Translator Disclaimer
1 September 2013 Life Cycle, Development, and Culture of Xyleborus glabratus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae)
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The redbay ambrosia beetle, Xyleborus glabratus Eichhoff (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae), is a wood-boring pest that transmits the fungal pathogen Raffaelea lauricola, the causal agent of laurel wilt disease in American Lauraceae. This study documents the gallery formation patterns of X. glabratus as well as its life cycle and development at 25 ± 2 °C in logs of 3 natural hosts: avocado (Persea americana), redbay (P. borbonia) and swampbay (P. palustris). Females were observed to excavate galleries perpendicular to the tree trunk; galleries were characterized by a main entrance tunnel, from which branched secondary tunnels that, in turn, gave rise to tertiary tunnels. By dissecting infested logs daily, the length of time was determined for each developmental stage, and found to be comparable in all 3 hosts. Eggs were first encountered in avocado, redbay, and swampbay at 7, 11, and 10 days after gallery initiation (agi), respectively; larvae at 14, 20, and 14 days agi; pupae at 24, 26, and 26 days agi; and teneral adults at 31, 30, and 27 days agi. Despite comparable rates of development in all hosts, there were fewer progeny per female produced in avocado. Oviposition by the founding female extended over a broad time-span, and all stages were observed in the gallery at 1 month agi. Three larval instars were present, with mean head capsule widths of 0.21, 0.26, and 0.37 mm, respectively. Long term rearing of X. glabratus was achieved on swampbay logs soaked in water prior to infestation. Emergence of new females from logs was first observed at 60 d agi, indicating that teneral adults remain in hosts for ∼1 month prior to dispersal. Emergence continued for up to 240 days, with maximum emergence observed between 120–150 days agi.

The redbay ambrosia beetle, Xyleborus glabratus Eichhoff (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae), is an Asian species recently introduced into North America. It was first detected in 2002 near Savannah, Georgia (Rabagalia et al. 2006), and by 2004 its association with laurel wilt disease had been recognized (Fraedrich et al. 2008). Xyleborus glabratus is a minute wood-boring beetle with females 2.1–2.4 mm in length, 3 times as long as wide and dark brown to black in color. Males are rare, flightless, 1.8 mm in length, and 2.5 times as long as wide (Rabagalia et al. 2006). It is thought that X. glabratus was introduced via solid wood packing material, and the species constitutes the twelfth non-native ambrosia beetle known to become established in the United States since 1990 (Mayfield & Thomas 2009). Since its introduction a decade ago, X. glabratus has invaded 6 states in the southeastern Coastal Plain, including North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, and Mississippi (USDA-FS 2012). The beetle is native to India, Japan, Myanmar, and Taiwan, but in these countries X. glabratus is not associated with tree disease (Beaver & Liu 2010) and appears to be a host generalist, since it has been recorded from a variety of plant families: Lauraceae [Lindera latifolia Hook, f., Litsaea elongata (Nees) Benth. et Hook. f., and Phoebe lanceolata (Wall. ex Nees) Nees]; Dipterocarpaceae (Shorea robusta C. F. Gaertn); Fagaceae [Lithocarpus edulis (Makino) Nakai]; and Fabaceae [Leucaena glauca (L.) Benth.] (Rabaglia et al. 2006).

Raffaelea lauricola T.C. Harr. Fraedrich & Aghayeva is the primary fungal symbiont of X. glabratus and the confirmed etiologic agent of laurel wilt disease in American Lauraceae (Fraedrich et al. 2008; Hanula et al. 2008). Tree species thus far identified as susceptible to laurel wilt include avocado (Persea americana Mill.), redbay [P. borbonia (L.) Spreng.], swampbay [P. palustris (Raf.) Sarg.], silkbay (P. humilis Nash), sassafras [Sassafras albidum (Nutt.) Nees], pondspice [hitsea aestivalis (L.) Fernald], pondberry [Lindera melissifolia (Walter) Blume], Northern spicebush [Lindera benzoin (L.) Blume], camphor tree [Cinnamomum camphora (L.) J. Presl], and California bay laurel [Umbellularia californica (Hook & Arn.) Nutt.], but additional Lauraceae are potentially at risk in Mexico, Central and South America, and the Caribbean Basin (Fraedrich et al. 2008; Mayfield et al. 2008; Smith et al. 2009a, 2009b; Peña et al. 2012; Mayfield et al. 2013). Laurel wilt disease is responsible for high mortality of native Persea species and for the death of backyard and commercial avocado trees in Florida (Carrillo et al. 2012, FDACS 2012). Consequently, the beetle and its fungal symbiont are considered a serious threat to both native forest ecosystems and commercial avocado production (Crane et al. 2008; FDACS 2012). To date, X. glabratus is the only confirmed vector of this pathogen, but other Scolytinae may be involved (Carrillo et al. 2012). The laurel wilt epidemic, including our current understanding of the mycopathogen, the beetle vector, and the susceptible host trees has been the subject of a recent review (Kendra et al. 2013).

