Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2014 cDNA Cloning, Characterization and Expression Analysis of Ribosomal Protein S23 Gene of Periplaneta americana (Blattodea: Blattidae)
Wan Chen, Guo-Fang Jiang, Si-Yu Dong, Ran Li
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Ribosomal protein S23 (RPS23) constitutes the ribosomal binding site for mRNA in the 40S initiation complex, and appears to be involved in initiating the translation of messenger RNA into protein (translation step). In this study, a full-length of RPS23 cDNA was cloned from the American cockroach, Periplaneta americana (L.) (Blattodea: Blattidae) by using rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) approaches. The full-length cDNA of the P. americana RPS23 (PaRPS23) was of 615 bp, containing a 5′ untranslated region (UTR) of 116 bp, a 3′ UTR of 67 bp with a poly (A) tail, and an open reading frame of 432 bp encoding a polypeptide of 143 amino acids with the predicted molecular weight of 16.03 kDa and estimated isoelectric point of 10.47 (NCBI accession number: KJ472479). BLAST analysis revealed that amino acids of PaRPS23 shared identity with Graphocephala atropunctata (Signoret) 99%, (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae), Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) 99%, (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae), Pediculus humanus corporis L. 98%, (Phthiraptera: Pediculidae), Riptortus pedestris (F.) 98%, (Hemiptera: Alydidae), Biphyllus lunatus (F.) 98%, (Coleoptera: Biphyllidae), Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) 97%, (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), and Drosophila yakuba Burla 97%, (Diptera: Drosophilidae) and so on. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis indicated that PaRPS23 could be detected in all the tested tissues, in which the relative expression levels were 1.2-, 17.9-, 7.3-, 5.6- and 2.2-fold higher in the ovary, head, thorax, leg and gut than in the testis, respectively. The results provided some important base data for further functional studies in P. americana, and the information may also help to understand the evolution of ribosomes in insects.

The eukaryotic ribosome is a complex macromolecular structure composed of 2 subunits: a large (60S) and small (40S) subunit; the first of these subunits consists of 3 RNAs and 46 proteins, and the second subunit consists of one RNA and 33 proteins (Wool et al. 1995). The exact ribosomal function of specific ribosomal proteins is largely unknown (Wool et al. 1995; Wool 1996).

Ribosomal proteins are highly conserved proteins encoded by the housekeeping genes, as their activity is required for the growth and maintenance of all cell types (Wool 1979); and, further, their expression levels are correlated with the proliferative status of the cells: a high level in rapidly proliferating cells and a lower level in quiescent cells (Bévort & Leffers 2000). In Xenopus spp. (Anura: Pipidae) frogs, and most likely other vertebrates, the synthesis of ribosomal proteins is coordinated with both the rRNA synthesis and the expression of some translational factors, and the expression levels of all are adjusted to the different need for protein synthesis under different conditions (Mager 1988; Pierandrei-Amaldi & Amaldi 1994). The expression levels of ribosomal protein mRNAs in higher eukaryotes are probably mainly determined by the growth rate of the cells, similar to observations in yeast and prokaryotes (Mager 1988; Pierandrei-Amaldi & Amaldi 1994; Planta 1997). This is supported by many reports describing growth-related increases in the expression levels of many ribosomal protein mRNAs and by the observation that at least some ribosomal protein mRNAs are up regulated when cells enter G1 (Wu et al. 1993).

