Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 June 2012 Abundance of Frankliniella schultzei (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in Flowers on Major Vegetable Crops of South Florida
Garima Kakkar, Dakshina R. Seal, Philip A. Stansly, Oscar E. Liburd, Vivek Kumar
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The flower thrips, Frankliniella schultzei (Trybom), has only recently been recognized as a pest of vegetable crops in south Florida. Little is known about its abundance and impact on vegetable crops in this region. Therefore, a field experiment was conducted comparing F. schultzei abundance in blooms of the 5 key fruiting vegetable crops grown in south Florida, i.e., cucumber, pepper, snap bean, squash and tomato. Mean number of F schultzei larvae was highest in cucumber flowers (78.1 larvae/5 flowers) and lowest in bean flowers (5.1 larvae/5 flowers). However, adults of F schultzei were most numerous in tomato flowers (27.5 adults/5 flowers) and least numerous in snap bean flowers (3.5 adults/ 5 flowers). Neither larvae nor adults of F. schultzei were found in pepper flowers in the present study. The flower samples collected from 5 vegetable crops were also found to be infested with 3 other thrips species. Amongst these, Thrips palmi Karny was the second most abundant thrips species. Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) was found in low numbers on all crops except pepper, and Frankliniella fusca (Hinds) was found only on tomato. The above information should be useful in the development of monitoring programs, design of pest management strategies and in the timely application of preventive or suppressive measures in south Florida.

Thrips pests are ubiquitous because of their prominent dispersive behavior and ability to colonize many hosts in a wide range of habitats. The tropics and subtropics are the most suitable regions for thrips survival, although some thrips species also thrive in temperate regions (Mound 1997). Florida is especially vulnerable to thrips invasion and subsequent establishment, because of the State's diverse flora and year-round production of numerous fruit, ornamental and vegetable crops. While the majority of economically important thrips species are polyphagous in nature, some thrips species show preference for just a few host species on which they may reproduce and survive (Mound 2004). Several thrips species, including Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande), the western flower thrips, have been reported to exhibit variability in host preferences in the same geographical region with time (Doederlein & Sites 1993). However, little information is presently available on host switching behavior of thrips.

Frankliniella schultzei (Trybom), also known as the common blossom thrips, is a polyphagous herbivore known to exploit more than 83 host species belonging to 35 different families of plants (Milne & Walter 2000; Palmer 1990). However, it is not an exclusively phytophagous pest, as it has been reported to feed on eggs of the twospotted spidermite, Tetranychus urticae Koch, on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.; Malvales: Malvaceae) (Trichilo & Leigh 1986; Wilson et al. 1996). Frankliniella schultzei is one of the major pests of various ornamental and vegetable crops around the globe (Palmer 1990; Vierbergen & Mantel 1991; Milne et al. 1996). In Cuba and Brazil, it is one of the key pests of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.; Solanales: Solanaceae), and, accordingly, it is also known by the common name, the tomato thrips (Haji et al. 1998; Jones 2005). However, in Florida F. schultzei has been found to be associated more with flowers of ornamental plants (Funderburk et al. 2007) and cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.; Cucurbitales: Cucurbitaceae) (Kakkar et al. 2011).

Frantz & Fasulo (1997) reported the presence of F. schultzei in cucurbit and tomato fields in Florida. Although this pest has not subsequently been reported in Florida, we found it infesting field crops in Miami-Dade County in 2008. Considering the paucity of information on F. schultzei and the potential host plants at risk in Miami-Dade County, a major producer of fresh winter vegetables, this study was conducted to evaluate the abundance of F. schultzei in the flowers of each of 5 major vegetable crops in this County, i.e., snap bean, (Phaseolus vulgaris L.; Fabales: Fabaceae), squash (Cucurbita pepo L.; Cucurbitales: Cucurbitaceae), cucumber, tomato, and pepper (Capsicum spp.; Solanales: Solanaceae). The results from this study should prove helpful in determining which of these crops are most vulnerable to attack by F. schultzei in this region. In addition, we report on the thrips species complex inhabiting the flowers of each of these 5 vegetable crops infested with F. schultzei.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Abundances of F. schultzei was studied on cucumber (C. sativus L. cv ‘Vlaspek’), pepper (C. annum L. cv ‘King Arthur’), snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv ‘Opus’), squash (C. pepo L. cv ‘Straightneck’) and tomato (S. lycopersicum cv ‘Flora-Dade’). The study was conducted in a field at the University of Florida, Tropical Research and Education Center (TREC), Homestead, Florida during the fall of 2009. The 5 vegetable crops selected for this study were planted in their respective plots adjacent to each other in the same field. Each plot had 10 planted rows where each row represented a data point. A 9-m wide fallow buffer area separated adjacent crops. Soil type was Krome gravelly loam (loamy-skeletal, carbonatic hyperthermic lithic Udorthents), which consists of about 33% soil and 67% limestone pebbles (>2 mm). Fields were prepared using standard commercial practices (Olson & Santos 2010).

