Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
1 June 2013 A New Genus and Species of Asteraceae-Inhabiting Aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) from Costa Rica and Mexico
M. Pilar Mier Durante, Nicolás Pérez Hidalgo, David Martínez-Torres, Sergio García-Tejero, Rebeca Peña Martínez, Juan M. Nieto Nafría
Author Affiliations +

Ucrimyzus villalobosi Mier Durante & Pérez Hidalgo gen. n., sp. n. (Hemiptera: Aphididae: Macrosiphini) are described from apterous and alate viviparous females collected on species of genera Bidens, Schkuhria, Senecio and Stevia (Asteraceae: Asteroideae) in Costa Rica and Mexico. Principal components analysis (PCA) was done to verify that the studied aphids belong to a single species regardless of their geographical origin or host plant. Molecular analyses were carried out on the sequences of a fragment of the mitochondrial gene encoding for cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI) and of a fragment of the nuclear gene encoding elongation factor 1α (EF1α). The taxonomic discussion takes into account the conclusions of the molecular analyses and the morphologic study compared with other genera of Macrosiphini. The identification keys by Blackman & Eastop (2006) to aphids living on each mentioned plant genus are modified to include the new species.

During expeditions to Costa Rica in 2008, 3 of the authors (M.D., P.H., N.N.) and W. Villalobos (Villalobos Muller et al. 2010) collected apterous and alate viviparous female macrosiphines (Aphididae, Aphidinae, Macrosiphini) on Bidens pilosa (Asteraceae, Asteroideae) in the University of Costa Rica main campus. Additional individuals collected on Bidens, Schkuhria, Senecio and Stevia in several Mexican localities, and kept in the collection génerale d'aphides of the Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (Paris, France), were studied; these specimens had been provisionally identified by the Prof. G. Remaudière as Hyperomyzus sp. and marked as possible new species.

Morphological, statistical (PCA) and molecular (genes COI and EF 1α) studies have been carried out and have shown that (i) the studied specimens belong plausibly to a single species independently from their geographical origin or host plant, and (ii) it is a new species, which can not be included in any known Macrosiphini genus, and so, a new genus and its type species are established.


Ten samples collected in 1 Costa Rican and 6 Mexican localities have been studied (see “Types” section), considering a sample as the group of specimens collected on the same species of plant in a locality on a specific date. Specimens were preserved in microscopic slides with a water-soluble mounting medium (Nieto Nafría & Mier Durante 1998). Aphids for molecular analyses were preserved in 96% ethanol until processing; these individuals were caught together with the holotype on the same plant specimen.

Morphological measurements were made according to Nieto Nafría & Mier Durante (1998). In the description, measurements are lengths except when indicated otherwise as width or diameter.

The comparative morphological study was conducted on species (i) whose apterae possess swollen siphunculi and have been recorded in North America or (ii) are known to feed on Asteroideae species over the World. Specimens belonging to diverse genera presumably related with the new one and also specimens of the most part of American species currently classified Neonasonovia Hille Ris Lambers, 1949 (subgenus of Hyperomyzus Börner 1933), in the collections of the Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (Paris, France) and the Universidad de León (Leon, Spain) were examined. Several taxonomic works, mainly Blackman & Eastop (2006), Blackman (2010), Foottit et al. (1993), Heie (1992, 1994, 1995), Miyazaki (1971), and Nieto Nafría et al. (in press), were consulted.

A Leica DC digital camera with IM 1000 version 1.10 software was used for the photomicrographs.

The variables used in the PCA (principal components analysis) are the metric and meristic characters mentioned in the description of 39 apterous viviparous females; all samples are represented. Variables were standardized to zero mean and unit standard deviation prior to the analysis to give the same weight to all of them.

Molecular phylogenetic analyses were done (i) on a fragment of the mitochondrial DNA containing the 5′ region of the cytochrome c oxidase 1 (COI) and (ii) on a fragment of the nuclear gene coding for elongation factor-1 alpha (EF1α) of 3 specimens of the Costa Rican sample.

DNA extraction was done following the HotSHOT (Hot Sodium HidrOxide and Tris) method (Truett et al. 2000).