The eukaryotic ribosomal protein S23 (RPS23) belongs to the ribosomal protein family, known as S12 in bacteria and as either S12 or S23 in Archaea (Kitaoka et al. 1994), a domain of single celled prokaryotes. RPS23 is highly conserved among species (Hori et al. 1993), identified in several organisms such as mammals, for example Homo sapiens (Andreev et al. 2011), Rattus norvegicus (Kitaoka et al. 1994), Chinchilla lanigera (GenBank accession No. AAS55902), Sus scrofa (accession No. AAS59430), amphibians (Klein et al. 2002), teleosts (Karsi et al. 2002), insects [e.g., Bombyx mori (Traut et al. 2007) and Plutella xylostella (accession No. BAD26702)], nematodes (Gregory et al. 1997; Kamath et al. 2003), and the earthworm, Lumbricus rubellus (accession No. CAC14789). RPS23 appears to be involved in the translation initiation step of protein synthesis from the messenger RNA template (McMahon et al. 1982). RPS23 was identified as the protein component cross-linked to the globin mRNA protein complex, shown to attach directly to the mRNA (Takahashi et al. 2002), and constituted the ribosomal binding site for mRNA in the 40S initiation complex (Takahashi et al. 2002). In addition, the most frequently expressed genes in human megakaryocytes were identified as platelet factor 1 followed by annexin A1, RPS23 (Kim 2003). Therefore it was demonstrated that RPS23 play a control role in the megakaryocytes of human.

There are more than 4,000 cockroach species but only about 30 are household pests (Titlow et al. 2013). Perhaps the most recognized is the misnamed American cockroach Periplaneta americana (L.), which originated in Africa, and is now found nearly everywhere on the planet. In addition to its rapid running speed (Full & Tu 1991) and evasive behavior, P. americana in the tropics is capable of flight (Ritzmann et al. 1980; Libersat & Camhi 1988). Periplaneta americana is resistant to all major groups of insecticides, and has also been regarded as model for studying insect physiology (Irles et al. 2009; Yoon et al. 2009). However, no information has been available for RPS23 in this evolutionarily important organism so far. The aims of the present study were to characterize RPS23 cDNAs from the cockroach, P. americana.

Materials and Methods

Insect Sampling

Specimens of P. americana were obtained from our laboratory. The colony was maintained at 60–70% RH, 12:12 h L:D and 25 °C. The cockroaches, which molted to adults within 20 to 30 days were selected. We collected heads, thoraxes, legs and guts from 10 females and 10 males, and also ovaries from 10 females and testes from 10 males. All dissection and tissue sampling was carried out on carbon dioxide-anaesthetized specimens dries et al. 2009).

RNA Isolation and cDNA Preparation

Total RNA was isolated from female or male adult P. americana using RNeasy® Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen), following the manufacturers protocols (Irles et al. 2009). Considerable care was taken to ensure that all total RNA samples used for RACE were of high quality (A260/A280 >1.8 in nuclease-free water) with minimal degradation (Geng et al. 2009). To obtain a complete cDNA sequence, 5′ and 3′ RACE were conducted according to the manufacturer's instructions, using the SMARTerTM RACE cDNA Amplification Kit (Clontech, USA), following the manufacturer's protocols.

Cloning the Full-Length cDNA of P. americana RPS23 (PaRPS23)

A putative RPS23 expressed sequence tag (EST) sequence in P. americana was obtained from our previous study (Chen et al. 2013). Based on the partial sequence obtained, specific primers, RPS23-F: 5′-C AACATGACAATACACAGA-3′ and RPS23-NF: 5′-CTCCCACAGCATGACCTTTAC-GACC-3′ for 5′ RACE, and RPS23-R: 5′-CGCC-GTGAACAGAGATGGGCTGATA-3′ and RPS23-NR: 5′-TGGTGGCAGGCTTTGGTCGTAAAGG-3' for 3′ RACE, were designed. The PCR fragments were subjected to electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gel to determine length differences, and the target band was purified by PCR purification kit (Promega, USA). The amplified fragments were cloned into pMD® 19-T Simple Vector (Takara) and sequenced.

Sequence Analysis

Open Reading Frame Finder in NCBI ( http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gorf/gorf.html) was used for distinguishing initiation codon, coding region, termination codon, and 5′ and 3′ UTR of these RPS23 transcript sequences. The nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences of RPS23 cDNA were analyzed and compared using Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) ( http://www.blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ blast.cgi). Molecular weight and isoelectric point of these proteins were predicted by using ProtParam ( http://web. expasy.org/protparam/). The signal peptide was predicted by SignalP 4.1 (Bendtsen et al. 2004). N-linked glycosylation site was predicted by using ProtParam ( http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/ NetNGlyc/). Transmembrane domains were predicted by the TMHMM program ( http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/ TMHMM/).