Crop Management

‘Vlaspek’ cucumber seeds were sown on 17–VIII, 15.2 cm apart within the row and 91.4 cm between rows on flat ground. Each plot measured 251 m2 consisting of ten 30 m long rows. At planting, 8–16–16 (N-P-K) was applied at 908 kg/ha in a furrow 20 cm apart from the seed row. Halosulfuron methyl (Sandea®, Gowan Company LLC, Yuma, Arizona) at 55 gm/ha was used as a pre-emergence herbicide to control weeds. Copper hydroxide (Kocide® 3000, BASF Ag Products, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina) at 0.8 L/ha and chlorothalonil (Bravo®, Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc., Greensboro, North Carolina) at 1.75 L/ha were used in rotation at 2-wk intervals to prevent fungal disease. Crops were irrigated twice a wk with 3 cm of water using overhead sprinklers. Fertilizer 4–0–8 (N-P-K) at 236 L/ha/ wk was applied as an in-furrow band in the field to provide 2.4 kg-N/ha/wk beginning 3 wk after planting.

‘Opus’ snap beans were direct-seeded 7.5 cm apart within the row on flat ground on 18–VIII. Plot characteristics and cultural practices were the same as described above. ‘Straightneck’ squash was directly seeded at 21 cm within the row spacing on 2–IX to compensate for earlier onset of flowering, and thus ensure that all the plant species had equal chances of being infested by F. schultzei. Otherwise plot dimensions and horticultural practices were the same as described above. ‘King Arthur’ pepper transplants were planted 17–VIII, 25 cm apart within row on raised beds 91 cm wide, 15 cm high, and 182 cm between centers. Beds were covered with 1.5 ml black polyethylene mulch. Each plot consisted of 10 raised beds each 30 m long making a plot of ∼500 m2. Management of each crop including use of fertilizers, herbicides and fungicides was as described for cucumber. ‘Flora-Dade’ tomato seedlings were transplanted 30 cm apart within row on raised beds as for pepper on 18–VIII. The crop was drip irrigated twice a week. Fertilizer 4–0–8 (N-P-K) was applied at 236 L/ha once a week beginning 3 wk after planting through the drip lines to provide 2.4 kg-N/ha. Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner (Bacillales: Bacillaceae) based insecticides, Dipel DF® (B. t. var. kurstaki) at 1.1 kg/ha and Xentari DF® (B. t. var. aizawai) at 1.2 L/ha (Valent Biosciences Corporation, Libertyville, Illinois) were used to control lepidopteran pests in all the experimental crops except snap bean.

Sampling

Samples were collected and processed independently for each of the plant hosts during the fifth, sixth and seventh wk after planting. Five flowers (1 flower/plant) were randomly collected from each row of the planted plot. All flower samples belonging to each row were placed in a separate ziplock® bag (17 × 22 cm) marked with date of collection, row number and host type. Samples were transported to the laboratory and placed individually in a 1-qt (0.946 L) plastic cup with 75% ethanol for 30 min to dislodge various life stages of thrips. Plant material was carefully removed from the cup leaving the thrips in the alcohol. The contents in the alcohol were sieved using a 25-µm grating, USA Standard Testing Sieve (W. S. Tyler, Inc., Mentor, Ohio) as per Seal & Baranowski (1992). The residue in the sieve was washed with 75% alcohol into a Petri dish.

