Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 June 2013 Closely Related Wolbachia (Rickettsiales: Rickettsiaceae) Recovered from Different Genera of Mexican Thelytokous Figitidae (Hymenoptera)
Andrew Davies, John Sivinski, Paul Shirk, Martin Aluja
Author Affiliations +

Thelytoky in hymenopteran parasitoids is often the result of infection with intracellular endosymbionts, especially the bacterium Wolbachia pipientis (Rickettsiales: Rickettsiaceae) (Werren et al. 2008). The transition from arrhenotoky to thelytoky is due either to prevention of chromosome reduction during meiosis or through the postmeiotic fusion of 2 haploid mitotic products. As a result haploidy is eliminated and adults are all diploid females that can vertically pass the bacteria to offspring in the abundant cytoplasm of their ova (Werren et al. 2008). Wolbachia phylogenies, unlike those of mitochondria, often diverge considerably from those of their eukaryotic hosts (e.g., Bandi et al. 1998). This implies infections are not derived through common descent but are passed from species to species by other means (Werren et al. 1996). Such horizontal transfers can be accomplished by multiparasitism (Huigens et al. 2000; Huigens & Stouthamer 2003), via infected hosts (Heath et al. 1999; Caspi-Fluger et al. 2012) and perhaps intimate contacts in a shared habitat; e.g., Wolbachia from Diptera feeding on mushrooms are more similar than those found in non-mushroom feeding flies (Stahlhut et al. 2010).

Odontosema anastrephae Borgmeier (Figitidae) is a neotropical/subtropical parasitoid of Anastrepha spp. fruit fly larvae that forages inside fallen fruit, especially guavas (Psidium spp.) (Wharton et al. 1998; López et al. 1999). It has been proposed as a candidate for augmentative releases because of its capacity to search for pest larvae deep in the pulp, an ability not shared by other native non-figitid parasitoids of tephritids in Mexico (Aluja et al. 2009). Thelytokous O. anastrephae females are morphologically indistinguishable from arrhenotokous females (Copeland et al. 2010). PCR amplification and sequencing of mitochondrial (COI) and nuclear (ITS2) DNA found thelytokous and arrhenotokous laboratory colonies to be genetically distinct, but no more so than often occurs among populations of completely arrhenotokous species (Copeland et al. 2010). Aganaspis alujai Ovruski et al. (Figitidae) is a parasitoid of Rhagoletis spp. infesting walnuts (Juglans spp.; Fagales: Juglandaceae). Only females of this univoltine species have ever been collected (Ovruski et al. 2007).

We here examined both thelytokous and arrhenotokous O. anastrephae and A. alujai for Wolbachia infection using multilocus sequence typing and through assessment of the DNA sequence alignments, then determined the phylogenetic relationships amongst the bacteria identified. Many previous genetic characterizations of Wolbachia have been accomplished by analysis of the wsp gene, however, it is now known that wsp has relatively high levels of recombination and is under strong selection for divergence (Baldo et al. 2006a). Therefore, it may not be as suitable for comparing genetic similarity and phylogenetic reconstructions as multilocus sequence typing (MLST) (Baldo et al. 2006b). All nucleotide sequences reported herein were submitted to GenBank.

For origin and specialist morphological identification of O. anastrephae cultures see Copeland et al. (2010). Thelytokous (T) and arrhenotokous (A) O. anastrephae colonies from the Instituto de Ecologia, A. C., Xalapa, Mexico, where each strain has been in culture since 2000, were imported into quarantine at the USDA-ARS Center for Medical, Agricultural, and Veterinary Entomology in Gainesville, Florida. Subsequently from 2009 to 2011, the parasitoids were reared on Caribbean fruit fly larvae, Anastrepha suspensa (Lowe) (Tephritidae) in an environmental chamber at 25 ± 1 °C, 16:8 h L:D and 75% RH. Iso-female T and A lines of O. anastrephae were established and maintained for 2 generations prior to their use in experiments, all of which were conducted under the above environmental conditions. The specimens of A. alujai were obtained in nature from Veracruz State, Mexico and immediately preserved in 100% ethanol.

For DNA extraction, individual specimens were placed singly in 60 mL of 5% Chelex buffer with 4 mL of proteinase K (0.5mg/mL) and crushed with a clean plastic pestle before being incubated at 56 °C for 2 h. Homogenates were then boiled at 99 °C for 3 min to inactivate proteinase K and were used as templates for PCR.

