Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 December 2012 Phylogenetic Analysis of Trialeurodes Spp. (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) from India Based on Differences in Mitochondrial and Nuclear Dna
H. K. Roopa, N. K. Krishna Kumar, R. Asokan, K. B. Rebijith, Riaz Mahmood, Abraham Verghese
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

About 55 species of Trialeurodes have been described with only a few viruliferous species like T. vaporariorum and T. abutilonea, which are able to transmit Criniviruses (Clostero-viridae) and T. ricini, which is able to transmit Begomovirus spp. (Geminiviridae). Quick and accurate identification of whitefly vectors in the early life stages is important from the point of view of understanding the epidemiology of crinivirus associated plant diseases, and in their management and quarantine. Morphological identification is further strengthened by DNA barcoding. In this regard, we examined genetic differences in mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase-I (COI) gene and the internal transcribe spacers (ITS) sequences of ribosomal DNA among various populations of T. vaporariorum collected from different geographic locations in the state of Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, and Andhra Pradesh in India. Our studies are the first to analyze the genetic variation of T. vaporariorum populations in India, which showed no appreciable differences. This clearly indicated that there are no cryptic species or biotypes in T. vaporariorum in India in contrast to the studies of B. tabaci in which there is evidence for many biotypes. The phylogenetic analyses comprised of 4 Trialeurodes species showed 2 clades. Clade I is comprised of T. vaporariorum and T. abutilonea which are genetically close. Clade II consists of the remaining 2 species, viz., T. lauri and T. ricini. Also the current study provided evidence of the suggested emergence of biotypes T. ricini.

Whiteflies (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) are important sap sucking insect pests of agricultural and horticultural crops, and can cause crop damage either by direct feeding or by transmission of plant pathogenic viruses. The three most damaging and ubiquitous species are the cotton whitefly or sweet potato whitefly (Bemisia tabaci Gennadius), sliver leaf whitefly (Bemisia argentifolii [Bellows and Perring]) and the green house whitefly (Trialeurodes vaporariorum Westwood). Their rapid population growth is due in part to arrhenotoky or arrhenotokous parthenogenetic reproduction of whiteflies in which unfertilized eggs develop into males and fertilized eggs to females. The piercing-sucking feeding behavior of whiteflies can cause considerable crop damage. Currently 55 species in the world are assigned to the genus Trialeurodes (Mound & Halsey 1978), which is one of the largest genera in the family Aleyrodidae. The greenhouse or glasshouse whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum, was described by Westwood in 1856 as Aleyrodes vaporariorum. It is a polyphagous insect, and plants belonging to 82 families serve as its hosts (Mound & Halsey 1978). Feeding by nymphs and adults draws proteins and other nutrients of plant sap, and they excrete surplus sugars as ‘honeydew’. At high populations, the copious honeydew produced leads to the growth of sooty mold, which restricts photosynthesis, stunts plants and causes leaf necrosis (Byrne et al. 1990). T. vaporariorum can also act as a vector by transmitting viruses to plants, viz., Beet pseudo yellow virus (BPYV) (Closterovirus) (Duffus et al. 1965.; Tzanetakis et al. 2003, 2004a), Potato yellow vein virus (PYDV) (Alba 1950), Tomato infectious chlorosis virus (TICV), Tomato chlorosis virus (ToCV)( Duffus et al. 1995; Wisler et al. 1998a, 1998b) and Strawberry pallidosis associated virus (SPaV) (Tzanetakis et al. 2003). Recent observation on B. tabaci states, it's a complex of 24 morphologically indistinguishable species/biotypes and defined by analyzing consensus sequences and 3.5% of mt-COI sequences pairwise genetic divergence. (Paul J. De Barro 2011). Development of biotypes in B. tabaci may be due to various causes including insecticide selection pressure and development of resistance, host variation, and geography; all of which may influence vector potential for various viruses (Bird 1957; Mound 1963; Costa and Russell 1975; Bird & Maramorosch 1978). In contrast to the case of B. tabaci, fewer studies were carried out with T. vaporariorum, which is becoming a serious pest in glasshouse or polyhouse cultivation of agricultural crops. In addition through the characterization of esterase banding patterns, Idriss et al. (1997) reported the existence of 5 different biotypes in T. ricini populations.

