Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2014 Interactions between Ghost Ants and Invasive Mealybugs: The Case of Tapinoma melanocephalum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and Phenacoccus solenopsis (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae)
A. M. Zhou, G. W. Liang, L. Zeng, Y. Y. Lu, Y. J. Xu
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Mutualism between ants and honeydew-producing hemipterans is a common phenomenon in ecosystems, and interactions between ants and hemipterans have been extensively studied. The invasive solenopsis mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), and the ghost ant, Tapinoma melanocephalum (F.) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), are widely distributed in China. Previous studies showed that the ghost ant can promote the fitness of the invasive mealybug when natural enemies of the mealybug are excluded. In this study, we investigated the interactions between the ghost ant and the invasive solenopsis mealybug when the mealybug's natural enemies were included. Our results indicated that the honeydew produced by mealybugs facilitated colony growth of the ghost ant significantly more than by allowing them to feed on the mealworm, Tenebrio molitor L. (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Tending by the ghost ant increased mealybug survival on the plants when six-spotted zigzag lady beetle larvae, Cheilomenes sexmaculata (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), were present. Both lady beetle adults and the mealybug parasitoid, Aenasius bambawalei Hayat (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), showed strong avoidance responses to ghost ants. The fecundity of lady beetle adults and the hatching rate of their eggs were significantly reduced by ghost ants. Also ghost ant tending appeared to negatively affect parasitoid performance. The number of mummified mealybugs on Hibiscus rosa-sinensis L. (Malvales: Malvaceae) in the presence of ghost ants was significantly less than the number without ants.

Interactions between ants and hemipterans are common and ecologically important (Hölldobler 1990; Stadler & Dixon 2005; Styrsky & Eubanks 2007). Ants and hemipterans are often abundant species that often live in the same habitats (Stadler & Dixon 2005); and interactions commonly occur between them (Helms & Vinson 2002; Brightwell & Silverman 2010). Ant-tending can promote hemipteran colonies because ant species protect them from their natural enemies (Daane et al. 2007; Powell & Silverman 2010). In exchange for tending the hemipterans, the ants receive large amounts of honeydew in a consumer-resource mutualism (Holland et al. 2005). Hemipteran honeydew contains sugar and various amino acids (Yao & Akimoto 2002; Helms & Vinson 2008) that can be essential for the ant colony's growth and survival.

The ghost ant, Tapinoma melanocephalum, (F.) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) is a worldwide invasive species, whose native range is unknown but is believed to be Africa or Asia (Wheeler 1910). Ghost ant populations and infestations are reported in many areas of the United States, as well as in Canada, Puerto Rico, and the Caribbean Islands (Smith & Whitman 1992). Tapinoma melanocephalum forms polygynous colonies that contain huge numbers of workers. Ghost ants show a preference for sweets, sugar, cakes, and syrups. Ghost ant workers frequently tend honeydew-producing insects and scavenge for dead insects in fields (Smith 1965). The ghost ant is highly adaptable in its nesting habits and has been present in China for a long time.

The mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis, Tinsley (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) is native to the US (Fuchs et al. 1991) and has spread throughout the world including Central America, South America, and Africa. It caused serious damage to cotton (Gossypium spp.; Malvales: Malvaceae) in India and Pakistan in 2005 (Nagrare et al. 2009). Currently, it is an important invasive species in south China (Lu et al. 2008), where it is frequently found on Hibiscus rosa-sinensis L. (Malvales: Malvaceae) and cotton.

