Translator Disclaimer
1 September 2013 Abundance of Adventive Thrips palmi (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) Populations in Florida During the First Sixteen Years
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Thrips palmi Karny (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), invaded Miami Dade-county in 1990 and caused significant economic damage by defoliating various vegetable crops. It commonly occurs on the abaxial surface of host leaves where eggs are deposited individually inside the leaf tissues. Highest abundance of T. palmi was recorded on bean and eggplant in 1991–1994 in Tropical Research and Education Center research plots and commercial fields in MiamiDade County. Density of T. palmi decreased significantly in subsequent years after the use of spinosad and other effective chemical insecticides. Thrips palmi populations increased in 2008 in spite of use of spinosad and showed increasing pattern causing crops loss at economic level. Orius insidiosus Say population was low in both TREC research fields and commercial fields due to harsh chemical management program, where insecticides belonging to various chemical classes were used alone (TREC fields) or in combination (commercial fields) to control T. palmi and other insect pests. None of the commonly used available insecticides alone or in combination provided satisfactory control of T. palmi in the early stage of invasion. Amongst various insecticides tested spinosad provided significant control of T. palmi on the crops until 2008 after which there was reduced effect of the chemical due to frequent use for managing multiple pests.

Thrips palmi Karny (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) is a polyphagous pest of much economic importance (Kirk 1997). It has a wide host range that includes at least 50 different plant species (Wang & Chu 1986). Damage caused by T. palmi is primarily due to feeding by adults and immatures on leaves and fruits of its host crop. Feeding may result in damaged terminals of the host, bronzing of leaves, which at the time of severe infestation may completely dry and die off, as well as production of scarred and deformed fruits. T. palmi may also cause host damage by transmitting at least 6 of the known tospoviruses (Nagata et al. 2002). Worldwide serious infestation of T. palmi has been detected on plants from family Solanaceae (eggplants, pepper, and potato), Cucurbitaceae (cucumber, watermelon, cantaloupe, and squash), and Leguminosae (kidney bean, snap bean, broad bean, cowpea, soybean, and whiteclover) (Nakahara 1984; Talekar 1991). In family Solanaceae, tomato is reported as a host of T. palmi only in the Caribbean (Capinera 2000) as the breeding population of T. palmi on tomato has not been reported elsewhere. Additional hosts include onion, cotton, avocado, citrus, peach, plum, muskmelon, hairy gourd, carnation and chrysanthemum (Gutierrez 1981: Riddle-Swan 1988; Ruhendi & Listinger 1979; Wangboonkong 1981; Yoshihara 1982). In south Florida, T. palmi has been reported as an devastating pest of bean, squash, cucumber, eggplant, pepper, potato and okra (Seal & Baranowski 1992).

Thrips palmi is native to Southeast Asia, specifically Sumatra and Java (Indonesia) where it was reported by Karny (1925) as a pest of tobacco (Fig. 1). Its distribution was limited to Southeast Asia until the mid 1970s (Capinera 2008) when a serious outbreak occurred in southern Japan (Sakimura et al. 1986). Subsequently, it became established in most of the Asian countries; Bangladesh, Brunei Darussalam, China, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Malaysia, Myanmar, Pakistan, Philippines, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Taiwan and Thailand. Currently, T. palmi has a wide distribution around the globe and it occurs in almost all the habitable landmarks of the world: Australia, Guam, New Caledonia, Samoa, Wallis and Futuna (Oceania); Netherland (Europe); Mauritius, Nigeria, Reunion, and Sudan (Africa); Brazil, Guyana, and Venezuela (South America); Antigua and Barbuda, Barbados, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Grenada, Guadeloupe, Haiti, Martinique, Puerto Rico, St. Lucia, St. Kits and Nevis, Trinidad and Tobago (Central America and Caribbean); Hawaii and Florida (North America) (CABI 1998). Within the continental United States, the field population of T. palmi is limited to the south of Orlando (Capinera 2000).

Fig. 1.