Behaviorally, populations of X. glabratus established in the United States are atypical for ambrosia beetles in the tribe Xyleborini, particularly with respect to host selection. The beetle is capable of attacking live, apparently healthy trees, and thus far appears to be restricted to hosts within the Lauraceae. Most ambrosia beetles are generalists that colonize dead or moribund trees, and as a result, are attracted to ethanol (Miller & Rabaglia 2009), a semiochemical indicative of tree decay; however, since X. glabratus is a primary colonizer, it is not attracted to ethanol (Hanula et al. 2008, 2011). The only known long-range attractants for X. glabratus are host-based volatiles (kairomones), primarily sesquiterpenes (Hanula & Sullivan 2008; Kendra et al. 2011, 2012b, 2012c). Females of X. glabratus have a unimodal dispersal peak (Brar et al. 2012), engaging in host-seeking flight during the late afternoon, several h earlier than other species of Xyleborus [e.g., X. ferrugineus (Fabricius) and X. affinis Eichhoff] (Kendra et al. 2012a, 2012b). Since X. glabratus is not an economic pest in its native range, the species has not been studied well. To better understand the vector-pathogen-host complex, and to make informed decisions regarding management strategies, knowledge of the X. glabratus life cycle and development in U.S. hosts is required. Here we report for the first time (1) the life cycle and development of X. glabratus using redbay, swampbay, and avocado hosts under controlled laboratory conditions, (2) the characteristics of the gallery pattern excavated by a colonizing female, and (3) a method for long-term rearing of X. glabratus using conditioned host logs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Insects

Redbay trees with high infestations of X. glabratus were collected from Austin Cary Memorial Forest, Alachua County, Florida and Ordway-Swisher Biological Station, Putnam County, Florida to provide initial insects for laboratory investigations. The trunks of infested trees were cut at the base and sectioned into 40–45 cm logs. Logs were transferred immediately to the laboratory and 4–6 logs were placed in a beetle-emergence container. Emergence containers consisted of 32-gallon (121-L) refuse containers with tightly fitting lids (Rubbermaid Roughneck, Pleasant Prairie, Wisconsin), with a clear plastic collection cup attached to the side of the container near the neck. Each collection cup was partitioned into 2 compartments using plankton netting (150 micron, BioQuip Products, Rancho Dominguez, California). A manuka oil lure (Synergy Semiochemicals Corp., Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada) was placed in the lower compartment of the collection cup and replaced every 14 days, based on experimental determinations of attraction efficacy for this lure (Kendra et al. 2012c). Adult beetles were collected in the upper compartment of the cup which contained a moist paper towel to maintain high humidity. The permeable partition allowed movement of attractant volatiles released from the manuka lures, but prevented the beetles from direct contact with the lure. The containers were placed on their sides on a wire-frame shelf unit, such that the collection cups were facing downwards. A total of 20 beetle-collection containers were maintained in 2 rearing rooms at the Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Rearing rooms were maintained at 25 ± 2 °C in complete darkness. Beetles were collected daily, with fully sclerotized (dark brown to black) X. glabratus females sorted and used for developmental studies.

Life Cycle and Development

Life cycle and developmental studies of X. glabratus were conducted using artificially infested logs of redbay, avocado, and swampbay. Logs of avocado cv. ‘Booth 7’ (Guatemalan-West Indian hybrid) were obtained from the University of Florida Tropical Research and Education Center, Homestead, Florida. A certified municipal arborist in Volusia County, Florida provided samples of redbay and swampbay, and the species identification was confirmed at the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry, Gainesville, Florida. All logs were cut from healthy trees with no symptoms of laurel wilt nor visible signs of X. glabratus attack. Developmental studies in avocado were conducted during Sep–Oct 2010, in redbay during Mar–Apr 2011, and in swampbay during May–Jun 2011.

