odonate-acari associations for this area. I also examined within-species differences in ectoparasitism by sex, body size, and wing-cell fluctuating asymmetry. However, these factors did not relate to the prevalence and intensity of parasitism in the field. My study indicates that brief surveys of odonates in Central Florida will likely generate novel, unreported associations with parasitic water mites—this information is important to address the gap in natural history for southeastern distributions of North American water mites.

Basic information on the natural history of water mite parasitism (Acari: Hydrachnida) within and among odonate species is scarce (Smith 1988), and is urgently needed to assess the host range and geographic distribution of these parasites (Bush et al. 2001; Rolff 2001). Cook (1976) broadly surveyed adult water mites of Florida (mainly Hydrachnida: Arrenurus), and described many new species, adding 35 to the 14 previously described. However, nothing is known on the larval ecology of the mites, which are often parasitic on adult damselflies and dragonflies. Here I report field patterns of larval mite parasitism among the assemblage of damselflies species found in the southernmost region of Lake Wales Ridge, Central Florida.

I also examine whether sex, body size, and fluctuating asymmetry relate to patterns of parasitism in the field. Life-history theory predicts an interaction between the reproductive effort among sexes and susceptibility to parasitism (Poulin 1996; Johnsen & Zuk 1999). This interaction can result in the characteristic male-bias of parasitism found in mammals and dioecious plants (Schalk & Forbes 1997; Moorse & Wilson 2002; Cornelissen & Stiling 2005). However, the direction of this bias (either female or male) is dependent on the group of parasites under study (i.e., for birds there is a female bias in blood parasites, see McCurdy et al. 1998). Among invertebrate hosts, odonates are among the very few to show sex-biases in parasitism (Hecker et al. 2002; Lajeunesse et al. 2004; cf. Sheridan et al. 2002; Kelly 2005); although studies finding no bias are also common (Sheridan et al. 2002). Specifically for damselflies parasitized by water mites, the factors known to mediate sex-biases in parasitism include sex differences in immunity, adult behavior and/or phenology (Yourth et al. 2001; Lajeunesse et al. 2004; Robb & Forbes 2006). Sex-biases in parasitism can also be generated as an effect of body size dimorphism between sexes. Here the larger sex (or larger individual, more generally) may harbor a greater intensity of parasitism (i.e., number of parasites per host) because a larger size may represent a greater resource for more individual parasites (Bush et al. 2001).

In addition to sex and body size, fluctuating asymmetry has also been linked to parasitism for many animals including damselflies (c.f. Bonn et al. 1996). Field variation in ectoparasitism may be associated with damselfly symmetry, should the stressful conditions during larval growth (e.g., competition, predation, and/or parasitism) that influence the symmetric development of wings, also affect the susceptibility to, or recruitment of parasites (Leung & Forbes 1996). However, wing-cell asymmetry of adult damselflies is only a coarse surrogate of physical condition during larval-to-adult emergence and not adult condition (which is difficult to assess for insects). However despite this shortcoming, wing cell asymmetry may explain some variation of field parasitism given that many species of water mite are first phoretic on damselfly larvae and then parasitize hosts shortly after adult emergence (Smith 1988).

Materials And Methods

I surveyed all damselflies (Odonata: Zygoptera) at 3 sites near the Archbold Biological Station (ABS; Lake Placid, FL) for 10 days (18-III-2006 to 30-III-2006). Two of these sites were ephemeral ponds located near ABS, and a third was located on the shore of Lake Annie. These sites have distinct vegetation types (see below), differ in size, but were primarily fields dominated by grasses or shrubby hypericum (Hypericum spp.). The edges of these fields were mostly dominated by palmettos (Serenoa spp.). The vegetation of the field surrounding my larger seasonal pond (ca. 1500 m2; hereafter large pond, N 27°10'50.7”, W 81° 21'10.8”) was mostly hypericum with small patches of redroot (Lachnanthes caroliniana), gallbery (Ilex glabra), fetterbush (Lyonia lucida) and several pine snags (Pinus spp.). The edge habitat surrounding this field had scrubby oak species (Quercus inopia and Q. germinata). The second seasonal pond (ca. 200 m2; N 27°11'14.1”, W 81°21'27.1”) had mostly hypericum plants, and had an edge habitat composed of palmettos and maidencane (Panicum hemitomon), but did not have any pine snags. Finally, the lake site (N 27°12'39.3”, W 81°20'58.7”) had mostly southern ridge saw-hill flora (see description in Abrahamson et al. 1984).