Global distribution of melon thrips, Thrips palmi Karny. ▪ = Present, no further details; fi01_789.gif =Widespread; ▴ = Localized; fi02_789.gif = Occasional or few reports.

f01_789.jpg

The wide host range of T. palmi provides abundant resources for it to dwell and survive throughout the year. Thrips palmi generally appears with the onset of cropping season on the newly emerged leaves of its host plant and inhabits the field until the maturation of the host crop (Capinera 2000). In South Florida irrespective of the host, populations of T. palmi are reported to be abundant from Jan to Mar and decrease after the month of May which could be because of the rainy season in this region that extends from midMay to mid-Sep. Information on temporal variability in the T. palmi population is imperative for early planning and time management in order to avoid substantial monetary loss due to the pest damage.

Use of chemical insecticides is considered as a primary mode of management for this pest, however, frequent application of the foliar insecticides have resulted in reduced susceptibility of T. palmi to a broad spectrum of insecticides over time. Pyrethroids, inorganic and chlorinated hydrocarbons are ineffective in managing T. palmi, and chemical groups such as organophosphates and carbamates have only limited effect on this pest (Seal & Baranowski 1992). Widely used insecticides such as Azinphos-methyl, Methomyl and Oxamyl also do not provide control of T. palmi and are known to achieve only 45–60% reduction of this pest. However, fermentation products such as abamectin (Seal & Baranowski 1992; Seal 1997) and spinosyn (Seal & Sabines 2012) have been quite effective in managing T. palmi in comparison to other classes of insecticides. Although T. palmi is not a recent invasive pest in south Florida, there is not much information on effective control strategies for this pest. In the present study we have summarized the population trend of T. palmi on beans and eggplants in Homestead, Florida during the first 16 years of its introduction. In addition, the abundance of minute pirate bug Orius insidious Say (Anthocoridae) - a naturally occurring predator of T. palmi - was also monitored in the agro-ecosystem and its compatibility with various insecticides used in managing T. palmi is presented.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Population Abundance of T. palmi

Studies on population abundance of T. palmi on 2 major host crops-snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.; Fabaceae) and eggplant (Solanum melongena L.; Solanaceae) were conducted beginning 1994 to 2010. ‘Pod Squad’ snap beans were planted in field plots at the University of Florida, Tropical Research and Education Center (TREC), Homestead, Florida. The planting was done in the first wk of Jan each year, where each planting lasted for 2 months. Field plots consisted of twelve 48 mlong rows where seeds were sown 15.2 cm apart within the row and 91.4 cm between rows. Plants were irrigated once daily using a drip system. Fertilizer (N-P-K mix) was applied at 224-56-269 kg per ha.

‘Black Beauty’ eggplant seedlings were transplanted 45 cm apart within row on raised beds 91 cm wide, 15 cm high, and 182 cm between centers. All other cultural practices were as described for the propagation of snap beans. Both crops were treated with azadirachtin, in rotation with abamectin, methomyl and spinosad. Data were also collected from commercial fields at the same time as our experimental data, from farms located in the Homestead area (within 2 miles [3.2 km] diam of TREC). Commercial fields were managed by growers using standard cultural practices. Insecticide programs for managing T. palmi were variable using 2 to 3 insecticides in a tank mix which consisted inter alia of methomyl, azinphosmethyl, oxamyl, endosulfan and pyrethroids. Spinosad was added to the management program after 1996.

The experimental fields for both the crops in TREC and growers fields were divided into 4 equal blocks for the ease of sampling. Sampling was initiated 3 wk post planting and 4 samples of 10 full grown young bean leaves or 5 eggplant leaves (one leaf/plant) were collected from each block. All leaf samples belonging to each plot were placed in a separate ziplock® bag marked with the date of collection and plot. Samples were transported to the laboratory and processed as described by Kakkar et al. (2012). The total number of T. palmi adults and larvae in each sample were recorded using a binocular microscope (10X). The mean number of thrips from the samples collected in a season are presented in the figures.

Population Abundance of O. insidiosus

This study was conducted in same fields used to determine population abundance of T. palmi. A count of nymphs and adults of O. insidiosus was recorded by visually observing 20 randomly selected plants from each plot in a field.