Logs of 4.5–6.5 cm diam. were cut into 8–10 cm lengths and then soaked in tap water for 48 h. For each host, 150 logs were used. To maintain moisture content, each log was kept standing upright in water in a 946 mL clear plastic container (American Plastics, Gainesville, Florida) throughout the experiment; the exposed water surface was covered with plankton netting (as above) to exclude test insects. To infest logs, 20 adult females were placed on the bark of each log and allowed to bore. Logs were kept in an incubator (Precision® illuminated incubator, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts) at 25 ± 2 °C in complete darkness. Each day, 3 logs were selected at random, split into small longitudinal pieces to expose beetle galleries, and each gallery searched thoroughly for insects. The duration of each study was approximately 40 days or until the teneral (newly emerged, light brown) adult stage was observed. Data recorded from each log consisted of the number of successful borings, the gallery pattern, and the number of each developmental stage. Boring was considered successful if, after removal of the outer bark, the gallery extended though the vascular cambium and into the underlying pith (dead xylem or heartwood).

Description of Life Stages

Throughout the developmental study outlined above, specimens of X. glabratus in the egg, larval, and pupal stages were collected and preserved in 70% ethyl alcohol. Photo-documentation and morphological descriptions were taken for each stage, and the number of instars was determined by measuring head capsule width with an ocular micrometer under a binocular microscope. To ascertain measurements from the first instars, eggs were collected from galleries 20 d after infestation. Eggs were placed individually on moist tissue in a Petri dish (50 × 9 mm, BD Falcon, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey), and head capsule width was measured upon larval emergence.

Gallery Pattern

Redbay logs (5–6 cm diam.) heavily infested with X. glabratus were collected from Ordway-Swisher Biological Station. Entry holes of X. glabratus were initially identified and marked based on size (0.8 mm diam.) (Hanula et al. 2008; Mayfield & Hanula 2012), and then confirmed by presence of an adult female within the gallery. In line with an entrance hole, logs were dissected horizontally (cross-sectioned) with a miter saw to expose the gallery system. Galleries were then traced on transparency sheets and the structure and pattern of the gallery were described.

Culture on Swampbay Logs

To develop laboratory rearing methods for X. glabratus, and to obtain initial data on reproductive potential, time of adult emergence (dispersal), and longevity of rearing substrates, beetle colonies were established on freshly collected, healthy logs of swampbay. A total of 34 logs [mean (± SE) dimensions of 9.5 (± 1.6) cm length × 5.9 (± 0.2) cm diam.] were soaked in tap water for 48 h, blotted dry, and placed upright into individual 946 mL clear plastic containers (American Plastics) containing 100 mL of water. As before, plankton netting was used as a barrier above the water, and 20 females were placed on each log. Logs were kept in an incubator (as above) and water level was maintained throughout the experiment. The number of females emerging per log was counted at intervals of 7–14 days, and the duration of the experiment was 240 days, conducted during Apr–Dec 2011.

Statistical Analysis

SAS procedures were used to perform all statistical analyses (SAS Institute 2004). Data for successful boring with the 3 hosts were analyzed using Proc GLIMMIX (response variable = successful boring, response distribution = binomial, fixed effects = different hosts). Number of individuals per developmental stage observed in different hosts were compared using Proc GLIMMIX (response variable = number of individuals per developmental stage, response distribution = poisson, fixed effects = different hosts, random effects = time of observation). Monthly emergence from the rearing study was analyzed using Proc GLM with response variable as monthly emergence, and days as fixed effects, N = 34. Means were separated using the Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons test. Regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between instar and head capsule width. We applied Dyar's rule in the form of a linear regression model Log y = a + bx, where y = head capsule width, and x = instar (Dyar 1890; Klingenberg & Zimmerman 1992).