At the two ponds, I sampled damselflies in the morning (ca. 10:30 am) and afternoon (ca. 4:00 pm), and rotated these sampling times daily (from afternoon to morning) to control for differences in activity between damselfly species. My survey at Lake Annie occurred daily at 1:00 pm. During surveys, I collected all possible damselflies with a sweep-net for 1 h. Rigorous sampling for a narrow time-frame can provide information on the relative frequency and abundance of damselfly species at a particular site. Captured damselflies were processed at ABS.

Damselfly species were identified following Westfall and May (1998) and were verified with specimens from the ABS invertebrate museum collected by M.J. Westfall. Individuals were sexed and divided into two age classes: teneral (e.g., newly emerged with soft, translucent wings) or adult (e.g., full coloration and rigid, dull wings). Westfall and May (1996) found an age related color-polymorphism of adult females in I. hastata, with young females having an orange coloration and older females with a darker brown to black coloration. This distinction was used to separate age classes for this species.

Symmetry of damselflies was estimated as the absolute difference in the number of cells (c) between the nodus and ptrostigma on left (L) and right (R) wings. The total asymmetry (a) was the sum of the wing cell asymmetry between fore- and hind-wings (f and h, respectively). Specifically, asymmetry was calculated as follows:

i0015-4040-90-4-643-e01.gif

When a ≠ 0, damselflies were treated as asymmetric in analyses.

Four estimates of body size were measured: (1) wing-length (the distance between the nodus to the pterostigma for the right forewing; ± 0.01 mm Spi 31-44 caliper), (2) femur- and (3) tarsus-length (the first right leg of each individual was immersed in oil and had the femur and tarsus measured with use of a compound microscope at 10×; ± 0.01 mm Olympus BX60F5). When the first right leg was missing, I used the first left leg for measurements. Finally, (4) wet weight was measured for each damselfly immediately following surveys (± 0.0001 g; Mettler Toledo digital scale, model AB104-5). These measures of body size were collapsed into a single size estimate with Principle Component Analyses (PCA; Zar 1984), but were log10(x + 1) transformed prior to PCA analyses.

Water mites are parasitic only during a single stage in their life cycle, but Smith (1988) provides more details on this stage or the stages outlined below. After hatching from eggs, mite larvae are motile, and in many water mite species (i.e., Arrenurus mites) larvae are phoretic on damselfly larvae. When larval damselflies eclose from the water, phoretic mites abandon the exuviae and crawl back onto the newly emerged (teneral) damselfly. At this stage, phoretic mites locate suitable areas on the damselfly to attach and insert their feeding tubes (i.e., ventral side of the thorax or abdomen). Several mite larvae can attach to a single damselfly host, and at this stage they are parasitic and feed on the host. Once engorged, mites drop off their hosts when hosts return to water to reproduce. Finally, these water mites cycle through additional larval stages until they reach adulthood as aquatic predators.

In this study, larval water mites on each damselfly were counted and grouped as either phoretic (i.e., not attached with legs) or attached (e.g., with feeding tube inserted, engorged and without visible legs). Larval mites also were grouped by their attachment-site on the damselfly, either on the ventral side of the thorax or abdomen.