Phylogenetic Analysis

Phylogenetic analysis of the PaRPS23 gene was performed via multiple steps. Putative orthologues were identified by a PSI-BLAST (Schäffer et al. 2001) search of the NCBI nr database and compiled within a FASTA file. Sequences were aligned using stand-alone ClustalX software (Thompson et al. 1997). Alignments of amino acid sequences were performed using BioEdit 7.0.5 (Hall 1999). Phylogenetic trees were performed using MEGA 6.0 program (Tamura et al. 2013) in which the robustness of the nodes was assessed by bootstrap proportion analysis computed from 1,000 replicates.

Tissue Expression of PaRPS23

Ovary, testis, head, thorax, leg and gut were dissected from P. americana. The mRNA expressions of RPS23 in different tissues were determined by quantitative RT-PCR. Total RNA was extracted as described above. The cDNA synthesis was performed with 500 ng total RNA in a 10 µL reverse transcription reaction system, using PrimeScript® RT reagent Kit (Takara) for the genes, following the manufacturer>s protocols. The RT-PCR reactions were performed with Rotor-Gene Q RT-PCR system. The SYBR Premix Ex Taq kit (Takara) was used according to the manufacturer's protocol. In each PCR reaction, the gene-specific primers, 5′-TGGATTGC-GTACTGCTCGTA-3′ and 5′-TGTTTGGCTGCT-TAGCTTCT-3′, were designed to amplify a product of 176 bp, each primer set has its own optimal Tm for the RT-PCR assays. The housekeeping gene, β-actin rRNA gene of P. americana was used as internal control for normalizing the expression level of PaRPS23. Two β-actin rRNA gene-specific primers, 5′-TTACCACCACTGCCGAACGA-3' and 5′-CCTCTGGACAACG GAACCTC-3′, were designed to amplify a product of 180 bp. RT-PCR was performed in a total volume of 15 µL containing 7.5 µL of 2 × SYBR Green™ Realtime PCR MasterMix, 1.5 µL of cDNA, 0.3 µL of each primer and 5.4 µL of double-distilled water. The reaction conditions were as follows: 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s and 53 °C for 30 s. The melt curve has to be checked to prove that the primers are amplifying the amplicon, so the values reflect the increase in amplicon, not primer dimers or other unrelated nucleotides. The calculated efficiency values for PaRPS23 and β-actin rRNA gene amplicons were always within the range of 95% to 100%; therefore, no correction for efficiency was used in further calculations. The relative expression values were calculated from 3 biological replicates using a modified 2-ΔΔCT method (Livak & Schmittgen 2001). Data from the quantitative RT-PCR were subjected to LSD test in analysis of variance (ANOVA) (SPSS 17.0 for Windows).

Results

Sequence Characterization of PaRPS23

Based on the 264 bp fragment obtained from our previous study, a 431 bp and a 198 bp fragment were amplified by 5′-RACE and 3′-RACE, respectively. These 3 fragments (i.e., 264 bp, 431 bp and 198 bp fragment) were assembled by overlapping to be a 615 bp nucleotide sequence representing the complete PaRPS23 cDNA. The complete PaRPS23 cDNA was further verified by end to end PCR. The PaRPS23 cDNA consisted of an open reading frame (ORF) of 432 nucleotides encoding 143 amino acids, and included a 5′-UTR located 116 bp upstream of the start codon (ATG) and 3′-UTR of 67 nucleotides that ended in a poly (A) tail (Fig. 1). A polypyrimidine sequence, CTTTC, was at the 5′ noncoding sequence. A possible consensus polyadenylation signal, AATAA, was at position 568–572, 14 bases upstream of the poly(A) site. The polyadenylation signal is required for post-translational cleavage-polyadenylation of the 3′ end of the pre-mRNA (Proud-foot & Brownlee 1976). The calculated molecular mass of PaRPS23 was 16.03 kDa, and the estimated isoelectric point was 10.47. The PaRPS23 cDNA sequence has been submitted to GenBank (accession number: KJ472479).

