Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
1 September 2013 The Midgut of the Parasitoid Campoletis flavicincta (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae)
Wagner G. Gonçalves, Kenner M. Fernandes, Max P. Gonçalves, Clóvis A. Neves, Gustavo F. Martins, José C. Zanuncio, José E. Serrão
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The midgut epithelium of insects is composed mainly of digestive cells, responsible for the digestion and absorption of food, and regenerative cells, which play a role in cell renewal. The morphological and histochemical analyses of the midgut of Campoletis flavicincta (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) showed that it is similar to those of other Hymenoptera. Morphometric analyses revealed differences in cell height, length of the striated border, and nuclear area of the digestive cells along the midgut. The nuclear area of regenerative cells was similar between the anterior and posterior midgut regions. These results demonstrate that the anterior and posterior midgut regions are morphologically distinct from each other.

Campoletis flavicincta is an important parasitoid of Lepidoptera larvae found in subtropical and temperate regions of North and South America. This insect is a potential biocontrol agent of the caterpillar Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith) because it parasitizes the first instar of this pest, before it can cause significant damage to corn plantations (Dequech et al. 2005). Larvae of C. flavicincta feed on the internal contents of the host, and exit the caterpillar body to build a cocoon in the external environment at the onset of the pupal stage (Cruz et al. 1995; Cruz 1995). The life cycle of the parasitoid is 19 days, including 12 days from egg to pupa and 7 days of the pupal period. Adults feed upon nectar and have longevities of 23 days for females and 29 days for males (Ashley 1979; Patel & Habib 1987; Cruz et al. 1995; Cruz et al. 1997).

Storage of nutritional resources is important for holometabolous species that have developmental stages during metamorphosis when insects do not feed. The midgut is the main organ responsible for receiving food and selectively provides nutritional resources for development (Klowden 2007; Hakim et al. 2010).

The midgut of hymenopterans is a relatively long tube, lined with a single layered epithelium, 2 layers of circular (inner) and longitudinal (outer) muscles, and a peritrophic membrane enclosing the food (Snodgrass 1935; Serrão & Cruz-Landim 1996b). The midgut epithelium consists of 3 cell types: digestive or principal cells, regenerative cells and endocrine cells (Cruz-Landim & Mello 1970; Cruz-Landim et al. 1996; Neves et al. 2003; Teixeira et al. in press). Digestive cells have microvilli on their apical surfaces and invaginations in the basolateral plasma membrane. Digestive cells are responsible for the synthesis of digestive enzymes and absorption of digested products (Terra 1990; Hakim et al. 2010; Fialho et al. in press). Regenerative cells differentiate into new digestive cells, constantly renewing the intestinal epithelium (Billingsley & Lehane 1996; Cruz et al. 2011). Endocrine cells are responsible for release of small peptides with hormonal characteristics. Although the biological role of these cells is not clearly established, they are involved in digestion, peristalsis, diuresis and development (Cruz-Landim 2009; Takashima et al. 2011).

Besides being the largest endocrine organ of insects, the midgut is responsible for digestion and absorption (Zitnan et al. 1993; Hakim et al. 2010). In order to contribute to a better understanding of digestive processes in parasitoids, this paper describes the morphology of different midgut regions of newly emerged C. flavicincta adults.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twelve males of C. flavicincta were obtained from the Entomology Laboratory, Embrapa Maize and Sorghum, Sete Lagoas, Minas Gerais state, Brazil. These parasitoids were reared on an artificially controlled environment (25 ± 2 °C, 70 ± 10% RH and 12:12 h L:D and fed a 10% honey solution. Twenty-four h old adults were anesthetized at 4 °C and their midguts dissected in saline solution (0.1 M NaCl, 20 mM KH2PO4 and 20 mM Na2HPO4). The midguts were transferred to Carson's formalin fixative solution (Carson et al. 1973) for 24 h at room temperature. After fixation, 6 midguts were washed in distilled water and stained with diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) for 30 min, mounted in 50% sucrose solution and observed under an epifluorescence microscope (Olympus BX-60) with a UV excitation filter. Images were obtained with a digital camera (Q-Color, 3 Olympus) coupled to the microscope. Six more midguts were dehydrated in a graded ethanol series, embedded in histoResin (HistoResin Leica), sectioned into 3-μm thick slices and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Some sections were subjected to Alcian Blue (AB) histochemical tests at pH 2.5 conjugated with the Periodic Acid Schiff (PAS) (Gajger et al. 2011) to determine the presence of glycogen, glycoproteins, glycolipids, acid mucins, acid glycoconjugates and neutral glycoconjugates. The images obtained from DAPI stained whole midguts were used to count the number of digestive and regenerative cells. Twenty digestive and 10 regenerative cell nuclei were used to measure nuclear area. The histological sections were used to measure the height of digestive cells, the length of the striated border, the nuclear area and the area of the regenerative cell nests. Morphometric data were obtained from the computer program ImagePro Plus 4.5 (Media Cybernetics) and analyzed through Student's t test or Mann-Whitney statistical tests for data with normal and non-normal distribution, respectively(5% significance level).