Results

Richness of Species Assemblages and Abundances and Age Classes of Species

The most abundant pond species of damselfly in late Mar was Ischnura hastata, followed by Nehalennia gracilis (Table 1), whereas Argia fumipennis atra Gloyd was more common than Ischnura ramburii (Selys) at the lake site. However, abundance estimates were biased against I. ramburii captures because this species occupied more offshore areas (i.e., among emergent vegetation at the lake's edge) than the field area surveyed (ca. 2-20 m from the lake's edge). Of the 2 ponds, the larger had greater richness and abundance of both damselfly species than compared to the smaller pond--assuming an equal probability of capture at both ponds (Table 1; I. hastata: χ2 = 10.3, df = 1, P = 0.0013; N. gracilis: χ2 = 6.7, df = 1, P = 0.0094). However, only a single teneral of A. fumipennis atra and I. ramburii were captured at the large pond site. These 2 species are more common to permanent sources of water (Westfall and May 1998), and it is unknown whether they had emerged from this site or dispersed from a more permanent site (e.g., Lake Annie).

Damselfly species captured at pond sites differed in number of adult captures: 75% of 16 N. gracilis and 37% of 114 I. hastata were adults (species contrast: χ2 = 8.4, df = [1,128], P = 0.0037). However, the frequency of adult capture did not differ among the smaller and larger ponds for both damselfly species (I. hastata: χ2 = 0.1, df = [1,112], P = 0.76; N. gracilis: χ2 = 0.1, df = [1,14], P = 0.72). For the 2 lake species, 12% of 53 A. fumipennis atra and all I. ramburii were adult (n = 7).

Water Mite Groups

In total, 92 larval mites were found (24 phoretic and 68 attached), and those attached could be divided into 3 groups: orange and spotted thoracic mites (e.g., common on the ventral side of the mesepimeron, metepimeron and tergites 1 and 2), dark-red abdominal mites (e.g., generally on 4th to 7th sternites), and a bright-red mite on the upper posterior of thoracic mespimeron. By far the most abundant were the orange thoracic mites, with 61 attached individuals found on 15 damselflies. There also was over dispersion of thoracic mites, where 49% of attached mite larvae were found on 3 damselfly individuals (Table 1). The other 2 mite groups were uncommon and found only on single individuals: 6 abdominal mites on I. hastata from the small pond and a single bright-red mite on N. gracilis from the large pond.

Based on (a) the coloration of mites, (b) the body sites to which they attached to hosts, (c) that all phoretic mites were found on newly emerged tenerals, and (d) that all mites were found on coenagrionid damselflies, it is likely that these larvae are 2 species of Arrenurus water mite (B.P. Smith, Biol. Dept., Ithaca College, personal communication 2006). Unfortunately, it is impossible to assess the species of these mite larvae without prior knowledge of the adult water mites that occupy this area (this information is unknown for ABS), or without rearing larval mites on hosts until they detach and reach adulthood (Botman et al. 2002). Generally, only adult males are useful for identifying species.

Finally, the single brightly colored mite found on N. gracilis had attached to an atypical region for odonates (see above); suggesting that this mite is likely more often parasitic on a completely different insect order.

Water Mite Parasitism

The majority of mites were found on I. hastata, where 12.2% of individuals had 82 mites (19 phoretic and 63 attached; Table 1). However, despite the overall difference in abundance between I. hastata and N. gracilis, both had similar prevalence (χ2 = 0.1, df = [1, 128], P = 0.98) and intensity of parasitism (Kruskal-Wallis χ2 = 0.05, df = 1, P = 0.81). All phoretic mites were found on newly emerged tenerals: 2 ♀ I. hastata with 2 and 17 phoretic mites, respectively, and 1 ♀ N. gracilis with 5 phoretic mites. These 2 damselfly-mite associations are novel and unreported for Central Florida.

Damselflies from the large or small pond were not more likely to have parasites (χ2 = 0.56, df = [1, 128], P = 0.45), and there was no site-by-species interaction in likelihood of being parasitized (Wald χ2 = 0.01, df = [1, 128], P = 0.93). Thus, parasitism frequency was not dependent on the site from which damselflies emerged in whole, or individually by species (I. hastata: χ2 = 0.3, df = [1,112], P = 0.58; N. gracilis: χ2 = 0.89, df = [1,14], P = 0.34).