Samples were sorted under a dissecting microscope at 12X according to the following characteristics. Female adults of F. schultzei and F. fusca (Hinds) are dark brown and measure less than 1.5 mm in length (Figs. 1a and b). Thrips palmi and F. occidentalis adults are comparatively lighter in color with body lengths ranging from 0.8–1.0 mm (Capinera 2000) and 1.5–1.66 mm, respectively (De Kogel et al. 1999) (Figs. 1c and d). Samples were stored in 75% ethanol for later identification using taxonomic traits illustrated by Hoddle (2009). The ocellar setae on head are one of the important features for identifying thrips at the species level. All 4 thrips species possesses 3 pairs of ocellar setae on head. The third pair, also known as interocellar setae, arises between the anterior ends of the 2 hind ocelli in F. schultzei and F. occidentalis (Figs. 2a and c). However, in F. fusca and T. palmi the third pair originates above the 2 hind ocelli (Figs. 2b and d). In F. fusca, each ocellar seta arises away from the anterior margin of the 2 hind ocellus (Fig. 2b) and in T. palmi, it arises from a region closer to the posterior end of the apical ocellus (Fig. 2d). The postocular setae on head of F. schultzei, F. fusca and T. palmi are shorter than the interocellar setae; unlike F. occidentalis in which the postocular and interocellar setae are of equal size. The posteromarginal comb on the eighth abdominal segment was the main characteristic used for thrips identification (Fig. 3). The comb on abdominal segment of F. schultzei is not fully developed; it is incomplete medially and bears short microtrichia on either end (Fig. 3a). However, the comb on the eighth abdominal segment of F. occidentalis and T. palmi is fully developed and bears a complete row of microtrichia. The comb is absent on F. fusca (Fig. 3b).

In the collected flower samples larvae of T. palmi were recognized by their characteristic reddish yellow color and slow movement (D. R. Seal, personal communication). We assumed other larvae to be F. schultzei. They were similar to each other, and adults of F. occidentalis and F. fusca were rare in flowers.

Statistical Analysis

Each row of a planted plot represented a data point, thus, 10 samples were collected from each of the plots during a sampling. Data on the abundance of F. schultzei larvae and adults on each crop (except pepper) were averaged for all samplings The mean numbers of larvae and adults on each crop were compared separately using one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (PROC GLM, SAS Institute Inc. 2003). Data were analyzed independently for larvae and adults. Data were transformed by log10 (x+1) before analysis. Untransformed means and standard errors are reported in the Table 1 and Fig. 4. Means of larvae and adult on various crops were separated using Tukey's HSD (Honestly Significant Difference) procedure (P < 0.05).

RESULTS

Flowers of 4 of the 5 putative hosts were found to be infested with F. schultzei adults. Abundance of F. schultzei adults in tomato flowers was not different from that in squash and cucumber flowers (Tukey's HSD test, P < 0.005) (Fig. 4). The least number of F. schultzei adults was captured in flowers of snap bean and none was found in pepper flowers. The number of F. schultzei adults in flowers of tomato and squash was significantly greater than in snap bean (F = 4.28; df = 3, 36; P < 0.0001) (Fig. 4).

Mean number of F. schultzei larvae was highest in cucumber flowers (Fig. 4). The infestation level in cucumber flowers was numerically higher than in flowers of the other 4 hosts (F = 30.35; df = 3, 36; P < 0.0001). Not a single F. schultzei larva was found in pepper flowers. There were no significant differences in the numbers of larvae sampled from squash, tomato and snap bean (Tukey's HSD test, α= 0.05).

Fig. 1.