PCR amplifications of each mentioned fragment were done on 3 µL of the extracted DNA. A 710 bp fragment of the 5′ region of the COI gene was amplified using primers LCO1490 and HCO2198 described by Folmer et al. (1994). PCR conditions for COI amplification were as follows: 94 °C for 1 min, 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 48 °C for 1 min, and 68 °C for 1 min; a final extension step of 7 min at 68 °C was included after cycling. Amplification of the EF1α fragment was done using 2 consecutive PCR reactions with primers Efs175 (Moran et al. 1999) and Efr1 (5′GTGTGGCAATSCAANACNGGAGT3′) in the first reaction and then primers Efs175 and Efr2 (5′TTGGAAATTTGACCNGGGTGRTT3′) in the second semi-nested reaction. PCR conditions used in the first reaction were 94 °C for 1 min; 40 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 50 °C for 1 min and 68 °C for 1.5 min; a final extension step of 7 min at 68 °C was included after cycling. The semi-nested PCR was done similarly but using 52 °C for the annealing step and 1 µL of the first PCR product.

PCR products were purified by ammonium precipitation and reconstituted in 10 mL of LTE buffer (10 mM Tris, 0.1 mM EDTA). Direct sequencing of the amplified fragments was done on both directions using PCR primers (Efr2 was used as reverse primer for sequencing the EF1α fragment). Sequencing was conducted using the Big Dye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems) following manufacturer's instructions, and samples were loaded into an ABI 3700 automated sequencer.

Chromatograms were revised and sequences assembled using the Staden package v1.6.0 (Bonfield et al. 1995). Multiple alignments were done with Clustal X v1.81 (Larkin et al. 2007) with gap opening and gap extension penalties of 10.0 and 0.2, respectively.

Molecular phylogenetic analyses were conducted using MEGA 5 (Tamura et al. 2011).


Ucrimyzus villalobosi Mier Durante and Pérez Hidalgo, gen. n., sp. n.

  • The combined description of the new species and new genus is made under article 13.4 of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, 1999).

  • Type species of Ucrimyzus gen. n. Ucrimyzus villalobosi sp. n.

  • Types of Ucrimyzus villalobosi sp. n.

  • HOLOTYPE: Apterous viviparous female number 4 of sample CRI-344: COSTA RICA, San Jose province, San Pedro de Montes de Oca, campus Mier Durante et al.: Ucrimyzus villalobosi, a New Aphid Genus and Species 325 de la Universidad de Costa Rica (1214 m), Bidens pilosa, 1-III-2008, Pérez Hidalgo leg., colección zoológica de la Universidad de León [CZULE], Leon (Spain). Paratypes: 42 alate [al.] and 65 apterous [ap.] viviparous females (CZULE, Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris, France, and Natural History Museum, London, U. K.): 3 al. and 17 ap. caught at same time as the holotype; 2 al. and 2 ap., MEXICO, Aguas Calientes state, Pabellon de Arteaga (1904 m), Schkuhria anthemoidea, 7-IX-1981, Adame leg.; 4 al. and 2 ap., MEXICO, Durango state, El Salto (ouest) (2600 m), Bidens sp., 18-X-1980, Remaudière & Peña Martínez leg.; 1 al., MEXICO, Mexico state, Chapingo, Bidens pilosa (2250 m), 18-IX-1979, Remaudière leg.; 4 al. and 2 ap., MEXICO, Guanajuato state, San Miguel de Allende (2000 m), 8-X-1980, Remaudière & Peña Martínez leg.; 1 ap., MEXICO, Durango state, Durango (10 km west) (2200 m), Senecio sp., 17-X-1980, Remaudière & Peña Martínez leg.; 1 ap., MEXICO, Durango state, Durango (10 km west) (2200 m), Stevia sp., 17-X-1980, Remaudière & Peña Martínez leg.; 2 al. and 11 ap., MEXICO, Queretaro state, Caderyta (2010 m), Schkuhria virgata, 7-X-1980; 26 al. and 29 ap., MEXICO, Veracruz state, Cumbres de Maltrata (ouest Santa Rosa) (1750 m), Bidens sp., 28-IV-1979, Remaudière leg..

  • Etymologies and Genus Name Gender

    Ucrimyzus is a noun formed with “UCR” and “myzus” plus the thematic vowel “i” to facilitate pronunciation. “UCR” is the acronym of Universidad de Costa Rica, the former University in Costa Rica, and “myzus” forms part of the name of many aphid genera that present more or less close similarities to Myzus. The gender of Ucrimyzus is masculine following the gender of Myzus. The specific name villalobosi is a noun in apposition in case genitive, in gratitude to William Villalobos Muller (University of Costa Rica) for his work improving the Costa Rican aphid fauna knowledge.