I did not find any larval mites on A. fumipennis atra or I. ramburii at my lake site (Table 1). Thus, all following analyses are limited to I. hastata and N. gracilis because these were the only species parasitized by my water mites. I also combine data from the adult and teneral damselflies in all following analyses, because (a) Arrenurus mites are only recruited by damselflies during larval emergence (thus the prevalence and intensity of parasitism does not accumulate among age classes), and (b) the frequency of parasitism among age classes did not differ (I. hastata: χ2 = 0.2, df = [1,112], P = 0.62; N. gracilis: χ2 = 0.67, df = [1,14], P = 0.41).

Sex and Parasitism

Males were as common as females in both species of damselfly: I. hastata had 59 ♀ and 55 ♂ (assuming equal sex ratio: χ2 = 0.14, df = 1, P = 0.17) and N. gracilis had 7 ♀ and 9 ♂ (χ2 = 0.25, df = 1, P = 0.62). However, no one sex was more likely to be parasitized (Fig. 1a; I. hastata had 7 ♀ and 7 ♂ parasitized: χ2 = 0.02, df = 1, P = 0.888; N. gracilis had 1 ♀ and 1 ♂ parasitized: χ2 = 0.04, df = 1, P = 0.85), or have a greater intensity of larval water mites (I. hastata: Kruskal-Wallis χ2 = 1.51, df = 1, P = 0.22). Too few individuals of N. gracilis were parasitized to test whether intensity of water mites differed between sexes.

The large and small pond also did not have different sex ratios of both species (I. hastata: χ2 = 0.45, df = [1,111], P = 0.5; N. gracilis: χ2 = 0.17, df = [1,14], P = 0.68), and did not contribute to frequencies of parasitism among sexes (site-by-sex interaction for I. hastata: Wald χ2 = 0.06, df = 1, P = 0.81; and N. gracilis: Wald χ2 < 0.01, df = 1, P = 0.99).

Body Size and Parasitism

Body size measures (i.e., wing-, femur-, and tarsus-length, and weight) were collapsed into a single estimate of size (hereafter PC1) with PCA, and calculated separately for each species. The PC1 for I. hastata explained 59.3% of the variation among body size traits (eigenvalue = 2.37), and 41% for N. gracilis (eigenvalue = 1.64). Both damselfly species were overall similar in PC1 (t < 0.01, df = 94, P = 1.0), however only I. hastata was sexually dimorphic with females being larger than males (Fig. 1b; I. hastata: t = 9.01, df = 83, P < 0.001; N. gracilis: t = 0.25, df = 9, P = 0.81).

Body size did not relate with prevalence of parasitism in I. hastata (log-likelihood test, χ2 = 0.08, df = 1, P = 0.77), intensity of infection (r2 = 0.07, F = 0.79, df = 10, P = 0.39), or relate to size differences between sexes (e.g., no sex-by-size interaction: Wald χ2 = 0.31, df = 1, P = 0.58). Again, too few parasitized individuals were available to assess whether water mite parasitism related to body size or sex for N. gracilis.

In general, it does not appear that body size related to patterns of parasitism by larval mites. Finally, there were no differences in body sizes among damselflies emerging from the small or large pond (all damselflies: t = 0.74, df = 94, P = 0.74; I. hastata: t = -0.45, df = 83, P = 0.63; N. gracilis: t = 0.56, df = 9, P = 0.59).