Fig. 1.

Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequence of RPS23 cDNA from Periplaneta americana. The start codon is indicated with bold and the stop codon is indicated both with bold and an asterisk. The polypyrimidine sequence is boxed. The polyadenylation signal is underlined. Sequence analyses using ExPASy translation software.

f01_00.jpg

PaRPS23 is a rather hydrophobic protein with 50 hydrophobic amino acids out of 143 residues. It has a high percentage of basic amino acids (18 lysine acids, 14 arginine acids and 5 histidine acids) mostly located in the N-terminal half of the deduced amino acid sequence, and a low percentage of acidic amino acids (5 aspartic acids and 8 glutamic acids) mostly situated in the C-terminal half. The strong basic character of S23 including PaRPS23 may be instrumental for its binding to rRNA in the 40S subunit of eukaryotic ribosomes (Dudov & Perry 1984; Wiedemann & Perry 1984; Ulbrich et al. 1979). A signal peptide scan using the SignalP 4.1 program ( http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP) was performed, but no signal peptide was identified, and PaRPS23 had no potential N-linked glycosylation site detected by using ProtParam. Also the protein did not have any transmembrane domain predicted by the TMHMM program.

Homology Analysis of PaRPS23

The deduced protein sequence of PaRPS23 was compared with those of the other known RPS23 proteins from various animals in the GenBank nr database (Table 1). The comparisons that yielded the closest identities were with insect RPS23. PaRPS23 is related to Graphocephala atropunctata (ABD98760.1) and Tribolium castaneum (XP_973351.1), both with a total score of 288 and in an alignment of the amino acid sequences with 141 identities in 143 possible matches (99% identity); to Pediculus humanus corporis (XP_002433088.1) with a total score of 287 and in an alignment with 140 identities in 143 possible matches (98% identity); to Riptortus pedestris (BAN20179.1) with a total score of 286 and in an alignment with 140 identities in 143 possible matches (98% identity); to Biphyllus lunatus (CAH04343.1) with a total score is 285 and in an alignment with 140 identities in 143 possible matches (98% identity); to Maconellicoccus hirsutus (ABM55585.1) with a total score of 286 and in an alignment with 139 identities in 143 possible matches (97% identity); to Acyrthosiphon pisum (NP_001156067.1) with a total score of 284 and in an alignment with 139 identities in 143 possible matches (97% identity); to Diaphorina citri (ABG81976.1) with a total score of 283 and in an alignment with 139 identities in 143 possible matches (97% identity) (Table 1).

The sequence alignment of PaRPS23 with known insect RPS23 amino acids was shown in Fig. 2. It was suggested that RPS23 is highly conserved among various holometabolous and hemimetabolous insect species.

Table 1.

Homology analysis of PARPS23. comparison of the deduced protein sequence of PARPS23 the sequences in the genbank database of other known RPS23 proteins from various insect species.

t01_00.gif

Phylogenetic Tree

A phylogenetic tree using the neighbor-joining algorithm was inferred from the amino acid sequences of different RPS23 proteins using MEGA 6.0 program. The bootstrap values from 1,000 resamplings were given at each node and the branch lengths were drawn to scale (Fig. 3). Additionally, tree topologies assessed by the unweighted pair-group method with an arithmetic average (UPGMA), minimum evolution (ME) and maximum parsimony (MP) methods were substantially similar to the neighbor joining tree (data not shown). These observations suggested that the deduced amino acid sequence of RPS23 from P. americana was in the subgroup of Hemimetabola, and this subgroup was significantly different from the subgroup of Holometabola (Fig. 3). These findings suggest that the PaRPS23 has closer genetic relationships with the RPS23 of other Hemimetabola than with Holometabolous species as revealed by the difference of genetic distance.