Zhou et al. (2012a) showed that tending by Solenopsis invicta Buren (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), had positive impacts on the fitness of P. solenopsis mealybug colonies under laboratory conditions when enemies are absent. However, few studies have attempted to determine whether the T. melanocephalum ghost ant also have positive impacts when enemies are present. Previous studies showed that the invasive fire ant, S. invicta established a close relationship with P. solenopsis in south China (Zhou et al. 2012a). Fire ants frequently protect mealybugs from their natural enemies, and honeydew produced by P. solenopsis also facilitates the survival of fire ant colonies (Zhou et al. 2013). Mutualism between these 2 alien species may facilitate the invasion success of both (Zhou et al. 2012a; Zhou et al. 2012b; Zhou et al. 2013). In China, the distribution of T. melanocephalum is more extensive than that of fire ants, and interactions between T. melanocephalum and mealybugs may produce more profound ecological consequences. However, few studies have investigated the effects of tending by T. melanocephalum on P. solenopsis and its natural enemies. Also, we wanted to clarify clear how the T. melanocephalum ghost ant benefits from the honeydew produced by P. solenopsis. In this study, we conducted a series of experiments to examine the effects of P. solenopsis honeydew on the growth of T. melanocephalum colonies and the effects of T. melanocephalum -tending on the survival of the mealybugs and their natural enemies.

Materials and Methods

Cotton Plants

Cotton plants (Gossypium spp.; Malvales: Malvaceae were cultivated in greenhouses in plastic flowerpots (18 cm diam × 17 cm height). Each plant was approximately 25–30 cm in height and had 15–20 true leaves.

Insects

Colonies of P. solenopsis were collected from a suburb of Guangzhou and fed on cotton. First instar mealybugs were inoculated on cotton and the colony was raised for several generations. Cotton plants with established mealybug colonies were used for subsequent experiments. Mealybug colonies were reared in the laboratory at 27 ± 2 °C and 60–70% RH and 16:8 h L:D. Twenty colonies of T. melanocephalum ghost ants were collected from the campus of South China Agricultural University. Colonies were separated from the soil by dripping water into plastic boxes containing soil and ants until the ants floated to the surface (Jouvenaz et al. 1977). One T. melanocephalum sub-colony (approximately 1.0 g fresh weight of ants) from each colony was weighed out by a microbalance (Sartorius, BS, 224S). Each sub-colony included one queen, adult workers, pupae, larvae, and eggs. Each sub-colony was placed in a 9-cm plastic Petri dish, which served as an artificial nest. T. melanocephalum sub-colonies were maintained with distilled water plus a 10% honey solution, which was distributed through tubes (1.5 cm diam × 12 cm length) plugged with cotton.

The natural enemies of mealybugs, including the predatory larvae of the six-spotted zigzag lady beetle Cheilomenes sexmaculata (F.), (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), and the parasitoid, Aenasius bambawalei Hayat (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), were collected from H. rosa-sinensis in the field. The lady beetles were fed mealybug nymphs in the laboratory at 27 °C ± 1 °C and 16:8 h L:D. Aenasius bambawalei were collected as mummified mealybug and isolated in gelatin capsules (10 mm in length) until adult emergence. After emergence, pairs of wasps were established in petri dishes and copulation was observed in all pairings. Female wasps were used in experiments 24 h after mating (Zhou et al. 2013b).

Experiment 1: Food supply and T. melanocephalum Colony Growth

We prepared 100 Fluon-coated plastic boxes (36 × 20 × 15 cm) and filled them with soil and transferred potted cotton seedlings into the plastic boxes. A sub-colony of T. melanocephalum was then placed into each plastic box, and within 24 h, the ants had left the Petri dish and had constructed a new nest in the soil. The Fluon coating of the inner surfaces of each plastic box prevented the ants from escaping. Our experiments included the following treatments: (1) no food (water supply only); (2) mealworms (Tenebrio molitor L.; Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae), 2 g every 2 days; (3) 15 mL of honey solutions every 2 days; (4) low-density mealybugs (60); and (5) high-density mealybugs (400). Mealybugs were transferred to the potted cotton plants as first instars. A test tube (10 × 1.5 cm) filled with distilled water and sealed with a cotton plug was used as a constant source of water. To prevent drying, the soil in each small plastic case was sprayed with water every 3 days. Each treatment was replicated 15 times and after 10 weeks, all surviving ants were extracted, counted, and weighed on a microbalance (Sartorius, BS, 224S).

