Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 June 2011 Tephritoid Flies (Diptera, Tephritoidea) and Their Plant Hosts from the State of Santa Catarina in Southern Brazil
Flávio R. M. Garcia, Allen L. Norrbom
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

A total of 12,540 ripe fruits belonging to 46 species in 25 plant families were sampled from either the trees or the ground in 6 municipalities in the state of Santa Catarina, Brazil between 2002 and 2006 to determine which fruit fly species developed on various host plants. Each fruit was weighed and placed into a plastic flask filled with sterilized sand 7 cm deep, and the opening of the flask was covered with sheer fabric. The flasks were kept under controlled conditions (25 ± 3°C, 70 ± 10% RH and 12h photophase). After 7 d, the pupae were sifted from the sand and transferred to Petri dishes lined with filter paper. Twenty-one species of Tephritoidea were recovered consisting of 13 species of Tephritidae, 6 of Lonchaeidae, and 2 of Ulidiidae. We present new host records for some species of fruit flies.

Approximately 70 species of Tephritidae are considered important pests of fruit production worldwide. The majority of the species of economic importance belong to 5 genera: Anastrepha, Bactrocera, Ceratitis, Dacus, and Rhagoletis (Garcia 2009). The genus Neosilba of the family Lonchaeidae (McAlpine & Steyskal 1982) includes 16 described species (Strikis & Prado 2005), some of which cause severe damage to certain species of fruit crops in the American tropics.

Field surveys of fruit flies (Tephritoidea) and their host plants and parasitoids are essential for understanding the bioecology of the economically important genera and species in this superfamily (Bateman 1972). The creation of the common market, Mercosul, involving Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay and Uruguay, has elevated the importance of such studies because knowledge of these pest species, their hosts and natural enemies is key to containing their destructive effects as trade in fruits between these countries expands. In Brazil, most of the pest tephritids belong to the genus Anastrepha, but host plants are known for only 44% of the species (Zucchi 2007).

Santa Catarina has the most host plant records, 81, for species of Tephritidae among the Brazilian states (Garcia 2011). However, only 46 plant species belonging to 18 families are recorded in the state as hosts for fruit flies in the genus Anastrepha (Nora et al. 2000).

This work reports new information from a survey of fruit fly species and their host plants in the state of Santa Catarina, Brazil.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fruit Sampling

Between 2002 and 2006, a total of 12,540 ripe fruits from 46 plant species belonging to 25 families were sampled. Fruits were picked from the plants, or freshly fallen fruits were gathered from the ground below them. Sampling occurred in 6 municipalities of Santa Catarina, Brazil: Anchieta (26fi01_151.gif 53′S and 53fi01_151.gif 33′W), Chapecó (27fi01_151.gif 06′S and 53fi01_151.gif 16′W), Cunha Porã (26fi01_151.gif 07′S and 53fi01_151.gifW 16′), Palmitos (27fi01_151.gif 06′S and 53fi01_151.gif 16W′), São Carlos (27fi01_151.gif 07′ S and 53fi01_151.gif 00′ W), and Xanxerê (26fi01_151.gif 87′ S and 52fi01_151.gifW′ 40). Each fruit was weighed and placed into a plastic flask containing 7 cm of sterilized sand, and the opening of the flask was covered with sheer fabric. The flasks were kept under controlled conditions (25 ± 3°C, 70 ± 10% RH and 12h photophase). After 7 d, the sand was sifted and the pupae transferred to Petri dishes with filter paper as substrate.

Identification of fruit flies and host plants

Characters of the females, primarily of the aculeus, and body and wing markings, were considered in identifying species of Anastrepha (Zucchi 2000) identified by Garcia and Zucchi. Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) is the only species of Ceratitis in Brazil and was easily recognized by the description by Zucchi (2000). Lonchaeidae were identified by Dr. Pedro Strikis, and other Tephritidae and Notogramma cimiciforme Loew (Ulidiidae) were identified by Norrbom. The host plant species were identified by the botanists Dr. Sérgio Augusto de Loreto Bordignon, Dr. Rosiane Berenice Denardin, and Lúcia Salengue. Some voucher specimens of fruit flies and host plants were deposited at the Zoobotanic Museum of the University of Chapecó.