This study investigates the evolutionary relationship of Trialeurodes spp. based on sequence variation of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase-I (CO-I) gene, and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences of ribosomal DNA. This is one of the first studies to examine the genetic population structure of T. vaporariorum over a broad range.

MATERIALS and METHODS

Collection of Whitefly Populations

Adults and nymphs of the whitefly, T. vaporariorum, were collected using a hand-held aspirator from 2009 to 2011 on ornamental and vegetables at 22 different locations in South India (Table 1). The specimens were preserved in 70% ethanol for further analysis.

Morphological Identification

Specimens were slide mounted with Canada balsam using the procedure described by Brown (1997). The taxonomic characters were used for identification based on Martin (1987).

DNA Extraction and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

Trialeurodes vaporariorum were taken individually and a small part of each abdomen was used to extract the genomic DNA using the modified cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide buffer (CTAB) method (Saghai-Maroof et al. 1984). The rest of the insect body was retained as the specimen voucher and placed in the Division of Biotechnology, IIHR, Bengaluru. Briefly, a part of the abdomen was ground with 1.0 mL of CTAB 2%, 100 mM Tris-HCI (pH 8.0), 1.4 M sodium chloride, 20 mM EDTA, 0.1% of 2-mercaptoethanol (added just prior to use) and suspended in the same buffer. The suspension was incubated at 65 °C for 2 h and then an equal volume of chloroform: isoamylalcohol (24:1) was added. The suspension was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm (Eppendorf 5415 C) for 10 min at 8 °C. The upper aqueous layer was transferred to a fresh micro centrifuge tube taking care not to disturb the middle protein interface. DNA was precipitated by adding an equal volume of ice-cold 95% ethyl alcohol. The precipitated DNA was spun at 10,000 rpm (Eppendorf 5415 C) and the resultant DNA pellet was washed with 70% ethanol and dissolved in 50 µL DNase-, RNase- and Protease-free molecular biology water (5 PRIME Hamburg, Gaithersburg, Maryland, US). Extracted DNA was further purified to be free of RNA contaminants by addition of 10 µL of RNase. The intact genomic DNA was visualized using in a 0.8% agarose gel and quantified using a fluorometer (DyNa quant 200™, Hoefer,  www.hoeferinc.com) following standard procedures. Depending upon the concentration, the DNA samples were diluted with sterile water to get a working solution of 20–25 ng/µL. A portion of the total DNA was preserved in glycerol (10%) at -80 °C for future reference.

TABLE 1.

DETAILS OF SPECIMENS FOR WHICH CO-I AND ITS-1 MARKERS WERE SEQUENCED.

t01_1086.gif

TABLE 2.

PRIMERS EMPLOYED IN THE CURRENT STUDY.

t02_1086.gif

The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out in a thermal cycler (AB-Applied Biosystems, Veriti 96 wells) with the following cycles; 94 °C for 4 min as initial denaturation followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, for 45 s at 47 °C, 54 °C, and 52 °C for COX-I, mtCO-I and ITS-I respectively, for 45 s at 72 °C and for 20 min at 72 °C as the final extension. The primers as mentioned in Table 2 were specific to mitochondrial DNA; and nuclear DNA fragments were used in the present study. PCR was performed in 25-µL total reaction volume containing 20 picomoles of each primer, 10 mM Tris HCl (pH -8.3), 50 mM KCl, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.25 mM of each dNTP and 0.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas GmBH, St. Leon-Rot, Germany). The amplified products were resolved in 1.5% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide (10µg/mL) and visualized in a gel documentation system (UVP)

Molecular Cloning and Sequencing

The PCR amplified fragments were eluted using Nucleospin® Extract II according to the manufacturer's protocol (Macherey-Nagel, Duren, Germany) and ligated into the general purpose-cloning vector, InsT/Aclone (Fermentas GmBH, St. Leon-Rot, Germany) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The transformed cells were spread on LB agar plates containing X-gal (300 ug/mL), IPTG (120 ug/mL) and ampicillin (100 ug/mL). The plates were then incubated at 37 °C overnight to screen blue and white colonies; and all the white colonies (colonies harboring the insert) were maintained on LBA containing ampicillin (100 mg/ml), incubated at 37 °C overnight and stored at 4 °C until further use. Plasmids were prepared from the overnight culture of the positive colonies cultured in LB broth (enzymatic casein- 10 g, yeast extract-5 g, NaCl-5 g in 1000 mL of water, pH 7.0) using GeneJET™ Plasmid Miniprep Kit (Fermentas, Germany) according to manufacturer's protocol. Cloning was confirmed by colony PCR and recombinant plasmid comparison with colony without insert. Sequencing was carried out in an automated sequencer (ABI Prism 310; Applied Biosystems, USA) using M13 universal primers both in forward and reverse directions. Homology search was carried out using BLAST ( http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), and the differences in nucleotide sequences of T. vaporariorum were determined using the sequence alignment editor ‘BioEdit’.

