Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 December 2013 Abundance and Species Richness of Leafhoppers and Planthoppers (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae and Delphacidae) in Brazilian Maize Crops
Charles Martins De Oliveira, Elizabeth De Oliveira, Isabel Regina Prazeres De Souza, Elcio Alves, William Dolezal, Susana Paradell, Ana Maria Marino De Remes Lenicov, Marina Regina Frizzas
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Insects in the Cicadellidae and Delphacidae families, common in grasses, are an important group of vectors of viruses and mollicutes, which cause diseases in several plant species. The goal of this study was to evaluate the abundance and species richness of Cicadellidae and Delphacidae and the presence of potential vectors of viruses and mollicutes in maize crops in Brazil. Insects were collected using sweep nets in maize crops in 48 counties of 8 states, distributed in 4 regions of Brazil in the yr 2005, 2006 and 2007, with a total of 198 samples. The collected material was screened, and the leafhoppers and planthoppers were identified at the species level. A total of 4233 Cicadellidae specimens, including 30 species, and 205 Delphacidae specimens, including 9 species, were collected. The most abundant species was Dalbulus maidis (Delong & Wolcott) representing 90.1% of leafhoppers and planthoppers. Abundance and species richness differences were observed between the northeast and center-south regions of Brazil. Eight species of leafhoppers and planthoppers were identified as vectors or potential vectors of viruses and mollicutes in maize, although some of these viruses are not reported in Brazil. Among these species, we identified the planthoppers, Caenodelphax teapae (Fowler), Peregrinus maidis Ashmed, Pyrophagus tigrinus Remes Lenicov & Varela and Toya propinqua (Fieber) are experimental vectors of Mal de Río Cuarto virus, which is a quarantine virus in Brazil. Two Cicadellidae species and 3 Delphacidae species were reported for the first time in Brazil.

Species of Cicadellidae and Delphacidae families are widely distributed in the world, including the Americas, usually inhabiting grasses (Nielson 1985; O'Brien & Wilson 1985). Many species of these 2 families are vectors of phytopathogenic virus and mollicutes, which cause severe symptoms in several plant hosts, including maize (Lopes & Oliveira 2004). In Brazil, there is little information about their incidence in maize and their potential as vectors of viruses and mollicutes in this crop.

Studies about identification, biology and ecology of insect vectors of viruses and mollicutes, as well as the epidemiologic characteristics of incidence and damage by the vectored pathogens, are essential to the development of efficient management strategies to control the resulting diseases. Also, knowledge of these aspects is important to mitigate risks regarding the possible introduction of new diseases and or their insect vectors, because Brazil has approximately 15.7 thousand kilometers of frontiers with other South American countries (IBGE 2011).

More than 20 viruses and 2 maize stunting diseases caused by mollicutes have been described in maize crops around the world, and their causal agents are transmitted by insect vectors, mainly leafhoppers, planthoppers, and aphids (Nault 1980; Remes Lenicov et al. 1985; Shurtleff 1992; Thottappilly et al. 1993; Velazquez et al. 2006). In Brazil, the corn leafhopper Dalbulus maidis (Delong & Wolcott) (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) is the insect vector of corn stunt spiroplasma (Spiroplama kunkelii Whitcomb et al.), maize bushy stunt phytoplasma and Maize rayado fino virus, diseases that caused severe losses in commercial maize crops (Massola Júnior et al. 1999; Oliveira et al. 2002a; Oliveira et al. 2003). Other viruses reported in maize in Brazil are: Sugarcane mosaic virus transmitted by the aphid Rhopalosiphum maidis (Fitch) (Hemiptera: Aphididae), one the most efficient and common vector-species in maize, and Maize mosaic virus, transmitted by the planthopper Peregrinus maidis Ashmed (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) (Edwardson & Christie 1991; Waquil et al. 1996; Lopes & Oliveira 2004). Besides these phytopathogens several other important viruses transmitted by leafhoppers and planthoppers have been reported in countries of the Americas. In the USA, there are reports of Maize chlorotic dwarf virus and Maize fine streak virus transmitted mainly by the leafhopper Graminella nigrifrons (Forbes) (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) (Choudhury & Rosenkranz 1983; Nault 1989; Redinbaugh et al. 2002). Also in the USA, Peru and Venezuela the occurrence of Maize stripe virus transmitted by the planthopper P. maidis was described (Gingery et al. 1981). In Argentina, severe outbreaks of Mal de Rio Cuarto virus, transmitted by the planthopper Delphacodes kuscheli Fennah (Hemiptera: Delphacidae), caused severe losses in maize crops (Remes Lenicov et al. 1985; Lenardón et al. 1998; Ornaghi et al. 1999; Truol et al. 2001).

The goal of this survey was to evaluate the abundance and species richness of the Cicadellidae and Delphacidae families in Brazilian maize crops and verify the presence of species, which can become important vectors of new viruses and mollicutes in this crop.