Data Analysis

The infestation indexes were calculated in 2 ways: (1) by dividing the total number of puparia obtained by the number of fruits in the sample (puparia/fruit); or (2) by dividing the total number of puparia by the total mass (kg) of fruits in the sample (puparia/kg). The host plants of Anastrepha obtained in this work were compared to the lists of hosts assembled by Norrbom (2004) and Zucchi (2007, 2008) with the aim of providing new host records for Brazil.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Twenty-one species of Tephritoidea were recovered: 13 species of Tephritidae, 6 of Lonchaeidae, and 2 of Ulidiidae (= Otitidae) (Table 1). The species, Parastenopa guttata Aczél and P. montana Aczél, are new records of fruit flies for the state of Santa Catarina, and the total number of known species of Tephritidae from the state is now 81 (Garcia 2011). The development of flies from the fruit of yerba maté, Ilex paraguariensis A. St. Hil., is reported for the first time. Two species of the genus Parastenopa, P. guttata and P. montana, were reared. The only Parastenopa species previously known to attack this plant were reared from stems or from leaf galls of the Paraguay tea psyllid, Gyropsylla spegazziniana Lizer & Trelles (Hemiptera, Psyllidae) (Blanchard 1929; psyllid as Metaphalara spegazziniana), although the North American P. limata (Coquillett) breeds in the fruit of several Ilex species (Benjamin 1934; Phillips 1946). Araticum, Annona rugulosa (Schltdl.) H. Rainer (Annonaceae), Inga sellowiana Benth. (Fabaceae), and the iguana hackberry, C. iguanaea (Jacq.) Sarg. (Ulmaceae) are recorded for the first time as host plants of Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann). Rio Grande cherry, Eugenia involucrata DC, is recorded for the first time as a host plant of Anastrepha obliqua (Macquart); and sete-capas, Campomanesia guazumifolia (Cambess.) O. Berg. (Myrtaceae), is recorded as a host plant of Anastrepha sororcula Zucchi. Strawberry guava, P. cattleianum Sabine (Myrtaceae), is recorded for the first time as host plant of both A. obliqua and A. sororcula in Brazil. Previously strawberry guava had been reported as a host of A. obliqua in Guatemala (Eskafi & Cunningham, 1987).

The greatest infestations based on the number of puparia per fruit were found in pumpkin, Cucurbita pepo L. (6.59), followed by pineapple guava, Acca sellowiana (O. Berg) Burret (6.23), and common guava, Psidium guajava L. (6.16). Regarding the parameter puparia/kg, the greatest infestations occurred in strawberry guava, P. cattleianum (422), followed by pineapple guava, P. cattleianum (278), yerba maté, I. paraguariensis A. St. Hil. (260), and wild cherry, P. avium (L.) L. (232). Considering both parameters, pineapple guava, P. cattleianum, was the species most infested by fruit flies.

The highest number of plant hosts was recorded for A. fraterculus (20 plant species from 8 families) (Table 1); predominantly fig, Ficus carica L. (Moraceae) (75.0% of the total of samples collected were infested); guavirova, Campomanesia xanthocarpa O. Berg, (60.7%); guaviju, Myrcianthes pungens (O. Berg) D. Legrand (57.1%); Surinam cherry, Eugenia uniflora L. (55.3%); wild cherry, P. avium (L.) L. (Rosacae) (52.0%); pineapple guava, P. cattleianum (51.7%); common guava, P. cattleianum (51.4%); guava (48.0%), Campomanesia guazumifolia (45.4%) (Myrtaceae); and carambola, Averrhoa carambola L. (Oxalidaceae), (35.3%).

Nine new host plants of A. fraterculus were recorded in Brazil: araticum, A. rugulosa (Annonaceae); Inga sellowiana (Fabaceae); common fig, F. carica (Moraceae); pineapple guava, P. cattleianum (Myrtaceae); jaboticaba, Myrciaria cauliflora (Mart.) O. Berg (Myrtaceae); Campomanesia guazumifolia (Myrtaceae); wild cherry, P. avium (Rosaceae); bergamot orange, Citrus reticulata Blanco (Rutaceae); and iguana hackberry, C. iguanaea (Jacq.) Sarg. (Ulmaceae).

TABLE 1.

PLANTS SAMPLED WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE ORIGIN (O), FRUIT WEIGHT (FW), NUMBER OF FRUITS SAMPLED (N), NUMBER OF PUPAE (P), AVERAGE NUMBER OF PUPAE PER FRUIT (P/N), AND AVERAGE NUMBER OF PUPAE PER KG (P/KG). N = NATIVE AND E = EXOTIC. NUMBER IN PARENTHESES FOLLOWING FLY SPECIES NAMES = NUMBER OF SPECIMENS REARED.

t01a_151.gif

CONTINUED

t01b_151.gif

CONTINUED

t01c_151.gif

Pereskia aculeata Mill., also known as Orapro-nobis or Barbados gooseberry, was found to be a host plant for Anastrepha barbiellinii Lima; and Campomanesia guazumifolia (Myrtaceae) was recorded for the first time as a host plant for both A. obliqua and A. sororcula.