    Apterous Viviparous Females. Fig. 1. Based on 66 Specimens.

    Color in life dull pale green, with yellowish appendages and siphunculi. Body 1.65–2.45 mm including cauda.

    Head. Pale-brown; cuticular ornamentation reduced to fine and scattered striae. Frontal margin undulated and frontal tubercles rounded; lateral tubercles divergent and low, but bigger than the medial. Dorsal setae with rounded apex, 15–17 µm and 0.42–0.70 times the basal diameter of the antennal segment III [henceforth D]; ventral setae pointed and similar in size. Ventral margin of the antennal socket with a striate protuberance. Antennae are 1.75–2.62 mm and 0.93–1.28 times the body length. Antennal segments I and II pale brown and delicately rugous on the inner margin. Antennal segment III 0.41–0.70 mm and 1.1–2.1 times IV, pale brown (on a proximal portion) to dark brown, with scales (ventrally on paler portion) and striae, blunt setae 7–15 µm and 0.2–0.6 times D, and 1–20 secondary sensoria with double-lined and non-ciliate margin placed in a ventral line of the basal third of the segment. Antennal segments IV to VI brown to dark brown and imbricated; IV, 0.25–0.50 mm; V, 0.23–0.37 mm; processus terminalis of VI 0.55–0.82 mm, 0.9–1.7 times antennal segment III and 5.3–8.2 times base, which is 0.09–0.12 mm. Rostrum as pigmented as head, smooth and reaching the hind coxae. Ultimate rostral segment triangular with straight margins, 0.12–0.14 mm, 1.8–2.9 times its basal diameter, 1.1–1.4 times base of the antennal segment VI and 1.1–1.3 times second tarsal segment of the hind legs; with 3–6 accessory setae, which are 12–20 µm and 0.50–0.66 times D.

    Thorax. Membranous, very pale and with pale spiracular and inconspicuous intersegmental sclerites. Prothorax with 2 spinal and 2 pairs of marginal setae, similar to other dorsal setae in shape and size; spiracular apertures rounded and only slightly wider than those on the abdomen. Coxae, trochanters pale brown, femora basad pale brown and darkening to the apex, tibiae brown to dark brown, tarsi dark brown. Femur and tibia of the hind legs 0.58–0.81 and 0.97–1.50 mm, respectively. Second tarsal segment of hind legs 0.10–0.12 mm. Setae on femora scattered, blunt and short, those on hind legs are 12–18 µm and 0.41–0.60 times D. Setae on basal part of tibiae like the femoral ones, others are pointed and longer than those (20–25 µm and 0.61–1.0 times D). First tarsal segments with 3 setae.

    Abdomen. Membranous, with small and unpigmented intersegmental and spiracular sclerites, pale but rugous postsiphuncular sclerites, and sometimes marginal sclerites on segments VII and VIII also pale and rugous or with spinules. Spiracular apertures subcircular to reniform. Papillae absent. Dorsal setae on anterior segments blunt, 8–10 per segment, 7–12 µm and 0.2–0.4 times D. Ventral setae pointed, more numerous and 12–30 µm. Abdominal segment VIII with 4–6 setae, 8–20 µm and 0.2–0.8 times D. Siphunculi asymmetrically swollen (outer edge is almost straight), with broad base and well-defined preapical incision and flange; 0.37–0.50 mm and 0.18–0.25 times body length; 4.7–5.3 times diameter at base (0.075–0.100 mm), 6.8–11.5 times diameter of peduncle at middle (0.03–0.07 mm) and 5.0–8.3 times greatest diameter of swollen part (0.06–0.09 mm); pigmented like femora and darkening apically; mostly smooth, with striae on incision and few striae or wrinkles on peduncle. Genital plate pale, with 2 discal and 6–12 posterior setae, all of them with pointed apex. Anal plate and cauda pale brown, paler than siphunculi. Cauda lanceolate, 0.21–0.34 mm, 1.6–2.6 times its basal width, 0.60–0.74 times the siphunculus, and carrying 5–7 fine, curved and pointed setae.

    Fig. 1.

    Apterous viviparous female: A, habitus; B, head; C, III antennal segment; D, dorsal seta on III abdominal segment; E, setae on hind tibiae.


    Alate Viviparous Females. Fig. 2. Based on 42 Specimens.