Tissue Expression of PaRPS23

In order to examine whether PaRPS23 was ubiquitously expressed, quantitative RT-PCR was employed to investigate the distribution of RPS23 mRNA in different tissues (Fig. 4), The RPS23 transcript was expressed in all tissues, indicating that it has a role in various tissue development and insect life cycle. The lowest mRNA level was found in the testis, and the relative expression levels of RPS23 were 1.2-, 17.9-, 7.3-, 5.6- and 2.2-fold higher in the ovary, head, thorax, leg and gut than in the testis, respectively.

Discussion

The RPS23 belongs to the ribosomal protein family, known as S12 in bacteria and as either S12 or S23 in Archaea (Kitaoka et al. 1994). RPS23 located near S6 and S4, and was cross-linked to both EF-1α and EF-2. RPS23 appears to be involved in the translation initiation step of protein synthesis (McMahon & Landau 1982), constitutes the ribosomal binding site for mRNA in the 40S initiation complex (Takahashi et al. 2002), plays a control role in the megakaryocytes of humans (Kim 2003), and is functional during retinoic acid induced neuronal differentiation of human NTERA2 cells (Kitaoka et al. 1994). Also, RPS23 participated in the process of tRNA transfer in the translocation reaction (Spahn et al. 2004). In addition, in mammals, RPS23 can be also used as a novel candidate biomarkers of graft rejection reactions (Andreev et al. 2011).

In the present study, a novel RPS23 gene was cloned from the Americana cockroach, P. americana. Before this study, no full-length cDNA of RPS23 has been isolated in P. americana, and our study is the first report on cloning of the full-length cDNA of cockroach RPS23. The full-length of PaRPS23 was 615 bp, which consisted of an ORF of 432 bp, a 5′-UTR of 116 bp and a 3′-UTR of 67 bp. The ORF of PaRPS23 encoded a polypeptide of 143 amino acids with a calculated molecular weight of about 16.04 kDa and an isoelectric point of 10.47. This result is similar to that of Cornish-Bowden (1980) in which S23 and S24 had similar compositions with the same molecular weight of 16 KD. The difference index pI calculated for this pair is 10.4, which indicates a close relationship between the 2 proteins. A polypyrimidine sequence, CTTTC, was at the 5′ noncoding sequence. The 5′ end of most, if not all, eukaryotic ribosomal protein mRNAs has a pyrimidine sequence (Wool et al. 1996), which is presumed to have a role in the regulation of their translation (Levy et al. 1991).

Fig. 2.

Comparative analysis of the deduced amino acid sequence of PaRPS23 ORF with other known insects. All the other known insects are listed in Table 1. Sequences were aligned using ClustalX software.

f02_00.jpg

Homology analysis revealed that the deduced amino acid sequence of PaRPS23 had more than 90% similarity with other insect RPS23 (99 % with T. castaneum, 98% with R. pedestris, 98% with B. lunatus, 97% with M. hirsutus, 97% with A. pisum, 97% with D. citri, and so on). The high homology of RPS23 in various animals indicates that RPS23 is highly conserved among species (Hori et al. 1993).

In animals, ribosomal proteins have been widely used for phylogenetic analysis as they are highly conserved and offer useful comparisons between distant lineages. However, because of lacking sequence information for P. americana, a phylogenetic analysis between this species and other insects based on the RPS23 protein sequences was never performed before. In this study, the results showed that the PaRPS23 has closer genetic relationship with other Hemimetabola (Hemiptera and Anoplura) RPS23 than with Holometabola (Lepidoptera, Hymenoptera, Diptera and Coleoptera) species, as revealed by the differences in genetic distance. Apparently, RPS23 proteins may be quite suitable for the estimation of evolutionary relationships among different insects.

Quantitative RT-PCR revealed that RPS23 was expressed in all the tested tissues, and the highest expression level occurred in the head and the lowest mRNA level was found in the testis. The relative expression levels were 1.2-, 17.9-, 7.3-, 5.6- and 2.2-fold higher in the ovary, head, thorax, leg and intestine than in the testis, respectively. The differential expression of RPS23 in various P. americana tissues showed that it is an important gene that could effectively be involved in a number of physiological activities, such as regulating protein synthesis (McMahon et al. 1982) and functioning during retinoic acid induced neuronal differentiation (Bévort & Leffers 2000). However, the significance of the relative high expression level of PaRPS23 in the head is unknown, need further investigation.