Phylogenetic Analysis

All the sequences generated in the present study, corresponding to COX-I, mtCO-I and ITS-1 was aligned using BioEdit. 4. 0 program using Clustal W. The alignment was further analyzed using MEGA.4.0 (Kumar et al. 1993). Maximum- Parsimony (MP) and Neighbour-Joining (NJ) trees were constructed using the Kimura2-parameter (K2P) distance model (Kimura 1980; Saitou & Nei 1987). All the corresponding sequences for different mitochondrial and ribosomal markers of T. vaporariorum were deposited in the NCBI-GenBank.

RESULTS and DISUSSION

Molecular diversity studies in various insects of importance in agriculture pave the way in identifying new species (Ball & Armstrong 2006), biotypes (Perring 2001), cryptic species (Hebert et al. 2004) and haplotypes (Toda & Murai 2007), which are difficult to identify through morphological characters. Insect pests with piercing-sucking mouthparts are of major concern both agricultural and horticultural crops because many of them possess immense vectoring capacity and they are developing insecticide resistance (Denholm et al., 1996, 1998). One of the invasive species, B. tabaci is reported as ‘species complex’ with the existence of 24 biotypes (Paul J. De Barro et al 2011) and also is an important vector for many begomo viruses. Attempts to define these biotypes were made by using esterase banding patterns and a range of biological characters (Bedford et al. 1994). Subsequently many biotypes have been defined primarily by differences in both or either mitochondrial COI or ribosomal ITSl DNA sequences with little or no meaningful biological data to support their uniqueness (Boykin et al. 2007). In India, another whitefly species, T. vaporariorum, also has been gaining importance to rival B. tabaci in developing insecticide resistance, especially in polyhouses on ornamentals, vegetables and rarely in open fields. Considering their pest potential, we judged it to be necessary to analyze the molecular diversity in Trialeurodes species viz. T. vaporariorum, T. ricini, T. lauri and T. abutilonea. Recently, Idriss et al. (2009) proved the existence of 5 different biotypes in T. ricini using esterase banding patterns, and proved that these biotypes have varying efficiencies in transmitting Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV).

TABLE 3.

MAXIMUM COMPOSITE LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATE OF THE PATTERN OF NUCLEOTIDE SUBSTITUTION FROM DIFFERENT POPULATIONS OF TRIALEURODES VAPORARIORUM.

t03_1086.gif

Fig. 1.

Maximum Parsimony tree using COI and ITS sequences with bootstrap support (1000 replicates) showing phylogram for Trialeurodes vaporariorum collected from different hosts and different geographical locations in South India. Bemisia tabaci was used as an out group in the analysis. (MEGA. 4.0)

f01_1086.jpg

COX-I, mtCOI and ITS-1 sequencing yielded 658bp, 825bp and 525bp nucleotide sequences, respectively, and a total of 22 specimens for T. vaporariorum collected on various hosts from different geographical regions in Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh (Table. 1). All of these sequences have been deposited in the NCBI-Genbank database under the accession numbers JQ339309 to JQ339350 (Table. 1).