Material and Methods

Sampling locations

Sampling of leafhoppers and planthoppers specimens occurred in the maize experimental stations of Pioneer Seeds in the following counties: Toledo/ Paraná, Passo Fundo/Rio Grande do Sul, Itumbiara/ Goiás, and Balsas/Maranhão, where this cereal is cultivated all yr-long, and in maize commercial crops, in the following states and counties: Minas Gerais (Lavras, Ingaí, Três Corações, Pouso Alegre, São Gonçalo do Sapucaí, São Sebastião da Bela Vista, Pimenta, Alpinópolis, Luz, Santa Juliana, Araxá, Nova Ponte, Uberlândia); Goiás (Itumbiara); São Paulo (Altinópolis); Paraná (Lapa, São Mateus do Sul, Capanema, Cornélio Procópio, Campo Mourão, Toledo, Cafelândia, Santa Tereza do Oeste, Santo Antônio do Sudoeste, Cambe, Barracão, Santa Mariana, Mandaguari, Jurandá, Maringá, Apucarana); Santa Catarina (São José do Cedro, São Miguel do Oeste, Cunha Porã, Iraceminha, Irani, Guaraciaba, Guarujá do Sul, Nova Erechim); Rio Grande do Sul (Frederico Westphalen, Passo Fundo, Pulador, Boa Vista das Missões); Maranhão (Balsas, São Raimundo das Mangabeiras, Tasso Fragoso, Vargem Limpa), and Piauí (Baixa Grande do Ribeiro) (Fig. 1; Table 1). Sampling occurred in Jan 2005 and 2007, and in Feb 2006, except in the states of Maranhão, and Piauí, where sampling occurred in Apr 2005, 2006 and 2007. Samples were collected according to the rainy season and to the maize growing stages in different regions of the country. The period from Oct to Mar concentrates the summer crop and the second maize crop season (“safrinha”) in center-south of Brazil. The period from Apr to Aug concentrates the maize crop in northeastern part of Brazil.

Fig. 1.

Map showing the collection localities of leafhoppers and planthoppers (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae and Delphacidae) in maize in Brazil (see Table 1 for abbreviations of names of localities).

f01_1470.jpg

Insect sampling

The insects were collected using 35cm-diam sweep nets made of voile fabric. Each sample was composed of 3 subsamples collected at 3 distinct sites in the same maize production area. Insects were collected by 30 sweeps of the sweep net between 2 maize rows around 10 m long. In the maize experimental stations 8 to 12 samples were collected (every sample consisted of 3 subsamples). In the counties belonging to the states of Maranhão and Piauí, in the large maize cultivated areas, at least 5 samples were collected. In the other commercial maize crops just 1 sample was taken. The insect samples were collected from maize in different stages of development, with a total of 67 samples in 2005, 72 samples in 2006 and, 59 samples in 2007.

Table 1.

Brazilian localities where leafhoppers and planthoppers (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae and Delphacidae) were sampled on maize.

t01_1470.gif

Insects were transported inside plastic bags in an icebox, later they were kept for 1 h inside a freezer, and then transferred to vials with 70% ethanol. All samples were taken to the Entomology Laboratory of Embrapa Cerrados (Planaltina/ Distrito Federal, Brazil), where leafhoppers and planthoppers were separated from the other insect species by a stereomicroscope at 60X magnification.

Taxonomic identification

Leafhoppers and planthopper specimens were first separated at the morphospecies level and counted. Afterwards they were sent to the Division Entomology at the National University of La Plata (La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina), where the identification at species level was done subfamilies taxonomic keys (Dietrich 2005) and by specific taxonomic keys (Linnavuori 1959; Young 1977; Remes Lenicov 1982; Paradell 1995; Remes Lenicov & Virla 1999). Vouchers of the collected and identified material are deposited in the Entomological Museum of Embrapa Cerrados (CPAC).

Data Analysis

The abundance of each leafhopper and planthopper species was estimated as the average number of collected specimens for each sample in each locality. Estimations of species richness were used to verify sampling effort accuracy in relation to Cicadellidae and Delphacidae species diversity. Species richness was estimated by the non-parametric estimators: Jackknife 1, Jackknife 2, Chao1 and Chao 2. These mathematical equations were, respectively:

e01_1470.gif
where: J1 = Jackknife estimation of the first order ; J2 = Jackknife estimation of the second order; C1 = Chao estimation of the first order; C2 = Chao estimation of the second order; Sobs = total number of species present in n samples; L = number of species that occurred in only 1 sample; n = total number of samples; M = number of species that occurred in only 2 samples; α = number of species represented by only 1 specimen, and b = number of species represented by only 2 specimens (Chao 1984, 1987; Palmer 1991). Estimations of species richness were performed with the data of all the samples obtained in this study and also, separately, for the samples collected in the center-south and in the northeast of Brazil.

The Jaccard similarity index was used to compare the center-south and northeast regions. This mathematical equation was:

e02_1470.gif
where: Jsi = Jaccard's similarity index; α = number of species shared by 2 regions and, b and c = number of species unique to the center-south and the northeast regions, respectively (Jaccard 1908). The similarity between regions was estimated for Delphacidae and Cicadellidae families separately, and also for the total leafhoppers and planthoppers collected.

The species richness and abundance of leafhoppers and planthoppers species were compared between the center-south region, where maize is intensively cultivated, in some places in 2 consecutive seasons per yr, and the northeast region, where maize production has increased in recent yr. These 2 regions differ widely with regard to climate, maize growing seasons and cultivation conditions, which may be reflected in differences in the Cicadellidae and Delphacidae fauna associated with maize.

Results and Discussion

A total of 12,849 insect specimens were collected in 198 samples, of which 4,746 specimens (36.9%) belonged to the Hemiptera. Furthermore, the hemipteran families Cicadellidae (89.2%), and Delphacidae (4.3%) accounted for 93.5% of the specimens collected. In addition, specimens from Achilidae, Aphididae, Cercopidae, Derbidae, Membracidae, Nogodinidae and Psyllidae families were also identified and represented only 6.5% from the total number of hemipteran specimens in the study (Table 2).