Fig. 3.

Evolutionary relationships of deduced amino acid sequence of PaRPS23 with other insects constructed using the neighbor-joining method. Bootstrap values with 1000 trials are indicated on branches. Phylogenetic trees were performed using MEGA 6.0 program.

f03_00.jpg

In summary, we first cloned and characterized the cDNA of PaRPS23, and analyzed its gene expression in different tissues of adult P. americana. The determination of the amino acid sequence of cockroach RPS23 is a contribution to a data set, which we hope will eventually include the structure of all proteins in the ribosomes of this species. However, the information may also aid understanding the evolution of ribosomes, unraveling the function of the protein, defining the rules that govern the interaction of these proteins, rRNAs, and unraveling the amino acid sequences that direct the proteins to the nucleolus for assembly on nascent rRNA. Future work should focus on the understanding of the roles of RPS23 on regulating the organelles of P. americana.

Fig. 4.

The relative expression levels of the PaRPS23 in different tagmata of adult Periplaneta americana (bar graph represents Mean ± SE; P < 0.05, LSD in ANOVA). β-actin rRNA gene of P. americana was used as internal control for normalizing the expression level of PaRPS23. As determined using quantitative RT-PCR.

f04_00.jpg

Acknowledgments

Supports were provided by the National Science Foundation of China (Nos. 30670257 and 30970339) and the Key Project of Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (No. 10KJA180023).

References Cited

1.

V. P. Andreev , P. Tryphonopoulos , B. B. Blomberg , N. Tsinoremas , D. Weppler , D. R. Neuman , A. Volsky , S. Nishida , A. Tekin , and G. Selvaggi 2011. Peripheral blood gene expression analysis in intestinal transplantation: A feasibility study for detecting novel candidate biomarkers of graft rejection. Transplantation 92(12): 1385–1391. Google Scholar

2.

J. D. Bendtsen , H. Nielsen , G. Von Heijne , and S. Brunak 2004. Improved prediction of signal peptides: SignalP 3.0. J. Mol. Biol. 340(4): 783–795. Google Scholar

3.

M. Bévort , and H. Leffers 2000. Down regulation of ribosomal protein mRNAs during neuronal differentiation of human NTERA2 cells. Differentiation 66(2): 81–92. Google Scholar

4.

W. Chen , G. F. Jiang , S. H. Sun , Y. Lu , F. Ma , and B. Li 2013. Identification of differentially expressed genes in American cockroach ovaries and testes by suppression subtractive hybridization and the prediction of its miRNAs. Mol. Genet. Genomics 288(11): 627–638. Google Scholar

5.

A. Cornish-Bowden 1980. Critical values for testing the significance of amino acid composition indexes. Anal. Biochem. 105(1): 233–238. Google Scholar

6.

K. P. Dudov , and R. P. Perry 1984. The gene family encoding the mouse ribosomal protein L32 contains a uniquely expressed intron-containing gene and an unmutated processed gene. Cell 37(2): 457–468. Google Scholar

7.

R. J. Full , and M. S. Tu 1991. Mechanics of a rapid running insect: two-, four-and six-legged locomotion. J. Exp. Biol. 156(1): 215–231. Google Scholar

8.

Y. J. Geng , S. T. Gao , D. N. Huang , Y. R. Zhao , J. P. Liu , X. H. Li , and R. L. Zhang 2009. Differentially expressed genes between female and male adult Anopheles anthropophagus. Parasitol. Res. 105(3): 843–851. Google Scholar

9.

W. F. Gregory , M. L. Blaxter , and R. M. Maizels 1997. Differentially expressed, abundant transspliced cDNAs from larval Brugia malayi1. Mol Biochem. Parasit. 87(1): 85–95. Google Scholar

10.

T. A. Hall 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 41: 95–98. Google Scholar

11.