Slide mount of female adults of a) Frankliniella schultzei, b) Frankliniella fusca, c) Frankliniella occidentalis, and d) Thrips palmi.

f01_468.jpg

In the course of sampling 5 vegetable crops, other thrips species were also encountered. By comparing the count of different thrips species (Table 1), it is apparent that the average number of F. schultzei in flowers was several folds greater than the other species. The predominant species sampled from the 5 crops besides F. schultzei was T. palmi Karny, followed by F. occidentalis and F. fusca (Table 1). The average number of T. palmi adults in flowers of cucumber (F = 38.71; df = 2, 27; P < 0.0001) and squash (F = 6.10; df = 2, 27; P = 0.006) was significantly lower than F. schultzei (Tukey's HSD test, α= 0.05). The highest number of T. palmi was found in snap bean flowers with an average of ∼1 adult per flower, followed by squash, and cucumber. The number of T. palmi collected from flowers of these crops was the least from pepper and none in tomato. Frankliniella bispinosa (Morgan), Florida flower thrips was found on bean flowers (data not shown) but the number was fewer than 4 specimens in the total number of thrips adults collected from various crops during the study. Frankliniella occidentalis was collected from squash, tomato, cucumber and bean flowers, with the number of adults ranging between 0.2–1.0 per 5 flowers sampled from various hosts in the study. Frankliniella fusca was collected from tomato flowers with an average number of 0.6 adults per 5 flowers.

Fig. 2.

Head of each of 4 thrips species a) Frankliniella schultzei, b) Frankliniella fusca, c) Frankliniella occidentalis, d) Thrips palmi. Note the interocellar setae (IOS), postocular setae (POS), a pair of hind ocelli (HO) and apical ocelli (AO).

f02_468.jpg

DISCUSSION

The study demonstrated that the flowers of 5 major winter fresh market vegetable crops in Miami-Dade County were infested with at least 4 different thrips species: F. schultzei, F. fusca, F. occidentalis and T. palmi. The density of individual thrips species other than F. schultzei encountered in flowers of sampled crops was small. The low density could be due to various factors including: 1) unsuitability of these crops as hosts of these thrips species, 2) naturally low abundance of thrips species in the area of study, for example F. fusca, 3) the flower being the plant part least preferred by some of these thrips species, for example T. palmi, and (4) competition from F. schultzei.

Frankliniella schultzei was reported as a pest of several ornamental and vegetable crops (Jiménez et al. 2006). In the present study, the densities of F. schultzei adults in the flowers of various plant species were consistently similar for the 3 most preferred hosts, i.e., tomato, squash and cucumber. The high density of F. schultzei in tomato flowers was in agreement with the findings of Jiménez et al. (2006), Monteiro et al. (2001) and Sakurai (2004), who reported tomato as one of several vegetable hosts of F. schultzei in Cuba, Brazil and Paraguay, respectively.

Fig. 3.

Eighth abdominal segment of each of 4 thrips species, i.e., a) Frankliniella schultzei, b) Frankliniella fusca, c) Frankliniella occidentalis, d) Thrips palmi

f03_468.jpg

There is an essential difference between a primary and a secondary host of thrips. While species of thrips may forage on a wide range of plant species, a primary host fully supports the reproduction of the thrips species and adequately provides it with food and shelter. However, a provisional or secondary host is usually exploited temporarily for food and shelter, and does not provide an adequate substrate for reproduction (Mound 2005). Thus, it is important to distinguish between primary (reproductive) hosts, and secondary (provisional) hosts of a thrips species

Based on the larval densities in the flowers of the 5 major vegetable crops in Miami-Dade County, we found that squash, tomato, bean and cucumber were capable of supporting reproduction of F. schultzei. However when these plant species were ranked for the host status based on larval density, a striking pattern was observed. Only in cucumber flowers did the number of F. schultzei larvae exceed the adults, suggesting that cucumber is potentially a major reproductive host of this pest. The larval counts were lower than adult counts on the other 4 hosts (bean, pepper, squash, and tomato), and thus these crops can be regarded as secondary reproductive hosts of this pest in south Florida.

Variations in host plant preferences of pests inhabiting different geographical regions have been reported for other thrips species, for example canistel (Pouteria campechiana (Kunth) Baehni), which has never been reported as a host of Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood (chilli thrips) was preferred by it over mango (Mangifera indica L.) and other hosts in Florida (Kumar et al. 2012). Probable reasons for such plasticity in behavior have been suggested to be genetic and/or environmental (Jaenike 1990), although there is little published evidence for the role of genetic variation in host preference. Environmentally induced variation is known to cause differences in host preferences for a species in different regions. Jaenike (1990) postulated that the abundance of the most preferred host in a region can result in higher thresholds of attraction to secondary host plants, which tend to be disregarded by the pest in such circumstances. Absence of this preferred host in another geographic region changes the herbivore's threshold of attraction and thus the preference level for secondary host plants. Tomato is one of the important hosts of F. schultzei in the area of their origin (South America). Preference of F. schultzei for cucumber over tomato in this study, where the pest was given free choice contradicts the concept of threshold of attraction.