Wolbachia infection status of each female used to establish the iso-female experimental lines was confirmed using PCR of the wsp gene (wsp 81F 5′- TGGTCCAATAAGTGATGAAGAAAC-3′ and wsp 691R 5′-AAAAATTAAACGCTACTCCA-3′, ex Zhou et al. 1998; Braig et al. 1998) using the following cycling protocol: 60 s at 92 °C and then 35 cycles of 60 s at 92 °C, 60 s at 55 °C and a 90 s extension at 72 °C, with a final extension of 90 s at 72 °C : in a MJ Mini™ thermal cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, California). Each PCR consisted of 33 mL: 2 mL template DNA, 16.5 µl of AmpliTaq Gold PCR Master Mix (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California), 1.3 mL of each 10 pmol µL-1 primers and 13.9 mL of sterile water. The specificity of the reactions was confirmed by the lack of product in reactions containing DNA template from females of the O. anastrephae A-iso strain or no DNA template.

In order to assess the presence of other bacteria, primers for 16S eubacterial DNA for (27F 5′-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3′ and 1513R 5′- ACGGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′, ex Weisburg et al. 1991) were used to produce PCR products from the T iso-female DNA template (following Weeks et al. 2003). PCR products were purified using the Wizard® SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up System (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin) then cloned into a pCR®II-TOPO vector utilizing TOP10 competent cells (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California). Plasmid DNA from 10 colonies derived from each PCR product were prepared using a Zyppy™Plasmid Miniprep Kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, California) before being sequenced using T7 primer by Macrogen Corporation (Rockville, Maryland). This experiment was then repeated with 10 further colonies each sequenced with both T3 (Macrogen) and T7 primers to obtain longer reads. Wsp sequences were aligned using ClustalW (Thompson et al. 1994) in MEGA4 (Tamura et al. 2007) to check for multiple infections. The resulting nucleotide sequences were queried using BlastN against the nucleotide database from NCBI ( http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) to identify homologous sequences.

T iso-female wsp and MLST gene sequences were amplified using standard primers and PCR protocols (available at  http://www.pubmlst.org/wolbachia/). The Wolbachia strain was then assigned a sequence type (ST), which was the combination of 5 integers corresponding to the allele numbers at the 5 MLST loci (the allelic profile). No amplification products were observed for wsp or MLST from the A-iso females. Strain and host information is available on the MLST database ( http://pubmlst.org/wolbachia/).

The phylogenetic relationship between the Wolbachia extracted from T iso-female O. anastrephae- Wolbachia and other Wolbachia strains was examined based on concatenated MLST gene nucleotide sequences. Alignments of the MLST sequences were performed using ClustalW in MEGA4. The phylogenetic associations were constructed in MEGA5, using the Neighbor-Joining method (Saitou & Nei 1987) with Kimura's 2-parameter correction (Kimura 1980) with boot-strapping (1000 replicates) and MLST sequences from the nematode, Brugia malayi (Brug) (Spirurida: Onchoceridae), and Cimex lectularius L.(Hemiptera: Cimicidae) as outgroups.

As per Copeland et al. (2010), we found that based on the wsp sequences the thelytokous and arrhenotokous iso-female O. anastrephae experimental lines were Wolbachia infected and uninfected, respectively. Subsequent generations were tested for infection using the same method and with the same and consistent results. Seven 536 bp nucleotide sequences (GenBank accession numbers JX182373 – JX182379), from clones of the T iso-female wsp PCR product, were identical, suggesting the original specimen used to establish the T iso-female line was infected with a single strain of Wolbachia, wAna. Based on the wsp and MLST sequences from the wAna strain showed it to be included in Supergroup A.

As determined by comparisons of 16S sequences, no other bacteria strains were identified in O. anastrephae. Thirteen 16S sequences derived from T iso-female template DNA(JX182380 – JX182392) closely matched rRNA nucleotide sequences previously derived from Wolbachia (98 – 100% coverage) when queried with BlastN against the nucleotide database from NCBI ( http://www.ncbi.nim.nih.gov/) to identify homologous sequences.

