Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 June 2014 The Attractiveness of Manuka Oil and Ethanol, Alone and in Combination, to Xyleborus glabratus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) and Other Curculionidae
C. W. Johnson, R. S. Cameron, J. L. Hanula, C. Bates
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The addition of a trap baited with manuka oil or longer lasting cubeb oil lures (Hanula et al. 2013) along with those baited with ethanol for surveys targeting detection of non-native, invasive Curculionidae could improve these surveys by also targeting the destructive redbay ambrosia beetle.

The increasing volume of international commerce in the last century has resulted in an exchange of organisms at an alarming rate. Among those exhibiting a significant threat to forests are the bark and ambrosia beetles and their associated fungi. Between 1985 and 2005, 18 scolytinae species introductions to the U.S. were recorded, and others have been documented since (Haack 2006; Rabaglia et al. 2010). The redbay ambrosia beetle, Xyleborus glabratus Eichhoff (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) and the associated laurel wilt fungus (Raffaela lauricola Harrington, Fraedrich & Aghayeva) (Harrington et al. 2008), is one such insect-fungus species complex. First detected in Port Wentworth, Georgia in 2002, the beetle and pathogen have since spread to North and South Carolina, Alabama, Mississippi, and Florida (Bates et al. 2013).

Female beetles carry the symbiotic fungus in mandibular mycangia and inoculate hosts upon attack during gallery formation, ultimately resulting in death of the host (Fraedrich et al. 2008). Beetles readily attack and transmit the lethal laurel wilt fungus to healthy redbay [Persea borbonia (L.) Spreng; Laurales: Lauraceae] and swamp bay [Persea palustris (Raf.) Sarg.], and to a lesser degree, other members of the family Lauraceae, including sassafras [Sassafras albidum (Nutt.) Nees] and avocado (Persea americana Mill.) (Fraedrich et al. 2008; Hanula et al. 2008; Kendra et al. 2011a). Confirmed cases of the disease have been reported in Florida's commercial avocado (Persea americana Mill.) plantations, and there is considerable concern over the risk posed to the $ 23.5 million/year avocado industry (USDA Economic Research Service 2013). Early detection of this destructive pest is an integral part of managing populations.

Xyleborus glabratus is not known to possess a long range sex pheromone and this aspect of its biology limits trapping efforts to using host volatiles. Unlike other Xyleborini, it is not attracted to ethanol [Hanula et al. 2008, 2011; Kendra et al. 2014]. It is, however, attracted to manuka oil (from Leptospermum scoparium Forst. & Forst. [Myrtaceae]), phoebe oil (from Phoebe porosa Mex. [Lauraceae]), and cubeb oil (from Piper cubeba L. [Piperaceae]) species which possess sesquiterpenes also present in Lauraceae species in the U.S. (Hanula & Sullivan 2008; Hanula et al. 2013; Kendra et al. 2011a, b). Unfortunately, because most Xyleborini are attracted to ethanol, national pest survey programs use ethanol and do not incorporate any of these extracts (Miller & Rabaglia 2009). The objectives of this study were to determine if the addition of manuka oil to ethanol would inhibit the responses of Xyleborini and other Curculionidae with known attraction to ethanol, and whether or not the combination of these attractants would alter the attractiveness of manuka oil to the redbay ambrosia beetle.

Sets of 3 Lindgren 8-unit funnel traps baited with ultra-high release ethanol lures (prod. no. 6160, Synergy Semiochemicals Corp., Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada), manuka oil (whole lure, Synergy Semiochemicals Corp. prod. no. P-385), or ethanol + manuka oil were deployed in random order along a straight line ca. 15 m apart from 15 May-18 Jun 2011 at each of 6 widely dispersed laurel wilt (LW) monitoring plots in SE Georgia (Cameron et al. 2012). Trapping sites were selected to represent varying stages of LW disease development and ambrosia beetle population levels. Curculionidae collected were identified to genus and species where possible.

The data were analyzed as a complete randomized block design ANOVA using SAS ver. 9.1 (SAS Institute 2002–2003). The dependent variables were total Curculionidae (individuals) and total curculionid species collected among treatments. The analysis of total beetles collected among treatments required the data be logtransformed to meet the assumptions of ANOVA. Post-hoc means were compared using the RyanEinot-Gabriel-Welsch test (Day & Quinn 1989).