N. Hori , K. Murakawa , R. Matoba , A. Fukushima , K. Okubo , and K. Matsubara 1993. A cDNA sequence of human ribosomal protein, homologue of yeast S28. Nucleic Acids Res. 21(18): 4394. Google Scholar

12.

P. Irles , X. Belles , and M. D. Piulachs 2009. Identifying genes related to choriogenesis in insect panoistic ovaries by Suppression Subtractive Hybridization. BMC Genomics 10: 206. Google Scholar

13.

R. S. Kamath , A. G. Fraser , Y. Dong , G. Poulin , R. Durbin , M. Gotta , A. Kanapin , N. Le Bot , S. Moreno , and M. Sohrmann 2003. Systematic functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using RNAi. Nature 421(6920): 231–237. Google Scholar

14.

A. Karsi , A. Patterson , J. Feng , and Z. Liu 2002. Translational machinery of channel catfish: I. A transcriptomic approach to the analysis of 32 40S ribosomal protein genes and their expression. Gene 291(1): 177–186. Google Scholar

15.

H. L. Kim 2003. Comparison of oligonucleotide-micro-array and serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE) in transcript profiling analysis of megakaryocytes derived from CD34ˆ+ cells. Exp. Mol. Med. 35(5): 460–466. Google Scholar

16.

Y. Kitaoka , J. Olvera , and I. G. Wool 1994. The primary structure of rat ribosomal protein S23. Biochem. Bioph. Res. Co. 202(1): 314–320. Google Scholar

17.

S. L. Klein , R. L. Strausberg , L. Wagner , J. Pontius , S. W. Clifton , and P. Richardson 2002. Genetic and genomic tools for Xenopus research: The NIH Xenopus initiative. Dev. Dynam. 225(4): 384–391. Google Scholar

18.

S. Levy , D. Avni , N. Hariharan , R. P. Perry , and O. Meyuhas 1991. Oligopyrimidine tract at the 5′ end of mammalian ribosomal protein mRNAs is required for their translational control. PNAS. 88(8): 3319–3323. Google Scholar

19.

F. Libersat , and J. M. Camhi 1988. Control of cereal position during flight in the cockroach: a mechanism for regulating sensory feedback. J. Exp. Biol. 136(1): 483–488. Google Scholar

20.

K. J. Livak , and T. D. Schmittgen 2001. Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT Method. Methods 25(4): 402–408. Google Scholar

21.

W. H. Mager 1988. Control of ribosomal protein gene expression. BBA-Gene Struct. Expr. 949(1): 1–15. Google Scholar

22.

G. McMahon , and J. V. Landau 1982. Effect of S12 ribosomal mutations on peptide chain elongation in Escherichia coli: a hydrostatic pressure study. J. Bacteriol. 151(1): 516–520. Google Scholar

23.

P. Pierandrei-Amaldi , and F. Amaldi 1994. Aspects of regulation of ribosomal protein synthesis in Xenopus laevis. Genetica 94(2–3): 181–193. Google Scholar

24.

R. J. Planta 1997. Regulation of ribosome synthesis in yeast. Yeast 13(16): 1505–1518. Google Scholar

25.

N. Proudfoot , and G. Brownlee 1976. 3′ non-coding region sequences in eukaryotic messenger RNA. Nature 263: 211–214. Google Scholar

26.

R. E. Ritzmann , M. L. Tobias , and C. R. Fourtner 1980. Flight activity initiated via giant interneurons of the cockroach: evidence for bifunctional trigger interneurons. Science 210(4468): 443–445. Google Scholar

27.

A. A. Schäffer , L. Aravind , T. L. Madden , S. Shavirin , J. L. Spouge , Y. I. Wolf , E. V. Koonin , and S. F. Altschul 2001. Improving the accuracy of PSI-BLAST protein database searches with composition-based statistics and other refinements. Nucleic. Acids. Res. 29(14): 2994–3005. Google Scholar

28.