RESULTS

Life Cycle and Development

In avocado logs, eggs were first observed at 7 days, larvae at 14 days, pupae at 24 days, and teneral adults at 31 days after gallery initiation (agi) (Fig. 1A). In redbay, those sequential stages were observed at 11, 20, 26, and 30 d agi (Fig. 1B); and with swampbay, the corresponding observations were made at 10, 14, 26, and 27 d agi (Fig. 1C). Since developmental times were similar with all 3 hosts, data were combined to construct a generalized life cycle for X. glabratus at 25 °C in Persea hosts. Mean ± SE pre-oviposition period was 9.3 ± 1.1 d; and duration of the egg, larval, and pupal stages were 6.6 ± 1.4 d, 9.3 ± 1.7 d, and 5.0 ± 0.8 d, respectively. All 4 developmental stages were found concurrently from about day 30 and thereafter (Fig. 1). Since eggs could be observed on most consecutive days, especially with redbay (Fig. 1B) and swampbay (Fig 1C), it appears as though oviposition in X. glabratus is fairly continuous, rather than in discrete batches. There were significant differences among hosts with respect to percent successful boring (F 2, 287 = 10.35; P < 0.0001) (Table 1), with less boring in redbay and swampbay logs compared to avocado logs (Table 1). There were significant differences among the numbers of eggs (F 2, 237 = 43.19; P < 0.0001), larvae (F 2, 287 = 75.68; P < 0.0001), pupae (F 2, 287 = 54.84; P < 0.0001) and teneral adults (F 2, 237 = 45.72; P < 0.0001) observed in redbay, swampbay and avocado. Highest numbers of individuals in each developmental stage were observed in swampbay (Table 1).

Fig. 1.

Presence of Xyleborus glabratus in logs from host trees at 25 ± 2 °C and 24 h dark conditions. Graphs depict observations made daily for 40 days of developmental stages in (A) avocado, Persea americana, (B) redbay, P. borbonia, and (C) swampbay, P. palustris.

f01_1158.jpg

TABLE 1.

DEVELOPMENT OF XYLEBORUS GLABRATUS IN LOGS OF 3 SPECIES OF PERSEA UNDER CONTROLLED LABORATORY CONDITIONS FOR 40 DAYS.

t01_1158.gif

Developmental Stages

Egg: White, translucent and ovoid. Mean (± SE) length and width were 0.63 (±0.004) and 0.27 (±0.003) mm, respectively (n=44). Larva: Legless, dull whitish in color with head capsule white. Measurements of larval head capsule showed 3 peaks (Fig. 2), indicating 3 instars, and there was no difference in head capsule size based on developmental host (Fig. 3, Table 2). Linear regression of head capsule data (applying Dyar's rule of geometric progression of capsule width with successive instars) yielded high R2 values (Fig. 3), supporting our conclusion of 3 instars for X. glabratus. Pupa: white, exarate, typical of that reported for other Scolytinae.

Gallery Pattern

Females of X. glabratus excavate the gallery by pushing out the macerated woody tissue, which gives rise to distinctive sawdust sticks at the entrance hole. The gallery system is constructed perpendicular to the trunk, in a horizontal plane, and consists of a primary entrance tunnel that, over time, branches into 2–5 secondary tunnels, from which 0–3 tertiary tunnels may also branch (Fig. 4). In redbay logs with a diam of 5–6 cm, the mean (± SE) length of a primary tunnel was 8.5 (± 0.8) mm (n = 24). The mean (± SE) gallery length and width recorded was 32.1 (± 2.0) and 28.0 (± 2.1) cm, respectively (n = 24). Eggs were observed at the distal ends of secondary and tertiary tunnels, in groups of 1–8, indicating that these portions of the tunnel system function as brood galleries. This was also the site where pupae were observed.

Culture on Swampbay Logs

Xyleborus glabratus was reared successfully on pre-soaked swampbay logs. Over the period of study, a total of 1,947 beetles emerged from 34 logs, with mean ± SE emergence per log equaling 57.3 ± 5.7 females. Beetle emergence was first observed at 60 d agi, and maximum emergence was seen between 120–150 d agi. Emergence continued up through 240 d agi, at which time the ex periment was terminated (Fig. 5). It is likely that there were overlapping generations of beetles developing within these logs. Since observations were made at 7–14 d intervals, it was not possible to assess if newly emerged females reinfested the same logs.