Considering only the families Cicadellidae and Delphacidae, in relation to the total number of specimens collected in the 3-yr study, it was observed that the Cicadellidae were more abundant than Delphacidae in the center-south states of Brazil, representing between 94.3 and 99.0% of the specimens collected in this region. On the other hand, the Delphacidae were relatively more abundant in the northeast region, ranging from 45.1 up to 76.0% of the specimens collected.

Regarding species richness of the leafhoppers and planthoppers, a total of 39 species (30 species of Cicadellidae and 9 species of Delphacidae) were identified (Tables 3 and 4). The species richness estimates by the Jackknife1 and 2, and Chao 1 and 2 estimators were, respectively, 49, 48, 43 and 44 species. This result means that between 83.0 and 90.7% of the leafhoppers and planthoppers species present in the maize crop were collected in the 198 samples obtained in this study. For the center-south the corresponding species richness estimates were 46, 49, 38 and 43 species, and for the northeast the corresponding estimates were 28, 33, 33 and 33 species. These results represent between 71.4 and 92.1%, and 63.6 and 75.0% of the species present in maize in the center-south region, and the northeast region, respectively. These richness indexes obtained indicated that sampling effort in relation to the study of the diversity of the Cicadellidae and Delphacidae species was satisfactory.

Table 2.

Average number of specimens of Insecta and Hemiptera (Cicadellidae, Delphacidae and Others) per sample collected in maize crops in the center-south and the northeast regions of Brazil in the years 2005, 2006 and 2007.

t02_1470.gif

A total of 27 species of Cicadellidae were identified in the center-south states of Brazil (Goiás, Minas Gerais, São Paulo, Paraná, Santa Catarina, Rio Grande do Sul), and 18 of these species were found exclusively in these states. A total of 13 leafhopper species were identified in the northeast region (Maranhão and Piauí), with 3 species exclusively found in this area (Table 3). Eight species of Delphacidae were identified in the samples from the center-south region of Brazil, along with 8 more in the northeast region, with only 1 species exclusively found in each region (Table 4). The Jaccard similarity indexes estimated for the center-south region and northeast region were 0.30 for Cicadellidae, 0.78 for Delphacidae, and 0.41 for the 2 families together. These results indicate that there is a great difference in the Cicadellidae fauna among the 2 studied regions and a similar fauna of the Delphacidae family.

The 10 most abundant species in this study accounted for 97.6% of all Cicadellidae and Delphacidae collected, and these were: D. maidis (n = 3,994), Sogatella kolophon (Kirkaldy) (n = 74), Rotigonalia limbatula (Osborn) (n = 53), Planicephalus flavicosta (Stål) (n = 41), Tagosodes cubanus (Crawford) (n = 41), Pyrophagus tigrinus Remes Lenicov & Varela (n = 36), Balchutha incisa (Matsumura) (n = 32), Agallia albidula Uhler (n = 22), Delphacidae sp.1 (n = 21) and Atanus declivatus Linnavuori (n = 15).

Eight Cicadellidae and Delphacidae species found in this study were recorded as vectors of virus and or mollicutes in maize, i.e., the leafhoppers D. maidis, P. flavicosta, C. teapae and Extianus obscurinervis (Stål) and the planthoppers S. kolophon, P. tigrinus, Toya propinqua (Fieber) and P. maidis. Five species were reported for the first time in Brazil, i.e., the species A. declivatus and A. dubius (Cicadellidae) and S. kolophon, T. cubanus and P. tigrinus (Delphacidae).

Until now, only D. maidis and P. maidis were reported and widely known as vectors of mollicutes and/or viruses in maize crops in Brazil. The corn leafhopper (D. maidis) is the vector of S. kunkelli, maize bushy stunt phytoplasma and Maize rayado fino virus (Nault 1980, 1990). Dalbulus maidis represented 90.1% among all collected leafhoppers and planthoppers and was present in 64.1% (n = 127) of the samples. Furthermore, it was collected in all states, except in Piauí (Table 3).

Differences in abundance of D. maidis were observed depending of the year. A total of 89.8% of all D. maidis specimens collected in this study were obtained in 2006, being the state of Goiás responsible for 56.8% of this total. In the northeast region, the incidence of this leafhopper species was higher in 2005, when 92.3% of the total D. maidis specimens were collected. These results confirm previous studies that point this species as the most abundant Cicadellidae in maize, and the main vector of maize pathogens in Brazil (Oliveira et al. 2002a, 2004; Lopes & Oliveira 2004).

The corn planthopper, P. maidis, which has a pantropical distribution (Singh & Seetharama 2008), is the vector of Maize mosaic virus, present in Brazil (Lopes & Oliveira 2004) and Argentina (Remes Lenicov & Mariani 2001), and of Maize stripe virus, reported in Colombia (Varon de Agudelo & Martinez-Lopez 1980). This species also was capable of transmitting Mal de Río Cuarto virus to maize under experimental conditions (Virla et al. 2004; Giménez Pecci et al. 2012). This planthopper was found in the states of Maranhão (81.8% of the collected specimens), Minas Gerais and Rio Grande do Sul.

Table 3.

Average number of leafhoppers (Cicadellidae) Per sample collected by sweep net in maize crops in several states of Brazil in the years 2005, 2006 and 2007.

t03_1470.gif

Table 4.

