Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 March 2009 An Introduced Insect Biological Control Agent Preys on an Introduced Weed Biological Control Agent
Kayla R. Nimmo, Philip W. Tipping
Author Affiliations +

Biotic interference, especially by generalist predators, has been implicated in preventing establishment or limiting the impact of introduced weed biological control agents (Goeden & Louda 1976). Boreioglycaspis melaleucae Moore (Homoptera: Psyllidae) was released into Florida in 2002 as part of a classical biological control program targeting the ecological weed Melaleuca quinquenervia (Cav.) S. T. Blake (‘melaleuca’) and is now established and contributing to the suppression of melaleuca (Tipping et al. 2008). The multicolored Asian lady beetle, Harmonia axyridis (Pallas) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) was introduced numerous times into the U.S. starting in 1916 as a biological control agent of Homoptera (Gordon 1985). Chapin & Brou (1991) first documented established populations in 1988 in Louisiana and Georgia. It appeared in Florida in the early 1990s where it feeds on soft scales, mealybugs, psyllids, whitefly larvae, and the eggs of Coleoptera and Lepidoptere (Michaud 2002).

In 2007, we observed large populations of H. axyridis adults and larvae on melaleuca infested with B. melaleucae in our research plots at the USDA-ARS Invasive Plant Research Laboratory (IPRL) in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida (N 26°05′ W 80° 14′). Although other predacious coccinellids were present including Brachiacantha decora Casey, Coleophora inaequalis (F.), and Olla v-nigrum (Mulsant), H. axyridis is considered a dominant intraguild species and has outcompeted many coccinellid species (Pervez & Omkar 2006). Our objective was to determine if H. axyridis would attack and sustain itself on B. melaleucae under laboratory conditions.

Adult H. axyridis were collected from melaleuca growing at IPRL and provisioned with B. melaleucae nymphs in the laboratory until they oviposited. Individual egg masses were incubated at 27°C until larval emergence. First instars (n = 27) were confined in individual plastic containers (30 mL) with plastic snap lids along with a single melaleuca leaf containing various numbers of small (instars 1–3) and large (instars 4–5) B. melaleucae in situ. This was done in lieu of transferring exact numbers because the nymphs are extremely delicate and easily injured or killed when handled. We strove to find leaves with similar numbers of small and large psyllids whose numbers we increased steadily as the H. axyridis larvae grew. For example, an average of 3 small and 1.6 large nymphs were added daily for first instar H. axyridis while fourth instars received 30.5 small and 14 large nymphs daily. Increases in provisioning were guided by the presence of surviving nymphs, which indicated that prey numbers were not limiting. Moisture was supplied with a moistened dental wick placed in the bottom of the container.

Dead or missing nymphs were tallied every 1–3 d and a fresh leaf with their associated nymphs was added. Missing nymphs were assumed to have been consumed. Larval testing ended when H. axyridis died or pupated. Adult feeding trials were conducted for 7 d in the same manner with 12 adults that eclosed successfully from the larval feeding trials.

Larvae and adults fed readily on B. melaleucae (Table 1). However, the mean (±SE) larval development time was 23.0 ± 0.6 d, which may indicate that the psyllid is not an optimal food source when compared to other prey. For example, H. axyridis completed larval development in 11.2 d when fed fresh eggs of Sitotroga cerealella (Olivier) (Abdel-Salam & Abdel-Baky 2001), 10.5 d when fed Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Lanzoni et al. 2004), and 9.6 d when fed Aphis pisum Harris (Specty et al. 2003).

SUMMARY

Adults and larvae of the generalist predator H. axyridis were found in close association with the melaleuca biological control agent B. melaleucae on melaleuca in the field. Larvae and adults readily accepted the psyllid as prey in laboratory studies with larvae consuming an average total of 309.9 nymphs while adults consumed an average of 31.3 nymphs per day. However, H. axyridis larval development time was more than twice as long as those reported in other studies that used different prey, indicating that the psyllid may be a lower quality prey item for H. axyridis. Field level studies are needed to evaluate any biotic interference by H. axyridis with the biological control activities of B. melaleucae.

Table 1

Mean (±SE) of small and large Boreioglycaspis melaleucae nymphs consumed by larvae and adults of Harmonia axyridis in laboratory tests.

t01_179.gif

REFERENCES CITED

1.

A. H. Abdel-Salam , and N. F. Abdel-Baky 2001. Life table and biological studies of Harmonia axyridis Pallas (Col.: Coccinellidae) reared on the grain moth eggs of Sitotroga cerealella (Olivier) (Lep., Gelechiidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 125: 455–462. Google Scholar

2.

J. D. Chapin , and V. A. Brou 1991. Harmonia axyridis (Pallas), the third species of the genus to be found in the United States (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Proc. Entomol. Soc. Washington 93: 630–635. Google Scholar

3.

R. D. Goeden , and S. M. Louda 1976. Biotic interference with insects imported for weed control. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 21: 325–342. Google Scholar

4.

R. D. Gordon 1985. The Coleoptera (Coccinellidae) of America north of Mexico. J. New York Entomol. Soc. 93: 1–912. Google Scholar

5.

A. Lanzoni , G. Accinelli , G. G. Bazzocchi , and G. Burgio 2004. Biological traits and life table of the exotic Harmonia axyridis compared with Hippodamia variegata and Adalia bipunctata (Col.: Coccinellidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 128: 298–306. Google Scholar

6.

J. P. Michaud 2002. Invasion of the Florida citrus ecosystem by Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera; Coccinellidae) and asymmetric competition with a native species, Cycloneda sanguinea. Environ. Entomol. 31: 827–2002. Google Scholar

7.

A. Pervez , and Omkar . 2006. Ecology and biological control application of multicolored Asian ladybird, Harmonia axyridis: A review. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 16: 111–128. Google Scholar

8.

O. Specty , G. Febvay , S. Grenier , B. Delobel , C. Piotte , J. F. Pageaux , A. Ferran , and J. Guillaud 2003. Nutritional plasticity of the predatory ladybeetle Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae): comparison between natural and substitution prey. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 62: 81–91. Google Scholar

9.

P. W. Tipping , M. R. Martin , P. D. Pratt , T. D. Center , and M. B. Rayamajhi 2008. Suppression of growth and reproduction of an exotic invasive tree by two introduced insects. Biol. Control 44: 235–241. Google Scholar
Kayla R. Nimmo and Philip W. Tipping "An Introduced Insect Biological Control Agent Preys on an Introduced Weed Biological Control Agent," Florida Entomologist 92(1), 179-180, (1 March 2009). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.092.0133
Published: 1 March 2009
Back to Top