Effectiveness of Insecticides against T. palmi

Insecticides of various chemical classes were evaluated for their efficacy in controlling T. palmi on snap beans and eggplants planted in TREC experimental field during a period extending from 1994–2006 (Table 1). Various chemical classes included in this study were: 1) neonicotinoid, 2) glycoside and fermentation products, 3) carbamates, 4) organophosphates, 5) benzoylphenyl urea, 6) pyrethroids, and 7) others.

The experimental plots consisted of two 9 mlong and 91 cm-wide rows. Snap beans and eggplants were planted at 15 cm and 45 cm within row spacing (respectively), and 91 cm between centers. Bean was planted on the flat ground and eggplant was planted on raised beds. All treatments were applied 4 times at weekly intervals using a backpack sprayer with 2 nozzles delivering 70 gpa (786 L/ha). Treatments were evaluated 48 h post application by randomly collecting 10 leaves (one leaf/plant) in each treatment plot. All leaf samples belonging to each plot were placed in a separate ziplock® bags marked with date of collection and treatment plot. Samples were transported to the laboratory and processed as described above. Effectiveness of each insecticide was presented as a range of percent control = ([numbers in treatments/numbers in control]*100).

TABLE 1.

VARIOUS INSECTICIDES USED DURING THE EARLY STAGE OF INVASION OF SOUTH FLORIDA BY THRIPS PALMI, AND THEIR EFFICACY LEVELS ON THE THRIPS AND ORIUS POPULATIONS.

t01_789.gif

Effect of Insecticides on O. insidiosus

Laboratory bioassays were conducted to determine effect of insecticides on O. insidiosus. A solution of each insecticide (500 mL) from field spray was set aside before the initial spray in our insecticide evaluation study. Host leaves were dipped in the solutions and air dried to remove excess water. Four 1 cm-diam treated host leaf discs were then placed in a Petri dish. Four O. insidiosus nymphs (second instars) were then placed in a Petri dish with treated leaves and replicated 4 times. Nymphs were checked every day at 24 h intervals to record mortality. Effect of each insecticide was expressed as low, medium and high for 5–20%, 21–50%, 51–100% mortality of O. insidiosus, respectively. For the present study O. insidiosus nymphs were collected from a laboratory colony maintained on eggplant infested with silverleaf whitefly, Bemisia argentifolii Bellows and Perring (Aleyrodidae).

Statistical Analysis

Data from field studies on each crop are presented and analyzed for the years 1994, 1996, 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006, 2008 and 2010. Data on the abundance of T. palmi and O. insidiosus were averaged for all samplings. The mean numbers of immatures and adults on each crop were compared separately using one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (PROC GLM, SAS Institute Inc. 2003). Data were analyzed independently for larvae and adults. Data were transformed by square root (x + 0.25) before analysis. Untransformed means are reported in the figures. The Duncan Muliple K ratio t test was used to separate treatment means where significant (P < 0.05) differences occurred (Waller & Duncan 1969).

RESULTS

Population Abundance of T. palmi

On beans, the T. palmi population (ca. 500 larvae/10 leaves; 100 adults/10 leaves) was observed to be the highest in 1994 (Fig. 2). Thereafter, decreases in thrips density were observed until 2006 and the population started to build up and higher number of thrips was sampled in 2008 and 2010. Both immature and adult thrips followed the same pattern of population abundance over the yr. Similar to thrips densities in the fields at TREC, the highest abundances of T. palmi (ca. 900 larvae/10 leaves) were observed in 1994 in commercial bean samples (Fig. 3).

Population abundance of T. palmi on eggplants corresponded to the thrips density on beans. In the TREC fields, the highest population abundance (ca. 1,000 larvae/10 leaves) was observed in 1994 (Fig. 4), which declined thereafter, and populations remained at low levels between 2000 (ca. 100 larvae/10-leaf sample) to 2008 (ca. 112 larvae/10-leaf sample). Similar to the TREC eggplant field results, the highest number of T. palmi larvae and adults were recorded in commercial fields in 1994 (Fig. 5). Mean numbers of T. palmi larvae fluctuated between 70–100/10-leaf samples during 2000 to 2006, which increased in 2008 and 2010.