None of the sequences of the wsp hypervariable regions (HVR) from wAna were different from those sequences previously reported in the Wolbachia MLST database (HVRl = 11, HVR2 = 9, HVR3 = 15, HVR4 = 25). However, as combined in wAna they presented a novel wsp profile (Wolbachia MLST database id 522, JX182393). The wsp profile was identical to that of the Wolbachia strain wAlu, infecting another thelytokous figitid parasitoid of tephritids, A. alujai (JX182394). However, the MLST profiles for wAna and wAlu were not the same. The novel MLST profile of wAna (Wolbachia MLST database ST 165 = gatB 54, JX182397; coxA 52, JX182395; hcpA 62, JX182399; ftsZ 3, JX182401; fbpA 164, JX182403) contained a unique fbpA isolate (fbpA 164). The wAna MLST profile was essentially the same as that in wAlu (ST 164 = gatB 54, JX182398; coxA 52, JX182396; hcpA 62, JX182400; ftsZ 82, JX182402; fbpA 62, JX182404), but also contained a different ftsZ sequence (ftsZ 82).

A phylogenetic analysis of the concatenated MLST sequences from wAna (ST 165) and wAlu (ST 164) showed them to be closely aligned and within Supergroup A (Fig. 1). ST 23 (Baldo et al. 2006b) from the only other closely related Wolbachia strain in this analysis is known to induce thelytoky in its host, Muscidifurax uniraptor Kogan & Legner (Gottlieb & Zchori-Fein 2001, Fig 1).

Fig. 1.

Neighbor joining phylogenetic tree constructed using concatenated multi-locus sequence types (ST's) of Wolbachia strains with Kimura's 2-parameter correction, bootstrap testing (1000 replications) and ST-35 (ex Brugia malayi) and ST-8 (ex Cimex lectularius) as outgroups. Wolbachia Supergroup designations are provided. Numbers next to branches indicate bootstrap values greater than 70% and the tree is drawn to scale (given), with branch length units the same as the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogeny. ST-165 (ex Odontosema anastrephae) is in large bold text with other novel ST's (ST- 164 ex Aganaspis alujai and ST-187 ex Diaphorencyrtus aligarhensis) in large text only.

f01_649.jpg

Thelytoky in O. anastrephae and A. alujai may have been, but was not proven to be, due to the Wolbachia infections detected by molecular means (Copeland et al. 2010). Thelytokous females of both O. anastrephae and A. alujai were infected while bisexual O. anastrephae were not. There was no genetic evidence of other endosymbionts that might cause sex-ratio distortion.

The nearly identical Wolbachia infecting O. anastrephae and A. alujai raises the question of how such similar endosymbionts came to occupy such different parasitoids. To our knowledge, there are no published records of these 2 different wasps attacking the same tephritids, foraging in the same host fruit or sharing hosts and microhabitats with another parasitoid that could have carried the bacteria and so acted as a bridge and provide a vehicle for the horizontal transfer of Wolbachia between O. anastrephae and A. alujai. If the similarity of their Wolbachia is due to common descent then there must have been an unusual degree of genomic conservation (stabilizing selection in both bacteria populations) that left the bacteria nearly identical while their hosts diverged to the point of becoming members of different genera.

We thank Charlie Stuhl, Heidi Burnside, Marc Schetelig, Nirmala Xavier, Al Handler, Jeff Shapiro, Paul Shirk and Kristie Morris for technical support and in Mexico Larrisa Guillen, Andrea Birke and Juan Rull for supplying parasitoids. This research was funded by a USDA-ARS Post-doctoral Fellowship.

SUMMARY

Closely related novel Wolbachia strains were recovered from the thelytokous figitids, Odontosema anastrephae Borgmeier and Aganaspis alujai Ovruski et al. No Wolbachia were detected in a bi-sexual strain of O. anastrephae. While the presence or absence of Wolbachia does not demonstrate that Wolbachia is responsible for the lack of males produced by infected females, multilocus sequence typing failed to identify other endosymbionts that might have caused sex-ratio distortions. The phylogenies of insects and their Wolbachia are often not parallel and closely related bacteria infecting apparently more distantly related hosts suggests a horizontal transfer occurred after the divergence of the wasps. Given the figitids present ecology there are few obvious opportunities for transfer through host or habitat-sharing.