    Identical to apterae in qualitative, metric and meristic features, including the ranges of these last two, except the following ones: those being properly alatae (e.g. pterothorax), slightly more pigmented legs and sometimes antennae, pale brown marginal and sometimes spiracular abdominal sclerites, and 25–43 scattered secondary sensoria on antennal segment IV, 5–19 aligned ones on segment IV and 0–2 on segment V. The wing venation is not noticeably.

    Bionomics. Aphids of this species form dense colonies on the stems of plants of genera Bidens, Schkuhria, Senecio and Stevia, and perhaps of other species belonging to subfamily Asteroideae (Asteraceae). Nothing is known regarding host alternation or lack thereof.

    Fig. 2.

    Alate viviparous female: A, habitus; B, III antennal segment; C, IV and V antennal segments.


    Geographical Distribution

    Collection data from Costa Rica and high altitude localities in Central Mexico indicate that the species inhabits a great part of Mesoamerica, from Costa Rica to the Mexican state of Durango.

    Taxonomic Discussion

    Principal Components Analysis. PCA summarizes multivariate data in a reduced number of dimensions which are linear combinations of the original variables.

    The first 2 axes of the PCA represent 42.6% of the total variance (Fig. 3). Individuals from different Costa Rican and Mexican localities and caught on diverse host plants (belonging to genera Bidens, Schkuhria, Senecio and Stevia) are shown intermixed with each other. This suggests that all individuals belong to a single species no matter their procendence or host plant. Remarkably, some individuals from Costa Rica, which were bigger than the others, scored high on the first axis, which was dominated by antennae, leg, siphunculus and cauda variables.

    Fig. 3.

    Plot of Principal Components Analysis (PCA) of apterous viviparous females of Ucrymyzus villalobosi sp. n. from Costa Rica (fi01_323.gif) and Mexico (fi02_323.gif) recorded on different host-plant species.


    Morphological Discussion

    Ucrimyzus gen. n., Hyperomyzus Börner, 1933, Neoamphorophora Mason, 1924 and Utamphorophora Knowlton, 1946 are the only American genera that belong to Macrosiphini (Aphididae, Aphidinae) with the following features: (i) asymmetrically swollen siphunculi without a reticulated apical section; (ii) smooth head; (iii) frons with divergent lateral tubercles and shallow sinus; (iv) ventral margin of the antennal socket with a protuberance and (v) pointed or rounded dorsal setae, never clavate like those of Cryptomyzus Oestlund, 1923; and (vi) short setae on appendages, never long and erected like those in Decorosiphon Börner, 1939.

    Neoamphorophora and Utamphorophora differ conspicuously from Ucrimyzus gen. n. The Neoamphorophora apterous viviparous females have protruding frontomedial tubercle and a dorsoabdominal patch, and the alatae have dorsoabdominal cross bands. In Utamphorophora the ultimate rostral segment is short-triangular (characteristic shape of grass-inhabiting aphids) with only 2 (infrequently 3 or 4) accessory setae.

    Only Hyperomyzus, including subgenus Neonasonovia, presents features resembling those of the new genus: appearance and color of living apterae, smooth swollen siphunculi, cephalic cuticular ornamentation, frontal profile, secondary sensoria on several antennal segments of apterae. However, the prothoracic spiracular apertures are typically bigger than the abdominal ones in the subgenera of Hyperomyzus.

    Many species of Macrosiphini live on plant species belonging to Asteraceae, including species of Bidens, Schkuhria, Senecio and Stevia. They are included in the keys (one per host plant genus) by Blackman & Eastop (2006). Since the characteristics exhibited by U. villalobosi sp. n. differ from those of the other Macrosiphini species, the identification keys were modified to include the new species (see annex 1).