Average number of planthoppers (Delphacidae) Per sample collected by sweep net in maize crops in several states of Brazil, in the years 2005, 2006 and 2007.

t04_1470.gif

The planthopper, P. tigrinus, was observed in the states of Maranhão, Piauí, Goiás, Minas Gerais and Paraná (Table 4). Under experimental conditions, this species was capable of transmitting Mal de Río Cuarto virus to maize (Velazquez et al. 2006). Another Delphacidae capable of transmitting this virus under experimental conditions is T. propinqua (Velazquez et al. 2001; Mattio et al. 2005), which was collected in Goiás and Maranhão (Table 4). Toya propinqua also is the vector of Cynodon chlorotic streak virus and, under experimental conditions, transmitted Maize rough dwarf virus to maize plants (Harpaz 1972). Only 2 specimens of the planthopper Caenodelphax teapae (Fowler), the insect vector of the Urochloa hoja blanca virus in grass [Urochloa plantaginea (Link) RD Webster] (Miranda et al. 2001) and of the Mal de Río Cuarto virus in maize, under experimental conditions (Giménez Pecci et al. 2012), were detected in the states of Goiás and Santa Catarina (Table 4).

Mal de Río Cuarto virus is a quarantine virus in Brazil (Giménez Pecci et al. 2012). This virus caused severe losses in maize production in Argentina (Lenardón et al. 1998; Ornaghi et al. 1999; Truol et al. 2001). Because the planthopper species, C. teapae, P. maidis, P. tigrinus and T. propinqua, are potential vectors of Mal de Río Cuarto virus and are present in Brazil, there is a serious risk of introduction of this virus.

The leafhopper, P. flavicosta, already recorded in several Brazilian states (Cavichioli & Zanol 1991), is abundant in weeds associated with cereal crops as wheat, oats and corn and is widely distributed in America (Linnavuori 1959; Kramer 1971). This species is the vector of phytoplasmas (Dabek 1982; Eckstein 2010) and Maize chlorotic dwarf waikavirus in maize (Lopes et al. 1994). This species was reported as one of the most abundant leafhoppers in the Atlantic forest in the state of Minas Gerais (Coelho 1997). In our study, P. flavicosta was observed in the states of Maranhão, Goiás and Rio Grande do Sul (Table 3). Studies about the natural infectivity of this leafhopper and transmission of phytoplasma to maize could be important to verify the variability of this mollicute and the potential of this leafhopper species as a disease vector in maize. The leafhopper, E. obscurinervis, collected in the states of Minas Gerais, Paraná, Santa Catarina and Rio Grande do Sul, was recently reported as an experimental vector of S. kunkelli in maize, in Argentina (Carloni et al. 2011).

The planthopper, S. kolophon, which has worldwide distribution (Asche & Wilson 1990), is the vector of the rhabdovirus of Pangola grass [Digitaria decumbens Stent & D. ciliaris (Retz.) Koeler] (Greber 1979). Also, experimentally, this species transmitted Maize sterile stunt to maize (Greber 1982). Sogatella kolophon was recorded in the states of Maranhão, Piauí, Goiás, Minas Gerais and Paraná. However, 78.4% of the specimens were collected in Maranhão and Piauí (Table 4) suggesting that this species is most common in the northeast region.

Agallia albidula, a leafhopper that is the vector of Tomato curly top virus (Coelho et al. 2001), and has been reported in several states of Brazil, was collected in the states of Goiás, Paraná, Santa Catarina and Rio Grande do Sul (Table 3). The species Empoasca curveola Oman, apparently widely distributed in Brazil (Table 3), has been reported as a phytoplasma vector to beet, in Chile (Salgado 2001).

The species Agalliana ensigera Oman and A. sticticolis (Stål) are very common on potato, cotton, wheat, tobacco, and beet, and are vectors of Curly top virus (Costa 1957; Silva et al. 1968). These species were only found in the center-south states of Brazil as well the species Macugonalia leucomelas (Walker) (Table 3). Macugonalia leucomelas is common in citrus and it is the vector of the bacterium Xylella fastidiosa (Almeida et al. 2005).

The Delphacidae T. cubanus is the vector of Hoja blanca virus in rice in America (King & Saunders 1984) and was recorded in the states of Maranhão and Goiás, with 65.8% of the specimens collected in Maranhão (Table 4).

We observed that Cicadellidae and Delphacidae diversity in Brazil is comparable to other countries in South America. Between 25 and 35 Cicadellidae species were reported in Argentina (Remes Lenicov 1982; Tesón et al. 1986; Paradell 1995; Paradell et al. 2001; Luft Albarracin et al. 2008) including: D. maidis, A. ensigera, Amplicephalus dubius (Linnavuori), Chlorotettix fraterculus (Berg), E. curveola, E. obscurinervis, Haldorus sexpunctatus (Berg), Hortensia similis (Walker), Copididonus hyalinipennis (Stål), P. flavicosta, B. incisa, Stirellus picinus (Berg) and Curtara pagina De Long and Freytag, that were also found in our study. Regarding the Delphacidae family, 11 species were reported in Argentina (Remes Lenicov & Virla 1999; Velazquez et al. 2006) and 4 species in Uruguay (Remes Lenicov et al. 2000). The species T. propinqua, S. kolophon, P. maidis and P. tigrinus reported in Argentina and Uruguay are also present in Brazil.