RESULTS

The midgut epithelium of C. flavicincta was formed by a single layer of columnar digestive cells with a well-developed striated border and oval nuclei possessing 1 or 2 evident nucleoli. Scattered regenerative cells nests were present at the base of the digestive cells, close to the basal membrane. External to the midgut epithelium of C. flavicincta, an inner circular and an outer longitudinal muscular layers were present (Figs. 1 and 2). The median-apical region of digestive cells was strongly basophilic while the basal portion was predominantly acidophilic (Fig. 2).

Alcian blue/PAS (AB/PAS) histochemical test showed a strong reaction to PAS in the striated border and cytoplasmic granules in the apical portion of digestive cells. The basal and peritrophic membranes exhibited a moderate reaction to PAS, allowing their identification; whereas the regenerative cell nests and muscle layers were negative for this histochemical test (Fig. 1). The negative reaction for AB indicated the absence of acid glycoconjugates such as gastrointestinal acid mucins. However, some regions had neutral glycoconjugates that showed PAS positive reactions.

Morphometric data of the histological sections showed significant differences among the anterior and posterior midgut regions of C. flavicincta. The anterior midgut region showed longer digestive cells (34 ± 4.6 μm) and a longer striated border (3.6 ± 0.6 μm) than the posterior midgut region [(P < 0.05) (Figs. 5 and 6)].

The morphometry of the entire midgut under DAPI staining showed that nuclei of digestive cells were larger in the anterior midgut region (45 ± 3.36 μm2) compared with the posterior midgut region (25 ± 2.04 μm2) [(P < 0.05) (Fig. 7)]. The number of digestive cells was greater in the posterior midgut region, with 107 ± 3.8 cells, whereas the anterior midgut region had 90 ± 5.3 cells [(P < 0.05) (Fig. 8)].

Images obtained from DAPI demonstrated that digestive cells are surrounded by regenerative cells or form nests with up to six cells (Figs. 3 and 4). The nucleus size of regenerative cells (4.13 ± 1.2 μm2) and the number of cells (250 ± 24 cells) were similar in the anterior and posterior midgut regions [(P = 0.879) (Figs. 9 and 10)]. No digestive or regenerative cells in the process of cell division were found.

DISCUSSION

The midgut of C. flavicincta showed morphological differences between the anterior and posterior regions. The midgut is constituted by a simple epithelium formed by columnar digestive cells with a well-developed striated border surrounded by 2 muscle layers similar to other Hymenoptera (Serrão & Cruz-Landim 1995; Bution et al. 2006; Moreira et al. 2008; Bution & Caetano 2008; Gajger et al. 2011).

Figs. 1–4.

Midgut of Campoletis flavicincta male. (1) Longitudinal section of the anterior region, Staining AB/ PAS showing the digestive cells (dc), regenerative cells (re), muscle (mu), striated border (sb), peritrophic membrane (pm) and lumen (L). (2) Longitudinal section of the posterior region, H.E. staining, showing the digestive cells (dc), regenerative cells (re), muscle (mu), striated border (sb) and lumen (L). (3) MT - Malpighian tubules and (4) Posterior region of Campoletis flavicincta in total assembly showing nuclei of regenerative cells (arrowheads) and nuclei of digestive cells (dc). Bars = 20 μm.

f01_1016.jpg

The midgut digestive cells showed polarity with the basophilic apex and PAS-positive granules protruding into the lumen, suggesting the secretion of neutral glycoconjugates along the entire midgut, similar to other hymenopterans (Neves et al. 2002; Bution et al. 2006; Bution & Caetano 2008). Insects release compounds to the midgut lumen such as digestive enzymes (Serrão & Cruz-Landim 2000; Fialho et al. 2013) and peritrophic membrane compounds (Marques-Silva et al. 2005) via apocrine secretion, which may be carbohydrates or glycoconjugates as shown by PAS-positive granules along the entire midgut of C. flavicincta.