DISCUSSION

Redbay and swampbay are the 2 ecologically important trees in the family Lauraceae that have been severely affected by laurel wilt, with over 90% mortality reported in some infested areas (Fraedrich et al. 2008). The disease has killed numerous backyard avocado trees throughout Florida (Carrillo et al. 2012), and in the spring of 2012 laurel wilt was detected in the commercial avocado production areas of Miami-Dade County, FL (FDACS 2012). We conducted controlled laboratory studies to investigate and compare the development of X. glabratus in these 3 primary hosts. Host tree species (and physiological state of an individual tree), is likely to affect the suitability of wood as a substrate for fungal growth. The mycelium consumed by ambrosia beetles derives nutrition from materials stored within the wood, primarily dead xylem tissue (Panshin & De-Zeeuw 1977; McIntosh 1994). In addition to nutritional quality, fungal growth will also depend upon favorable temperature, levels of respiratory gases, moisture content, and other physical/chemical properties of the host internal environment (Rudinsky 1962). Although similar boring and development times were observed with the 3 hosts evaluated in this study, there were differences in the number of X. glabratus progeny produced. Our results indicate that avocado may be a less suitable reproductive host than swampbay, a finding consistent with results reported by Carrillo et al. (2012). Since our laboratory study used destructive sampling, follow-up studies are needed with live trees to better understand the tritrophic interaction among host species, insect vector, and fungal symbiont under natural field conditions.

In terms of insect behavior, field tests have found similar attraction of X. glabratus to cut bolts of redbay, swampbay, and avocado (Hanula et al. 2008; Kendra et al. 2013). With avocado bolts representative of the 3 horticultural races (Mexican, Guatemalan, and West Indian), there was no significant difference in attraction of X. glabratus in field tests; and in laboratory bioassays, a high percentage of females (∼80%) readily bored into all 3 cultivars (Kendra et al. 2011). Avocado emits the same sesquiterpene kairomones as redbay and swampbay (Niogret et al. 2011), and the combined results of these studies suggest that avocado is just as likely to be attacked as native Persea species, even though it may not be the best host for reproduction. Beetle reproduction is not required for transmission of the pathogen, only host recognition and successful boring. However, once the optimal reproductive hosts (i.e., swampbay trees) become scarce in south Florida, one would assume there would be strong selection for beetles capable of successful reproduction in avocado. It remains to be seen how the epidemiology of laurel wilt disease in avocado groves will compare to that played out in U.S. forest ecosystems.

Fig. 2.

Frequency distribution of head capsule width measurements from larvae of Xyleborus glabratus reared in (A) avocado, Persea americana (n = 255), (B) redbay, P. borbonia (n = 100), and (C) swampbay, P. palustris (n = 157).

f02_1158.jpg

Fig. 3.

Linear regression of mean head capsule width as a function of larval instar for Xyleborus glabratus.

f03_1158.jpg

The rate of development observed for X. glabratus in this study is similar to that reported in the literature for other species of Xyleborus. For example, our generalized model estimates the average developmental time for egg, larval, and pupal stages of X. glabratus to be 6.6, 9.3, and 5.0 d; and the corresponding stages in X. ferrugineus reared on artificial diet have been observed to take 4.5, 8.1, and 4.6 days (Kingsolver & Norris 1977a). Likewise, other congeneric species examined are known to have 3 larval instars, e.g., X. ferrugineus (Norris & Chu 1985) and X. celsus Eichhoff (Gagne & Kearby 1979), and extended periods of oviposition leading to overlapping generations, e.g., X. pfeili (Ratzeburg) (Mizuno & Kajimura 2002). Of particular note in our study is that teneral adults were observed in dissected galleries at ∼30 days agi, but adults did not emerge from intact logs until ∼60 days agi. This observation indicates that female X. glabratus remain within their natal trees for an extended period of time prior to dispersing. That ‘lag’ time may be required for full sclerotization of the cuticle, sexual maturation, mating with sibling males, garnering fungal spores (conidia) within mandibular mycangia, and procuring adequate energy stores necessary for engaging in host-seeking flight. In essence, females must ‘fast’ after leaving the natal tree, going without food during the span of dispersal flight and initial gallery formation until symbiotic fungal gardens can be cultured within new host trees.

TABLE 2.

HEAD CAPSULE WIDTH MEASURED FOR THE 3 LARVAL INSTARS OF XYLEBORUS GLABRATUS REARED IN LOGS OF 3 SPECIES OF PERSEA.