In the only other study of Cicadellidae species in maize crops conducted in Brazil (Lopes & Oliveira 2004), 6 species were identified, and 3 of them were coincident with the present results, i.e., D. maidis, E. obscurinervis and H. similis.

We speculate that the observed differences in abundance and species richness of the Delphacidae and, mainly, Cicadellidae families in Brazil may have implications for the incidence and severity of diseases that occur in maize and that are caused by phytopathogens transmitted by insects in the center-south and northeast states of the country. In Brazil, the diseases whose pathogens are transmitted by Cicadellidae are generally more frequent, more severe and are recorded mainly in the center-south states than those whose vectors are Delphacidae (Oliveira et al. 1998; Oliveira et al. 2002b). The almost complete lack of information about disease outbreaks in maize transmitted by insect vectors in northeastern Brazil may be the result not only of the lack of surveys in this region, but also the result of differences in abundance and species richness of Cicadellidae and Delphacidae fauna in relation to the center-south region states.

The results of our study also showed that several detected species are insect vectors of phytopathogens. It is possible that the majority of the leafhopper and planthopper species identified have weeds or others plant species as preferred hosts, but many could eventually feed on maize and infect it with phytopathogens. For this reason, it is important to know their epidemiological role in the dissemination of diseases in this crop. The presence of potential vectors of Mal de Río Cuarto virus points out the necessity to reinforce monitoring to avoid the introduction and spread of this quarantine virus in Brazilian commercial maize crops.

Although our study includes 4 regions, 8 states, and 48 locations in Brazil, the results presented here are preliminary, due to the large territory of Brazil, its numerous biogeographic regions, where corn is grown, and the fact that diversity and abundance of Cicadellidae and Delphacidae is influenced by the maize growth stage and the composition and abundance of weeds associated with crop. Future studies in other regions of the country are still needed for the deeper knowledge of the fauna of Cicadellidae and Delphacidae in maize in Brazil.

Conclusions

The species richness of Cicadellidae and Delphacidae species in maize crops in Brazil is similar to the species richness of these families in other countries of South America, specifically Argentina and Uruguay. Among the Cicadellidae and Delphacidae species that were collected in maize crops in Brazil, there are several species reported as insect vectors of phytopathogens, including viruses and mollicutes that can infect maize. In Brazil, 4 planthopper species, which are potential vectors of the quarantine Mal de Río Cuarto virus, were collected in maize crops.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Pioneer Seeds of Brazil for its contribution and support to this survey. They would also like to thank Dr. Alexei Dianese (Embrapa Cerrados) for his help during the preparation of this manuscript. We thank the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, Brazil); the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) and Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (CIC) of Argentina.

References Cited

1.

R. P. Almeida , M. J. Blua , J. R. Lopes , and A. H. Purcell 2005. Vector transmission of Xylella fastidiosa: applying fundamental knowledge to generate disease management strategies. Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 98: 775–786. Google Scholar

2.

M. Asche , and M. R. Wilson 1990. The delphacid genus Sogatella and related groups: a revision with special reference to rice-associated species (Fulgoroidea). Syst. Entomol. 15:1–42. Google Scholar

3.

E. Carloni , E. Virla , S. Paradell , P. Carpane , C. Nome , I. Laguna , and M. P. Gimenéz Pecci 2011. Extianus obscurinervis: (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) a new experimental vector of Spiroplasma kunkelli. J. Econ. Entomol. 104: 1793–1799. Google Scholar

4.

R. R. Cavichioli , and K. M. R. Zanol 1991. Espécies de Cicadellinae, Deltocephalinae (Homoptera, Cicadellidae) da Ilha de Maracá, Roraima. Acta Amazônica 21: 55–61. Google Scholar

5.

A. Chao 1984. Non-parametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scandinavian J. Statist. 11: 265–270. Google Scholar

6.

A. Chao 1987. Estimating the population size for capture- recapture data with unequal catchability. Biometrics 43: 783–791. Google Scholar

7.

M. M. Choudhury , and E. Rosenkranz 1983. Vector relationships of Graminella nigrifrons to maize chlorotic dwarf virus. Phytopathology 73:685–690. Google Scholar

8.

L. B. N. Coelho 1997. Análise faunística de Cicadellidae (Insecta: Homoptera) em área de mata atlântica. 73p. Dissertation. Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil. Google Scholar

9.

L. B. N. Coelho , E. R. Silva , and P. S. F. Ferreira 2001. Registros novos e adicionais de Agalliinae, Gyponinae e Nirvaniinae (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) para o Estado de Minas Gerais, Brasil. Entomotropica 16: 131–135. Google Scholar

10.

A. S. Costa 1957. Alguns insetos e ácaros usados na transmissão de moléstias de vírus das plantas. Bragantia 16: 15–21. Google Scholar

11.

A. J. Dabek 1982. Transmission experiments on coconut lethal yellowing disease with Deltocephalus flavicosta Stål, a leafhopper vector of periwinkle phyllody in Jamaica. J. Phytopathol. 103: 103–109. Google Scholar

12.

C. H. Dietrich 2005. Keys to the families of Cicadomorpha and subfamilies and tribes of Cicadellidae (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha). Florida Entomol. 88(4): 502–517. Google Scholar

13.

B. Eckstein 2010. Enfezamento do brócolis: identificação molecular de fitoplasmas, potenciais insetos vetores e hospedeiros alternativos, e análise epidemiológica da doença. 103p. Dissertation. Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz”, Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil. Google Scholar

14.