Nineteen Scolytinae species and one Cossoninae species [Stenoscelis brevis (Boheman)] were collected and identified (and a number of unidentified specimens within the genus Hypothenemus) over the course of the experiment (Table 1). Analyses of total species and total beetles indicated a significant treatment effect [(F= 14.96; df = 2, 10; P = 0.0010); (F = 13.22; df = 2, 10; P = 0.0016), respectively]. Significantly more species and beetles were collected in traps baited with either ethanol alone or ethanol plus manuka oil than in those with manuka oil alone (Table 2). Collection of total species and individuals in traps baited with ethanol alone did not significantly differ from those baited with both manuka oil and ethanol (Table 2).

Table 1.

Total curculionidae captured in traps baited with ethanol, Manuka oil or both attractants from 15 May-18 Jun 2011 in Georgia.

t01_861.gif

The purpose of this study was to determine if manuka oil affected trap captures of beetles responding to ethanol and vice versa. With that in mind, this study shows that ethanol is relatively attractive to many Scolytinae when compared to manuka oil and the combination of the two did not reduce the number of species or total beetles captured but, as found by others, ethanol is not attractive to X. glabratus (Hanula & Sullivan 2008; Hanula et al. 2008, 2011; Kendra et al. 2014). Ethanol also appeared less attractive to the Cossoninae species S. brevis, which is unexpected given that others report finding this little understood species and a sister species, S. andersoni Buchanan, in dead or dying woody species (Anderson 1952; Ulyshen & Hanula 2009). Such hosts would typically release ethanol and presumably attract species found in these circumstances (Klimetzek et al. 1986; Montgomery & Wargo 1983). As reported by Kendra et al. (2014), we did not find a large difference in total Scolytinae (excluding X. glabratus) collected between the ethanol and ethanol + manuka oil treatments (286 and 254 beetles, respectively). While our collections of individual species were too low to test any inhibitory effects of manuka oil on attracting specific species, we observed that different species comprised the total when using ethanol alone or both the ethanol + manuka oil attractants, suggesting the possibility cannot be ruled out. Further replication and attention to site characteristics which would affect local Scolytinae population abundance and diversity would be required to test this hypothesis.

Table 2.

Mean number of curculionidae species and total number of beetles captured in traps baited with ethanol, Manuka oil or both attractants from 15 May-18 Jun 2011 IN Georgia.

t02_861.gif

References Cited

1.

W. H. Anderson 1952. Larvae of some genera of cossoninae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 45: 281–309. Google Scholar

2.

C. Bates , L. Reid , R. Tricked , J. Eickwort , J. J. Riggins , And D. Stone 2013. Distribution of counties with laurel wilt disease by year of initial detection. USD A Forest Service, Forest Health Protection, Region-8. ( http://www.fs.fed.us/r8/foresthealth/laurelwilt/dist_map. shtmlGoogle Scholar

3.

R. S. Cameron , C. Bates , and J. Johnson 2012. Chapter 11. Progression of Laurel Wilt Disease in Georgia: 2009–2011 (Project SC-EM-08-02). In Draft FHM 2012 National Technical Report,  http://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/fhm/pubs/misc/draft_FHM_2012_National_Technical_Report_FHM_Web.pdf  Google Scholar

4.

R. W. Day , and G. P. Quinn 1989. Comparison of treatments after an analysis of variance in ecology. Ecol. Monogr. 59: 433–463. Google Scholar

5.

S. W. Fraedrich , T. C. Harrington , R. J. Rabaglia , M. D. Ulyshen , A. E. Mayfield III , J. L. Hanula , J. M. Eickwort , and D. R. Miller 2008. A fungal symbiont of the redbay ambrosia beetle causes a lethal wilt in redbay and other Lauraceae in the southeastern United States. Plant Dis. 92: 215–224. Google Scholar

6.

R. A. Haack 2006. Exotic bark- and wood-boring Coleóptera in the United States: recent establishments and interceptions. Canadian J. For. Res. 36: 269–288. Google Scholar

7.

J. L. Hanula , and B. Sullivan 2008. Manuka oil and phoebe oil are attractive baits for Xyleborus glabratus (Coleoptera: Scolytinae), the vector of laurel wilt. Environ. Entomol. 37 (6): 1403–1409. Google Scholar

8.