No acidic glycoconjugates were detected by the Alcian blue test to acidic mucins; however, presence of neutral glycoconjugates was shown by the PAS test to the peritrophic membrane. The presence of abundant glycosylated molecules on the peritrophic membrane may be associated with lubrication and epithelial protection against proteolysis and microorganism invasion (Vuoculo et al. 2001). The origin of the peritrophic membrane is unclear. However, the PAS-positive reaction of the peritrophic membrane, and the cytoplasm granules in the apical portion of the digestive cells, corroborate the hypothesis that the peritrophic membrane is synthesized along the whole midgut surface, and not only in the anterior region, as previously reported (Bowen 1968; Serrão & Cruz-Landim 1996a; Marques-Silva et al. 2005).

Figs 5–6.

Morphometric analysis of midgut regions Campoletis flavicincta in histological section. (5) Epithelial height. (6) length of the striated border (microvilli). Vertical bars represent the standard deviation. * Indicates significant difference (t Student test at P < 0.05).

f05_1016.jpg

A variation in the number of digestive cells between the anterior and posterior midgut regions was also reported in the midgut of the stingless bee Melipona quadrifasciata anthidioides (Fernandes et al. 2010), which has fewer digestive cells in the anterior midgut region. In C. flavicincta the digestive cells were larger in the anterior region, resulting in a low number of digestive cells in this region. A difference in size of the digestive cells also occurs in Diatraea saccharalis (Lepidoptera), which exhibits larger cells in the posterior midgut region (Pinheiro et al. 2003; Pinheiro et al. 2006).

In C. flavicincta the striated border is longer in the anterior midgut region, similar to that found in the stingless bees Trigona hypogea and Trigona spinipes, which have longer microvilli in their midgut region (Serrão & Cruz-Landim 1996b). Longer microvilli result in increased surface area of the digestive cells, suggesting high nutrient absorption in the anterior midgut region as reported in some species of bees (Serrão & Cruz-Landim 2000), Brontocoris tabidus (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) (Fialho et al. 2009) and the mosquito Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) (Valotto et al. 2011).

The histological sections showed no significant differences in the nuclear area of digestive cells along the midgut; however, the DAPI stained digestive cells had larger nuclei in the midgut anterior region, suggesting a possible relationship with DNA amplification, necessary for increased cell activity (Billingsley 1989; Zudaire et al. 2004; Fernandes et al. 2010).

Our observations support the endo-ectoperitrophic digestion hypothesis proposed for bees, where the posterior midgut region is responsible for water release into the lumen, whereas the anterior midgut region plays a role in nutrient absorption. Nutrients are transported through water flux (Terra 1990; Shumaker et al. 1993). We suggest that the anterior midgut of C. flavicincta plays a role in absorption due to long striated border, whereas the posterior midgut may be responsible of water release to the midgut lumen.

Regenerative cells in the midgut of hymenopterans are located in the basal region of the epithelium, never reaching the lumen of the organ, and are found either isolated or forming nests (Raes et al. 1994; Martins et al. 2006; Fernandes et al. 2010). Cytoplasm projections form points of contact between the nests which could be responsible for cell differentiation synchronization of regenerative cells (Martins et al. 2006). However, the arrangement of regenerative cells is quite different in C. flavicincta, which are also found surrounding the digestive cells. Such organization suggests that digestive cells play a role in synchronization of cell differentiation of the regenerative cells.

The literature reports occurrence of mitosis in the midgut of M. quadrifasciata anthidioides pupae, but not in the adult stage (Cruz et al. 2013). Our study demonstrates that mitosis does not occur in digestive or regenerative cells of C. flavicincta adults, corroborating the hypothesis that no cell division occurs in the midgut cells of adult Hymenoptera (Cruz-Landim et al. 1996; Cruz-Landim & Moraes 2000). However, some adult Hymenoptera with long lifespan, such as bee queens, have replacement of digestive cells by mitosis (França et al. 2006).