C. M. T. Spahn , M. G. Gomez-Lorenzo , R. A. Grassucci , R. Jørgensen , G. R. Andersen , R. Beckmann , P. A. Penczek , J. P. Ballesta , and J. Frank 2004. Domain movements of elongation factor eEF2 and the eukaryotic 80S ribosome facilitate tRNA translocation. EMBO J. 23(5): 1008–1019. Google Scholar

29.

Y. Takahashi , T. Mitsuma , S. Hirayama , and S. Odani 2002. Identification of the ribosomal proteins present in the vicinity of globin mRNA in the 40S initiation complex. J. Biochem. 132(5): 705–711. Google Scholar

30.

K. Tamura , G. Stecher , D. Peterson , A. Filipski , and S. Kumar 2013. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30: 2725–2729. Google Scholar

31.

J. D. Thompson , T. J. Gibson , F. Plewniak , F. Jeanmougin , and D. G. Higgins 1997. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic. Acids. Res. 25(24): 4876–4882. Google Scholar

32.

J. S. Titlow , Z. R. Majeed , H. B. Hartman , E. Burns , and R. L. Cooper 2013. Neural circuit recording from an intact cockroach nervous system. J. Visualized Exp. (81): e50584. Google Scholar

33.

W. Traut , K. Sahara , A. Yoshido , F. Marec , I. Fuková , H. B. Zhang , C. C. Wu , M. R. Goldsmith , and Y. Yasukochi 2007. Conserved synteny of genes between chromosome 15 of Bombyx mori and a chromosome of Manduca sexta shown by five-color BAC-FISH. Genome 50(11): 1061-1065. Google Scholar

34.

N. Ulbrich , A. Lin , and I. G. Wool 1979. Identification by affinity chromatography of the eukaryotic ribosomal proteins that bind to 5.8 S ribosomal ribonucleic acid. J. Biol. Chem. 254(17): 8641–8645. Google Scholar

35.

L. M. Wiedemann , and R. P. Perry 1984. Characterization of the expressed gene and several processed pseudogenes for the mouse ribosomal protein L30 gene family. Mol. Cell Biol. 4(11): 2518–2528. Google Scholar

36.

I. G. Wool 1979. The structure and function of eukaryotic ribosomes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 48(1): 719–754. Google Scholar

37.

I. G. Wool , Y. L. Chan , and A. Glück 1995. Stmcture and evolution of mammalian ribosomal proteins. Biochem. Cell Biol. 73(11–12): 933–947. Google Scholar

38.

I. G. Wool 1996. Extraribosomal functions of ribosomal proteins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 21(5): 164–165. Google Scholar

39.

I. G. Wool , Y. L. Chan , and A. Glück 1996. 24 Mammalian Ribosomes: The structure and the evolution of the proteins. CSH Monograph 30: 685–732. Google Scholar

40.

G. Wu , S. Su , T. Y. T. Kung , and R. C. Bird 1993. Molecular cloning of G1 phase mRNAs from a subtractive G1 phase cDNA library. Biochem. Cell Biol. 71(7–8): 372–380. Google Scholar

41.

C. Yoon , S. H. Kang , J. O. Yang , D. J. Noh , P. Indiragandhi , and G. H. Kim 2009. Repellent activity of citrus oils against the cockroaches Blattelia germanica, Periplaneta americana and P. fuliginosa. J. Pestic. Sci. 34(2): 77–88. Google Scholar
Wan Chen, Guo-Fang Jiang, Si-Yu Dong, and Ran Li "cDNA Cloning, Characterization and Expression Analysis of Ribosomal Protein S23 Gene of Periplaneta americana (Blattodea: Blattidae)," Florida Entomologist 97(4), 1774-1782, (1 December 2014). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.097.0453
Published: 1 December 2014
JOURNAL ARTICLE
9 PAGES


Share
SHARE
KEYWORDS
American cockroach
AREC; PCR cuantitativa en tiempo-real; clonación; caracterización
cucaracha americana
proteína ribosomal S23
RACE; quantitative RT-PCR; cloning; characterization
ribosomal protein S23
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top