t02_1158.gif

The extensive tree-like branching patterns we documented for the galleries of X. glabratus are not unlike those reported for other Xyleborus; however, there are species-specific differences as to the location of the brood galleries (Kajimura & Hiji 1994; Kingsolver & Norris 1977a). Gallery size has been shown to be an important factor in determining fitness of ambrosia beetles. In both Xylosandrus mutilatus Blandford (Karimura & Hijii 1994) and Xyleborus pfeili (Mizuno & Kajimura 2002), there is a positive correlation between overall gallery length and number of offspring. This implies that increased gallery length results in increased fungal growth, and that successful brood development is directly related to the quantity of symbiotic fungus (Kingsolver & Norris 1977b). In other words, it is adaptive for ambrosia beetles to construct extensive gallery networks within host trees, and this requires a host of large diam. With X. glabratus, field surveys of infested swampbay trees indicate that host-seeking females have a ‘diameter preference’; there is a strong positive correlation between diam of host tree and density of beetle entrance holes (Kendra et al. 2013). Assessment of host diam by females may potentially be obtained from visual cues, from proximo-distal distributions of attractive sesquiterpenes (Niogret et al. 2013), or from both. Regardless, the consequence of this behavior is that the oldest (largest diam) trees are typically the first to be attacked, and over the next few years, the vector colonizes progressively smaller diam trees until the site is depleted (Kendra et al. 2013).

CONCLUSION

The redbay ambrosia beetle is firmly established in the southeastern U.S. where it vectors Raffaelea lauricola, the fungus responsible for laurel wilt, a lethal disease that impacts both forestry and agriculture. Its range continues to expand, and despite intensive research over the past few years, no efficacious and economical means of control have been identified. Management of laurel wilt disease and its insect vector will require a holistic approach, which is contingent upon a better understanding of the insect vector, its symbiotic fungus, and the susceptible host Lauraceae. This publication reports a laboratory rearing method to facilitate experimental research on X. glabratus. It also provides information on the basic biology, life cycle, and developmental stages of the pest on the 3 primary hosts impacted in the state of Florida.

Fig. 4.

Two examples of gallery patterns excavated by female Xyleborus glabratus in redbay, Persea borbonia.

f04_1158.jpg

Fig. 5.

Emergence (mean ± SE) of adult female Xyleborus glabratus from logs of swampbay, Persea palustris in which they were reared at 25 ± 2 °C and 24 h dark conditions over a period of 240 days (n = 34). Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different based on Tukey-Kramer test for difference of means (P < 0.05; F 5,165 = 19.26; P < 0.0001).

f05_1158.jpg

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We gratefully acknowledge Don Spence, certified municipal arborist, Volusia County Florida for providing swampbay and redbay wood. We gratefully acknowledge James Colee (IFAS Statistics, University of Florida, Gainesville) for help with analysis of experimental data. We are also grateful to Jason Smith and Jiri Hulcr (SFRC, University of Florida, Gainesville) for critical reviews of the manuscript. This research was supported by a SCRI grant to Dr. R. C. Ploetz (TREC, University of Florida, Homestead).

REFERENCES CITED

1.

R. A. Beaver , and L. Y. Liu 2010. An annotated synopsis of Taiwanese bark and ambrosia beetles, with new synonymy, new combinations and new records (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). Zootaxa 2602: 1–47. Google Scholar

2.

G. S. Brar , J. L. Capinera , S. McLean , P. E. Kendra , R. C. Ploetz , and J. E. Peña 2012. Effect of trap size, trap height, and age of lure on sampling Xyleborus glabratus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae), and its flight periodicity and seasonality. Florida Entomol. 95: 1003–1011. Google Scholar

3.

D. Carrillo , R. E. Duncan , and J. E. Peña 2012. Ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) that breed in avocado wood in Florida. Florida Entomol. 95: 573–579. Google Scholar

4.

J. H. Crane , J. E. PeÑA , and J. L. Osborne 2008. Redbay ambrosia beetle-laurel wilt pathogen: A potential major problem for the Florida avocado industry, HS 1136. Hort. Sci. Dept., University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. < http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/HS379Google Scholar

5.

H. G. Dyar 1890. The number of molts of lepidopterous larvae. Psyche 5: 420–422. Google Scholar

6.

FDACS. 2012. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services identifies laurel wilt disease in avocado production area of Miami-Dade County, Press Release 1 May 2012. < http://www.freshfromflorida.com/newsroom/press/2012/05012012.htmlGoogle Scholar

7.

S. W. Fraedrich , T. C. Harrington , R. J. Rabaglia , M. D. Ulyshen , A. E. Mayfield III , J. L. Hanula , J. M. Eickwort , and D. R. Miller 2008. Afungal symbiont of the redbay ambrosia beetle causes a lethal wilt in redbay and other Lauraceae in southeastern USA. Plant Dis. 92: 215–224. Google Scholar

8.

J. A. Gagne , and W. H. Rearby 1979. Life history, development, and insect-host relationships of Xyleborus celsus (Coleoptera : Scolytidae) in Missouri. Canadian Entomol. 111: 295–305. Google Scholar

9.