    A 710 bp DNA fragment containing a portion of the mitochondrial COI gene was amplified through PCR from the 3 individual aphids analyzed. After removing primer sequences, useful sequences consisted of 658 nucleotides. Sequences for the 3 sampled aphids were identical so a single sequence was finally deposited in Genbank (accession number KC110893). The online identification engine available at the Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD) (Ratnasingham & Hebert 2007) using the COI species database, failed to find any record corresponding to any identified species that matched our sequence. After a BLASTN search against the non-redundant nucleotide database at the NCBI, sequences from different aphid genera of the tribe Macrosiphini, such as Aulacorthum, Acyrthosiphon, Hyperomyzus, Macrosiphum, Nasonovia and Uroleucon were most similar to our sequence (94–96% identical). Since the COI sequence from U. villalobosi sp. n. did not match any sequence available at the DNA barcode reference library, we must conclude that it corresponds to a species not represented in the database, which currently hosts sequences from near 300 species from 70 genera within the subfamily Aphidinae. Moreover, we were also unable to assign the new species to any previously described genus based on the COI sequence as both strict tree-based and best close match assignment criteria (Wilson et al. 2011) were not fulfilled. Phylogenetic reconstructions using a set of available sequences from different Macrosiphini representatives were not informative about the phylogenetic affiliation of U. villalobosi sp. n., which grouped with Delphiniobium hanla, although with very low support, since they differed at 3.8% of the aligned positions (results not shown). This lack of resolution of COI for phylogeny inference is not surprising and it may be a weak phylogenetic signal compared with other markers as previously reported (Wilson 2010).

    For the elongation factor-1 alpha gene fragment (EF1α) we obtained an identical sequence of 910 bp from the 3 analyzed individuals that was deposited in Genbank with accession number KC110894. Using sequences available for EF1α at NCBI for different Macrosiphini species, a Maximum Likelihood tree, which included the sequence obtained for our species, was built (Fig. 4). Contrary to COI, phylogenetic analysis using EF1α did not support the grouping of U. villalobosi sp. n. with the only Delphiniobium sequence available in GenBank (excluded from the final analysis because of its shorter length), but rather it grouped within a highly supported clade formed by 3 groups of sequences. One group contained sequences from species of genera such as Acyrthosiphon, Aulacorthum, Macrosiphum, Metopolophium and Sitobion. A second group included sequences from Nasonovia, Hyperomyzus and Obtusicauda. A third group contained sequences from Uroleucon and Macrosiphoniella (see Fig. 4). U. villalobosi sp. n. occupied a somewhat intermediate position between the first 2 groups of this clade, grouping, albeit with low support, with either of them depending on the precise parameters or the algorithm used in phylogenetic inference. Interestingly, another new species sampled from the same region (Nieto Nafría et al. in press), also grouped within this clade but closer to the third group described above.

    Fig. 4.

    Maximum Likelihood tree obtained for EF1α sequences from different Macrosophini species including Ucrimyzus villalobosi sp. n. (highlighted). Sequences from aphid species other than U. villalobosi were obtained from the NCBI database and their accession numbers are indicated. A discrete Gamma distribution was used to model evolutionary rate differences among sites (5 categories (+G, parameter = 0.4096)). The rate variation model allowed for some sites to be evolutionarily invariable ([+I], 47.0010% sites). The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated leaving a total of 816 positions in the final dataset. Percentage bootstrap support values obtained after 200 replicates are indicated above branches when higher than 50%.



    This research was supported in Costa Rica by the Spanish Agency for International Development Cooperation (AECID) (ref. D/010523/07). Partial support was also obtained from the project CGL2010-22043 from the Spanish Government to D. Martínez-Torres. J. M. Nieto Nafría wishes to thank the Muséum national d'Historie naturelle of Paris for the grant he received in February 2011. The authors express their gratitude to Prof. Georges Remaudière for his support during the study and for the critical reading of the manuscript, and also to Dr. Susan Halbert and other three anonymous reviewers for their constructive criticisms and suggestions.



    R. L. Blackman 2010. Aphids - Aphidinae (Macrosiphini) In M. Wilson [ed.], Handbooks for Identification of British Insects, vol. 2, part 7. R. Entomol. Soc. by the Field Studies Council, London, UK 414 pp. Google Scholar


    R. L. Blackman , and V. F. Eastop 2006. Aphids on the World's Herbaceous Plants and Shrubs; Volume 1, Host Lists and Keys; Volume 2, The aphids. J. Wiley and Sons, Chichester, United Kingdom. 8 + 1439 pp. Google Scholar


    J. K. Bonfield , K. F. Smith , and R. Staden 1995. A new DNA sequence assembly program. Nucleic Acids Res. 23: 4992–4999. Google Scholar


    O. Folmer , M. Black , W. Hoeh , R. Lutz , and R. Vrijenhoek 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol. Marine Biol. Biotechnol. 3: 294–299. Google Scholar


    R. G. Foottit , and W. R. Richards 1993. The genera of the aphids of Canada; Homoptera: Aphidoidea and Phylloxeroidea In The Insects and Arachnids of Canada, part 22. Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Canada. 766 pp. Google Scholar