Figs. 7–10.

Morphometric analysis of midgut regions of Campoletis flavicincta in total assembly (DAPI). (7) Area of nuclei of digestive cells. (8) Number of cells digestive. (9) Area of nuclei of regenerative cells. (10) Number of regenerative cells. Vertical bars are standard deviation. * Indicates significant difference (t Student test at P < 0.05).

f07_1016.jpg

This study showed functional and morphological differences between the anterior and posterior midgut regions of C. flavicincta. The high metabolic activity of the anterior midgut region did not result in differences in the number of regenerative cells between the regions.

The results of this study suggest the midgut of adult C. flavicincta, despite having carnivorous larval habits, is similar to necrophage and pollen feeding bees (Serrâo & Cruz-Landim 1995). Although the gut of C. flavicincta does not have not specialized structures, it seems adapted to food digestion and absorption for insect development.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported by the Brazilian research agencies, CNPq, FAPEMIG, CAPES. Authors are grateful to EMBRAPA Milho e Sorgo, Sete Lagoas, MG, Brazil for supply of the parasitoid specimens.

REFERENCES CITED

1.

T. R. Ashley 1979. Classification and distribution of fall armyworm parasites. Florida Entomol. 62: 114– 123. Google Scholar

2.

P. F. Billingsley 1989. Endpolyploydy and digestion in the midgut of Rhodnius prolixus Stal (Hemiptera: Reduviidae). Ann. Tropical Med. Parasitol. 83: 93–99. Google Scholar

3.

P. F. Billingsley , and M. J. Lehane 1996. Structure and ultrastructure of the insect midgut, pp. 31–54 In M. J. Lehane and P. F. Billingsley [eds.], Biology of the insect midgut. Chapman and Hall, London. Google Scholar

4.

R. C. Bowen 1968. Histochemical studies on two millipede species. Ohio J. Sci. 68: 85–91. Google Scholar

5.

M. L. Bution , and F. H. Caetano 2008. Ileum of the Cephalotes ants: a specialized structure to harbor symbiont microorganisms. Micron 39: 897–909. Google Scholar

6.

M. L. Bution , F. H. Caetano , B. B. Fabio , A. T. G. Giovana , and F. J. Zara 2006. Histology and histochemistry of the ventriculus Dolichoderus (=Monacis) bispinosus (Olivier, 1792) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Micron 37: 249–254. Google Scholar

7.

I. Cruz 1995. A lagarta-do-cartucho na cultura do milho. Sete Lagoas, EMBRAPA-CNPMS, Circular Técnica, pp. 21–45. Google Scholar

8.

I. Cruz , M. L. C. Figueiredo , E. P. Gonçalves , D. A. N. Lima , and E. E. Diniz 1997. Efeito da idade de lagartas de Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) no desempenho do parasitóide Campoletis flavicincta (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) e consumo foliar por lagartas parasitadas e não parasitadas. Ann. Soc. Entomol. Brazil 26: 229–234. Google Scholar

9.

I. Cruz , D. A. N. Lima , M. L. C. Figueiredo , and F. H. Valicente 1995. Aspectos biológicos do parasitóide Campoletis flavicincta (Ashmead) criados em lagartas de Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith). Ann. Soc. Entomol. Brazil 24: 201–208. Google Scholar

10.

L. C. Cruz , V. A. Araújo , M. C. Q. Fialho , J. E. Serrão , and C. A. Neves in press. Proliferation and cell death in the midgut of the stingless bee Melipona quadrifasciata anthidioides (Apidae: Meliponini) during metamorphosis. Apidologie:  http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs13592-013-0196-7Google Scholar

11.

C. Cruz-Landim 2009. Abelhas: Morfologia e função de sistemas. 1st edn. UNESP Rio Claro. Google Scholar

12.

C. Cruz-Landim , and M. L. S. Mello 1970. Post-embryonic changes in Melipona quadrifasciata anthidioides Lep. IV. Development of the digestive tract. Bol. Zool. Biol. Marinha. 27: 229–263. Google Scholar

13.