Experiment 2: Ant Tending and Predation on P. Solenopsis

Cotton plants with 15–20 true leaves (30–40 cm tall), were each planted in a plastic boxes filled with soil. Each plastic box was covered with nylon netting surrounded by a cage (70 × 70 × 100 cm). A sub-colony of T. melanocephalum (1 g, 1,000 workers and 1 queen per nest) was placed in each plastic box, and each sub-colony constructed a new nest in the soil as described above. The ants were given 50 mL of water every 2 days. The experiment consisted of 2 treatments: (1) mealybugs with ants and lady beetles, and (2) mealybugs with lady beetles but without ants. Each treatment was replicated 15 times. One hundred mealybugs were transferred to each cotton plants and the lady beetle larvae were placed on each plant 24 h later. Surviving mealybugs were counted at 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h.

Experiment 3: Cheilomenes sexmaculata Ant Avoidance Behavior

Cheilomenes sexmaculata adult females were given a choice to lay eggs in 1 of 2 adjacent areas in each plastic box (36 × 20 × 25 cm), i.e., an area occupied by T. melanocephalum ghost ants, and an area with ghost ants excluded. The plastic boxes were cleaned with alcohol and distilled water to eliminate any residual semiochemicals. Two plastic boxes were placed next to each other, each with an open window in the upper half of the adjoining wall. To prevent ants from crossing from one area into another, Fluon was applied halfway up the inside of each box below the window. However, lady beetles could still access both areas by climbing across or flying across the open window. A 14-cm Petri dish coated with Fluon was placed in the center of each box, and a cotton leaf with 150 second instar mealybugs was placed in the dish. The petiole of a cotton leaf was wrapped with moist cotton to maintain turgor. At the beginning of the experiment, 100 ghost ant workers were placed into each box (n = 15) along with 10 C. sexmaculata adults. Fluon was used to prevent mealybugs from escaping and ghost ants from invading. We counted the number of eggs laid in the Petri dishes and the number of ladybeetles in each area at 4-h intervals during a 24 h period.

Experiment 4: Ghost Ants and Cheilomenes sexmaculata Egg Viability

Cheilomenes sexmaculata lady beetles were raised on mealybug nymphs in climate-controlled growth chambers under the same physical conditions as described above (at 27 ± 2 °C and 60-70% RH). Newly laid (approximately 8 h old) C. sexmaculata egg clusters of 30-60 eggs were collected and placed in each 10-cm Petri dish in a Fluon coated plastic box (n = 15). This experiment included 2 treatments: (1) 100 ghost ant workers, and (2) no ants. The number of the eggs that hatched in each box was recorded.

Experiment 5: Performance of A. bambawalei in the presence of T. melanocephalum

The same treatments were used in this experiment as in experiment 2, except that A. bambawalei parasitoids were included instead of C. sexmaculata larvae. We transferred 150 third-instar mealybugs to each cotton plant (n = 15) and introduced 2 adult female parasitoids 24 h later. The behavior of the parasitoids was observed continuously and interactions recorded by using a digital video (Sony, HDR-CX240E). The number of visits to mealybugs by the parasitoids within 120 min was recorded. A visit was considered to be the duration of time from when a parasitoid initiated contact with mealybugs until it left, and the duration had to be more than one minute. After 2 weeks, all mealybugs and mummies were counted.

Statistical Analysis

All data were tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test. For the data that were not normally distributed, the Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare the differences in colony weight between treatments, the differences in mealybug survival with and without ants, differences in hatching rates of lady beetle eggs, and differences in the number of parasitoid visits and numbers of mummified mealybugs. Numbers of lady beetle adults and eggs in areas with and without ants were analyzed using a paired sample t-tests. All statistical analyses were conducted with SPSS version 14.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois).