J. R. Edwardson , and R. G. Christie 1991. The potyvirus group. Volumes 1–4, Florida Agricultural Experiment Station, Monograph 16. Google Scholar

15.

M. P. Giménez Pecci , I. G. Laguna , and S. Lenardón 2012. Enfermedades del maiz producidas por virus y mollicutes en Argentina. INTA, Buenos Aires. 200 pp. Google Scholar

16.

R. E. Gingery , L. R. Nault , and O. E. Bradfute 1981. Maize stripe virus: characteristics of a member of a new virus class. Virology 112: 99–108. Google Scholar

17.

R. G. Greber 1979. Digitaria striate virus - a rhahdovirus of grasses transmitted by Sogatella kolophon (Kirk.). Australian J. Agr. Res. 30: 43–51. Google Scholar

18.

R. S. Greber 1982. Maize sterile stunt - a delphacid transmitted rhabdovirus disease affecting some maize genotypes in Australia. Australian J. Agr. Res. 33:13–23. Google Scholar

19.

I. Harpaz 1972. Maize Rough Dwarf. A planthopper virus disease affecting maize, rice, small grains and grasses. Israel Universities Press, Jerusalen. 251p. Google Scholar

20.

IBGE. 2011. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística.  http://teen.ibge.gov.br/noticias-teenGoogle Scholar

21.

P. Jaccard 1908. Nouvelles recherches sur la distribution florale. Bull. Soc. Vaudoise Sci. Nat. 44: 223–270. Google Scholar

22.

J. P. Kramer 1971. North American Deltocephalinae leafhoppers of the genus Planicephalus with new genus generic segregates from Deltocephalus (Homoptera:Cicadellidae). Proc. Entomol. Soc. Washington 73(3): 255–268. Google Scholar

23.

A. B. S. King , and J. L. Saunders 1984. The invertebrate pests of annual food crops in Central America. TDRI, London. 166p. Google Scholar

24.

S. L. Lenardón , G. J. March , S. F. Nome , and J. A. Ornaghi 1998. Recent outbreak of “Mal de Río Cuarto Virus” on corn in Argentina. Plant Dis. 82: 448. Google Scholar

25.

R. Linnavuori 1959. Revision of the neotropical Deltocephalinae and some subfamilies related. Ann. Zool. Soc. “Vanamo” 20: 1–370. Google Scholar

26.

J. R. S. Lopes , L. R. Nault , R. E. Gingery 1994. Leafhopper transmission and host plant range of Maize chlorotic dwarf waikavirus strains. Phytopathology 84: 876–882. Google Scholar

27.

J. R. S. Lopes , and C. M. Oliveira 2004. Vetores de vírus e molicutes em milho, pp. 35–60 In E. Oliveira and C. M. Oliveira [eds.], Doenças em milho: molicutes, vírus, vetores e mancha por Phaeosphaeria. Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, Brasília. 276p. Google Scholar

28.

E. L. Luft Albarracin , S. Paradell , and E. G. Virla 2008. Cicadellidae (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha) associated with maize crops in northwestern Argentina, influence of the sowing date and phenology of their abundance and diversity. Maydica 53: 289–296. Google Scholar

29.

N. S. Massola Júnior , I. P. Bedendo , L. Amorim , and J. R. S. Lopes 1999. Quantificação de danos causados pelo enfezamento vermelho e enfezamento pálido do milho em condições de campo. Fitopatol. Brasileira 24: 136–142. Google Scholar

30.

M. F. Mattio , P. D. Velazquez , G. A. Truol , A. Cassol , V. Alemandri , and M. B. Sagadín 2005. Toya propinqua Fieber como vector natural de Mal de Río Cuarto virus (MRCV). Hoja Informativa 4. INTA-IFFIVE, Ciudad de Córdoba, Argentina. Google Scholar

31.

J. Miranda , M. Muñoz , R. Wu , and A. M. Espinoza 2001. Phylogenetic placement of a novel tenuivirus from the grass Urochloa plantaginea. Virus Genes 22: 329–333. Google Scholar

32.

L. R. Nault 1980. Maize bushy stunt and corn stunt: a comparison of disease symptoms, pathogen host ranges, and vectors. Phytopathology 70: 659–662. Google Scholar

33.

L. R. Nault 1989. Leafhopper and planthopper transmission of plant viruses. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 34: 503–529. Google Scholar

34.

L. R. Nault 1990. Evolution of insect pest: maize and leafhopper, a case study. Maydica 35: 165–175. Google Scholar

35.

M. W. Nielson 1985. Leafhopper systematic, pp. 11–40 In L. R. Nault and V. G. Rodriguez [eds.], The Leafhoppers and Plantahoppers. John Wiley, New York. 500 p. Google Scholar

36.

L. B. O'Brien , and S. W. Wilson 1985. Plantahoppers systematics and external morphology, pp. 61–102 In L. R. Nault and V. G. Rodriguez [eds.], The Leafhoppers and Plantahoppers. John Wiley, New York. 500 p. Google Scholar

37.

C. M. Oliveira , J. R. S. Lopes , C. T. S. Dias , and L. R. Nault 2004. Influence of latitude and elevation on polymorphism among populations of the corn leafhopper, Dalbulus maidis (DeLong & Wolcott) (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae), in Brazil. Environ. Entomol. 33: 1192–1199. Google Scholar

38.