C. Cruz-Landim , and R. L. M. Silca-De-Moraes 2000. Morte cellular programada em abelhas como uma forma de redirecionar a morfologia e a fisiologia adaptativa. 48 pp. Editora e Tipografia Costa, Rio Claro. Google Scholar

14.

C. Cruz-Landim , R. L. M. Silva-De-Moraes , and J. E. Serrão 1996. Ultrastructural aspects of epithelial renewal in the midgut of adult worker bees (Hymenoptera, Apidae). J. Comp. Biol. 1: 209–240. Google Scholar

15.

S. T. B. Dequech , R. F. P. Silva , and L. M. Fiuza 2005. Interaction between Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), Campoletis flavicincta (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) and Bacillus thuringiensis aizawai, in laboratory. Neotrop. Entomol. 34: 937–944. Google Scholar

16.

K. M. Fernandes , V. A. Araujo , J. E. Serrão , G. F. Martins , L. A. O. Campos , and C. A. Neves 2010. Quantitative analysis of the digestive and Melípona quadrifasciata anthidioides (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Sociobiology 56: 489–504. Google Scholar

17.

M. C. Q. Fialho , J. C. Zanuncio , C. A. Neves , F. S. Ramalho , and J. E. Serrão 2009. Ultrastructure of the digestive cells in the midgut of the predator Brontocoris tabidus (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) after different feeding periods on prey and plants. Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 102: 119–127. Google Scholar

18.

M. C. Q. Fialho , W. R. Terra , N. R. Moreira , J. C. Zanuncio , and J. E. Serrão in press. Ultrastructure and Immunolocalization of Digestive Enzymes in the Midgut of Podisus nigrispinus (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Arthropod Structure Dev. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asd.2013.03.002Google Scholar

19.

A. A. P. França , S. N. Dessaune , J. E. Serrão , and C. A. Neves 2006. The regenerative cell in the midgut of Melipona quadrifasciata anthidioides (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Meliponini): a comparative study of workers and queens. Brazilian J. Morphol. Sci. 23: 401–404. Google Scholar

20.

I. Gajger , Z. Kozaric , D. Berta , S. Nejedli , and Z. Petrinec 2011 .Effect of the Herbal preparation Nozevict on the mid-gut structure of honeybees (Apis melífera) infected with Nosema sp. Spores. Veterinary Med. 56: 344–351. Google Scholar

21.

R. S. Hakim , K. Baldwin , and G. Smagghe 2010. Regulation of midgut growth, development, and metamorphosis. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 55: 593–608. Google Scholar

22.

M. Klowden 2007. Physiological Systems in insects. 2nd ed. Academic Press. 688 pp. Google Scholar

23.

S. Marques-Silva , J. E. Serrão , and J. M. S. Mezêncio 2005. Peritrophic membrane protein in the larval stingless bee Melipona quadrifasciata anthidioides: immunolocalization of secretory sites. Acta Histochemica 107: 23–30. Google Scholar

24.

J. Moreira , C. A. Neves , V. A. Araújo , A. P. A. Araújo , L. C. Cruz , P. A. Moreira , and S. L. Rocha 2008. Digestive system morphology of the Nasutitermes rotundatus Holmgren. Sociobiology 51: 536– 578. Google Scholar

25.

C. A. Neves , L. L. Bhering , J. E. Serrão , and L. B. Gitirana 2002. FMRFamide like midgut endocrine cells during the metamorphosis in Melipona quadrifasciata anthidioides (Hymenoptera. Apidae). Micron 33: 453–460. Google Scholar

26.

C. A. Neves , L. B. Gitirana , and J. E. Serrão 2003. Ultrastructural study of the metamorphosis in the midgut of Melipona quadrifasciata athidioides (Apidae. Meliponini) worker. Sociobiology 41: 443–459. Google Scholar

27.

P. N. Patel , and M. E. M. Habib 1987. Biological studies on Campoletis flavicincta (Ashmead, 1890) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae), an endoparasite of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (Abbot & Smith, 1797) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 104: 28–35. Google Scholar

28.

D. O. Pinheiro , R. J. Silva , and E. A. Gregorio 2006. Morphometry of the midgut epithelium of Diatraea saccharalis Fabricius, 1974 (Lepidoptera) parasitized by Cotesia xavipes Cameron, 1891 (Hymenoptera). J. Invert. Pathol. 93: 60–62. Google Scholar

29.