Results

Food Supply and T. melanocephalum Ghost Ant Colony Growth

Different foods resulted in markedly different ghost ants colony masses among treatments (Fig. 1; χ2 = 49.885, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in colony mass between the no food, mealworm and low-density (60 first instars) mealybug treatments (χ2 = 5.105, p = 0.078, df = 2). Colony mass did not differ significantly between the high-density mealybug and sugar treatments (U = 103.00, p = 0.694). However, ghost ant colony mass was significantly greater with high-density mealybugs than with low (U = 5.00, p < 0.001). Ant Tending and P. solenopsis Predation The results showed that ghost ants exerted a positive effect on mealybug survival when lady beetle larvae were present on the plants. The number of surviving mealybugs on plants with ants was significantly greater than on plants without ants (Fig. 2; U = 12.00, p = 0.004, 24 h; U = 8.50, p = 0.001, 48 h; U = 3.00, p < 0.001, 72 h).

Fig 1.

Effects of food supply on colony growth of Tapinoma melanocephalum. Different letters above bars indicate statistically significant differencesamong the treatments (Mann-Whitney test, P = 0.05).

f01_1474.jpg

Ant Avoidance Behavior of Cheilomene sexmaculata Lady Beetles

Our results indicated that lady beetle adults strongly avoided plants on which ghost ants were present, and significantly more lady beetles were observed in areas without ants than in areas with ants (Fig. 3A; t = -8.531, df = 9, p < 0.001). By 24 h the number of lady beetle eggs in the areas without ants had become significantly greater than in the areas with ants (Fig. 3B; t = -3.829, df = 9, p = 0.004).

Ghost Ants and Cheilomene sexmaculata Egg viability

Ghost ants reduced the viability of lady beetle eggs, since significantly fewer hatched in areas with ants than in areas without ants (Fig. 4; U = 9.00, p = 0.002).

Performance of Aenasius bambawalei in the Presence of Ghost Ants

Ant tending had a negative impact on the performance of A. bambawalei. There were fewer visits by wasps to mealybugs in the presence of ants (Fig. 5A; U = 16.50, p = 0.011).and there were more mealybugs mummified on plants without ants than on plants with ants (Fig. 5B; U = 4.00, p = 0.001).

Fig 2.

Effects of ant tending on numbers of mealybugs that survived predation by ladybirds. ** above bars indicate statistically significant differences between the treatment and the control (Mann-Whitney test, P = 0.01).

f02_1474.jpg

Fig 3.

Effects of ant tending on avoidance behavior of lady beetle adults in a choice test in which lady beetles could move between an area with ants and mealybugs and area with mealybugs but without ants. The numbers of eggs laid by lady beetles are shown in the right panel. ** above the bars indicate statistically significant differences between the treatment and the control (paired sample t-tests, P = 0.01)