J. L. Hanula , A. E. Mayfield III, S. W. Fraedrich , and R. J. Rabaglia 2008. Biology and host association of redbay ambrosia beetle, Xyleborus glabratus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae), exotic vec- tor of laurel wilt killing redbay (Persea borbonia) trees in the Southeastern United States. J. Econ. Entomol. 101: 1276–1286. Google Scholar

10.

J. L. Hanula , and B. Sullivan 2008. Manuka oil and phoebe oil are attractive baits for Xyleborus glabratus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae), the vector of laurel wilt. Environ. Entomol. 37: 1403–1409. Google Scholar

11.

J. L. Hanula , M. D. Ulyshen , and S. Horn 2011. Effect of trap type, trap position, time of year, and beetle density on captures of the redbay ambrosia beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). J. Econ. Entomol. 104: 501–508. Google Scholar

12.

H. Kajimura , and N. Hijii 1994. Reproduction and resource utilization of the ambrosia beetle, Xylosandrus mutilatus, in field and experimental populations. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 71: 121–132. Google Scholar

13.

P. E. Kendra , W. S. Montgomery , J. Niogret , J. E. Peña , J. L. Capinera , G. Brar , N. D. Epsky , and R. R. Heath 2011. Attraction of Xyleborus glabratus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) to avocado, lychee, and essential oil lures. J. Chem. Ecol. 37: 932–942. Google Scholar

14.

P. E. Kendra , W. S. Montgomery , J. Niogret , M. A. Deyrup , L. Guillen , and N. D. Epsky 2012a. Xyleborus glabratus, X. affinis, and X. ferrugineus (Coloeptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae): Electroantennogram responses to host-based attractants and temporal patterns in host-seeking flight. Environ. Entomol. 41: 1597–1605. Google Scholar

15.

P. E. Kendra , W. S. Montgomery , J. S. Sanchez , M. A. Deyrup , J. Niogret , and N. D. Epsky 2012b. Method for collection of live redbay ambrosia beetles, Xyleborus glabratus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). Florida Entomol. 95: 513–516. Google Scholar

16.

P. E. Kendra , W. S. Montgomery , J. Niogret , and N. D. Epsky 2013. An uncertain future for American Lauraceae: A lethal threat from redbay ambrosia beetle and laurel wilt disease (A review). Am. J. Plant Sci. 4: 727–738. Google Scholar

17.

P. E. Kendra , J. Niogret , W. S. Montgomery , J. S. SanChez , M. A. Deyrup , G. E. Pruett , R. C. Ploetz , N. D. Epsky , and R. R. Heath 2012c. Temporal analysis of sesquiterpene emissions from manuka and phoebe oil lures and efficacy for attraction of Xyleborus glabratus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). J. Econ. Entomol. 105: 659–669. Google Scholar

18.

J. G. Kingsolver , and D. M. Norris 1977a. Morphology and development rates of males and females of Xyleborus ferrugineous (Fabr.) (Coleoptera : Scolytidae) during metamorphosis. Intl. J. Insect Morphol. & Embroyl. 6: 31–39. Google Scholar

19.

J. G. Kingsolver , and D. M. Norris 1977b. The interaction of Xyleborus ferrugineous (Coleoptera : Scolytidae) behavior and initial reproduction in relation to its symbiotic fungi. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 70: 1–4. Google Scholar

20.

C. P. Klingenberg , and M. Zimmermann 1992. Dyar's rule and multivariate allometric growth in nine species of water striders (Heteroptera: Gerridae). J. Zool. London 227: 453–464. Google Scholar

21.

A. E. Mayfield III , J. H. Crane , J. A. Smith , J. E. Peña , C. L. Branch , E. D. Ottoson , and M. Hughes 2008. Ability of redbay ambrosia beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) to bore into young avocado (Lauraceae) plants and transmit the laurel wilt pathogen (Raffaelea spp). Florida Entomol. 91: 485–487. Google Scholar

22.

A. E. Mayfield III, and M. C. Thomas 2009. FDACS Pest Alert: The redbay ambrosia beetle, Xyleborus glabratus Eidhhoff (Scolytinae: Curculionidae). < http://www.freshfromflorida.com/pi/pest-alert/xyleborus-glabratus.html>. Google Scholar

23.