D. O. Pinheiro , R. J. Silva , I. Quagio-Grassiotto , and E. A. Gregorio 2003. Morphometric study of the midgut epithelium in larvae of Diatraea saccharalis Fabricius (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Neotrop. Entomol. 32: 453–459. Google Scholar

30.

H. Raes , M. Verbeke , W. Meulemans , and W. Coster 1994. Organization and ultrastructure of the regenerative crypts in the midgut of the adult worker honeybee (Apis melifera L.). Tissue Cell 26: 231– 238. Google Scholar

31.

T. T. S. Schumaker , P. T. Cristofoletti , and W. R. Terra 1993. Properties and compartimentalization of digestive carboidrases and proteases in Scaptotrigona bipunctata (Apidae: Meliponinae) larvae. Apidologie 24: 3–17. Google Scholar

32.

J. E. Serrão , and C. Cruz-Landim 1995. Gut structures in adult workers of necrophorous neotropical stingless bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Meliponinae). Entomol. Gen. 19: 261–265. Google Scholar

33.

J. E. Serrão , and C. Cruz-Landim 1996a. A comparative study of digestive cells in different midgut regions of stingless bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Meliponinae). J. Adv. Zool. 17: 01–06. Google Scholar

34.

J. E. Serrão , and C. Cruz-Landim 1996b. A specialized midgut region in stingless bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Meliponinae). Biocell 20: 227–234. Google Scholar

35.

J. E. Serrão , and C. Cruz-Landim 2000. Ultrastructure of the midgut epithelium of Meliponinae larvae with different developmental stages and diets. J. Apicult. Res. 39: 9–17. Google Scholar

36.

R. E. Snodgrass 1935. Principles of insect morphology. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar

37.

S. Takashima , K. L. Adams , P. A. Ortiz , C. T. Ying , R. Moridzadeh , A. Younossi-Hartenstein , and V. Hartenstein 2011. Development of the Drosophila entero-endocrine lineage and its specification by the Notch signaling pathway. Develop. Biol. 353: 161–172. Google Scholar

38.

A. D. Teixeira , M. C. Q. Fialho , J. C. Zanuncio , F. S. Ramalho , and J. E. Serrão in press. Degeneration and cell regeneration in the midgut of Podisus nigrispinus (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) during post-embryonic development. Arthropod Structure Develop.,  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asd.2013.02.004Google Scholar

39.

W. R. Terra 1990. Evolution of digestive systems of insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 35: 181–200. Google Scholar

40.

C. F. B. Valotto , H. H. G. Silva , G. Cavasin , R. Geris , E. R. Filho , and I. G. Silva 2011. Alterações ultraestruturais em larvas de Aedes aegypti submetidas ao diterpeno labdano, isolado de Copaifera reticulata (Leguminosae), e à uma fraçõo rica em taninos de Magonia pubescens (Sapindaceae). Rev. Soc. Brasileira Med. Trop. 44: 194–200. Google Scholar

41.

T. Vuocolo , C. H. Eisemann , R. D. Pearson , P. Willadsen , and R. L. Tellam 2001. Identification and molecular characterization of a peritrophin gene, peritrophin-48, from the myiasis fly Chrysomya bezziana. Ins. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 31: 919–32. Google Scholar

42.

D. Zitnan , I. Sauman , and F. Sehnal 1993. Peptidergic innervation and endocrine cells of insect midgut. Arch. Ins. Biochem. Physiol. 22: 113–132. Google Scholar

43.

E. Zudaire , S. J. Simpson , I. L. Ilha , and M. Montuenga 2004. Dietary influences over proliferating cell nuclear antigen expression in the locust midgut. J. Exp. Biol. 207: 2255–226. Google Scholar
Wagner G. Gonçalves, Kenner M. Fernandes, Max P. Gonçalves, Clóvis A. Neves, Gustavo F. Martins, José C. Zanuncio, and José E. Serrão "The Midgut of the Parasitoid Campoletis flavicincta (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae)," Florida Entomologist 96(3), 1016-1022, (1 September 2013). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.096.0340
Published: 1 September 2013
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES


Share
SHARE
KEYWORDS
células digestivas
células regenerativas
digestive cells and regenerative cells
epitelio
epithelium
morfometría
morphometric
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top