f03_1474.jpg

Discussion

The fire ant S. invicta protects P. solenopsis from its predators and parasitoids (Zhou et al. 2013). Honeydew produced by P. solenopsis improves the colony growth and fitness of S. invicta (Zhou et al. 2012). The mutualism between P. solenopsis and S. invicta facilitates population increases of both species. Our results demonstrate that T. melanocephalum and P. solenopsis benefit from conditional mutualism. Many studies have shown that honeydew of various hemipterans can support ant colony growth (Porter 1989; Davidson et al. 2004; Abbott & Green 2007). Honeydew produced by P. solenopsis was considered an important food resource for S. invicta because fire ant worker survival was significantly improved when workers were fed with P. solenopsis honeydew (Zhou et al. 2012). However, food derived from animal sources was also essential for colony growth of S. invicta (Helms & Vinson 2008). Ghost ant colony mass was significantly greater when the ants had access to P. solenopsis as opposed to mealworms. Ant tending facilitates the population growth of hemipterans, not only by reducing predation and parasitism from natural enemies, but also by reducing the risk of fungal infection (Way 1963; Stadler & Dixon 1998; Helms & Vison 2003; Daane et al. 2007). Tending by S. invicta can significantly improve the survival of P. solenopsis because of ant predation on ladybeetle larvae and interference with parasitoids (Zhou et al. 2013). Our results showed that T. melanocephalum defends P. solenopsis against its natural enemies. The number of lady beetle adults and mummified mealybugs in the areas without ants were significantly more than in areas with ants (Fig. 3A and Fig. 5B). Both C. sexmaculata and A. bambawalei strongly avoided ghost ants and the performances of both as natural enemies were decisively impeded. Lady beetle egg hatch was sharply decreased by ghost ants. Tapinoma melanocephalum workers effectively utilize their pygidial gland secretions as an alarm-defense system during aggressive encounters with other invaders (Tomalski et al. 1987), and this may have contributed to diminished natural enemy impacts on P. solenopsis in the present experiments. Previously we reported that C. sexmaculata and A. bambawalei attempt to avoid attacks by fire ants (Zhou et al. 2013). In this study, we found that ghost ants rarely attack predators and parasitoids, rather, chemical deterrence may be the defense strategy of ghost ants during aggressive encounters. Hübner & Völkl (1996) showed clearly that aphid hyperparasitoids avoid contact with ants. On the one hand, lady beetles avoid ants because the direct attacks by ants. Survival of C. sexmaculata on fire ants tended plants was significantly diminished (Zhou et al. 2013). Laying fewer eggs near ants is likely to be adaptation because ants can attack and damage lady beetles, especially larvae (Jiggins et al. 1993; Sloggett & Majerus 2003). On the other hand, ant semiochemicals may also contribute to the avoidance response. Lady beetles may avoid laying eggs in the patches that were attended by ants and the highest density of ant semiochemicals resulted in inhibition of egg laying (Oliver et al. 2008). By assessing ant density relative to aphid abundance, Harmon & Andrew (2007) also showed that lady beetles avoid foraging in patches with ants. Godeau et al. (2003) provided evidence for the ability of the lady beetle Coccinella magnifica Redtenbacher (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) to detect the ant trail pheromone. Coccinella magnifica even used wood ant trails to reach aphid colonies (Sloggett et al. 1998).

Fig 4.

Effects of ghost ants on percent egg hatch of Cheilomenes sexmaculata predators. ** above the bars indicate statistically significant differences between the treatment and the control (Mann-Whitney test, P = 0.01).

f04_1474.jpg

Fig. 5.

Effects of ant tending on performance of Aenasius bambawalei as measured by the number of visits to third-instar mealybugs on cotton plants by the wasps, as well as by the number of parasitized mealybugs. * or ** above the bars indicate statistically significant differences between the treatment and the control (Mann-Whitney test, A:P = 0.05; B: P = 0.01).

f05_1474.jpg

In conclusion, ghost ants that defend mealybug are rewarded by an abundant honeydew supply, which serves as an essential food resource for colony growth. And ghost ants frequently disturb predators and parasitoids. Ant attacks had negative impacts on the lady beetles and the wasps. Since lady beetles are unable to tolerate ant attacks, they avoid arenas with ants. Performance of A. bambawalei parasitoids was significantly reduced by present of ghost ants. Our results demonstrated that a mutually beneficial relationship exists between ghost ants and the invasive mealybug under the pressure of enemies. Therefore, interactions between the 2 species may facilitate the invasion of P. solenopsis.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge that this study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31401808) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2014QC024).

References Cited

1.

K. L. Abbott , and P. T. Green 2007. Collapse of an ant-scale mutualism in a rainforest on Christmas Island. Oikos 116: 1238–1246. Google Scholar

2.

R. J. Brightwell , and J. Silverman 2010. Invasive Argentine ants reduce fitness of red maple via a mutualism with an endemic coccid. Biol. Invasions 12: 2051–2057. Google Scholar

3.