Population Abundance of O. insidiosus

Low population abundance of O. insidiosus was observed on bean and eggplant crops at TREC and in commercial fields (Figs. 6, 7, 8, and 9). In all the plantings, mean number of adults was higher than the mean number of nymphs. In the TREC bean field, O. insidiosus nymphs and adults were observed in all the sampling yr (Fig. 6), however in commercial bean fields, nymphs of O. insidiosus were always absent, while adults showed irregular population densities over the yr (Fig. 7). In TREC eggplant fields, O. insidiosus adults and nymphs were observed in all plantings, although the numbers were low (Fig. 8). In commercial eggplant fields, abundance distribution of adults and nymphs of O. insidiosus were irregular during the study period. Large numbers of O. insidiosus were collected from 2002 to 2008 (Fig. 9).

Fig. 2.

Mean numbers of Thrips palmi adults and larvae in bean fields at TREC (Larvae: F = 22.23; df = 8, 27; P < 0.0001; Adults: F = 45.69; df = 8, 27; P = 0.001).

f02_789.jpg

Fig. 3.

Mean numbers of Thrips palmi adults and larvae in commercial bean fields (Larvae: F = 52.97; df = 8, 27; P < 0.0001; Adults: F = 71.87; df = 8, 27; P < 0.0001).

f03_789.jpg

Fig. 4.

Mean numbers of Thrips palmi adults and larvae in eggplant fields at TREC (Larvae: F = 65.52; df = 8, 27; P < 0.0001; Adults: F = 78.24; df = 8, 27; P < 0.0001).

f04_789.jpg

Fig. 5.

Mean numbers of Thrips palmi adults and larvae in commercial eggplant fields TREC (Larvae: F = 70.24; df = 8, 27; P < 0.0001; Adults: F = 56.25; df = 8, 27; P < 0.0001).

f05_789.jpg

Fig. 6.

Mean numbers of Orius insidosus adults and nymphs in bean fields at TREC (Larvae: F = 0.34; df = 8, 27; P > 0.05; Adults: F = 0.60; df = 8, 27; P > 0.05).

f06_789.jpg

Effectiveness of Insecticides against T. palmi

Insecticides of various chemical groups caused mortality of T. palmi adults and larvae in various studies (Table 1). Imidacloprid (neonicotinoid) and organophosphates provided moderate levels (30–55% and 35–52%, respectively) of T. palmi control, while pyrethroids could only suppress 20–45% of the population. Abamectin (glycoside) was a commonly used insecticide for managing vegetable leafminers, and when tested against T. palmi it provided a 55–65% reduction of the thrips population. Spinosad provided high levels of control (80–95%) and was commonly used by the vegetable growers for the management of T. palmi in vegetable crops. Among the carbamates, formetanate hydrochloride was the most effective in providing highest level (85–98%) of T. palmi mortality, followed by methomyl and oxamyl. Other groups of insecticides, shown in Table 1, did not provide satisfactory levels of control of T. palmi.

Fig. 7.

Mean numbers of Orius insidosus adults and nymphs in commercial bean fields (Larvae: F = 0.99; df = 8, 27; P > 0.05; Adults: F = 0.84; df = 8, 27; P > 0.05).

f07_789.jpg

Fig. 8.

Mean numbers of Orius insidosus adults and nymphs in eggplant fields at TREC (Larvae: F = 0.56; df = 8, 27; P > 0.05; Adults: F = 0.62; df = 8, 27; P > 0.05).

f08_789.jpg

Effect of Insecticides on O. insidiosus

At the beginning of the invasion, organophosphates and carbamates were the commonly used insecticides to combat T. palmi in vegetable crops. Most of these products caused medium to high levels of mortality in O. insidiosus (Table 1). Neonicotinoids applied as a soil drench and on foliage were comparatively benign on O. insidiosus. Benzoylphenyl urea insecticides were used on foliage and were low to medium in toxicity to O. insidiosus. The botanical insecticide, azadirachtin, used on foliage was highly benign to O. insidiosus. Spinosad, one of the most effective labeled insecticide for managing T. palmi, provided low to medium levels of O. insidiosus mortality.

Fig. 9.