Symmetry and Parasitism

Symmetry of damselflies did not relate to frequencies of parasitism observed in the field. Asymmetric damselflies were not more likely to be parasitized than symmetric individuals for all damselflies (χ2 = 3.09, df = [1,129], P = 0.08) or individually by species (I. hastata: χ2 = 1.83, df = [1,111], P = 0.17; N. gracilis: χ2 = 2.52, df = [1,14], P = 0.11). Asymmetric damselflies also did not have a greater intensity of parasitism than symmetric individuals (all damselflies: Kruskal-Wallis χ2 = 2.89, df = 1, P = 0.09; I. hastata: Kruskal-Wallis χ2 = 0.01, df = 1, P = 1.0; N. gracilis: Kruskal-Wallis χ2 = 1.65, df = 1, P = 0.2), and there was no site-by-symmetry interaction in predicting patterns of parasitism (Wald χ2 = 0.01, df = 1, P = 0.94). In addition, there was no variation in symmetry among the damselflies captured at the 2 ponds (χ2 = 1.83, df = [1,111], P = 0.175). Finally, the sexes of each damselfly species were equally symmetric (Fig. 1c; I. hastata: χ2 = 0.02, df = [1,111], P = 0.89; N. gracilis: χ2 = 0.01, df = [1,14], P = 0.95), and there was no relationship between symmetry and body size (I. hastata: Kruskal-Wallis χ2 = 0.21, df = 1, P = 0.65; N. gracilis: Kruskal-Wallis χ2 = 1.2, df = 1, P = 0.27).

Discussion

Patterns of field parasitism have been reported for several odonate-water mite associations in northeastern North America (e.g., Forbes et al. 2002), but very few studies exist for southern North America. My survey found 2 novel host associations for Arrenurus water mites in Central Florida, where 12.2% of I. hastata and 12.5% of N. gracilis damselflies had larval mites. Should my survey have been seasonal, I likely would have found other novel hosts—given that many additional species of damselfly (and dragonfly) emerge at different periods throughout the year (Westfall & May 1996).

Field variation in parasitism by water mites can occur because of differences in host exposure, immunity, phenology, and spatial constraints. However, I could not detect differences in prevalence and intensity of parasitism between the two infected species of damselfly—despite being distantly related and differing significantly in abundance. Nor could I detect the contribution of sex, body size and asymmetry of hosts on observed field patterns in water mite parasitism. At this time of season, it appears that larval water mites are distributed randomly among species and classes (e.g., sex) of damselfly hosts.

These findings corroborate other studies that find no trend in parasitism among sexes for other insects (Sheridan et al. 2002), or more generally, no effect due to body size and asymmetry (Møller & Thornhill 1998; Forbes et al. 2004). However, my ability to detect such patterns, should they have existed, was poor due to the low prevalence of parasitism and overdispersion of mites on few individual hosts—a common problem to field surveys of parasites (Bush et al. 2001). A large number of parasitized individuals, with high representation among various host classes (e.g., sex, symmetry, etc.), would be required to confidently assess whether such mediating effects exist. This is perhaps best achieved through the experimental manipulation of mite inflections (Lajeunesse et al. 2004). However in the field, large sample sizes of parasitized individuals may not be attainable for damselfly species that are not abundant locally, or uncommon at certain times of the season, as seen for N. gracilis damselflies, where few were captured, and even fewer were parasitized.

I also did not find any dead larval mites and was unable to assess whether damselflies had lost mite larvae prior to surveys. Attached dead mites can indicate a successful immune response by damselflies (Yourth et al. 2001). However, a significant portion of the surveyed damselflies were teneral (63% of I. hastata and 25% of N. gracilis) and were perhaps too young to yet resist larval mite parasitism. In addition, there is the possibility that many of the surveyed damselflies had already lost mites before sampling. However, no mite scars were found on any individual (scars are left when mite larvae detach from hosts; Smith 1988), nor were there any large, fully engorged mite larvae found on any host. These observations indicate that the surveyed damselflies could not have lost mite larvae because mites had fully matured and detached from hosts to complete their life cycle (Smith 1988). To avoid these issues, future surveys should examine immunity to mite larvae feeding tubes (Yourth et al. 2001) or conduct a seasonal mark-recapture study to determine mite mortality (Lajeunesse et al. 2004).

Odonate-water mite associations are a model system to test key hypotheses on life-history trade-offs (Mitchell 1967), but the lack of field data on patterns of host use has hampered progress on understanding the ecology and evolution of these mites and their hosts (Bohonak 1999; Rolff 2002; Forbes et al. 2002; Lajeunesse et al. 2004). Additional field surveys, broadly sampling a diversity of habitats, can help address these issues and will likely generate novel, unreported host associations for parasitic water mites.