K. M. Daane , K. R. Sime , J. Fallon , and M. L. Cooper 2007. Impacts of Argentine ants on mealybugs and their natural enemies in California's coastal vineyards. Ecol. Entomol. 32: 583–596. Google Scholar

4.

D. W. Davidson , S. C. Cook , and R. R. Snelling 2004. Liquid-feeding performances of ants (Formicidae): ecological and evolutionary implications. Oecologia 139: 255–266. Google Scholar

5.

T. Fuchs , J. Stewart , R. Minzenmayer , and M. Rose 1991. First record of Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley in cultivated cotton in the United States. Southwestern Entomol. 16: 215–221. Google Scholar

6.

J. F. Godeau , J. L. Hemptinne , and J. C. Verhaeghe 2003. Ant trail: A highway for Coccinella magnifica Redtenbacher (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) In Proc. 8th Intl. Symp.Ecol. Aphidophaga Arquipe´lago on Biology, ecology and behaviour of aphidophagous insects. Life Mar Sci Supplement 5: 79–83. Google Scholar

7.

J. P. Harmon , and D. A. Andow 2007. Behavioral mechanisms underlying ants' density-dependent deterrence of aphid-eating predators. Oikos 116: 1030–1036. Google Scholar

8.

K. R. Helms , and S. B. Vinson 2002. Widespread association of the invasive ant Solenopsis invicta with an invasive mealybug. Ecology 83: 2425–2438. Google Scholar

9.

K. R. Helms , and S. B. Vinson 2003. Apparent facilitation of an invasive mealybug by an invasive ant. Insectes Sociaux 50: 403–404. Google Scholar

10.

K. R. Helms , and S. B. Vinson 2008. Plant resources and colony growth in an invasive ant: the importance of honeydew-producing hemiptera in carbohydrate transfer across trophic levels. Environ. Entomol. 37: 487–493. Google Scholar

11.

J. N. Holland , J. H. Ness , A. Boyle , and J. L. Bronstein 2005. Mutualisms as consumer-resource interactions, pp. 17–33 In P. Barbosa [ed.], Ecology of Predator-Prey Interactions. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar

12.

B. Hölldobler 1990. The ants. Harvard University Press. Google Scholar

13.

G. Hübner , and W. Völkl 1996. Behavioral strategies of aphid hyperparasitoids to escape aggression by honeydew-collecting ants. J. Insect Behav. 9(1): 143–157. Google Scholar

14.

C. Jiggins , M. E. N. Majerus , and U. Gough 1993. Ant defence of colonies of Aphis fabae Scopoli (Hemiptera: Aphididae), against predation by ladybirds. British J. Entomol. Nat. Hist. 6:129–137. Google Scholar

15.

D. P. Jouvenaz , G. E. Allen , W. A. Banks , and D. P. Wojcik 1977. A survey for pathogens of fire ants, Solenopsis spp., in the southeastern United States. Florida Entomol. 4: 275–279. Google Scholar

16.

Y. Y. Lu , L. Zeng , G. W. Liang , Y. J. Xu , and K. W. Chen 2008. Precaution of solenopsis mealybug Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley. J. of Environ. Entomol. 30: 386–387. Google Scholar

17.

V. S. Nagrare , S. Kranthi , V. K. Biradar , N. N. Zade , V. Sangode , G. Kakde , R. M. Shukla , D. Shivare , B. M. Khadi , and K. R. Kranthi 2009. Widespread infestation of the exotic mealybug species, Phenacoccus solenopsis (Tinsley) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), on cotton in India. Bull. Entomol. Res. 99: 537–541. Google Scholar

18.

T. H. Oliver , I. Jones , J. M. Cook , and S. R. Leather 2008. Avoidance responses of an aphidophagous ladybird, Adalia bipunctata, to aphid-tending ants. Ecol. Entomol. 33: 523–528. Google Scholar

19.