Mean numbers of Orius insidosus adults and nymphs in commercial eggplant fields (Larvae: F = 1.02; df = 8, 27; P > 0.05; Adults: F = 0.89; df = 8, 27; P > 0.05).

f09_789.jpg

DISCUSSION

At the beginning of the T. palmi invasion in 1990, almost no information was available about the management of this pest (Seal & Baranowski 1992; Seal 1993). To cope with the rapid population increase, insecticides from all available classes were used to control T. palmi in commercial vegetable fields. As none of the insecticides were effective enough to suppress this pest below economic injury levels, multiple insecticides were mixed together into individual spray tanks to achieve the highest level of control (D. R. S. personal observation). Nonetheless, use of multiple insecticides in a tank mix could not improve the management of T. palmi. For example, the combination of flucycloxuron and malathion did not differ from non-treated controls in regulating T. palmi on ‘Pod Squad’ beans in South Florida (Seal & Baranowski 1992). Because of the lack of desired efficacy of available insecticides, the T. palmi population remained dense during 1994 on beans and eggplants in the TREC research fields as well as commercial fields. The T. palmi population density was dramatically reduced in all plantings of vegetables in south Florida in 1996 and onwards due to the addition of spinosad in the T. palmi management program.

Population levels of T. palmi were higher in commercial bean fields (ca. 920/10 leaf samples) than in TREC research fields (ca. 500 larvae/10leaf samples) in 1994. Similarly, the thrips populations in commercial eggplant fields were greater than those in the TREC eggplant field. The comparatively higher level of T. palmi population in commercial fields was caused by the frequent use of multiple ineffective insecticides in tank mixes, which exerted negative effects on the naturally occurring native biocontrol agents. Thus, during this study period we observed very sparse populations of naturally occurring O. insidiosus at all the study areas. Once growers started a spinosad program, T. palmi populations were consistently suppressed in all commercial fields until 2008. During the period of 1996 to 2006, T. palmi populations in commercial fields were consistently less than in the experimental fields. Commercial fields were sprayed weekly with spinosad, whereas, experimental fields were sprayed only as needed. Orius insidiosus populations were comparatively higher in experimental fields than in the commercial fields irrespective of crop types. The low level of O. insidiosus in commercial bean and eggplant fields reflected the use of harsh insecticides not applied in the experimental fields. In the commercial bean and eggplant fields, O. insidiosus nymphs were almost absent. A few O. insidiosus adults were observed which might have moved in temporarily from the neighboring fields.

This report summarizes the population trend of T. palmi in first 4 quadrennia of its invasion of south Florida, and provides information on the management of this pest by using effective insecticides in a timely manner. Depending solely on a specific insecticide to manage insect pests may cause failure in management programs. In the T. palmi management program, spinosad was the most effective tool until 2008. The effectiveness of spinosad has been debilitated by its frequent use during the last 14 years. In light of this study, management programs against a pest insect should be developed by applying multiple effective insecticides in rotation. The use of harsh chemicals should be avoided to preserve the natural biocontrol agents which play a significant role in insect pest management.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We would like to thank John Zukowski and Jennifer Wildonger (University of Florida) for reviewing the initial draft of this article.

REFERENCES CITED

1.

Cabi. 1998. Thrips palmi Karny. Distribution Maps of Plant pests.  http://www.cabi.org/dmpp/FullTextPDF/2006/20066600480.pdf (Accessed: May 25 2013). Google Scholar

2.

J. L. Capinera 2000. Melon thrips. Featured Creatures. EDIS. Entomology and Neonatology Department, IFAS, University of Florida,  http://entnemdept.ufl.edu/creatures/veg/melon_thrips.htm (Accessed: May 12 2013). Google Scholar

3.

J. L. Capinera 2008. Encyclopedia of Entomology, 2nd Edition, pp. 2335–2337. Vols. 1–4. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Google Scholar

4.

J. Gutierrez 1981. Updating of data on economic entomology on Wallis and Futuna. Obstrom, Noumea, New Caledonia. 24 pp. Google Scholar

5.

G. Kakkar , D. R. Seal , and V. Kumar 2012. Assessing abundance and distribution of an invasive thrips Frankliniella schultzei (Trybom) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in south Florida. Bull. Entomol. Res. 102: 249–259. Google Scholar

6.

H. H. Karny 1925. Die an Tabak auf Java und Sumatra angetroffenen Blasenfusser (Thysanoptera). Bull. Deli Proefstation. 23: 3–55. Google Scholar

7.