CO-I and ITS-1 sequences were aligned using Clustal X (Version 1.83, 2003; Thompson et al. 1997) with default settings. The Maximum Composite Likelihood Estimate of the Pattern of Nucleotide Substitution for T. vaporariorum sequences was performed using MEGA 4.0 (Tamura et al. 2007). The reliability of the clustering pattern in the trees was determined by the boot-strap test, with 1000 replications. Each entry showed the probability of substitution from one base (row) to another base (column) instantaneously. Rates of different transitional substitutions are shown in bold and those of transversional substitutions are shown in italics (Table 3). The T. vaporariorum nucleotide frequencies are 0.272 (A), 0.269 (T), 0.226 (C) and 0.232 (G). The base composition of the COX-I gene fragment was biased toward Adenine (A) and Thymine (T), which together constituted 54.1% of the total. The overall transition (ti)/transversion (tv) bias of T. vaporariorum nucleotide sequence is R = 1.02, where R= [A*G*k1+T*C*k2]/ [(A+G)*(T+C)]. Codon positions included were 1st + 2nd + 3rd + Noncoding. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated from the datasets (complete deletion option). All calculations were conducted in MEGA 4.0 (Tamura et al. 2007). Summary statistics for the different substitution changes are shown in Table. 3. Maximum Parsimony (MP) and maximum likelihood (ML) analysis were performed with PAUP*4.0b10 (Swofford 1998), using the heuristic search procedure with 1000 random additions of sequences and 10 trees held at each pseudo-replicate, and the tree bisection reconnection (TBR) branch swapping method; all characters were treated as unordered and equally weighted for the MP analysis.

TABLE 4.

DETAILS OF MTCO-I SEQUENCES FOR TRIALEURODES SPP ACQUIRED FROM NCBI-GENBANK FOR PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS.

t04_1086.gif

In India, T. vaporariorum is gaining importance as a major direct pest on crops in polyhouses. Therefore, specimens were collected from different geographical locations in Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh and the corresponding sequences for CO-I region and ITS-1 revealed that there are very little sequence variations in the nucleotides. The phylogram suggested that T. vaporariorum is a single species (Fig. 1), which contrast with corresponding observations of the B. tabaci species complex (Boykin et al. 2007) and Thrips tabaci (Brunner et al. 2004). The present study clearly indicated that there are neither biotype nor host associated genetic differences in T. vaporariorum. For the phylogenetic analysis various Trialeurodes spp. sequences of the mt-CO1 gene were acquired from NCBI- GenBank (Table 4) and were used along with our data generated in the present study. Four different Trialeurodes species viz. T. vaporariorum, T. ricini, T. lauri, and T. abutilonea were analyzed and the mt-COl sequences revealed that, there are 2 major clades; i.e., clade I consists of T. vaporariorum and T. abutilonea and clade II consists of T. ricini and T. lauri (Fig. 2). Another interesting observation resulted from our molecular data was the strong support for the evidence of biotypes emergence as in earlier case of T. ricini by Idriss et al, 2009. The phylogenetic analysis showed that two populations from Egypt, collected on Ricinus communis formed the clade I and the rest of the populations collected on various geographical locations viz. Spain, Gambia and Nigeria formed the Clade II. According to Hebert et al, (2004), sequence thresholds of 10X, the mean intraspecific mtCOI variation for group under study as an approximate method of screening for potentially different (cryptic) species or biotypes. Using MEGA.5.0, intraspecific and interspecific distances were calculated for both group-I and group-II observed in the MP tree for T. ricini. The intraspecific distance ranges for group-I and group-II of T. ricini 0.00–0.35. The interspecific distances for group-I and group-II of T. ricini is 6.25%. Thus our studies showed that T. ricini is not a single polyphagous species but on contrary, by the standards of genetic and ecological differentiation in other species groups and also based on Hebert's barcoding gap of 10X interspecific-to-intraspecific distances, the recognition of a distinct biotypes may be considered. On the other hand T. lauri also formed two clades with the variations in the nucleotide sequences, however unable to satisfy the sequence thresholds of 10X rule.

Fig. 2.

Maximum Parsimony tree using COI sequences with bootstrap support (1000 replicates) showing two major clades for Trialeurodes spp., viz., T. vaporariorum, T. abutilonea, T. lauri and T. ricini. Clade I consists of T. ricini (fi01_1086.gif) and T. lauri (fi02_1086.gif), and Clade II consists of T. vaporariorum (fi03_1086.gif) and T. abutilonea (fi04_1086.gif). Bemisia tabaci (fi05_1086.gif) was used as an out group in the analysis. Gp-I and Gp-II are the two new groups of T. ricini cryptic species/biotypes, according to Hebert's barcoding gap of 10X interspetific-to-intraspecific distances.

f02_1086.jpg

Our study indisputably proved that T. vaporariorum is a single species, and unlike B. tabaci species complex. Also the phylogram showed that T. vaporariorum is more closely related to T. abutilonea than to T. ricini and T. lauri, which formed the second clade in the phylogram (Fig. 2). This is a much needed starting point with reference to the molecular identification of the greenhouse whitefly, T. vaporariorum, and to further attempts to determine if biotypes or cryptic species occur in this globally distributed species.