Native plant species served as hosts of 12 fruit fly species from 4 genera of Tephritidae, whereas exotic plant species served as hosts of only 4 species from 2 genera. Ceratitis capitata developed in 9 plant species from 5 families, with the following order of predominance: khaki, Diospyros kaki Thunb. (Ebenaceae) (93.1% of the fruits sampled were infested); medlar, Eriobotrya japonica (Thunb.) Lindl. (Rosaceae) (63.5%); uvaia, Eugenia pyriformis Cambess. (Myrtaceae) (29.2%); and peach, P. persica (L.) Batsch (28.1%). Some fruit fly species occurred exclusively in 1 plant species: Anastrepha barbiellinii in ora-pro-nobis, Pereskia aculeata; Anastrepha grandis (Macquart) only in pumpkin, C. pepo; Rhagoletotrypeta pastranai Aczél only in esporão-de-galo, Celtis iguaneae (Jacq.) Sarg.; Anastrepha dissimilis Stone and A. pseudoparallela (Loew) only in Passiflora edulis Sims; Anastrepha montei Lima only in cassava, Manihot esculenta Crantz; and Parastenopa guttata and P. montana only in yerba maté, I. paraguariensis St. Hil.

Lonchaeid flies were recorded from 22 host plant species from 9 families of which 12 were native and 10 exotic. Araújo & Zucchi (2002) have also described the indiscriminate infestation of native and exotic fruits by Lonchaeidae. Neosilba padroi, a species described recently by Strikis & Lerena (2009), had the highest number of host species (7 native, 15 exotic) belonging to 8 families; the lance fly, Lonchaea sp., had 4 host species (2 native and 2 exotic) in 4 families; Neosilba zadolicha McAlpine & Steyskal had 3 host species (1 native and 2 exotic) in 3 families; and Dasiops sp. occurred only in C. pepo (exotic). Neosilba zadolicha occurred in araticum, A. rugulosa (Annonaceae), araçá, P. cattleianum (Myrtaceae), and peach, P. persica (Rosaceae). Spondias spp. (Anacardiaceae) (Santos et al. 2004) and medlar, Eriobotrya japonica (Strikis & Prado 2009) also may serve as hosts of N. zadolicha.

The Ulidiidae occurred only in 5 exotic species of Rutaceae and Cucurbitaceae; Euxesta sp. occurred only in Cucurbitaceae and N. cimiciforme Loew only in Rutacaeae. Euxesta sp. occurred on 3 plant species, with predominance in chayote, Sechium edule (Jacq.) Sw., (48.9%). N. cimiciforme occurred only in bergamot orange, C. reticulata Blanco, and orange, Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck. This species has a wide geographic range in the New World and is a scavenger recorded from a wide variety of plants (Steyskal 1963). Unlike our results, Uchôa-Fernandes et al. (2003) and Aguiar-Menezes et al. (2004) obtained specimens of N. cimiciforme in passion fruit (Passiflora sp.), with occurrences also in tangerine, C. reticulata, and orange, C. sinensis. Such differences may be due to the interpopulation differences or seasonal availability of host plants in different regions (Selivon 2000).

Pumpkin was infested by 4 species of flies belonging to 3 families. Guava, passion fruit, and peach were infested by 5 species each, and these fruits were found to support infestations only of species of Tephritidae and Lonchaeidae.

Under the conditions in which this research was conducted, we conclude that a wide diversity of fruit-bearing plant species in the state of Santa Catarina was attacked by 22 species of tephritoid flies. The most predominant fly was A. fraterculus, and P. cattleianum was the host species most frequently infested by these flies.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the National Council of Technological and Scientific Development of Brazil (CNPq) for the Scholarship of Research Productivity; Biologist Pedro Strikis from Unicamp for Lonchaeidae identifications; Prof. Dr. Roberto Antonio Zucchi for some species of Tephritidae confirmations, and Professors Dr. Sérgio Bordignon from Unilasalle, and Dra. Rosiane Denardin and Lúcia Verona from Unochapecó, for plant identifications.

REFERENCES CITED

1.

E. Aguiar-Menezes , R. J. Nascimento , and E. B. Menezes 2004. Diversity of fly species (Diptera: Tephritoidea) from Passiflora spp. and their hymenopterous parasitoids in two municipalities of southeastern Brazil. Neotrop. Entomol. 33: 113–116. Google Scholar

2.

E. L. Araújo , and R. A. Zucchi 2002. Hospedeiros e níveis de infestação de Neosilba pendula (Bezzi) (Diptera: Lonchaeidade) na região de Mossoró-Açu, R.N. Arq. Inst. Biol. 69: 91–94. Google Scholar

3.

M. A. Bateman 1972. The ecology of fruit flies. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 17: 493–518. Google Scholar

4.

F. H. Benjamin 1934. Descriptions of some native trypetid flies with notes on their habits. U.S. Dep. Agric. Tech. Bull. 401: 95 p. Google Scholar

5.

E. E. Blanchard 1929. Descriptions of Argentine Diptera. Physis 9: 458–465. Google Scholar

6.