TABLE 1.

ABUNDANCE OF THRIPS ADULTS PER 5 BLOOMS IN 5 VEGETABLE CROP SPECIES IN SOUTH FLORIDA.

t01_468.gif

Flower thrips belonging to genus Frankliniella use visual and olfactory cues to find hosts (Terry 1997), and the bright yellow flowers of tomato play an important role in attracting adults of Frankliniella spp. (Reitz 2005). However, the inability of the commercially grown tomato to serve as reproductive hosts for flower thrips may restrict the rate of population increase of this genus on tomato (Reitz 2005). While these are assumptions to understand host preferences of F. schultzei, the study helped in determining the reproductive host range of F. schultzei in south Florida. Further studies on the seasonal abundance of F. schultzei on these hosts will refine our knowledge of dispersive behavior, population dynamics, damage potential and interaction between F. schultzei and its hosts; such information is needed as a foundation of an effective thrips management program.

Fig. 4.

Numbers of Frankliniella schultzei larvae and adults (Mean ± SEM) on flowers of 5 host plants sampled during the fall of 2009. Means with the same letter are not significantly different (P > 0.05, Tukey's HSD test).

f04_468.jpg

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank vegetable IPM laboratory (TREC-UF) members including Charles Carter, and Catherine Sabines for technical support and field preparation. The Florida Agricultural Experiment Station and the University of Florida's Center for Tropical Agriculture supported this study. We are grateful to Mr. Thomas L. Skarlinsky, USDA, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Miami, Florida, for invaluable assistance in identifying thrips species and supplying images of diagnostic traits. We also thank 3 anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on the manuscript.

REFERENCES CITED

1.

J. L. Capinera 2000. Thrips palmi Karny. Entomol. Nematol. Dept., IFAS, Univ. Florida.  http://entnemdept.ufl.edu/creatures/veg/melon_thrips.htm Google Scholar

2.

W. J. De Kogel , D. Bosco , M. Van Der Hoek , and C. Mollema 1999. Effects of host plant on body size of Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and its correlation with reproductive capacity. European J. Entomol. 96: 365–368. Google Scholar

3.

T. A. Doederlein , and R. W. Sites 1993. Host plant preferences of Frankliniella occidentalis and Thrips tabaci (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) of onions and associated weeds on the southern high plains. J. Econ. Entomol. 86: 1706–1713. Google Scholar

4.

G. Frantz , and T. R. Fasulo 1997. Thrips: A Knowledgebase of Vegetable Thrips. Glades Crop Care,  http://www.gladescropcare.com/GCC_software.html (11August 2011). Google Scholar

5.

J. Funderburk , S. Dlffie , J. Sharma , A. Hodges , and L. Osborne 2007. Thrips of ornamentals in the southeastern US., Florida Coop. Ext. Serv., Entomol. Nematol. Dept., IFAS, Univ. Florida.  http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/in754 Google Scholar

6.

F. N. P. Haji , De J. A. Alencar , and L. Prezotti 1998. Principal pest of tomato and alternatives for control, pp. 50 In Empresa Brasileira de pesquisa Agropecuaria, Centro de Pesquisa Agropeucuaria do Tropico Semi-Arido, Brazil. Google Scholar

7.

M. S. Hoddle , L. A. Mound , and D. L. Paris 2009.  http://keys.lucidcentral.org/keys/v3/thrips_of_california/Thrips_of_California.html (Accessed XII 2 2011) Google Scholar

8.

J. Jaenike 1990. Host specialization in phytophagous insects. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21: 243–273. Google Scholar

9.