ENDNOTE

This paper is a part of doctoral degree work of the senior author. Financial support received for the Out Reach Programme on Management of Sucking pests in Horticultural Crops, from the Indian Council for Agricultural Research (ICAR), New Delhi is gratefully acknowledged. We are also grateful for support given by Dr. Sundararaj, whitefly taxonomist (IWST) and K. Y. Arun Kumar for the present study. We sincerely thank the anonymous reviewers whose critical comments helped in improving the paper.

REFERENCES CITED

1.

V. R. Alba 1950. Viropatógenos, pp. 52–58 In Conferencia Latinoamericana de Especialistas en Papa. Bogota. Colombia. Google Scholar

2.

S. L. Ball , and K. F. Armstrong 2006. DNA barcodes for insect pest identification: a test case with tussock moths (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Canadian J. Forest Res. 36:337–350. Google Scholar

3.

I. D. Bedford , R. Briddon , J. K. Brown , R. C. Rosell , and P. G. Markham 1994. Geminivirus-transmission and biological characterisation of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) biotypes from different geographic regions. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 125: 311–325. Google Scholar

4.

J. Bird 1957. A whitefly transmitted mosaic Jatropha gossypifolia. Technical Paper, Agricultural Experiment Station, Puerto Rico 22: 1–35. Google Scholar

5.

J. Bird , and K. Maramorosch 1978. Viruses and virus diseases associated with whiteflies. Adv. Virus Res. 71: 233–260. Google Scholar

6.

P. A. Brown 1997. A review of techniques used in the preparation, curation and conservation of microscope slides at The Natural History Museum, London. Special Supplement, The Biology Curator, Issue 10. 33 pp. Google Scholar

7.

P. C. Brunner , E. K. Chatzivassilious , N. I. Katis , and J. E. Frey 2004. Host-associated genetic differentiation in Thrips tabaci (Insecta: Thysanoptera), as determined from mtDNA sequence data. Heredity 93: 364–370. Google Scholar

8.

D. N. Byrne , T. S. Bellows , and M. P. Parrella 1990. Whiteflies in agricultural systems, pp. 227–261 In D. Gerling [ed.], Whiteflies: their bionomics, pest status and management. Intercept Ltd, Andover, MA. Google Scholar

9.

A. S. Costa , and L. M. Russell 1975. Failure of Bemisia tabaci to breed on cassava plants in Brazil (Homoptera: Aleyroideae). Cienc. Cult. 27: 390–399. Google Scholar

10.

P. J. De Barro , F. Driver , J. H. Trueman , and J. Curran 2000: Phylogenetic relationships of world populations of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) using ribosomal ITSl. Mol. Phyl Evol. 16(1): 29–36. Google Scholar

11.

P. J. De Barro , S,-S. Liu , L. M. Boykin , and A. B. Dinsdale 2011. Bemisia tabaci: A Statement of Species Status Annu. Rev. Entomol. 56: 1–19. Google Scholar

12.

L. Denholm , M. Cahill , F. J. Byrne , and A. L. Devonshire 1996. Progress with documenting and combating insecticide resistance in Bemisia , pp. 577–603 In D. Gerling and R. T. Mayer [eds.], Bemisia: 1995 Taxonomy, Biology, Damage, Control and Management. Intercept, Andover, MA. Google Scholar

13.

I. Denholm , M. Cahill , T. J. Dennehy , and A. R. Horowitz 1998. Challenges with managing insecticide resistance in agricultural pests, exemplified by the whitefly Bemisia tabaci. Philos, Trans. Roy. Soc. London Ser. B 353: 1757–1767 Google Scholar

14.

J. E. Duffus 1965. Beet pseudo-yellows virus, transmitted by the greenhouse whitefly (Trialeurodes vaporariorum). Phytopathology 55: 450–453. Google Scholar

15.

J. C. Faria , M. N. Oliveira , and M. Yokoyama 1994. Resposta comparativa de genótipos de feijoeiro (Phaseolus vulgaris) a inoculação com o vírus do mosaico dourado no estágio de plâ;ntulas. Fitopatol. Brasileira 19: 566–572. Google Scholar

16.

O. Folmer , M. Black , W. Hoeh , R. Lutz , and R. Vrijen-Hoek 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome C oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol. Marine Biol. Biotechnol. 3: 294–299. Google Scholar

17.