C. M. Oliveira , R. M. S. Molina , R. S. Albres , and J. R. S. Lopes 2002a. Disseminação de molicutes do milho a longas distâncias por Dalbulus maidis (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae). Fitopatol. Brasileira, 27: 91–95. Google Scholar

39.

E. Oliveira , R. V. Carvalho , A. P. Duarte , R. A. Andrade , R. O. Resende , C. M. Oliveira , and P. C. Recco 2002b. Molicutes e vírus em milho na safrinha e na safra de verão. Rev. Brasileira Milho Sorgo 1: 38–46. Google Scholar

40.

E. Oliveira , R. O. Resende , M. L. P. Giménez Pecci , I. G. Laguna , P. Herrera , and I. Cruz 2003. Ocorrência e perdas causadas por molicutes e vírus na cultura do milho safrinha no Paraná. Pesq. Agropec. Brasileira 38: 19–25. Google Scholar

41.

E. Oliveira , J. M. Waquil , F. T. Fernandes , E. Paiva , R. O. Resende and W. E. Kitajima 1998. Enfezamento pálido e enfezamento vermelho na cultura do milho no Brasil Central. Fitopatol. Brasileira 23: 45–47. Google Scholar

42.

J. A. Ornaghi , G. J. March , G. T. Boito , A. Marinelli , J. E. Beviacqua , J. Giuggia , and S. L. Lenardon 1999. Infectivity in natural populations of Delphacodes kuscheli vector of “Mal de Rio Cuarto” virus. Maydica 44: 219–223. Google Scholar

43.

M. W. Palmer 1991. Estimating species richness: the second-order jackknife reconsidered. Ecology 72: 1512–1513. Google Scholar

44.

S. L. Paradell 1995. Especies argentinas de Homópteros Cicadélidos asociados al cultivo de maíz (Zea mays L.). Rev. Fac. Agron. (La Plata), 71: 213–234. Google Scholar

45.

S. L. Paradell , E. G. Virla , and A. Toledo 2001. Leafhoppers species richness and abundance on corn crops in Argentina (Insecta-Hemiptera-Cicadellidae). Bol. San. Veg. Plagas 27: 465–474. Google Scholar

46.

M. G. Redinbaugh , D. L. Seifers , T. Meulia , J. J. Abt , R. J. Anderson , W. E. Styer , J. Ackerman , R. Salomon , W. Houghton , R. Creamer , D. T. Gordon , and S. A. Hogenhout 2002. Maize fine streak virus, a new leafhopper-transmitted rhabdovirus. Phytopathology 92:1167–1174. Google Scholar

47.

A. M. M. Remes Lenicov 1982. Aportes al conocimiento de los Agallinae argentinos (Homoptera-Cicadellidae). Neotrópica 28: 125–138. Google Scholar

48.

A. M. M. Remes Lenicov , and R. Mariani 2001. Hallazgo del vector del “virus del mosaico del maíz”, Peregrinus maidis (Homoptera: Delphacidae) en la provincia de Buenos Aires. Neotrópica 47: 48. Google Scholar

49.

A. M. M. Remes Lenicov , and E. G. Virla 1999. Delfacidos asociados al cultivo de maiz en la Republica Argentina (Insecta-Homoptera-Delphacidae). Rev. Fac. Agron. (La Plata) 104: 1–15. Google Scholar

50.

A. M. M. Remes Lenicov , I. G. Laguna P. Rodriguez Pardina , R. Mariani , E. Virla , P. Herrera , and E. Dagoberto 1999. Diagnóstico del virus del “Mal de Río Cuarto” y sus vectores en maíz, en Argentina. Manejo Integrado de Plagas 51: 36–46. Google Scholar

51.

A. M. M. Remes Lenicov , A. Tesón , E. Dagoberto , and N. Huguet 1985. Hallazgo de uno de los vectores del “Mal de Río Cuarto” del maíz . Gac. Agron. 5: 251–258. Google Scholar

52.

A. M. M. Remes Lenicov , S. Zerbino , and M. Demaría 2000. Especies de delfácidos (Homoptera, Delphacidae) presentes en el cultivo de maíz, en Uruguay. Agrociencia (Montevideo) 4: 93–95. Google Scholar

53.

C. R. Salgado 2001. Deteccion del fitoplasma causante de la marchitez amarilla de la remolacha (Beta vulgaris L. var. saccharifera), en cicadelidos (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) por PCR. 23p. Dissertation. Facultad de Agronomia, Universidad de Concepcion, Chillán, Chile. Google Scholar

54.

M. C. Shurtleff 1992. Compendium of corn diseases. 2 ed. APS Press, St. Paul. 105 p. Google Scholar

55.

A. G. A. Silva , C. R. Gonçalves , D. M. Galvão , A. J. L. Gonçalves , J. Gomes , M. N. Silva , and L. Simoni 1968. Quarto catálogo dos insetos que vivem nas plantas do Brasil seus parasitos e predadores. Parte II - 1° Tomo. Ministério da Agricultura, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 622p. Google Scholar

56.

B. U. Singh , N. Seetharama 2008. Host plant interactions of the corn planthopper, Peregrinus maidis Ashm. (Homoptera: Delphacidae) in maize and sorghum agroecosystems. Arthropod-Plant Interact. 2: 163–196. Google Scholar

57.