Acknowledgments

I thank Jed Sparks, Bruce Smith, Richard Root, Peter Marks, Michael Stastny, and Stuart Campbell for helpful discussion on this project, and the Archbold Biological Station for logistic support. The Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at Cornell funded this study as part of a graduate course in Florida field ecology.

References Cited

1.

W. G. Abrahamson, A. E. Johnson, J. N. Layne, and P. A. Peroni . 1984. Vegetation of the Archbold Biological Station, Florida: an example of the southern Lake Wales Ridge. Florida Scientist 47:209–250. Google Scholar

2.

M. Andersson 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. Google Scholar

3.

K. Beirinckx, H. Van Gossum, M. J. Lajeunesse, and M. R. Forbes . 2006. Sex biases in dispersal and philopatry: insights from a meta-analysis based on capture-mark-recapture studies of damselflies. Oikos 113:539–547. Google Scholar

4.

A. J. Bohonak 1999. Effect of insect-mediated dispersal on the genetic structure of postglacial water mite populations. Heredity 82:451–461. Google Scholar

5.

A. Bonn, M. Gasse, J. Rolff, and A. Martens . 1996. Increased fluctuating asymmetry in the damselfly Coenagrion puella is correlated with ectoparasitic water mites: implications for fluctuating asymmetry theory. Oecologia 108:596–598. Google Scholar

6.

G. Botman, L. Coenen, and C. A. Lanciani . 2002. Parasitism of Ischnura posita (Odonata: Coenagrionidae) in Florida by two species of water mites. Florida Entomol 85:279–280. Google Scholar

7.

A. O. Bush, J. C. Fernandez, G. W. Esch, and J. R. Seed . 2001. Parasitism: the diversity and ecology of animal parasites. Cambridge Univ. Press. Google Scholar

8.

D. R. Cook 1976. North American species of the genus Arrenurus, mostly from Florida (Acarina: Arrenuridae). Contrib. American Entomol. Instit 11:1–58. Google Scholar

9.

T. Cornelissen and P. Stiling . 2005. Sex-biased herbivory: a meta-analysis of the effects of gender on plant-herbivore interactions. Oikos 111:488–500. Google Scholar

10.

M. R. Forbes, K. E. Muma, and B. P. Smith . 2002. Diffuse coevolution: constraints on a generalist parasite favor use of a dead-end host. Ecography 25:345–351. Google Scholar

11.

M. R. Forbes, K. E. Muma, and B. P. Smith . 2004. Recapture of male and female dragonflies in relation to parasitism by mites, time of season, wing-length and wing cell asymmetry. Exp. Appl. Entomol 34:79–93. Google Scholar

12.

K. R. Hecker, M. R. Forbes, and N. J. Leonard . 2002. Parasitism of damselflies Enallagma boreale by gregarines: sex biases and relations to adult survivorship. Canadian J. Zool 80:162–168. Google Scholar

13.

E. T. Jaynes 1976. Confidence intervals vs. Bayesian intervals. in W. L. Haper and C. A. Hooker [eds.], Foundations of Probability Theory, Statistical Inference, and Statistical Theories of Science, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht. Google Scholar

14.

T. S. Johnsen and M. Zuk . 1999. Parasites and tradeoffs in the immune response of female red jungle fowl. Oikos 86:487–492. Google Scholar

15.

C. D. Kelly 2005. Sexual selection and infection by ectoparasites in Wellington tree weta, Hemideina crassidens (Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae). Austral Ecology 30:648–654. Google Scholar

16.

M. J. Lajeunesse, M. R. Forbes, and B. P. Smith . 2004. Species and sex biases in ectoparasitism of dragonflies by mites. Oikos 106:501–508. Google Scholar

17.

B. Leung and M. R. Forbes . 1997. Fluctuating asymmetry in relation to indices of quality and fitness in the damselfly Enallagma ebrium (Hagen). Oecologia 110:472–477. Google Scholar

18.