Key Words: Aganaspis, Odontosema, Anastrepha, Rhagoletis, biological control

RESUMEN

Se recuperaron nuevas cepas de Wolbachia estrechamente relacionadas dentro de los figitidos telitoquios, Odontosema anastrephae Borgmeier y Aganaspis alujai Ovruski et al. No se detectó Wolbachia en una cepa bi-sexual de O. anastrephae. Mientras que la presencia o ausencia de Wolbachia no demuestra que Wolbachia es responsable por la falta de machos producidos por hembras infectadas, la tipificación de secuencia multilocus no identificó otros endosimbiontes que podrían haber causado las distorsiones en la proportion de sexos. Las filogenias de los insectos y su Wolbachia a menudo no son paralelas y bacterias estrechamente relacionadas que infectan hospederos aparentemente más distantes sugiere que la transferencia horizontal sucedió después de la divergencia de las avispas. Teniendo en cuenta la ecología actual de los figitidos, hay pocas oportunidades obvias para su transferencia por medio del hospedero o el habitat compartido.

Palabras Clave: Aganaspis, Odontosema, Anastrepha, Rhagoletis, control biológico

REFERENCES CITED

1.

M. Aluja , S. Ovruski , L. Guillen , L. OroÑO , and J. Sivinski 2009. Comparison of the host searching and oviposition behaviors of the tephritid (Diptera) parasitoids Aganaspis pelleranoi and Odontosema anastrephae (Hymenoptera: Figitidae, Eucoilinae) J. Insect Behav. 22: 423–451. Google Scholar

2.

L. Baldo , S. Bordenstein , J. Wernegreen , and J. Werren 2006a. Wide-spread recombination throughout Wolbachia genomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23: 437–449. Google Scholar

3.

L. Baldo , J. Dunning-Hotopp , K. Jolley , S. Bordenstein , S. Biber , R. Choudhury , C. Hayashi , M. Maiden , H. Tettelin , and J. Werren 2006b. Multilocus sequence typing system for the endosymbiont Wolbachia pipientis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 7098– 7110. Google Scholar

4.

C. Bandi , T. Anderson , C. Genchi , and M. Blaxter 1998. Phylogeny of Wolbachia in filarial nematodes. Proc. R. Soc. London B: Biol. Sci. 265: 1–7. Google Scholar

5.

H. Braig , W. Zhou , S. Dobson , and S. O'Neill 1998. Cloning and characterization of gene encoding the major surface protein of the bacterial endosymbiont Wolbachia pipientis. J. Bacteriol. 180: 2373–8. Google Scholar

6.

A. Caspi-Fluger , M. Inbar , N. Mozes-Daube , N. Katzir , V. Portnoy , E. Belausov , M. S. Hunter , and E. Zchori-Fein 2012. Horizontal transmission of the plant symbiont Rickettsia is plant-mediated. Proc. R. Soc. London B: Biol. Sci. 279(1734): 1791–1796. Google Scholar

7.

C. Copeland , M. Hoy , A. Jeyaprakash , M. Aluja , R. Rameriz-Romero , and J. Sivinski 2010. Genetic characteristics of bisexual and female-only populations of Odontosema anastrephae (Hymenoptera: Figitidae). Florida Entomol. 93: 437–443. Google Scholar

8.

M. Giorgini , U. Bernardo , M. Monti , A. Nappo , and M. Gebiola 2010. Rickettsia symbionts cause parthenogenetic reproduction in the parasitoid wasp Pnigalio soemius (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76(8): 2589–2599. Google Scholar

9.

S. Goodacre , and O. Martin 2012. Modification of insect and arachnid behaviors by vertically transmitted endosymbionts: infections as drivers of behavioral change and evolutionary novelty. Insects 3: 246–261. Google Scholar

10.

Y. Gottlieb , and E. Zchori-Fein 2001. Irreversible thelytokous reproduction in Muscidifurax uniraptor. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 100: 271–278. Google Scholar

11.

B. Heath , R. Butcher , W. Whitfield , and S. Hubbard 1999. Horizontal transfer of Wolbachia between phylogenetically distant insect species by a naturally occurring mechanism. Current Biol. 9: 313–316. Google Scholar

12.

M. Huigens , and R. Stouthamer 2003. Parthenogenesis associated with Wolbachia , pp. 247–266 In K. Bourtzis and T. Miller [eds.], Insect Symbiosis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. Google Scholar

13.

M. Huigens , R. Luck , R. Klaassen , M. Mass , M. Timmerman , and R. Stouthamer 2000. Infectious parthenogenesis. Nature 405: 178–179. Google Scholar

14.