A. E. Mayfield III , and J. L. Hanula 2012. Effect of tree species and end seal on attractiveness and utility of cut bolts to the redbay ambrosia beetle and granulate ambrosia beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). J. Econ. Entomol. 105: 461–470. Google Scholar

24.

A. E. Mayfield III, M. MacKenzie , P. G. Cannon , S. W. Oak , S. Horn , J. Hwang , and P. E. Kendra 2013. Suitability of California bay laurel as a potential host for the non-native redbay ambrosia beetle and granulate ambrosia beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). Agr. Forest Entomol. (In press). Google Scholar

25.

R. L. McIntosh 1994. Dispersal and development of the striped ambrosia beetle Trypodendron Lineatum (Oliv.) in industrial sorting and storage areas. MSc. Thesis. The University of British Coloumbia. Google Scholar

26.

D. R. Miller , and R. J. Rabaglia 2009. Ethanol and (-)-α-pinene: Attractant kairomones for bark and ambrosia beetles in the southeastern U. S. J. Chem. Ecol. 35: 435–448. Google Scholar

27.

T. Mizuno , and H. Kajimura 2002. Reproduction of the ambrosia beetle, Xyleborus pfeili (Ratzeburg) (Col., Scolytidae), on semi-artificial diet. J. Appl. Entomol. 126: 455–462. Google Scholar

28.

J. Niogret , P. E. Kendra , N. D. Epsky , and R. R. Heath 2011. Comparative analysis of terpenoid emissions from Florida host trees of the redbay ambrosia beetle, Xyleborus glabratus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). Florida Entomol. 94: 1010–1017. Google Scholar

29.

J. Niogret , N. D. Epsky , E. Q. Schnell , R. J. Schnell , R. R. Heath , A. W. Meerow , and P. E. Kendra 2013. Analysis of sesquiterpene distributions in leaves, branches, and trunks of avocado (Persea americana Mill). American J. Plant Sci. 4: 922–931.. Google Scholar

30.

D. M. Norris , and H. M. Chu 1985. Xyleborus ferrugineus , pp. 303–315 In P. Singh and R. F. Moore [eds.], Handbook of Insect Rearing, vol. I. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Google Scholar

31.

J. E. Peña , D. Carrillo , R. E. Duncan , J. L. Capinera , G. Brar , S. McLean , M. L. Arpaia , E. Focht , J. A. Smith , M. Hughes , and P. E. Kendra 2012. Susceptibility of Persea spp. and other Lauraceae to attack by redbay ambrosia beetle, Xyleborus glabratus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). Florida Entomol. 95: 783–787. Google Scholar

32.

A. J. Panshin , and C. De-Zeeuw 1977. Text book of wood technology: Structure, identification, properties, and uses of the commercial woods of the United States and Canada (4th Ed.). McGraw-Hill, New York. 722 pp. Google Scholar

33.

R. J. Rabaglia , S. A. Dole , and A. I. Cognato 2006. Review of American Xyleborina (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) occurring north of Mexico, with an illustrated key. Ann. Entomol. Soc. of Am. 99: 1034–1056. Google Scholar

34.

J. A. Rudinsky 1962. Ecology of Scolytidae. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 7: 327–348. Google Scholar

35.

SAS INSTITUTE. 2004. SAS system for Windows, release 9.1. SAS Institute, Cary, NC. Google Scholar

36.

J. A. Smith , T. J. Dreaden , A. E. Mayfield III , A. Boone , S. W. Fraedrich , and C. Bates 2009a. First report of laurel wilt disease caused by Raffaelea lauricola on sassafras in Florida and South Carolina. Plant Dis. 93: 1079. Google Scholar

37.

J. A. Smith , L. Mount , A. E. Mayfield III , C. A. Bates , W. A. Lamborn , and S. W. Fraedrich 2009b. First report of laurel wilt disease caused by Raffaelea lauricola on camphor in Florida and Georgia. Plant Dis. 93: 198. Google Scholar

38.

USDA-FS. 2012. Laurel wilt distribution. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Health Protection, Southern Region. < http://www.fs.fed.us/r8/foresthealth/laurelwilt/dist_map.shtmlGoogle Scholar
Gurpreet S. Brar, John L. Capinera, Paul E. Kendra, Stephen McLean, and Jorge E. Peña "Life Cycle, Development, and Culture of Xyleborus glabratus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae)," Florida Entomologist 96(3), 1158-1167, (1 September 2013). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.096.0357
Published: 1 September 2013
JOURNAL ARTICLE
10 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top