A. Tesón , A. M. M. Remes Lenicov , E. Dagoberto , and S. Paradell 1986. Fluctuaciones poblacionales de los cicadélidos que viven sobre maíz y maleza circundante en la zona de Sampacho, Córdoba, Ar Argentina (Insecta-Homoptera-Delphacidae). Rev. Fac. Agron. (La Plata) 104: 1–15. Google Scholar

58.

A. M. M. Remes Lenicov , I. G. Laguna P. Rodriguez Pardina , R. Mariani , E. Virla , P. Herrera , and E. Dagoberto 1999. Diagnóstico del virus del “Mal de Río Cuarto” y sus vectores en maíz, en Argentina. Manejo Integrado de Plagas 51: 36–46. Google Scholar

59.

A. M. M. Remes Lenicov , A. Tesón , E. Dagoberto , and N. Huguet 1985. Hallazgo de uno de los vectores del “Mal de Río Cuarto” del maíz . Gac. Agron. 5: 251–258. Google Scholar

60.

A. M. M. Remes Lenicov , S. Zerbino , and M. Demaría 2000. Especies de delfácidos (Homoptera, Delphacidae) presentes en el cultivo de maíz, en Uruguay. Agrociencia (Montevideo) 4: 93–95. Google Scholar

61.

C. R. Salgado 2001. Deteccion del fitoplasma causante de la marchitez amarilla de la remolacha (Beta vulgaris L. var. saccharifera), en cicadelidos (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) por PCR. 23p. Dissertation. Facultad de Agronomia, Universidad de Concepcion, Chillán, Chile. Google Scholar

62.

M. C. Shurtleff 1992. Compendium of corn diseases. 2 ed. APS Press, St. Paul. 105 p. Google Scholar

63.

A. G. A. Silva , C. R. Gonçalves , D. M. GalvÃO , A. J. L. Gonçalves , J. Gomes , M. N. Silva , and L. Simoni 1968. Quarto catálogo dos insetos que vivem nas plantas do Brasil seus parasitos e predadores. Parte II - 1° Tomo. Ministério da Agricultura, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 622p Google Scholar

64.

B. U. Singh , N. Seetharama 2008. Host plant interactions of the corn planthopper, Peregrinus maidis Ashm. (Homoptera: Delphacidae) in maize and sorghum agroecosystems. Arthropod-Plant Interact. 2: 163–196. Google Scholar

65.

A. Tesón , A. M. M. Remes Lenicov , E. Dagoberto , and S. Paradell 1986. Fluctuaciones poblacionales de los cicadélidos que viven sobre maíz y maleza circundante en la zona de Sampacho, Córdoba, Argentina (Homoptera-Cicadellidae). Rev. Soc. Entomol. Argentina 44: 77–84. Google Scholar

66.

G. Thottappilly , N. A. Bosque-Perez , and H. W. Rossel 1993. Viruses and virus diseases of maize Tropical Africa. Plant Pathol. 42: 494–509. Google Scholar

67.

G. A. Truol , T. Usugi , J. D. Hirao , M. P. Giménez Pecci , and I. G. Laguna 2001. Transmissión experimental del virus del mal de Río Cuarto por Delphacodes kuskeli. Fitopatol. Brasileira, 26: 39–41. Google Scholar

68.

F. Varon De Agudelo , and G. Martinez-Lopez 1980. Observaciones preliminares sobre la transmisión de virus con Peregrinus maidis. Rev. Colombiana Entomol. 6: 69–73. 29. Google Scholar

69.

P. D. Velazquez , L. R. Conci , and G. A. Truol 2001. Toya propinqua (Hemiptera: Delphacidae): especie vectora del virus del mal de Río Cuarto (MRCV) en transmisiones experimentales. Fitopatol. Brasileira 26: 542. Google Scholar

70.

P. D. Velazquez , F. A. Guzman , L. R. Conci , A. M. M. Remes Lenicov , and G. A. Truol 2006. Pyrophagus tigrinus Remes Lenicov & Varela (Hemiptera: Delphacidae), a new vector of the Mal de Rio Cuarto virus (MRCV, Fijivirus) under experimental conditions. Agriscientia 23: 9–14. Google Scholar

71.

E. Virla , I. Miotti , M. P. Giménez Pecci , P. Carpane , and G. Laguna 2004. Peregrinus maidis (Hem.: Delphacidae), new experimental vector of the “Mal de Rio Cuarto” disease to corn. Biocell. 28: 54. Google Scholar

72.

J. M. Waquil , E. Oliveira , N. F. J. A. Pinto , F. T. Fernandes , and L. A. Correa 1996. Efeito na produção e incidência de viroses em híbridos comerciais de milho. Fitopatol. Brasileira 21: 460–463. Google Scholar

73.

D. Young 1977. Taxonomic study of the Cicadellinae (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). Part 2. New world Cicadellini and the Genus Cicadella. North Carolina Agric. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 239: 1–1135. Google Scholar
Charles Martins De Oliveira, Elizabeth De Oliveira, Isabel Regina Prazeres De Souza, Elcio Alves, William Dolezal, Susana Paradell, Ana Maria Marino De Remes Lenicov, and Marina Regina Frizzas "Abundance and Species Richness of Leafhoppers and Planthoppers (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae and Delphacidae) in Brazilian Maize Crops," Florida Entomologist 96(4), 1470-1481, (1 December 2013). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.096.0427
Published: 1 December 2013
KEYWORDS
fitoplasma
insect vectors
insetos vetores
maize viruses
mollicutes
phytoplasma
Spiroplasma
Back to Top