    O. E. Heie 1992. The Aphidoidea (Hemiptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. IV. Family Aphididae: Part 1 of the tribe Macrosiphini of subfamily Aphidinae. Fauna Entomol. Scandinavica 25: 1–190. Google Scholar


    O. E. Heie 1994. The Aphidoidea (Hemiptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. V. Family Aphididae: Part 2 of the tribe Macrosiphini. Fauna Entomol. Scandinavica 28: 1–241. Google Scholar


    O. E. Heie 1995. The Aphidoidea (Hemiptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. VI. Family Aphididae: Part 3 of the tribe Macrosiphini of subfamily Aphidinae, and family Lachnidae. Fauna Entomol. Scandinavica 31: 1–217. Google Scholar


    INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON ZOOLOGICAL NOMENCLATURE. 1999. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. 4th edition. - Spanish version: Código Internacional de Nomenclatura Zoológica, cuarta edición; 2000. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas and Sociedad de Amigos del Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid, Spain. 156 pp. Google Scholar


    M. A. Larkin , G. Blackshields , N. P. Brown , R. Chenna , P. A. McGettigan , H. McWilliam , F. Valentin , I. M. Wallace , A. Wilm , R. Lopez , J. D. Thompson , T. J. Gibson , and D. G. Higgins 2007. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23: 2947–2948. Google Scholar


    M. Miyazaki 1971. A revision of the tribe Macrosiphini of Japan (Homoptera: Aphididae, Aphidinae). Insecta Matsumurana (N.S.) 34(1): 1–247. Google Scholar


    N. A. Moran , M. E. Kaplan , M. J. Gelsey , T. G. Murphy , and E. A. Scholes 1999. Phylogenetics and evolution of the aphid genus Uroleucon based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. Syst. Entomol. 24: 85–93. Google Scholar


    J. M. Nieto Nafría , and M. P. Mier Durante 1998. Hemiptera Aphididae I In M. A. Ramos et al. [ed.], Fauna Ibérica, vol. 11. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC). Madrid, Spain. 424 pp. Google Scholar


    J. M. Nieto NafrÍA , N. PÉRez Hidalgo , D. MartÍNez-Torres , and W. Villalobos Muller (in press). A new aphid genus and species (Hemiptera, Aphididae, Macrosiphini) living on ferns in Costa Rica and Mexico. Canadian Entomol. Google Scholar


    S. Ratnasingham , and P. D. N. Hebert 2007. BOLD: the barcode of life data system ( ). Mol. Ecol. Notes 7: 355–364. Google Scholar


    K. Tamura , D. Peterson , N. Peterson , G. Stecher , M. Nei , and S. Kumar 2011. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28: 2731–2739. Google Scholar


    A. A. Truett , J. A. Walker , M. L. Warman , G. E. Truett , P. Heeger , and R. L. Mynatt 2000. Preparation of PCR-quality mouse genomic DNA with hot sodium hydroxide and tris (HotSHOT). BioTechniques 29(1): 52–53. Google Scholar


    W. Villalobos Muller , N. Pérez Hidalgo , M. P. Mier Durante , and J. M. Nieto Nafría 2010. Aphididae (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha) from Costa Rica, with new records for Central America. Bol. Asoc. Española Entomol. 34(1–2): 145–182. Google Scholar


    J. J. Wilson 2010. Assessing the value of DNA barcodes and other priority gene regions for molecular phylogenetics of Lepidoptera. PLoS ONE, 5(5): e10525. Google Scholar


    J. J. Wilson , R. Rougerie , J. Shonfeld , D. Janzen , W. Hallwachs , I. Kitching , J. Haxaire , M. Hajibabaei , and P. D. N. Hebert 2011. When species matches are unavailable are DNA barcodes correctly assigned to higher taxa? An assessment using sphingid moths. BMC Ecology 11: 18. Google Scholar



    M. Pilar Mier Durante, Nicolás Pérez Hidalgo, David Martínez-Torres, Sergio García-Tejero, Rebeca Peña Martínez, and Juan M. Nieto Nafría "A New Genus and Species of Asteraceae-Inhabiting Aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) from Costa Rica and Mexico," Florida Entomologist 96(2), 323-331, (1 June 2013).
    Published: 1 June 2013
    9 PAGES

    análisis de componentes principales
    citocromo oxidasa I
    cytochrome oxidase 1
    elongation factor 1α
    factor de elongación 1α
    Get copyright permission
    Back to Top