M. Kmura 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16: 111–120. Google Scholar

15.

M. Lopez , M. Aluja , and J. Sivinski 1999. Hymenopterous larval-pupal and pupal parasitoids of Anastrepha flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Mexico. Biological Contr. 15: 119–129. Google Scholar

16.

S. Ovruski , R. Wharton , J. Rull , and L. Guillen 2007. Aganaspis alujai (Hymenoptera: Figitidae: Eucoilinae), a new species attacking Rhagoletis (Diptera: Tephritidae) in the neotropical region. Florida Entomol. 90: 626–634. Google Scholar

17.

B. Pannebakker , B. Zwaan , Beukeboom , and J. L. Van Alphen 2004. Genetic diversity and Wolbachia infection of the Drosophila parasitoid Leptopilina clavipes in western Europe. Mol. Ecol. 13: 1119–1128. Google Scholar

18.

R DEVELOPMENT CORE TEAM. 2004. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. URL  http://www.R-project.org Google Scholar

19.

R. Rameriz-Romero , J. Sivinski , C. Copeland , and M. Aluja 2012. Are individuals from thelytokous and arrhenotokous populations equally adept as biocontrol agents? Orientation and host searching behavior of a fruit fly parasitoid. BioControl 57(3): 427–440. Google Scholar

20.

B. Reumer , J. Van Alphen , and K. Kraaijeveld 2010. Ecology, Wolbachia infection frequency and mode of reproduction in the parasitoid wasp Tetrastichus coeruleus (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Mol. Ecol. 19: 1733–1744. Google Scholar

21.

N. Saitou , and M. Nei 1987. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4: 406–425. Google Scholar

22.

J. Stahlhut , C. Desjardins , M. Clark , L. Baldo , J. Russell , J. Werren , and J. Jaenike 2010. The mushroom habitat as an ecological arena for global exchange of Wolbachia. Mol. Ecol. 19: 1940–1952. Google Scholar

23.

R. Stouthamer , J. Pinto , G. Platner , and R. Luck 1990. Taxonomic status of thelytokous forms of Trichogramma (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 83: 475–481. Google Scholar

24.

K. Tamura , J. Dudley , M. Nei , and S. Kumar 2007. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) Software Version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24: 1596–1599. Google Scholar

25.

J. Thompson , D. Higgins , and T. Gibson 1994. ClustalW: Improving the sensitivity of progressive sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22: 4673–4680 Google Scholar

26.

F. Vavre , F. Fleury , D. Lepetit , P. Fouillet , and M. Bouletreau 1999. Phylogenetic evidence for horizontal transmission of Wolbachia in host-parasitoid associations. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16: 1711–1723. Google Scholar

27.

A. Weeks , R. Velten , and R. Stouthamer 2003. Incidence of a new sex-ratio-distorting endosymbiotic bacterium among arthropods. Proc. R. Soc. London B: Biol. Sci. 270: 1857–1865. Google Scholar

28.

W. Weisburg , S. Barns , D. Pelletier , and D. Lane 1991. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J. Bacteriol. 173: 697–703. Google Scholar

29.

J. Werren , L. Baldo , and M. Clark 2008. Wolbachia: master manipulators of invertebrate biology. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6(10): 741–751. Google Scholar

30.

J. Werren , W. Zhang , and L. Guo 1995. Evolution and phylogeny of Wolbachia: reproductive parasites of arthropods. Proc. R. Soc. London B: Biol. Sci. 26: 55–71. Google Scholar

31.

R. Wharton , S. Ovruski , and F. Gilstrap 1998. Neotropical Eucoilidae (Cynipoidea) associated with fruit infesting Tephritidae, with new records from Argentina, Bolivia and Costa Rica. J. Hymenoptera Res. 7: 102–115. Google Scholar

32.

W. Zhou , F. Rousset , and S. O'Neil 1998. Phylogeny and PCR-based classification of Wolbachia strains using wsp gene sequences. Proc. R. Soc. London B: Biol. Sci. 265: 509–515. Google Scholar
Andrew Davies, John Sivinski, Paul Shirk, and Martin Aluja "Closely Related Wolbachia (Rickettsiales: Rickettsiaceae) Recovered from Different Genera of Mexican Thelytokous Figitidae (Hymenoptera)," Florida Entomologist 96(2), 649-653, (1 June 2013). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.096.0238
Published: 1 June 2013
Back to Top