W. D. J. Kirk 1997. Feeding, pp. 119–174 In T. Lewis [ed.], Thrips As Crop Pests. CAB International, Wallingford. Google Scholar

8.

T. Nagata , A. C. L. Almeida , R. De O. Resende , and Avila A. C. De . 2002. The transmission specificity and efficiency of tospoviruses, pp. 45–52 In R. Marullo and L. Mound [eds.], Thrips and Tospoviruses: Proc. 7th Intl. Symp. Thysanoptera. Australian Nat. Insect Collection, Canberra, Australia. Google Scholar

9.

L. M. Nakahara 1984. New State record: Thrips palmi Karny. Hawaii pest report. Hawaii Dept. Agric. 4(1): 15 pp. Google Scholar

10.

A. Riddle-Swan Kawai 1988. Studies on population ecology, 1983. Annu Rep. 1981–1982. Hong Kong Dept. Agric. and Fisheries 69. (Abs.: Rev. Appl. Entomol. A71:848). Google Scholar

11.

Ruhendi , and J. A. Listinger . 1979. Insect-suppressing effect of rice stubble height, tillage practices, and straw mulch in a wetland rice-cowpea cropping pattern. Intern. Rice Res. Newsletter 4(3): 26–27. Google Scholar

12.

K. Sakimura , L. M. Nakahara , and H. A. Denmark 1986. A thrips, Thrips palmi Karny (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Entomological Circular, Florida Dept. Agric. and Consumer Serv., Div. Plant Indus. No. 280. Google Scholar

13.

D. R. Seal , and R. M. Baranowski 1992. Effectiveness of different insecticides for the control of Thrips palmi Karny (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) affecting vegetables in south Florida. Proc. Florida State Hort. Soc. 105: 315–319. Google Scholar

14.

D. R. Seal , R. M. Baranowski , and Bishop J. D . 1993. Effectiveness of insecticides in controlling Thrips palmi Karny (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on different vegetable crops in South Florida. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 106: 228–233. Google Scholar

15.

D. R. Seal 1997. Management and biology of Thrips palmi Karny (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), pp. 161–181 In K. Bondari [ed.], New Developments in Entomology. Research Signpost, T. C. 36/248 (1), Trivandrum-695 008, India. Google Scholar

16.

D. R. Seal , and C. M. Sabines . 2012. Combating melon thrips, Thrips palmi Karny (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in South Florida. Proc. Florida State Hort. Soc. 125: 196–200. Google Scholar

17.

N. S. TALEKAR 1991. Thrips in Southeast Asia: Proc. Regional Consultation Workshop, Bangkok, Thailand, 13 March 1991. Tainan, Taiwan; Asia Vegetable Res.Dev. Center. 74 pp. Google Scholar

18.

S. Wangboonkong 1981. Chemical control of cotton insect pests in Thailand. Trop. Pest Mgt. 27: 495–500. Google Scholar

19.

C. L. Wang , and Y. I. Chu 1986. Rearing method of southern yellow thrips, Thrips palmi Karny, in the laboratory. Plant Prot. Bull. (Taiwan, R.O.C) 28: 411. Google Scholar

20.

R. A. Waller , and D. B. Duncan 1969. A Bayes rule for the symmetric multiple comparison problem. J. American. Stat. Assoc. 64: 1484–1503. Google Scholar

21.

T. Yoshihara 1982. An overview of research on Thrips palmi Karny in Japan. Entomol. Lab., Krume Veg. Esp. Substa., Krume, Japan. 22 pp. Google Scholar

Notes

[1] §Summarized from a presentation and discussions at the “Native or Invasive - Florida Harbors Everyone” Symposium at the Annual Meeting of the Florida Entomological Society, 24 July 2012, Jupiter, Florida.

Dakshina R. Seal, Vivek Kumar, Garima Kakkar, and Simone Costa Mello "Abundance of Adventive Thrips palmi (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) Populations in Florida During the First Sixteen Years," Florida Entomologist 96(3), 789-796, (1 September 2013). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.096.0312
Published: 1 September 2013
JOURNAL ARTICLE
8 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top