R. J. Gill 1992. A review of the sweetpotato whitefly in southern California. Pan-Pacif. Entomol. 68: 144. Google Scholar

18.

P. D. N. Hebert , E. H. Penton , J. M. Burns , D. H. Janzen , and W. Hallwachs 2004. Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 14812–14817. Google Scholar

19.

J. P. Huelsenbeck , and F. Ronquist 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754–755. Google Scholar

20.

J. P. Huelsenbeck , and F. Ronquist 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572–1574. Google Scholar

21.

M. Idriss , N. Abdallah , N. Aref , G. Haridy , and M. Madkour 1997. Biotypes of the castor bean whitefly Trialeurodes ricini (Misra) (Horn., Aleyrodidae) in Egypt: biochemical characterization and efficiency of geminivirus transmission. J. Appl. Entomol. 121: 501–509. Google Scholar

22.

J. H. Martin 1987. An identification guide to common whitefly pest species of the world (Homoptera, Aleyrodidae). Trop. Pest Mgt. 33: 298–322. Google Scholar

23.

L. A. Mound 1963. Host-correlated variation in Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Homoptera: Aleyroideae). Proc. R. Entomol. Soc. Lond. 38: 171–180. Google Scholar

24.

L. A. Mound , and S. H. Halsey 1978. Whitefly of the world: A systematic catalogue of the Aleyrodidae (Homoptera) with host plant and natural enemy data. British Mus. Nat. Hist. Chichester. 340 pp. Google Scholar

25.

T. M. Perring 2001. The Bemisia tabaci species complex. Crop Prot. 20: 725–737. Google Scholar

26.

D. Posada , and K. A. Crandall 1998. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817–818. Google Scholar

27.

A. Rambaut 2009. FigTree version 1.3.1. University of Edinburgh,  http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/  Google Scholar

28.

M. A. Saghai Maroof , K. M. Solima , R. A. Jorgenson , and R. W. Allard 1984. Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphisms in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81: 8014–8018. Google Scholar

29.

C. Simon , F. Frati , B. Crespi , H. Liu , and P. K. Floor 1994. Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved PCR primers. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 87:651–701. Google Scholar

30.

D. L. Swofford 1998. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (* and Other Methods). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA. Google Scholar

31.

K. Tamura , J. Dudley , M. Nei , and S. Kumar 2007. MEGA 4: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4. 0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24: 1596–1599. Google Scholar

32.

J. D. Thompson , T. J. Gibson , F. Plewniak , F. Jeanmougin , and D. G. Higgins 1997. The ClustaIX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 24: 4876–4882. Google Scholar

33.

S. Toda , and T. Murai 2007. Phylogenetic analysis based on mitochondrial COI gene sequences in Thrips tabaci Lindeman (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in relation to reproductive forms and geographical distribution. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 42: 309–316. Google Scholar

34.

I. E. Tzanetakis , and R. R. Martin 2004a. First report of Beet pseudoyellows virus in blackberry in the United States. Plant Disease 88: 223. Google Scholar

35.

I. E. Tzanetakis , W. M. Wintermantel , and R. R. Martin 2003. First report of Beet pseudo yellow virus in strawberry in the United States: A second crinivirus able to cause pallidosis disease. Plant Disease 87: 1398. Google Scholar

36.

G. C. Wisler , J. E. Duffus , H. Y. Liu , and R. H. Li 1998a. Ecology and epidemiology of whitefly-transmitted closteroviruses. Plant Disease 82: 270–280. Google Scholar

37.

G. C Wisler , R. H. Li , H. Y. Liu , D. S. Lowry , and J. E. Duffus 1998b. Tomato chlorosis virus: a new whitefly-transmitted, phloem-limited, bipartite closterovirus of tomato. Phytopathology 88: 402–409. Google Scholar
H. K. Roopa, N. K. Krishna Kumar, R. Asokan, K. B. Rebijith, Riaz Mahmood, and Abraham Verghese "Phylogenetic Analysis of Trialeurodes Spp. (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) from India Based on Differences in Mitochondrial and Nuclear Dna," Florida Entomologist 95(4), 1086-1094, (1 December 2012). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.095.0438
Published: 1 December 2012
KEYWORDS
biotipos
biotypes
codificar bandas de ADN
Crinivirus
Criniviruses
cryptic species
DNA barcoding
Back to Top