S. F. Jiménez Jiménez L. Pérez López, M. Toro , C. Granda , A. Mateo H. Sariol , E. Rodríguez , R. Pérez , R Jiménez, A. Pérez-Alejo , and R. Vázquez 2006. Dispersión, distributión actual y nuevos reservorios de Frankliniella schultzei Trybom (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) en Cuba. Fitosanidad 10: 273–278. Google Scholar

10.

D. R. Jones 2005. Plant viruses transmitted by thrips. European J. Plant Pathol. 113: 119–157. Google Scholar

11.

G. Kakkar , D. R. Seal , and V. Kumar 2011. Assessing abundance and distribution of an invasive thrips Frankliniella schultzei (Trybom) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in South Florida. Bull. Entomol. Res. DOI: 10.1017/S0007485311000599. Google Scholar

12.

V. Kumar , D. R. Seal , G. Kakkar , C. McKenzie , and L. S. Osborne 2012. New tropical fruit hosts of Scirtothrips dorsalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and its relative abundance on them in south Florida. Fla. Entomol. 95: 205–207. Google Scholar

13.

M. Milne , and G. H. Walter 2000. Feeding and breeding across host plants within a locality by the widespread thrips Frankliniella schultzei, and the invasive potential of polyphagous herbivores. Divers, and Distri. 6: 243–257. Google Scholar

14.

R. C Monteiro , L. A. Mound, and R. A. Zucchi 2001. Espécies de Frankliniella (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) de importância agrícola no Brasil. Neotrop. Entomol. 1: 65–71. Google Scholar

15.

L. A. Mound 1997. Biological diversity, pp. 197–215 In T. Lewis [ed.], Thrips as Crop Pests. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. Google Scholar

16.

L. A. Mound 2004. Australian Thysanoptera-biological diversity and a diversity of studies. Aust. J. Entomol. 43: 248–257. Google Scholar

17.

L. A. Mound 2005. Thysanoptera: Diversity and Interactions. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 50: 247–269. Google Scholar

18.

S. M. Olson , and B. Santos 2010. Vegetable production handbook for Florida 2010–2011. EDIS, Florida Coop.Ext.  http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/features/handbooks/vegetableguide.htmlGoogle Scholar

19.

J. M. Palmer 1990. Identification of the common thrips of tropical Africa (Thysanoptera: Insecta). Trop. Pest Mgmt. 36: 27–49. Google Scholar

20.

S. R. Reitz 2005. Biology and ecology of flower thrips in relation to Tomato spotted wilt virus. Acta Hort. 695: 75–84. Google Scholar

21.

T. Sakurai 2004. Transmission of tomato spotted wilt virus by the dark form of Frankliniella schultzei (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) originating in tomato fields in Paraguay. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 39: 189– 194. Google Scholar

22.

D. R. Seal , and R. M. Baranowski 1992. Effectiveness of different insecticides for the control of melon thrips, Thrips palmi Karny (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Proc. Florida. State Hort. Soc. 105: 315–319. Google Scholar

23.

L. I. Terry 1997. Host selection, communication and reproductive behavior, pp. 65–118 In T. Lewis [ed.], Thrips as Crop Pests, CAB International, New York. Google Scholar

24.

P. J. Trichilo , and T. F. Leigh 1986. Predation on spider mite eggs by the western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), an opportunist in a cotton agroecosystem. Environ. Entomol. 15: 821–825. Google Scholar

25.

G. Vierbergen , and W. P. Mantel 1991. Contribution to the knowledge of Frankliniella schultzei (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Entomol. Ber. (Amsterdam) 51: 7–12. Google Scholar

26.

L. J. Wilson , L. R. Bauer , and G. H. Walter 1996. ‘Phytophagous’ thrips are predators of twospotted spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae) on cotton in Australia. Bull. Entomol. Res. 86: 297–205. Google Scholar
Garima Kakkar, Dakshina R. Seal, Philip A. Stansly, Oscar E. Liburd, and Vivek Kumar "Abundance of Frankliniella schultzei (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in Flowers on Major Vegetable Crops of South Florida," Florida Entomologist 95(2), 468-475, (1 June 2012). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.095.0231
Published: 1 June 2012
KEYWORDS
abundance
Frankliniella fusca
Frankliniella occidentalis
Frankliniella schultzei
Thrips palmi
vegetable crops
Back to Top