D. G. McCurdy, A. Mullie, D. Shutler, and M. R. Forbes . 1998. Sex-biased parasitism of avian hosts: relations to blood parasite taxon and mating system. Oikos 82:303–312. Google Scholar

19.

R. Mitchell 1967. Host exploitation of two closely related water mites. Evolution 21:59–75. Google Scholar

20.

A. P. Møller and R. Thornhill . 1998. Bilateral symmetry and sexual selection: a meta-analysis. American Nat 151:174–192. Google Scholar

21.

S. L. Moorse and K. Wilson . 2002. Parasites as a cost of sexual selection in natural population of mammals. Sci 297:2015–2018. Google Scholar

22.

R. Poulin 1996. Sexual inequalities in helminth infections: a cost of being male? American Nat 147:287–295. Google Scholar

23.

T. Robb and M. R. Forbes . 2005. Success of ectoparasites: how important is timing of host contact? Biol. Let 1:118–120. Google Scholar

24.

T. Robb and M. R. Forbes . 2006. Sex biases in parasitism of newly emerged damselflies. Ecosci 13:1–4. Google Scholar

25.

J. Rolff 2001. Evolutionary ecology of water mite-insect interactions: a critical appraisal. Arch. Hydrobiol 152:353–368. Google Scholar

26.

G. Schalk and M. R. Forbes . 1997. Male biases in parasitism of mammals: effect of study type, host age, and parasite taxon. Oikos 78:67–74. Google Scholar

27.

L. A D. Sheridan, R. Poulin, D. F. Ward, and M. Zuk . 2002. Sex differences in parasitic infections among arthropod hosts: is there a male bias? Oikos 88:327–334. Google Scholar

28.

I. M. Smith and R. D. Olivier . 1986. Review of parasitic associations of water mites (Acari: Parasitengona: Hydrachnida) with insect hosts. Canadian Entomol 118:407–472. Google Scholar

29.

B. P. Smith 1988. Host-parasite interaction and impact of larval mites on insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol 33:487–507. Google Scholar

30.

M. J. Westfall and M. L. May . 1996. Damselflies of North America. Scientific Publishers, Gainesville, FL. Google Scholar

31.

C. P. Yourth, M. R. Forbes, and B. P. Smith . 2001. On understanding variation in immune expression of the damselflies Lestes spp. Can. J. Zool 79:815–821. Google Scholar

32.

J. H. Zar 1984. Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Google Scholar

Appendices

Fig. 1.

Contrasts between females (f) and males (m) of pond species of damselfly in prevalence of water mite parasitism (a), body size (b) and the frequency of symmetry (c) defined as the ratio of symmetric vs. asymmetric individuals in wing cell number. Females and males are symmetric if 95% CI overlap with 0.5 (dashed bar). Sample sizes are as follows: Ischnura hastata 59♀/55♂ and for Nehalennia gracilis 7♀/9♂. Asymmetric 95% confidence intervals (CI) around proportions (e.g., prevalence and frequency of symmetry) were calculated following Jaynes (1976).

i0015-4040-90-4-643-f01.gif

Table 1.

Frequency of damselfly species and parasitism by water mites of 3 sites near the Archbold Biological Station. Number of damselflies captured (n) and their relative frequency (F) are presented, as well as the prevalence of parasitism (P) with lower (LCI) and upper (UCI) 95% confidence intervals, and median intensity (I) of parasitism with inter-quartile (IQR) and full range (FR). LCI and UCI were calculated following Jaynes' (1976) Bayesian method. This method estimates UCI when prevalence is zero, and indicates the likelihood of capturing parasitized individuals given the capture frequency (e.g., survey sample size).

i0015-4040-90-4-643-t01.gif
Marc J. Lajeunesse "Ectoparasitism of Damselflies by Water Mites in Central Florida," Florida Entomologist 90(4), 643-649, (1 December 2007). https://doi.org/10.1653/0015-4040(2007)90[643:EODBWM]2.0.CO;2
Published: 1 December 2007
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top