S. D. Porter 1989. Effects of diet on the growth of laboratory fire ant colonies (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 62: 288–291. Google Scholar

20.

B. E. Powell , and J. Silverman 2010. Impact of Linepithema humile and Tapinoma sessile (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on three natural enemies of Aphis gossypii (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Biol. Control 54: 285–291. Google Scholar

21.

J. J. Sloggett , and M. E. N. Majerus 2003. Adaptations of Coccinella magnifi ca, a myrmecophilous coccinellid to aggression by wood ants (Formica rufa group). II. Larval behaviour, and ladybird oviposition location. European J. Entomol. 100: 337–344. Google Scholar

22.

J. J. Sloggett , R. A. Wood , and M. E. N. Majerus 1998. Adaptations of Coccinella magnifica Redtenbacher, a myrmecophilous coccinellid, to aggression by wood ants (Formica rufa group). I. Adult behavioral adaptation, its ecological context and evolution. J. Insect Behav. 11:889–904. Google Scholar

23.

E. Smith , and R. Whitman 1992. Field guide to structural pests. Natl. Pest Mgt. Assoc., Dunn Loring, VA. Google Scholar

24.

M. R. Smith 1965. House-infesting ants of the eastern United States: their recognition, biology, and economic importance . Techn. Bull. 1326. US Dept. of Agric., Washington, DC. Google Scholar

25.

B. Stadler , and A. F. G. Dixon 1998. Costs of ant attendance for aphids. J. Animal Ecol. 67: 454–459. Google Scholar

26.

B. Stadler , and A. F. G. Dixon 2005. Ecology and evolution of aphid-ant interactions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36: 345–372. Google Scholar

27.

J. D. Styrsky , and M. D. Eubanks 2007. Ecological consequences of interactions between ants and honeydew-producing insects. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 274: 151–164. Google Scholar

28.

M. Tomalski , M. Blum , T. Jones , H. Fales , D. Howard , and L. Passera 1987. Chemistry and functions of exocrine secretions of the ants Tapinoma melanocephalum and T. erraticum. J. Chem. Ecol. 13: 253–263. Google Scholar

29.

M. Way 1963. Mutualism between ants and honeydewproducing Homoptera. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 8: 307–344. Google Scholar

30.

W. M. Wheeler 1910. Ants: their structure, development and behavior. Vol. 9, Columbia University Press. Google Scholar

31.

I. Yao , and S. I. Akimoto 2002. Flexibility in the composition and concentration of amino acids in honeydew of the drepanosiphid aphid Tuberculatus quercicola. Ecol. Entomol. 27: 745–752. Google Scholar

32.

A. M. Zhou , Y. Y. Lu , L. Zeng , Y. J. Xu , and G. W. Liang 2012a. Does mutualism drive the invasion of two alien species? The case of Solenopsis invicta and Phenacoccus solenopsis. PloS one 7: e41856. Google Scholar

33.

A. M. Zhou , L. Zeng , Y. Y. Lu , Y. J. Xu , and G. W. Liang 2012b. Fire ants protect mealybugs against their natural enemies by utilizing the leaf shelters constructed by the leaf roller Sylepta derogata. PloS one 7: e49982. Google Scholar

34.

A. M. Zhou , Y. Y. Lu , L. Zeng , Y. J. Xu , and G. W. Liang 2013. Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), defend Phenacoccus solenopsis (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) against its natural enemies. Environ. Entomol. 42: 247–252. Google Scholar
A. M. Zhou, G. W. Liang, L. Zeng, Y. Y. Lu, and Y. J. Xu "Interactions between Ghost Ants and Invasive Mealybugs: The Case of Tapinoma melanocephalum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and Phenacoccus solenopsis (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae)," Florida Entomologist 97(4), 1474-1480, (1 December 2014). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.097.0423
Published: 1 December 2014
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top