F. M. Eskafi , and R. T. Cunningham 1987. Host plants of fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) of economic importance in Guatemala. Florida Entomol. 70: 116–123. Google Scholar

7.

F. R. M. Garcia 2009. Fruit flies: biological and ecological aspects, pp. 1–35 In R. R. Bandeira [ed.], Current Trends in Fruit Flies Control on Perennial Crops and Research Prospects. Transworld Research Network, Kerala. Google Scholar

8.

F. R. M. Garcia 2011. Santa Catarina, in press In A. Malavasi et al. [eds.], Biologia, monitoramento, controle e distribuição de moscas-das-frutas no Brasil. Holos, Ribeirão Preto. Google Scholar

9.

J. F. McAlpine , and G. C. Steyskal 1982. A revision of Neosilba McAlpine with a key to world genera of Lonchaeidae (Diptera). Canadian Entomol. 114: 105–137. Google Scholar

10.

I. Nora , E. R. Hickel , and H. F. Prando 2000. Santa Catarina, pp. 320–327 In A. Malavasi and R. A. Zucchi [eds.], Mosca-das-frutas de Importância Econômica no Brasil; Conhecimento Básico e Aplicado. Holos, Ribeirão Preto. Google Scholar

11.

A. L. Norrbom 2004. Host plant database for Anastrepha and Toxotrypana (Diptera: Tephritidae: Toxotrypanini). Diptera Data Dissemination Disk (CD-ROM) 2. Google Scholar

12.

V. T. Phillips 1946. The Biology and Identification of Trypetid Larvae (Diptera: Trypetidae). Mem. Amer. Entomol. Soc. 12: [ii] + 161 + xvi p. Google Scholar

13.

W. S Santos , C. A. L. Carvalho , and O. M. Marques 2004. Registro de Neosilba zadolicha McAlpine & Steyskal (Diptera: Lonchaeidae) em umbú-cajá (Anacardiaceae). Neotrop. Entomol. 33: 653–654. Google Scholar

14.

D. Selivon 2000. Relaçães com as plantas hospedeiras, pp.87–91 In A. Malavasi and R. A. Zucchi [eds.], Mosca-das-frutas de Importância Econômica no Brasil; Conhecimento Básico e Aplicado. Holos, Ribeirão Preto. Google Scholar

15.

G. C. Steyskal 1963. The genus Notogramma Loew (Diptera: Acalyptratae, Otitidae). Proc. Entomol. Soc. Washington 65: 195–200. Google Scholar

16.

P. C. Strikis , and A. P. Prado 2005. A new species of genus Neosilba (Diptera: Lonchaeidae). Zootaxa 828: 1–5. Google Scholar

17.

P. C. Strikis , and A. P. Prado 2009. Lonchaeidae associados a frutos de nêspera, Eryobotria japonica (Thunb.) Lindley (Rosaceae), com descrição de uma nova espécie de Neosilba (Diptera: Tephritoidea). Arq. Inst. Biol. 76: 49–54. Google Scholar

18.

P. C. Strikis , and M. L. M. A. Lerena 2009 A new species of Neosilba (Diptera: Lonchaeidae) from Brazil. Iheringia, Série Zool. 99: 273–275. Google Scholar

19.

M. Uchôa-Fernandes , I. Olpveira , R. M. S. Molina , and R. A. Zucchi 2003. Biodiversity of frugivorous flies (Diptera: Tephritoidea) captured in Citrus groves in Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Neotrop. Entomol. 32: 239–246. Google Scholar

20.

R. A. Zucchi 2007. Diversidad, distribución y hospederos del género Anastrepha en Brasil, pp. 77–100 In V. Hernández-Ortiz [ed.], Moscas de la Fruta en Latinoamérica (Diptera: Tephritidae): Diversidad, Biología y Manejo. S y G editores, Pedregal de Santo Domingo. Google Scholar

21.

R. A. Zucchi 2008. Fruit flies in Brazil - Anastrepha species and their hosts plants. Piracicaba, 2008. Acessado em: 20. Nov. 2009. Online. Disponivel em:  www.lef.esalq.usp.br/anastrepha/Google Scholar

22.

R. A. Zucchi 2000. Taxonomia, pp. 13–24 In A. Malavasi and R. A. Zucchi [eds.], Moscas-das-frutas de Importância Econômica no Brasil, Conhecimento Básico e Aplicado. Holos, Ribeirão Preto. Google Scholar
Flávio R. M. Garcia and Allen L. Norrbom "Tephritoid Flies (Diptera, Tephritoidea) and Their Plant Hosts from the State of Santa Catarina in Southern Brazil," Florida Entomologist 94(2), 151-157, (1 June 2011). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.094.0205
Published: 1 June 2011
KEYWORDS
fruit pests
Lonchaeidae
new host records
Tephritidae
Ulidiidae
Back to Top