J. L. Hanula , A. E. Mayfield III , S. W. Fraedrich , and R. J. Rabaglia 2008. Biology and host associations of redbay ambrosia beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae), exotic vector of laurel wilt killing redbay trees in the southeastern United States. J. Econ. Entomol. 101(4): 1276–1286. Google Scholar

9.

J. L. Hanula , M. D. Ulyshen , and S. Horn 2011. Effect of trap type, trap position, time of year, and beetle density on captures of the redbay ambrosia beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). J. Econ. Entomol. 104(2): 501–508. Google Scholar

10.

J. L. Hanula , B. T. Sullivan , and D. Wakarchuk 2013. Variation in manuka oil lure efficacy for capturing Xyleborus glabratus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae), and cubeb oil as an alternative attractant. Environ. Entomol. 42: 333–340. Google Scholar

11.

T. C. Harrington , S. W. Fraedrich , and D. N. Aghayeva 2008. Raffaelea lauricola, a new ambrosia beetle symbiont and pathogen on the Lauraceae. Mycotaxon. 104: 399-404. Google Scholar

12.

P. L. Kendra , W. S. Montgomery , J. Niogret , J. E. Peña , J. L. Capinera , G. Brar , N. D. Epsky , R. R. And Heath 2011a. Attraction of the redbay ambrosia beetle, Xyleborus glabratus, to avocado, lychee, and essential oil lures. J. Chem. Ecol. 37: 932–942. Google Scholar

13.

P. L. Kendra , J. S. Sanchez , W. S. Montgomery , K. E. Okins , J. Niogret , J. E. Peña , N. D. Epsky , and R. R. Heath 2011b. Diversity of Scolytinae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) attracted to avocado, lychee, and essential oil lures. Florida Entomol. 94: 123–130. Google Scholar

14.

P. L. Kendra , J. Niogret , W. S. Montgomery , E. Q. Schnell , M. A. Deyrup , and N. D. Epsky 2014. Evaluation of seven essential oils identifies cubeb oil as most effective attractant for detection of Xyleborus glabratus. J. Pest Sci. DOI: 10.1007/ sl0340-014-0561-y (published online 30 Jan 2014) Google Scholar

15.

D. Klimetzek , J. Köhler , J. P. Vité , and U. Kohnle 1986. Dosage response to ethanol mediates host selection by “secondary” bark beetles. Naturwissenschaften 73: 270–272. Google Scholar

16.

D. R. Miller , and R. J. Rabaglia 2009. Ethanol and (-)-α-pinene: attractant kairomones for bark and ambrosia beetles in the southeastern U. S.J. Chem. Ecol. 35: 435–448. Google Scholar

17.

M. E. Montgomery , and P. M. Wargo 1983. Ethanol and other host-derived volatiles as attractants to beetles that bore into hardwood. J. Chem. Ecol. 9: 181–190. Google Scholar

18.

R. J. Rabaglia , M. Knížek , and C. W. Johnson 2010. First records of Xyleborinus octies dentatus (Murayama) (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Scolytinae) from North America. Zookeys.(56): 219–226. Google Scholar

19.

SAS Institute. 2002–2003. SAS Institute Inc. Version 9.1, Cary, North Carolina, 27513, USA. Google Scholar

20.

M. D. Ulyshen , and J. L. Hanula 2009. Habitat associations of saproxylic beetles in the southeastern United States: A comparison of forest types, tree species, and wood postures. For. Ecol. and Man. 257: 653–664. Google Scholar

21.

Usda Economic Research Service. 2013. Fruit and tree nut yearbook,  http://usda01.library.cornell.edu/usda/ers/89022/FTS2013.pdf. Table B9. Google Scholar
C. W. Johnson, R. S. Cameron, J. L. Hanula, and C. Bates "The Attractiveness of Manuka Oil and Ethanol, Alone and in Combination, to Xyleborus glabratus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) and Other Curculionidae," Florida Entomologist 97(2), 861-864, (1 June 2014). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.097.0281
Published: 1 June 2014
KEYWORDS
atrayente
attractant
detección
detection
especies invasoras 017
invasive species
laurel wilt
Back to Top